Constructing accurate cash settlement indices: The role of index specifications

All cash settlement contracts are susceptible to sampling and nonsampling errors, while those that depend on external pricing agents are also subject to the possibility of intentional bias. The proper specification of settlement procedures plays an important role in keeping the various sources of in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe journal of futures markets Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 339 - 360
Main Authors Cita, John, Lien, Donald
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.06.1992
Wiley-Blackwell
Published by J. Wiley in affiliation with the Center for the Study of Futures Markets, Columbia University
Wiley Periodicals Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:All cash settlement contracts are susceptible to sampling and nonsampling errors, while those that depend on external pricing agents are also subject to the possibility of intentional bias. The proper specification of settlement procedures plays an important role in keeping the various sources of index error in check. Contract design features that might be used to mitigate all sources of index inaccuracy are analyzed. Even with a well-designed price monitoring scheme, small errors can go undetected. This highlights the importance of selecting the best possible price aggregation procedure. Compared with all other linear estimators, the simple mean (SIM), in many settings, provides reporting agents with the least incentive to report biased prices. The same can be said about its ability to minimize the influence of nonsampling error. Thus, for most applications, the SIM is the best overall estimator.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-SLJWB0ZF-5
ArticleID:FUT3990120308
istex:E238864B7280A09076E0D911D4D995990A1B27F8
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ISSN:0270-7314
1096-9934
DOI:10.1002/fut.3990120308