Is floral morphology a good predictor of floral visitors to Antirrhineae (snapdragons and relatives)?

The association between plants and flower visitors has been historically proposed as a main factor driving the evolutionary change of both flower and pollinator phenotypes. The considerable diversity in floral morphology within the tribe Antirrhineae has been traditionally related to pollinator type...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPlant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) Vol. 19; no. 4; pp. 515 - 524
Main Authors Guzmán, B, Gómez, J M, Vargas, P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.07.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The association between plants and flower visitors has been historically proposed as a main factor driving the evolutionary change of both flower and pollinator phenotypes. The considerable diversity in floral morphology within the tribe Antirrhineae has been traditionally related to pollinator types. We used empirical data on the flower visitors from 59 Antirrhineae taxa from the literature and our own field surveys, which provide an opportunity to test whether flower phenotypes are reliable predictors of visitors and pollinator niches. The degree of adjustment between eight key floral traits and actual visitors was explored by testing the predictive value of inferred pollinator syndromes (i.e. suites of floral traits that characterise groups of plant species related to pollination). Actual visitors and inferred pollinator niches (categorisation of visitors' association using a modularity algorithm) were also explored using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). The bee pollinator niche is correctly classified for flowers with dull corolla colour, without nectar guides, as the most important predictor. Both predictive value and statistical classification prove useful in classifying Antirrhineae taxa and the bee pollinator niche, mostly as a consequence of the high proportion of genera and taxa with occluded corollas primarily visited by bees. Our predictive approach rendered a high Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of floral traits in the diagnosis of visitors/pollinator niches. In particular, a high PPV was found for bees as both visitors and forming pollinator niches. In addition, LDA showed that four pollinator niches are well defined based on floral traits. The large number of species visited by bees irrespective of pollinator syndromes leads us to hypothesise their generalist pollinator role, despite the phenotypically specialised flowers of Antirrhineae.
AbstractList Abstract The association between plants and flower visitors has been historically proposed as a main factor driving the evolutionary change of both flower and pollinator phenotypes. The considerable diversity in floral morphology within the tribe Antirrhineae has been traditionally related to pollinator types. We used empirical data on the flower visitors from 59 Antirrhineae taxa from the literature and our own field surveys, which provide an opportunity to test whether flower phenotypes are reliable predictors of visitors and pollinator niches. The degree of adjustment between eight key floral traits and actual visitors was explored by testing the predictive value of inferred pollinator syndromes ( i.e . suites of floral traits that characterise groups of plant species related to pollination). Actual visitors and inferred pollinator niches (categorisation of visitors’ association using a modularity algorithm) were also explored using Linear Discriminant Analysis ( LDA ). The bee pollinator niche is correctly classified for flowers with dull corolla colour, without nectar guides, as the most important predictor. Both predictive value and statistical classification prove useful in classifying Antirrhineae taxa and the bee pollinator niche, mostly as a consequence of the high proportion of genera and taxa with occluded corollas primarily visited by bees. Our predictive approach rendered a high Positive Predictive Value ( PPV ) of floral traits in the diagnosis of visitors/pollinator niches. In particular, a high PPV was found for bees as both visitors and forming pollinator niches. In addition, LDA showed that four pollinator niches are well defined based on floral traits. The large number of species visited by bees irrespective of pollinator syndromes leads us to hypothesise their generalist pollinator role, despite the phenotypically specialised flowers of Antirrhineae.
The association between plants and flower visitors has been historically proposed as a main factor driving the evolutionary change of both flower and pollinator phenotypes. The considerable diversity in floral morphology within the tribe Antirrhineae has been traditionally related to pollinator types. We used empirical data on the flower visitors from 59 Antirrhineae taxa from the literature and our own field surveys, which provide an opportunity to test whether flower phenotypes are reliable predictors of visitors and pollinator niches. The degree of adjustment between eight key floral traits and actual visitors was explored by testing the predictive value of inferred pollinator syndromes (i.e. suites of floral traits that characterise groups of plant species related to pollination). Actual visitors and inferred pollinator niches (categorisation of visitors' association using a modularity algorithm) were also explored using Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA). The bee pollinator niche is correctly classified for flowers with dull corolla colour, without nectar guides, as the most important predictor. Both predictive value and statistical classification prove useful in classifying Antirrhineae taxa and the bee pollinator niche, mostly as a consequence of the high proportion of genera and taxa with occluded corollas primarily visited by bees. Our predictive approach rendered a high Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of floral traits in the diagnosis of visitors/pollinator niches. In particular, a high PPV was found for bees as both visitors and forming pollinator niches. In addition, LDA showed that four pollinator niches are well defined based on floral traits. The large number of species visited by bees irrespective of pollinator syndromes leads us to hypothesise their generalist pollinator role, despite the phenotypically specialised flowers of Antirrhineae.
Author Gómez, J M
Guzmán, B
Vargas, P
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: B
  orcidid: 0000-0001-7857-5734
  surname: Guzmán
  fullname: Guzmán, B
  organization: Dpto. de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
– sequence: 2
  givenname: J M
  surname: Gómez
  fullname: Gómez, J M
  organization: Dpto. de Ecología, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
– sequence: 3
  givenname: P
  orcidid: 0000-0003-4502-0382
  surname: Vargas
  fullname: Vargas, P
  organization: Dpto. de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC, Madrid, Spain
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316136$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgE7epB_8BCXjZDpt5SdM2JxnDXzDwoueSpq-z0iY16YT998Yf8-C75Ev48Hh8p2RknUVCLoAtIc5135ZL4DLNjsgEEpEv8jTLRt9ZxszEmExDeGMMEsXghIx5LiAFkU4IPgZat87rlnbO96-udds91XTrXEV7j1VjBuepqw_qowlN_Al0cHRlh8b718aiRjoLVveV11tnA9W2oh5bPTQfGOY3Z-S41m3A89_3lLzc3T6vHxabp_vH9WqzMCJTw4JrKLOkwtpoLkow2nClk5pV0mhlTMkS5GUuJSQyLWOKKjJkKctRIShxSmY_e3vv3ncYhqJrgsG21RbdLhSQZwoUCJ5EevWPvrmdt_G6AhRnUkqe51HNf5TxLgSPddH7ptN-XwArvrovYvfFd_fRXv5u3JUdVn_yULb4BHyVgWU
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_70954_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11101_021_09774_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_16793
crossref_primary_10_26786_1920_7603_2020_609
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_656783
crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_12754
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_15654
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_16823
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13592_020_00765_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s44281_023_00019_y
crossref_primary_10_1080_23818107_2018_1545142
crossref_primary_10_1590_0102_33062021abb0299
Cites_doi 10.1093/aob/mcp031
10.1093/aob/mcl267
10.1007/s00606-004-0216-1
10.1111/2041-210X.12139
10.1111/jbi.12253
10.2307/2261338
10.5962/bhl.title.110054
10.18637/jss.v033.i02
10.1186/s12898-016-0074-z
10.1007/BF00985047
10.1093/jxb/ern009
10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.001515
10.1016/j.ppees.2015.07.003
10.1007/s00606-007-0624-0
10.1111/ele.12224
10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00327.x
10.2307/25027602
10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb08802.x
10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12819.x
10.1201/b18271
10.1371/journal.pone.0087689
10.3732/ajb.90.3.445
10.1093/aob/mct214
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03330.x
10.1080/00222930903383552
10.2307/25027705
10.1371/journal.pone.0039089
10.2307/1929107
10.1007/BF00937433
10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_3
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01915.x
10.1007/s00114-013-1111-9
10.1007/BF01246496
10.1515/9781400838943
10.2307/2269559
10.1111/jeb.12609
10.2307/2528823
10.1098/rstb.2009.0236
10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347
10.26786/1920-7603(2015)17
10.2307/2346669
10.1111/nph.13016
10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00065.x
10.1093/aob/mct105
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2017 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.
2017 German Botanical Society and Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands
Copyright_xml – notice: 2017 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.
– notice: 2017 German Botanical Society and Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QO
8FD
FR3
P64
7X8
DOI 10.1111/plb.12567
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Engineering Research Database
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Engineering Research Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Botany
EISSN 1438-8677
Editor Dafni, A.
Editor_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: A.
  surname: Dafni
  fullname: Dafni, A.
EndPage 524
ExternalDocumentID 10_1111_plb_12567
28316136
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1OC
29O
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHBH
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ATUGU
AUFTA
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
CGR
COF
CS3
CUY
CVF
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DU5
EBD
EBS
ECM
EIF
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
H13
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NPM
O66
O9-
OIG
P2W
P2X
P4D
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIG
RJQFR
ROL
RTC
RX1
SUPJJ
SV3
UB1
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WIH
WIK
WNSPC
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
ZZTAW
~02
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
CITATION
7QO
8FD
FR3
P64
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-2a1b74defca23b1cac29a4f0d5ca9ccb04e2b8551456b2b8a233b1e0608e9e193
ISSN 1435-8603
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 08:09:14 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 16:26:24 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 00:47:52 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 08:49:02 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords ornithophily
pollination syndromes
pollinator niches
multivariate analysis
Floral diversity
melittophily
Language English
License 2017 German Botanical Society and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c379t-2a1b74defca23b1cac29a4f0d5ca9ccb04e2b8551456b2b8a233b1e0608e9e193
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-4502-0382
0000-0001-7857-5734
PMID 28316136
PQID 1920555288
PQPubID 2045112
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1879191324
proquest_journals_1920555288
crossref_primary_10_1111_plb_12567
pubmed_primary_28316136
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)
PublicationTitleAlternate Plant Biol (Stuttg)
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References e_1_2_7_5_1
e_1_2_7_3_1
Waser N.M. (e_1_2_7_57_1) 2006
Darwin C.R. (e_1_2_7_6_1) 1877
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_17_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_41_1
e_1_2_7_13_1
e_1_2_7_43_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_45_1
e_1_2_7_47_1
e_1_2_7_26_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
e_1_2_7_50_1
e_1_2_7_25_1
e_1_2_7_31_1
e_1_2_7_52_1
Faegri K. (e_1_2_7_14_1) 1979
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_33_1
e_1_2_7_54_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
Sutton D.A. (e_1_2_7_49_1) 1988
Delpino F (e_1_2_7_7_1) 1868; 11
e_1_2_7_37_1
e_1_2_7_58_1
e_1_2_7_39_1
Oksanen J. (e_1_2_7_35_1) 2013
Knuth P. (e_1_2_7_27_1) 1906
DePamphilis C.W. (e_1_2_7_8_1) 1994; 81
Wilson P. (e_1_2_7_60_1) 2006
Cane J.H. (e_1_2_7_4_1) 2006
e_1_2_7_18_1
Waser N.M. (e_1_2_7_56_1) 2006
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_40_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_12_1
e_1_2_7_44_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_46_1
e_1_2_7_48_1
e_1_2_7_29_1
Proctor M. (e_1_2_7_42_1) 1996
DeShea L. (e_1_2_7_9_1) 2015
e_1_2_7_51_1
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_53_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_32_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_34_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
e_1_2_7_36_1
e_1_2_7_59_1
e_1_2_7_38_1
Vogel S. (e_1_2_7_55_1) 1954; 1
References_xml – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1
  doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp031
– ident: e_1_2_7_45_1
  doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl267
– ident: e_1_2_7_51_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00606-004-0216-1
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12139
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_53_1
  doi: 10.1111/jbi.12253
– ident: e_1_2_7_36_1
  doi: 10.2307/2261338
– start-page: 366
  volume-title: The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species
  year: 1877
  ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.110054
  contributor:
    fullname: Darwin C.R.
– start-page: 445
  volume-title: Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_7_57_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Waser N.M.
– volume-title: Handbook of flower pollination
  year: 1906
  ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Knuth P.
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.18637/jss.v033.i02
– ident: e_1_2_7_32_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12898-016-0074-z
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00985047
– volume: 81
  start-page: 152
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  article-title: Tribal relationships in the Scrophulariaceae subfamily Antirrhinoideae: Insights from sequence variation of the plastid‐encoded gene rps2
  publication-title: American Journal of Botany Supplementum
  contributor:
    fullname: DePamphilis C.W.
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern009
– ident: e_1_2_7_48_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.01.110170.001515
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ppees.2015.07.003
– volume: 11
  start-page: 265
  year: 1868
  ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  article-title: Uteriori osservazioni e considerazioni sulla dicogamia nel regno vegetale
  publication-title: Atti della Societa Italiana di Science Naturali Milano
  contributor:
    fullname: Delpino F
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00606-007-0624-0
– ident: e_1_2_7_44_1
  doi: 10.1111/ele.12224
– ident: e_1_2_7_46_1
– ident: e_1_2_7_47_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00327.x
– start-page: 575
  volume-title: A revision of the tribe Antirrhineae
  year: 1988
  ident: e_1_2_7_49_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Sutton D.A.
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.2307/25027602
– ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1988.tb08802.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_54_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
– volume-title: vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.0‐8
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_7_35_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Oksanen J.
– ident: e_1_2_7_59_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12819.x
– start-page: 47
  volume-title: Plant–pollinator interactions. From specialization to generalization
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_7_60_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Wilson P.
– volume-title: Introductory statistics for the health sciences
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1201/b18271
  contributor:
    fullname: DeShea L.
– ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087689
– ident: e_1_2_7_41_1
  doi: 10.3732/ajb.90.3.445
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.1093/aob/mct214
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03330.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_52_1
  doi: 10.1080/00222930903383552
– ident: e_1_2_7_50_1
  doi: 10.2307/25027705
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039089
– ident: e_1_2_7_43_1
  doi: 10.2307/1929107
– ident: e_1_2_7_40_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00937433
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_3
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01915.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00114-013-1111-9
– ident: e_1_2_7_33_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF01246496
– volume-title: Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_7_56_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Waser N.M.
– ident: e_1_2_7_58_1
  doi: 10.1515/9781400838943
– volume-title: The principles of pollination ecology
  year: 1979
  ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Faegri K.
– ident: e_1_2_7_34_1
  doi: 10.2307/2269559
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  doi: 10.1111/jeb.12609
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.2307/2528823
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0236
– volume-title: The natural history of pollination
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_7_42_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Proctor M.
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132347
– ident: e_1_2_7_38_1
  doi: 10.26786/1920-7603(2015)17
– start-page: 99
  volume-title: Plant–pollinator interactions: from specialization to generalization
  year: 2006
  ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Cane J.H.
– ident: e_1_2_7_39_1
  doi: 10.2307/2346669
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1111/nph.13016
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2000.tb00065.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  doi: 10.1093/aob/mct105
– volume: 1
  start-page: 1
  year: 1954
  ident: e_1_2_7_55_1
  article-title: Blütenbiologische typen als elemente der Sippengliederung, dargestellt anhand der Flora Südafrikas
  publication-title: Botanische Studien
  contributor:
    fullname: Vogel S.
SSID ssj0014901
Score 2.2657151
Snippet The association between plants and flower visitors has been historically proposed as a main factor driving the evolutionary change of both flower and...
Abstract The association between plants and flower visitors has been historically proposed as a main factor driving the evolutionary change of both flower and...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 515
SubjectTerms Animals
Antirrhinum - physiology
Bees
Bees - physiology
Classification
Discriminant analysis
Disorders
Empirical analysis
Flowers
Flowers - physiology
Genera
Historical account
Modularity
Morphology
Multivariate Analysis
Nectar
Niches
Plant populations
Pollination
Pollination - physiology
Pollinators
Taxa
Title Is floral morphology a good predictor of floral visitors to Antirrhineae (snapdragons and relatives)?
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28316136
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1920555288
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1879191324
Volume 19
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELagcOCCeLNQkEEcQKtUeSc-oRZBHxIcoEW9RbbjLEjdJEq8SO2vZ8ZOvOmKlYBLFNnORpr5dvKNPQ9C3viJSMFr4B7jqfLisgo8LrLIywVTIst4kvmYjfz5S3p0Fp-cJ-cb2SVa7MmrP-aV_I9WYQz0ilmy_6BZ96MwAPegX7iChuH6Vzo-7ufVhUmxXzYgr6Gc0nyBlYrbDo9gwKNGOjiswkRy010HCOd-rX923Q8gmdzQzL7mbdnxBYbOmJhzEyX3C60I24j-w0ZHej6Wb4Jnv-mV1gtus38O0dbXl5MthsPV1dIcyAe2N7wbx8GDaGk3sU_WG7Pfsftuv84-G3YlgsxFsMJHxVrSGCwpFsu7ZmrZBFLxxG4mNqdziz1vL8QeEDHbt2Oi13ZpFAsMCXhrtFFR23yjx6mb5FaIlQCRNX919cXAO_SDodwUhne592CJ6OHJ63xlixNiyMjpPXJ38CLovoXEfXJD1Q_I7YMGmP7lQ6KOe2o1Tte4oJwiLqjDBW2qcdWIC6obOsUFfTtBBQVUUIeKd-8fkbNPH08_HHlDOw1PRhnTXsgDkcWlqiQPIxFILkPG48ovE8mZlMKPVShyZNBJKuAOVsEy5ad-rpgCov-Y7NRNrZ4SmuZhlYYcfHeh4jyVXJVAQ2UMnlrEeMlm5PUotKK1VVOK0dsEIRdGyDOyO4qzGP5UfQEOB5agC_N8Rl65aTB5eI7Fa9WsYE2esYAF4ArMyBOrBveWUW3Pts48J3fWgN0lO7pbqRdALLV4acDxGwQrd-I
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,27937,27938
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is+floral+morphology+a+good+predictor+of+floral+visitors+to+Antirrhineae+%28snapdragons+and+relatives%29%3F&rft.jtitle=Plant+biology+%28Stuttgart%2C+Germany%29&rft.au=Guzm%C3%A1n%2C+B&rft.au=G%C3%B3mez%2C+J+M&rft.au=Vargas%2C+P&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.eissn=1438-8677&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=515&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fplb.12567&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F28316136&rft.externalDocID=28316136
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1435-8603&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1435-8603&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1435-8603&client=summon