Sea lice removal by cleaner fish in salmon aquaculture a review of the evidence base

Stocking cleaner fish to control sea lice infestations in Atlantic salmon farms is widespread and is viewed as a salmon welfare-friendly alternative to current delousing control treatments. The escalating demand for cleaner fish (~60 million stocked worldwide per year), coupled with evidence that th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAquaculture Environment Interactions Vol. 12; pp. 31 - 44
Main Authors Overton, Kathy, Barrett, Luke T., Oppedal, Frode, Kristiansen, Tore S., Dempster, Tim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oldendorf Inter-Research Science Center 01.01.2020
Inter-Research
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1869-215X
1869-7534
DOI10.3354/aei00345

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Stocking cleaner fish to control sea lice infestations in Atlantic salmon farms is widespread and is viewed as a salmon welfare-friendly alternative to current delousing control treatments. The escalating demand for cleaner fish (~60 million stocked worldwide per year), coupled with evidence that they experience poor welfare and high mortality in sea cages, requires that the lice removal effect of cleaner fish be substantiated by robust evidence. Here, we systematically ana lysed (1) studies that tested the delousing efficacy of cleaner fish species in tanks or sea cages and (2) studies of spatial overlap—and therefore likely encounter rate—between cleaner fish and salmon when stocked together in sea cages. Only 11 studies compared lice removal between tanks or cages with and without cleaner fish using a replicated experimental design. Most studies had insufficient replication (1 or 2 replicates) and were conducted in small-scale tanks or cages, which does not reflect the large volume and deep cages in which they are deployed commercially. Reported efficacies varied across species and experimental scale: from a 28% increase to a 100% reduction in lice numbers when cleaner fish were used. Further, our review revealed that the interaction of cleaner fish and salmon in sea cages has rarely been documented. While much of the evidence is promising, there is a mismatch between the current evidence and the extent of use by the industry. We recommend replicated studies in 9 key areas at a full commercial scale across all species that are currently widely used. More targeted, evidence-based use of cleaner fish should increase their efficacy and help to alleviate economic, environmental, and ethical concerns.
AbstractList Stocking cleaner fish to control sea lice infestations in Atlantic salmon farms is widespread and is viewed as a salmon welfare-friendly alternative to current delousing control treatments. The escalating demand for cleaner fish (~60 million stocked worldwide per year), coupled with evidence that they experience poor welfare and high mortality in sea cages, requires that the lice removal effect of cleaner fish be substantiated by robust evidence. Here, we systematically analysed (1) studies that tested the delousing efficacy of cleaner fish species in tanks or sea cages and (2) studies of spatial overlap—and therefore likely encounter rate—between cleaner fish and salmon when stocked together in sea cages. Only 11 studies compared lice removal between tanks or cages with and without cleaner fish using a replicated experimental design. Most studies had insufficient replication (1 or 2 replicates) and were conducted in small-scale tanks or cages, which does not reflect the large volume and deep cages in which they are deployed commercially. Reported efficacies varied across species and experimental scale: from a 28% increase to a 100% reduction in lice numbers when cleaner fish were used. Further, our review revealed that the interaction of cleaner fish and salmon in sea cages has rarely been documented. While much of the evidence is promising, there is a mismatch between the current evidence and the extent of use by the industry. We recommend replicated studies in 9 key areas at a full commercial scale across all species that are currently widely used. More targeted, evidence-based use of cleaner fish should increase their efficacy and help to alleviate economic, environmental, and ethical concerns.
Stocking cleaner fish to control sea lice infestations in Atlantic salmon farms is widespread and is viewed as a salmon welfare-friendly alternative to current delousing control treatments. The escalating demand for cleaner fish (~60 million stocked worldwide per year), coupled with evidence that they experience poor welfare and high mortality in sea cages, requires that the lice removal effect of cleaner fish be substantiated by robust evidence. Here, we systematically ana lysed (1) studies that tested the delousing efficacy of cleaner fish species in tanks or sea cages and (2) studies of spatial overlap—and therefore likely encounter rate—between cleaner fish and salmon when stocked together in sea cages. Only 11 studies compared lice removal between tanks or cages with and without cleaner fish using a replicated experimental design. Most studies had insufficient replication (1 or 2 replicates) and were conducted in small-scale tanks or cages, which does not reflect the large volume and deep cages in which they are deployed commercially. Reported efficacies varied across species and experimental scale: from a 28% increase to a 100% reduction in lice numbers when cleaner fish were used. Further, our review revealed that the interaction of cleaner fish and salmon in sea cages has rarely been documented. While much of the evidence is promising, there is a mismatch between the current evidence and the extent of use by the industry. We recommend replicated studies in 9 key areas at a full commercial scale across all species that are currently widely used. More targeted, evidence-based use of cleaner fish should increase their efficacy and help to alleviate economic, environmental, and ethical concerns.
Author Overton, Kathy
Barrett, Luke T.
Kristiansen, Tore S.
Oppedal, Frode
Dempster, Tim
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kathy
  surname: Overton
  fullname: Overton, Kathy
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Luke T.
  surname: Barrett
  fullname: Barrett, Luke T.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Frode
  surname: Oppedal
  fullname: Oppedal, Frode
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Tore S.
  surname: Kristiansen
  fullname: Kristiansen, Tore S.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Tim
  surname: Dempster
  fullname: Dempster, Tim
BookMark eNptkMtKA0EQRRtRMMaAPyAMuHGT2O_pLCX4CARcqOCuqemHdphMJ90zQv7e0SQuRGpRRdW5l0udoeMmNg6hC4InjAl-Ay5gzLg4QgOi5HRcCsaP9zMl4u0UjXJeYowJFaIs1QDJZwdFHYwrklvFT6iLaluY2kHjUuFD_ihCU2SoV7EpYNOB6eq2S-4cnXiosxvt-xC93t-9zB7Hi6eH-ex2MTasLNsxUd5I5bkVlDhpJfVeVtaC9Jx6IyQDqwwzleSiPxtSuZKCV1QwN-VWYTZE852vjbDU6xRWkLY6QtA_i5jeNaQ29IE15bSSAhTnWHLSm9q-lFMWhHfYQO91tfNap7jpXG71Mnap6eNryqZccKwY76nJjjIp5pyc1ya00IbYtAlCrQnW36_Wh1f3gus_gkPMf9DLHbrMbUy_HJXTklPC2Bdh5IlP
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_fishes7050220
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738967
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12625
crossref_primary_10_3390_fishes8090455
crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines9080819
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2024_106405
crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_15482
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12589
crossref_primary_10_3354_aei00385
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12620
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2024_741901
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2024_741267
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpara_2019_12_005
crossref_primary_10_3390_genes14101870
crossref_primary_10_3354_aei00348
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmars_2021_701793
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2020_735623
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738817
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cbd_2025_101433
crossref_primary_10_1111_cobi_14065
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2021_737066
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2021_105459
crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_15352
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2025_106512
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2023_739557
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolecon_2024_108359
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12470
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_93874_6
crossref_primary_10_3390_fishes9090336
crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2021_768558
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_epidem_2021_100508
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738544
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12528
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2023_739240
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12639_024_01775_y
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2023_739884
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2022_110149
crossref_primary_10_1111_jwas_13089
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2023_740274
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2021_105275
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2021_737202
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4100988
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738556
crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_14761
crossref_primary_10_1111_jiec_13118
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2020_736212
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_17149
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12456
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_7618
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpara_2020_05_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpara_2024_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12498
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2020_735160
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aqrep_2023_101661
crossref_primary_10_1111_are_14805
crossref_primary_10_3354_aei00439
crossref_primary_10_1093_conphys_coae068
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygeno_2023_110721
crossref_primary_10_3390_fishes8020083
crossref_primary_10_3354_aei00436
Cites_doi 10.1111/jwas.12099
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.03.032
10.1098/rspb.2012.2359
10.1098/rsos.171752
10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00004.x
10.1080/17451000.2016.1262042
10.1111/raq.12299
10.1111/raq.12194
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.02.014
10.1111/j.1095-8649.1983.tb02921.x
10.1016/0044-8486(94)00331-H
10.1016/j.seares.2013.02.009
10.3989/scimar.2011.75n4759
10.3354/dao060123
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.11.020
10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01083.x
10.1242/bio.036079
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734224
10.7717/peerj.4837
10.1371/journal.pone.0073539
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.10.048
10.1242/bio.036301
10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
10.1016/0044-8486(95)01245-1
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.05.024
10.1016/0044-8486(94)90337-9
10.1017/CBO9780511806384
10.1046/j.1365-2761.2000.00225.x
10.1139/cjfas-2014-0169
10.1111/jfd.12937
10.1139/z83-105
10.1080/17451000.2013.810760
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.069
10.1016/j.pt.2014.12.006
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.08.015
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.002
10.1002/ps.3692
10.1016/j.pt.2006.08.006
10.1111/j.1365-2761.2008.01011.x
10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.06.003
10.1007/s10164-014-0397-1
10.1371/journal.pone.0119645
10.1093/icesjms/fsx090
10.1002/ps.4560
10.1007/s12562-017-1110-4
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.01.026
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.02.045
10.1111/jfd.12017
10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.05.007
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.06.008
10.1111/faf.12198
10.1136/vr.104966
10.1242/jeb.151183
10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.02.037
10.1002/ps.509
10.1371/journal.pone.0163052
10.1111/1749-4877.12186
10.1111/jfd.12731
10.1242/jeb.154021
10.1111/jfd.12061
10.2307/2389612
10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.02.001
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The authors 2020
Copyright Ecology Institute 2020
Copyright_xml – notice: The authors 2020
– notice: Copyright Ecology Institute 2020
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7QG
7SN
7SS
7ST
7TN
C1K
F1W
H9R
SOI
DOA
DOI 10.3354/aei00345
DatabaseName CrossRef
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Environment Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Illustrata: Natural Sciences
Environment Abstracts
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Entomology Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
Animal Behavior Abstracts
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
ProQuest Illustrata: Natural Sciences
Ecology Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList

Entomology Abstracts
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
Economics
EISSN 1869-7534
EndPage 44
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_242b65a84406413cbdbdb8e8da5fe0ca
10_3354_aei00345
26974213
GroupedDBID 5VS
AAEFR
AAFWJ
ABBHK
ABXSQ
ACPRK
ADBBV
ADULT
AEKFB
AENEX
AEUPB
AFPKN
AFRAH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
EBS
EJD
GROUPED_DOAJ
IZHOT
JENOY
JPL
JST
KQ8
OK1
PX8
RIR
SA0
SWMRO
TR2
AAYXX
CITATION
7QG
7SN
7SS
7ST
7TN
C1K
F1W
H9R
SOI
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-18fc68f4d521e6d62ff6bdda6f42fc563ad8c3cb645e6dc1be72af8253e94d803
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1869-215X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:50 EDT 2025
Fri Aug 29 17:08:59 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:23 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:40:58 EDT 2025
Thu May 29 13:18:41 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c377t-18fc68f4d521e6d62ff6bdda6f42fc563ad8c3cb645e6dc1be72af8253e94d803
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/242b65a84406413cbdbdb8e8da5fe0ca
PQID 2394540834
PQPubID 2048275
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_242b65a84406413cbdbdb8e8da5fe0ca
proquest_journals_2394540834
crossref_citationtrail_10_3354_aei00345
crossref_primary_10_3354_aei00345
jstor_primary_26974213
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Oldendorf
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oldendorf
PublicationTitle Aquaculture Environment Interactions
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher Inter-Research Science Center
Inter-Research
Publisher_xml – name: Inter-Research Science Center
– name: Inter-Research
References Ref9
Ref43
Ref44
Ref7
Ref41
Ref8
Ref42
Ref5
Ref47
Ref6
Ref48
Ref3
Ref45
Ref4
Ref46
Ref49
Ref40
Ref32
Ref33
Ref30
Ref74
Ref31
Ref36
Ref37
Ref34
Ref35
Ref38
Ref39
Ref1
Ref2
Ref72
Ref73
Ref70
Ref71
Ref21
Ref65
Ref22
Ref66
Ref63
Ref20
Ref64
Ref25
Ref69
Ref26
Ref23
Ref67
Ref24
Ref68
Ref29
Ref27
Ref28
Ref61
Ref62
Ref60
Ref10
Ref54
Ref11
Ref55
Ref52
Ref53
Ref14
Ref58
Ref15
Ref59
Ref12
Ref56
Ref13
Ref57
Ref18
Ref19
Ref16
Ref17
Ref50
Ref51
References_xml – ident: Ref67
  doi: 10.1111/jwas.12099
– ident: Ref39
– ident: Ref54
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.03.032
– ident: Ref16
– ident: Ref35
  doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2359
– ident: Ref41
– ident: Ref2
– ident: Ref14
  doi: 10.1098/rsos.171752
– ident: Ref53
  doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00004.x
– ident: Ref22
  doi: 10.1080/17451000.2016.1262042
– ident: Ref48
  doi: 10.1111/raq.12299
– ident: Ref50
  doi: 10.1111/raq.12194
– ident: Ref60
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.02.014
– ident: Ref3
  doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1983.tb02921.x
– ident: Ref12
  doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(94)00331-H
– ident: Ref70
  doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2013.02.009
– ident: Ref49
  doi: 10.3989/scimar.2011.75n4759
– ident: Ref19
  doi: 10.3354/dao060123
– ident: Ref45
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.11.020
– ident: Ref59
  doi: 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01083.x
– ident: Ref25
  doi: 10.1242/bio.036079
– ident: Ref32
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734224
– ident: Ref34
  doi: 10.7717/peerj.4837
– ident: Ref23
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073539
– ident: Ref29
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.10.048
– ident: Ref31
  doi: 10.1242/bio.036301
– ident: Ref40
– ident: Ref8
  doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001
– ident: Ref44
– ident: Ref68
  doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(95)01245-1
– ident: Ref37
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.05.024
– ident: Ref64
  doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(94)90337-9
– ident: Ref51
  doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511806384
– ident: Ref5
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2000.00225.x
– ident: Ref26
– ident: Ref33
  doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0169
– ident: Ref58
  doi: 10.1111/jfd.12937
– ident: Ref66
– ident: Ref11
  doi: 10.1139/z83-105
– ident: Ref55
  doi: 10.1080/17451000.2013.810760
– ident: Ref43
– ident: Ref21
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.069
– ident: Ref1
  doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.12.006
– ident: Ref30
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.08.015
– ident: Ref73
  doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.002
– ident: Ref36
  doi: 10.1002/ps.3692
– ident: Ref9
  doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.08.006
– ident: Ref57
– ident: Ref10
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2008.01011.x
– ident: Ref15
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.06.003
– ident: Ref27
  doi: 10.1007/s10164-014-0397-1
– ident: Ref62
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119645
– ident: Ref71
  doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsx090
– ident: Ref47
  doi: 10.1002/ps.4560
– ident: Ref17
  doi: 10.1007/s12562-017-1110-4
– ident: Ref13
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.01.026
– ident: Ref61
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.02.045
– ident: Ref20
  doi: 10.1111/jfd.12017
– ident: Ref38
– ident: Ref74
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.05.007
– ident: Ref28
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.06.008
– ident: Ref69
  doi: 10.1111/faf.12198
– ident: Ref6
  doi: 10.1136/vr.104966
– ident: Ref7
  doi: 10.1242/jeb.151183
– ident: Ref46
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.02.037
– ident: Ref65
  doi: 10.1002/ps.509
– ident: Ref18
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163052
– ident: Ref52
  doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12186
– ident: Ref4
  doi: 10.1111/jfd.12731
– ident: Ref24
  doi: 10.1242/jeb.154021
– ident: Ref63
  doi: 10.1111/jfd.12061
– ident: Ref56
– ident: Ref72
  doi: 10.2307/2389612
– ident: Ref42
  doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.02.001
SSID ssj0001255778
Score 2.407745
Snippet Stocking cleaner fish to control sea lice infestations in Atlantic salmon farms is widespread and is viewed as a salmon welfare-friendly alternative to current...
SourceID doaj
proquest
crossref
jstor
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 31
SubjectTerms Aquaculture
Cages
Crustaceans
Design of experiments
Economics
Experimental design
Farms
Fish
Fish culture
Fish stocking
Freshwater fishes
Lice
Marine fishes
Removal
Restocking
Salmo salar
Salmon
Species
Tanks
Subtitle a review of the evidence base
Title Sea lice removal by cleaner fish in salmon aquaculture
URI https://www.jstor.org/stable/26974213
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2394540834
https://doaj.org/article/242b65a84406413cbdbdb8e8da5fe0ca
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA7Skx7EV7G-iCB4WtzmtVlvKpYi6EULvS2TlxbqVvs4-O-d7G6LouBF9raZfTCT5JsJyfcRcpZFOVtr84QFJhMRMpMYrMAS7hSk0BVOp_Gg8P2D6g_E3VAOv0h9xT1hNT1w7bgLhBCjJGiByIMTrjUOL-21Axl8aqvUCDHvSzFVr65ImVXTcJRcShDXhjXzLOdSXIAfRV4W-Q2LKsr-5a7EHzNzBTe9LbLZ5In0qv6_bbLmyx2ycfU8bbgy_C4ZPHqgYxzodOpfJ9hjqPmgaAyln9Iwmr3QUUlnMMaORuF9Ac2DlxRofWCFTgLF_I_6RlmURkjbI4Pe7dNNP2lUEhLLs2yedHWwSgfhEIi9coqFoIxzoIJgwUrFwWmLflNCYrPtGp8xCFgYcp_HUPA2aZWT0u8TKnKeq-BACIdj2VswLs0hZU5lNtNgOuR86a_CNhTiUcliXGApET1bLD3bIacry7eaNuMXm-vo8lV7JLqubmD4iyb8xV_h75B2FbDVW5jCCol1eYccLSNYNMNyVkQdeExRNRcH__HxQ7LOYvldrcgckdZ8uvDHmKPMzUnVHT8B-GjkcQ
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sea+lice+removal+by+cleaner+fish+in+salmon+aquaculture%3A+a+review+of+the+evidence+base&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture+Environment+Interactions&rft.au=Overton%2C+K&rft.au=Barrett%2C+LT&rft.au=Oppedal%2C+F&rft.au=Kristiansen%2C+TS&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.issn=1869-215X&rft.eissn=1869-7534&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=44&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354%2Faei00345&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3354_aei00345
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1869-215X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1869-215X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1869-215X&client=summon