The Effect of Manipulation of the Programmed Intermittent Bolus Time Interval and Injection Volume on Total Drug Use for Labor Epidural Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Programmed intermittent bolus administration of epidural anesthetic solution compared with continuous infusion results in decreased anesthetic consumption and increased patient satisfaction. In this randomized and blinded study, we evaluated bupivacaine consumption and other analgesic outcomes when...
Saved in:
Published in | Anesthesia and analgesia Vol. 112; no. 4; pp. 904 - 911 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hagerstown, MD
International Anesthesia Research Society
01.04.2011
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0003-2999 1526-7598 1526-7598 |
DOI | 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820e7c2f |
Cover
Abstract | Programmed intermittent bolus administration of epidural anesthetic solution compared with continuous infusion results in decreased anesthetic consumption and increased patient satisfaction. In this randomized and blinded study, we evaluated bupivacaine consumption and other analgesic outcomes when the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and volume were manipulated during the maintenance of epidural labor analgesia.
Healthy, term, nulliparous women in spontaneous labor had combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia initiated with intrathecal bupivacaine 1.25 mg and fentanyl 15 μg, followed by an epidural test dose (lidocaine 45 mg with epinephrine 15 μg). Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 programmed intermittent bolus dose regimens for maintenance of analgesia: 2.5 mL every 15 minutes (2.5/15), 5 mL every 30 minutes (5/30), or 10 mL every 60 minutes (10/60). The maintenance epidural solution consisted of bupivacaine 0.625 mg/mL with fentanyl 1.95 μg/mL. Breakthrough pain was treated initially with patient-administered epidural bolus doses, followed by manual boluses administered by the anesthesiologist if necessary. The primary outcome was total bupivacaine consumption per hour of labor. A linear mixed-effects model was used to model each patient's overall bupivacaine consumption per hour; the fixed effect was basal bupivacaine administration rate and the random effect was the area under the pain score versus time curve.
One hundred ninety women were studied. The median (interquartile range) adjusted bupivacaine consumption per hour of labor was 8.8 mg (8.0-9.7 mg) in group 10/60 compared with 10.0 mg (9.3-10.8 mg) in group 5/30 and 10.4 mg (9.6-11.2 mg) in group 2.5/15 (P = 0.005). There were no differences in area under the pain score versus time curve, pain scores at delivery, patient-controlled epidural analgesia requests or administrations, number of manual bolus doses for breakthrough pain, time to first patient-controlled epidural analgesia or manual bolus dose, or patient satisfaction with labor analgesia.
Extending the programmed intermittent bolus interval and volume from 15 minutes to 60 minutes, and 2.5 mL to 10 mL, respectively, decreased bupivacaine consumption without decreasing patient comfort or satisfaction. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Programmed intermittent bolus administration of epidural anesthetic solution compared with continuous infusion results in decreased anesthetic consumption and increased patient satisfaction. In this randomized and blinded study, we evaluated bupivacaine consumption and other analgesic outcomes when the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and volume were manipulated during the maintenance of epidural labor analgesia.BACKGROUNDProgrammed intermittent bolus administration of epidural anesthetic solution compared with continuous infusion results in decreased anesthetic consumption and increased patient satisfaction. In this randomized and blinded study, we evaluated bupivacaine consumption and other analgesic outcomes when the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and volume were manipulated during the maintenance of epidural labor analgesia.Healthy, term, nulliparous women in spontaneous labor had combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia initiated with intrathecal bupivacaine 1.25 mg and fentanyl 15 μg, followed by an epidural test dose (lidocaine 45 mg with epinephrine 15 μg). Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 programmed intermittent bolus dose regimens for maintenance of analgesia: 2.5 mL every 15 minutes (2.5/15), 5 mL every 30 minutes (5/30), or 10 mL every 60 minutes (10/60). The maintenance epidural solution consisted of bupivacaine 0.625 mg/mL with fentanyl 1.95 μg/mL. Breakthrough pain was treated initially with patient-administered epidural bolus doses, followed by manual boluses administered by the anesthesiologist if necessary. The primary outcome was total bupivacaine consumption per hour of labor. A linear mixed-effects model was used to model each patient's overall bupivacaine consumption per hour; the fixed effect was basal bupivacaine administration rate and the random effect was the area under the pain score versus time curve.METHODSHealthy, term, nulliparous women in spontaneous labor had combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia initiated with intrathecal bupivacaine 1.25 mg and fentanyl 15 μg, followed by an epidural test dose (lidocaine 45 mg with epinephrine 15 μg). Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 programmed intermittent bolus dose regimens for maintenance of analgesia: 2.5 mL every 15 minutes (2.5/15), 5 mL every 30 minutes (5/30), or 10 mL every 60 minutes (10/60). The maintenance epidural solution consisted of bupivacaine 0.625 mg/mL with fentanyl 1.95 μg/mL. Breakthrough pain was treated initially with patient-administered epidural bolus doses, followed by manual boluses administered by the anesthesiologist if necessary. The primary outcome was total bupivacaine consumption per hour of labor. A linear mixed-effects model was used to model each patient's overall bupivacaine consumption per hour; the fixed effect was basal bupivacaine administration rate and the random effect was the area under the pain score versus time curve.One hundred ninety women were studied. The median (interquartile range) adjusted bupivacaine consumption per hour of labor was 8.8 mg (8.0-9.7 mg) in group 10/60 compared with 10.0 mg (9.3-10.8 mg) in group 5/30 and 10.4 mg (9.6-11.2 mg) in group 2.5/15 (P = 0.005). There were no differences in area under the pain score versus time curve, pain scores at delivery, patient-controlled epidural analgesia requests or administrations, number of manual bolus doses for breakthrough pain, time to first patient-controlled epidural analgesia or manual bolus dose, or patient satisfaction with labor analgesia.RESULTSOne hundred ninety women were studied. The median (interquartile range) adjusted bupivacaine consumption per hour of labor was 8.8 mg (8.0-9.7 mg) in group 10/60 compared with 10.0 mg (9.3-10.8 mg) in group 5/30 and 10.4 mg (9.6-11.2 mg) in group 2.5/15 (P = 0.005). There were no differences in area under the pain score versus time curve, pain scores at delivery, patient-controlled epidural analgesia requests or administrations, number of manual bolus doses for breakthrough pain, time to first patient-controlled epidural analgesia or manual bolus dose, or patient satisfaction with labor analgesia.Extending the programmed intermittent bolus interval and volume from 15 minutes to 60 minutes, and 2.5 mL to 10 mL, respectively, decreased bupivacaine consumption without decreasing patient comfort or satisfaction.CONCLUSIONSExtending the programmed intermittent bolus interval and volume from 15 minutes to 60 minutes, and 2.5 mL to 10 mL, respectively, decreased bupivacaine consumption without decreasing patient comfort or satisfaction. Programmed intermittent bolus administration of epidural anesthetic solution compared with continuous infusion results in decreased anesthetic consumption and increased patient satisfaction. In this randomized and blinded study, we evaluated bupivacaine consumption and other analgesic outcomes when the programmed intermittent bolus time interval and volume were manipulated during the maintenance of epidural labor analgesia. Healthy, term, nulliparous women in spontaneous labor had combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia initiated with intrathecal bupivacaine 1.25 mg and fentanyl 15 μg, followed by an epidural test dose (lidocaine 45 mg with epinephrine 15 μg). Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 programmed intermittent bolus dose regimens for maintenance of analgesia: 2.5 mL every 15 minutes (2.5/15), 5 mL every 30 minutes (5/30), or 10 mL every 60 minutes (10/60). The maintenance epidural solution consisted of bupivacaine 0.625 mg/mL with fentanyl 1.95 μg/mL. Breakthrough pain was treated initially with patient-administered epidural bolus doses, followed by manual boluses administered by the anesthesiologist if necessary. The primary outcome was total bupivacaine consumption per hour of labor. A linear mixed-effects model was used to model each patient's overall bupivacaine consumption per hour; the fixed effect was basal bupivacaine administration rate and the random effect was the area under the pain score versus time curve. One hundred ninety women were studied. The median (interquartile range) adjusted bupivacaine consumption per hour of labor was 8.8 mg (8.0-9.7 mg) in group 10/60 compared with 10.0 mg (9.3-10.8 mg) in group 5/30 and 10.4 mg (9.6-11.2 mg) in group 2.5/15 (P = 0.005). There were no differences in area under the pain score versus time curve, pain scores at delivery, patient-controlled epidural analgesia requests or administrations, number of manual bolus doses for breakthrough pain, time to first patient-controlled epidural analgesia or manual bolus dose, or patient satisfaction with labor analgesia. Extending the programmed intermittent bolus interval and volume from 15 minutes to 60 minutes, and 2.5 mL to 10 mL, respectively, decreased bupivacaine consumption without decreasing patient comfort or satisfaction. |
Author | Hewlett, Bradley McCarthy, Robert J. Wong, Cynthia A. |
AuthorAffiliation | From the Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: From the Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Cynthia surname: Wong middlename: A. fullname: Wong, Cynthia A. organization: From the Department of Anesthesiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois – sequence: 2 givenname: Robert surname: McCarthy middlename: J. fullname: McCarthy, Robert J. – sequence: 3 givenname: Bradley surname: Hewlett fullname: Hewlett, Bradley |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24029769$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21430035$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkdtuEzEQhleoiKaFN0DIN4irLT7uenuXhgCVwkEo5Xbl3YwTF68dbC8VPBWPiJcEkHqDJdsz_r-ZkfyfFSfOOyiKpwRfEErYy_n75QXuMGHAiKQY6p7qB8WMCFqVtWjkSTHDGLOSNk1zWpzFeJtTgmX1qDilhLOsiVnxc70DtNQa-oS8Ru-UM_vRqmS8m_KU1Y_Bb4MaBtiga5cgDCYlcAldeTtGtDYDHN6_KYuUm6Db3G1q8DkTWc3R2qesvgrjFt1EQNoHtFJdPpd7sxlD1uZO2S1Eoy7RHH3KffxgfuSRC-9S8NbmcB2Mso-Lh1rZCE-O93lx83q5XrwtVx_eXC_mq7JnkrCyazpQWtNOAOuk4FjXmAPlAvdcV5izqpGNFLSuJeZKVjXBoKATTSdEv6lqdl68OPTdB_91hJjawcQerFUO_BhbKWRdVxyzTD47kmOXP6ndBzOo8L3988kZeH4EVOyV1UG53sR_HMe0qasmc_zA9cHHGED_RQhuJ8_b7Hl73_NcdnmvrDfpt4MpKGP_V3yceedt9jB-seMdhHYHyqZdi6clWFNSTAjmOSnzpoz9AlECwv8 |
CODEN | AACRAT |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000003650 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_6576_2011_02621_x crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_16060 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2015_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_39248_5 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000005633 crossref_primary_10_2217_pmt_2017_0010 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00101_013_2235_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12630_019_01407_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2020_05_060 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2014_06_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2023_111364 crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000002089 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjane_2014_12_006 crossref_primary_10_1080_03007995_2016_1181619 crossref_primary_10_4097_kja_19156 crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_14159 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tacc_2016_05_006 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0375_9393_19_13470_0 crossref_primary_10_4236_ojanes_2013_34049 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0b013e3182713b26 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm13040600 crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000004347 crossref_primary_10_2147_DDDT_S491054 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00540_023_03253_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2022_03_001 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000028742 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_oxy_2013_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1280_4703_20_44233_1 crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0b013e328360b069 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gofs_2020_09_015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2014_07_001 crossref_primary_10_1097_01_aoa_0000552922_89189_c9 crossref_primary_10_1097_ACO_0000000000000183 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0b013e3182367a94 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2012_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1515_jpm_2016_0118 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yane_2011_09_006 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000040327 crossref_primary_10_1007_s44179_021_0030_0 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000006813 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2015_09_021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2015_09_022 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000001407 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_0771_20_44220_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_aas_13689 crossref_primary_10_1080_03007995_2017_1377166 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bja_2019_02_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclinane_2020_109850 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_024_02678_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bjan_2015_10_003 crossref_primary_10_23736_S0375_9393_20_14516_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12630_021_01922_6 crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000002182 crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_15149 crossref_primary_10_1136_rapm_2020_101873 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0000000000001655 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anrea_2016_06_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpa_2017_01_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2022_103571 crossref_primary_10_1111_aas_14542 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pratan_2017_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12630_021_02132_w crossref_primary_10_1097_01_ASM_0001072480_66324_5c crossref_primary_10_1080_01443615_2018_1469604 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11091350 crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina59091579 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tacc_2012_01_008 crossref_primary_10_1155_2018_6297247 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00540_021_03002_x crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0b013e31822827b8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anclin_2016_09_003 crossref_primary_10_1097_AJP_0000000000000106 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00482_017_0257_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40140_013_0030_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_019_05354_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s10354_017_0584_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_midw_2023_103730 crossref_primary_10_12688_f1000research_11130_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijoa_2013_07_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arth_2017_11_018 |
Cites_doi | 10.1177/0310057X1003800514 10.1213/01.ANE.0000081793.60059.10 10.1093/bja/ael157 10.1213/01.ane.0000253236.89376.60 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00019 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f1fc2 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181951a7f 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.05.004 10.1093/bja/59.3.338 10.1213/01.ane.0000197778.57615.1a 10.1007/BF03018402 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.07.006 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | International Anesthesia Research Society 2015 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: International Anesthesia Research Society – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820e7c2f |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1526-7598 |
EndPage | 911 |
ExternalDocumentID | 21430035 24029769 10_1213_ANE_0b013e31820e7c2f 00000539-201104000-00023 |
Genre | Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .-D .55 .XZ .Z2 01R 026 0R~ 1J1 23M 2WC 40H 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 5GY 5RE 5VS 71W 77Y 7O~ AAAAV AAAXR AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAJCS AAMOA AAMTA AARTV AASOK AAUEB AAWTL AAXQO ABBUW ABDIG ABJNI ABOCM ABPPZ ABPXF ABXVJ ABZAD ACCJW ACDDN ACDOF ACEWG ACGFO ACGFS ACILI ACWDW ACWRI ACXNZ ACZKN ADBBV ADGGA ADHPY ADNKB AE6 AEETU AENEX AFDTB AFEXH AFMFG AFNMH AFUWQ AGINI AHOMT AHQNM AHVBC AHXIK AIJEX AINUH AJCLO AJIOK AJNWD AJNYG AJZMW ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMJPA AMNEI BAWUL BOYCO BQLVK C1A C45 CS3 DIWNM DUNZO E.X E3Z EBS EX3 F2K F2L F2M F2N F5P FCALG FL- FRP FW0 GX1 H0~ HZ~ IKREB IKYAY IN~ JF9 JG8 JK3 JK8 K8S KD2 KMI L-C L7B M18 MZP N9A N~7 N~B O9- OAG OAH OB4 ODMTH OHYEH OK1 OL1 OLG OLH OLL OLU OLV OLY OLZ OPUJH OUVQU OVD OVDNE OVIDH OVLEI OVOZU OWBYB OWU OWV OWW OWX OWY OWZ OXXIT P2P PONUX RLZ S4R S4S TEORI TR2 V2I VVN W3M W8F WOQ WOW X3V X3W X7M XXN XYM YFH YOC ZFV ZZMQN .GJ 1CY 3O- 53G AAFWJ AAQKA AAQQT AASCR AAYXX ABASU ABKPX ABVCZ ABXYN ABZZY ACLDA ACLED ACXJB ADFPA ADSXY AE3 AEBDS AFBFQ AFFNX AFMBP AFSOK AHQVU AHRYX AJRGT AKCTQ AKULP ALMTX AMKUR AOHHW AOQMC BS7 CITATION EEVPB EJD ERAAH GNXGY GQDEL HLJTE IPNFZ J5H N4W N~M OCUKA ODA ORVUJ P-K R58 RIG TSPGW YQJ ZGI ZXP IQODW ACIJW AWKKM CGR CUY CVF DIK ECM EIF NPM OJAPA OLW PKN 7X8 ADKSD |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3813-b9beaff2b5e3b8540f704e2450c4f6043698985277804a86710eaeb59b55cd673 |
ISSN | 0003-2999 1526-7598 |
IngestDate | Mon Sep 08 05:37:55 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:53:40 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:13:11 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 12 04:00:14 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:18 EDT 2025 Fri May 16 03:49:26 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Extradural Analgesia Anesthesia Time interval Bolus injection Intermittent |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3813-b9beaff2b5e3b8540f704e2450c4f6043698985277804a86710eaeb59b55cd673 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
PMID | 21430035 |
PQID | 858776403 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_858776403 pubmed_primary_21430035 pascalfrancis_primary_24029769 crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0b013e31820e7c2f crossref_citationtrail_10_1213_ANE_0b013e31820e7c2f wolterskluwer_health_00000539-201104000-00023 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2011-April-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2011 text: 2011-April-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Hagerstown, MD |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hagerstown, MD – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Anesthesia and analgesia |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Anesth Analg |
PublicationYear | 2011 |
Publisher | International Anesthesia Research Society Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
Publisher_xml | – name: International Anesthesia Research Society – name: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
References | Hogan (R9-23-20210902) 2002; 27 Ginosar (R13-23-20210902) 2003; 97 Fegley (R14-23-20210902) 2008; 107 Norris (R10-23-20210902) 1987; 59 Halpern (R8-23-20210902) 2009; 108 Sia (R4-23-20210902) 2007; 104 Ueda (R11-23-20210902) 2005; 103 Lim (R7-23-20210902) 2010; 38 Fettes (R3-23-20210902) 2006; 97 Leo (R6-23-20210902) 2010; 19 Wong (R1-23-20210902) 2006; 102 Chua (R2-23-20210902) 2004; 51 Mardirosoff (R12-23-20210902) 1998; 23 Lim (R5-23-20210902) 2005; 14 |
References_xml | – volume: 23 start-page: 92 year: 1998 ident: R12-23-20210902 article-title: Sensory block extension during combined spinal and epidural. publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med – volume: 38 start-page: 894 year: 2010 ident: R7-23-20210902 article-title: Comparison of automated intermittent low volume bolus with continuous infusion for labour epidural analgesia. publication-title: Anaesth Intensive Care doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800514 – volume: 97 start-page: 1428 year: 2003 ident: R13-23-20210902 article-title: The site of action of epidural fentanyl in humans: the difference between infusion and bolus administration. publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000081793.60059.10 – volume: 97 start-page: 359 year: 2006 ident: R3-23-20210902 article-title: Intermittent vs continuous administration of epidural ropivacaine with fentanyl for analgesia during labour. publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/ael157 – volume: 104 start-page: 673 year: 2007 ident: R4-23-20210902 article-title: A comparison of a basal infusion with automated mandatory boluses in parturient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor. publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000253236.89376.60 – volume: 103 start-page: 126 year: 2005 ident: R11-23-20210902 article-title: A comparative study of sequential epidural bolus technique and continuous epidural infusion. publication-title: Anesthesiology doi: 10.1097/00000542-200507000-00019 – volume: 107 start-page: 1079 year: 2008 ident: R14-23-20210902 article-title: Epidural multiorifice catheters function as single-orifice catheters: an in vitro study. publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f1fc2 – volume: 27 start-page: 150 year: 2002 ident: R9-23-20210902 article-title: Distribution of solution in the epidural space: examination by cryomicrotome section. publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med – volume: 108 start-page: 921 year: 2009 ident: R8-23-20210902 article-title: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor. publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181951a7f – volume: 14 start-page: 305 year: 2005 ident: R5-23-20210902 article-title: Automated regular boluses for epidural analgesia: a comparison with continuous infusion. publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.05.004 – volume: 59 start-page: 338 year: 1987 ident: R10-23-20210902 article-title: Effect of gravity on the spread of extradural anaesthesia for caesarean section. publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/59.3.338 – volume: 102 start-page: 904 year: 2006 ident: R1-23-20210902 article-title: A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia. publication-title: Anesth Analg doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000197778.57615.1a – volume: 51 start-page: 581 year: 2004 ident: R2-23-20210902 article-title: Automated intermittent epidural boluses improve analgesia induced by intrathecal fentanyl during labour. publication-title: Can J Anaesth doi: 10.1007/BF03018402 – volume: 19 start-page: 357 year: 2010 ident: R6-23-20210902 article-title: A randomized comparison of automated intermittent mandatory boluses with a basal infusion in combination with patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.07.006 |
SSID | ssj0001086 |
Score | 2.3279822 |
Snippet | Programmed intermittent bolus administration of epidural anesthetic solution compared with continuous infusion results in decreased anesthetic consumption and... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref wolterskluwer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 904 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Analgesia, Epidural - instrumentation Analgesia, Epidural - methods Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage Biological and medical sciences Female Humans Injections, Epidural Labor, Obstetric - drug effects Labor, Obstetric - physiology Medical sciences Pain Measurement - drug effects Pain Measurement - methods Pregnancy Time Factors |
Title | The Effect of Manipulation of the Programmed Intermittent Bolus Time Interval and Injection Volume on Total Drug Use for Labor Epidural Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
URI | https://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00000539-201104000-00023 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21430035 https://www.proquest.com/docview/858776403 |
Volume | 112 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnZ1Lb9NAEIBXoVyQEALxCo9qDtwqg2OvX9xCCATUFoQSKCfLa69bQ2pHtQOiv4r_w59hZtevlEgFDokca22vMp93Z3dejD1BjThGRUIarvAcg7uj1Ih8wQ1JyctQoxvZyqvy4NCdLfjbI-doMPjV81paV-JpfL41ruR_pIrnUK4UJfsPkm1viifwGOWL3yhh_P5rGdfph7UnS9ZU42pM_--1-xVOeXrv7zSrKrL-v8B-lSr-Q5__VqcMeJN_kbp4-Ec1bJEtYV5QwOTLs_Xx3qLUOcL3CZ296SpLVNYOymxyLMss0nHuH_BOxWl2TpvH2hN-iYdz-kP6uvAYR1nsY6nDwvBT36SdJ97peKrJj7w6wUYtaweTCarhs8-dZ3hn3JpNP-1P53ONbZQ0Zuuk26jlG_saW_JTqH2NbEnOQxtjOlWj02WW2jF9ZPXg5b0ROtDVjuvJPtAj_R_zCDJK-SwOp91GsWVKL7bSbt5sfAUuTKetkyPZrVDZC66wq5bnKR-C10ed_xGVuGrKOVL367hOfPKzbc_d0Juur6ISX-FU117ZtjjCNt8L8rcov6pwi57SNL_JbtSrHRhrdG-xgcxvs5-ILWhsoUihjy39RiSgwxb62ILCFghbaLAFZAdabEFjC3iksAXCFhBbQGxBYQsNttBi-xzG0EELHbSgoL3DFq-m88nMqAuHGDEqoLYhAiGjNLWEI23h45ok9UwuLe6YMU9dKrpAVVMdlIpv8ogyPJoyksIJhOPEievZd9lOXuTyPgOObeKArM3JiOMST8SuzxOJal8kgpEwh8xuxBLGdVZ9Ku6yDGl1jcIMUZjhRWEOmdFetdJZZS5pv7sh8faihrEhgwaBEOcHMvpFuSzWZeg7vue53LSH7J5Go7sY10rkSYC92WAl1CHYodpAcOzAUIsEXuegsOwHl_XmIbvWvdGP2E51tpaPUXevxK56B34DkoHvBA |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Effect+of+Manipulation+of+the+Programmed+Intermittent+Bolus+Time+Interval+and+Injection+Volume+on+Total+Drug+Use+for+Labor+Epidural+Analgesia%3A+A+Randomized+Controlled+Trial&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia+and+analgesia&rft.au=WONG%2C+Cynthia+A&rft.au=MCCARTHY%2C+Robert+J&rft.au=HEWLETT%2C+Bradley&rft.date=2011-04-01&rft.pub=Lippincott+Williams+%26+Wilkins&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.volume=112&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=904&rft.epage=911&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213%2FANE.0b013e31820e7c2f&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=24029769 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0003-2999&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0003-2999&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0003-2999&client=summon |