Multiple testing procedures based on weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics for right-censored survival data

In clinical trials or drug development studies, researchers are often interested in identifying which treatments or dosages are more effective than the standard one. Recently, several multiple testing procedures based on weighted logrank tests have been proposed to compare several treatments with a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistics in medicine Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 23 - 35
Main Author Chi, Yunchan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 15.01.2005
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In clinical trials or drug development studies, researchers are often interested in identifying which treatments or dosages are more effective than the standard one. Recently, several multiple testing procedures based on weighted logrank tests have been proposed to compare several treatments with a control in a one‐way layout where survival data are subject to random right‐censorship. However, weighted logrank tests are based on ranks, and these tests might not be sensitive to the magnitude of the difference in survival times against a specific alternative. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a more robust and powerful multiple testing procedure. This paper proposes multiple testing procedures based on two‐sample weighted Kaplan–Meier statistics, each comparing an individual treatment with the control, to determine which treatments are more effective than the control. The comparative results from a simulation study are presented and the implementation of these methods to the prostate cancer clinical trial and the renal carcinoma tumour study are presented. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
AbstractList In clinical trials or drug development studies, researchers are often interested in identifying which treatments or dosages are more effective than the standard one. Recently, several multiple testing procedures based on weighted logrank tests have been proposed to compare several treatments with a control in a one-way layout where survival data are subject to random right-censorship. However, weighted logrank tests are based on ranks, and these tests might not be sensitive to the magnitude of the difference in survival times against a specific alternative. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a more robust and powerful multiple testing procedure. This paper proposes multiple testing procedures based on two-sample weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics, each comparing an individual treatment with the control, to determine which treatments are more effective than the control. The comparative results from a simulation study are presented and the implementation of these methods to the prostate cancer clinical trial and the renal carcinoma tumour study are presented. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
In clinical trials or drug development studies, researchers are often interested in identifying which treatments or dosages are more effective than the standard one. Recently, several multiple testing procedures based on weighted logrank tests have been proposed to compare several treatments with a control in a one-way layout where survival data are subject to random right-censorship. However, weighted logrank tests are based on ranks, and these tests might not be sensitive to the magnitude of the difference in survival times against a specific alternative. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a more robust and powerful multiple testing procedure. This paper proposes multiple testing procedures based on two-sample weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics, each comparing an individual treatment with the control, to determine which treatments are more effective than the control. The comparative results from a simulation study are presented and the implementation of these methods to the prostate cancer clinical trial and the renal carcinoma tumour study are presented.In clinical trials or drug development studies, researchers are often interested in identifying which treatments or dosages are more effective than the standard one. Recently, several multiple testing procedures based on weighted logrank tests have been proposed to compare several treatments with a control in a one-way layout where survival data are subject to random right-censorship. However, weighted logrank tests are based on ranks, and these tests might not be sensitive to the magnitude of the difference in survival times against a specific alternative. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a more robust and powerful multiple testing procedure. This paper proposes multiple testing procedures based on two-sample weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics, each comparing an individual treatment with the control, to determine which treatments are more effective than the control. The comparative results from a simulation study are presented and the implementation of these methods to the prostate cancer clinical trial and the renal carcinoma tumour study are presented.
In clinical trials or drug development studies, researchers are often interested in identifying which treatments or dosages are more effective than the standard one. Recently, several multiple testing procedures based on weighted logrank tests have been proposed to compare several treatments with a control in a one‐way layout where survival data are subject to random right‐censorship. However, weighted logrank tests are based on ranks, and these tests might not be sensitive to the magnitude of the difference in survival times against a specific alternative. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a more robust and powerful multiple testing procedure. This paper proposes multiple testing procedures based on two‐sample weighted Kaplan–Meier statistics, each comparing an individual treatment with the control, to determine which treatments are more effective than the control. The comparative results from a simulation study are presented and the implementation of these methods to the prostate cancer clinical trial and the renal carcinoma tumour study are presented. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
In clinical trials or drug development studies, researchers are often interested in identifying which treatments or dosages are more effective than the standard one. Recently, several multiple testing procedures based on weighted logrank tests have been proposed to compare several treatments with a control in a one-way layout where survival data are subject to random right-censorship. However, weighted logrank tests are based on ranks, and these tests might not be sensitive to the magnitude of the difference in survival times against a specific alternative. Therefore, it is desirable to develop a more robust and powerful multiple testing procedure. This paper proposes multiple testing procedures based on two-sample weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics, each comparing an individual treatment with the control, to determine which treatments are more effective than the control. The comparative results from a simulation study are presented and the implementation of these methods to the prostate cancer clinical trial and the renal carcinoma tumour study are presented.
Author Chi, Yunchan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yunchan
  surname: Chi
  fullname: Chi, Yunchan
  email: ycchi@email.stat.ncku.edu.tw
  organization: Department of Statistics, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701, R.O.C
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15515153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp10U1PGzEQBmCroiqBVuIXIItDxWWDP9br5YhQCVGTUIlWPVqOPZuabtbB3k3Iv69XoUgEIR_swzMjz7xH6KDxDSB0QsmQEsIuolsOqeT8AxpQcikzwkR5gAaESZkVkopDdBTjAyGUCiY_oUMqBE2HD1A17erWrWrALcTWNQu8Ct6A7QJEPNcRLPYN3oBb_GnT-7te1brJpuAg4Njq1qUiE3HlAw69yQw00YdEYxfWbq1rbHWrP6OPla4jfHm-j9Gvm28_r2-zyd1ofH01yQwvc57ZCnItRV4SQYktheGsoDYXRItCWim10GCstHzObCGoAQZ5lVeMzQ3ThJf8GH3d9U1TPHZpIrV00UCdPg2-i6qQPGeyZAme7cEH34Um_U0xxikvi1ImdPqMuvkSrFoFt9Rhq_6vL4HhDpjgYwxQKeP6pfimDdrVihLV56NSPqrPJxWc7xW89HxLsx3duBq27zp1P56-9ikSeHrxOvztp5ZC_Z6N1D0d_SB8MlMz_g_dua3-
CODEN SMEDDA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_1740774512455464
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_9574_2012_00535_x
crossref_primary_10_1080_00949650903451769
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_csda_2015_10_001
Cites_doi 10.2307/2527654
10.2307/2531492
10.2307/2347670
10.1093/jnci/88.1.38
10.1214/aos/1176344247
10.1093/biomet/63.3.655
10.1002/j.1538-7305.1962.tb02419.x
10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01827.x
10.1080/00401706.1972.10488991
10.1016/0021-9681(77)90037-6
10.1111/j.1467-9574.1991.tb01307.x
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<353::AID-SIM333>3.0.CO;2-B
10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.203
10.2307/2344317
10.1080/03610919408813152
10.1214/aoms/1177704004
10.1145/138351.138375
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jan 15, 2005
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
– notice: 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
– notice: Copyright John Wiley and Sons, Limited Jan 15, 2005
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1002/sim.1733
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Statistics
Public Health
EISSN 1097-0258
EndPage 35
ExternalDocumentID 784853771
15515153
10_1002_sim_1733
SIM1733
ark_67375_WNG_S1GP03LN_N
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Feature
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Science Council of Taiwan
  funderid: NSC89‐2115‐M‐006‐021
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
31~
33P
3SF
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5RE
5VS
66C
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPVW
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACPOU
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHMBA
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
CS3
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HBH
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
JPC
KQQ
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OIG
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
ROL
RWI
RX1
SUPJJ
TN5
UB1
V2E
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WIB
WIH
WIK
WJL
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WWH
WXSBR
WYISQ
XBAML
XG1
XV2
YHZ
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAHQN
AAMNL
AANHP
AAYCA
ACRPL
ACYXJ
ADNMO
AFWVQ
ALVPJ
AAYXX
AEYWJ
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3843-dfe4a75480510d85c3261d450a567d77a5aecd7d3b2d651ce2e4f4f22bc2a0383
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0277-6715
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 22:36:15 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 04:05:33 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:50:03 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:32:56 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:04 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:25:43 EST 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:53:14 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1
2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3843-dfe4a75480510d85c3261d450a567d77a5aecd7d3b2d651ce2e4f4f22bc2a0383
Notes National Science Council of Taiwan - No. NSC89-2115-M-006-021
ark:/67375/WNG-S1GP03LN-N
istex:E36BDE57B687AE21169C65A28683B5536D461284
ArticleID:SIM1733
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
PMID 15515153
PQID 223138687
PQPubID 48361
PageCount 13
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_67342782
proquest_journals_223138687
pubmed_primary_15515153
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_sim_1733
crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_1733
wiley_primary_10_1002_sim_1733_SIM1733
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_S1GP03LN_N
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2005-01-15
15 January 2005
2005-Jan-15
20050115
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2005-01-15
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2005
  text: 2005-01-15
  day: 15
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Chichester, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Chichester, UK
– name: England
– name: New York
PublicationTitle Statistics in medicine
PublicationTitleAlternate Statist. Med
PublicationYear 2005
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References Nelson W. Theory and applications of hazard plotting for censored failure data. Technometrics 1972; 14:945-965.
Chen YI. A generalized Steel's procedure for comparing several treatments with a control under random right-censorship. Communication in Statistics Simulation 1994; 23:1-16.
Pepe MS, Fleming TR. Weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics: a class of distance tests for censored survival data. Biometrics 1989; 45:497-507.
Steel RGD. A multiple comparison rank sum test: treatments versus control. Biometrics 1959; 15:560-572.
Prentice RL. Linear rank tests with right-censored data. Biometrika 1978; 65:165-179.
Byar DP, Corle DK. Selecting optimal treatment in clinical trials using covariate information. Chronic Diseases 1977; 30:445-469.
Aalen OO. Nonparametric inference for a family of counting processes. Annual of Statistics 1978; 6:701-726.
Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 1966; 50:163-170.
Gehan EA. A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika 1965; 52:203-223.
Gupta SS. Probability integrals of multivariate normal and multivariate t. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1963; 34:792-828.
Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimator from incomplete observations. Journal of American Statistical Association 1958; 53:457-481.
Chen YI. Multiple comparisons in carcinogenesis study with right-censored survival data. Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19:353-367.
Marcus R, Peritz E, Gabriel KR. On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 1976; 63:655-660.
Drezner Z. Computation of the Multivariate normal integral. Transactions on Mathematical Software 1992; 19:470-480.
Wigginton JM, Komschlies KL, Back TC, Franco JL, Brunda MJ, Wiltrout RH. Administration of interleukin 12 with pulse interleukin 2 and the rapid and complete eradication of murine renal carcinoma. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1996; 88:38-43.
Peto R, Peto J. Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures (with discussion). Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A 1972; 135:185-206.
Fleming TR, Harrington DP. A class of hypothesis tests for one and two-samples of censored data. Communication in Statistics 1981; 10:131-139.
Schervish MJ. Multivariate Normal Probabilities with error bound. Applied Statistics 1984; 33:81-94.
Pepe MS, Fleming TR. Weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics: large sample and optimality considerations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1991; 53:342-352.
Chakraborti S, Desu MM. Linear rank tests for comparing treatments with a control when data are subject to unequal patterns of censorship. Statistical Neerlandica 1991; 45:227-254.
Slepian D. The one-sided barrier problem for Gaussain noise. Bell System Technical Journal 1962; 41:463-501.
Byar DP, Green SB. The choice of treatment for cancer patients based on covariate information: application to prostate cancer. Bulletin Du Cancer 1980; 67:477-488.
1965; 52
1976; 63
2000; 19
1989; 45
1963; 34
1991; 45
2000
1978; 65
1980; 67
1991; 53
1984; 33
1994; 23
1958; 53
1992; 19
1977; 30
1962; 41
1972; 14
1972; 135
1959; 15
1981; 10
1978; 6
1966; 50
1996; 88
Slepian (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB4) 1962; 41
Pepe (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB12) 1989; 45
Steel (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB7) 1959; 15
Chen (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB8) 2000; 19
Mantel (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB15) 1966; 50
Nelson (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB10) 1972; 14
Peto (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB17) 1972; 135
Schervish (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB19) 1984; 33
Chen (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB6) 1994; 23
Aalen (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB11) 1978; 6
Drezner (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB22) 1992; 19
Kaplan (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB14) 1958; 53
Prentice (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB18) 1978; 65
Pepe (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB13) 1991; 53
Marcus (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB9) 1976; 63
Byar (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB2) 1980; 67
Gupta (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB21) 1963; 34
Wigginton (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB23) 1996; 88
Byar (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB1) 1977; 30
Gehan (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB5) 1965; 52
Fleming (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB16) 1981; 10
Chakraborti (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB3) 1991; 45
Chi (10.1002/sim.1733-BIB20) 2000
References_xml – reference: Gupta SS. Probability integrals of multivariate normal and multivariate t. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1963; 34:792-828.
– reference: Gehan EA. A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika 1965; 52:203-223.
– reference: Prentice RL. Linear rank tests with right-censored data. Biometrika 1978; 65:165-179.
– reference: Byar DP, Green SB. The choice of treatment for cancer patients based on covariate information: application to prostate cancer. Bulletin Du Cancer 1980; 67:477-488.
– reference: Pepe MS, Fleming TR. Weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics: a class of distance tests for censored survival data. Biometrics 1989; 45:497-507.
– reference: Peto R, Peto J. Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures (with discussion). Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A 1972; 135:185-206.
– reference: Slepian D. The one-sided barrier problem for Gaussain noise. Bell System Technical Journal 1962; 41:463-501.
– reference: Pepe MS, Fleming TR. Weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics: large sample and optimality considerations. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1991; 53:342-352.
– reference: Schervish MJ. Multivariate Normal Probabilities with error bound. Applied Statistics 1984; 33:81-94.
– reference: Aalen OO. Nonparametric inference for a family of counting processes. Annual of Statistics 1978; 6:701-726.
– reference: Fleming TR, Harrington DP. A class of hypothesis tests for one and two-samples of censored data. Communication in Statistics 1981; 10:131-139.
– reference: Chakraborti S, Desu MM. Linear rank tests for comparing treatments with a control when data are subject to unequal patterns of censorship. Statistical Neerlandica 1991; 45:227-254.
– reference: Chen YI. A generalized Steel's procedure for comparing several treatments with a control under random right-censorship. Communication in Statistics Simulation 1994; 23:1-16.
– reference: Chen YI. Multiple comparisons in carcinogenesis study with right-censored survival data. Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19:353-367.
– reference: Marcus R, Peritz E, Gabriel KR. On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 1976; 63:655-660.
– reference: Wigginton JM, Komschlies KL, Back TC, Franco JL, Brunda MJ, Wiltrout RH. Administration of interleukin 12 with pulse interleukin 2 and the rapid and complete eradication of murine renal carcinoma. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1996; 88:38-43.
– reference: Byar DP, Corle DK. Selecting optimal treatment in clinical trials using covariate information. Chronic Diseases 1977; 30:445-469.
– reference: Nelson W. Theory and applications of hazard plotting for censored failure data. Technometrics 1972; 14:945-965.
– reference: Drezner Z. Computation of the Multivariate normal integral. Transactions on Mathematical Software 1992; 19:470-480.
– reference: Steel RGD. A multiple comparison rank sum test: treatments versus control. Biometrics 1959; 15:560-572.
– reference: Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimator from incomplete observations. Journal of American Statistical Association 1958; 53:457-481.
– reference: Mantel N. Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemotherapy Reports 1966; 50:163-170.
– volume: 33
  start-page: 81
  year: 1984
  end-page: 94
  article-title: Multivariate Normal Probabilities with error bound
  publication-title: Applied Statistics
– volume: 88
  start-page: 38
  year: 1996
  end-page: 43
  article-title: Administration of interleukin 12 with pulse interleukin 2 and the rapid and complete eradication of murine renal carcinoma
  publication-title: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
– volume: 19
  start-page: 470
  year: 1992
  end-page: 480
  article-title: Computation of the Multivariate normal integral
  publication-title: Transactions on Mathematical Software
– volume: 53
  start-page: 457
  year: 1958
  end-page: 481
  article-title: Nonparametric estimator from incomplete observations
  publication-title: Journal of American Statistical Association
– volume: 67
  start-page: 477
  year: 1980
  end-page: 488
  article-title: The choice of treatment for cancer patients based on covariate information: application to prostate cancer
  publication-title: Bulletin Du Cancer
– volume: 34
  start-page: 792
  year: 1963
  end-page: 828
  article-title: Probability integrals of multivariate normal and multivariate t
  publication-title: Annals of Mathematical Statistics
– volume: 6
  start-page: 701
  year: 1978
  end-page: 726
  article-title: Nonparametric inference for a family of counting processes
  publication-title: Annual of Statistics
– volume: 15
  start-page: 560
  year: 1959
  end-page: 572
  article-title: A multiple comparison rank sum test: treatments versus control
  publication-title: Biometrics
– year: 2000
– volume: 45
  start-page: 227
  year: 1991
  end-page: 254
  article-title: Linear rank tests for comparing treatments with a control when data are subject to unequal patterns of censorship
  publication-title: Statistical Neerlandica
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1
  year: 1994
  end-page: 16
  article-title: A generalized Steel's procedure for comparing several treatments with a control under random right‐censorship
  publication-title: Communication in Statistics Simulation
– volume: 53
  start-page: 342
  year: 1991
  end-page: 352
  article-title: Weighted Kaplan–Meier statistics: large sample and optimality considerations
  publication-title: Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B
– volume: 65
  start-page: 165
  year: 1978
  end-page: 179
  article-title: Linear rank tests with right‐censored data
  publication-title: Biometrika
– volume: 45
  start-page: 497
  year: 1989
  end-page: 507
  article-title: Weighted Kaplan–Meier statistics: a class of distance tests for censored survival data
  publication-title: Biometrics
– volume: 50
  start-page: 163
  year: 1966
  end-page: 170
  article-title: Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration
  publication-title: Cancer Chemotherapy Reports
– volume: 135
  start-page: 185
  year: 1972
  end-page: 206
  article-title: Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures (with discussion)
  publication-title: Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A
– volume: 14
  start-page: 945
  year: 1972
  end-page: 965
  article-title: Theory and applications of hazard plotting for censored failure data
  publication-title: Technometrics
– volume: 10
  start-page: 131
  year: 1981
  end-page: 139
  article-title: A class of hypothesis tests for one and two‐samples of censored data
  publication-title: Communication in Statistics
– volume: 30
  start-page: 445
  year: 1977
  end-page: 469
  article-title: Selecting optimal treatment in clinical trials using covariate information
  publication-title: Chronic Diseases
– volume: 52
  start-page: 203
  year: 1965
  end-page: 223
  article-title: A generalized Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly‐censored samples
  publication-title: Biometrika
– volume: 19
  start-page: 353
  year: 2000
  end-page: 367
  article-title: Multiple comparisons in carcinogenesis study with right‐censored survival data
  publication-title: Statistics in Medicine
– volume: 63
  start-page: 655
  year: 1976
  end-page: 660
  article-title: On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance
  publication-title: Biometrika
– volume: 41
  start-page: 463
  year: 1962
  end-page: 501
  article-title: The one‐sided barrier problem for Gaussain noise
  publication-title: Bell System Technical Journal
– volume: 15
  start-page: 560
  year: 1959
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB7
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.2307/2527654
– volume: 45
  start-page: 497
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB12
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.2307/2531492
– volume: 10
  start-page: 131
  year: 1981
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB16
  publication-title: Communication in Statistics
– volume: 33
  start-page: 81
  year: 1984
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB19
  publication-title: Applied Statistics
  doi: 10.2307/2347670
– volume: 88
  start-page: 38
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB23
  publication-title: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.1.38
– volume: 6
  start-page: 701
  year: 1978
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB11
  publication-title: Annual of Statistics
  doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344247
– volume: 63
  start-page: 655
  year: 1976
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB9
  publication-title: Biometrika
  doi: 10.1093/biomet/63.3.655
– volume: 67
  start-page: 477
  year: 1980
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB2
  publication-title: Bulletin Du Cancer
– volume: 41
  start-page: 463
  year: 1962
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB4
  publication-title: Bell System Technical Journal
  doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1962.tb02419.x
– volume: 50
  start-page: 163
  year: 1966
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB15
  publication-title: Cancer Chemotherapy Reports
– volume: 53
  start-page: 457
  year: 1958
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB14
  publication-title: Journal of American Statistical Association
  doi: 10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
– volume: 53
  start-page: 342
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB13
  publication-title: Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B
  doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1991.tb01827.x
– volume: 14
  start-page: 945
  year: 1972
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB10
  publication-title: Technometrics
  doi: 10.1080/00401706.1972.10488991
– volume: 30
  start-page: 445
  year: 1977
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB1
  publication-title: Chronic Diseases
  doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(77)90037-6
– volume: 45
  start-page: 227
  year: 1991
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB3
  publication-title: Statistical Neerlandica
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9574.1991.tb01307.x
– volume: 65
  start-page: 165
  year: 1978
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB18
  publication-title: Biometrika
– volume: 19
  start-page: 353
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB8
  publication-title: Statistics in Medicine
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<353::AID-SIM333>3.0.CO;2-B
– year: 2000
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB20
– volume: 52
  start-page: 203
  year: 1965
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB5
  publication-title: Biometrika
  doi: 10.1093/biomet/52.1-2.203
– volume: 135
  start-page: 185
  year: 1972
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB17
  publication-title: Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A
  doi: 10.2307/2344317
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB6
  publication-title: Communication in Statistics Simulation
  doi: 10.1080/03610919408813152
– volume: 34
  start-page: 792
  year: 1963
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB21
  publication-title: Annals of Mathematical Statistics
  doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177704004
– volume: 19
  start-page: 470
  year: 1992
  ident: 10.1002/sim.1733-BIB22
  publication-title: Transactions on Mathematical Software
  doi: 10.1145/138351.138375
SSID ssj0011527
Score 1.7683831
Snippet In clinical trials or drug development studies, researchers are often interested in identifying which treatments or dosages are more effective than the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 23
SubjectTerms Administration, Oral
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal - therapeutic use
Carcinoma - drug therapy
Clinical trials
Computer Simulation
Diethylstilbestrol - administration & dosage
Diethylstilbestrol - therapeutic use
Double-Blind Method
Humans
Interleukins - therapeutic use
Kidney Neoplasms - drug therapy
Male
Monte Carlo Method
multiple testing procedure
Prostatic Neoplasms - drug therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic - methods
Research methodology
right-censored data
Survival Analysis
weighted Kaplan-Meier statistic
Title Multiple testing procedures based on weighted Kaplan-Meier statistics for right-censored survival data
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-S1GP03LN-N/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fsim.1733
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15515153
https://www.proquest.com/docview/223138687
https://www.proquest.com/docview/67342782
Volume 24
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ba9VAEF6kBSlIq8dLY72sIPqU0-xuNnv6KGJbLzmItVjwYdlbpBdzyskJik_9CYL_sL_EmdxKpYJIHhLIJGw2MzvfzM5-S8hTjqxqxplYWQkBylZqYysUjzPPWQHut5AG85D5NNvdT98cyIOuqhLXwrT8EEPCDS2jGa_RwI2tNi9IQ6vDr2OmBBJ9YqkW4qEPA3MU63drxRnKTDHZ884mfLN_8JInWsZO_X4VzLyMWhu3s71GPvcNbqtNjsf1wo7djz-4HP_vi26S1Q6N0het-twi10I5Itfzbr59RG60WT3aLlYakRXEpi21821ylHfFiHSBVB3lF9p4Q19DBE_RO3o6K-m3JvcK12_N6Ykpz89-5QFcMa2GN1HAzbRJEpyf_XQQVs_mIF7VMIiBGVCsYb1D9rdffXy5G3dbN8ROTFIR-yKkRiGXHNi8n0gHKJH5VCZGZsorZaQJzisvLPeZZC7wkBZpwbl13CQQNd8lS-WsDOuEirAlhPBSeSshlnfGGiUKlhQFU-DhTUSe979Ru47XHLfXONEtIzPX0K8a-zUiTwbJ05bL4wqZZ40mDAJmfoy1b0rqT9Mdvcd23ifi3VRPI7LRq4ruzL7SgLWYmGQTFZHHw12wV5yEMWWY1RW-C3c34RG51-rXRVMAvMKBTWi05K9t1Huvczzf_1fBDbLSMM4mLGbyAVlazOvwELDUwj5qrOY3p6sdVQ
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1fa9RAEB9qC1oQ_5xaz6pdQfQp1-xuNnvFJ1Hbq70cYlvaB2HZZBOprblyuaD41I8g-A37SZzJv1KpIJKHBDJZNpuZnd_Mbn4D8FwQq5pNrKdjhQHKRhB7sdTCC53gGbrfTFnKQ0aTcLQfvD9Uhwvwqv0XpuaH6BJuZBnVfE0GTgnp9QvW0OLo64BrKa_BEhX0JuL8tx877ije1mulNcpQc9Uyz_pivX3yki9aomH9fhXQvIxbK8ezeRs-tV2u95scD8p5PEh-_MHm-J_vdAduNYCUva416C4spHkPrkfNknsPbtaJPVb_r9SDZYKnNbvzPfgSNfsR2ZzYOvLPrHKIrsQgnpGDdGyas29V-hWvd-zpic3Pz35FKXpjVnQtMYTOrMoTnJ_9TDCyns5QvChxHkNLYLSN9T7sb77bezPymuoNXiKHgfRclgZWE50cmr0bqgSBIneB8q0KtdPaKpsmTjsZC4efL0lFGmRBJkScCOtj4PwAFvNpnj4EJtMNKaVT2sUKw_nExlbLjPtZxjU6eduHl-13NElDbU4VNk5MTcosDI6roXHtw7NO8rSm87hC5kWlCp2AnR3T9jetzMFky-zyrQ--HE_MpA-rra6YxvILg3CLy2E41H1Y6-6iydI6jM3TaVlQW1TgRPRhpVawi64gfsWDulCpyV_7aHa3Izo_-lfBNbgx2ovGZrw92VmF5YqA1uceV49hcT4r0ycIrebx08qEfgNbBiFx
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ta9RAEB60hVIQX863WLUriH7KNbubzd59FNtra3uhWIsFPyybbCLamjsudyh-6k8Q_If9JZ3JW6lUEMmHBDIJm81M5pnZyTMALwWxqtnU-jpRGKAMw8RPpBZ-5ATP0f3mylIechxHO0fhu2N13FRV0r8wNT9El3Ajy6i-12TgU5dvXJKGll--9bmW8iYsh1EwpLYNm-876ijetmulJcpIc9USzwZio73yiitapln9cR3OvApbK78zugOf2hHX5SYn_cU86ac__yBz_L9Hugu3GzjK3tT6cw9uZEUPVsbNgnsPbtVpPVb_rdSDVQKnNbfzffg6bqoR2Zy4OorPrHKHboEhPCP36NikYN-r5Cse79npqS3Oz36PM_TFrOzuxBA4sypLcH72K8W4ejJD8XKBXzG0A0ZFrA_gaLT14e2O3_Ru8FM5CKXv8iy0msjk0OjdQKUIE7kLVWBVpJ3WVtksddrJRLhI8TQTWZiHuRBJKmyAYfNDWComRfYYmMyGUkqntEsUBvOpTayWOQ_ynGt08daD1-1rNGlDbE79NU5NTcksDM6roXn14EUnOa3JPK6ReVVpQidgZydU_KaV-Rhvm0O-fRDI_djEHqy1qmIauy8Ngi0uB9FAe7DenUWDpVUYW2STRUn3ovYmwoNHtX5dDgXRK240hEpL_jpGc7g7pv2TfxVch5WDzZHZ34331mC1Yp8NuM_VU1iazxbZM8RV8-R5ZUAX6jMgIA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiple+testing+procedures+based+on+weighted+Kaplan-Meier+statistics+for+right-censored+survival+data&rft.jtitle=Statistics+in+medicine&rft.au=Chi%2C+Yunchan&rft.date=2005-01-15&rft.issn=0277-6715&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fsim.1733&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F15515153&rft.externalDocID=15515153
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0277-6715&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0277-6715&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0277-6715&client=summon