Millennial's perspective of clicker technology in a nursing classroom: A Mixed methods research study
Nursing education is facing challenges and a shift in paradigm within the nursing classroom. Educators need to explore innovative strategies that engage students. Clickers are one tool that can enhance participation, protect anonymity, and promote learning of concepts. This mixed methods study evalu...
Saved in:
Published in | Nurse education today Vol. 62; pp. 80 - 84 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Scotland
Elsevier Ltd
01.03.2018
Elsevier Science Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Nursing education is facing challenges and a shift in paradigm within the nursing classroom. Educators need to explore innovative strategies that engage students. Clickers are one tool that can enhance participation, protect anonymity, and promote learning of concepts.
This mixed methods study evaluated nursing student's perceptions of clicker technology during lecture. This study uses a 9-item questionnaire to explore perceived levels of student perception of the technology of clickers in a nursing classroom.
The sample consisted of ninety-nine sophomore and senior level nursing students. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling.
Ninety-one percent of the students agreed or strongly agreed that the use of clickers helped them to develop a better understanding of the subject matter when compared to traditional lecture based class.
The findings portray a positive correlation of learning and an enhanced pedagogical approach for nursing students.
•The use of clickers reveals a positive correlation of learning and enhanced pedagogical approach.•Millennials desire active pedagogies in the classroom.•Engagement of learners is essential to the millennial generation.•Clicker technology promotes learning of key concepts. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Nursing education is facing challenges and a shift in paradigm within the nursing classroom. Educators need to explore innovative strategies that engage students. Clickers are one tool that can enhance participation, protect anonymity, and promote learning of concepts.BACKGROUNDNursing education is facing challenges and a shift in paradigm within the nursing classroom. Educators need to explore innovative strategies that engage students. Clickers are one tool that can enhance participation, protect anonymity, and promote learning of concepts.This mixed methods study evaluated nursing student's perceptions of clicker technology during lecture. This study uses a 9-item questionnaire to explore perceived levels of student perception of the technology of clickers in a nursing classroom.METHODS/DATA SOURCESThis mixed methods study evaluated nursing student's perceptions of clicker technology during lecture. This study uses a 9-item questionnaire to explore perceived levels of student perception of the technology of clickers in a nursing classroom.The sample consisted of ninety-nine sophomore and senior level nursing students. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling.PARTICIPANTSThe sample consisted of ninety-nine sophomore and senior level nursing students. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling.Ninety-one percent of the students agreed or strongly agreed that the use of clickers helped them to develop a better understanding of the subject matter when compared to traditional lecture based class.RESULTSNinety-one percent of the students agreed or strongly agreed that the use of clickers helped them to develop a better understanding of the subject matter when compared to traditional lecture based class.The findings portray a positive correlation of learning and an enhanced pedagogical approach for nursing students.CONCLUSIONThe findings portray a positive correlation of learning and an enhanced pedagogical approach for nursing students. Nursing education is facing challenges and a shift in paradigm within the nursing classroom. Educators need to explore innovative strategies that engage students. Clickers are one tool that can enhance participation, protect anonymity, and promote learning of concepts. This mixed methods study evaluated nursing student's perceptions of clicker technology during lecture. This study uses a 9-item questionnaire to explore perceived levels of student perception of the technology of clickers in a nursing classroom. The sample consisted of ninety-nine sophomore and senior level nursing students. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling. Ninety-one percent of the students agreed or strongly agreed that the use of clickers helped them to develop a better understanding of the subject matter when compared to traditional lecture based class. The findings portray a positive correlation of learning and an enhanced pedagogical approach for nursing students. •The use of clickers reveals a positive correlation of learning and enhanced pedagogical approach.•Millennials desire active pedagogies in the classroom.•Engagement of learners is essential to the millennial generation.•Clicker technology promotes learning of key concepts. Nursing education is facing challenges and a shift in paradigm within the nursing classroom. Educators need to explore innovative strategies that engage students. Clickers are one tool that can enhance participation, protect anonymity, and promote learning of concepts. This mixed methods study evaluated nursing student's perceptions of clicker technology during lecture. This study uses a 9-item questionnaire to explore perceived levels of student perception of the technology of clickers in a nursing classroom. The sample consisted of ninety-nine sophomore and senior level nursing students. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling. Ninety-one percent of the students agreed or strongly agreed that the use of clickers helped them to develop a better understanding of the subject matter when compared to traditional lecture based class. The findings portray a positive correlation of learning and an enhanced pedagogical approach for nursing students. Background: Nursing education is facing challenges and a shift in paradigm within the nursing classroom. Educators need to explore innovative strategies that engage students. Clickers are one tool that can enhance participation, protect anonymity, and promote learning of concepts. Methods/Data sources: This mixed methods study evaluated nursing student's perceptions of clicker technology during lecture. This study uses a 9-item questionnaire to explore perceived levels of student perception of the technology of clickers in a nursing classroom. Participants: The sample consisted of ninety-nine sophomore and senior level nursing students. Participants were recruited using convenience sampling. Results: Ninety-one percent of the students agreed or strongly agreed that the use of clickers helped them to develop a better understanding of the subject matter when compared to traditional lecture based class. Conclusion: The findings portray a positive correlation of learning and an enhanced pedagogical approach for nursing students. |
Author | Toothaker, Rebecca |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Rebecca surname: Toothaker fullname: Toothaker, Rebecca email: rtoothak@bloomu.edu organization: 709 Walnut Lane, MarLin, PA 17951, United States |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29306750$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kb1uFDEUhS0URDaBF6BAlihIM4N_dvyD0kQRAaRENFBbHs-drJcZe7E9Efv2eLVJkyKVi_t9V9fnnKGTEAMg9J6SlhIqPm_bAENpGaGypawlTL5CK9px1jCp-QlaESZIIzSVp-gs5y0hREnG36BTpjkRsiMrBHd-miAEb6dPGe8g5R244h8AxxG7ybs_kHABtwlxivd77AO2OCwp-3Bf5zbnFOP8BV_hO_8PBjxD2cQh4wQZbHIbnMsy7N-i16OdMrx7fM_R75uvv66_N7c_v_24vrptHFfr0giuRyYUcKa1pD0nWrPRuVF0ureiW1tXJ6xXzlFtLTAnaf2G4mRQfD3Knp-ji-PeXYp_F8jFzD47mCYbIC7ZUK10tyaCiop-fIZu45JCvc4wIhRhhKkD9eGRWvoZBrNLfrZpb54CrIA6Ai7FmgWMxvlii4-hJOsnQ4k5dGW25tCVOXRlKDO1q6qyZ-rT9hely6MENcYHD8lk5yE4GHyqxZkh-pf0_yMcrIA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_teln_2022_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nepr_2023_103595 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2022_11_018 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11040578 crossref_primary_10_1080_08874417_2024_2347540 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2021_104930 crossref_primary_10_1590_1518_8345_3374_3418 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12912_023_01499_z crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17218267 crossref_primary_10_1080_00325481_2023_2234273 crossref_primary_10_1097_01_NEP_0000000000000944 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12912_021_00575_6 crossref_primary_10_29252_rme_11_4_35 crossref_primary_10_4102_curationis_v45i1_2261 crossref_primary_10_1097_CIN_0000000000000565 crossref_primary_10_1097_CIN_0000000000000665 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecns_2022_05_001 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0220388 |
Cites_doi | 10.3928/01484834-20131014-01 10.3928/01484834-20160114-12 10.1007/s11528-014-0786-x 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824642fd 10.3928/01484834-20170123-11 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.010 10.1891/1078-4535.23.1.24 10.3928/01484834-20151016-08 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132987 10.5480/10-451 10.5480/14-1462 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.12.009 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31825a875a 10.3928/02793695-20150728-06 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.017 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2017 Elsevier Ltd Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2018 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2017 Elsevier Ltd – notice: Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. – notice: Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2018 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ ASE FPQ K6X NAPCQ 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) British Nursing Index British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present) British Nursing Index Nursing & Allied Health Premium MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Nursing & Allied Health Premium British Nursing Index Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Nursing & Allied Health Premium |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Nursing |
EISSN | 1532-2793 |
EndPage | 84 |
ExternalDocumentID | 29306750 10_1016_j_nedt_2017_12_027 S0260691717303258 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .~1 0R~ 123 1B1 1RT 1~. 1~5 29N 3EH 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM 9JO AABNK AABSN AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFJI AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AAWTL AAXUO ABBQC ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABLJU ABLVK ABMAC ABMMH ABMZM ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACJTP ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD AEBSH AEFWE AEKER AENEX AFKWA AFTJW AFXBA AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AIEXJ AIKHN AISVY AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AJRQY AKYCK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ANZVX AOMHK ASPBG AVARZ AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CAG COF COPKO CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 F5P FAFAN FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IAO IEA IER IHE IHR INR J1W KOM LCYCR M29 M2W M41 MO0 N9A NAHTW O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PQQKQ PRBVW Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAE SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SNG SNH SPCBC SSB SSH SSO SSZ T5K UHS UV1 WUQ XFK YCJ ZXP ~G- AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACIEU ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIGII AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU APXCP CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QJ ASE EFKBS FPQ K6X NAPCQ 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-639f268e329971b30992fccf659ba654ac3292b8cc19aae2c71067830d834f7b3 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0260-6917 1532-2793 |
IngestDate | Tue Aug 05 10:11:23 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 12:45:14 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:27:49 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:44:16 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:52:57 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:36:18 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Keywords | Millennials Nursing education Classroom response systems Nursing student Clickers |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c384t-639f268e329971b30992fccf659ba654ac3292b8cc19aae2c71067830d834f7b3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
PMID | 29306750 |
PQID | 2068020286 |
PQPubID | 38005 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1989540616 proquest_journals_2068020286 pubmed_primary_29306750 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_nedt_2017_12_027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nedt_2017_12_027 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_nedt_2017_12_027 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | March 2018 2018-03-00 2018-Mar 20180301 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2018 text: March 2018 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Scotland |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Scotland – name: Edinburgh |
PublicationTitle | Nurse education today |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Nurse Educ Today |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Elsevier Science Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier Science Ltd |
References | Montenery, Walker, Sorensen, Thompson, Kirklin, White, Ross (bb0075) 2013; 34 Mains, Cofrancesco, Milner, Shah, Goldberg (bb0065) 2015; 91 Dale (bb0015) 1969 Harvey (bb0050) 2015; 54 Kaylor (bb0060) 2016; 55 Shatto, Erwin (bb0085) 2017; 23 Stephens, Gunther (bb0090) 2016; 37 Boctor (bb0005) 2013; 13 Gale (bb0035) 2015 DeGagne (bb0025) 2011; 8 Stevens, McDermott, Boland, Pawlikowska, Humphreys (bb0095) 2017; 17 Han (bb0045) 2014; 17 Mareno, Bremner, Emerson (bb1000) 2010; 32 Roche, Wingo, Willig (bb0080) 2017; 56 Welch (bb0100) 2013; 52 Zhang, Creswell (bb0110) 2013; 51 West (bb0105) 2014; 58 Mawhiter, Garafola (bb0070) 2016; 12 Johanson (bb0055) 2012; 37 Daniel, Tivener (bb0020) 2016; 19 Garwood (bb0040) 2015; 53 Efstathiou, Bailey (bb0030) 2012; 32 Boctor (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0005) 2013; 13 Mains (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0065) 2015; 91 Daniel (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0020) 2016; 19 Gale (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0035) Welch (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0100) 2013; 52 Shatto (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0085) 2017; 23 Montenery (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0075) 2013; 34 Stephens (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0090) 2016; 37 Johanson (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0055) 2012; 37 Mareno (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb1000) 2010; 32 Zhang (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0110) 2013; 51 Stevens (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0095) 2017; 17 Dale (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0015) 1969 Han (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0045) 2014; 17 West (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0105) 2014; 58 Efstathiou (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0030) 2012; 32 Garwood (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0040) 2015; 53 DeGagne (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0025) 2011; 8 Mawhiter (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0070) 2016; 12 Harvey (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0050) 2015; 54 Kaylor (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0060) 2016; 55 Roche (10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0080) 2017; 56 |
References_xml | – year: 2015 ident: bb0035 article-title: Forget Gen Y: Are You Ready for Gen Z? – volume: 52 start-page: 52 year: 2013 end-page: 61 ident: bb0100 article-title: Effectiveness of classroom response systems within an active learning environment publication-title: J. Nurs. Educ. – volume: 32 year: 2010 ident: bb1000 article-title: The use of audience response systems in nursing education: Best practice guidelines publication-title: Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh. – volume: 37 start-page: 23 year: 2016 end-page: 27 ident: bb0090 article-title: Twitter, millennials, and nursing education research publication-title: Nurs. Educ. Perspect. – volume: 54 start-page: 655 year: 2015 end-page: 658 ident: bb0050 article-title: Connecting theory to practice: using guided questions to standardize clinical postconference publication-title: J. Nurs. Educ. – volume: 55 year: 2016 ident: bb0060 article-title: Fishing for pharmacology success: gaming as an active learning strategy publication-title: J. Nurs. Educ. – volume: 34 start-page: 405 year: 2013 end-page: 409 ident: bb0075 article-title: Millennial generation student nurses’ perceptions of the impact of multiple technologies on learning publication-title: Nurs. Educ. Perspect. – volume: 58 start-page: 53 year: 2014 end-page: 61 ident: bb0105 article-title: Communities of innovation: individual, groups, and organizational characteristics leading to greater potential for innovation publication-title: TechTrends – volume: 51 year: 2013 ident: bb0110 article-title: The use of “mixing” procedures of mixed methods in health services research publication-title: Med. Care – volume: 37 start-page: 173 year: 2012 end-page: 175 ident: bb0055 article-title: Teaching the millennial generation publication-title: Consider, Nurs. Educ. – volume: 23 start-page: 24 year: 2017 end-page: 28 ident: bb0085 article-title: Teaching millennials and generation Z: bridging the generation divide publication-title: Creat. Nurs. – volume: 17 start-page: 150 year: 2014 end-page: 168 ident: bb0045 article-title: Closing the missing links and opening the relationships among the factors: a literature review on the use of clicker technology using the 3P model publication-title: Educ. Technol. Soc. – volume: 53 start-page: 38 year: 2015 end-page: 43 ident: bb0040 article-title: Millennial students' preferred methods for learning concepts in psychiatric nursing publication-title: J. Psychosoc. Nurs. Ment. Health Serv. – year: 1969 ident: bb0015 article-title: Audio-Visual Methods in Teaching – volume: 13 start-page: 96 year: 2013 end-page: 100 ident: bb0005 article-title: Active-learning strategies: the use of a game to reinforce learning in nursing education. A case study publication-title: Nurse Educ. Pract. – volume: 8 start-page: 76 year: 2011 end-page: 87 ident: bb0025 article-title: Use of classroom “clickers” to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills publication-title: Nurse Educ. Pract. – volume: 19 year: 2016 ident: bb0020 article-title: Effects of sharing clickers in an active learning environment publication-title: J. Educ. Technol. Soc. – volume: 12 start-page: 132 year: 2016 end-page: 136 ident: bb0070 article-title: Expect the unexpected: simulation games as a teaching strategy publication-title: Clin. Simul. Nurs. – volume: 56 start-page: 124 year: 2017 ident: bb0080 article-title: Kaizen: an innovative team learning experience for first-semester nursing students publication-title: J. Nurs. Educ. – volume: 32 start-page: 91 year: 2012 end-page: 95 ident: bb0030 article-title: Promoting active learning using audience response systems in large bioscience classes publication-title: Nurse Educ. Today – volume: 91 start-page: 361 year: 2015 end-page: 367 ident: bb0065 article-title: Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Postgrad. Med. J. – volume: 17 year: 2017 ident: bb0095 article-title: A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching? publication-title: BMC Med. Educ. – volume: 52 start-page: 52 issue: 11 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0100 article-title: Effectiveness of classroom response systems within an active learning environment publication-title: J. Nurs. Educ. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20131014-01 – volume: 55 issue: 2 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0060 article-title: Fishing for pharmacology success: gaming as an active learning strategy publication-title: J. Nurs. Educ. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20160114-12 – volume: 58 start-page: 53 issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0105 article-title: Communities of innovation: individual, groups, and organizational characteristics leading to greater potential for innovation publication-title: TechTrends doi: 10.1007/s11528-014-0786-x – volume: 51 issue: 8 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0110 article-title: The use of “mixing” procedures of mixed methods in health services research publication-title: Med. Care doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824642fd – volume: 56 start-page: 124 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0080 article-title: Kaizen: an innovative team learning experience for first-semester nursing students publication-title: J. Nurs. Educ. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20170123-11 – volume: 13 start-page: 96 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0005 article-title: Active-learning strategies: the use of a game to reinforce learning in nursing education. A case study publication-title: Nurse Educ. Pract. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.010 – year: 1969 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0015 – volume: 23 start-page: 24 issue: 1 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0085 article-title: Teaching millennials and generation Z: bridging the generation divide publication-title: Creat. Nurs. doi: 10.1891/1078-4535.23.1.24 – volume: 19 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0020 article-title: Effects of sharing clickers in an active learning environment publication-title: J. Educ. Technol. Soc. – volume: 54 start-page: 655 issue: 11 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0050 article-title: Connecting theory to practice: using guided questions to standardize clinical postconference publication-title: J. Nurs. Educ. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20151016-08 – ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0035 – volume: 17 start-page: 150 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0045 article-title: Closing the missing links and opening the relationships among the factors: a literature review on the use of clicker technology using the 3P model publication-title: Educ. Technol. Soc. – volume: 8 start-page: 76 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0025 article-title: Use of classroom “clickers” to promote acquisition of advanced reasoning skills publication-title: Nurse Educ. Pract. – volume: 91 start-page: 361 issue: 1077 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0065 article-title: Do questions help? The impact of audience response systems on medical student learning: a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Postgrad. Med. J. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132987 – volume: 17 issue: 70 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0095 article-title: A comparative study: do “clickers” increase student engagement in multidisciplinary clinical microbiology teaching? publication-title: BMC Med. Educ. – volume: 34 start-page: 405 issue: 6 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0075 article-title: Millennial generation student nurses’ perceptions of the impact of multiple technologies on learning publication-title: Nurs. Educ. Perspect. doi: 10.5480/10-451 – volume: 37 start-page: 23 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0090 article-title: Twitter, millennials, and nursing education research publication-title: Nurs. Educ. Perspect. doi: 10.5480/14-1462 – volume: 12 start-page: 132 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0070 article-title: Expect the unexpected: simulation games as a teaching strategy publication-title: Clin. Simul. Nurs. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.12.009 – volume: 37 start-page: 173 issue: 4 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0055 article-title: Teaching the millennial generation publication-title: Consider, Nurs. Educ. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31825a875a – volume: 53 start-page: 38 issue: 9 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0040 article-title: Millennial students' preferred methods for learning concepts in psychiatric nursing publication-title: J. Psychosoc. Nurs. Ment. Health Serv. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20150728-06 – volume: 32 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb1000 article-title: The use of audience response systems in nursing education: Best practice guidelines publication-title: Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Scholarsh. – volume: 32 start-page: 91 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027_bb0030 article-title: Promoting active learning using audience response systems in large bioscience classes publication-title: Nurse Educ. Today doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.017 |
SSID | ssj0008723 |
Score | 2.2825959 |
Snippet | Nursing education is facing challenges and a shift in paradigm within the nursing classroom. Educators need to explore innovative strategies that engage... Background: Nursing education is facing challenges and a shift in paradigm within the nursing classroom. Educators need to explore innovative strategies that... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 80 |
SubjectTerms | Academic Performance Adult Classroom response systems Classrooms Clickers Correlation Education, Nursing Educational Technology - instrumentation Female Humans Influence of Technology Information technology Learning Male Medical education Millennials Mixed methods research Nursing Nursing education Nursing Education Research Nursing student Nursing Students Nursing theory Qualitative research Quantitative analysis Questionnaires Sampling Students Students, Nursing - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Teaching methods Technology |
Title | Millennial's perspective of clicker technology in a nursing classroom: A Mixed methods research study |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.12.027 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29306750 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2068020286 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1989540616 |
Volume | 62 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEB5CSksvpU1fm6RBhUIPxV1bkmU7tyU0bFs2lzaQm9CTOgTv0t1AT_ntmbHlDYE2h14tCYvRSPON9M0MwIeyET56SoXo6JnRRZHZPMSMVyZwaxtf5RTgvDhT83P57aK82IGTMRaGaJXp7B_O9P60Tl-mSZrTVdtOf1A2LIXeRoFKKnhJAb9SVqTln2_uaB511Zd4o84Z9U6BMwPHC08y4lMWVX8lSJVl_m6c_gU-eyN0-hyeJfTIZsMEX8BO6PbgySK9j-_B4-T8v4TQB_l1HarXxzVb3YVUsmVk7qolNgXbbO_VWdsxwxIPANsTpD5mM7Zo_wTPhkrTa5aSA_1ifV7aV3B--uXnyTxLJRUyJ2q5yRCPRK7qINAKVYUViA95dC6qsrFGldI4bOG2dq5oDK6WqyjFXC1yXwsZKytew2637MJbYFLlJkjv0eVqZMO9UVQXznkbm8JGYydQjLLULuUbp7IXV3okll1qkr8m-euCa5T_BD5tx6yGbBsP9i7HJdL3dEajOXhw3OG4njrt2DW2qxqhM6_VBN5vm3Gv0QOK6cLyeq2JX1YSAsI-bwY92E4TYRM5X_n-f07qAJ7i3-VAXzuE3c3v6_AO8c7GHvUKfQSPZl-_z89uAXMU_ok |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Nb9QwEB2VraBcEJSvhQJGQuKAok3sxHG4rSqqLe3uhVbqzbIdWwRV2VV3K_HzmUmcICTogWvGlqzxeOY5nnkD8KGoRB1qokJ09Mzogkhs6kPCS-O5tVVdplTgvFzJxWX-9aq42oPjoRaG0iqj7-99euet45dZ1OZs0zSzb8SGJfG2kaGRCl6oe7BP7FTFBPbnp2eL1eiQVdl1eaPxCU2ItTN9mhc6M0qpzMruryA1l_l7fPoX_uzi0MljeBQBJJv3a3wCe749hAfL-ER-CPfj_f8p-K7Or23Rwj5u2eZ3VSVbB-auG0qoYLvx1zprWmZYTAVAeUTVn9mcLZufvmZ9s-kti_xA31lHTfsMLk--XBwvkthVIXFC5bsEIUngUnmBgajMrECIyINzQRaVNbLIjUMJt8q5rDK4Ya4kljkl0lqJPJRWPIdJu279S2C5TI3P6xpvXVVe8dpIag3nahuqzAZjp5ANutQuUo5T54trPeSW_dCkf0361xnXqP8pfBrnbHrCjTtHF8MW6T_MRmNEuHPe0bCfOh7aLcqlQvTMlZzC-1GMx43eUEzr17dbTSlmBYEgHPOit4NxmYic6P6VvvrPRb2Dg8XF8lyfn67OXsNDlKg-2-0IJrubW_8G4c_Ovo3m_QsrHQFG |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Millennial%27s+perspective+of+clicker+technology+in+a+nursing+classroom%3A+A+Mixed+methods+research+study&rft.jtitle=Nurse+education+today&rft.au=Toothaker%2C+Rebecca&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.issn=1532-2793&rft.eissn=1532-2793&rft.volume=62&rft.spage=80&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.nedt.2017.12.027&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0260-6917&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0260-6917&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0260-6917&client=summon |