An automated and multiparametric algorithm for objective analysis of meibography images
Meibography is a non-contact imaging technique used by ophthalmologists and eye care practitioners to acquire information on the characteristics of meibomian glands. One of its most important applications is to assist in the evaluation and diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). As the artif...
Saved in:
Published in | Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery Vol. 11; no. 4; pp. 1586 - 1599 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
China
AME Publishing Company
01.04.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 2223-4292 2223-4306 |
DOI | 10.21037/qims-20-611 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Meibography is a non-contact imaging technique used by ophthalmologists and eye care practitioners to acquire information on the characteristics of meibomian glands. One of its most important applications is to assist in the evaluation and diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). As the artificial qualitative analysis of meibography images can lead to low repeatability and efficiency, automated and quantitative evaluation would greatly benefit the image analysis process. Moreover, since the morphology and function of meibomian glands varies at different stages of MGD, multiparametric analysis offering more comprehensive information could help in discovering subtle changes to glands during MGD progression. Therefore, an automated and multiparametric objective analysis of meibography images is urgently needed.
An algorithm was developed to perform multiparametric analysis of meibography images with fully automatic and repeatable segmentation based on image contrast enhancement and noise reduction. The full architecture can be divided into three steps: (I) segmentation of the tarsal conjunctiva area as the region of interest (ROI); (II) segmentation and identification of glands within the ROI; and (III) quantitative multiparametric analysis including a newly defined gland diameter deformation index (
), gland tortuosity index (
), and gland signal index (
). To evaluate the performance of this automated algorithm, the similarity index (
) and the segmentation error including the false-positive rate (
) and the false-negative rate (
) were calculated between the manually defined ground truth and the automatic segmentations of both the ROI and meibomian glands of 15 typical meibography images.
The results of the performance evaluation between the manually defined ground truth and automatic segmentations were as follows: for ROI segmentation, the similarity index (
)=0.94±0.02, the false-positive rate (
)=6.02%±2.41%, and the false-negative rate (
)=6.43%±1.98%; for meibomian gland segmentation, the similarity index (
)=0.87±0.01, the false-positive rate (
)=4.35%±1.50%, and the-false negative rate (
)=18.61%±1.54%. The algorithm was successfully applied to process typical meibography images acquired from subjects of different meibomian gland health statuses, by providing the gland area ratio (
), the gland length (
), gland width (
), gland diameter deformation index (
), gland tortuosity index (
), and gland signal index (
).
A fully automated algorithm was developed which demonstrated high similarity with moderate segmentation errors for meibography image segmentation compared with the manual approach, offering multiple parameters to quantify the morphology and function of meibomian glands for the objective evaluation of meibography images. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Meibography is a non-contact imaging technique used by ophthalmologists and eye care practitioners to acquire information on the characteristics of meibomian glands. One of its most important applications is to assist in the evaluation and diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). As the artificial qualitative analysis of meibography images can lead to low repeatability and efficiency, automated and quantitative evaluation would greatly benefit the image analysis process. Moreover, since the morphology and function of meibomian glands varies at different stages of MGD, multiparametric analysis offering more comprehensive information could help in discovering subtle changes to glands during MGD progression. Therefore, an automated and multiparametric objective analysis of meibography images is urgently needed.BACKGROUNDMeibography is a non-contact imaging technique used by ophthalmologists and eye care practitioners to acquire information on the characteristics of meibomian glands. One of its most important applications is to assist in the evaluation and diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). As the artificial qualitative analysis of meibography images can lead to low repeatability and efficiency, automated and quantitative evaluation would greatly benefit the image analysis process. Moreover, since the morphology and function of meibomian glands varies at different stages of MGD, multiparametric analysis offering more comprehensive information could help in discovering subtle changes to glands during MGD progression. Therefore, an automated and multiparametric objective analysis of meibography images is urgently needed.An algorithm was developed to perform multiparametric analysis of meibography images with fully automatic and repeatable segmentation based on image contrast enhancement and noise reduction. The full architecture can be divided into three steps: (I) segmentation of the tarsal conjunctiva area as the region of interest (ROI); (II) segmentation and identification of glands within the ROI; and (III) quantitative multiparametric analysis including a newly defined gland diameter deformation index (DI), gland tortuosity index (TI), and gland signal index (SI). To evaluate the performance of this automated algorithm, the similarity index (k) and the segmentation error including the false-positive rate (rP ) and the false-negative rate (rN ) were calculated between the manually defined ground truth and the automatic segmentations of both the ROI and meibomian glands of 15 typical meibography images.METHODSAn algorithm was developed to perform multiparametric analysis of meibography images with fully automatic and repeatable segmentation based on image contrast enhancement and noise reduction. The full architecture can be divided into three steps: (I) segmentation of the tarsal conjunctiva area as the region of interest (ROI); (II) segmentation and identification of glands within the ROI; and (III) quantitative multiparametric analysis including a newly defined gland diameter deformation index (DI), gland tortuosity index (TI), and gland signal index (SI). To evaluate the performance of this automated algorithm, the similarity index (k) and the segmentation error including the false-positive rate (rP ) and the false-negative rate (rN ) were calculated between the manually defined ground truth and the automatic segmentations of both the ROI and meibomian glands of 15 typical meibography images.The results of the performance evaluation between the manually defined ground truth and automatic segmentations were as follows: for ROI segmentation, the similarity index (k)=0.94±0.02, the false-positive rate (rP )=6.02%±2.41%, and the false-negative rate (rN )=6.43%±1.98%; for meibomian gland segmentation, the similarity index (k)=0.87±0.01, the false-positive rate (rP )=4.35%±1.50%, and the-false negative rate (rN )=18.61%±1.54%. The algorithm was successfully applied to process typical meibography images acquired from subjects of different meibomian gland health statuses, by providing the gland area ratio (GA), the gland length (L), gland width (D), gland diameter deformation index (DI), gland tortuosity index (TI), and gland signal index (SI).RESULTSThe results of the performance evaluation between the manually defined ground truth and automatic segmentations were as follows: for ROI segmentation, the similarity index (k)=0.94±0.02, the false-positive rate (rP )=6.02%±2.41%, and the false-negative rate (rN )=6.43%±1.98%; for meibomian gland segmentation, the similarity index (k)=0.87±0.01, the false-positive rate (rP )=4.35%±1.50%, and the-false negative rate (rN )=18.61%±1.54%. The algorithm was successfully applied to process typical meibography images acquired from subjects of different meibomian gland health statuses, by providing the gland area ratio (GA), the gland length (L), gland width (D), gland diameter deformation index (DI), gland tortuosity index (TI), and gland signal index (SI).A fully automated algorithm was developed which demonstrated high similarity with moderate segmentation errors for meibography image segmentation compared with the manual approach, offering multiple parameters to quantify the morphology and function of meibomian glands for the objective evaluation of meibography images.CONCLUSIONSA fully automated algorithm was developed which demonstrated high similarity with moderate segmentation errors for meibography image segmentation compared with the manual approach, offering multiple parameters to quantify the morphology and function of meibomian glands for the objective evaluation of meibography images. Meibography is a non-contact imaging technique used by ophthalmologists and eye care practitioners to acquire information on the characteristics of meibomian glands. One of its most important applications is to assist in the evaluation and diagnosis of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). As the artificial qualitative analysis of meibography images can lead to low repeatability and efficiency, automated and quantitative evaluation would greatly benefit the image analysis process. Moreover, since the morphology and function of meibomian glands varies at different stages of MGD, multiparametric analysis offering more comprehensive information could help in discovering subtle changes to glands during MGD progression. Therefore, an automated and multiparametric objective analysis of meibography images is urgently needed. An algorithm was developed to perform multiparametric analysis of meibography images with fully automatic and repeatable segmentation based on image contrast enhancement and noise reduction. The full architecture can be divided into three steps: (I) segmentation of the tarsal conjunctiva area as the region of interest (ROI); (II) segmentation and identification of glands within the ROI; and (III) quantitative multiparametric analysis including a newly defined gland diameter deformation index ( ), gland tortuosity index ( ), and gland signal index ( ). To evaluate the performance of this automated algorithm, the similarity index ( ) and the segmentation error including the false-positive rate ( ) and the false-negative rate ( ) were calculated between the manually defined ground truth and the automatic segmentations of both the ROI and meibomian glands of 15 typical meibography images. The results of the performance evaluation between the manually defined ground truth and automatic segmentations were as follows: for ROI segmentation, the similarity index ( )=0.94±0.02, the false-positive rate ( )=6.02%±2.41%, and the false-negative rate ( )=6.43%±1.98%; for meibomian gland segmentation, the similarity index ( )=0.87±0.01, the false-positive rate ( )=4.35%±1.50%, and the-false negative rate ( )=18.61%±1.54%. The algorithm was successfully applied to process typical meibography images acquired from subjects of different meibomian gland health statuses, by providing the gland area ratio ( ), the gland length ( ), gland width ( ), gland diameter deformation index ( ), gland tortuosity index ( ), and gland signal index ( ). A fully automated algorithm was developed which demonstrated high similarity with moderate segmentation errors for meibography image segmentation compared with the manual approach, offering multiple parameters to quantify the morphology and function of meibomian glands for the objective evaluation of meibography images. |
Author | Deng, Yuqing Wang, Gengyuan Yuan, Jin Xiao, Peng Luo, Zhongzhou |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Peng surname: Xiao fullname: Xiao, Peng – sequence: 2 givenname: Zhongzhou surname: Luo fullname: Luo, Zhongzhou – sequence: 3 givenname: Yuqing surname: Deng fullname: Deng, Yuqing – sequence: 4 givenname: Gengyuan surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Gengyuan – sequence: 5 givenname: Jin surname: Yuan fullname: Yuan, Jin |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33816193$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNptkctLxDAQxoMoPlZvniVHD1bzaDftRRDxBYIXxWOYJulupGnWJF3Y_974WlScywzMb74Z5ttDm4MfDEKHlJwySrg4e7UuFowUU0o30C5jjBclJ9PN75o1bAcdxPhCcoiaCkq20Q7nNZ3Shu-i54sBw5i8g2Q0hkFjN_bJLiCAMylYhaGf-WDT3OHOB-zbF6OSXZrMQr-KNmLfYWds62cBFvMVtg5mJu6jrQ76aA6-8gQ9XV89Xt4W9w83d5cX94XidZkKzRRoYnhbAaNVS2vNNBWs6WjDlO5IWdZt1QkN0FTAS13lsUZx1bIaGtNyPkHnn7qLsXVGKzOkAL1chHxGWEkPVv7uDHYuZ34pRZPfJKZZ4PhLIPjX0cQknY3K9D0Mxo9RsorUOUQtMnr0c9d6yfc3M3DyCajgYwymWyOUyA-_5LtfkhGZ_co4-4MrmyBZ_36p7f8fegNB4pw7 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12123167 crossref_primary_10_53941_rmd_2025_100004 crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_13247 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_17542 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xops_2023_100334 crossref_primary_10_1111_ceo_14119 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcell_2022_1067914 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eclinm_2021_101132 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtos_2021_11_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_13321 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11092396 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtos_2023_07_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12020_024_03943_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00417_024_06443_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcell_2024_1518154 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_survophthal_2024_07_005 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2021_766393 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clae_2024_102322 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jtos_2021_11_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e34979 crossref_primary_10_1080_08164622_2023_2251994 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11051427 crossref_primary_10_1097_OPX_0000000000002208 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcell_2023_1199440 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11113080 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. – notice: 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.21037/qims-20-611 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2223-4306 |
EndPage | 1599 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC7930676 33816193 10_21037_qims_20_611 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | 53G AAKDD AAYXX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CITATION DIK HYE OK1 RPM M~E NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-d2cad0e3b5a215b18d2d1729f192cdf0448b5f7daa95a34d5c389c3cb28a9eb33 |
ISSN | 2223-4292 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 14:04:18 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 14:15:34 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:53:48 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:30:33 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:54:12 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | objective analysis automated processing Meibography image multiparametric evaluation |
Language | English |
License | 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c384t-d2cad0e3b5a215b18d2d1729f192cdf0448b5f7daa95a34d5c389c3cb28a9eb33 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 These authors contributed equally to this work. ORCID: 0000-0002-2860-0249. |
OpenAccessLink | https://qims.amegroups.com/article/viewFile/59057/pdf |
PMID | 33816193 |
PQID | 2508888787 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7930676 proquest_miscellaneous_2508888787 pubmed_primary_33816193 crossref_primary_10_21037_qims_20_611 crossref_citationtrail_10_21037_qims_20_611 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-4-00 2021-Apr 20210401 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2021 text: 2021-4-00 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | China |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: China |
PublicationTitle | Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Quant Imaging Med Surg |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | AME Publishing Company |
Publisher_xml | – name: AME Publishing Company |
SSID | ssj0000781710 |
Score | 2.3354447 |
Snippet | Meibography is a non-contact imaging technique used by ophthalmologists and eye care practitioners to acquire information on the characteristics of meibomian... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 1586 |
SubjectTerms | Original |
Title | An automated and multiparametric algorithm for objective analysis of meibography images |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33816193 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2508888787 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7930676 |
Volume | 11 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bb9MwFLaqISFe0LiXm4wET1UgVzt5rBAwIQ0JadMKL5Gdy5pptdmaPLBfwU_m-BLXLUMavEStL0ma7-u5xOccI_SagLyLo4oFqnZZkFJeBDnjIAwJY4xELQv13oCHX8jBcfp5kS0mk19e1NLQ87fV1bV5Jf-DKrQBripL9h-QdSeFBvgM-MIREIbjjTCeixkbeglGZ6MrrtrwQKYCrlTl_Rk7P5Xg_S9XOppQ8jMj3mDsphTJqum4rVs961YgXta-wfp1YELnoalpqtvmwIxr8vqyay-3GsBbdEya2F-rFlXAz6Cbvi-lOL1aysEZ0I0RNt-Gi24z-sS-xf4EvT8HS2D7biKOvJAWLcKU8RGoDbGMtvHakpBsyeDI41rqCdQoGytl269mO6VdwR_b2gEX3WodaIc42ii4cVF_R--5aETwg_T8Us0u47AkKln8VkypXvgf3_9o3U7ziOoSF-6nmWwKfYJ33uW37Zw_nJfdGFzPqDnaR3etN4Lnhlr30KQR99HtQ4vtA3QyF9gxDAPUeIdh2DEMA8OwYxgeGYZliz2GYcOwh-j444ej9weB3YojqJI87YM6rlgdNgnPGNiIPMrruAbTt2jBQajqNgQnn2ctrRkrMpakdQbTiiqpeJyzouFJ8gjtCSmaJwjTkPK24GlBOGhpeKBt3iq_RSV1k4wXUzQbH1xZ2Tr1aruU8_I6nKbojRv9w9Rn-cu4VyMGJQhQtSrGRCMH6FcuCqjanE7RY4OJO1OiltXBxZkiuoWWG6CKs2_3iG6pi7SD3gNDkDy94f09Q3c2f6DnaK-_HJoXYO72_KVm4G93ybD7 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An+automated+and+multiparametric+algorithm+for+objective+analysis+of+meibography+images&rft.jtitle=Quantitative+imaging+in+medicine+and+surgery&rft.au=Xiao%2C+Peng&rft.au=Luo%2C+Zhongzhou&rft.au=Deng%2C+Yuqing&rft.au=Wang%2C+Gengyuan&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.issn=2223-4292&rft.eissn=2223-4306&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1586&rft.epage=1599&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037%2Fqims-20-611&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_21037_qims_20_611 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2223-4292&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2223-4292&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2223-4292&client=summon |