Comparison of synthetic LGE with optimal inversion time vs. conventional LGE via representation learning: Quantification of Bias in Population Analysis
Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) images are crucial elements of CMR protocols for evaluating myocardial infarct (MI) severity and size. However, these images rely on signal intensity changes and manual inversion time (TI) settings, leading to suboptimal lesion/remote contrast in many cases. Here, w...
Saved in:
Published in | Computers in biology and medicine Vol. 196; no. Pt B; p. 110643 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Ltd
01.09.2025
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) images are crucial elements of CMR protocols for evaluating myocardial infarct (MI) severity and size. However, these images rely on signal intensity changes and manual inversion time (TI) settings, leading to suboptimal lesion/remote contrast in many cases. Here, we propose an original approach to evaluate the impact of suboptimal TI on the retrospective analysis of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) patients, using a representation learning methodology tailored to consider infarct- and image-based characteristics across the studied population.
We analyzed 133 pairs of conventional and synthetic LGE short-axis images from the HIBISCUS-STEMI cohort (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT03070496). Optimal TI was identified among co-registered synthetic LGE images, using a mixture of the Mann–Whitney U-test, standard deviation, and saturation of pixel values, while the TI used for conventional LGE image generation was extracted from the DICOM header. Images were realigned to a reference for pixel-wise inter-subject comparisons. Population analysis relied on Attribute-based Regularized Variational Autoencoders which provide a latent representation of the population that is both easier to analyze (lower dimensionality) and ordered by infarct-relevant attributes.
Despite visual quality control in the clinic, our study demonstrates that nearly 50% of conventional LGE slices may include a suboptimal TI setting, mostly related to TI settings shorter than the optimal TI determined from synthetic LGE. Additionally, our findings showed that when isolating contrast effects and suboptimal TI settings, contrast had a minimal impact on infarct lesion metrics such as infarct size or transmurality in the latent space. This suggests that other factors than contrast setting are leading (for both cases) to systematic and proportional bias (p<0.05) and loss of precision (respectively ρ=0.42 and ρ=0.43) in the latent space.
Suboptimal TI undermines the analysis of infarct patterns in populations. Representation learning is a powerful method to retro-analyze cohorts, enabling the identification of imperfect settings, a crucial step for accurately characterizing representative patterns of a population. Our strategy can be considered a promising candidate for monitoring longitudinal changes and evaluating therapy outcomes on broader populations.
[Display omitted]
•Manual TI settings may lead to suboptimal contrast in conventional LGE images.•Synthetic LGE from MOLLI sequence allows optimal TI hence optimal contrast in the images.•Representation learning enables the comparison between conventional and synthetic LGE.•This approach permitted the quantitative evaluation of the bias in the analysis of myocardial infarcts. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) images are crucial elements of CMR protocols for evaluating myocardial infarct (MI) severity and size. However, these images rely on signal intensity changes and manual inversion time (TI) settings, leading to suboptimal lesion/remote contrast in many cases. Here, we propose an original approach to evaluate the impact of suboptimal TI on the retrospective analysis of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) patients, using a representation learning methodology tailored to consider infarct- and image-based characteristics across the studied population.
We analyzed 133 pairs of conventional and synthetic LGE short-axis images from the HIBISCUS-STEMI cohort (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT03070496). Optimal TI was identified among co-registered synthetic LGE images, using a mixture of the Mann-Whitney U-test, standard deviation, and saturation of pixel values, while the TI used for conventional LGE image generation was extracted from the DICOM header. Images were realigned to a reference for pixel-wise inter-subject comparisons. Population analysis relied on Attribute-based Regularized Variational Autoencoders which provide a latent representation of the population that is both easier to analyze (lower dimensionality) and ordered by infarct-relevant attributes.
Despite visual quality control in the clinic, our study demonstrates that nearly 50% of conventional LGE slices may include a suboptimal TI setting, mostly related to TI settings shorter than the optimal TI determined from synthetic LGE. Additionally, our findings showed that when isolating contrast effects and suboptimal TI settings, contrast had a minimal impact on infarct lesion metrics such as infarct size or transmurality in the latent space. This suggests that other factors than contrast setting are leading (for both cases) to systematic and proportional bias (p<0.05) and loss of precision (respectively ρ=0.42 and ρ=0.43) in the latent space.
Suboptimal TI undermines the analysis of infarct patterns in populations. Representation learning is a powerful method to retro-analyze cohorts, enabling the identification of imperfect settings, a crucial step for accurately characterizing representative patterns of a population. Our strategy can be considered a promising candidate for monitoring longitudinal changes and evaluating therapy outcomes on broader populations. Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) images are crucial elements of CMR protocols for evaluating myocardial infarct (MI) severity and size. However, these images rely on signal intensity changes and manual inversion time (TI) settings, leading to suboptimal lesion/remote contrast in many cases. Here, we propose an original approach to evaluate the impact of suboptimal TI on the retrospective analysis of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) patients, using a representation learning methodology tailored to consider infarct- and image-based characteristics across the studied population. We analyzed 133 pairs of conventional and synthetic LGE short-axis images from the HIBISCUS-STEMI cohort (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT03070496). Optimal TI was identified among co-registered synthetic LGE images, using a mixture of the Mann–Whitney U-test, standard deviation, and saturation of pixel values, while the TI used for conventional LGE image generation was extracted from the DICOM header. Images were realigned to a reference for pixel-wise inter-subject comparisons. Population analysis relied on Attribute-based Regularized Variational Autoencoders which provide a latent representation of the population that is both easier to analyze (lower dimensionality) and ordered by infarct-relevant attributes. Despite visual quality control in the clinic, our study demonstrates that nearly 50% of conventional LGE slices may include a suboptimal TI setting, mostly related to TI settings shorter than the optimal TI determined from synthetic LGE. Additionally, our findings showed that when isolating contrast effects and suboptimal TI settings, contrast had a minimal impact on infarct lesion metrics such as infarct size or transmurality in the latent space. This suggests that other factors than contrast setting are leading (for both cases) to systematic and proportional bias (p<0.05) and loss of precision (respectively ρ=0.42 and ρ=0.43) in the latent space. Suboptimal TI undermines the analysis of infarct patterns in populations. Representation learning is a powerful method to retro-analyze cohorts, enabling the identification of imperfect settings, a crucial step for accurately characterizing representative patterns of a population. Our strategy can be considered a promising candidate for monitoring longitudinal changes and evaluating therapy outcomes on broader populations. [Display omitted] •Manual TI settings may lead to suboptimal contrast in conventional LGE images.•Synthetic LGE from MOLLI sequence allows optimal TI hence optimal contrast in the images.•Representation learning enables the comparison between conventional and synthetic LGE.•This approach permitted the quantitative evaluation of the bias in the analysis of myocardial infarcts. Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) images are crucial elements of CMR protocols for evaluating myocardial infarct (MI) severity and size. However, these images rely on signal intensity changes and manual inversion time (TI) settings, leading to suboptimal lesion/remote contrast in many cases. Here, we propose an original approach to evaluate the impact of suboptimal TI on the retrospective analysis of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) patients, using a representation learning methodology tailored to consider infarct- and image-based characteristics across the studied population.PURPOSELate Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) images are crucial elements of CMR protocols for evaluating myocardial infarct (MI) severity and size. However, these images rely on signal intensity changes and manual inversion time (TI) settings, leading to suboptimal lesion/remote contrast in many cases. Here, we propose an original approach to evaluate the impact of suboptimal TI on the retrospective analysis of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) patients, using a representation learning methodology tailored to consider infarct- and image-based characteristics across the studied population.We analyzed 133 pairs of conventional and synthetic LGE short-axis images from the HIBISCUS-STEMI cohort (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT03070496). Optimal TI was identified among co-registered synthetic LGE images, using a mixture of the Mann-Whitney U-test, standard deviation, and saturation of pixel values, while the TI used for conventional LGE image generation was extracted from the DICOM header. Images were realigned to a reference for pixel-wise inter-subject comparisons. Population analysis relied on Attribute-based Regularized Variational Autoencoders which provide a latent representation of the population that is both easier to analyze (lower dimensionality) and ordered by infarct-relevant attributes.METHODSWe analyzed 133 pairs of conventional and synthetic LGE short-axis images from the HIBISCUS-STEMI cohort (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT03070496). Optimal TI was identified among co-registered synthetic LGE images, using a mixture of the Mann-Whitney U-test, standard deviation, and saturation of pixel values, while the TI used for conventional LGE image generation was extracted from the DICOM header. Images were realigned to a reference for pixel-wise inter-subject comparisons. Population analysis relied on Attribute-based Regularized Variational Autoencoders which provide a latent representation of the population that is both easier to analyze (lower dimensionality) and ordered by infarct-relevant attributes.Despite visual quality control in the clinic, our study demonstrates that nearly 50% of conventional LGE slices may include a suboptimal TI setting, mostly related to TI settings shorter than the optimal TI determined from synthetic LGE. Additionally, our findings showed that when isolating contrast effects and suboptimal TI settings, contrast had a minimal impact on infarct lesion metrics such as infarct size or transmurality in the latent space. This suggests that other factors than contrast setting are leading (for both cases) to systematic and proportional bias (p<0.05) and loss of precision (respectively ρ=0.42 and ρ=0.43) in the latent space.RESULTSDespite visual quality control in the clinic, our study demonstrates that nearly 50% of conventional LGE slices may include a suboptimal TI setting, mostly related to TI settings shorter than the optimal TI determined from synthetic LGE. Additionally, our findings showed that when isolating contrast effects and suboptimal TI settings, contrast had a minimal impact on infarct lesion metrics such as infarct size or transmurality in the latent space. This suggests that other factors than contrast setting are leading (for both cases) to systematic and proportional bias (p<0.05) and loss of precision (respectively ρ=0.42 and ρ=0.43) in the latent space.Suboptimal TI undermines the analysis of infarct patterns in populations. Representation learning is a powerful method to retro-analyze cohorts, enabling the identification of imperfect settings, a crucial step for accurately characterizing representative patterns of a population. Our strategy can be considered a promising candidate for monitoring longitudinal changes and evaluating therapy outcomes on broader populations.CONCLUSIONSuboptimal TI undermines the analysis of infarct patterns in populations. Representation learning is a powerful method to retro-analyze cohorts, enabling the identification of imperfect settings, a crucial step for accurately characterizing representative patterns of a population. Our strategy can be considered a promising candidate for monitoring longitudinal changes and evaluating therapy outcomes on broader populations. AbstractPurpose:Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) images are crucial elements of CMR protocols for evaluating myocardial infarct (MI) severity and size. However, these images rely on signal intensity changes and manual inversion time (TI) settings, leading to suboptimal lesion/remote contrast in many cases. Here, we propose an original approach to evaluate the impact of suboptimal TI on the retrospective analysis of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) patients, using a representation learning methodology tailored to consider infarct- and image-based characteristics across the studied population. Methods:We analyzed 133 pairs of conventional and synthetic LGE short-axis images from the HIBISCUS-STEMI cohort (ClinicalTrials ID: NCT03070496). Optimal TI was identified among co-registered synthetic LGE images, using a mixture of the Mann–Whitney U-test, standard deviation, and saturation of pixel values, while the TI used for conventional LGE image generation was extracted from the DICOM header. Images were realigned to a reference for pixel-wise inter-subject comparisons. Population analysis relied on Attribute-based Regularized Variational Autoencoders which provide a latent representation of the population that is both easier to analyze (lower dimensionality) and ordered by infarct-relevant attributes. Results:Despite visual quality control in the clinic, our study demonstrates that nearly 50% of conventional LGE slices may include a suboptimal TI setting, mostly related to TI settings shorter than the optimal TI determined from synthetic LGE. Additionally, our findings showed that when isolating contrast effects and suboptimal TI settings, contrast had a minimal impact on infarct lesion metrics such as infarct size or transmurality in the latent space. This suggests that other factors than contrast setting are leading (for both cases) to systematic and proportional bias ( p<0.05) and loss of precision (respectively ρ=0.42 and ρ=0.43) in the latent space. Conclusion:Suboptimal TI undermines the analysis of infarct patterns in populations. Representation learning is a powerful method to retro-analyze cohorts, enabling the identification of imperfect settings, a crucial step for accurately characterizing representative patterns of a population. Our strategy can be considered a promising candidate for monitoring longitudinal changes and evaluating therapy outcomes on broader populations. |
ArticleNumber | 110643 |
Author | Petrusca, Lorena Viallon, Magalie Croisille, Pierre Duchateau, Nicolas Deleat-besson, Romain |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Romain orcidid: 0009-0009-4188-8169 surname: Deleat-besson fullname: Deleat-besson, Romain email: romain.deleat@creatis.insa-lyon.fr organization: Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSA-Lyon, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294, F-69621, Lyon, France – sequence: 2 givenname: Magalie orcidid: 0000-0001-9118-0438 surname: Viallon fullname: Viallon, Magalie organization: Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSA-Lyon, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294, F-69621, Lyon, France – sequence: 3 givenname: Lorena orcidid: 0000-0002-7108-7102 surname: Petrusca fullname: Petrusca, Lorena organization: Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSA-Lyon, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294, F-69621, Lyon, France – sequence: 4 givenname: Pierre surname: Croisille fullname: Croisille, Pierre organization: Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSA-Lyon, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294, F-69621, Lyon, France – sequence: 5 givenname: Nicolas orcidid: 0000-0001-8803-2004 surname: Duchateau fullname: Duchateau, Nicolas organization: Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSA-Lyon, CNRS, Inserm, CREATIS UMR 5220, U1294, F-69621, Lyon, France |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40675093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://hal.science/hal-05225924$$DView record in HAL |
BookMark | eNqNkt1u1DAQhS1URLeFV0C-hItdxs7fhgvEdlVapJUAAdeW40xYL1k72EnQPgmvy0QpRUJC6k0cn_nmJJ7jC3bmvEPGuICVAJG_OqyMP3aV9UesVxJkthIC8jR5xBZiXZRLyJL0jC0ABCzTtczO2UWMBwBIIYEn7DyFvMigTBbs15aMdLDRO-4bHk-u32NvDd_dXPOftt9z3_X2qFtu3YghWuJoj3yMK248aa4njepTw2g1D9gFjCTrqcBb1MFZ9-01_zRoYhtr5gJ97crqSL78o--GdlY3ZHWKNj5ljxvdRnx2t16yr--uv2xvl7sPN--3m93SJGvZL5taSEhFUqVV2RSAuZSFzNayQSGqsqjpLZNlXslGYlLpXKZlg1qQpouGHsklezn77nWrukAnDSfltVW3m52aNMikzEqZjoLYFzPbBf9jwNiro40G21Y79ENUiUyEzHPISkKf36FDRRndO_8ZPAHrGTDBxxiwuUcEqCljdVB_M1ZTxmrOmFqv5lakuYwWg4rGojNY24CmV7W3DzF584-Jaa2jbNrveMJ48EOgJKISKkoF6vN0laabJDOAskynYbz9v8HD_uE3I4Tf1Q |
Cites_doi | 10.2214/AJR.08.1952 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036806 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.059 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.036 10.1007/s00330-024-10630-w 10.1002/jmri.22783 10.1148/radiol.2015150162 10.1007/s10334-023-01101-2 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110242 10.1007/s00521-020-05270-2 10.1016/j.mri.2024.03.035 10.1016/j.media.2022.102516 10.1002/mrm.20110 10.1186/s12968-023-00925-0 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1194 10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-O8 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030693 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.104 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90407-R |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2025 Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025 – notice: Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Ltd. – notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 1XC |
DOI | 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Computer Science |
EISSN | 1879-0534 |
EndPage | 110643 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_HAL_hal_05225924v1 40675093 10_1016_j_compbiomed_2025_110643 S0010482525009941 1_s2_0_S0010482525009941 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M --Z -~X .1- .55 .DC .FO .GJ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~. 1~5 29F 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8P~ 9JN AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AATTM AAXKI AAXUO AAYFN AAYWO ABBOA ABFNM ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABUWG ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACIEU ACIUM ACIWK ACNNM ACPRK ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ACZNC ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADJOM ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFKRA AFPUW AFRAH AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHHHB AHMBA AHZHX AIALX AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX AOUOD APXCP ARAPS ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CS3 DU5 DWQXO EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EMOBN EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN FYUFA G-2 G-Q GBLVA GBOLZ GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ HLZ HMCUK HMK HMO HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W K6V K7- KOM LK8 LX9 M1P M29 M2O M41 M7P MO0 N9A NAPCQ O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P P62 PC. PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO Q38 R2- ROL RPZ RXW SAE SBC SCC SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SPC SPCBC SSH SSV SSZ SV3 T5K TAE UAP UKHRP WOW WUQ X7M XPP Z5R ZGI ~G- AFCTW AGRNS ALIPV RIG AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 1XC |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-fd120413b4b9f70e62272582fe11b97d82f5296b2f2e3ba6249fea1529a7f29a3 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0010-4825 1879-0534 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 29 06:29:38 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 18 18:40:10 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 28 04:44:28 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 14 00:12:15 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 30 17:17:08 EDT 2025 Fri Aug 08 06:00:41 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 26 16:44:44 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | Pt B |
Keywords | Dimensionality reduction Myocardial infarction Representation learning Late gadolinium enhancement Cardiac magnetic resonance |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c382t-fd120413b4b9f70e62272582fe11b97d82f5296b2f2e3ba6249fea1529a7f29a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0009-0009-4188-8169 0000-0001-8803-2004 0000-0002-7108-7102 0000-0001-9118-0438 0000-0003-4019-3460 |
PMID | 40675093 |
PQID | 3231266059 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_05225924v1 proquest_miscellaneous_3231266059 pubmed_primary_40675093 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2025_110643 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2025_110643 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0010482525009941 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2025_110643 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2025 text: 2025-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Computers in biology and medicine |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Comput Biol Med |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Elsevier |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier |
References | Pati, Alexander (b20) 2021; 33 Passing, Bablok (b25) 1983 Aguila, Chapman, Altmann (b38) 2023; 14220 Wince, Suranyi, Schoepf (b5) 2013; 3 Lawrence, Lin (b27) 1989 Bulluck, Dharmakumar, Arai (b1) 2018; 137 R.W.A., Viallon, Spaltenstein (b21) 2022; 17 Elster (b22) 2023 Antelmi, Ayache, Robert (b37) 2019; 97 de Villedon de Naide, Maes, Villegas-Martinez (b33) 2024; 109 Martí-Juan, Lorenzi, G. (b39) 2024; 268 Eitel, De Waha, Wöhrle (b3) 2014; 64 Maillot, Sridi, Pineau (b32) 2023; 36 Bengio, Courville, Vincent (b14) 2013; 35 Corral Acero, Schuster, Zacur (b15) 2022; 15 Liu, Sanchez, Thermos (b19) 2022; 80 Kolentinis, Carerj, Vidalakis (b30) 2022; 150 Androulakis, Zeppenfeld, Paiman (b8) 2019; 5 Kingma, Welling (b18) 2014 Viallon, Jacquier, Rotaru (b41) 2011; 34 Varga-Szemes, Van der Geest, Spottiswoode (b12) 2015; 17 Bland, Altman (b26) 1986 Xie, Zhang, Mensink (b31) 2024 Wang, Yao, Zhao (b17) 2016; 184 Taylor, Salerno, Dharmakumar (b10) 2016; 9 Deichmann, Haase (b24) 1992; 96 Yoshida, Gould (b4) 1993; 22 Kino, Zuehlsdorff, Sheehan (b7) 2009; 193 Kim, Farzaneh-Far, Kim (b2) 2009; 55 Viallon, Troalen, Spottiswoode (b13) 2016 Duchateau, Viallon, Petrusca (b16) 2023; 10 Hu, Sapkota, Thomasson (b36) 2021; 13 Bochaton, Leboube, Paccalet (b29) 2022; 53 Dodge, Karam (b35) 2016 Muthalaly, Kwong, John (b9) 2019; 12 Balaban, Halliday, Porter (b40) 2021; 7 McBride (b28) 2005; 45 Varga-Szemes, Van der Geest, Spottiswoode (b11) 2016; 278 Messroghli, Radjenovic, Kozerke (b23) 2004; 52 Antiochos, Ge, Van Der Geest (b34) 2022; 15 Jenista, Wendell, Azevedo (b6) 2023; 25 Antelmi (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b37) 2019; 97 Antiochos (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b34) 2022; 15 Kino (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b7) 2009; 193 Passing (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b25) 1983 Kim (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b2) 2009; 55 Bengio (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b14) 2013; 35 McBride (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b28) 2005; 45 Pati (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b20) 2021; 33 Bochaton (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b29) 2022; 53 Viallon (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b41) 2011; 34 Wince (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b5) 2013; 3 Yoshida (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b4) 1993; 22 Deichmann (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b24) 1992; 96 Varga-Szemes (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b11) 2016; 278 Maillot (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b32) 2023; 36 Muthalaly (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b9) 2019; 12 R.W.A. (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b21) 2022; 17 Bland (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b26) 1986 Eitel (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b3) 2014; 64 Corral Acero (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b15) 2022; 15 Liu (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b19) 2022; 80 Lawrence (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b27) 1989 Bulluck (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b1) 2018; 137 Elster (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b22) 2023 de Villedon de Naide (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b33) 2024; 109 Viallon (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b13) 2016 Hu (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b36) 2021; 13 Taylor (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b10) 2016; 9 Varga-Szemes (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b12) 2015; 17 Aguila (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b38) 2023; 14220 Androulakis (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b8) 2019; 5 Duchateau (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b16) 2023; 10 Kolentinis (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b30) 2022; 150 Dodge (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b35) 2016 Jenista (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b6) 2023; 25 Wang (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b17) 2016; 184 Martí-Juan (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b39) 2024; 268 Kingma (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b18) 2014 Messroghli (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b23) 2004; 52 Balaban (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b40) 2021; 7 Xie (10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b31) 2024 |
References_xml | – volume: 15 start-page: 783 year: 2022 end-page: 792 ident: b34 article-title: Entropy as a measure of myocardial tissue heterogeneity in patients with ventricular arrhythmias publication-title: JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging – start-page: 1 year: 2016 end-page: 6 ident: b35 article-title: Understanding how image quality affects deep neural networks publication-title: Proc. IEEE QoMEX – volume: 55 start-page: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 16 ident: b2 article-title: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial infarction: current and emerging applications publication-title: J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. – volume: 97 start-page: 302 year: 2019 end-page: 311 ident: b37 article-title: Sparse multi-channel variational autoencoder for the joint analysis of heterogeneous data publication-title: Proc. ICML – volume: 278 start-page: 374 year: 2016 end-page: 382 ident: b11 article-title: Myocardial late gadolinium enhancement: Accuracy of T1 mapping–based synthetic inversion-recovery imaging publication-title: Radiol. – volume: 184 start-page: 232 year: 2016 end-page: 242 ident: b17 article-title: Auto-encoder based dimensionality reduction publication-title: Neurocomputing – volume: 12 start-page: 1177 year: 2019 end-page: 1184 ident: b9 article-title: Left ventricular entropy is a novel predictor of arrhythmic events in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy receiving defibrillators for primary prevention publication-title: JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging – year: 2014 ident: b18 article-title: Auto-encoding variational Bayes publication-title: Proc. ICLR – volume: 96 start-page: 608 year: 1992 end-page: 612 ident: b24 article-title: Quantification of T1 values by SNAPSHOT-FLASH NMR imaging publication-title: J Magn Reson. – volume: 109 start-page: 256 year: 2024 end-page: 263 ident: b33 article-title: Fully automated contrast selection of joint bright- and black-blood late gadolinium enhancement imaging for robust myocardial scar assessment publication-title: Magn. Reson. Imaging – volume: 35 start-page: 1798 year: 2013 end-page: 1828 ident: b14 article-title: Representation learning: a review and new perspectives publication-title: IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. – volume: 80 year: 2022 ident: b19 article-title: Learning disentangled representations in the imaging domain publication-title: Med Image Anal – volume: 53 start-page: 2249 year: 2022 end-page: 2259 ident: b29 article-title: Impact of age on systemic inflammatory profile of patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction and acute ischemic stroke publication-title: Stroke – volume: 3 year: 2013 ident: b5 article-title: Contemporary cardiovascular imaging methods for the assessment of at-risk myocardium publication-title: J Am Hear. Assoc – volume: 45 year: 2005 ident: b28 article-title: A proposal for strength-of-agreement criteria for Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient publication-title: NIWA Client Rep.: HAM2005– 062 – start-page: 255 year: 1989 end-page: 268 ident: b27 article-title: A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility publication-title: Biometrics – year: 2016 ident: b13 article-title: MOLLI T1 mapping sequence: the best approach for delayed enhancement (DE) CMR? – volume: 17 year: 2022 ident: b21 article-title: CMRSegTools: An open-source software enabling reproducible research in segmentation of acute myocardial infarct in CMR images publication-title: PLoS One – volume: 193 start-page: 381 year: 2009 end-page: 388 ident: b7 article-title: Three-dimensional phase-sensitive inversion-recovery turbo FLASH sequence for the evaluation of left ventricular myocardial scar publication-title: AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. – volume: 13 start-page: 21 year: 2021 end-page: 40 ident: b36 article-title: Influence of image quality and light consistency on the performance of convolutional neural networks for weed mapping publication-title: Remote. Sens. – start-page: 307 year: 1986 end-page: 310 ident: b26 article-title: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement publication-title: Lancet – volume: 150 year: 2022 ident: b30 article-title: Determination of scar area using native and post-contrast T1 mapping: Agreement with late gadolinium enhancement publication-title: Eur. J. Radiol. – volume: 22 start-page: 984 year: 1993 end-page: 997 ident: b4 article-title: Quantitative relation of myocardial infarct size and myocardial viability by positron emission tomography to left ventricular ejection fraction and 3-year mortality with and without revascularization publication-title: J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. – volume: 34 start-page: 1374 year: 2011 end-page: 1387 ident: b41 article-title: Head-to-head comparison of eight late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MR (LGE CMR) sequences at 1.5 tesla: From bench to bedside publication-title: J. Magn. Reson. Imaging – volume: 17 start-page: 1 year: 2015 end-page: 2 ident: b12 article-title: Quantification of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement using synthetic inversion recovery imaging publication-title: J Cardiovasc. Magn Reson. – volume: 15 start-page: 1563 year: 2022 end-page: 1574 ident: b15 article-title: Understanding and improving risk assessment after myocardial infarction using automated left ventricular shape analysis publication-title: JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging – volume: 268 year: 2024 ident: b39 article-title: MC-RVAE: Multi-channel recurrent variational autoencoder for multimodal Alzheimer’s disease progression modelling publication-title: Neuroimage – volume: 25 start-page: 18 year: 2023 ident: b6 article-title: Revisiting how we perform late gadolinium enhancement CMR: insights gleaned over 25 years of clinical practice publication-title: J Cardiovasc. Magn Reson. – volume: 33 start-page: 4429 year: 2021 end-page: 4444 ident: b20 article-title: Attribute-based regularization of latent spaces for variational auto-encoders publication-title: Neural Comput. Appl – volume: 14220 start-page: 425 year: 2023 end-page: 434 ident: b38 article-title: Multi-modal variational autoencoders for normative modelling across multiple imaging modalities publication-title: Proc. MICCAI – volume: 52 start-page: 141 year: 2004 end-page: 146 ident: b23 article-title: Modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high-resolution T1 mapping of the heart publication-title: Magn Reson. Med – start-page: 709 year: 1983 end-page: 720 ident: b25 article-title: A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, part i publication-title: J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. – volume: 10 year: 2023 ident: b16 article-title: Pixel-wise statistical analysis of myocardial injury in STEMI patients with delayed enhancement MRI publication-title: Front.: Cardiovasc. Med – year: 2023 ident: b22 article-title: MRI questions – volume: 64 start-page: 1217 year: 2014 end-page: 1226 ident: b3 article-title: Comprehensive prognosis assessment by CMR imaging after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction publication-title: J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. – volume: 5 start-page: 480 year: 2019 end-page: 489 ident: b8 article-title: Entropy as a novel measure of myocardial tissue heterogeneity for prediction of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in post-infarct patients publication-title: JACC: Clin Electrophysiol – year: 2024 ident: b31 article-title: Automated inversion time selection for late gadolinium–enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging publication-title: Eur Radiol – volume: 36 start-page: 877 year: 2023 end-page: 885 ident: b32 article-title: Automated inversion time selection for black-blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiac imaging in clinical practice publication-title: MAGMA – volume: 137 start-page: 1949 year: 2018 end-page: 1964 ident: b1 article-title: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: Recent advances, controversies, and future directions publication-title: Circul. – volume: 9 start-page: 67 year: 2016 end-page: 81 ident: b10 article-title: T1 mapping: basic techniques and clinical applications publication-title: JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging – volume: 7 start-page: 238 year: 2021 end-page: 249 ident: b40 article-title: Late-gadolinium enhancement interface area and electrophysiological simulations predict arrhythmic events in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy publication-title: JACC Clin Electrophysiol – volume: 193 start-page: 381 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b7 article-title: Three-dimensional phase-sensitive inversion-recovery turbo FLASH sequence for the evaluation of left ventricular myocardial scar publication-title: AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1952 – start-page: 1 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b35 article-title: Understanding how image quality affects deep neural networks publication-title: Proc. IEEE QoMEX – start-page: 307 year: 1986 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b26 article-title: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 – volume: 53 start-page: 2249 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b29 article-title: Impact of age on systemic inflammatory profile of patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction and acute ischemic stroke publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.036806 – start-page: 255 year: 1989 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b27 article-title: A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility publication-title: Biometrics – volume: 13 start-page: 21 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b36 article-title: Influence of image quality and light consistency on the performance of convolutional neural networks for weed mapping publication-title: Remote. Sens. – volume: 55 start-page: 1 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b2 article-title: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial infarction: current and emerging applications publication-title: J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.059 – volume: 35 start-page: 1798 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b14 article-title: Representation learning: a review and new perspectives publication-title: IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50 – volume: 9 start-page: 67 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b10 article-title: T1 mapping: basic techniques and clinical applications publication-title: JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging – volume: 7 start-page: 238 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b40 article-title: Late-gadolinium enhancement interface area and electrophysiological simulations predict arrhythmic events in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy publication-title: JACC Clin Electrophysiol doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.036 – year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b31 article-title: Automated inversion time selection for late gadolinium–enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10630-w – volume: 3 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b5 article-title: Contemporary cardiovascular imaging methods for the assessment of at-risk myocardium publication-title: J Am Hear. Assoc – volume: 34 start-page: 1374 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b41 article-title: Head-to-head comparison of eight late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac MR (LGE CMR) sequences at 1.5 tesla: From bench to bedside publication-title: J. Magn. Reson. Imaging doi: 10.1002/jmri.22783 – volume: 278 start-page: 374 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b11 article-title: Myocardial late gadolinium enhancement: Accuracy of T1 mapping–based synthetic inversion-recovery imaging publication-title: Radiol. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150162 – volume: 15 start-page: 783 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b34 article-title: Entropy as a measure of myocardial tissue heterogeneity in patients with ventricular arrhythmias publication-title: JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging – year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b18 article-title: Auto-encoding variational Bayes publication-title: Proc. ICLR – year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b22 – volume: 36 start-page: 877 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b32 article-title: Automated inversion time selection for black-blood late gadolinium enhancement cardiac imaging in clinical practice publication-title: MAGMA doi: 10.1007/s10334-023-01101-2 – volume: 17 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b21 article-title: CMRSegTools: An open-source software enabling reproducible research in segmentation of acute myocardial infarct in CMR images publication-title: PLoS One – start-page: 709 year: 1983 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b25 article-title: A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, part i publication-title: J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. – volume: 10 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b16 article-title: Pixel-wise statistical analysis of myocardial injury in STEMI patients with delayed enhancement MRI publication-title: Front.: Cardiovasc. Med – volume: 150 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b30 article-title: Determination of scar area using native and post-contrast T1 mapping: Agreement with late gadolinium enhancement publication-title: Eur. J. Radiol. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110242 – year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b13 – volume: 5 start-page: 480 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b8 article-title: Entropy as a novel measure of myocardial tissue heterogeneity for prediction of ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in post-infarct patients publication-title: JACC: Clin Electrophysiol – volume: 33 start-page: 4429 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b20 article-title: Attribute-based regularization of latent spaces for variational auto-encoders publication-title: Neural Comput. Appl doi: 10.1007/s00521-020-05270-2 – volume: 45 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b28 article-title: A proposal for strength-of-agreement criteria for Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient publication-title: NIWA Client Rep.: HAM2005– 062 – volume: 109 start-page: 256 year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b33 article-title: Fully automated contrast selection of joint bright- and black-blood late gadolinium enhancement imaging for robust myocardial scar assessment publication-title: Magn. Reson. Imaging doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.03.035 – volume: 12 start-page: 1177 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b9 article-title: Left ventricular entropy is a novel predictor of arrhythmic events in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy receiving defibrillators for primary prevention publication-title: JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging – volume: 15 start-page: 1563 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b15 article-title: Understanding and improving risk assessment after myocardial infarction using automated left ventricular shape analysis publication-title: JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging – volume: 268 year: 2024 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b39 article-title: MC-RVAE: Multi-channel recurrent variational autoencoder for multimodal Alzheimer’s disease progression modelling publication-title: Neuroimage – volume: 80 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b19 article-title: Learning disentangled representations in the imaging domain publication-title: Med Image Anal doi: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102516 – volume: 52 start-page: 141 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b23 article-title: Modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high-resolution T1 mapping of the heart publication-title: Magn Reson. Med doi: 10.1002/mrm.20110 – volume: 25 start-page: 18 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b6 article-title: Revisiting how we perform late gadolinium enhancement CMR: insights gleaned over 25 years of clinical practice publication-title: J Cardiovasc. Magn Reson. doi: 10.1186/s12968-023-00925-0 – volume: 64 start-page: 1217 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b3 article-title: Comprehensive prognosis assessment by CMR imaging after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction publication-title: J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1194 – volume: 17 start-page: 1 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b12 article-title: Quantification of myocardial late gadolinium enhancement using synthetic inversion recovery imaging publication-title: J Cardiovasc. Magn Reson. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-O8 – volume: 97 start-page: 302 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b37 article-title: Sparse multi-channel variational autoencoder for the joint analysis of heterogeneous data publication-title: Proc. ICML – volume: 137 start-page: 1949 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b1 article-title: Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: Recent advances, controversies, and future directions publication-title: Circul. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030693 – volume: 184 start-page: 232 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b17 article-title: Auto-encoder based dimensionality reduction publication-title: Neurocomputing doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.104 – volume: 22 start-page: 984 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b4 article-title: Quantitative relation of myocardial infarct size and myocardial viability by positron emission tomography to left ventricular ejection fraction and 3-year mortality with and without revascularization publication-title: J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90407-R – volume: 96 start-page: 608 year: 1992 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b24 article-title: Quantification of T1 values by SNAPSHOT-FLASH NMR imaging publication-title: J Magn Reson. – volume: 14220 start-page: 425 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643_b38 article-title: Multi-modal variational autoencoders for normative modelling across multiple imaging modalities publication-title: Proc. MICCAI |
SSID | ssj0004030 |
Score | 2.418318 |
Snippet | Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) images are crucial elements of CMR protocols for evaluating myocardial infarct (MI) severity and size. However, these images... AbstractPurpose:Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) images are crucial elements of CMR protocols for evaluating myocardial infarct (MI) severity and size.... |
SourceID | hal proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 110643 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Cardiac magnetic resonance Computer Science Contrast Media Dimensionality reduction Female Gadolinium Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Internal Medicine Late gadolinium enhancement Machine Learning Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Medical Imaging Middle Aged Myocardial infarction Myocardial Infarction - diagnostic imaging Other Representation learning Retrospective Studies ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - diagnostic imaging |
Title | Comparison of synthetic LGE with optimal inversion time vs. conventional LGE via representation learning: Quantification of Bias in Population Analysis |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0010482525009941 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0010482525009941 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110643 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40675093 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3231266059 https://hal.science/hal-05225924 |
Volume | 196 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB6VIiEuiDcLpTKIa9rEdh6G03bVskBbgUSl3iw7tmkqka3I7kpc-Bv8Xcaxk4KgUiUuq91sbCfxeOab-JsZgFcIoY2pTZnklS3RQaldoozSSZUpzYxWmvcp84-Oi_kJf3-an27AbIiF8bTKqPuDTu-1dTyyG5_m7kXT-BhfdCXQwUEjjjCnD17nvPRSvvPjkubBUxbCUFDf-LMjmydwvDxtO4S5o6dIc8-JLzi7ykTdOPNcyauAaG-QDu7CnYgkyTRc7D3YsO19uHUU98ofwM_ZWGKQLBzpvreI9fBccvh2n_jXr2SB6uIrdtG06_DWjPhK82Td7ZDfyeh9g3WjSJ8AcwhWakksOPHlNfm0UoFzFP7A0fYa1WG_5ONYH4wM6U8ewsnB_ufZPIllGJKaVXSZOJPRFG2d5lq4MrUFpSXNK-pslmlRGvzmN281ddQyrQp06JxViAuEKh1-sEew2S5a-wRIjiC5yNBF4sbwmqaiokqJ2glB61RVbALZ8OTlRci2IQca2rm8nC3pZ0uG2ZqAGKZIDtGkqP8kmoRrtC3_1dZ2cSF3MpMdlan8S9gm8GZs-Ye8XnPclyhL4y36FN_z6aH0x1IExDk6xWsc4sUgahLXvN_IUa1drDrJEJQjsEJkPIHHQQbHvrh3AVPBnv7XBT6D2_5XINNtweby28o-R_S11Nv98tqGm9N3H-bHvwCPmDBU |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3db9MwED-NTgJeEJ-jbIBBvIYlzqfZU6k2MtZWIG3S3iw7tiFIpBNpK_GX7N_lHDsZCCZN4iWKkp6dxue738W_OwO8QQitVKXyIC10jgFKZQKhhAyKSMhYSSGTrmT-fJGVZ8nH8_R8C6Z9LoylVXrb72x6Z639lX3_Nvcv6trm-GIogQEOOnGEOTZ5fdtWp0pHsD05PikXV-mRYewyUdDkWAFP6HE0L8vcdpnuGCzS1NLisyS-zkvd-mrpktdh0c4nHd2Hex5Mkol73gewpZuHcHvul8sfweV02GWQLA1pfzYI9_C3ZPbhkNgvsGSJFuM7NlE3G_fhjNjN5smmfUt-56N3AptakK4GZp-v1BC_58SXd-TzWjjakbuBvb2vRYvtkk_DFmGkr4DyGM6ODk-nZeB3YgiquKCrwKiIhujuZCKZyUOdUZrTtKBGR5FkucIzu34rqaE6liLDmM5ogdCAidzgIX4Co2bZ6KdAUsTJWYRRUqJUUtGQFVQIVhnGaBWKIh5D1L95fuEKbvCeifaNX40Wt6PF3WiNgfVDxPuEUjSBHL3CDWTzf8nq1s_llke8pTzkf-nbGA4GyT9U9ob9vkZdGv6irfJdTmbcXgsRE6cYF2-wi1e9qnGc9nYtRzR6uW55jLgcsRWC4zHsOB0c2kpsFBiy-Nl_PeBLuFOezmd8drw42YW79o7j1u3BaPVjrZ8jGFvJF36y_QLghTMF |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+synthetic+LGE+with+optimal+inversion+time+vs.+conventional+LGE+via+representation+learning%3A+Quantification+of+Bias+in+Population+Analysis&rft.jtitle=Computers+in+biology+and+medicine&rft.au=Deleat-Besson%2C+Romain&rft.au=Viallon%2C+Magalie&rft.au=Petrusca%2C+Lorena&rft.au=Croisille%2C+Pierre&rft.date=2025-09-01&rft.eissn=1879-0534&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=Pt+B&rft.spage=110643&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.compbiomed.2025.110643&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40675093&rft.externalDocID=40675093 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00104825%2Fcov200h.gif |