A nearly optimal inspection policy for a two-component series system

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual deterioration and whose failures are not self-announcing and can be detected only through inspection. Design/methodology/approach – The problem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of quality in maintenance engineering Vol. 21; no. 2; pp. 171 - 185
Main Authors Maaroufi, Ghofrane, Chelbi, Anis, Rezg, Nidhal, Daoud, Ait-Kadi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Bradford Emerald Group Publishing Limited 11.05.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual deterioration and whose failures are not self-announcing and can be detected only through inspection. Design/methodology/approach – The problem is tackled in the context of condition-based maintenance (CBM) with a maintenance model in the class of the control-limit policies for which the maintenance decision is made following inspection by comparison of the deterioration level to critical thresholds. A mathematical model is developed to express the total expected cost per time unit as a function of the inspection instants. Findings – For any given series system composed of two components with known critical deterioration threshold levels, and for any given set of costs related to inspection, inactivity due to failure, and preventive and corrective replacements of each component, a nearly optimal inspection sequence of the system is derived such as the total expected cost is reduced. Research limitations/implications – Due to the complexity of the cost model with the inspection instants (×1, ×2, ×3, …) being the decision variables, it has not been possible to derive the optimal solution. A quasi-optimal sequence of inspection times is derived along with the corresponding total average cost per time unit. Practical implications – In many practical situations in which CBM is implemented, a tradeoff between inspection costs and inactivity and replacement costs has to be balanced when determining the intervals between successive inspections at which the degradation level of the components should be assessed and compared to predetermined critical threshold levels. Inspecting too often would increase inspection costs but in the same time it would also increase the probability to avoid a failure and end up with a preventive replacement, whereas not inspecting often enough would increase the probability to end up with a failure increasing replacement and inactivity costs. Originality/value – While the inspection problem has been largely treated for single component systems, inspection policies become much more complex when considering multi-component systems. A two-component series system is considered in this paper.
AbstractList Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual deterioration and whose failures are not self-announcing and can be detected only through inspection. Design/methodology/approach – The problem is tackled in the context of condition-based maintenance (CBM) with a maintenance model in the class of the control-limit policies for which the maintenance decision is made following inspection by comparison of the deterioration level to critical thresholds. A mathematical model is developed to express the total expected cost per time unit as a function of the inspection instants. Findings – For any given series system composed of two components with known critical deterioration threshold levels, and for any given set of costs related to inspection, inactivity due to failure, and preventive and corrective replacements of each component, a nearly optimal inspection sequence of the system is derived such as the total expected cost is reduced. Research limitations/implications – Due to the complexity of the cost model with the inspection instants (×1, ×2, ×3, …) being the decision variables, it has not been possible to derive the optimal solution. A quasi-optimal sequence of inspection times is derived along with the corresponding total average cost per time unit. Practical implications – In many practical situations in which CBM is implemented, a tradeoff between inspection costs and inactivity and replacement costs has to be balanced when determining the intervals between successive inspections at which the degradation level of the components should be assessed and compared to predetermined critical threshold levels. Inspecting too often would increase inspection costs but in the same time it would also increase the probability to avoid a failure and end up with a preventive replacement, whereas not inspecting often enough would increase the probability to end up with a failure increasing replacement and inactivity costs. Originality/value – While the inspection problem has been largely treated for single component systems, inspection policies become much more complex when considering multi-component systems. A two-component series system is considered in this paper.
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual deterioration and whose failures are not self-announcing and can be detected only through inspection. Design/methodology/approach - The problem is tackled in the context of condition-based maintenance (CBM) with a maintenance model in the class of the control-limit policies for which the maintenance decision is made following inspection by comparison of the deterioration level to critical thresholds. A mathematical model is developed to express the total expected cost per time unit as a function of the inspection instants. Findings - For any given series system composed of two components with known critical deterioration threshold levels, and for any given set of costs related to inspection, inactivity due to failure, and preventive and corrective replacements of each component, a nearly optimal inspection sequence of the system is derived such as the total expected cost is reduced. Research limitations/implications - Due to the complexity of the cost model with the inspection instants (1, 2, 3,...) being the decision variables, it has not been possible to derive the optimal solution. A quasi-optimal sequence of inspection times is derived along with the corresponding total average cost per time unit. Practical implications - In many practical situations in which CBM is implemented, a tradeoff between inspection costs and inactivity and replacement costs has to be balanced when determining the intervals between successive inspections at which the degradation level of the components should be assessed and compared to predetermined critical threshold levels. Inspecting too often would increase inspection costs but in the same time it would also increase the probability to avoid a failure and end up with a preventive replacement, whereas not inspecting often enough would increase the probability to end up with a failure increasing replacement and inactivity costs. Originality/value - While the inspection problem has been largely treated for single component systems, inspection policies become much more complex when considering multi-component systems. A two-component series system is considered in this paper.
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual deterioration and whose failures are not self-announcing and can be detected only through inspection. Design/methodology/approach – The problem is tackled in the context of condition-based maintenance (CBM) with a maintenance model in the class of the control-limit policies for which the maintenance decision is made following inspection by comparison of the deterioration level to critical thresholds. A mathematical model is developed to express the total expected cost per time unit as a function of the inspection instants. Findings – For any given series system composed of two components with known critical deterioration threshold levels, and for any given set of costs related to inspection, inactivity due to failure, and preventive and corrective replacements of each component, a nearly optimal inspection sequence of the system is derived such as the total expected cost is reduced. Research limitations/implications – Due to the complexity of the cost model with the inspection instants (×1, ×2, ×3, …) being the decision variables, it has not been possible to derive the optimal solution. A quasi-optimal sequence of inspection times is derived along with the corresponding total average cost per time unit. Practical implications – In many practical situations in which CBM is implemented, a tradeoff between inspection costs and inactivity and replacement costs has to be balanced when determining the intervals between successive inspections at which the degradation level of the components should be assessed and compared to predetermined critical threshold levels. Inspecting too often would increase inspection costs but in the same time it would also increase the probability to avoid a failure and end up with a preventive replacement, whereas not inspecting often enough would increase the probability to end up with a failure increasing replacement and inactivity costs. Originality/value – While the inspection problem has been largely treated for single component systems, inspection policies become much more complex when considering multi-component systems. A two-component series system is considered in this paper.
Author Rezg, Nidhal
Chelbi, Anis
Daoud, Ait-Kadi
Maaroufi, Ghofrane
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ghofrane
  surname: Maaroufi
  fullname: Maaroufi, Ghofrane
  organization: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Anis
  surname: Chelbi
  fullname: Chelbi, Anis
  organization: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Nidhal
  surname: Rezg
  fullname: Rezg, Nidhal
  organization: College of Mathematics, Information, Mechanics and Automatics, University of Lorraine, Metz, France
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ait-Kadi
  surname: Daoud
  fullname: Daoud, Ait-Kadi
  organization: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Laval University, Québec City, Canada
BookMark eNqNkU9P3DAQxS0EErD0A_RmqZdeXGbseO0cEaUtCISQ6NkyzkTKKolT26tqvz2JlktXqOI0c3hv_rzfOTse40iMfUb4hgj28u7p4UYgCgmoBICpjtgZGm2FsUoez73SWkiNeMrOc94AgKoNnLHvV3wkn_odj1PpBt_zbswThdLFkU-x78KOtzFxz8vfKEIcpnnvWHim1FHmeZcLDRfspPV9pk9vdcV-_7h5vv4l7h9_3l5f3YugLBTxIkkHU6u6MdZbqtS6sV4igLYNat1K2ViQ1IYmgFR1u25CG9q6spZs1ehKrdjX_dwpxT9bysUNXQ7U936kuM0ODdRGmTmQD0orOZ-zYl8OpJu4TeP8iJNoDK4tqkWFe1VIMedErZvSnFfaOQS3IHALgrlzCwK3IJg95sATuuKXaEvyXf9fJ-ydNFDyffPusn94q1e3cZn1
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ress_2018_09_009
crossref_primary_10_1142_S0218539315500291
crossref_primary_10_1080_00207543_2019_1602743
crossref_primary_10_1080_08982112_2017_1303070
crossref_primary_10_1108_JQME_09_2015_0045
crossref_primary_10_1109_TR_2016_2639358
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_omega_2024_103162
crossref_primary_10_1109_TR_2019_2955558
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ress_2021_107681
crossref_primary_10_1142_S0218539321500376
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejor_2017_02_044
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00154-0
10.1109/24.85463
10.1080/095119298130750
10.1016/j.ress.2004.04.013
10.1109/24.974130
10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00003-0
10.1002/nav.3800300113
10.1080/00207548408942470
10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00166-7
10.1007/978-1-84882-472-0_13
10.1057/jors.1972.56
10.1057/jors.1980.153
10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00148-X
10.1108/13552511111116277
10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00030-1
10.1080/03155986.1992.11732183
10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00073-0
10.1108/13552511111180195
10.1016/j.ress.2004.07.009
10.1108/13552510810861923
10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00031-3
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015
Copyright_xml – notice: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
– notice: Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7TB
7WY
7WZ
7XB
8AO
8FD
8FE
8FG
ABJCF
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
BGLVJ
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
F~G
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K6~
L.-
L.0
L6V
M0C
M2P
M7S
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PQBIZ
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
PYYUZ
Q9U
S0W
DOI 10.1108/JQME-11-2013-0074
DatabaseName CrossRef
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
ABI/INFORM Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Business Premium Collection
Technology Collection (via ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection (via ProQuest)
ProQuest Business Collection
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ProQuest Engineering Collection
ABI/INFORM Global
Science Database (via ProQuest SciTech Premium Collection)
Engineering Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering Collection
ABI/INFORM Collection China
ProQuest Central Basic
DELNET Engineering & Technology Collection
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Essentials
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ABI/INFORM Complete
ProQuest Central
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Engineering Collection
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
Engineering Collection
Business Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global
Engineering Database
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Science Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ABI/INFORM China
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Business Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest DELNET Engineering and Technology Collection
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
DatabaseTitleList
Technology Research Database
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
Technology Research Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
EISSN 1758-7832
EndPage 185
ExternalDocumentID 10_1108_JQME_11_2013_0074
10.1108/JQME-11-2013-0074
GroupedDBID 0R
1WG
29L
3FY
3V.
4.4
5GY
5VS
70U
7WY
8AO
8FE
8FG
8R4
8R5
9E0
9F-
AADTA
AADXL
AAGBP
AAMCF
AAUDR
ABCTS
ABFLS
ABIJV
ABJCF
ABPTK
ABSDC
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACIWK
ACMTK
ADOMW
AEBZA
AEDOK
AEGYS
AEUCW
AFKRA
AFZLO
AJEBP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
APPLU
ASMFL
ATGMP
AUCOK
AVELQ
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
BFOSL
BGLVJ
BLEHN
BPHCQ
BUONS
CAG
CS3
DU5
DWQXO
EBS
ECCUG
EJD
FNNZZ
GEA
GEB
GEC
GEI
GMM
GMN
GMX
GNUQQ
GQ.
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE
H13
HCIFZ
HZ
IPNFZ
J1Y
JI-
JL0
K6
KBGRL
L6V
LOTEE
LXI
M0C
M2P
M7S
NADUK
O9-
P2P
PQBIZ
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PROAC
PTHSS
Q2X
Q3A
RIG
RWL
S0W
SLOBJ
TAE
TDZ
TEM
TET
TGG
TMD
TMF
TMI
TMK
TMT
TMX
U5U
UNMZH
V1G
WW
Z11
Z12
Z21
Z22
ZYZAG
.WW
0R~
AAIAH
AAKOT
AAPSD
AAXBI
AAYXX
ABEAN
ABJNI
ABXQL
ABYQI
ACGFO
ACTSA
ADFRT
ADWNT
ADYJY
AEFVF
AEMMR
AETHF
AFNTC
AFNZV
AGHQT
AGTVX
AGZLY
AHMHQ
AIAFM
AILOG
AJFKA
AODMV
CCPQU
CITATION
HZ~
K6~
M42
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQGLB
SCAQC
SDURG
7TB
7XB
8FD
FR3
L.-
L.0
PKEHL
PUEGO
Q9U
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-b2e5c7939d78a8e436d8a210058d155f22d802efcdc0239f6dcfcf9488e84d543
IEDL.DBID ZYZAG
ISSN 1355-2511
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 09:30:14 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 08:57:37 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 12:37:24 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 31 00:49:10 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:52:21 EDT 2025
Tue Nov 23 15:44:31 EST 2021
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Inspection strategies
Condition-based maintenance
Series systems
Language English
License https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c380t-b2e5c7939d78a8e436d8a210058d155f22d802efcdc0239f6dcfcf9488e84d543
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PQID 2177168139
PQPubID 23500
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1709734279
proquest_miscellaneous_1709737110
crossref_citationtrail_10_1108_JQME_11_2013_0074
crossref_primary_10_1108_JQME_11_2013_0074
proquest_journals_2177168139
emerald_primary_10_1108_JQME-11-2013-0074
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-05-11
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-05-11
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-05-11
  day: 11
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Bradford
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Bradford
PublicationTitle Journal of quality in maintenance engineering
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Publisher_xml – name: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
References key2020122402033571800_b14
key2020122402033571800_b13
key2020122402033571800_b12
key2020122402033571800_b11
key2020122402033571800_b10
key2020122402033571800_b3
key2020122402033571800_b2
key2020122402033571800_b1
key2020122402033571800_b25
key2020122402033571800_b24
key2020122402033571800_b9
key2020122402033571800_b23
key2020122402033571800_b8
key2020122402033571800_b22
key2020122402033571800_b7
key2020122402033571800_b21
key2020122402033571800_b6
key2020122402033571800_b101
key2020122402033571800_b20
key2020122402033571800_b5
key2020122402033571800_b4
key2020122402033571800_b19
key2020122402033571800_b18
key2020122402033571800_b17
key2020122402033571800_b16
key2020122402033571800_b15
References_xml – ident: key2020122402033571800_b1
  doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00154-0
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b21
  doi: 10.1109/24.85463
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b6
  doi: 10.1080/095119298130750
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b24
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b5
  doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2004.04.013
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b4
  doi: 10.1109/24.974130
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b2
  doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00003-0
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b11
  doi: 10.1002/nav.3800300113
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b19
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b13
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b22
  doi: 10.1080/00207548408942470
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b12
  doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00166-7
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b9
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-84882-472-0_13
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b18
  doi: 10.1057/jors.1972.56
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b20
  doi: 10.1057/jors.1980.153
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b16
  doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00148-X
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b15
  doi: 10.1108/13552511111116277
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b23
  doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00030-1
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b101
  doi: 10.1080/03155986.1992.11732183
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b3
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b8
  doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00073-0
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b14
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b17
  doi: 10.1108/13552511111180195
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b25
  doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2004.07.009
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b10
  doi: 10.1108/13552510810861923
– ident: key2020122402033571800_b7
  doi: 10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00031-3
SSID ssj0003970
Score 2.1008656
Snippet Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual...
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to determine a nearly optimal inspection sequence for a series system consisting of two components subject to gradual...
SourceID proquest
crossref
emerald
SourceType Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 171
SubjectTerms Complexity
Cost engineering
Decision making
Failure
Inspection
Inspections
Maintenance
Maintenance costs
Management science & operations
Mathematical models
Optimization
Policies
Probability distribution
Quality management/systems
Random variables
Thresholds
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1ZS8NAEB60fdEH8cR6sYIvCos5dpPNk3i0lIKiouBbSPcAQZNqK_59Z5JtPRB9C2TChpmdmW-P-QbggPq52NRmPIkyw8VQxlwJI_gwNsIp41xYkyRdXiX9ezF4kA9-w23sr1VOY2IdqE2laY_8GKEzQnuFgOVk9MKpaxSdrvoWGvPQxhCsVAvaZ92r69tZLMZs29QJS8kJTPtzTep9M7i57FJRWVT3NwhS8S0z_SjP_QzRdd7pLcOSB4zstLHwCszZchUWv9AIrsHFKSstERWzCgPAM0o_lk0FZVWyUU38yxCbsoJN3itOl8irEnMNo9lnx6whc16H-1737rzPfXcErmMVTPgwslKjd2UmVYWyIk6MKnABF0hlECS4KDIqiKzTRlMBq0uMdtpl6LAWrSFFvAGtEofbBEYkbnGkTWyVFmGRZKmUqbFE3ZJZWbgOBFPN5NpTh1MHi6e8XkIEKidl4lNOysxJmR04mn0yangz_hI-9Or-VfablTqwMzVI7t1tnH9Ojg7sz16jo9DpR1Ha6m2chykxE4ko_VcmxZG3_h5mGxbwjyRdIwjDHWhNXt_sLqKTyXDPT8EPjGvejw
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title A nearly optimal inspection policy for a two-component series system
URI https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JQME-11-2013-0074/full/html
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2177168139
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1709734279
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1709737110
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB613Qsc6AMQC-3KSL2A5G7i2IlzXOhuq0p9gKhUeokSPwSiTVZsVpX49cwk2S2tKuiBW6Q4dmzP0575BmCX6rm4xKU8FqnlslAR19JKXkRWem29DxuQpOOT-PBcHl2oixU4XeTCNGGV7XFMI6e_lzNyUocUuI1SeAk4QNVrjj4djyktTDQVClAXDunIevitvr5ahZ4I4wDJvHf59XJ0sBTOqH7bxGGlOFnX3UXng93dUVX38nVvZXajiCbrMF1MoY0_-bE3r4s98-seuuN_nOMGPOuMVjZqqWwTVly5BU__gDJ8DvsjVjoCS2YVCqFrbI3jNVmcVcmmDfgwQ_uY5ay-qTgFslcl_gUjDnAz1gJKv4DzyfjLx0PeVWjgJtJBzQvhlEEOT22ic-1kFFudoxMZKG3RUPFCWB0I5401lETrY2u88SkKDYcUoWT0EtZKHO4VMAKSi4SxkdNGhnmcJkol1hF8TOpU7vsQLDYjMx18OVXRuMoaNybQGS0VPmW0VBktVR_eLz-Zttgdf2v8rtuTB9ve2YM-bC9oIOtYfpahb4e-p0aLug9vl6-RWekGJi9dNZ9lYULoSFIk_2yT4MivH9HPG3iCv6UoniEMt2Gt_jl3O2gm1cUAVvXkYAC9D-OTs8-DjhF-AzcWDQU
linkProvider Emerald
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB4t5QA9IChFXShgpHJoJYvEsRPngFBFu2x3u5WQWqk3N-uHVAmSLbtVxZ_iNzKTx5ZFqJx6i5JJnIw_z4xjzzcAO1TPxWc-56nIHZdTlXAtneTTxMmgXQhxTZI0OUmHZ3J0rs578KvLhaFtlZ1NrA21qyz9I_-AoTOG9hoDlk-zK05Vo2h1tSuh0cBi7H_e4JRt_vHoAPv3vRCDw9PPQ95WFeA20dGCT4VXFlGZu0wX2sskdbrAiU-ktEPnGoRwOhI-WGcp8TOkzgYbcgS6x69QMsHnPoCHMkFPTpnpgy9Ly49nmqxkpTiF7u0qKlXaGX2dHFIKm6irKUSZXPGDfyUD3zqE2ssNnsKTNjxl-w2enkHPlxuw_gdp4XM42GelJ1pkVqG5-Y7Sl2WTr1mVbFbTDDOMhFnBFjcVpy3rVYmejRHW_Zw11NGbcHYvWnsBayU2twWMKOMSYV3itZVxkeaZUpnzRBSTe1WEPkSdZoxticqpXsY3U09YIm1ImXhkSJmGlNmHveUts4al4y7h3Vbd_5Rd6aU-bHcdYtrBPTe3UOzDu-VlHJa01lKUvrqemzgjHiQpsv_KZNjyy7ubeQuPhqeTY3N8dDJ-BY_x7RRtYIjjbVhb_Lj2rzEuWkzf1GBkcHHf6P8No4QaFg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3dS9xAEB_sCdI-9EMrPWvrFnxRWC8fu8nm8ahe1dZDQUF9WZL9gNI2Obwchf71nUly1yqiFPoWkkl2szszO7M78xuAbarn4lKX8STKLBeFjLkSVvAitsIr633YgCSdjJPDC3F8KS-XYDzPhWnCKtvtmEZPfy2n5KQOKHAbtfACcICq1xyfnRxQWljUVCjAtXBAW9aDifVPYBl5SyHHL19fXQ8_LXQzrr5t3rCUnIzr7pzz3q_dWqnupOv-UdnNOjR6AdX8D9rwk297s7rYM7_ugDv-v198Cc87k5UNWx57BUuuXIVnfwEZrsH-kJWOoJJZhSroB1Jjc00OZ1WySQM9zNA6Zjmrf1acwtirEjvBiP_dlLVw0q_hYnRw_vGQd_UZuIlVUPMictKgfGc2VblyIk6sytGFDKSyaKb4KLIqiJw31lAKrU-s8cZnqDIc8oMU8Tr0SmzuDTCCkYsjY2OnjAjzJEulTK0j8JjMydz3IZjPhTYdeDnV0PiuGycmUJpGCq80jZSmkerD7uKVSYvc8RDxTjcl99LemoI-bM5ZQHcCP9Xo2aHnqdCe7sOHxWMUVTp_yUtXzaY6TAkbSUTpozQptrzxD13agpXT_ZH-cjT-_Bae4m1JAQ5huAm9-mbm3qHdVBfvO2H4DSnHDI4
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+nearly+optimal+inspection+policy+for+a+two-component+series+system&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+quality+in+maintenance+engineering&rft.au=Maaroufi%2C+Ghofrane&rft.au=Chelbi%2C+Anis&rft.au=Rezg%2C+Nidhal&rft.au=Daoud%2C+Ait-Kadi&rft.date=2015-05-11&rft.issn=1355-2511&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=185&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108%2FJQME-11-2013-0074&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1355-2511&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1355-2511&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1355-2511&client=summon