A multicenter comparison of carvedilol with hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension

The efficacy and safety of carvedilol, a beta-blocker with vasodilatory properties, were compared with that of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) both at a once-daily dose of 25-50 mg in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study. Following a single-blind placebo phase of 3-6 weeks, 201 e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of cardiovascular pharmacology Vol. 18 Suppl 4; p. S51
Main Authors Langdon, C G, Baxter, G A, Young, P H
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 1991
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The efficacy and safety of carvedilol, a beta-blocker with vasodilatory properties, were compared with that of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) both at a once-daily dose of 25-50 mg in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study. Following a single-blind placebo phase of 3-6 weeks, 201 eligible patients (aged 27-88 years) were randomized to receive 8 weeks of treatment with either carvedilol or HCTZ, 25 mg doubling to 50 mg at week 4 if the respone was inadequate. Sitting and standing blood pressure and heart rate were recorded 2 h after the first dose and 24 h postdose at weeks 4 and 8. The analysis included 179 patients (11 having withdrawn, including 5 for adverse events, and 11 excluded for protocol violations). There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between treatment groups. Eighty-six percent of patients in the carvedilol group and 88% in the HCTZ group had an 8-week sitting diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg or decreased by greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg. Safety profiles were similar for both agents, with a tendency to lower uric acid and total cholesterol levels with carvedilol. Carvedilol and HCTZ at doses compared in this study have similar efficacy and tolerability, with laboratory evidence to suggest a more favorable metabolic profile for carvedilol.
AbstractList The efficacy and safety of carvedilol, a beta-blocker with vasodilatory properties, were compared with that of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) both at a once-daily dose of 25-50 mg in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study. Following a single-blind placebo phase of 3-6 weeks, 201 eligible patients (aged 27-88 years) were randomized to receive 8 weeks of treatment with either carvedilol or HCTZ, 25 mg doubling to 50 mg at week 4 if the respone was inadequate. Sitting and standing blood pressure and heart rate were recorded 2 h after the first dose and 24 h postdose at weeks 4 and 8. The analysis included 179 patients (11 having withdrawn, including 5 for adverse events, and 11 excluded for protocol violations). There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between treatment groups. Eighty-six percent of patients in the carvedilol group and 88% in the HCTZ group had an 8-week sitting diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg or decreased by greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg. Safety profiles were similar for both agents, with a tendency to lower uric acid and total cholesterol levels with carvedilol. Carvedilol and HCTZ at doses compared in this study have similar efficacy and tolerability, with laboratory evidence to suggest a more favorable metabolic profile for carvedilol.
Author Langdon, C G
Young, P H
Baxter, G A
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: C G
  surname: Langdon
  fullname: Langdon, C G
  organization: Symons Medical Centre, Berkshire, England
– sequence: 2
  givenname: G A
  surname: Baxter
  fullname: Baxter, G A
– sequence: 3
  givenname: P H
  surname: Young
  fullname: Young, P H
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1721980$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNotkNtKAzEQhnNRqbX6CEJeYDWzmz1dluIJCt70vqTJhI3ksCSpUn15I3ZuBr6f_4OZG7LwwSMhFNgDsLF_ZGXahvMKxhFgYByqQgAWZMWgY1XNeXdNblL6KJS3fbckS-hrGAe2Ij8b6k42G4k-Y6QyuFlEk4KnQVMp4icqY4OlXyZPdDqrGORkQwx5MuLbKKTG0zwhzRFFdkXy13PGqiqHygWFUWSkmFKJjLBFMWPM6JMJ_pZcaWET3l32muyfn_bb12r3_vK23ewq2QzlGBSK1dD0LefHtmsUaESJTHXIda_bgUuhODJkuhPABPaq1mMzslZokKyu1-T-Xzufjg7VYY7GiXg-XH5Q_wIqtWOX
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1136_dtb_1995_33539
crossref_primary_10_1592_phco_21_11_940_34520
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13346_017_0430_3
crossref_primary_10_1345_aph_1K447
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1527_3466_1992_tb00242_x
crossref_primary_10_3109_08037059609062105
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1097/00005344-199118041-00011
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
ExternalDocumentID 1721980
Genre Multicenter Study
Comparative Study
Clinical Trial
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.-D
.55
.GJ
.Z2
01R
0R~
1CY
1J1
3O-
40H
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
77Y
7O~
8L-
AAAAV
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAMTA
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AAYEP
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ACCJW
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACILI
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADFPA
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
AE3
AE6
AEETU
AENEX
AFDTB
AFFNX
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHQNM
AHRYX
AHVBC
AI.
AINUH
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AWKKM
BQLVK
BS7
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
DU5
DUNZO
E.X
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EJD
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
F5P
FCALG
FL-
FRP
FW0
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IN~
IPNFZ
JF9
JG8
JK3
JK8
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
N9A
NPM
N~7
N~B
N~M
O9-
OAG
OAH
OCUKA
ODA
OJAPA
OK1
OL1
OLG
OLH
OLU
OLV
OLW
OLY
OLZ
OPC
OPUJH
ORVUJ
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P-K
P2P
R58
RIG
RLZ
S4R
S4S
T8P
TEORI
TSPGW
V2I
VH1
VVN
W3M
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
X7M
XXN
XYM
YFH
YOC
ZFV
ZGI
ZKB
ZXP
ZZMQN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3841-ead02137544b563d1feece0d6e4f7f584cad4e0e0f6a10ae7d2f93905af1c022
ISSN 0160-2446
IngestDate Sat Sep 28 07:16:42 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3841-ead02137544b563d1feece0d6e4f7f584cad4e0e0f6a10ae7d2f93905af1c022
PMID 1721980
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_1721980
PublicationCentury 1900
PublicationDate 1991-00-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 1991-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – year: 1991
  text: 1991-00-00
PublicationDecade 1990
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Cardiovasc Pharmacol
PublicationYear 1991
SSID ssj0014576
Score 1.4334021
Snippet The efficacy and safety of carvedilol, a beta-blocker with vasodilatory properties, were compared with that of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) both at a once-daily...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage S51
SubjectTerms Adrenergic beta-Antagonists - therapeutic use
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Carbazoles - adverse effects
Carbazoles - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Hydrochlorothiazide - adverse effects
Hydrochlorothiazide - therapeutic use
Hypertension - drug therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Propanolamines - adverse effects
Propanolamines - therapeutic use
Vasodilator Agents - therapeutic use
Title A multicenter comparison of carvedilol with hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1721980
Volume 18 Suppl 4
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS-tAEF6qovgixxteD_sgvtSVpNnm8tgjniOiUrCCb7LZiy1oWrTK0fMb_M9nZrNNYq2ivoSSJaHZ72MyM_lmhpCdQPCGMqmAIEcKxk2Ds1TFCUtkwnVgIiltB77Ts_Dogh9fNi9rtZeKaulhmO7L54l1Jd9BFc4Brlgl-wVki5vCCfgN-MIREIbjpzBu5XpAFFjqOycndyMFseX0I7yYbkYy9O6TwulYEJ4DNj3x3FN6pHEsxeb4sb13o9iwz3BEDraRqGNz8WyIifUuxKx3VvHusHzr1MrX8tZB2Ri7SN2fiOzaTRCpTPb6Jf66ESF_yvRqYYraroZCuXo9v5KecBnL0GPgQ4SvTW7dDi2t84rtPM87z76x6XmvYM-WDXOOyhhsW8d9Zv3Z6iWAzuDWYo2BbZKPiPpwcazXtluZIlNRjEbzDFM_7pMUb9pJhcXzOFnYqAPopP82T2bdHceCFuu8dH6QBQcQbeUUWiQ1nS2RuVOnq1giu-0cqKc92ikL8u736C5tVyBcJv9atEI5WlKO9g0tKUeRcnQC5Wgvo0A5WlAOrxunHC0oR6uUWyGd34edgyPm5ncwGcSwB2CkwIPEGcs8bYaB8o3WUnsq1NxEBjxfKRTXnvZMKHxP6Eg1TBIkXlMYX4JvuUqms36m1wiNjK80eOeBiUMODm6cekYJCS8UEyRCynWymm_v1SDv0XLl9n3jvYVNMl-ydYvMGDAJehv8y2H60-L-H5r0fbo
link.rule.ids 783
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+multicenter+comparison+of+carvedilol+with+hydrochlorothiazide+in+the+treatment+of+mild-to-moderate+essential+hypertension&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+cardiovascular+pharmacology&rft.au=Langdon%2C+C+G&rft.au=Baxter%2C+G+A&rft.au=Young%2C+P+H&rft.date=1991-01-01&rft.issn=0160-2446&rft.volume=18+Suppl+4&rft.spage=S51&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2F00005344-199118041-00011&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F1721980&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F1721980&rft.externalDocID=1721980
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0160-2446&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0160-2446&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0160-2446&client=summon