Differences in the placebo response in duloxetine and venlafaxine trials
Objective Our analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely duloxetine and venlafaxine, and at analysing a potential influence of the investigated drugs on the placebo response. Method We conducted a com...
Saved in:
Published in | Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica Vol. 137; no. 6; pp. 472 - 480 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.06.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Objective
Our analysis aimed at comparing the placebo effect sizes from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of two widely prescribed antidepressants, namely duloxetine and venlafaxine, and at analysing a potential influence of the investigated drugs on the placebo response.
Method
We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis of placebo‐controlled, double‐blind RCTs, which examined the efficacy of duloxetine and venlafaxine in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.
Results
We included 71 studies (29 duloxetine trials and 43 venlafaxine trials; one study provided data for the duloxetine and the venlafaxine data set). The placebo effect sizes, defined as pre‐postscore change divided by baseline standard deviation, differed significantly between venlafaxine and duloxetine studies (−2.51 vs. −2.09; test for subgroup differences P = 0.028; high heterogeneity). The analysis of effect modifiers and the metaregression analyses confirmed the drug, next to baseline depression severity and publication status, as the most influential independent predictor.
Conclusion
Our analyses show a significant difference in the placebo response between venlafaxine and duloxetine trials and suggest that the investigated drug has an influence on the placebo response that is not related to baseline severity, changes over the years or other variables we included. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
ISSN: | 0001-690X 1600-0447 |
DOI: | 10.1111/acps.12881 |