Multi-Fidelity Optimization of a Composite Airliner Wing Subject to Structural and Aeroelastic Constraints

• Published in: Aerospace Vol. 8; no. 12; p. 398
• Main Authors: Kafkas, Angelos, Kilimtzidis, Spyridon, Kotzakolios, Athanasios, Kostopoulos, Vassilis, Lampeas, George
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 01.12.2021
• Subjects: Accuracy; Aerodynamics; Aeronautics; Aircraft; Algorithms; Composite materials; Computational efficiency; computational fluid dynamics; Computing costs; Computing time; Decision making; Design; Design optimization; Modules; multi-fidelity optimization; Optimization algorithms; Scientific papers; structural optimization; wing design optimization
• DOI: 10.3390/aerospace8120398
• ISSN: 2226-4310

Efficient optimization is a prerequisite to realize the full potential of an aeronautical structure. The success of an optimization framework is predominately influenced by the ability to capture all relevant physics. Furthermore, high computational efficiency allows a greater number of runs during the design optimization process to support decision-making. The efficiency can be improved by the selection of highly optimized algorithms and by reducing the dimensionality of the optimization problem by formulating it using a finite number of significant parameters. A plethora of variable-fidelity tools, dictated by each design stage, are commonly used, ranging from costly high-fidelity to low-cost, low-fidelity methods. Unfortunately, despite rapid solution times, an optimization framework utilizing low-fidelity tools does not necessarily capture the physical problem accurately. At the same time, high-fidelity solution methods incur a very high computational cost. Aiming to bridge the gap and combine the best of both worlds, a multi-fidelity optimization framework was constructed in this research paper. In our approach, the low-fidelity modules and especially the equivalent-plate methodology structural representation, capable of drastically reducing the associated computational time, form the backbone of the optimization framework and a MIDACO optimizer is tasked with providing an initial optimized design. The higher fidelity modules are then employed to explore possible further gains in performance. The developed framework was applied to a benchmark airliner wing. As demonstrated, reasonable mass reduction was obtained for a current state of the art configuration.