Robustness analysis of underground powerhouse construction simulation based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo method

Scheduling is a major concern in construction planning and management, and current construction simulation research typical- ly targets the shortest total duration. However, uncertainties are inevitable in actual construction, which may lead to discrepan- cies between the actual and planned schedule...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScience China. Technological sciences Vol. 59; no. 2; pp. 252 - 264
Main Authors Zhong, DengHua, Bi, Lei, Yu, Jia, Zhao, MengQi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Beijing Science China Press 01.02.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1674-7321
1869-1900
DOI10.1007/s11431-015-5859-3

Cover

More Information
Summary:Scheduling is a major concern in construction planning and management, and current construction simulation research typical- ly targets the shortest total duration. However, uncertainties are inevitable in actual construction, which may lead to discrepan- cies between the actual and planned schedules and increase the risk of total duration delay. Therefore, developing a robust construction scheduling technique is of vital importance for mitigating disturbance and improving completion probability. In the present study, the authors propose a robustness analysis method that involves underground powerhouse construction simu- lation based on the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. Specifically, the MCMC method samples construction dis- turbances by considering the interrelationship between the states of parameters through a Markov state transition probability matrix, which is more robust and efficient than traditional sampling methods such as the Monte Carlo (MC) method. Addition- ally, a hierarchical simulation model coupling critical path method (CPM) and a cycle operation network (CYCLONE) is built, using which construction duration and robustness criteria can be calculated. Furthermore, a detailed measurement method is presented to quantize the robustness of underground powerhouse construction, and the setting model of the time buffer is pro- posed based on the MCMC method. The application of this methodology not only considers duration but also robustness, providing scientific guidance for engineering decision making. We analyzed a case study project to demonstrate the effective- ness and superiority of the proposed methodology.
Bibliography:underground powerhouse, construction schedule, simulation model, MCMC method, robustness
Scheduling is a major concern in construction planning and management, and current construction simulation research typical- ly targets the shortest total duration. However, uncertainties are inevitable in actual construction, which may lead to discrepan- cies between the actual and planned schedules and increase the risk of total duration delay. Therefore, developing a robust construction scheduling technique is of vital importance for mitigating disturbance and improving completion probability. In the present study, the authors propose a robustness analysis method that involves underground powerhouse construction simu- lation based on the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method. Specifically, the MCMC method samples construction dis- turbances by considering the interrelationship between the states of parameters through a Markov state transition probability matrix, which is more robust and efficient than traditional sampling methods such as the Monte Carlo (MC) method. Addition- ally, a hierarchical simulation model coupling critical path method (CPM) and a cycle operation network (CYCLONE) is built, using which construction duration and robustness criteria can be calculated. Furthermore, a detailed measurement method is presented to quantize the robustness of underground powerhouse construction, and the setting model of the time buffer is pro- posed based on the MCMC method. The application of this methodology not only considers duration but also robustness, providing scientific guidance for engineering decision making. We analyzed a case study project to demonstrate the effective- ness and superiority of the proposed methodology.
11-5845/TH
ISSN:1674-7321
1869-1900
DOI:10.1007/s11431-015-5859-3