Comparing size measurements of simulated colorectal polyp size and morphology groups when using a virtual scale endoscope or visual size estimation: Blinded randomized controlled trial
Objectives The virtual scale endoscope (VSE) allows projection of a virtual scale onto colorectal polyps allowing real‐time size measurements. We studied the relative accuracy of VSE compared to visual assessment (VA) for the measuring simulated polyps of different size and morphology groups. Method...
Saved in:
Published in | Digestive endoscopy Vol. 35; no. 5; pp. 638 - 644 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Australia
01.07.2023
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objectives
The virtual scale endoscope (VSE) allows projection of a virtual scale onto colorectal polyps allowing real‐time size measurements. We studied the relative accuracy of VSE compared to visual assessment (VA) for the measuring simulated polyps of different size and morphology groups.
Methods
We conducted a blinded randomized controlled trial using simulated polyps within a colon model. Sixty simulated polyps were evenly distributed across four size groups (1–5, >5–9.9, 10–19.9, and ≥20 mm) and three Paris morphology groups (flat, sessile, and pedunculated). Six endoscopists performed polyp size measurements using random allocation of either VA or VSE.
Results
A total of 359 measurements were completed. The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all size groups >5 mm (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P < 0.001). For polyps ≤5 mm, the relative accuracy of VSE compared to VA was not significantly higher (P = 0.186). The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all morphology groups. VSE misclassified a lower percentage of >5 mm polyps as ≤5 mm (2.9%), ≥10 mm polyps as <10 mm (5.5%), and ≥20 mm polyps as <20 mm (21.7%) compared to VA (11.2%, 24.7%, and 52.3% respectively; P = 0.008, P < 0.001, and P = 0.003).
Conclusion
Virtual scale endoscope had significantly higher relative accuracies for every polyp size group or morphology type aside from diminutive. VSE enables the endoscopist to better classify polyps into correct size categories at clinically relevant size thresholds of 5, 10, and 20 mm. |
---|---|
AbstractList | OBJECTIVESThe virtual scale endoscope (VSE) allows projection of a virtual scale onto colorectal polyps allowing real-time size measurements. We studied the relative accuracy of VSE compared to visual assessment (VA) for the measuring simulated polyps of different size and morphology groups. METHODSWe conducted a blinded randomized controlled trial using simulated polyps within a colon model. Sixty simulated polyps were evenly distributed across four size groups (1-5, >5-9.9, 10-19.9, and ≥20 mm) and three Paris morphology groups (flat, sessile, and pedunculated). Six endoscopists performed polyp size measurements using random allocation of either VA or VSE. RESULTSA total of 359 measurements were completed. The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all size groups >5 mm (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P < 0.001). For polyps ≤5 mm, the relative accuracy of VSE compared to VA was not significantly higher (P = 0.186). The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all morphology groups. VSE misclassified a lower percentage of >5 mm polyps as ≤5 mm (2.9%), ≥10 mm polyps as <10 mm (5.5%), and ≥20 mm polyps as <20 mm (21.7%) compared to VA (11.2%, 24.7%, and 52.3% respectively; P = 0.008, P < 0.001, and P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONVirtual scale endoscope had significantly higher relative accuracies for every polyp size group or morphology type aside from diminutive. VSE enables the endoscopist to better classify polyps into correct size categories at clinically relevant size thresholds of 5, 10, and 20 mm. The virtual scale endoscope (VSE) allows projection of a virtual scale onto colorectal polyps allowing real-time size measurements. We studied the relative accuracy of VSE compared to visual assessment (VA) for the measuring simulated polyps of different size and morphology groups. We conducted a blinded randomized controlled trial using simulated polyps within a colon model. Sixty simulated polyps were evenly distributed across four size groups (1-5, >5-9.9, 10-19.9, and ≥20 mm) and three Paris morphology groups (flat, sessile, and pedunculated). Six endoscopists performed polyp size measurements using random allocation of either VA or VSE. A total of 359 measurements were completed. The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all size groups >5 mm (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P < 0.001). For polyps ≤5 mm, the relative accuracy of VSE compared to VA was not significantly higher (P = 0.186). The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all morphology groups. VSE misclassified a lower percentage of >5 mm polyps as ≤5 mm (2.9%), ≥10 mm polyps as <10 mm (5.5%), and ≥20 mm polyps as <20 mm (21.7%) compared to VA (11.2%, 24.7%, and 52.3% respectively; P = 0.008, P < 0.001, and P = 0.003). Virtual scale endoscope had significantly higher relative accuracies for every polyp size group or morphology type aside from diminutive. VSE enables the endoscopist to better classify polyps into correct size categories at clinically relevant size thresholds of 5, 10, and 20 mm. Objectives The virtual scale endoscope (VSE) allows projection of a virtual scale onto colorectal polyps allowing real‐time size measurements. We studied the relative accuracy of VSE compared to visual assessment (VA) for the measuring simulated polyps of different size and morphology groups. Methods We conducted a blinded randomized controlled trial using simulated polyps within a colon model. Sixty simulated polyps were evenly distributed across four size groups (1–5, >5–9.9, 10–19.9, and ≥20 mm) and three Paris morphology groups (flat, sessile, and pedunculated). Six endoscopists performed polyp size measurements using random allocation of either VA or VSE. Results A total of 359 measurements were completed. The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all size groups >5 mm ( P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P < 0.001). For polyps ≤5 mm, the relative accuracy of VSE compared to VA was not significantly higher ( P = 0.186). The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all morphology groups. VSE misclassified a lower percentage of >5 mm polyps as ≤5 mm (2.9%), ≥10 mm polyps as <10 mm (5.5%), and ≥20 mm polyps as <20 mm (21.7%) compared to VA (11.2%, 24.7%, and 52.3% respectively; P = 0.008, P < 0.001, and P = 0.003). Conclusion Virtual scale endoscope had significantly higher relative accuracies for every polyp size group or morphology type aside from diminutive. VSE enables the endoscopist to better classify polyps into correct size categories at clinically relevant size thresholds of 5, 10, and 20 mm. Objectives The virtual scale endoscope (VSE) allows projection of a virtual scale onto colorectal polyps allowing real‐time size measurements. We studied the relative accuracy of VSE compared to visual assessment (VA) for the measuring simulated polyps of different size and morphology groups. Methods We conducted a blinded randomized controlled trial using simulated polyps within a colon model. Sixty simulated polyps were evenly distributed across four size groups (1–5, >5–9.9, 10–19.9, and ≥20 mm) and three Paris morphology groups (flat, sessile, and pedunculated). Six endoscopists performed polyp size measurements using random allocation of either VA or VSE. Results A total of 359 measurements were completed. The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all size groups >5 mm (P = 0.004, P < 0.001, P < 0.001). For polyps ≤5 mm, the relative accuracy of VSE compared to VA was not significantly higher (P = 0.186). The relative accuracy of VSE was significantly higher when compared to VA for all morphology groups. VSE misclassified a lower percentage of >5 mm polyps as ≤5 mm (2.9%), ≥10 mm polyps as <10 mm (5.5%), and ≥20 mm polyps as <20 mm (21.7%) compared to VA (11.2%, 24.7%, and 52.3% respectively; P = 0.008, P < 0.001, and P = 0.003). Conclusion Virtual scale endoscope had significantly higher relative accuracies for every polyp size group or morphology type aside from diminutive. VSE enables the endoscopist to better classify polyps into correct size categories at clinically relevant size thresholds of 5, 10, and 20 mm. |
Author | Renteln, Daniel Panzini, Benoit Abou Khalil, Maria Haumesser, Claire Popescu Crainic, Ioana Taghiakbari, Mahsa Djinbachian, Roupen Sidani, Sacha Zarandi‐Nowroozi, Melissa Liu Chen Kiow, Jeremy |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Claire surname: Haumesser fullname: Haumesser, Claire organization: University of Montreal Medical School – sequence: 2 givenname: Melissa surname: Zarandi‐Nowroozi fullname: Zarandi‐Nowroozi, Melissa organization: Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM) – sequence: 3 givenname: Mahsa surname: Taghiakbari fullname: Taghiakbari, Mahsa organization: Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM) – sequence: 4 givenname: Roupen surname: Djinbachian fullname: Djinbachian, Roupen organization: Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM) – sequence: 5 givenname: Maria surname: Abou Khalil fullname: Abou Khalil, Maria organization: Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM) – sequence: 6 givenname: Sacha surname: Sidani fullname: Sidani, Sacha organization: Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM) – sequence: 7 givenname: Jeremy surname: Liu Chen Kiow fullname: Liu Chen Kiow, Jeremy organization: Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM) – sequence: 8 givenname: Benoit surname: Panzini fullname: Panzini, Benoit organization: Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM) – sequence: 9 givenname: Ioana surname: Popescu Crainic fullname: Popescu Crainic, Ioana organization: University of Montreal Medical School – sequence: 10 givenname: Daniel surname: Renteln fullname: Renteln, Daniel email: danielrenteln@gmail.com organization: Montreal University Hospital Center (CHUM) |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36514183$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kctuFDEQRS0URCaPBT8QeQmLTlz9dnYwJAEpgk2ybnnc1RMjPzp2N9HwZXweNemEHd6UVff4lu17xA588MjYexDnQOuiR38OZSnbN2xFtcigruGArYSEKqvqojpkRyn9FAJyWZbv2GFRV1BCW6zYn3Vwo4rGb3kyv5E7VGmO6NBPiYeBmm62asKe62BDRD0py8dgd-PCK99zF-L4QOp2x7cxzGPiTw_o-Zz2ror_MnGa6VTSyiJH34ekw4g8RJLSs7J3wjQZpyYT_CX_bI3vaWYk--BI3Y_3UwzW0naKRtkT9nZQNuHpSz1m99dXd-uv2e2Pm2_rT7eZLtqyzRpU2GotCt3KXA-yqUE3UuewATmA3IiG5rQSBzFU9IG9yEFIrFqBG9BKNMUx-7D4jjE8znTJzpmk0VrlMcypy5uqrERegCT044LqGFKKOHRjpCfFXQei2wfVUVDdc1DEnr3YzhuH_T_yNRkCLhbgyVjc_d-p-3L1fbH8C7K1pGw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2210_0635 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002623 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2036_7533 crossref_primary_10_1080_00365521_2024_2308519 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2022_328654 crossref_primary_10_1002_deo2_386 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2248_1385 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2023_330727 crossref_primary_10_14309_ajg_0000000000002494 |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826dd138 10.1016/S0016-5107(94)70162-8 10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70003-8 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01870.x 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.036 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3220 10.1055/s-0033-1344394 10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.096002 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.010 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.623 10.1111/den.14351 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.006 10.1038/ajg.2013.302 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.026 10.1016/j.dld.2010.12.015 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.082 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.030 10.3748/wjg.v28.i19.2137 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/den.14498 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1443-1661 |
EndPage | 644 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1111_den_14498 36514183 DEN14498 |
Genre | article Randomized Controlled Trial Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Fonds de Recherche du Québec Santé Career Development Award – fundername: PRogramme d’Excellence en Médecine pour l’Initiation En Recherche – PREMIER – fundername: PRogramme d'Excellence en Médecine pour l'Initiation En Recherche - PREMIER |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29G 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DTERQ DU5 EAD EAP EBD EBS EJD EMK EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH ZZTAW ~IA ~WT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3848-7eae8cc03c892cf9761c79c21b19f19b07ded89ef0f5498d02109e580eb1ca073 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0915-5635 |
IngestDate | Sat Aug 17 03:51:58 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 01:43:18 EDT 2024 Wed Oct 16 00:38:45 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:53:57 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 5 |
Keywords | colorectal cancer polyp size estimation colonoscopy endoscope colonic polyp |
Language | English |
License | 2022 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3848-7eae8cc03c892cf9761c79c21b19f19b07ded89ef0f5498d02109e580eb1ca073 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/den.14498 |
PMID | 36514183 |
PQID | 2754502319 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 644 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2754502319 crossref_primary_10_1111_den_14498 pubmed_primary_36514183 wiley_primary_10_1111_den_14498_DEN14498 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | July 2023 2023-Jul 2023-07-00 20230701 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2023 text: July 2023 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Australia |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Australia |
PublicationTitle | Digestive endoscopy |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Dig Endosc |
PublicationYear | 2023 |
References | 2010; 12 2021; 26 2013; 108 2013; 56 2013; 45 1993; 88 1997; 46 2015; 21 2022; 34 2011; 43 2014; 79 2022; 96 2016; 83 2022; 20 2020; 158 2018; 16 1994; 40 2022; 28 2009; 29 2016; 22 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 Rubio CA (e_1_2_7_11_1) 2009; 29 Fennerty MB (e_1_2_7_15_1) 1993; 88 |
References_xml | – volume: 108 start-page: 1593 year: 2013 end-page: 600 article-title: Cold snare polypectomy vs. cold forceps polypectomy using double‐biopsy technique for removal of diminutive colorectal polyps: A prospective randomized study publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 12 start-page: 646 year: 2010 end-page: 50 article-title: Endoscopists' estimation of size should not determine surveillance of colonic polyps publication-title: Colorectal Dis – volume: 79 start-page: 402 year: 2014 end-page: 7 article-title: Variable interpretation of polyp size by using open forceps by experienced colonoscopists publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 34 start-page: 1471 year: 2022 end-page: 7 article-title: Estimating colorectal polyp size with a virtual scale endoscope and visual estimation during colonoscopy: Prospective, preliminary comparison of accuracy publication-title: Dig Endosc – volume: 40 start-page: 174 year: 1994 end-page: 6 article-title: How accurate are endoscopic estimates of size? publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 83 start-page: 812 year: 2016 end-page: 6 article-title: Use of a novel polyp “ruler snare” improves estimation of colon polyp size publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 26 start-page: 096002 year: 2021 article-title: Virtual scale function of gastrointestinal endoscopy for accurate polyp size estimation in real‐time: A preliminary study publication-title: J Biomed Opt – volume: 158 start-page: 1131 year: 2020 end-page: 53.e5 article-title: Recommendations for follow‐up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: A consensus update by the US Multi‐Society Task Force on colorectal cancer publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 22 start-page: 3220 year: 2016 end-page: 6 article-title: Is forceps more useful than visualization for measurement of colon polyp size? publication-title: World J Gastroenterol – volume: 16 start-page: 706 year: 2018 end-page: 14 article-title: Simplifying resect and discard strategies for real‐time assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 20 start-page: 1163 year: 2022 end-page: 70 article-title: A comparison of incomplete resection rate of large and small colorectal polyps by cold snare polypectomy publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol – volume: 88 start-page: 496 year: 1993 end-page: 500 article-title: Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable? publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 56 start-page: 315 year: 2013 end-page: 21 article-title: Endoscopic mis‐sizing of polyps changes colorectal cancer surveillance recommendations publication-title: Dis Colon Rectum – volume: 28 start-page: 2137 year: 2022 end-page: 47 article-title: Non‐optical polyp‐based resect and discard strategy: A prospective clinical study publication-title: World J Gastroenterol – volume: 96 start-page: 330 year: 2022 end-page: 8 article-title: Cold versus hot snare resection with or without submucosal injection of 6‐ to 15‐mm colorectal polyps: A randomized controlled trial publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 21 start-page: 623 year: 2015 end-page: 8 article-title: Use of disposable graduated biopsy forceps improves accuracy of polyp size measurements during endoscopy publication-title: World J Gastroenterol – volume: 46 start-page: 497 year: 1997 end-page: 502 article-title: Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate? publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 43 start-page: 391 year: 2011 end-page: 4 article-title: Graduated injection needles and snares for polypectomy are useful for measuring colorectal polyp size publication-title: Dig Liver Dis – volume: 45 start-page: 1024 year: 2013 end-page: 9 article-title: Complete biopsy resection of diminutive polyps publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 29 start-page: 1539 year: 2009 end-page: 45 article-title: Assessing the size of polyp phantoms in tandem colonoscopies publication-title: Anticancer Res – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31826dd138 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(94)70162-8 – volume: 29 start-page: 1539 year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 article-title: Assessing the size of polyp phantoms in tandem colonoscopies publication-title: Anticancer Res contributor: fullname: Rubio CA – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70003-8 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01870.x – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.036 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i11.3220 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344394 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.096002 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.11.010 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i2.623 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1111/den.14351 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.03.006 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.302 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.10.026 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2010.12.015 – volume: 88 start-page: 496 year: 1993 ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 article-title: Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable? publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol contributor: fullname: Fennerty MB – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.08.082 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.030 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i19.2137 |
SSID | ssj0012944 |
Score | 2.4221377 |
Snippet | Objectives
The virtual scale endoscope (VSE) allows projection of a virtual scale onto colorectal polyps allowing real‐time size measurements. We studied the... The virtual scale endoscope (VSE) allows projection of a virtual scale onto colorectal polyps allowing real-time size measurements. We studied the relative... OBJECTIVESThe virtual scale endoscope (VSE) allows projection of a virtual scale onto colorectal polyps allowing real-time size measurements. We studied the... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 638 |
SubjectTerms | colonic polyp Colonic Polyps - diagnosis Colonic Polyps - surgery Colonoscopy colorectal cancer Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery endoscope Endoscopes Humans polyp size estimation |
Title | Comparing size measurements of simulated colorectal polyp size and morphology groups when using a virtual scale endoscope or visual size estimation: Blinded randomized controlled trial |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fden.14498 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36514183 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2754502319 |
Volume | 35 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEB5VPSAuPAsEKBqqHri48tu7cCpNqwqpPVSt1AOStd5dtxGJHcUJiP4yfh4zu3FoWiEhbpbXGTuamZ1vd2e-AdhNrLQ6TYsgV5IWKNpkgcpFFtSaglsRa20Ub-ifnObHF-mXy-xyAz71tTCeH2K14cae4eZrdnBVdbecnNySTyYlF_pGScHpXMOzFXUUhTHXyJXCYRZkFFWXrEKcxbP65Xosugcw1_GqCzhHj-Fr_6k-z-Tb3mJe7embOyyO__lfnsCjJRDFfW85T2HDNs_gwcnyqP05_DrwHQqbK-xGNxYnfzYTO2xrujnhzl_WIPNe87xJ0qbt-OfUP68ag5OWtOj27dFVj3T449o2yLn2V6jw-2jG1SvYkZ1YtI1pXY0MtjMa6twIS2IeEF9g-RE_j5ne0SBFWNNOaJRf75Ltx3TpWpBswcXR4fnBcbBs8xDoRKQiKKyyQusw0ULGuiZ8FOlC6jiqIllHsgoLkiukrcOaFrPC8CpV2kyEFGa0oinqBWw2bWNfAeo6zEVcpxHBnFSpqEozgn9amUoJqap0ADu9wsupZ_Mo-1UQ6aB0OhjA-94USvI1PkBRjW0XXRkXhDeZME8O4KW3kZWYJCfoSfPjAD44Tf9dfjk8PHUXr__90TfwkPvc-zzht7A5ny3sNqGhefXOmf1v77cK6g |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,1378,27936,27937,46306,46730 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEB6VIgEX3tDwHBAHLq789i7iAn0oQJMDaqVekLXeXZeqiR3FCYj-Mn4eM7txoCAkxM3yOmNHs7Pz7ezMNwAvEiutTtMiyJWkDYo2WaBykQW1JudWxFobxQH90TgfHqXvj7PjDXjd18J4foh1wI0tw63XbOAckP7Fysku-WhSiktwmcw94cYNux_X5FHkyFwrV3KIWZCRX13xCnEez_qnF73RHxDzImJ1Lmf_BnzqP9ZnmpxtLxfVtj7_jcfxf__NTbi-wqL4xk-eW7Bhm9twZbQ6bb8D33d8k8LmBLvTc4vTn_HEDtuabk65-Zc1yNTXvHSStFk7-Tbzz6vG4LQlRbrQPboCkg6_frYNcrr9CSr8cjrnAhbsaKpYtI1pXZkMtnMa6twIS2IqEF9j-QrfTpjh0SA5WdNOaZRf7_LtJ3TpupDchaP9vcOdYbDq9BDoRKQiKKyyQusw0ULGuiaIFOlC6jiqIllHsgoLkiukrcOa9rPC8EZV2kyE5Gm0olXqHmw2bWO3AHUd5iKu04iQTqpUVKUZIUCtTKWEVFU6gOe9xsuZJ_Qo-40Q6aB0OhjAs34ulGRufIaiGtsuuzIuCHIyZ54cwH0_SdZikpzQJy2RA3jpVP13-eXu3thdPPj3R5_C1eHh6KA8eDf-8BCucdt7nzb8CDYX86V9TOBoUT1xNvADcpsPAg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VVqq4QMujLOVhEAcuqZKsk9jlBG1X5dEVQlTqASly_CgVu8lqs1tEf1l_XmfszUJBSIhbFDuTROPxfLZnvgF40bfSas6LKFcSFyjaZJHKRRY5jc6tSLU2ijb0j4b54TF_d5KdrMCrLhcm8EMsN9zIMvx8TQY-Me4XI0ezpJNJKW7AGs8R-RIi-rTkjkI_5iu5oj_Mogzd6oJWiMJ4lo9ed0Z_IMzrgNV7nMFt-NJ9awg0-bYzn1U7-uI3Gsf__JkNuLVAoux1GDqbsGLrO7B-tDhrvwuXe6FEYX3K2rMLy8Y_dxNb1ji8OabSX9YwIr6miROlTZrRj0nor2rDxg2q0W_cM58-0rLvX23NKNj-lCl2fjal9BXW4kCxzNam8UkyrJliU-tbSBIRgYQMy132ZkT8joahizXNGFvp9T7afoSXvgbJPTgeHHzeO4wWdR4i3RdcRIVVVmgd97WQqXYIkBJdSJ0mVSJdIqu4QLlCWhc7XM0KQ8tUaTMRo5_RCueo-7BaN7V9AEy7OBep4wniHK5UUvEM8Z9WplJCqor34Hmn8HIS6DzKbhmEOii9DnrwrBsKJRobnaCo2jbztkwLBJzEmCd7sBXGyFJMP0fsiRNkD156Tf9dfrl_MPQXD_-961NY_7g_KD-8Hb7fhptU8z7EDD-C1dl0bh8jMppVT7wFXAFNWw2x |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+size+measurements+of+simulated+colorectal+polyp+size+and+morphology+groups+when+using+a+virtual+scale+endoscope+or+visual+size+estimation%3A+Blinded+randomized+controlled+trial&rft.jtitle=Digestive+endoscopy&rft.au=Haumesser%2C+Claire&rft.au=Zarandi-Nowroozi%2C+Melissa&rft.au=Taghiakbari%2C+Mahsa&rft.au=Djinbachian%2C+Roupen&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.eissn=1443-1661&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=638&rft.epage=644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fden.14498&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0915-5635&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0915-5635&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0915-5635&client=summon |