GTKO rabbit: A novel animal model for preclinical assessment of decellularized xenogeneic grafts via in situ implantation
Wild type (WT) animals cannot be used to objectively assess the immunogenicity of animal tissue-derived biomaterials when used as recipients due to difference with human in α-Gal expression. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences of immunological responses between the GGTA1 gene-kno...
Saved in:
| Published in | Materials today bio Vol. 18; p. 100505 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Elsevier Ltd
01.02.2023
Elsevier |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 2590-0064 2590-0064 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505 |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Wild type (WT) animals cannot be used to objectively assess the immunogenicity of animal tissue-derived biomaterials when used as recipients due to difference with human in α-Gal expression. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences of immunological responses between the GGTA1 gene-knockout (GTKO) rabbits and WT rabbits after implantation with animal tissue-derived biomaterials. The porcine-derived decellularized bone matrix (natural bone material, NBM) and fresh porcine cancellous bone (PCB) were implanted in GTKO rabbits and WT rabbits, respectively, and sham operation was used as control (Con). At 2- and 6-week post-implantation, the related immunological items including antibody levels, serum-mediated cell lysis, cytokines, lymphocyte subtypes, and histopathological changes were assessed.
GTKO rabbits exhibited more sensitive immune responses than WT rabbits after PCB implantation, resulted from a significant increase of antibodies (except total antibodies) and cytokines levels, cell lysis ratios, CD4/CD8 proportions, and inflammatory cells infiltration. Immunological factors and inflammatory cells infiltrate in GTKO rabbits after NBM implantation were significantly lower than those in the PCB group. Among the three groups, the NBM group showed the highest contents of new bone formation elements.
In conclusion, the GTKO rabbit is a more sensitive alternative model than WT rabbit for preclinical study of xenografts via in situ implantation. Studies on multiple gene-edited animals are also necessary for more comprehensively evaluating xenoimmunologen risks of animal tissue-derived biomaterials in the future. Additionally, the immunogenicity of NBM was remarkably decreased compared to PCB.
[Display omitted] |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Wild type (WT) animals cannot be used to objectively assess the immunogenicity of animal tissue-derived biomaterials when used as recipients due to difference with human in α-Gal expression. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences of immunological responses between the GGTA1 gene-knockout (GTKO) rabbits and WT rabbits after implantation with animal tissue-derived biomaterials. The porcine-derived decellularized bone matrix (natural bone material, NBM) and fresh porcine cancellous bone (PCB) were implanted in GTKO rabbits and WT rabbits, respectively, and sham operation was used as control (Con). At 2- and 6-week post-implantation, the related immunological items including antibody levels, serum-mediated cell lysis, cytokines, lymphocyte subtypes, and histopathological changes were assessed. GTKO rabbits exhibited more sensitive immune responses than WT rabbits after PCB implantation, resulted from a significant increase of antibodies (except total antibodies) and cytokines levels, cell lysis ratios, CD4/CD8 proportions, and inflammatory cells infiltration. Immunological factors and inflammatory cells infiltrate in GTKO rabbits after NBM implantation were significantly lower than those in the PCB group. Among the three groups, the NBM group showed the highest contents of new bone formation elements. In conclusion, the GTKO rabbit is a more sensitive alternative model than WT rabbit for preclinical study of xenografts via in situ implantation. Studies on multiple gene-edited animals are also necessary for more comprehensively evaluating xenoimmunologen risks of animal tissue-derived biomaterials in the future. Additionally, the immunogenicity of NBM was remarkably decreased compared to PCB.Wild type (WT) animals cannot be used to objectively assess the immunogenicity of animal tissue-derived biomaterials when used as recipients due to difference with human in α-Gal expression. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences of immunological responses between the GGTA1 gene-knockout (GTKO) rabbits and WT rabbits after implantation with animal tissue-derived biomaterials. The porcine-derived decellularized bone matrix (natural bone material, NBM) and fresh porcine cancellous bone (PCB) were implanted in GTKO rabbits and WT rabbits, respectively, and sham operation was used as control (Con). At 2- and 6-week post-implantation, the related immunological items including antibody levels, serum-mediated cell lysis, cytokines, lymphocyte subtypes, and histopathological changes were assessed. GTKO rabbits exhibited more sensitive immune responses than WT rabbits after PCB implantation, resulted from a significant increase of antibodies (except total antibodies) and cytokines levels, cell lysis ratios, CD4/CD8 proportions, and inflammatory cells infiltration. Immunological factors and inflammatory cells infiltrate in GTKO rabbits after NBM implantation were significantly lower than those in the PCB group. Among the three groups, the NBM group showed the highest contents of new bone formation elements. In conclusion, the GTKO rabbit is a more sensitive alternative model than WT rabbit for preclinical study of xenografts via in situ implantation. Studies on multiple gene-edited animals are also necessary for more comprehensively evaluating xenoimmunologen risks of animal tissue-derived biomaterials in the future. Additionally, the immunogenicity of NBM was remarkably decreased compared to PCB. Wild type (WT) animals cannot be used to objectively assess the immunogenicity of animal tissue-derived biomaterials when used as recipients due to difference with human in α-Gal expression. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences of immunological responses between the GGTA1 gene-knockout (GTKO) rabbits and WT rabbits after implantation with animal tissue-derived biomaterials. The porcine-derived decellularized bone matrix (natural bone material, NBM) and fresh porcine cancellous bone (PCB) were implanted in GTKO rabbits and WT rabbits, respectively, and sham operation was used as control (Con). At 2- and 6-week post-implantation, the related immunological items including antibody levels, serum-mediated cell lysis, cytokines, lymphocyte subtypes, and histopathological changes were assessed.GTKO rabbits exhibited more sensitive immune responses than WT rabbits after PCB implantation, resulted from a significant increase of antibodies (except total antibodies) and cytokines levels, cell lysis ratios, CD4/CD8 proportions, and inflammatory cells infiltration. Immunological factors and inflammatory cells infiltrate in GTKO rabbits after NBM implantation were significantly lower than those in the PCB group. Among the three groups, the NBM group showed the highest contents of new bone formation elements.In conclusion, the GTKO rabbit is a more sensitive alternative model than WT rabbit for preclinical study of xenografts via in situ implantation. Studies on multiple gene-edited animals are also necessary for more comprehensively evaluating xenoimmunologen risks of animal tissue-derived biomaterials in the future. Additionally, the immunogenicity of NBM was remarkably decreased compared to PCB. Wild type (WT) animals cannot be used to objectively assess the immunogenicity of animal tissue-derived biomaterials when used as recipients due to difference with human in α-Gal expression. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences of immunological responses between the GGTA1 gene-knockout (GTKO) rabbits and WT rabbits after implantation with animal tissue-derived biomaterials. The porcine-derived decellularized bone matrix (natural bone material, NBM) and fresh porcine cancellous bone (PCB) were implanted in GTKO rabbits and WT rabbits, respectively, and sham operation was used as control (Con). At 2- and 6-week post-implantation, the related immunological items including antibody levels, serum-mediated cell lysis, cytokines, lymphocyte subtypes, and histopathological changes were assessed. GTKO rabbits exhibited more sensitive immune responses than WT rabbits after PCB implantation, resulted from a significant increase of antibodies (except total antibodies) and cytokines levels, cell lysis ratios, CD4/CD8 proportions, and inflammatory cells infiltration. Immunological factors and inflammatory cells infiltrate in GTKO rabbits after NBM implantation were significantly lower than those in the PCB group. Among the three groups, the NBM group showed the highest contents of new bone formation elements. In conclusion, the GTKO rabbit is a more sensitive alternative model than WT rabbit for preclinical study of xenografts via in situ implantation. Studies on multiple gene-edited animals are also necessary for more comprehensively evaluating xenoimmunologen risks of animal tissue-derived biomaterials in the future. Additionally, the immunogenicity of NBM was remarkably decreased compared to PCB. [Display omitted] Wild type (WT) animals cannot be used to objectively assess the immunogenicity of animal tissue-derived biomaterials when used as recipients due to difference with human in α-Gal expression. The purpose of this study is to compare the differences of immunological responses between the GGTA1 gene-knockout (GTKO) rabbits and WT rabbits after implantation with animal tissue-derived biomaterials. The porcine-derived decellularized bone matrix (natural bone material, NBM) and fresh porcine cancellous bone (PCB) were implanted in GTKO rabbits and WT rabbits, respectively, and sham operation was used as control (Con). At 2- and 6-week post-implantation, the related immunological items including antibody levels, serum-mediated cell lysis, cytokines, lymphocyte subtypes, and histopathological changes were assessed. GTKO rabbits exhibited more sensitive immune responses than WT rabbits after PCB implantation, resulted from a significant increase of antibodies (except total antibodies) and cytokines levels, cell lysis ratios, CD4/CD8 proportions, and inflammatory cells infiltration. Immunological factors and inflammatory cells infiltrate in GTKO rabbits after NBM implantation were significantly lower than those in the PCB group. Among the three groups, the NBM group showed the highest contents of new bone formation elements. In conclusion, the GTKO rabbit is a more sensitive alternative model than WT rabbit for preclinical study of xenografts via in situ implantation. Studies on multiple gene-edited animals are also necessary for more comprehensively evaluating xenoimmunologen risks of animal tissue-derived biomaterials in the future. Additionally, the immunogenicity of NBM was remarkably decreased compared to PCB. Image 1 |
| ArticleNumber | 100505 |
| Author | Chen, Liang Qu, Shuxin Shao, Anliang Zhang, Yu Mu, Yufeng Xu, Liming Wei, Lina Hao, Feng |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yufeng surname: Mu fullname: Mu, Yufeng organization: Institute for Medical Device Control, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 102629, China – sequence: 2 givenname: Yu surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Yu organization: Zhejiang Decellmatrix Biotech Co, Ltd, Hangzhou, 310016, China – sequence: 3 givenname: Lina surname: Wei fullname: Wei, Lina organization: Institute for Medical Device Control, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 102629, China – sequence: 4 givenname: Liang surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Liang organization: Institute for Medical Device Control, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 102629, China – sequence: 5 givenname: Feng surname: Hao fullname: Hao, Feng organization: Zhejiang Decellmatrix Biotech Co, Ltd, Hangzhou, 310016, China – sequence: 6 givenname: Anliang surname: Shao fullname: Shao, Anliang email: shaoanliang@nifdc.org.cn organization: Institute for Medical Device Control, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 102629, China – sequence: 7 givenname: Shuxin surname: Qu fullname: Qu, Shuxin email: qushuxin@swjtu.edu.cn organization: School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, 610031, China – sequence: 8 givenname: Liming orcidid: 0000-0002-3577-0959 surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Liming email: xuliming@nifdc.org.cn organization: Institute for Medical Device Control, National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, 102629, China |
| BookMark | eNp9kUtvEzEUhUeoSJTSX8DGSzZJ_ZrxGAmkqqKlolI3ZW35cSc48tjBdiLKr8fpVIhuWNk-vvfY93xvu5OYInTde4LXBJPhYrueq_FpTTGlTcE97l91p7SXeIXxwE_-2b_pzkvZYoypkBxjedo93jx8u0dZG-PrR3SJYjpAQDr6WQc0J9cOU8pol8EGH71tqi4FSpkhVpQm5MBCCPugs_8NDv2CmDYQwVu0yXqqBR28Rj6i4use-XkXdKy6-hTfda8nHQqcP69n3ffrLw9XX1d39ze3V5d3K8tGWlej0UzSvndUwkDbPxmhRLKeT4yI3oycSMmn3mmBKQNiRmoM4YPhBthkBsHOutvF1yW9VbvcJsuPKmmvnoSUN0rn6m0ANdEBi3EiguKRD3KUWAjpqLbMaum4bV6fF6_d3szgbMsg6_DC9OVN9D_UJh2UFEQ2NM3gw7NBTj_3UKqafTkGqCOkfVFUcEGFEJy3UraU2pxKyTD9fYZgdQSvtuoJvDqCVwv41vVp6YIW6cFDVsV6iBacbwhrm9n_t_8P5k-6sA |
| Cites_doi | 10.1002/jez.b.21072 10.1155/2022/7950834 10.1002/term.3004 10.1007/s12026-018-8985-8 10.1038/s41598-018-32959-1 10.1002/jbm.b.30951 10.4103/0971-6580.94513 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 10.1155/2020/9680474 10.1097/00007890-199601150-00004 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.003 10.1080/21691401.2018.1493489 10.1097/TP.0b013e318199c34f 10.1084/jem.160.5.1519 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2005.01441.x 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.030 10.1007/s11248-021-00271-w 10.1089/ten.teb.2014.0392 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.012 10.1084/jem.162.2.573 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.003 10.1002/jbm.a.33061 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.024 10.1186/s12863-022-01068-4 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120603 10.4103/1735-3327.92960 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.006 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.078 10.1097/00007890-199804270-00020 10.1093/rb/rbaa020 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2022 The Authors 2022 The Authors. 2022 The Authors 2022 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 The Authors – notice: 2022 The Authors. – notice: 2022 The Authors 2022 |
| DBID | 6I. AAFTH AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505 |
| DatabaseName | ScienceDirect Open Access Titles Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Engineering |
| EISSN | 2590-0064 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_f26078f17208469890779d2ac3ca9d4c PMC9719100 10_1016_j_mtbio_2022_100505 S2590006422003039 |
| GroupedDBID | 0SF 6I. AAEDW AAFTH AALRI AAXUO ACLIJ AEXQZ AITUG ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ EBS EJD FDB GROUPED_DOAJ M41 M~E NCXOZ OK1 ROL RPM SSZ 0R~ 53G AAYWO AAYXX ACVFH ADCNI ADVLN AEUPX AFJKZ AFPUW AIGII AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP APXCP CITATION 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-8ba39255d29e62abb31219354f3175b841994f5da7023e1b82bb146b4be3fb673 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISSN | 2590-0064 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:35 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:38:42 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 03:36:52 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:52:23 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 25 20:56:41 EDT 2023 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Keywords | Graft material-specific antibody Xenograft Immunogenicity evaluation anti-Gal antibody α-Gal GTKO rabbit In situ implantation |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c382t-8ba39255d29e62abb31219354f3175b841994f5da7023e1b82bb146b4be3fb673 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 These authors contributed equally to this study. |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3577-0959 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/f26078f17208469890779d2ac3ca9d4c |
| PQID | 2747277744 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f26078f17208469890779d2ac3ca9d4c pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9719100 proquest_miscellaneous_2747277744 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mtbio_2022_100505 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_mtbio_2022_100505 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2023-02-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-02-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2023 text: 2023-02-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationTitle | Materials today bio |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Ltd Elsevier |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd – name: Elsevier |
| References | Umashankar, Arun, Kumari (bib26) 2011; 97 Wong, Wong, Vapniarsky (bib17) 2016; 92 Galili, Latemple, Radic (bib21) 1998; 65 Anderson, Rodriguez, Chang (bib33) 2008; 20 Shao, Ling, Chen (bib13) 2020; 2020 Umashankar, Mohanan, Kumari (bib25) 2012; 19 Wang, Ruan, Zhang (bib35) 2019; 33 Gates, Xing, Griffiths (bib28) 2019; 13 Konakci K, Bohle, Blumer (bib8) 2005; 35 Shao, Ling, Xu (bib12) 2018; 46 Galili (bib2) 2015; 21 Bayly-Jones, Bubeck, Dunstone (bib31) 2017 Gates, Griffiths (bib27) 2018; 66 Lu, Shao, Shan (bib19) 2018; 8 Galili (bib6) 1999; 32 Ezzelarab M, Garcia B, Azimzadeh A, et al. The innate immune response and activation of coagulation in α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout xenograft recipients [J]. Transplantation, 87(6): 805-812. Chen, Wei, Shao (bib10) 2020; 7 Zippel, Wilhelm, Hoene (bib24) 2008; 85 Mu, Wu (bib29) 2021; 25 Franz, Rammelt, Scharnweber (bib32) 2011; 32 Aamodt, Grainger (bib3) 2016; 86 Wei, Mu, Deng (bib18) 2022; 23 Galili, Rachmilewitz, Peleg (bib4) 1984; 160 Kuljanin, Brown, Raleigh (bib22) 2017; 144 Naso, Gandaglia, Iop (bib20) 2011; 7 Galili, Macher, Buehler (bib5) 1985; 162 Shim, Ko, Kim (bib36) 2021; 30 Fang, Qiu, Xia (bib23) 2021; 268 Roy, Jinno-Oue, Shinagawa (bib7) 2006; 306B Thomas, Bhat, Mapara (bib16) 2012; 9 Mu, Shao, Shi (bib14) 2022; 2022 Griffiths, Choe, Reardon (bib15) 2008; 29 Tearle, Tange, Zannettino (bib11) 1996; 61 Badylak, Gilbert (bib34) 2008; 20 Bilodeau, Goltsis, Rogers (bib1) 2020; 14 Alegre (bib30) 2019 Aamodt (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib3) 2016; 86 Galili (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib5) 1985; 162 Fang (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib23) 2021; 268 Shim (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib36) 2021; 30 Mu (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib29) 2021; 25 Franz (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib32) 2011; 32 Galili (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib6) 1999; 32 Lu (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib19) 2018; 8 Mu (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib14) 2022; 2022 Tearle (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib11) 1996; 61 Umashankar (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib25) 2012; 19 Konakci K (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib8) 2005; 35 Thomas (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib16) 2012; 9 Zippel (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib24) 2008; 85 Gates (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib27) 2018; 66 Badylak (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib34) 2008; 20 Umashankar (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib26) 2011; 97 Shao (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib12) 2018; 46 Galili (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib21) 1998; 65 Galili (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib4) 1984; 160 Wei (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib18) 2022; 23 Chen (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib10) 2020; 7 Naso (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib20) 2011; 7 Kuljanin (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib22) 2017; 144 Alegre (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib30) 2019 Shao (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib13) 2020; 2020 Wong (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib17) 2016; 92 Bilodeau (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib1) 2020; 14 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib9 Wang (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib35) 2019; 33 Anderson (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib33) 2008; 20 Gates (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib28) 2019; 13 Galili (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib2) 2015; 21 Griffiths (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib15) 2008; 29 Bayly-Jones (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib31) 2017 Roy (10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib7) 2006; 306B |
| References_xml | – volume: 97 start-page: 311 year: 2011 end-page: 320 ident: bib26 article-title: Short duration gluteraldehyde cross linking of decellularized bovine pericardium improves biological response [J] publication-title: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. – volume: 14 start-page: 521 year: 2020 end-page: 538 ident: bib1 article-title: Limitations of recellularized biological scaffolds for human transplantation [J] publication-title: J Tissue Eng Regen Med – volume: 25 start-page: 281 year: 2021 end-page: 285 ident: bib29 article-title: Development and evaluation of alpha-galactosyl antigen-deficient rabbit model [J] publication-title: Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res. – start-page: 137 year: 2019 end-page: 164 ident: bib30 article-title: Monoclonal Antibodies in Transplantation [M]. Antibody Therapeutics – volume: 2022 year: 2022 ident: bib14 article-title: Immunological risk assessment of xenogeneic dural patch by comparing with raw material via GTKO mice [J] publication-title: BioMed Res. Int. – volume: 92 start-page: 1 year: 2016 end-page: 12 ident: bib17 article-title: In vivo xenogeneic scaffold fate is determined by residual antigenicity and extracellular matrix preservation [J] publication-title: Biomaterials – volume: 66 start-page: 288 year: 2018 end-page: 298 ident: bib27 article-title: Chronic graft-specific cell-mediated immune response toward candidate xenogeneic biomaterial [J] publication-title: Immunol. Res. – volume: 7 start-page: 427 year: 2020 end-page: 434 ident: bib10 article-title: Immune risk assessment of residual alphaGal in xenogeneic decellularized cornea using GTKO mice [J] publication-title: Regen Biomater – volume: 86 start-page: 68 year: 2016 end-page: 82 ident: bib3 article-title: Extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffolds and the host response [J] publication-title: Biomaterials – volume: 35 start-page: 17 year: 2005 end-page: 23 ident: bib8 article-title: Alpha-Gal on bioprostheses: xenograft immune response in cardiac surgery [J] publication-title: Eur. J. Clin. Invest. – volume: 85 start-page: 334 year: 2008 end-page: 342 ident: bib24 article-title: Local tissue reaction and differentiation of the prosthesis-specific antibody response following functional implantation of vascular grafts in pigs [J] publication-title: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. – volume: 268 year: 2021 ident: bib23 article-title: Extracellular matrix scaffold crosslinked with vancomycin for multifunctional antibacterial bone infection therapy publication-title: Biomaterials – volume: 33 start-page: 235 year: 2019 end-page: 243 ident: bib35 article-title: Antigenicity of tissues and organs from GGTA1/CMAH/beta 4GalNT2 triple gene knockout pigs [J] publication-title: J Biomed Res – volume: 2020 year: 2020 ident: bib13 article-title: GGTA1/iGb3S double knockout mice: immunological properties and immunogenicity response to xenogeneic bone matrix [J] publication-title: BioMed Res. Int. – volume: 46 start-page: S359 year: 2018 end-page: S369 ident: bib12 article-title: Xenogeneic bone matrix immune risk assessment using GGTA1 knockout mice [J] publication-title: Artif. Cell Nanomed. Biotechnol. – volume: 61 start-page: 13 year: 1996 end-page: 19 ident: bib11 article-title: The alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout mouse. Implications for xenotransplantation [J] publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 23 start-page: 54 year: 2022 ident: bib18 article-title: alpha-Gal antigen-deficient rabbits with GGTA1 gene disruption via CRISPR/Cas9 [J] publication-title: BMC Genom Data – volume: 9 year: 2012 ident: bib16 article-title: Rabbit as an animal model for experimental research [J] publication-title: Dent. Res. J. – volume: 306B start-page: 59 year: 2006 end-page: 69 ident: bib7 article-title: Isolation of the feline α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene, expression in transfected human cells and its phylogenetic analysis [J] publication-title: J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. – volume: 19 start-page: 51 year: 2012 ident: bib25 article-title: Glutaraldehyde treatment elicits toxic response compared to decellularization in bovine pericardium [J] publication-title: Toxicol. Int. – volume: 20 start-page: 109 year: 2008 end-page: 116 ident: bib34 article-title: Immune response to biologic scaffold materials [J] publication-title: Semin. Immunol. – volume: 32 start-page: 1 year: 1999 end-page: 23 ident: bib6 article-title: Evolution of alpha 1,3galactosyltransferase and of the alpha-Gal epitope [J] publication-title: Subcell. Biochem. – reference: Ezzelarab M, Garcia B, Azimzadeh A, et al. The innate immune response and activation of coagulation in α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout xenograft recipients [J]. Transplantation, 87(6): 805-812. – volume: 144 start-page: 130 year: 2017 end-page: 143 ident: bib22 article-title: Collagenase treatment enhances proteomic coverage of low-abundance proteins in decellularized matrix bioscaffolds [J] publication-title: Biomaterials – volume: 7 start-page: 1728 year: 2011 end-page: 1734 ident: bib20 article-title: First quantitative assay of alpha-Gal in soft tissues: presence and distribution of the epitope before and after cell removal from xenogeneic heart valves [J] publication-title: Acta Biomater. – volume: 8 year: 2018 ident: bib19 article-title: A standardized quantitative method for detecting remnant alpha-Gal antigen in animal tissues or animal tissue-derived biomaterials and its application [J] publication-title: Sci. Rep. – volume: 30 start-page: 619 year: 2021 end-page: 634 ident: bib36 article-title: Human immune reactivity of GGTA1/CMAH/A3GALT2 triple knockout Yucatan miniature pigs [J] publication-title: Transgenic Res. – volume: 65 start-page: 1129 year: 1998 end-page: 1132 ident: bib21 article-title: A sensitive assay for measuring alpha-Gal epitope expression on cells by a monoclonal anti-Gal antibody [J] publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 21 start-page: 231 year: 2015 end-page: 241 ident: bib2 article-title: Avoiding detrimental human immune response against Mammalian extracellular matrix implants [J] publication-title: Tissue Eng. B Rev. – volume: 20 start-page: 86 year: 2008 end-page: 100 ident: bib33 article-title: Foreign body reaction to biomaterials [J] publication-title: Semin. Immunol. – volume: 160 start-page: 1519 year: 1984 end-page: 1531 ident: bib4 article-title: A unique natural human IgG antibody with anti-alpha-galactosyl specificity [J] publication-title: J. Exp. Med. – volume: 13 year: 2019 ident: bib28 article-title: Immunoproteomic identification of noncarbohydrate antigens eliciting graft-specific adaptive immune responses in patients with bovine pericardial bioprosthetic heart valves [J] publication-title: Proteonomics Clin. Appl. – volume: 162 start-page: 573 year: 1985 end-page: 582 ident: bib5 article-title: Human natural anti-alpha-galactosyl IgG. II. The specific recognition of alpha (1----3)-linked galactose residues [J] publication-title: J. Exp. Med. – volume: 29 start-page: 3514 year: 2008 end-page: 3520 ident: bib15 article-title: Immunoproteomic identification of bovine pericardium xenoantigens [J] publication-title: Biomaterials – start-page: 372 year: 2017 ident: bib31 article-title: The mystery behind membrane insertion: a review of the complement membrane attack complex [J] publication-title: Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. – volume: 32 start-page: 6692 year: 2011 end-page: 6709 ident: bib32 article-title: Immune responses to implants–a review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials [J] publication-title: Biomaterials – volume: 306B start-page: 59 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib7 article-title: Isolation of the feline α1,3-galactosyltransferase gene, expression in transfected human cells and its phylogenetic analysis [J] publication-title: J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.21072 – volume: 32 start-page: 1 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib6 article-title: Evolution of alpha 1,3galactosyltransferase and of the alpha-Gal epitope [J] publication-title: Subcell. Biochem. – volume: 2022 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib14 article-title: Immunological risk assessment of xenogeneic dural patch by comparing with raw material via GTKO mice [J] publication-title: BioMed Res. Int. doi: 10.1155/2022/7950834 – volume: 14 start-page: 521 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib1 article-title: Limitations of recellularized biological scaffolds for human transplantation [J] publication-title: J Tissue Eng Regen Med doi: 10.1002/term.3004 – volume: 66 start-page: 288 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib27 article-title: Chronic graft-specific cell-mediated immune response toward candidate xenogeneic biomaterial [J] publication-title: Immunol. Res. doi: 10.1007/s12026-018-8985-8 – volume: 8 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib19 article-title: A standardized quantitative method for detecting remnant alpha-Gal antigen in animal tissues or animal tissue-derived biomaterials and its application [J] publication-title: Sci. Rep. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32959-1 – volume: 85 start-page: 334 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib24 article-title: Local tissue reaction and differentiation of the prosthesis-specific antibody response following functional implantation of vascular grafts in pigs [J] publication-title: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30951 – volume: 19 start-page: 51 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib25 article-title: Glutaraldehyde treatment elicits toxic response compared to decellularization in bovine pericardium [J] publication-title: Toxicol. Int. doi: 10.4103/0971-6580.94513 – volume: 13 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib28 article-title: Immunoproteomic identification of noncarbohydrate antigens eliciting graft-specific adaptive immune responses in patients with bovine pericardial bioprosthetic heart valves [J] publication-title: Proteonomics Clin. Appl. – start-page: 372 issue: 1726 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib31 article-title: The mystery behind membrane insertion: a review of the complement membrane attack complex [J] publication-title: Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. – volume: 20 start-page: 86 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib33 article-title: Foreign body reaction to biomaterials [J] publication-title: Semin. Immunol. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 – volume: 2020 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib13 article-title: GGTA1/iGb3S double knockout mice: immunological properties and immunogenicity response to xenogeneic bone matrix [J] publication-title: BioMed Res. Int. doi: 10.1155/2020/9680474 – volume: 33 start-page: 235 issue: 4 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib35 article-title: Antigenicity of tissues and organs from GGTA1/CMAH/beta 4GalNT2 triple gene knockout pigs [J] publication-title: J Biomed Res – volume: 61 start-page: 13 issue: 1 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib11 article-title: The alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout mouse. Implications for xenotransplantation [J] publication-title: Transplantation doi: 10.1097/00007890-199601150-00004 – volume: 86 start-page: 68 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib3 article-title: Extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffolds and the host response [J] publication-title: Biomaterials doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.003 – volume: 46 start-page: S359 issue: sup3 year: 2018 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib12 article-title: Xenogeneic bone matrix immune risk assessment using GGTA1 knockout mice [J] publication-title: Artif. Cell Nanomed. Biotechnol. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1493489 – ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib9 doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318199c34f – volume: 160 start-page: 1519 issue: 5 year: 1984 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib4 article-title: A unique natural human IgG antibody with anti-alpha-galactosyl specificity [J] publication-title: J. Exp. Med. doi: 10.1084/jem.160.5.1519 – volume: 35 start-page: 17 issue: 1 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib8 article-title: Alpha-Gal on bioprostheses: xenograft immune response in cardiac surgery [J] publication-title: Eur. J. Clin. Invest. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2005.01441.x – volume: 7 start-page: 1728 issue: 4 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib20 article-title: First quantitative assay of alpha-Gal in soft tissues: presence and distribution of the epitope before and after cell removal from xenogeneic heart valves [J] publication-title: Acta Biomater. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.11.030 – volume: 30 start-page: 619 issue: 5 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib36 article-title: Human immune reactivity of GGTA1/CMAH/A3GALT2 triple knockout Yucatan miniature pigs [J] publication-title: Transgenic Res. doi: 10.1007/s11248-021-00271-w – volume: 21 start-page: 231 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib2 article-title: Avoiding detrimental human immune response against Mammalian extracellular matrix implants [J] publication-title: Tissue Eng. B Rev. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2014.0392 – volume: 144 start-page: 130 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib22 article-title: Collagenase treatment enhances proteomic coverage of low-abundance proteins in decellularized matrix bioscaffolds [J] publication-title: Biomaterials doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.012 – volume: 162 start-page: 573 issue: 2 year: 1985 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib5 article-title: Human natural anti-alpha-galactosyl IgG. II. The specific recognition of alpha (1----3)-linked galactose residues [J] publication-title: J. Exp. Med. doi: 10.1084/jem.162.2.573 – start-page: 137 year: 2019 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib30 – volume: 20 start-page: 109 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib34 article-title: Immune response to biologic scaffold materials [J] publication-title: Semin. Immunol. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.003 – volume: 97 start-page: 311 issue: 3 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib26 article-title: Short duration gluteraldehyde cross linking of decellularized bovine pericardium improves biological response [J] publication-title: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.33061 – volume: 92 start-page: 1 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib17 article-title: In vivo xenogeneic scaffold fate is determined by residual antigenicity and extracellular matrix preservation [J] publication-title: Biomaterials doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.024 – volume: 25 start-page: 281 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib29 article-title: Development and evaluation of alpha-galactosyl antigen-deficient rabbit model [J] publication-title: Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res. – volume: 23 start-page: 54 issue: 1 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib18 article-title: alpha-Gal antigen-deficient rabbits with GGTA1 gene disruption via CRISPR/Cas9 [J] publication-title: BMC Genom Data doi: 10.1186/s12863-022-01068-4 – volume: 268 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib23 article-title: Extracellular matrix scaffold crosslinked with vancomycin for multifunctional antibacterial bone infection therapy publication-title: Biomaterials doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120603 – volume: 9 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib16 article-title: Rabbit as an animal model for experimental research [J] publication-title: Dent. Res. J. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.92960 – volume: 29 start-page: 3514 issue: 26 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib15 article-title: Immunoproteomic identification of bovine pericardium xenoantigens [J] publication-title: Biomaterials doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.006 – volume: 32 start-page: 6692 issue: 28 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib32 article-title: Immune responses to implants–a review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials [J] publication-title: Biomaterials doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.078 – volume: 65 start-page: 1129 issue: 8 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib21 article-title: A sensitive assay for measuring alpha-Gal epitope expression on cells by a monoclonal anti-Gal antibody [J] publication-title: Transplantation doi: 10.1097/00007890-199804270-00020 – volume: 7 start-page: 427 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505_bib10 article-title: Immune risk assessment of residual alphaGal in xenogeneic decellularized cornea using GTKO mice [J] publication-title: Regen Biomater doi: 10.1093/rb/rbaa020 |
| SSID | ssj0002794009 |
| Score | 2.2310946 |
| Snippet | Wild type (WT) animals cannot be used to objectively assess the immunogenicity of animal tissue-derived biomaterials when used as recipients due to difference... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 100505 |
| SubjectTerms | anti-Gal antibody Full Length Graft material-specific antibody GTKO rabbit Immunogenicity evaluation In situ implantation Xenograft α-Gal |
| Title | GTKO rabbit: A novel animal model for preclinical assessment of decellularized xenogeneic grafts via in situ implantation |
| URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100505 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2747277744 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9719100 https://doaj.org/article/f26078f17208469890779d2ac3ca9d4c |
| Volume | 18 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT3BAlIdYHpWROBKRtZ046a1FlAoEXFqpN8t2bHDVdVa72arl13fGSarkAheueU48Y883zsw3hLzn2vJGcpkttbRIql1kxjdN5urSgjteMptjgfP3H-Xpufh6UVxMWn1hTlhPD9wP3EcPgFtWHvxsXqVuh7mUdcPgFVbXjbC4-oLPmwRTl-l3Gjb8RuwL8B5Lp0sxUg6l5K5VZwKW_jGGaQIFNq-buKXE3j_zThP0Oc-dnDijkyfk8YAi6VEv_T554OJT8mjCLfiM3H45-_aTbrQxoTukRzS21-6K6hhWcGPqf0MBr9I1rHhDcSTV9yydtPW0cbipj1mq4Y9r6I2LLRibC5b-2mjfbel10DREug3djobV-kr3VUzxOTk_-Xz26TQb-ixkllesyyqjQS1F0bDalQzk4ktYx3ghPIILUwnkD_ZFoyU4eLc0FTMGFlgjjOPelJK_IHuxje4lAdE8N6B2I6wTwrOqKLmH6FvnJhdCFwvyYRxmte7pNNSYZ3apklYUakX1WlmQY1TF_aXIhZ0OgIWowULUvyxkQcpRkWqAFT1cgEeFv7_93ah2BZMOB11H1-62CkN5JgE5iwWRM3uYiTo_E8PvRN9dS4iR8_zV__i21-QhCMz7NPI3ZK_b7NxbQEmdOUgT4iBtX90BrpEQww |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GTKO+rabbit%3A+A+novel+animal+model+for+preclinical+assessment+of+decellularized+xenogeneic+grafts+via+in+situ+implantation&rft.jtitle=Materials+today+bio&rft.au=Mu%2C+Yufeng&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Yu&rft.au=Wei%2C+Lina&rft.au=Chen%2C+Liang&rft.date=2023-02-01&rft.issn=2590-0064&rft.eissn=2590-0064&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=100505&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.mtbio.2022.100505&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_mtbio_2022_100505 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2590-0064&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2590-0064&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2590-0064&client=summon |