A nearly optimal inspection policy for a two-component series system
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual deterioration and whose failures are not self-announcing and can be detected only through inspection. Design/methodology/approach – The problem...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of quality in maintenance engineering Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 171 - 185 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bradford
Emerald Group Publishing Limited
11.05.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual deterioration and whose failures are not self-announcing and can be detected only through inspection.
Design/methodology/approach
– The problem is tackled in the context of condition-based maintenance (CBM) with a maintenance model in the class of the control-limit policies for which the maintenance decision is made following inspection by comparison of the deterioration level to critical thresholds. A mathematical model is developed to express the total expected cost per time unit as a function of the inspection instants.
Findings
– For any given series system composed of two components with known critical deterioration threshold levels, and for any given set of costs related to inspection, inactivity due to failure, and preventive and corrective replacements of each component, a nearly optimal inspection sequence of the system is derived such as the total expected cost is reduced.
Research limitations/implications
– Due to the complexity of the cost model with the inspection instants (×1, ×2, ×3, …) being the decision variables, it has not been possible to derive the optimal solution. A quasi-optimal sequence of inspection times is derived along with the corresponding total average cost per time unit.
Practical implications
– In many practical situations in which CBM is implemented, a tradeoff between inspection costs and inactivity and replacement costs has to be balanced when determining the intervals between successive inspections at which the degradation level of the components should be assessed and compared to predetermined critical threshold levels. Inspecting too often would increase inspection costs but in the same time it would also increase the probability to avoid a failure and end up with a preventive replacement, whereas not inspecting often enough would increase the probability to end up with a failure increasing replacement and inactivity costs.
Originality/value
– While the inspection problem has been largely treated for single component systems, inspection policies become much more complex when considering multi-component systems. A two-component series system is considered in this paper. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual deterioration and whose failures are not self-announcing and can be detected only through inspection.
Design/methodology/approach
– The problem is tackled in the context of condition-based maintenance (CBM) with a maintenance model in the class of the control-limit policies for which the maintenance decision is made following inspection by comparison of the deterioration level to critical thresholds. A mathematical model is developed to express the total expected cost per time unit as a function of the inspection instants.
Findings
– For any given series system composed of two components with known critical deterioration threshold levels, and for any given set of costs related to inspection, inactivity due to failure, and preventive and corrective replacements of each component, a nearly optimal inspection sequence of the system is derived such as the total expected cost is reduced.
Research limitations/implications
– Due to the complexity of the cost model with the inspection instants (×1, ×2, ×3, …) being the decision variables, it has not been possible to derive the optimal solution. A quasi-optimal sequence of inspection times is derived along with the corresponding total average cost per time unit.
Practical implications
– In many practical situations in which CBM is implemented, a tradeoff between inspection costs and inactivity and replacement costs has to be balanced when determining the intervals between successive inspections at which the degradation level of the components should be assessed and compared to predetermined critical threshold levels. Inspecting too often would increase inspection costs but in the same time it would also increase the probability to avoid a failure and end up with a preventive replacement, whereas not inspecting often enough would increase the probability to end up with a failure increasing replacement and inactivity costs.
Originality/value
– While the inspection problem has been largely treated for single component systems, inspection policies become much more complex when considering multi-component systems. A two-component series system is considered in this paper. Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual deterioration and whose failures are not self-announcing and can be detected only through inspection. Design/methodology/approach - The problem is tackled in the context of condition-based maintenance (CBM) with a maintenance model in the class of the control-limit policies for which the maintenance decision is made following inspection by comparison of the deterioration level to critical thresholds. A mathematical model is developed to express the total expected cost per time unit as a function of the inspection instants. Findings - For any given series system composed of two components with known critical deterioration threshold levels, and for any given set of costs related to inspection, inactivity due to failure, and preventive and corrective replacements of each component, a nearly optimal inspection sequence of the system is derived such as the total expected cost is reduced. Research limitations/implications - Due to the complexity of the cost model with the inspection instants (1, 2, 3,...) being the decision variables, it has not been possible to derive the optimal solution. A quasi-optimal sequence of inspection times is derived along with the corresponding total average cost per time unit. Practical implications - In many practical situations in which CBM is implemented, a tradeoff between inspection costs and inactivity and replacement costs has to be balanced when determining the intervals between successive inspections at which the degradation level of the components should be assessed and compared to predetermined critical threshold levels. Inspecting too often would increase inspection costs but in the same time it would also increase the probability to avoid a failure and end up with a preventive replacement, whereas not inspecting often enough would increase the probability to end up with a failure increasing replacement and inactivity costs. Originality/value - While the inspection problem has been largely treated for single component systems, inspection policies become much more complex when considering multi-component systems. A two-component series system is considered in this paper. Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual deterioration and whose failures are not self-announcing and can be detected only through inspection. Design/methodology/approach – The problem is tackled in the context of condition-based maintenance (CBM) with a maintenance model in the class of the control-limit policies for which the maintenance decision is made following inspection by comparison of the deterioration level to critical thresholds. A mathematical model is developed to express the total expected cost per time unit as a function of the inspection instants. Findings – For any given series system composed of two components with known critical deterioration threshold levels, and for any given set of costs related to inspection, inactivity due to failure, and preventive and corrective replacements of each component, a nearly optimal inspection sequence of the system is derived such as the total expected cost is reduced. Research limitations/implications – Due to the complexity of the cost model with the inspection instants (×1, ×2, ×3, …) being the decision variables, it has not been possible to derive the optimal solution. A quasi-optimal sequence of inspection times is derived along with the corresponding total average cost per time unit. Practical implications – In many practical situations in which CBM is implemented, a tradeoff between inspection costs and inactivity and replacement costs has to be balanced when determining the intervals between successive inspections at which the degradation level of the components should be assessed and compared to predetermined critical threshold levels. Inspecting too often would increase inspection costs but in the same time it would also increase the probability to avoid a failure and end up with a preventive replacement, whereas not inspecting often enough would increase the probability to end up with a failure increasing replacement and inactivity costs. Originality/value – While the inspection problem has been largely treated for single component systems, inspection policies become much more complex when considering multi-component systems. A two-component series system is considered in this paper. |
Author | Rezg, Nidhal Chelbi, Anis Daoud, Ait-Kadi Maaroufi, Ghofrane |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ghofrane surname: Maaroufi fullname: Maaroufi, Ghofrane organization: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia – sequence: 2 givenname: Anis surname: Chelbi fullname: Chelbi, Anis organization: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia – sequence: 3 givenname: Nidhal surname: Rezg fullname: Rezg, Nidhal organization: College of Mathematics, Information, Mechanics and Automatics, University of Lorraine, Metz, France – sequence: 4 givenname: Ait-Kadi surname: Daoud fullname: Daoud, Ait-Kadi organization: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laval University, Québec City, Canada |
BookMark | eNqNkU9P3DAQxS0EErD0A_RmqZdeXGbseO0cEaUtCISQ6NkyzkTKKolT26tqvz2JlktXqOI0c3hv_rzfOTse40iMfUb4hgj28u7p4UYgCgmoBICpjtgZGm2FsUoez73SWkiNeMrOc94AgKoNnLHvV3wkn_odj1PpBt_zbswThdLFkU-x78KOtzFxz8vfKEIcpnnvWHim1FHmeZcLDRfspPV9pk9vdcV-_7h5vv4l7h9_3l5f3YugLBTxIkkHU6u6MdZbqtS6sV4igLYNat1K2ViQ1IYmgFR1u25CG9q6spZs1ehKrdjX_dwpxT9bysUNXQ7U936kuM0ODdRGmTmQD0orOZ-zYl8OpJu4TeP8iJNoDK4tqkWFe1VIMedErZvSnFfaOQS3IHALgrlzCwK3IJg95sATuuKXaEvyXf9fJ-ydNFDyffPusn94q1e3cZn1 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ress_2018_09_009 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0218539315500291 crossref_primary_10_1080_00207543_2019_1602743 crossref_primary_10_1080_08982112_2017_1303070 crossref_primary_10_1108_JQME_09_2015_0045 crossref_primary_10_1109_TR_2016_2639358 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_omega_2024_103162 crossref_primary_10_1109_TR_2019_2955558 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ress_2021_107681 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0218539321500376 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2017_02_044 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00154-0 10.1109/24.85463 10.1080/095119298130750 10.1016/j.ress.2004.04.013 10.1109/24.974130 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00003-0 10.1002/nav.3800300113 10.1080/00207548408942470 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00166-7 10.1007/978-1-84882-472-0_13 10.1057/jors.1972.56 10.1057/jors.1980.153 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00148-X 10.1108/13552511111116277 10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00030-1 10.1080/03155986.1992.11732183 10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00073-0 10.1108/13552511111180195 10.1016/j.ress.2004.07.009 10.1108/13552510810861923 10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00031-3 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Emerald Group Publishing Limited Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Emerald Group Publishing Limited – notice: Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7TB 7WY 7WZ 7XB 8AO 8FD 8FE 8FG ABJCF AFKRA AZQEC BENPR BEZIV BGLVJ CCPQU DWQXO FR3 F~G GNUQQ HCIFZ K6~ L.- L.0 L6V M0C M2P M7S PHGZM PHGZT PKEHL PQBIZ PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS PYYUZ Q9U S0W |
DOI | 10.1108/JQME-11-2013-0074 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts ABI/INFORM Collection ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest Business Premium Collection Technology Collection (via ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection (via ProQuest) ProQuest Business Collection ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Professional Standard ProQuest Engineering Collection ABI/INFORM Global Science Database (via ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection) Engineering Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection ABI/INFORM Collection China ProQuest Central Basic DELNET Engineering & Technology Collection |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest One Business ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Essentials SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ABI/INFORM Complete ProQuest Central ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Engineering Collection ABI/INFORM Professional Standard ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) Engineering Collection Business Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global Engineering Database ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ABI/INFORM China ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest DELNET Engineering and Technology Collection Materials Science & Engineering Collection Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) |
DatabaseTitleList | Technology Research Database ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) Technology Research Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering |
EISSN | 1758-7832 |
EndPage | 185 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1108_JQME_11_2013_0074 10.1108/JQME-11-2013-0074 |
GroupedDBID | 0R 1WG 29L 3FY 3V. 4.4 5GY 5VS 70U 7WY 8AO 8FE 8FG 8R4 8R5 9E0 9F- AADTA AADXL AAGBP AAMCF AAUDR ABCTS ABFLS ABIJV ABJCF ABPTK ABSDC ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ACMTK ADOMW AEBZA AEDOK AEGYS AEUCW AFKRA AFZLO AJEBP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS APPLU ASMFL ATGMP AUCOK AVELQ AZQEC BENPR BEZIV BFOSL BGLVJ BLEHN BPHCQ BUONS CAG CS3 DU5 DWQXO EBS ECCUG EJD FNNZZ GEA GEB GEC GEI GMM GMN GMX GNUQQ GQ. GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE H13 HCIFZ HZ IPNFZ J1Y JI- JL0 K6 KBGRL L6V LOTEE LXI M0C M2P M7S NADUK O9- P2P PQBIZ PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PROAC PTHSS Q2X Q3A RIG RWL S0W SLOBJ TAE TDZ TEM TET TGG TMD TMF TMI TMK TMT TMX U5U UNMZH V1G WW Z11 Z12 Z21 Z22 ZYZAG .WW 0R~ AAIAH AAKOT AAPSD AAXBI AAYXX ABEAN ABJNI ABXQL ABYQI ACGFO ACTSA ADFRT ADWNT ADYJY AEFVF AEMMR AETHF AFNTC AFNZV AGHQT AGTVX AGZLY AHMHQ AIAFM AILOG AJFKA AODMV CCPQU CITATION HZ~ K6~ M42 PHGZM PHGZT PQGLB SCAQC SDURG 7TB 7XB 8FD FR3 L.- L.0 PKEHL PUEGO Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b2e5c7939d78a8e436d8a210058d155f22d802efcdc0239f6dcfcf9488e84d543 |
IEDL.DBID | ZYZAG |
ISSN | 1355-2511 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 09:30:14 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 08:57:37 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 12:37:24 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 31 00:49:10 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:21 EDT 2025 Tue Nov 23 15:44:31 EST 2021 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Inspection strategies Condition-based maintenance Series systems |
Language | English |
License | https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c380t-b2e5c7939d78a8e436d8a210058d155f22d802efcdc0239f6dcfcf9488e84d543 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
PQID | 2177168139 |
PQPubID | 23500 |
PageCount | 15 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1709734279 proquest_miscellaneous_1709737110 crossref_citationtrail_10_1108_JQME_11_2013_0074 crossref_primary_10_1108_JQME_11_2013_0074 proquest_journals_2177168139 emerald_primary_10_1108_JQME-11-2013-0074 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-05-11 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-05-11 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2015 text: 2015-05-11 day: 11 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Bradford |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Bradford |
PublicationTitle | Journal of quality in maintenance engineering |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
Publisher_xml | – name: Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
References | key2020122402033571800_b14 key2020122402033571800_b13 key2020122402033571800_b12 key2020122402033571800_b11 key2020122402033571800_b10 key2020122402033571800_b3 key2020122402033571800_b2 key2020122402033571800_b1 key2020122402033571800_b25 key2020122402033571800_b24 key2020122402033571800_b9 key2020122402033571800_b23 key2020122402033571800_b8 key2020122402033571800_b22 key2020122402033571800_b7 key2020122402033571800_b21 key2020122402033571800_b6 key2020122402033571800_b101 key2020122402033571800_b20 key2020122402033571800_b5 key2020122402033571800_b4 key2020122402033571800_b19 key2020122402033571800_b18 key2020122402033571800_b17 key2020122402033571800_b16 key2020122402033571800_b15 |
References_xml | – ident: key2020122402033571800_b1 doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00154-0 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b21 doi: 10.1109/24.85463 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b6 doi: 10.1080/095119298130750 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b24 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b5 doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2004.04.013 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b4 doi: 10.1109/24.974130 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b2 doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00003-0 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b11 doi: 10.1002/nav.3800300113 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b19 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b13 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b22 doi: 10.1080/00207548408942470 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b12 doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00166-7 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b9 doi: 10.1007/978-1-84882-472-0_13 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b18 doi: 10.1057/jors.1972.56 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b20 doi: 10.1057/jors.1980.153 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b16 doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00148-X – ident: key2020122402033571800_b15 doi: 10.1108/13552511111116277 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b23 doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00030-1 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b101 doi: 10.1080/03155986.1992.11732183 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b3 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b8 doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00073-0 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b14 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b17 doi: 10.1108/13552511111180195 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b25 doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2004.07.009 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b10 doi: 10.1108/13552510810861923 – ident: key2020122402033571800_b7 doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00031-3 |
SSID | ssj0003970 |
Score | 2.1008656 |
Snippet | Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual... Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual... Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual... |
SourceID | proquest crossref emerald |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 171 |
SubjectTerms | Complexity Cost engineering Decision making Failure Inspection Inspections Maintenance Maintenance costs Management science & operations Mathematical models Optimization Policies Probability distribution Quality management/systems Random variables Thresholds |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1ZS8NAEB60fdEH8cR6sYIvCos5dpPNk3i0lIKiouBbSPcAQZNqK_59Z5JtPRB9C2TChpmdmW-P-QbggPq52NRmPIkyw8VQxlwJI_gwNsIp41xYkyRdXiX9ezF4kA9-w23sr1VOY2IdqE2laY_8GKEzQnuFgOVk9MKpaxSdrvoWGvPQxhCsVAvaZ92r69tZLMZs29QJS8kJTPtzTep9M7i57FJRWVT3NwhS8S0z_SjP_QzRdd7pLcOSB4zstLHwCszZchUWv9AIrsHFKSstERWzCgPAM0o_lk0FZVWyUU38yxCbsoJN3itOl8irEnMNo9lnx6whc16H-1737rzPfXcErmMVTPgwslKjd2UmVYWyIk6MKnABF0hlECS4KDIqiKzTRlMBq0uMdtpl6LAWrSFFvAGtEofbBEYkbnGkTWyVFmGRZKmUqbFE3ZJZWbgOBFPN5NpTh1MHi6e8XkIEKidl4lNOysxJmR04mn0yangz_hI-9Or-VfablTqwMzVI7t1tnH9Ojg7sz16jo9DpR1Ha6m2chykxE4ko_VcmxZG3_h5mGxbwjyRdIwjDHWhNXt_sLqKTyXDPT8EPjGvejw priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | A nearly optimal inspection policy for a two-component series system |
URI | https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JQME-11-2013-0074/full/html https://www.proquest.com/docview/2177168139 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1709734279 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1709737110 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB613Qsc6AMQC-3KSL2A5G7i2IlzXOhuq0p9gKhUeokSPwSiTVZsVpX49cwk2S2tKuiBW6Q4dmzP0575BmCX6rm4xKU8FqnlslAR19JKXkRWem29DxuQpOOT-PBcHl2oixU4XeTCNGGV7XFMI6e_lzNyUocUuI1SeAk4QNVrjj4djyktTDQVClAXDunIevitvr5ahZ4I4wDJvHf59XJ0sBTOqH7bxGGlOFnX3UXng93dUVX38nVvZXajiCbrMF1MoY0_-bE3r4s98-seuuN_nOMGPOuMVjZqqWwTVly5BU__gDJ8DvsjVjoCS2YVCqFrbI3jNVmcVcmmDfgwQ_uY5ay-qTgFslcl_gUjDnAz1gJKv4DzyfjLx0PeVWjgJtJBzQvhlEEOT22ic-1kFFudoxMZKG3RUPFCWB0I5401lETrY2u88SkKDYcUoWT0EtZKHO4VMAKSi4SxkdNGhnmcJkol1hF8TOpU7vsQLDYjMx18OVXRuMoaNybQGS0VPmW0VBktVR_eLz-Zttgdf2v8rtuTB9ve2YM-bC9oIOtYfpahb4e-p0aLug9vl6-RWekGJi9dNZ9lYULoSFIk_2yT4MivH9HPG3iCv6UoniEMt2Gt_jl3O2gm1cUAVvXkYAC9D-OTs8-DjhF-AzcWDQU |
linkProvider | Emerald |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB4t5QA9IChFXShgpHJoJYvEsRPngFBFu2x3u5WQWqk3N-uHVAmSLbtVxZ_iNzKTx5ZFqJx6i5JJnIw_z4xjzzcAO1TPxWc-56nIHZdTlXAtneTTxMmgXQhxTZI0OUmHZ3J0rs578KvLhaFtlZ1NrA21qyz9I_-AoTOG9hoDlk-zK05Vo2h1tSuh0cBi7H_e4JRt_vHoAPv3vRCDw9PPQ95WFeA20dGCT4VXFlGZu0wX2sskdbrAiU-ktEPnGoRwOhI-WGcp8TOkzgYbcgS6x69QMsHnPoCHMkFPTpnpgy9Ly49nmqxkpTiF7u0qKlXaGX2dHFIKm6irKUSZXPGDfyUD3zqE2ssNnsKTNjxl-w2enkHPlxuw_gdp4XM42GelJ1pkVqG5-Y7Sl2WTr1mVbFbTDDOMhFnBFjcVpy3rVYmejRHW_Zw11NGbcHYvWnsBayU2twWMKOMSYV3itZVxkeaZUpnzRBSTe1WEPkSdZoxticqpXsY3U09YIm1ImXhkSJmGlNmHveUts4al4y7h3Vbd_5Rd6aU-bHcdYtrBPTe3UOzDu-VlHJa01lKUvrqemzgjHiQpsv_KZNjyy7ubeQuPhqeTY3N8dDJ-BY_x7RRtYIjjbVhb_Lj2rzEuWkzf1GBkcHHf6P8No4QaFg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3dS9xAEB_sCdI-9EMrPWvrFnxRWC8fu8nm8ahe1dZDQUF9WZL9gNI2Obwchf71nUly1yqiFPoWkkl2szszO7M78xuAbarn4lKX8STKLBeFjLkSVvAitsIr633YgCSdjJPDC3F8KS-XYDzPhWnCKtvtmEZPfy2n5KQOKHAbtfACcICq1xyfnRxQWljUVCjAtXBAW9aDifVPYBl5SyHHL19fXQ8_LXQzrr5t3rCUnIzr7pzz3q_dWqnupOv-UdnNOjR6AdX8D9rwk297s7rYM7_ugDv-v198Cc87k5UNWx57BUuuXIVnfwEZrsH-kJWOoJJZhSroB1Jjc00OZ1WySQM9zNA6Zjmrf1acwtirEjvBiP_dlLVw0q_hYnRw_vGQd_UZuIlVUPMictKgfGc2VblyIk6sytGFDKSyaKb4KLIqiJw31lAKrU-s8cZnqDIc8oMU8Tr0SmzuDTCCkYsjY2OnjAjzJEulTK0j8JjMydz3IZjPhTYdeDnV0PiuGycmUJpGCq80jZSmkerD7uKVSYvc8RDxTjcl99LemoI-bM5ZQHcCP9Xo2aHnqdCe7sOHxWMUVTp_yUtXzaY6TAkbSUTpozQptrzxD13agpXT_ZH-cjT-_Bae4m1JAQ5huAm9-mbm3qHdVBfvO2H4DSnHDI4 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+nearly+optimal+inspection+policy+for+a+two-component+series+system&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+quality+in+maintenance+engineering&rft.au=Maaroufi%2C+Ghofrane&rft.au=Chelbi%2C+Anis&rft.au=Rezg%2C+Nidhal&rft.au=Daoud%2C+Ait-Kadi&rft.date=2015-05-11&rft.issn=1355-2511&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=185&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108%2FJQME-11-2013-0074&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1355-2511&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1355-2511&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1355-2511&client=summon |