Angular stability potentially permits fewer locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study

To compare mechanical stability of angle-stable locking construct with four screws with conventional five screw locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures under cyclic loading. Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae were intramedullary nailed and assigned to either an angle-st...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of orthopaedic trauma Vol. 25; no. 6; p. 340
Main Authors Gueorguiev, Boyko, Ockert, Ben, Schwieger, Karsten, Wähnert, Dirk, Lawson-Smith, Matthew, Windolf, Markus, Stoffel, Karl
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.06.2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To compare mechanical stability of angle-stable locking construct with four screws with conventional five screw locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures under cyclic loading. Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae were intramedullary nailed and assigned to either an angle-stable locking construct consisting of four screws or conventional five-screw locking. After simulating an unstable distal two-fragmental 42-A3.1 fracture, the specimens were mechanically tested under quasistatic and cyclic sinusoidal axial and torsional loading. Bending stiffness of the angle-stable and the conventional fixation was 644.3 N/° and 416.5 N/°, respectively (P = 0.075, power 0.434). Torsional stiffness of the angle-stable locking (1.91 Nm/°) was significantly higher compared with the conventional one (1.13 Nm/°; P = 0.001, power 0.981). Torsional play of the angle-stable fixation (0.08°) was significantly smaller compared with the conventional one (0.46°; P = 0.002, power 0.965). The angle-stable locking revealed significantly less torsional deformation in the fracture gap after one cycle (0.74°) than the conventional one (1.75°; P = 0.005, power 0.915) and also after 1000 cycles (angle-stable: 1.56°; conventional: 2.51°; P = 0.042, power 0.562). Modes of failure were fracture of the distal fragment, loosening of distal locking screws, nail breakage, and their combination, equally distributed between the groups (P = 0.325). Both the angle-stable locking technique using four screws and conventional locking consisting of five screws showed high biomechanical properties. Hence, angle-stable locking reflects a potential to maintain fixation stability while reducing the number of locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed unstable distal tibia fractures.
AbstractList To compare mechanical stability of angle-stable locking construct with four screws with conventional five screw locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures under cyclic loading. Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae were intramedullary nailed and assigned to either an angle-stable locking construct consisting of four screws or conventional five-screw locking. After simulating an unstable distal two-fragmental 42-A3.1 fracture, the specimens were mechanically tested under quasistatic and cyclic sinusoidal axial and torsional loading. Bending stiffness of the angle-stable and the conventional fixation was 644.3 N/° and 416.5 N/°, respectively (P = 0.075, power 0.434). Torsional stiffness of the angle-stable locking (1.91 Nm/°) was significantly higher compared with the conventional one (1.13 Nm/°; P = 0.001, power 0.981). Torsional play of the angle-stable fixation (0.08°) was significantly smaller compared with the conventional one (0.46°; P = 0.002, power 0.965). The angle-stable locking revealed significantly less torsional deformation in the fracture gap after one cycle (0.74°) than the conventional one (1.75°; P = 0.005, power 0.915) and also after 1000 cycles (angle-stable: 1.56°; conventional: 2.51°; P = 0.042, power 0.562). Modes of failure were fracture of the distal fragment, loosening of distal locking screws, nail breakage, and their combination, equally distributed between the groups (P = 0.325). Both the angle-stable locking technique using four screws and conventional locking consisting of five screws showed high biomechanical properties. Hence, angle-stable locking reflects a potential to maintain fixation stability while reducing the number of locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed unstable distal tibia fractures.
Author Windolf, Markus
Wähnert, Dirk
Lawson-Smith, Matthew
Schwieger, Karsten
Stoffel, Karl
Ockert, Ben
Gueorguiev, Boyko
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Boyko
  surname: Gueorguiev
  fullname: Gueorguiev, Boyko
  email: boyko.gueorguiev@aofoundation.org
  organization: AO Research Institute Davos, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland. boyko.gueorguiev@aofoundation.org
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ben
  surname: Ockert
  fullname: Ockert, Ben
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Karsten
  surname: Schwieger
  fullname: Schwieger, Karsten
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Dirk
  surname: Wähnert
  fullname: Wähnert, Dirk
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Matthew
  surname: Lawson-Smith
  fullname: Lawson-Smith, Matthew
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Markus
  surname: Windolf
  fullname: Windolf, Markus
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Karl
  surname: Stoffel
  fullname: Stoffel, Karl
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21577069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNo9UNtKAzEUDKLYi_6BSH5gay7N7sa3Kt6g0Jf6XLLJ2TaazZYka-n_-KFGvMCBcwZmzgwzQae-94DQFSUzSmR1c7daz0hDKAdOa0ZLzufiBI2p4LRgTNIRmsT4RgipCWPnaMSoqCpSyjH6XPjt4FTAManGOpuOeN8n8Mkq5_INobMp4hYOELDr9bv1Wxx1gEPEuu_2KoDBB5t2GfmPb13vlftnWp8nBdWBGVy2OWKvrMsSY7Ohw8k2VuE2KJ2GAPEWK9zYvgO9U97qTIhpMMcLdNYqF-Hyd0_R6-PD-v65WK6eXu4Xy0LzmoqireYcqlpIAMGgKZVoa0mgLHUlqZDSMKGaVps5q7Xkpq64UMyweaVN0xoj2BRd__zdD01OvNkH2-XMm7-62BfPQnO2
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_0954411916667968
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2474_14_110
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jot_2018_10_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mporth_2016_09_012
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_023_06312_1
crossref_primary_10_1302_2046_3758_61_BJR_2016_0261
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_013_2267_9
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_021_04234_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_021_04239_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10039_011_1806_0
crossref_primary_10_1093_jcde_qwaa053
crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000000693
crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_25134
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2015_09_035
crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000000697
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000008278
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiomech_2023_106095
crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_25730
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00113_014_2671_7
crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering10121397
crossref_primary_10_1515_bmt_2014_0100
crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_23798
crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000000739
crossref_primary_10_12671_jkfs_2018_31_3_94
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_023_03879_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_015_2296_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2023_08_008
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59071214
crossref_primary_10_1111_vsu_13124
crossref_primary_10_4137_CMTIM_S12264
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0300256
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_012_1494_9
crossref_primary_10_4055_cios23036
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_023_05710_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2022_06_036
crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_25406
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2474_14_66
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_014_2334_x
crossref_primary_10_3928_01477447_20150902_52
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_015_3007_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_011_1420_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_012_1633_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiomech_2023_106119
crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_M_01355
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2022_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00068_023_02333_6
crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000000195
crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_6649712
crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000001008
crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_25634
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2017_04_032
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0020_1383_15_30023_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mporth_2014_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2016_04_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2015_05_034
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59081379
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2021_11_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jot_2016_12_002
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13037_015_0086_1
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59040740
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12938_022_01006_6
ContentType Journal Article
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
DOI 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182163345
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod no_fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1531-2291
ExternalDocumentID 21577069
Genre Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
.-D
.3C
.GJ
.Z2
01R
0R~
1J1
40H
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
71W
77Y
7O~
8L-
AAAAV
AAAXR
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAMOA
AAQKA
AARTV
AASCR
AASOK
AAWTL
AAXQO
AAYEP
ABASU
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABVCZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ACCJW
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACILI
ACLDA
ACNWC
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXJB
ACXNZ
ADFPA
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADNKB
AE3
AE6
AEETU
AENEX
AFDTB
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHRYX
AHVBC
AIJEX
AINUH
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJNYG
AJZMW
AKULP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AOHHW
AWKKM
BOYCO
BQLVK
BS7
C45
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DIWNM
DU5
DUNZO
E.X
EBS
ECM
EEVPB
EIF
EJD
ERAAH
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
F5P
FCALG
FL-
FW0
GNXGY
GQDEL
H0~
HLJTE
HZ~
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
IPNFZ
JF9
JG8
JK3
JK8
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
N4W
N9A
NPM
N~7
N~B
N~M
O9-
OAG
OAH
OCUKA
ODA
OL1
OLG
OLH
OLU
OLV
OLW
OLY
OLZ
OPUJH
ORVUJ
OUVQU
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P-K
P2P
R2J
R58
RIG
RLZ
S4R
S4S
T8P
TEORI
TSPGW
V2I
VVN
W3M
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
XXN
XYM
YCJ
YFH
ZFV
ZGI
ZXP
ZZMQN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3815-f743e7859ee52eb6a5f890e66c791599d25abfcd428c93d8735a2d247cdbfdd52
IngestDate Tue Oct 15 23:43:24 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3815-f743e7859ee52eb6a5f890e66c791599d25abfcd428c93d8735a2d247cdbfdd52
PMID 21577069
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_21577069
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2011-June
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2011
  text: 2011-June
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of orthopaedic trauma
PublicationTitleAlternate J Orthop Trauma
PublicationYear 2011
SSID ssj0008022
Score 2.2848923
Snippet To compare mechanical stability of angle-stable locking construct with four screws with conventional five screw locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia...
SourceID pubmed
SourceType Index Database
StartPage 340
SubjectTerms Aged
Bone Nails
Cadaver
Elastic Modulus
Equipment Failure Analysis
Female
Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis Design
Tensile Strength
Tibial Fractures - physiopathology
Tibial Fractures - surgery
Treatment Outcome
Title Angular stability potentially permits fewer locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21577069
Volume 25
hasFullText
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELa2cOGCQLxfmgO3VcquE8cJtxYBFYdyYCt6q_yE1Zbsiiaqyu_hZ_FjmLHz6oMKuESrOBtFnk_jmfH3jRl7qfhMoVl1gpnXLMl0xhOdC5UoTLeEUA6X-MC22M_3DrIPh-JwMvk1Yi01td42P67UlfyPVfEe2pVUsv9g2f6leAN_o33xihbG61_ZeKf6ElikGOEFjuvZdLOuif6jjqloQTyX-mTqHRHhcdFahdoBhomnJ9dxz7snl0SCrIm8ZTFPJXZdpdCHWNrUqTu1ydSTzKr5Hql1ahrk_KQmjnLLvnnt5fiXNowwY6eNIjqoohkWiPcNFeqbJU4HoW99tlr3teBeZLQ7aNg-ma-ntPff0kMwnh3GPgcmQEa6nvA3dPGrcaVjPmJkbbvOO88TzuPxXp37jrrpFqZjX5zGPlCX1ojYe3j342IoAnOMStPY1nIEm823gBsMiqScxQNlrh-90Lm7G9piW7KgY0X2qZLURgkkce6knKV8ddXnhEbV8RUXkp4Q_CzusNut1WAnQvAum7jqHvvZwg96-MEIftDCDwL8oAUVRPhBBz8g-MEYfv2TywrOww8i_CDCDwL8oIffa1BwDnwQwHefHbx7u3izl7SHfiQGg0eReAxpnSxE6ZzgTudK-KKcuTw3ssTQu7RcKO2NxbTZlKktZCoUtzyTxmpvreAP2I1qXblHDCw3uSrNPMecPCtKqaUxthAqTb0UztvH7GGc1KNN7Oxy1E33kz-OPGW3Bmg-Yzc9uhL3HOPSWr8IBv4NQLeYUg
link.rule.ids 780
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Angular+stability+potentially+permits+fewer+locking+screws+compared+with+conventional+locking+in+intramedullary+nailed+distal+tibia+fractures%3A+a+biomechanical+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+orthopaedic+trauma&rft.au=Gueorguiev%2C+Boyko&rft.au=Ockert%2C+Ben&rft.au=Schwieger%2C+Karsten&rft.au=W%C3%A4hnert%2C+Dirk&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.eissn=1531-2291&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=340&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FBOT.0b013e3182163345&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F21577069&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F21577069&rft.externalDocID=21577069