Influence of Graphite Powder on the Mechanical and Acoustic Emission Characteristics of Concrete

• Published in: Buildings (Basel) Vol. 12; no. 1; p. 18
• Main Authors: He, Wei, Hao, Wenru, Meng, Xia, Zhang, Pengchong, Sun, Xu, Shen, Yinlan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.01.2022
• Subjects: Acoustic emission; Acoustic emission testing; Acoustic properties; Acoustics; Bend strength; Carbon fibers; Cathodic protection; Cement; Compressive strength; Concrete; Damage; Defects; Emission analysis; Failure; failure prediction; Fracture toughness; Graphite; graphite concrete; Hydration; Interfacial bonding; Mechanical properties; Modulus of elasticity; Polyvinyl alcohol; Sensors; Signal processing; Strain gauges; Ultimate loads; Beijing China; China
• DOI: 10.3390/buildings12010018
• ISSN: 2075-5309

In this paper, uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) test and three-point bending (TPB) test, together with an acoustic emission (AE) system, were performed to investigate the mechanical properties and AE characteristic changes of concrete with different graphite powder (GP) content. The results show that: (1) Poor adhesion and low interlocking of graphite with cement stone increase the initial defects of concrete, reducing its elastic modulus and the cyclo-hoop effect, and thus weakening the compressive strength. (2) For concrete with a low graphite content, the second sharp rise in ringing counts or energy released during the compressive process can be regarded as a failure alarm. However, as GP content increases, the second sharp rise fades away, while the first sharp rise becomes more visible. At high GP content, the first sharp rise is better for predicting failure. (3) The initial defects caused by GP significantly lower the initial fracture toughness, but its bridging effect greatly increases the critical crack mouth opening displacement and thus significantly enhances the unstable fracture toughness of concrete, by up to 9.9% at 9% GP content. (4) In contrast to compressive process, the sharp increase in AE signals preceding failure during the fracture process cannot be used to predict failure because it occurs too close to the ultimate load. However, as GP can significantly increase the AE signals and damage value in the stable period, such failure precursor information can provide a safety warning for damage development.