Investigating Whether the Mass of a Tool Replica Influences Virtual Training Learning Outcomes

Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as a promising solution to address the pressing concern of transferring know-how in the manufacturing industry. Making an immersive training experience often involves designing an instrumented replica of a tool whose use is to be learned through virtual training. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics Vol. 30; no. 5; pp. 2411 - 2421
Main Authors Cauquis, Julien, Peillard, Etienne, Dominjon, Lionel, Duval, Thierry, Moreau, Guillaume
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States IEEE 01.05.2024
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as a promising solution to address the pressing concern of transferring know-how in the manufacturing industry. Making an immersive training experience often involves designing an instrumented replica of a tool whose use is to be learned through virtual training. The process of making a replica can alter its mass, making it different from that of the original tool. As far as we know, the influence of this difference on learning outcomes has never been evaluated. To investigate this subject, an immersive training experience was designed with pre and post-training phases under real conditions, dedicated to learning the use of a rotary tool. 80 participants took part in this study, split into three groups: a control group performing the virtual training using a replica with the same mass as the original tool (\mathrm{m}=100\%), a second group that used a replica with a lighter mass than the original tool (\mathrm{m}= 50\%) and a third group using a replica heavier than the original tool (\mathrm{m}=150\%). Despite variations in the mass of the replica used for training, this study revealed that the learning outcomes remained comparable across all groups, while also demonstrating significant enhancements in certain performance measures, including task completion time. Overall, these findings provide useful insights regarding the design of tool replicas for immersive training.
AbstractList Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as a promising solution to address the pressing concern of transferring know-how in the manufacturing industry. Making an immersive training experience often involves designing an instrumented replica of a tool whose use is to be learned through virtual training. The process of making a replica can alter its mass, making it different from that of the original tool. As far as we know, the influence of this difference on learning outcomes has never been evaluated. To investigate this subject, an immersive training experience was designed with pre and post-training phases under real conditions, dedicated to learning the use of a rotary tool. 80 participants took part in this study, split into three groups: a control group performing the virtual training using a replica with the same mass as the original tool (\mathrm{m}=100\%), a second group that used a replica with a lighter mass than the original tool (\mathrm{m}= 50\%) and a third group using a replica heavier than the original tool (\mathrm{m}=150\%). Despite variations in the mass of the replica used for training, this study revealed that the learning outcomes remained comparable across all groups, while also demonstrating significant enhancements in certain performance measures, including task completion time. Overall, these findings provide useful insights regarding the design of tool replicas for immersive training.
Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as a promising solution to address the pressing concern of transferring know-how in the manufacturing industry. Making an immersive training experience often involves designing an instrumented replica of a tool whose use is to be learned through virtual training. The process of making a replica can alter its mass, making it different from that of the original tool. As far as we know, the influence of this difference on learning outcomes has never been evaluated. To investigate this subject, an immersive training experience was designed with pre and post-training phases under real conditions, dedicated to learning the use of a rotary tool. 80 participants took part in this study, split into three groups: a control group performing the virtual training using a replica with the same mass as the original tool (m = 100%), a second group that used a replica with a lighter mass than the original tool (m = 50%), and a third group using a replica heavier than the original tool (m = 150%). Despite variations in the mass of the replica used for training, this study revealed that the learning outcomes remained comparable across all groups, while also demonstrating significant enhancements in certain performance measures, including task completion time. Overall, these findings provide useful insights regarding the design of tool replicas for immersive training.
Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as a promising solution to address the pressing concern of transferring know-how in the manufacturing industry. Making an immersive training experience often involves designing an instrumented replica of a tool whose use is to be learned through virtual training. The process of making a replica can alter its mass, making it different from that of the original tool. As far as we know, the influence of this difference on learning outcomes has never been evaluated. To investigate this subject, an immersive training experience was designed with pre and post-training phases under real conditions, dedicated to learning the use of a rotary tool. 80 participants took part in this study, split into three groups: a control group performing the virtual training using a replica with the same mass as the original tool ($\mathrm{m}=100\%$), a second group that used a replica with a lighter mass than the original tool ($\mathrm{m}= 50\%$) and a third group using a replica heavier than the original tool ($\mathrm{m}=150\%$). Despite variations in the mass of the replica used for training, this study revealed that the learning outcomes remained comparable across all groups, while also demonstrating significant enhancements in certain performance measures, including task completion time. Overall, these findings provide useful insights regarding the design of tool replicas for immersive training.Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as a promising solution to address the pressing concern of transferring know-how in the manufacturing industry. Making an immersive training experience often involves designing an instrumented replica of a tool whose use is to be learned through virtual training. The process of making a replica can alter its mass, making it different from that of the original tool. As far as we know, the influence of this difference on learning outcomes has never been evaluated. To investigate this subject, an immersive training experience was designed with pre and post-training phases under real conditions, dedicated to learning the use of a rotary tool. 80 participants took part in this study, split into three groups: a control group performing the virtual training using a replica with the same mass as the original tool ($\mathrm{m}=100\%$), a second group that used a replica with a lighter mass than the original tool ($\mathrm{m}= 50\%$) and a third group using a replica heavier than the original tool ($\mathrm{m}=150\%$). Despite variations in the mass of the replica used for training, this study revealed that the learning outcomes remained comparable across all groups, while also demonstrating significant enhancements in certain performance measures, including task completion time. Overall, these findings provide useful insights regarding the design of tool replicas for immersive training.
Author Cauquis, Julien
Peillard, Etienne
Duval, Thierry
Dominjon, Lionel
Moreau, Guillaume
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Julien
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7258-586X
  surname: Cauquis
  fullname: Cauquis, Julien
  email: julien.cauquis@clarte-lab.fr
  organization: CLARTE, France
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Etienne
  orcidid: 0000-0002-4429-670X
  surname: Peillard
  fullname: Peillard, Etienne
  email: etienne.peillard@imt-atlantique.fr
  organization: CLARTE, France
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Lionel
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4300-1671
  surname: Dominjon
  fullname: Dominjon, Lionel
  email: lionel.dominjon@clarte-lab.fr
  organization: Lab-STICC, IMT Atlantique, UMR CNRS 6285, France
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Thierry
  surname: Duval
  fullname: Duval, Thierry
  email: thierry.duval@imt-atlantique.fr
  organization: CLARTE, France
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Guillaume
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2215-1865
  surname: Moreau
  fullname: Moreau, Guillaume
  email: guillaume.moreau@imt-atlantique.fr
  organization: CLARTE, France
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38437074$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://hal.science/hal-04427994$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNpdkdtq3DAQhkVJaQ7tAxRKEfSmvfBWJ1ury7DksLAhULbpXcVYHmcVvNZWsgN5-8jdbSi5mRmG759h5j8lR33okZCPnM04Z-b7-m5xNRNMqJmUWjDF35ATbhQvWMmqo1wzrQtRieqYnKb0wBhXam7ekWM5V1IzrU7I72X_iGnw9zD4_p7-2uCwwUhzoDeQEg0tBboOoaM_cNd5B3TZt92IvcNE73wcRujoOoLvJ_kKIf4tbsfBhS2m9-RtC13CD4d8Rn5eXqwX18Xq9mq5OF8VTmozFAa0KZumrlyjWq3rtlEAwkBjmgoqV9aigZIJhwLmLUoheSuME05IU2cZl2fk237uBjq7i34L8ckG8Pb6fGWnHlNKaGPU48R-3bO7GP6M-Xi79clh10GPYUxWGKk141UlM_rlFfoQxtjnS6zM71bGGD5Rnw_UWG-xedn_78sZ4HvAxZBSxPYF4cxOTtrJSTs5aQ9OZs2nvcYj4n-8Kud5sXwGd5WYrQ
CODEN ITVGEA
Cites_doi 10.4236/jcc.2021.99001
10.3389/frvir.2022.797993
10.1177/0018720820904229
10.1201/b21874
10.1145/3173574.3173856
10.1007/978-3-031-15553-6_5
10.20870/ijvr.2021.21.2.4620
10.1145/3313831.3376303
10.1145/3491102.3517696
10.1145/3533377
10.1145/3267782.3267790
10.1145/2929490.2929497
10.1145/1978942.1978963
10.120/19781498710411-35
10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x
10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
10.1145/2702123.2702389
10.3390/technologies8040077
10.1016/j.ajic.2022.05.023
10.1007/s10055-018-0354-3
10.1080/23808985.1987.11678663
10.1109/access.2021.3131525
10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002
10.3390/encyclopedia3020026
10.1145/1864349.1864395
10.1007/s10648-014-9262-6
10.1016/s0005-7894(00)80032-5
10.1080/24699322.2023.2189047
10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2
10.1145/3489849.3489933
10.1145/3411763.3451842
10.3390/mti6070049
10.1109/vr.2000.840369
10.1145/3379337.3415812
10.1016/b978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
10.3389/frvir.2021.645153
10.1145/191666.191821
10.1080/00028897708984406
10.1145/3313831.3376394
10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
10.1145/3290605.3300441
10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593466
10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9
10.1007/978-3-540-69744-2_18
10.18637/jss.v050.i12
10.1109/vrw50115.2020.00022
10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
10.3390/ijerph19095241
10.1007/s10758-022-09630-w
10.1109/mcg.1997.1626171
10.1371/journal.pone.0248225
10.3389/frvir.2021.597487
10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104836
10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4
10.1109/ismar-adjunct.2016.0075
10.1109/vr50410.2021.00031
10.1109/ismar50242.2020.00042
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2024
– notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
DBID 97E
RIA
RIE
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7SC
7SP
8FD
JQ2
L7M
L~C
L~D
7X8
1XC
VOOES
DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2024.3372041
DatabaseName IEEE Xplore (IEEE)
IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present
IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
CrossRef
PubMed
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
Electronics & Communications Abstracts
Technology Research Database
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
MEDLINE - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Technology Research Database
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic
Electronics & Communications Abstracts
ProQuest Computer Science Collection
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
Technology Research Database

MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: RIE
  name: IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Engineering
Computer Science
EISSN 1941-0506
EndPage 2421
ExternalDocumentID oai_HAL_hal_04427994v1
38437074
10_1109_TVCG_2024_3372041
10458414
Genre orig-research
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Research Agency
  grantid: ANR-21-ESRE-0030
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.DC
0R~
29I
4.4
53G
5GY
5VS
6IK
97E
AAJGR
AARMG
AASAJ
AAWTH
ABAZT
ABQJQ
ABVLG
ACGFO
ACIWK
AENEX
AETIX
AGQYO
AGSQL
AHBIQ
AI.
AIBXA
AKJIK
AKQYR
ALLEH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ATWAV
BEFXN
BFFAM
BGNUA
BKEBE
BPEOZ
CS3
DU5
EBS
EJD
F5P
HZ~
H~9
IEDLZ
IFIPE
IFJZH
IPLJI
JAVBF
LAI
M43
O9-
OCL
P2P
PQQKQ
RIA
RIE
RNI
RNS
RZB
TN5
VH1
AAYOK
AAYXX
CITATION
RIG
NPM
7SC
7SP
8FD
JQ2
L7M
L~C
L~D
7X8
1XC
VOOES
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-9a795ddb6cd4f77bfd4aa29ad9d6a6c5b2da502ce2a8fe3231f29c2c239bddb13
IEDL.DBID RIE
ISSN 1077-2626
1941-0506
IngestDate Thu May 08 06:32:37 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 02:57:09 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 06:36:10 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:56:34 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:12:21 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 27 02:09:07 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 5
Keywords Weight Perception
Virtual Training
Prop Design
User Study
Virtual Reality
Language English
License https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html
https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-029
https://doi.org/10.15223/policy-037
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c379t-9a795ddb6cd4f77bfd4aa29ad9d6a6c5b2da502ce2a8fe3231f29c2c239bddb13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-2215-1865
0000-0002-4429-670X
0000-0001-7258-586X
0000-0003-4300-1671
OpenAccessLink https://hal.science/hal-04427994
PMID 38437074
PQID 3041499913
PQPubID 75741
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2937701663
proquest_journals_3041499913
crossref_primary_10_1109_TVCG_2024_3372041
ieee_primary_10458414
hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_04427994v1
pubmed_primary_38437074
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: New York
PublicationTitle IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics
PublicationTitleAbbrev TVCG
PublicationTitleAlternate IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher IEEE
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
Publisher_xml – name: IEEE
– name: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
– name: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
References ref13
ref57
ref12
ref56
ref59
ref14
ref58
ref11
ref55
ref10
ref54
Nilsson (ref43) 2021
ref17
ref16
ref19
ref18
ref51
ref50
Sauter (ref53) 2023
ref46
ref45
(ref42) 2023
ref48
ref47
ref41
ref44
ref49
ref8
Byers (ref6) 1989
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref5
ref40
ref35
ref34
ref37
ref31
ref30
ref33
ref32
ref2
ref39
Sauro (ref52) 2016
ref38
ref24
ref23
ref26
Bloom (ref1) 1956
ref25
ref64
ref63
ref22
ref66
East (ref15) 2005
ref21
ref65
ref28
ref27
ref29
(ref20) 2023
Meiselwitz (ref36) 2008
ref60
ref62
ref61
References_xml – volume-title: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals
  year: 1956
  ident: ref1
– ident: ref65
  doi: 10.4236/jcc.2021.99001
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.3389/frvir.2022.797993
– year: 2005
  ident: ref15
  publication-title: Ergonomic Guidelines for Selecting Hand and Power Tools
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1177/0018720820904229
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.1201/b21874
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.1145/3173574.3173856
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-15553-6_5
– year: 2023
  ident: ref20
  publication-title: CCOHS: Hand Tool Ergonomics - Tool Design
– ident: ref62
  doi: 10.20870/ijvr.2021.21.2.4620
– ident: ref58
  doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376303
– volume-title: Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research
  year: 2016
  ident: ref52
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1145/3491102.3517696
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.1145/3533377
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1145/3267782.3267790
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1145/2929490.2929497
– ident: ref63
  doi: 10.1145/1978942.1978963
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.120/19781498710411-35
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1964.tb00553.x
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
– ident: ref56
  doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702389
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.3390/technologies8040077
– ident: ref45
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.05.023
– ident: ref46
  doi: 10.1007/s10055-018-0354-3
– ident: ref48
  doi: 10.1080/23808985.1987.11678663
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.1109/access.2021.3131525
– ident: ref49
  doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.002
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia3020026
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.1145/1864349.1864395
– year: 1989
  ident: ref6
  article-title: Traditional and Raw Task Load Index (TLX) Correlations: Are paired comparisons necessary?
  publication-title: Advances in Industrial Erfonomics and Safety l: Taylor and Francis.
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1007/s10648-014-9262-6
– ident: ref3
  doi: 10.1016/s0005-7894(00)80032-5
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1080/24699322.2023.2189047
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2
– ident: ref60
  doi: 10.1145/3489849.3489933
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1145/3411763.3451842
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.3390/mti6070049
– ident: ref27
  doi: 10.1109/vr.2000.840369
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.1145/3379337.3415812
– ident: ref59
  doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
– ident: ref64
  doi: 10.3389/frvir.2021.645153
– ident: ref22
  doi: 10.1145/191666.191821
– ident: ref61
  doi: 10.1080/00028897708984406
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376394
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
– ident: ref66
  doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300441
– ident: ref50
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.593466
– ident: ref57
  doi: 10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69744-2_18
– volume-title: CHI 2021 Workshop on Everyday Proxy Objects for Virtual Reality
  year: 2021
  ident: ref43
  article-title: Haptic Proxies for Virtual Reality: Success Criteria and Taxonomy
– ident: ref44
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v050.i12
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1109/vrw50115.2020.00022
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307
– ident: ref41
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095241
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.1007/s10758-022-09630-w
– ident: ref51
  doi: 10.1109/mcg.1997.1626171
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248225
– ident: ref55
  doi: 10.3389/frvir.2021.597487
– year: 2023
  ident: ref53
  article-title: Its Tool Time: Exploring Tool Design Alternatives for Virtual Reality Trainings
  publication-title: ECIS 2023 Research Papers
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104836
– ident: ref54
  doi: 10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1109/ismar-adjunct.2016.0075
– volume-title: TLX @ NASA Ames - Home
  year: 2023
  ident: ref42
– year: 2008
  ident: ref36
  article-title: Investigating the Connection between Usability and Learning Outcomes in Online Learning Environments
  publication-title: MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching
– ident: ref47
  doi: 10.1109/vr50410.2021.00031
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1109/ismar50242.2020.00042
SSID ssj0014489
Score 2.4227407
Snippet Virtual Reality (VR) has emerged as a promising solution to address the pressing concern of transferring know-how in the manufacturing industry. Making an...
SourceID hal
proquest
pubmed
crossref
ieee
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 2411
SubjectTerms Cognitive load
Completion time
Computer Science
Drilling
Educational objectives
Graphics
Learning
NASA
Prop Design
Pupils
Task analysis
Training
User Study
Virtual Reality
Virtual Training
Visualization
Weight Perception
Title Investigating Whether the Mass of a Tool Replica Influences Virtual Training Learning Outcomes
URI https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10458414
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38437074
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3041499913
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2937701663
https://hal.science/hal-04427994
Volume 30
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1LT6UwFG7UlbPw_bjjI52JKxOu0BZKl8aoV-NjczWubFpa1MwEjBdm4a_3HB43d0xM3BACpdCeU_g-zouQg9D42FuTBtaZBAgKj4PUqCRImefSRsDlPEYjX98koztx-RA_dMHqTSyM975xPvND3G1s-a7MavxVBiscrXpYtnoemFsbrDU1GQDPUK2DoQwYwPTOhBmF6mh8f3IOVJCJIW-KsmB5GJ4KLkMp_vsezT-jN2RTZuVrxNl8ec6WyU3_zK3DyZ9hXdlh9v4pneO3B7VCljoMSo9bpVklc75YIz9mMhOuk8eZ_BvFE4VXNgJFCht6DXCbljk1dFyWfykgePzvRy_6aicTev_yhlEpdNyVn6BdEtcneltXoOF-skHuzk7HJ6OgK8UQZFyqKlBGqtg5m2RO5FLa3AljmDJOucQkWWyZM3HIsLpYmnsOoDFnKmMZ48rCZRHfJAtFWfhtQpUFiCKZMTI0wgqvchl7biM0yAJdEgNy2AtEv7YZN3TDVEKlUZAaBak7QQ7IbxDZtB3myh4dX2k8FgrBpFLiHzTawGmf6a2d8QHZ7UWsu5U70Rx6RRYY8QH5NT0Naw4NKabwZT3RAJGkBKycQJutVjWmnfd69fOLm-6QRRxA6zO5Sxaqt9rvAa6p7H6jzx_PqPFO
linkProvider IEEE
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwEB5BOQAHngUWChjECSlLYjtxfKwqyhZ2l0ta9YRlx05BoAR1Ew78embyWC1IlbhEUeI4jxnH33geH8Cb2IY0OJtHztsMDRSRRrnVWZTzIJRL0JYLlI28WmeLU_nxPD0fk9X7XJgQQh98Fua02_vyfVN2tFSGI5y8ekRbfQMn_jQZ0rW2TgO0NPQQYqgijkB9dGImsX5XnB19QGOQy7noaVmIIEbkUqhYyb9mpOtfKR6yJ1q5GnP2c8_xXVhPTz2EnHyfd62bl7__Kej43691D-6MKJQdDmpzH66F-gHc3qlN-BC-7FTgqC8Y_rQJKjLcsBUCbtZUzLKiaX4wxPC08sdOJr6TDTv7dkl5KawYCSjYWMb1gn3uWtTxsNmH0-P3xdEiGskYolIo3UbaKp1677LSy0opV3lpLdfWa5_ZrEwd9zaNOfGL5VUQCBsrrktecqEdXpaIR7BXN3V4Akw7BCmKW6tiK50MulJpEC4hlywaTHIGbyeBmJ9DzQ3T2yqxNiRIQ4I0oyBn8BpFtm1H1bIXh0tDx2IpudJa_sJG-_TZd3obvvgMDiYRm3HsbozAXskOTMQMXm1P46gjV4qtQ9NtDIIkpRAtZ9jm8aAa284nvXp6xU1fws1FsVqa5cn60zO4RS8zRFAewF572YXniHJa96LX7T-OA_SX
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating+Whether+the+Mass+of+a+Tool+Replica+Influences+Virtual+Training+Learning+Outcomes&rft.jtitle=IEEE+transactions+on+visualization+and+computer+graphics&rft.au=Cauquis%2C+Julien&rft.au=Peillard%2C+Etienne&rft.au=Dominjon%2C+Lionel&rft.au=Duval%2C+Thierry&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.pub=Institute+of+Electrical+and+Electronics+Engineers&rft.issn=1077-2626&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2411&rft.epage=2421&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109%2FTVCG.2024.3372041&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK&rft.externalDocID=oai_HAL_hal_04427994v1
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1077-2626&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1077-2626&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1077-2626&client=summon