Cross-agreement complaints before the Appellate Body: a case study of the EC–Asbestos dispute
WTO panels are often called upon to decide overlapping claims based on different WTO agreements. One such dispute was the EC–Asbestos case where claims were made under both GATT 1994 and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). This paper examines whether the Appellate Body's refusal...
Saved in:
Published in | World trade review Vol. 1; no. 1; pp. 63 - 87 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cambridge, UK
Cambridge University Press
01.03.2002
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | WTO panels are often called upon to decide overlapping claims based on
different WTO agreements. One such dispute was the EC–Asbestos case where
claims were made under both GATT 1994 and the Agreement on Technical Barriers
to Trade (TBT). This paper examines whether the Appellate Body's refusal in that
case to examine Canada's TBT claims was justified. The conclusion reached is no,
based on the principle jura novit curia, the general prohibition on non liquet and the
WTO case law on judicial economy. In addition, the paper examines when two
WTO norms must be seen as ‘in conflict’. It argues in favour of broadening the
current definition of conflict and clarifies the consequences of a norm being
lex specialis. |
---|---|
AbstractList | WTO panels are often called upon to decide overlapping claims based on different WTO agreements. One such dispute was the EC-Asbestos case where claims were made under both GATT 1994 and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). This paper examines whether the Appellate Body's refusal in that case to examine Canada's TBT claims was justified. The conclusion reached is no, based on the principle jura novit curia, the general prohibition on non liquet and the WTO case law on judicial economy. In addition, the paper examines when two WTO norms must be seen as 'in conflict'. It argues in favour of broadening the current definition of conflict and clarifies the consequences of a norm being lex specialis. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] WTO panels are often called upon to decide overlapping claims based on different WTO agreements. One such dispute was the EC–Asbestos case where claims were made under both GATT 1994 and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). This paper examines whether the Appellate Body's refusal in that case to examine Canada's TBT claims was justified. The conclusion reached is no, based on the principle jura novit curia , the general prohibition on non liquet and the WTO case law on judicial economy. In addition, the paper examines when two WTO norms must be seen as ‘in conflict’. It argues in favour of broadening the current definition of conflict and clarifies the consequences of a norm being lex specialis . WTO panels are often called upon to decide overlapping claims based on different WTO agreements. One such dispute was the EC-Asbestos case where claims were made under both GATT 1994 and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). This paper examines whether the Appellate Body's refusal in that case to examine Canada's TBT claims was justified. The conclusion reached is no, based on the principle 'jura novit curia', the general prohibition on non liquet and the WTO case law on judicial economy. In addition, the paper examines when two WTO norms must be seen as 'in conflict'. It argues in favour of broadening the current definition of conflict and clarifies the consequences of a norm being 'lex specialis'. WTO panels are often called upon to decide overlapping claims based on different WTO agreements. One such dispute was the EC–Asbestos case where claims were made under both GATT 1994 and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT). This paper examines whether the Appellate Body's refusal in that case to examine Canada's TBT claims was justified. The conclusion reached is no, based on the principle jura novit curia, the general prohibition on non liquet and the WTO case law on judicial economy. In addition, the paper examines when two WTO norms must be seen as ‘in conflict’. It argues in favour of broadening the current definition of conflict and clarifies the consequences of a norm being lex specialis. |
Author | PAUWELYN, JOOST |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: JOOST surname: PAUWELYN fullname: PAUWELYN, JOOST organization: New York University and Columbia Law School |
BookMark | eNp1UMFu3CAQRVUiNZvkA3JDvTthwBi7t-1q240UqYcmZ4TNsHG0Ni6wh73lH_KH_ZLi7FY9VBWgQTNv3rx5C3I2-hEJuQF2CwzU3Q8oVT6yYsDyFeIDucgpWQgQ9dn7vyzm-keyiPGFMV6yUl0QvQo-xsJsA-KAY6KdH6ad6ccUaYvOB6TpGelymnC3MwnpF28Pn6mhnYlIY9rbA_XuHbNe_Xp9W8YWY_KR2j5O-4RX5NyZXcTrU7wkT1_Xj6tN8fD92_1q-VB0opZ1gY0VznJeIuOCSYtd1QhWcUQOZa5JI7k1rRI1F65prKsbpRSqVlrnRAPiknw68k7B_9xnCfrF78OYR2oOwBUIKTMIjqBuXjqg01PoBxMOGpiebdT_2Jh7NseeMPRJm21eK-mIJnTPuh-zQXPah622vp9phIDqD4wzaFidH8gK6kwlTuPN0IbebvGvyP8L-A203o7V |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1017_S0020589312000358 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0020818310000020 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1474745616000239 crossref_primary_10_1093_iclq_53_4_861 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Joost Pauwelyn |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Joost Pauwelyn |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7WY 7WZ 7XB 87Z 8BF 8FK 8FL ABUWG AFKRA AXJJW BENPR BEZIV CCPQU DWQXO FREBS FRNLG F~G K60 K6~ K8~ L.- M0C M0Q PQBIZ PQBZA PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U |
DOI | 10.1017/S1474745601001033 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) ABI/INFORM Collection ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection European Business Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central Asian & European Business Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Business Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni) Business Premium Collection (Alumni) ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Business Collection DELNET Management Collection ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Global European Business Database ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business ProQuest European Business Asian & European Business Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central China ABI/INFORM Complete Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ProQuest European Business (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition) Business Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest DELNET Management Collection ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) Business Premium Collection (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Business |
EISSN | 1475-3138 |
EndPage | 87 |
ExternalDocumentID | 1403419101 10_1017_S1474745601001033 10.3316/agispt.20190819015618 |
Genre | Research Article Report Feature Case Study |
GeographicLocations | EUROPE CANADA Canada |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: EUROPE – name: CANADA – name: Canada |
GroupedDBID | -E. .FH .FK 09C 09D 0E1 0R~ 0ZK 123 2-G 29R 3V. 4.4 5VS 6DY 6~8 74X 74Z 7WY 7~V 8FL 8I0 8R4 8R5 AABWE AACJH AACLI AAEED AAGFV AAKTX AALKF AAOIO AAPYI AARAB AARQT AASVR AAUIV AAUKB ABACO ABBXD ABCII ABFRF ABGAY ABGDZ ABHHT ABITZ ABJNI ABLJU ABMYL ABQWD ABROB ABTCQ ABTND ABTXH ABUWG ABYPY ABZCX ABZQA ACABY ACCHT ACFCP ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACIHN ACIMK ACMJI ACQFJ ACREK ACUIJ ACUYZ ACWGA ACYZP ACZBM ACZBN ADBZK ADEEV ADEYR ADFEC ADGEJ ADKIL ADMVX ADOCW ADOVH ADTCA ADUOI ADVJH AEAQA AEBAK AEDZA AEFWE AEHGV AEYYC AFACB AFFUJ AFKQG AFKRA AFKRZ AFKSM AFLVW AFUTZ AFZTK AGABE AGHGI AGJUD AGOOT AHEHV AHQXX AHRGI AHZJZ AIGNW AIHIV AISIE AIXTP AJ7 AJOFM AJPFC AJQAS AKNUK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALVPG ANFVQ AOWSX ARABE ASBRX ATUCA AUXHV AVDNQ AWRMI AXJJW BBLKV BENPR BEZIV BGHMG BHRNT BMAJL BPHCQ C0O CAG CCPQU CCQAD CFAFE CGMFO CHEAL CJCSC COF CS3 DC4 DOHLZ DU5 DWQXO EBS EBU ED0 EJD FM. FRNLG GCT GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE HG- HISYW HOVLH HSS HST HZ~ I.5 IH6 IOEEP IS6 I~P J36 J38 J3B JHPGK JOSPZ JPPIE JQKCU JRMXA K1G K60 K6~ K8~ KGA KGS L98 LAAQE LBA LDNZT LFVXT LGEZI LKZDS LMKDQ LNAJO LOTEE LW7 LXB LXO M-V M0C NADUK NIKVX NXXTH O9- OYBOY P2P PQBIZ PQQKQ PROAC Q.- Q2X RCA RHO RIG ROL RR0 RWL RXW S6- S6U T9M TAF UNMZH UT1 UVLOZ W2G WFFJZ WJGAX WQ3 WXS WXY WYP ZYDXJ ZYG ~A4 ~ZZ HCSNT PQBZA AAYXX CITATION 7XB 8BF 8FK L.- M0Q PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3858-e9d3fd224e02305dec693062ee2149d35a52dab73823f99df89777e7b5dff3913 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 1474-7456 |
IngestDate | Thu Oct 10 19:03:55 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 01:56:09 EDT 2024 Wed Aug 28 03:32:53 EDT 2024 Wed Mar 13 05:49:43 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3858-e9d3fd224e02305dec693062ee2149d35a52dab73823f99df89777e7b5dff3913 |
Notes | WORLD TRADE REVIEW, Vol. 1, No. 1, Mar 2002, 63-87 Informit, Melbourne (Vic) |
PQID | 211271355 |
PQPubID | 43033 |
PageCount | 25 |
ParticipantIDs | rmit_agispt_search_informit_org_doi_10_3316_agispt_20190819015618 cambridge_journals_10_1017_S1474745601001033 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1474745601001033 proquest_journals_211271355 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20020301 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2002-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2002 text: 20020301 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Cambridge, UK |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Cambridge, UK – name: Cambridge |
PublicationTitle | World trade review |
PublicationTitleAlternate | World Trade Review |
PublicationYear | 2002 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Publisher_xml | – name: Cambridge University Press |
SSID | ssj0024047 |
Score | 1.6474179 |
Snippet | WTO panels are often called upon to decide overlapping claims based on
different WTO agreements. One such dispute was the EC–Asbestos case where
claims were... WTO panels are often called upon to decide overlapping claims based on different WTO agreements. One such dispute was the EC-Asbestos case where claims were... WTO panels are often called upon to decide overlapping claims based on different WTO agreements. One such dispute was the EC–Asbestos case where claims were... |
SourceID | proquest crossref rmit cambridge |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 63 |
SubjectTerms | Agreements Asbestos Asbestos fibers Bans Case studies Commercial treaties Dispute resolution (Law) Environmental aspects European communities Foreign relations International disputes International trade Provisions Studies Trade barriers Trade restrictions World Trade Organization. Appellate Body |
Title | Cross-agreement complaints before the Appellate Body: a case study of the EC–Asbestos dispute |
URI | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474745601001033/type/journal_article http://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20190819015618 https://www.proquest.com/docview/211271355 |
Volume | 1 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LS8NAEF60BfEiPrFWZQ-exMUkm6cXaUtL8VBELPQiIfsqXpraxIP_3plN0laEXjfLBia7M99kvp2PkDsIesIRoWJaQYrimyhjAnwgE6EOuSOFL6QlyE7C8dR_mQWzmptT1LTKxidaR61yif_IHyFR8VBOLnhefjEUjcLiaq2gsU_aHiQKTou0-8PJ69um2Z5jFcZcH0mHABWasib2jMZBHHNcq3XAt5sr_A1SG-S5dcnexp_RMTmqgSPtVV_6hOzpxSk5aHjrZ-RjgEuxDPJn-8ePWrI45P1lQYUGaKopYD0KqBP5TqWm_Vz9PNGMSohj1HaZpbmxc4YD1isESs4UVH0WqPpwTqaj4ftgzGrtBCax1Md0orhREJ81JhmB0hI1D0NPa7AUPAuywFOZiLAMaJJEmRiAYKQjEShjeOLyC9Ja5At9SajmUWyyjMtAxj72b3NV4ohIO7GvQiNVhzysDZfWJ6BIK_ZYlP6zc4fcN7ZNl1VHjV2Tu431N0uvt0KH4Gko02wOtijTyjekVcdZGM5X8xQCA67OuRs20zy8Pl8BodCNr3a-oUsOrfyLJZ1dk1a5-tY3gEJKcVvvtV_EHtcC |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,21400,27936,27937,33756,43817,74630 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LS8QwEA66C-pFfOL6zMGTGGybPr2ILrusr0VEwYuE5iVetrqtB_-9M2nrKoLXEFKYJjPfZL7MR8ghBD3pyVgzoyFFCW2SMwk-kMnYxNxTMpTKEWTH8egxvHqKnhpuTtnQKluf6By1LhTekZ9AohKgnFx09vbOUDQKi6uNgsY86WKnKsi9uheD8d39rNme5xTG_BBJhwAV2rIm9ozGQRzzfKd1wH82V_gdpGbI88cjexd_hitkuQGO9Lz-06tkzkzWyELLW18nz31ciuWQP7sbP-rI4pD3VyWVBqCpoYD1KKBO5DtVhl4U-vOU5lRBHKOuyywtrJsz6LPzUqLkTEn1a4mqDxvkcTh46I9Yo53AFJb6mMk0txris8EkI9JGoeZhHBgTQE6keZRHgc5lgmVAm2XapgAEE5PISFvLM59vks6kmJgtQg1PUpvnXEUqDbF_m68zTybGS0MdW6V75PjbcKI5AaWo2WOJ-GPnHjlqbSve6o4a_03eaa0_W_p7K_QInoZK5C9gi0rUvkHUHWdhuJi-CAgMuDrnftxOC_D5fA2EYj_d_vcLB2Rx9HB7I24ux9c7ZMlJwTgC2i7pVNMPsweIpJL7zb77AiCs2fw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1NSxxBEC2SFSQXiTHiaox98BRsnJmeTy-i6y4mhkVEwUto-lO87KgzOeTfW9Uz4xoEr03TDTXdVa-mXtcD2MegpyOdW-4spiipLxTX6AO5zl0uIqNTbQJBdp6f36S_brPbvqVQ09MqB58YHLWtDf0jP8REJSE5uezQ96yIy7PZ8cMjJwEpKrT2ahofYaVIcZsRrJxO55dXy8Z7UVAbi1MiICJsGEqc1D-aBmksioPugXjdaOH_gLVEoa8e3IdYNPsMaz2IZCfdV1-HD27xBVYHDvsG_JnQUlxhLh3-_rFAHFf3i7Zh2iFMdQxxH0MEStyn1rHT2v47YooZjGksdJxltQ9zphN-0miSn2mYvW9IAeIr3Mym15Nz3usocENlP-4qK7zFWO0o4cisM6R_mCfOJZgfWZGpLLFKF1QS9FVlfYmgsHCFzqz3oorFJowW9cJtAXOiKL1SwmSmTKmXW2yrSBcuKlObe2PHcPBiONnfhkZ2TLJCvrHzGH4MtpUPXXeN9ybvDNZfLv1yLMZAN6OV6g5t0crOT8iu-ywO1093EoMErS5EnA_TEnpK34GiPC63391hD1bxyMnfP-cXO_ApqMIELto3GLVPf90ugpNWf--P3TN7id4q |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-agreement+complaints+before+the+Appellate+Body%3A+A+case+study+of+the+%27EC-Asbestos%27+dispute&rft.jtitle=World+trade+review&rft.au=Joost+Pauwelyn&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.issn=1474-7456&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=87&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017%2FS1474745601001033&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10.3316%2Fagispt.20190819015618 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1474-7456&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1474-7456&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1474-7456&client=summon |