Angular stability potentially permits fewer locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study
To compare mechanical stability of angle-stable locking construct with four screws with conventional five screw locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures under cyclic loading. Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae were intramedullary nailed and assigned to either an angle-st...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of orthopaedic trauma Vol. 25; no. 6; p. 340 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.06.2011
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To compare mechanical stability of angle-stable locking construct with four screws with conventional five screw locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures under cyclic loading.
Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae were intramedullary nailed and assigned to either an angle-stable locking construct consisting of four screws or conventional five-screw locking. After simulating an unstable distal two-fragmental 42-A3.1 fracture, the specimens were mechanically tested under quasistatic and cyclic sinusoidal axial and torsional loading.
Bending stiffness of the angle-stable and the conventional fixation was 644.3 N/° and 416.5 N/°, respectively (P = 0.075, power 0.434). Torsional stiffness of the angle-stable locking (1.91 Nm/°) was significantly higher compared with the conventional one (1.13 Nm/°; P = 0.001, power 0.981). Torsional play of the angle-stable fixation (0.08°) was significantly smaller compared with the conventional one (0.46°; P = 0.002, power 0.965). The angle-stable locking revealed significantly less torsional deformation in the fracture gap after one cycle (0.74°) than the conventional one (1.75°; P = 0.005, power 0.915) and also after 1000 cycles (angle-stable: 1.56°; conventional: 2.51°; P = 0.042, power 0.562). Modes of failure were fracture of the distal fragment, loosening of distal locking screws, nail breakage, and their combination, equally distributed between the groups (P = 0.325).
Both the angle-stable locking technique using four screws and conventional locking consisting of five screws showed high biomechanical properties. Hence, angle-stable locking reflects a potential to maintain fixation stability while reducing the number of locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed unstable distal tibia fractures. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To compare mechanical stability of angle-stable locking construct with four screws with conventional five screw locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures under cyclic loading.
Ten pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric tibiae were intramedullary nailed and assigned to either an angle-stable locking construct consisting of four screws or conventional five-screw locking. After simulating an unstable distal two-fragmental 42-A3.1 fracture, the specimens were mechanically tested under quasistatic and cyclic sinusoidal axial and torsional loading.
Bending stiffness of the angle-stable and the conventional fixation was 644.3 N/° and 416.5 N/°, respectively (P = 0.075, power 0.434). Torsional stiffness of the angle-stable locking (1.91 Nm/°) was significantly higher compared with the conventional one (1.13 Nm/°; P = 0.001, power 0.981). Torsional play of the angle-stable fixation (0.08°) was significantly smaller compared with the conventional one (0.46°; P = 0.002, power 0.965). The angle-stable locking revealed significantly less torsional deformation in the fracture gap after one cycle (0.74°) than the conventional one (1.75°; P = 0.005, power 0.915) and also after 1000 cycles (angle-stable: 1.56°; conventional: 2.51°; P = 0.042, power 0.562). Modes of failure were fracture of the distal fragment, loosening of distal locking screws, nail breakage, and their combination, equally distributed between the groups (P = 0.325).
Both the angle-stable locking technique using four screws and conventional locking consisting of five screws showed high biomechanical properties. Hence, angle-stable locking reflects a potential to maintain fixation stability while reducing the number of locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed unstable distal tibia fractures. |
Author | Windolf, Markus Wähnert, Dirk Lawson-Smith, Matthew Schwieger, Karsten Stoffel, Karl Ockert, Ben Gueorguiev, Boyko |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Boyko surname: Gueorguiev fullname: Gueorguiev, Boyko email: boyko.gueorguiev@aofoundation.org organization: AO Research Institute Davos, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland. boyko.gueorguiev@aofoundation.org – sequence: 2 givenname: Ben surname: Ockert fullname: Ockert, Ben – sequence: 3 givenname: Karsten surname: Schwieger fullname: Schwieger, Karsten – sequence: 4 givenname: Dirk surname: Wähnert fullname: Wähnert, Dirk – sequence: 5 givenname: Matthew surname: Lawson-Smith fullname: Lawson-Smith, Matthew – sequence: 6 givenname: Markus surname: Windolf fullname: Windolf, Markus – sequence: 7 givenname: Karl surname: Stoffel fullname: Stoffel, Karl |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21577069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNo9UNtKAzEUDKLYi_6BSH5gay7N7sa3Kt6g0Jf6XLLJ2TaazZYka-n_-KFGvMCBcwZmzgwzQae-94DQFSUzSmR1c7daz0hDKAdOa0ZLzufiBI2p4LRgTNIRmsT4RgipCWPnaMSoqCpSyjH6XPjt4FTAManGOpuOeN8n8Mkq5_INobMp4hYOELDr9bv1Wxx1gEPEuu_2KoDBB5t2GfmPb13vlftnWp8nBdWBGVy2OWKvrMsSY7Ohw8k2VuE2KJ2GAPEWK9zYvgO9U97qTIhpMMcLdNYqF-Hyd0_R6-PD-v65WK6eXu4Xy0LzmoqireYcqlpIAMGgKZVoa0mgLHUlqZDSMKGaVps5q7Xkpq64UMyweaVN0xoj2BRd__zdD01OvNkH2-XMm7-62BfPQnO2 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_0954411916667968 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2474_14_110 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jot_2018_10_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mporth_2016_09_012 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_023_06312_1 crossref_primary_10_1302_2046_3758_61_BJR_2016_0261 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_013_2267_9 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_021_04234_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_021_04239_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10039_011_1806_0 crossref_primary_10_1093_jcde_qwaa053 crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000000693 crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_25134 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2015_09_035 crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000000697 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000008278 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiomech_2023_106095 crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_25730 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00113_014_2671_7 crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering10121397 crossref_primary_10_1515_bmt_2014_0100 crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_23798 crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000000739 crossref_primary_10_12671_jkfs_2018_31_3_94 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13018_023_03879_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_015_2296_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jse_2023_08_008 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59071214 crossref_primary_10_1111_vsu_13124 crossref_primary_10_4137_CMTIM_S12264 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0300256 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_012_1494_9 crossref_primary_10_4055_cios23036 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_023_05710_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2022_06_036 crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_25406 crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2474_14_66 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_014_2334_x crossref_primary_10_3928_01477447_20150902_52 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_015_3007_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_011_1420_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00264_012_1633_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiomech_2023_106119 crossref_primary_10_2106_JBJS_M_01355 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2022_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00068_023_02333_6 crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000000195 crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_6649712 crossref_primary_10_1097_BOT_0000000000001008 crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_25634 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2017_04_032 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0020_1383_15_30023_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mporth_2014_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2016_04_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2015_05_034 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59081379 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_injury_2021_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jot_2016_12_002 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13037_015_0086_1 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59040740 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12938_022_01006_6 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM |
DOI | 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3182163345 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | no_fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1531-2291 |
ExternalDocumentID | 21577069 |
Genre | Evaluation Studies Journal Article Comparative Study |
GroupedDBID | --- .-D .3C .GJ .Z2 01R 0R~ 1J1 40H 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 71W 77Y 7O~ 8L- AAAAV AAAXR AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAMOA AAQKA AARTV AASCR AASOK AAWTL AAXQO AAYEP ABASU ABBUW ABDIG ABJNI ABVCZ ABXVJ ABZAD ACCJW ACDDN ACEWG ACGFO ACGFS ACILI ACLDA ACNWC ACWDW ACWRI ACXJB ACXNZ ADFPA ADGGA ADHPY ADNKB AE3 AE6 AEETU AENEX AFDTB AFUWQ AGINI AHOMT AHQNM AHRYX AHVBC AIJEX AINUH AJIOK AJNWD AJNYG AJZMW AKULP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AOHHW AWKKM BOYCO BQLVK BS7 C45 CGR CS3 CUY CVF DIWNM DU5 DUNZO E.X EBS ECM EEVPB EIF EJD ERAAH EX3 F2K F2L F2M F2N F5P FCALG FL- FW0 GNXGY GQDEL H0~ HLJTE HZ~ IKREB IKYAY IN~ IPNFZ JF9 JG8 JK3 JK8 K8S KD2 KMI L-C N4W N9A NPM N~7 N~B N~M O9- OAG OAH OCUKA ODA OL1 OLG OLH OLU OLV OLW OLY OLZ OPUJH ORVUJ OUVQU OVD OVDNE OVIDH OVLEI OWU OWV OWW OWX OWY OWZ OXXIT P-K P2P R2J R58 RIG RLZ S4R S4S T8P TEORI TSPGW V2I VVN W3M WOQ WOW X3V X3W XXN XYM YCJ YFH ZFV ZGI ZXP ZZMQN |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3815-f743e7859ee52eb6a5f890e66c791599d25abfcd428c93d8735a2d247cdbfdd52 |
IngestDate | Tue Oct 15 23:43:24 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3815-f743e7859ee52eb6a5f890e66c791599d25abfcd428c93d8735a2d247cdbfdd52 |
PMID | 21577069 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_21577069 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2011-June |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2011 text: 2011-June |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of orthopaedic trauma |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Orthop Trauma |
PublicationYear | 2011 |
SSID | ssj0008022 |
Score | 2.2848923 |
Snippet | To compare mechanical stability of angle-stable locking construct with four screws with conventional five screw locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia... |
SourceID | pubmed |
SourceType | Index Database |
StartPage | 340 |
SubjectTerms | Aged Bone Nails Cadaver Elastic Modulus Equipment Failure Analysis Female Fracture Fixation, Internal - instrumentation Humans Male Middle Aged Prosthesis Design Tensile Strength Tibial Fractures - physiopathology Tibial Fractures - surgery Treatment Outcome |
Title | Angular stability potentially permits fewer locking screws compared with conventional locking in intramedullary nailed distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21577069 |
Volume | 25 |
hasFullText | |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELa2cOGCQLxfmgO3VcquE8cJtxYBFYdyYCt6q_yE1Zbsiiaqyu_hZ_FjmLHz6oMKuESrOBtFnk_jmfH3jRl7qfhMoVl1gpnXLMl0xhOdC5UoTLeEUA6X-MC22M_3DrIPh-JwMvk1Yi01td42P67UlfyPVfEe2pVUsv9g2f6leAN_o33xihbG61_ZeKf6ElikGOEFjuvZdLOuif6jjqloQTyX-mTqHRHhcdFahdoBhomnJ9dxz7snl0SCrIm8ZTFPJXZdpdCHWNrUqTu1ydSTzKr5Hql1ahrk_KQmjnLLvnnt5fiXNowwY6eNIjqoohkWiPcNFeqbJU4HoW99tlr3teBeZLQ7aNg-ma-ntPff0kMwnh3GPgcmQEa6nvA3dPGrcaVjPmJkbbvOO88TzuPxXp37jrrpFqZjX5zGPlCX1ojYe3j342IoAnOMStPY1nIEm823gBsMiqScxQNlrh-90Lm7G9piW7KgY0X2qZLURgkkce6knKV8ddXnhEbV8RUXkp4Q_CzusNut1WAnQvAum7jqHvvZwg96-MEIftDCDwL8oAUVRPhBBz8g-MEYfv2TywrOww8i_CDCDwL8oIffa1BwDnwQwHefHbx7u3izl7SHfiQGg0eReAxpnSxE6ZzgTudK-KKcuTw3ssTQu7RcKO2NxbTZlKktZCoUtzyTxmpvreAP2I1qXblHDCw3uSrNPMecPCtKqaUxthAqTb0UztvH7GGc1KNN7Oxy1E33kz-OPGW3Bmg-Yzc9uhL3HOPSWr8IBv4NQLeYUg |
link.rule.ids | 780 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Angular+stability+potentially+permits+fewer+locking+screws+compared+with+conventional+locking+in+intramedullary+nailed+distal+tibia+fractures%3A+a+biomechanical+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+orthopaedic+trauma&rft.au=Gueorguiev%2C+Boyko&rft.au=Ockert%2C+Ben&rft.au=Schwieger%2C+Karsten&rft.au=W%C3%A4hnert%2C+Dirk&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.eissn=1531-2291&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=340&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FBOT.0b013e3182163345&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F21577069&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F21577069&rft.externalDocID=21577069 |