Understanding the Relationship between Incentive Design and Participation in U.S. Workplace Wellness Programs

• Published in: American journal of health promotion Vol. 30; no. 3; pp. 198 - 203
• Main Authors: Batorsky, Benjamin, Taylor, Erin, Huang, Crystal, Liu, Hangsheng, Mattke, Soeren
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.01.2016; American Journal of Health Promotion
• Subjects: Adult; Attitude to Health; Community Participation - psychology; Cross-Sectional Studies; Employee involvement; Employees; Employers; Female; Generalized linear models; Health promotion; Health Promotion - organization & administration; Humans; Incentives; Linear analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Motivation; Penalties; Polls & surveys; Random sampling; Rewards; Surveys and Questionnaires; United States; Wellness programs; Workplace - psychology; Workplaces; United States > US; Strategy: behavior change; Cross-Sectional Studies; Manuscript format: research; Outcome measure: behavioral; Research purpose: relationship testing; Workplace; Health focus: general health; Prevention Research; Target population age: adults; Health Promotion; Motivation; Target population circumstances: geographic location; Setting: workplace; Study design: nonexperimental
• ISSN: 0890-1171; 2168-6602; 2168-6602
• DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.150210-QUAN-718

Purpose. We aimed to understand how employer characteristics relate to the use of incentives to promote participation in wellness programs and to explore the relationship between incentive type and participation rates. Design. A cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative survey data combined with an administrative business database was employed. Settings/Subjects. Random sampling of U.S. companies within strata based on industry and number of employees was used to determine a final sample of 3000 companies. Of these, 19% returned completed surveys. Measures. The survey asked about employee participation rate, incentive type, and gender composition of employees. Incentive types included any incentives, high-value rewards, and rewards plus penalties. Analysis. Logistic regressions of incentive type on employer characteristics were used to determine what types of employers are more likely to offer which type of incentives. A generalized linear model of participation rate was used to determine the relationship between incentive type and participation. Results. Employers located in the Northeast were 5 to 10 times more likely to offer incentives. Employers with a large number of employees, particularly female employees, were up to 1.25 times more likely to use penalties. Penalty and high-value incentives were associated with participation rates of 68% and 52%, respectively. Conclusion. Industry or regional characteristics are likely determinants of incentive use for wellness programs. Penalties appear to be effective, but attention should be paid to what types of employees they affect.