Comparison of Dynamic Contour Tonometry with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry

• Published in: Investigative ophthalmology & visual science Vol. 45; no. 9; pp. 3118 - 3121
• Main Authors: Kaufmann, Claude, Bachmann, Lucas M, Thiel, Michael A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Rockville, MD ARVO 01.09.2004; Association for Research in Vision and Ophtalmology
• Subjects: Anesthesia; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy; Astigmatism - physiopathology; Biological and medical sciences; Corneal Topography; Humans; Intraocular Pressure; Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment); Medical sciences; Multivariate Analysis; Observer Variation; Prospective Studies; Reference Values; Reproducibility of Results; Tonometry, Ocular - methods; Ophthalmology; Contour; Dynamics; Comparative study; Applanation tonometry
• ISSN: 0146-0404; 1552-5783; 1552-5783
• DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0018

The dynamic contour tonometer (DCT; Pascal tonometer) is a novel tonometer designed to measure intraocular pressure (IOP) independent of corneal properties. The purpose of this study was a comparison of the DCT with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) with respect to mean of IOP readings, the influence of ocular structural factors on IOP readings, and both intra- and interobserver variability, in a large group of healthy subjects. In a prospective study of 228 eyes, IOP measurements by GAT and DCT were compared, and the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, axial length, and anterior chamber depth were analyzed. To evaluate intra- and interobserver variability, IOP was measured in eight eyes by four observers. There was a high concordance between the IOP readings obtained by DCT and GAT. However, IOP readings were consistently higher with DCT than with GAT (median difference: +1.7 mm Hg, interquartile range [25th-75th percentile] = 0.8-2.7 mm Hg). In contrast to GAT, multivariable regression analysis showed no significant effect of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, astigmatism, anterior chamber depth, and axial length on DCT readings. For repeated measurements the intraobserver variability was 0.65 mm Hg for the DCT and 1.1 mm Hg for the GAT (P = 0.008). Interobserver variability was 0.44 mm Hg for the DCT and 1.28 mm Hg for the GAT (P = 0.017). IOP measurements by DCT are highly concordant with IOP readings obtained from GAT but do not vary in CCT and have a lower intra- and interobserver variability. DCT seems to be an appropriate method of tonometry for routine clinical use.