Was/were variation: A perspective from London
This article presents a systematic analysis of morphosyntactic variation in London English, investigating was/were variation in the speech of adolescents and elderly speakers in a multicultural inner London area and a less diverse outer London area. In outer London, dialect leveling to a mixed was/w...
Saved in:
Published in | Language variation and change Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 1 - 38 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York, USA
Cambridge University Press
01.01.2009
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This article presents a systematic analysis of morphosyntactic variation in London English, investigating was/were variation in the speech of adolescents and elderly speakers in a multicultural inner London area and a less diverse outer London area. In outer London, dialect leveling to a mixed was/weren't system is well underway, as in many other areas of the U.K. Negative weren't is frequent and a grammaticalized invariant weren't it tag is developing. In inner London, variation in adolescent speech is strongly influenced by ethnicity, resulting in a lower overall frequency of was leveling and, in negative contexts, a mixed pattern of leveling to both wasn't and weren't. The patterns of variation of Anglo “heritage” inner London adolescents differ both from elderly speakers in the same area and from their peers in outer London. Our analysis confirms the need for socially realistic models of language change that take account of the social diversity of large multicultural urban cities. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:23FEE68DE90667960206289FF362377921A292A4 ArticleID:00001 We are grateful to the Economic and Social Research Council for funding the project Linguistic Innovators: the English of Adolescents in London (ref. RES-000-23-0680) of which the work reported here forms a part. We would also like to thank the following people for their comments, constructive criticisms, and general advice: David Adger, David Britain, Kirk Hazen, Arfaan Khan, and the three anonymous referees. ark:/67375/6GQ-0Q0RQWQ4-V PII:S0954394509000015 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0954-3945 1469-8021 |
DOI: | 10.1017/S0954394509000015 |