Was/were variation: A perspective from London

This article presents a systematic analysis of morphosyntactic variation in London English, investigating was/were variation in the speech of adolescents and elderly speakers in a multicultural inner London area and a less diverse outer London area. In outer London, dialect leveling to a mixed was/w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLanguage variation and change Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 1 - 38
Main Authors Cheshire, Jenny, Fox, Sue
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.01.2009
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article presents a systematic analysis of morphosyntactic variation in London English, investigating was/were variation in the speech of adolescents and elderly speakers in a multicultural inner London area and a less diverse outer London area. In outer London, dialect leveling to a mixed was/weren't system is well underway, as in many other areas of the U.K. Negative weren't is frequent and a grammaticalized invariant weren't it tag is developing. In inner London, variation in adolescent speech is strongly influenced by ethnicity, resulting in a lower overall frequency of was leveling and, in negative contexts, a mixed pattern of leveling to both wasn't and weren't. The patterns of variation of Anglo “heritage” inner London adolescents differ both from elderly speakers in the same area and from their peers in outer London. Our analysis confirms the need for socially realistic models of language change that take account of the social diversity of large multicultural urban cities.
Bibliography:istex:23FEE68DE90667960206289FF362377921A292A4
ArticleID:00001
We are grateful to the Economic and Social Research Council for funding the project Linguistic Innovators: the English of Adolescents in London (ref. RES-000-23-0680) of which the work reported here forms a part. We would also like to thank the following people for their comments, constructive criticisms, and general advice: David Adger, David Britain, Kirk Hazen, Arfaan Khan, and the three anonymous referees.
ark:/67375/6GQ-0Q0RQWQ4-V
PII:S0954394509000015
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0954-3945
1469-8021
DOI:10.1017/S0954394509000015