Differences in the placebo response in duloxetine and venlafaxine trials

Objective Our analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely duloxetine and venlafaxine, and at analysing a potential influence of the investigated drugs on the placebo response. Method We conducted a com...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa psychiatrica Scandinavica Vol. 137; no. 6; pp. 472 - 480
Main Authors Breilmann, J., Furukawa, T. A., Becker, T., Koesters, M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objective Our analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely duloxetine and venlafaxine, and at analysing a potential influence of the investigated drugs on the placebo response. Method We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis of placebo‐controlled, double‐blind RCTs, which examined the efficacy of duloxetine and venlafaxine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder. Results We included 71 studies (29 duloxetine trials and 43 venlafaxine trials; one study provided data for the duloxetine and the venlafaxine data set). The placebo effect sizes, defined as pre‐postscore change divided by baseline standard deviation, differed significantly between venlafaxine and duloxetine studies (−2.51 vs. −2.09; test for subgroup differences P = 0.028; high heterogeneity). The analysis of effect modifiers and the metaregression analyses confirmed the drug, next to baseline depression severity and publication status, as the most influential independent predictor. Conclusion Our analyses show a significant difference in the placebo response between venlafaxine and duloxetine trials and suggest that the investigated drug has an influence on the placebo response that is not related to baseline severity, changes over the years or other variables we included.
AbstractList ObjectiveOur analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely duloxetine and venlafaxine, and at analysing a potential influence of the investigated drugs on the placebo response.MethodWe conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis of placebo‐controlled, double‐blind RCTs, which examined the efficacy of duloxetine and venlafaxine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.ResultsWe included 71 studies (29 duloxetine trials and 43 venlafaxine trials; one study provided data for the duloxetine and the venlafaxine data set). The placebo effect sizes, defined as pre‐postscore change divided by baseline standard deviation, differed significantly between venlafaxine and duloxetine studies (−2.51 vs. −2.09; test for subgroup differences P = 0.028; high heterogeneity). The analysis of effect modifiers and the metaregression analyses confirmed the drug, next to baseline depression severity and publication status, as the most influential independent predictor.ConclusionOur analyses show a significant difference in the placebo response between venlafaxine and duloxetine trials and suggest that the investigated drug has an influence on the placebo response that is not related to baseline severity, changes over the years or other variables we included.
Objective Our analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely duloxetine and venlafaxine, and at analysing a potential influence of the investigated drugs on the placebo response. Method We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis of placebo‐controlled, double‐blind RCTs, which examined the efficacy of duloxetine and venlafaxine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder. Results We included 71 studies (29 duloxetine trials and 43 venlafaxine trials; one study provided data for the duloxetine and the venlafaxine data set). The placebo effect sizes, defined as pre‐postscore change divided by baseline standard deviation, differed significantly between venlafaxine and duloxetine studies (−2.51 vs. −2.09; test for subgroup differences P = 0.028; high heterogeneity). The analysis of effect modifiers and the metaregression analyses confirmed the drug, next to baseline depression severity and publication status, as the most influential independent predictor. Conclusion Our analyses show a significant difference in the placebo response between venlafaxine and duloxetine trials and suggest that the investigated drug has an influence on the placebo response that is not related to baseline severity, changes over the years or other variables we included.
Our analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely duloxetine and venlafaxine, and at analysing a potential influence of the investigated drugs on the placebo response. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled, double-blind RCTs, which examined the efficacy of duloxetine and venlafaxine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder. We included 71 studies (29 duloxetine trials and 43 venlafaxine trials; one study provided data for the duloxetine and the venlafaxine data set). The placebo effect sizes, defined as pre-postscore change divided by baseline standard deviation, differed significantly between venlafaxine and duloxetine studies (-2.51 vs. -2.09; test for subgroup differences P = 0.028; high heterogeneity). The analysis of effect modifiers and the metaregression analyses confirmed the drug, next to baseline depression severity and publication status, as the most influential independent predictor. Our analyses show a significant difference in the placebo response between venlafaxine and duloxetine trials and suggest that the investigated drug has an influence on the placebo response that is not related to baseline severity, changes over the years or other variables we included.
OBJECTIVEOur analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely duloxetine and venlafaxine, and at analysing a potential influence of the investigated drugs on the placebo response.METHODWe conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled, double-blind RCTs, which examined the efficacy of duloxetine and venlafaxine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.RESULTSWe included 71 studies (29 duloxetine trials and 43 venlafaxine trials; one study provided data for the duloxetine and the venlafaxine data set). The placebo effect sizes, defined as pre-postscore change divided by baseline standard deviation, differed significantly between venlafaxine and duloxetine studies (-2.51 vs. -2.09; test for subgroup differences P = 0.028; high heterogeneity). The analysis of effect modifiers and the metaregression analyses confirmed the drug, next to baseline depression severity and publication status, as the most influential independent predictor.CONCLUSIONOur analyses show a significant difference in the placebo response between venlafaxine and duloxetine trials and suggest that the investigated drug has an influence on the placebo response that is not related to baseline severity, changes over the years or other variables we included.
Author Furukawa, T. A.
Koesters, M.
Breilmann, J.
Becker, T.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: J.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0591-5969
  surname: Breilmann
  fullname: Breilmann, J.
  email: johanna.breilmann@uni-ulm.de
  organization: Bezirkskrankenhaus
– sequence: 2
  givenname: T. A.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2159-3776
  surname: Furukawa
  fullname: Furukawa, T. A.
  organization: Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health
– sequence: 3
  givenname: T.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8179-1219
  surname: Becker
  fullname: Becker, T.
  organization: Bezirkskrankenhaus
– sequence: 4
  givenname: M.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7018-6021
  surname: Koesters
  fullname: Koesters, M.
  organization: Bezirkskrankenhaus
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29603140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kEtLw0AUhQep2Idu_AEScCNC6p1kkswsS31UKCio4C5MJncwJZ3EmUbbf-_UVhcuvJvDPXwcDmdIeqYxSMgphTH1dyVV68Y04pwekAFNAUJgLOuRAQDQMBXw2idD5xb-TSjwI9KPRAoxZTAgs-tKa7RoFLqgMsHqDYO2lgqLJrDo2sY43PplVzdrXFUGA2nK4ANNLbVcb_-VrWTtjsmh9oInex2Rl9ub5-ksnD_c3U8n81DFPKahjopUKd-Jl5SDSjjLENMiTXQBzHuRRJmIQuiECx1DJJNCUBRQ6oQilyIekYtdbmub9w7dKl9WTmFdS4NN5_IIImCCxpB59PwPumg6a3w7T7EsZjwTzFOXO0rZxjmLOm9ttZR2k1PIt_vm233z7309fLaP7Iollr_oz6AeoDvgs6px809UPpk-Pu1CvwCPGoZO
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_JCP_0000000000001506
crossref_primary_10_1111_acps_13235
crossref_primary_10_1111_acps_12974
crossref_primary_10_1111_acps_13337
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jveb_2023_06_004
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyt_2019_00713
crossref_primary_10_1159_000520554
crossref_primary_10_1177_00048674211068793
crossref_primary_10_1111_acps_13293
crossref_primary_10_1177_07067437221115029
crossref_primary_10_1111_acps_13000
Cites_doi 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30307-8
10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12040474
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.005
10.1002/wps.20245
10.1192/bjp.bp.115.173906
10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10391
10.18637/jss.v034.i12
10.1098/rstb.2010.0394
10.1097/YIC.0000000000000174
10.1136/eb-2017-102827
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.06.006
10.1017/S2045796011000837
10.4088/JCP.11r07485
10.1038/npp.1994.63
10.4088/JCP.v67n1111
10.1017/S1461145710000957
10.1001/jama.2009.1943
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.15
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.001
10.18637/jss.v036.i03
10.1192/bjp.134.4.382
10.4088/JCP.10m06191
10.1097/01.NMD.0000061144.16176.38
10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.005
10.1097/JCP.0000000000000796
10.1001/jama.287.14.1840
10.1002/jrsm.1195
10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.029
10.1192/bjp.bp.112.120196
10.1038/npp.2011.306
10.1038/npp.2012.153
10.1017/S1461145711000666
10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x
10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.105
10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
10.1186/1471-2288-2-13
10.1136/jech.52.6.377
10.1371/journal.pone.0066844
10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2044
10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-00008
10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00846-5
10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6
10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00151.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S, Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S, Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DBID NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7TK
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1111/acps.12881
DatabaseName PubMed
CrossRef
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Neurosciences Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)

PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1600-0447
EndPage 480
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_acps_12881
29603140
ACPS12881
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.3N
.55
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
23M
31~
33P
36B
3O-
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACHQT
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AHMBA
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DUUFO
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBC
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPS
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FZ0
G-S
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
L7B
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OHT
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
UPT
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
X7M
XG1
YF5
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
NPM
AAMNL
AAYXX
ACRPL
ACYXJ
CITATION
7TK
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3831-f2b6cc6908d180c5847ee6b65fb048d12aea59b9f589f302a5b91e90df51e8a93
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0001-690X
IngestDate Wed Dec 04 05:03:57 EST 2024
Thu Oct 10 17:37:38 EDT 2024
Fri Dec 06 05:19:40 EST 2024
Wed Oct 16 00:51:04 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 00:59:29 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords meta-analysis
placebo effect
antidepressants
moderator variables
Language English
License 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3831-f2b6cc6908d180c5847ee6b65fb048d12aea59b9f589f302a5b91e90df51e8a93
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0001-8179-1219
0000-0001-7018-6021
0000-0002-0591-5969
0000-0003-2159-3776
PMID 29603140
PQID 2047348794
PQPubID 33508
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2020491307
proquest_journals_2047348794
crossref_primary_10_1111_acps_12881
pubmed_primary_29603140
wiley_primary_10_1111_acps_12881_ACPS12881
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate June 2018
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2018
  text: June 2018
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Aalborg
PublicationTitle Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica
PublicationTitleAlternate Acta Psychiatr Scand
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References 2010; 34
2015; 14
2010; 16
2009; 62
2010; 36
2000; 47
2016; 209
2010; 303
2015; 72
2013; 203
2002; 7
2006; 59
2002; 2
2003; 191
2012; 37
2002
2012; 15
2011; 14
2009; 118
2013; 8
2018; 21
2010; 63
2012; 73
2016; 7
2011; 366
1979; 134
2016; 3
2006; 67
2017; 37
1960; 23
2013; 159
2017; 32
2002; 287
2011; 72
2015; 43
1994; 11
2011; 65
2016
2009; 6
2013; 173
2013
1998; 52
2012; 69
2013; 170
2012; 21
2014; 222
e_1_2_9_30_1
e_1_2_9_31_1
e_1_2_9_11_1
e_1_2_9_34_1
e_1_2_9_10_1
e_1_2_9_35_1
e_1_2_9_13_1
e_1_2_9_32_1
e_1_2_9_12_1
e_1_2_9_33_1
e_1_2_9_15_1
e_1_2_9_38_1
e_1_2_9_14_1
e_1_2_9_39_1
e_1_2_9_17_1
e_1_2_9_36_1
e_1_2_9_16_1
e_1_2_9_37_1
e_1_2_9_19_1
e_1_2_9_18_1
e_1_2_9_41_1
e_1_2_9_42_1
e_1_2_9_40_1
e_1_2_9_45_1
e_1_2_9_21_1
e_1_2_9_46_1
e_1_2_9_24_1
e_1_2_9_43_1
e_1_2_9_23_1
e_1_2_9_44_1
e_1_2_9_8_1
e_1_2_9_7_1
e_1_2_9_6_1
e_1_2_9_5_1
e_1_2_9_4_1
e_1_2_9_3_1
e_1_2_9_2_1
Kirsch I (e_1_2_9_22_1) 2014; 222
Burnham KP (e_1_2_9_20_1) 2002
e_1_2_9_9_1
e_1_2_9_26_1
e_1_2_9_25_1
e_1_2_9_28_1
e_1_2_9_47_1
e_1_2_9_27_1
e_1_2_9_48_1
e_1_2_9_29_1
References_xml – volume: 23
  start-page: 56
  year: 1960
  end-page: 62
  article-title: A rating scale for depression
  publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
– volume: 47
  start-page: 736
  year: 2000
  end-page: 744
  article-title: Use of placebo control groups in evaluating efficacy of treatment of unipolar major depression
  publication-title: Biol Psychiatry
– volume: 366
  start-page: 1879
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1888
  article-title: Lessons learned from placebo groups in antidepressant trials
  publication-title: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci
– volume: 59
  start-page: 7
  year: 2006
  end-page: 10
  article-title: Imputing missing standard deviations in meta‐analyses can provide accurate results
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
– volume: 14
  start-page: 405
  year: 2011
  end-page: 412
  article-title: Efficacy of antidepressants: a re‐analysis and re‐interpretation of the Kirsch data
  publication-title: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol
– volume: 173
  start-page: 1941
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1951
  article-title: Differential effectiveness of placebo treatments: a systematic review of migraine prophylaxis
  publication-title: JAMA Intern Med
– volume: 2
  start-page: 13
  year: 2002
  article-title: The transitive fallacy for randomized trials: if A bests B and B bests C in separate trials, is A better than C?
  publication-title: BMC Med Res Methodol
– volume: 287
  start-page: 1840
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1847
  article-title: Placebo response in studies of major depression: variable, substantial, and growing
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 15
  start-page: 289
  year: 2012
  end-page: 296
  article-title: Does the frequency of follow‐up assessments affect clinical trial outcome? A meta‐analysis and meta‐regression of placebo‐controlled randomized trials
  publication-title: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol
– volume: 16
  start-page: 217
  year: 2010
  end-page: 226
  article-title: Why has the antidepressant‐placebo difference in antidepressant clinical trials diminished over the past three decades?
  publication-title: CNS Neurosci Ther
– volume: 7
  start-page: 105
  year: 2002
  end-page: 125
  article-title: Combining effect size estimates in meta‐analysis with repeated measures and independent‐groups designs
  publication-title: Psychol Methods
– volume: 32
  start-page: 184
  year: 2017
  end-page: 194
  article-title: Antidepressant effect in older depressed patients: the lessons of two agomelatine trials
  publication-title: Int Clin Psychopharmacol
– volume: 72
  start-page: 500
  year: 2015
  end-page: 510
  article-title: Reporting bias in clinical trials investigating the efficacy of second‐generation antidepressants in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a report of 2 meta‐analyses
  publication-title: JAMA Psychiatry
– volume: 209
  start-page: 427
  year: 2016
  end-page: 428
  article-title: Initial depression severity and response to antidepressants v. placebo: patient‐level data analysis from 34 randomised controlled trials
  publication-title: Br J Psychiatry
– volume: 43
  start-page: 60
  year: 2015
  end-page: 62
  article-title: Empirically derived criteria cast doubt on the clinical significance of antidepressant‐placebo differences
  publication-title: Contemp Clin Trials
– volume: 67
  start-page: 1741
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1746
  article-title: Which factors predict placebo response in anxiety disorders and major depression? An analysis of placebo‐controlled studies of escitalopram
  publication-title: J Clin Psychiatry
– volume: 3
  start-page: 1059
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1066
  article-title: Placebo response rates in antidepressant trials: a systematic review of published and unpublished double‐blind randomised controlled studies
  publication-title: Lancet Psychiatry
– volume: 191
  start-page: 211
  year: 2003
  end-page: 218
  article-title: Placebo response and antidepressant clinical trial outcome
  publication-title: J Nerv Ment Dis
– volume: 73
  start-page: 1300
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1306
  article-title: Correlation between different levels of placebo response rate and clinical trial outcome in major depressive disorder: a meta‐analysis
  publication-title: J Clin Psychiatry
– volume: 11
  start-page: 33
  year: 1994
  end-page: 43
  article-title: Does a placebo run‐in or a placebo treatment cell affect the efficacy of antidepressant medications?
  publication-title: Neuropsychopharmacology
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1
  year: 2018
  end-page: 3
  article-title: Is placebo response in antidepressant trials rising or not? A reanalysis of datasets to conclude this long‐lasting controversy
  publication-title: Evid Based Ment Health
– year: 2016
– volume: 72
  start-page: 464
  year: 2011
  end-page: 472
  article-title: Exploratory analyses of efficacy data from major depressive disorder trials submitted to the US food and drug administration in support of new drug applications
  publication-title: J Clin Psychiatry
– volume: 203
  start-page: 179
  year: 2013
  end-page: 187
  article-title: Agomelatine efficacy and acceptability revisited: systematic review and meta‐analysis of published and unpublished randomised trials
  publication-title: Br J Psychiatry
– volume: 52
  start-page: 377
  year: 1998
  end-page: 384
  article-title: The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non‐randomised studies of health care interventions
  publication-title: J Epidemiol Community Health
– volume: 14
  start-page: 304
  year: 2015
  end-page: 306
  article-title: Factors contributing to the increasing placebo response in antidepressant trials
  publication-title: World Psychiatry
– volume: 37
  start-page: 648
  year: 2017
  end-page: 650
  article-title: Antidepressant trials: are the diminishing effect sizes of efficacy trials avoidable?
  publication-title: J Clin Psychopharmacol
– volume: 69
  start-page: 572
  year: 2012
  end-page: 579
  article-title: Benefits from antidepressants: synthesis of 6‐week patient‐level outcomes from double‐blind placebo‐controlled randomized trials of fluoxetine and venlafaxine
  publication-title: Arch Gen Psychiatry
– volume: 134
  start-page: 382
  year: 1979
  end-page: 389
  article-title: A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
  publication-title: Br J Psychiatry
– volume: 222
  start-page: 128
  year: 2014
  end-page: 134
  article-title: Antidepressants and the Placebo Effect
  publication-title: Z Psychol
– volume: 303
  start-page: 47
  year: 2010
  end-page: 53
  article-title: Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient‐level meta‐analysis
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 62
  start-page: 857
  year: 2009
  end-page: 864
  article-title: A case study of multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis demonstrates that covariates should be considered
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
– year: 2002
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 29
  article-title: glmulti: an r package for easy automated model selection with (generalized) linear models
  publication-title: J Stat Softw
– volume: 37
  start-page: 851
  year: 2012
  end-page: 864
  article-title: Randomized, placebo‐controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty‐year meta‐analytic review
  publication-title: Neuropsychopharmacology
– volume: 8
  start-page: e66844
  year: 2013
  article-title: Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias ‐ an updated review
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
– volume: 118
  start-page: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Meta‐analysis of the placebo response in antidepressant trials
  publication-title: J Affect Disord
– volume: 63
  start-page: 587
  year: 2010
  end-page: 588
  article-title: Study designs to detect sponsorship and other biases in systematic reviews
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
– volume: 65
  start-page: 23
  year: 2011
  end-page: 35
  article-title: AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons
  publication-title: Behav Ecol Sociobiol
– volume: 159
  start-page: 130
  year: 2013
  end-page: 137
  article-title: Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 6
  start-page: e1000097
  year: 2009
  article-title: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement
  publication-title: PLoS Med
– volume: 37
  start-page: 2830
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2836
  article-title: A meta‐analysis of factors impacting detection of antidepressant efficacy in clinical trials: the importance of academic sites
  publication-title: Neuropsychopharmacology
– volume: 21
  start-page: 151
  year: 2012
  end-page: 153
  article-title: What is a multiple treatments meta‐analysis?
  publication-title: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci
– volume: 170
  start-page: 723
  year: 2013
  end-page: 733
  article-title: A model of placebo response in antidepressant clinical trials
  publication-title: Am J Psychiatry
– volume: 7
  start-page: 236
  year: 2016
  end-page: 263
  article-title: GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology
  publication-title: Res Synth Methods
– year: 2013
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Conducting meta‐analyses in R with the metafor package
  publication-title: J Stat Soft
– ident: e_1_2_9_9_1
  doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30307-8
– ident: e_1_2_9_43_1
  doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12040474
– ident: e_1_2_9_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.005
– ident: e_1_2_9_33_1
  doi: 10.1002/wps.20245
– ident: e_1_2_9_34_1
  doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.173906
– ident: e_1_2_9_46_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10391
– ident: e_1_2_9_29_1
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v034.i12
– ident: e_1_2_9_32_1
  doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0394
– ident: e_1_2_9_48_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_37_1
  doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000174
– ident: e_1_2_9_47_1
  doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102827
– ident: e_1_2_9_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.06.006
– ident: e_1_2_9_2_1
  doi: 10.1017/S2045796011000837
– ident: e_1_2_9_42_1
  doi: 10.4088/JCP.11r07485
– ident: e_1_2_9_44_1
  doi: 10.1038/npp.1994.63
– ident: e_1_2_9_28_1
  doi: 10.4088/JCP.v67n1111
– ident: e_1_2_9_31_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1461145710000957
– ident: e_1_2_9_35_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1943
– ident: e_1_2_9_40_1
  doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.15
– ident: e_1_2_9_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.001
– ident: e_1_2_9_30_1
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v036.i03
– ident: e_1_2_9_16_1
  doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382
– ident: e_1_2_9_11_1
  doi: 10.4088/JCP.10m06191
– ident: e_1_2_9_41_1
  doi: 10.1097/01.NMD.0000061144.16176.38
– ident: e_1_2_9_38_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.05.005
– ident: e_1_2_9_45_1
  doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000796
– ident: e_1_2_9_13_1
– ident: e_1_2_9_23_1
  doi: 10.1001/jama.287.14.1840
– ident: e_1_2_9_4_1
  doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1195
– ident: e_1_2_9_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.01.029
– volume-title: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information‐Theoretic Approach
  year: 2002
  ident: e_1_2_9_20_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Burnham KP
– ident: e_1_2_9_24_1
  doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.120196
– ident: e_1_2_9_12_1
  doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.306
– ident: e_1_2_9_7_1
  doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.153
– ident: e_1_2_9_27_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1461145711000666
– ident: e_1_2_9_15_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x
– ident: e_1_2_9_18_1
  doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.105
– ident: e_1_2_9_14_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
– ident: e_1_2_9_5_1
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-2-13
– ident: e_1_2_9_17_1
  doi: 10.1136/jech.52.6.377
– ident: e_1_2_9_39_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844
– ident: e_1_2_9_36_1
  doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.2044
– ident: e_1_2_9_3_1
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-2-201307160-00008
– volume: 222
  start-page: 128
  year: 2014
  ident: e_1_2_9_22_1
  article-title: Antidepressants and the Placebo Effect
  publication-title: Z Psychol
  contributor:
    fullname: Kirsch I
– ident: e_1_2_9_26_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0006-3223(00)00846-5
– ident: e_1_2_9_21_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00265-010-1029-6
– ident: e_1_2_9_10_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2010.00151.x
SSID ssj0005108
Score 2.3613338
Snippet Objective Our analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely...
Our analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely duloxetine...
ObjectiveOur analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely...
OBJECTIVEOur analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 472
SubjectTerms Antidepressants
Duloxetine
Mental depression
Meta-analysis
moderator variables
Placebo effect
Placebos
Venlafaxine
Title Differences in the placebo response in duloxetine and venlafaxine trials
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Facps.12881
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29603140
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2047348794
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2020491307
Volume 137
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ZS8NAEB5EQXzxPuJFRJ-ElGS7m2bBl2otRVDEA_oiYTbZBbGkYlsQf72zm6ReIOhbjg2b7OzMfJO5AI4U44Y0KwYcIxVYjRWQEtYBE4ixaUmRc5uNfHkV9-75RV_0Z-CkzoUp60NMf7hZznDy2jI4qtEnJsfsedQg6eryrqNmy8bzdW4-akfRZivFMNnLZAL2q9qkNozn49Gv2ugHxPyKWJ3K6S7BQ_2yZaTJU2MyVo3s7Vsdx_9-zTIsVljUb5ebZwVmdLEK85eVt30Nep2qewrJEv-x8Akr-i6GSw39lzK2Vtvr-WQwfLWp09rHIvdJfA7Q4Ks9d01BRutw3z2_O-sFVeeFICOLNQoMU3GW0aoleZSEmXWlah2rWBhFHJ9HDDUKqaQRiTTNkKFQMtIyzI2IdIKyuQGzxbDQW-Aja7GYGRUbhjxPmCJIr3nOmwkawULlwWFNgfS5LLCR1oaJXZTULYoHuzVx0orJRikLua3NQxLFg4PpbWIP6_PAQg8ndgyNkqSoWx5slkSdTsOkbbHNQw-OHWl-mT9tn13fuqPtvwzegQUCWEkZWrYLs-OXid4jEDNW-zDXPu2cdvfdpn0HV4btaQ
link.rule.ids 314,780,784,1375,27924,27925,46294,46718
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1ZS8NAEB5EQX3xPuIZ0SchJdnuptnH4kE9KuIBfQu7yS6IJRXbQvHXO7NJ6wWCvuXYsGRnZ-abnQvgSDNuUbOqgKtIB6SxAlTCJmBCqdg2pMg5ZSO3b-LWI7_siE4Vm0O5MGV9iMmBG3GGk9fE4HQg_YnLVfbSr6F4pcTrGeT3iCK6Tu8-qkfhdisFMVrMaAR2quqkFMjz8e1XffQDZH7FrE7pnC-WnVX7rlYhxZo814YDXcvevlVy_Pf_LMFCBUf9Zrl_lmHKFCsw264c7qvQOq0aqKA48Z8KH-Gi78K4dM9_LcNrDT3Ph93eiLKnja-K3EcJ2lVWjeje9QXpr8Hj-dnDSSuomi8EGRqtUWCZjrMMly3JoyTMyJtqTKxjYTUyfR4xZZSQWlqRSFsPmRJaRkaGuRWRSZSsr8N00SvMJviKNVjMrI4tUzxPmEZUb3jO64mygoXag8MxCdKXssZGOrZNaFFStyge7Iypk1Z81k9ZyKk8DwoVDw4mr5FDyO2hCtMb0hgcJVFXNzzYKKk6mYZJ6rLNQw-OHW1-mT9tntzeu6utvwzeh7nWQ_s6vb64udqGecRbSRlptgPTg9eh2UVMM9B7bue-A8Jx8Bg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3rS8MwED9EYfjF96M6taKfhI42S7oG_CLOMZ8MdbAvUpImAVG64TYY_vVe-phOQdBvfaSkzeXuftd7ARxLQg1qVuFREUjPaiwPlbD2CBMiNA3OFLXZyLd3YbtLr3qsNwenZS5MXh9i-sPNckYmry2DD5T5wuQiGQxrKF1t3vUCDQm3lfOb95_Fo3C35XIYDWa0AXtFcVIbx_P57Kw6-oExZyFrpnNay_BUvm0eavJSG49kLXn_Vsjxv5-zAksFGHXP8t2zCnM6XYPKbeFuX4d2s2ifgsLEfU5dBItuFsQl--5bHlyr7XU1fu1PbO60dkWqXJSfr8KIiT3PuoIMN6Dbung8b3tF6wUvQZM18AyRYZLgqkUqiPzE-lK1DmXIjESWVwERWjAuuWERN3WfCCZ5oLmvDAt0JHh9E-bTfqq3wRWkQUJiZGiIoCoiEjG9porWI2EY8aUDRyUF4kFeYSMuLRO7KHG2KA5US-LEBZcNY-JTW5wHRYoDh9PbyB_W6SFS3R_bMTiKo6ZuOLCVE3U6DeG2xzb1HTjJSPPL_PHZeechO9r5y-ADqHSarfjm8u56FxYRbEV5mFkV5kdvY72HgGYk97N9-wEC6e7H
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences+in+the+placebo+response+in+duloxetine+and+venlafaxine+trials&rft.jtitle=Acta+psychiatrica+Scandinavica&rft.au=Breilmann%2C+J.&rft.au=Furukawa%2C+T.+A.&rft.au=Becker%2C+T.&rft.au=Koesters%2C+M.&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.issn=0001-690X&rft.eissn=1600-0447&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=472&rft.epage=480&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Facps.12881&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Facps.12881&rft.externalDocID=ACPS12881
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0001-690X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0001-690X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0001-690X&client=summon