Sea lice removal by cleaner fish in salmon aquaculture a review of the evidence base
Stocking cleaner fish to control sea lice infestations in Atlantic salmon farms is widespread and is viewed as a salmon welfare-friendly alternative to current delousing control treatments. The escalating demand for cleaner fish (~60 million stocked worldwide per year), coupled with evidence that th...
Saved in:
Published in | Aquaculture Environment Interactions Vol. 12; pp. 31 - 44 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oldendorf
Inter-Research Science Center
01.01.2020
Inter-Research |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1869-215X 1869-7534 |
DOI | 10.3354/aei00345 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Stocking cleaner fish to control sea lice infestations in Atlantic salmon farms is widespread and is viewed as a salmon welfare-friendly alternative to current delousing control treatments. The escalating demand for cleaner fish (~60 million stocked worldwide per year), coupled with evidence that they experience poor welfare and high mortality in sea cages, requires that the lice removal effect of cleaner fish be substantiated by robust evidence. Here, we systematically ana lysed (1) studies that tested the delousing efficacy of cleaner fish species in tanks or sea cages and (2) studies of spatial overlap—and therefore likely encounter rate—between cleaner fish and salmon when stocked together in sea cages. Only 11 studies compared lice removal between tanks or cages with and without cleaner fish using a replicated experimental design. Most studies had insufficient replication (1 or 2 replicates) and were conducted in small-scale tanks or cages, which does not reflect the large volume and deep cages in which they are deployed commercially. Reported efficacies varied across species and experimental scale: from a 28% increase to a 100% reduction in lice numbers when cleaner fish were used. Further, our review revealed that the interaction of cleaner fish and salmon in sea cages has rarely been documented. While much of the evidence is promising, there is a mismatch between the current evidence and the extent of use by the industry. We recommend replicated studies in 9 key areas at a full commercial scale across all species that are currently widely used. More targeted, evidence-based use of cleaner fish should increase their efficacy and help to alleviate economic, environmental, and ethical concerns. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Stocking cleaner fish to control sea lice infestations in Atlantic salmon farms is widespread and is viewed as a salmon welfare-friendly alternative to current delousing control treatments. The escalating demand for cleaner fish (~60 million stocked worldwide per year), coupled with evidence that they experience poor welfare and high mortality in sea cages, requires that the lice removal effect of cleaner fish be substantiated by robust evidence. Here, we systematically analysed (1) studies that tested the delousing efficacy of cleaner fish species in tanks or sea cages and (2) studies of spatial overlap—and therefore likely encounter rate—between cleaner fish and salmon when stocked together in sea cages. Only 11 studies compared lice removal between tanks or cages with and without cleaner fish using a replicated experimental design. Most studies had insufficient replication (1 or 2 replicates) and were conducted in small-scale tanks or cages, which does not reflect the large volume and deep cages in which they are deployed commercially. Reported efficacies varied across species and experimental scale: from a 28% increase to a 100% reduction in lice numbers when cleaner fish were used. Further, our review revealed that the interaction of cleaner fish and salmon in sea cages has rarely been documented. While much of the evidence is promising, there is a mismatch between the current evidence and the extent of use by the industry. We recommend replicated studies in 9 key areas at a full commercial scale across all species that are currently widely used. More targeted, evidence-based use of cleaner fish should increase their efficacy and help to alleviate economic, environmental, and ethical concerns. Stocking cleaner fish to control sea lice infestations in Atlantic salmon farms is widespread and is viewed as a salmon welfare-friendly alternative to current delousing control treatments. The escalating demand for cleaner fish (~60 million stocked worldwide per year), coupled with evidence that they experience poor welfare and high mortality in sea cages, requires that the lice removal effect of cleaner fish be substantiated by robust evidence. Here, we systematically ana lysed (1) studies that tested the delousing efficacy of cleaner fish species in tanks or sea cages and (2) studies of spatial overlap—and therefore likely encounter rate—between cleaner fish and salmon when stocked together in sea cages. Only 11 studies compared lice removal between tanks or cages with and without cleaner fish using a replicated experimental design. Most studies had insufficient replication (1 or 2 replicates) and were conducted in small-scale tanks or cages, which does not reflect the large volume and deep cages in which they are deployed commercially. Reported efficacies varied across species and experimental scale: from a 28% increase to a 100% reduction in lice numbers when cleaner fish were used. Further, our review revealed that the interaction of cleaner fish and salmon in sea cages has rarely been documented. While much of the evidence is promising, there is a mismatch between the current evidence and the extent of use by the industry. We recommend replicated studies in 9 key areas at a full commercial scale across all species that are currently widely used. More targeted, evidence-based use of cleaner fish should increase their efficacy and help to alleviate economic, environmental, and ethical concerns. |
Author | Overton, Kathy Barrett, Luke T. Kristiansen, Tore S. Oppedal, Frode Dempster, Tim |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kathy surname: Overton fullname: Overton, Kathy – sequence: 2 givenname: Luke T. surname: Barrett fullname: Barrett, Luke T. – sequence: 3 givenname: Frode surname: Oppedal fullname: Oppedal, Frode – sequence: 4 givenname: Tore S. surname: Kristiansen fullname: Kristiansen, Tore S. – sequence: 5 givenname: Tim surname: Dempster fullname: Dempster, Tim |
BookMark | eNptkMtKA0EQRRtRMMaAPyAMuHGT2O_pLCX4CARcqOCuqemHdphMJ90zQv7e0SQuRGpRRdW5l0udoeMmNg6hC4InjAl-Ay5gzLg4QgOi5HRcCsaP9zMl4u0UjXJeYowJFaIs1QDJZwdFHYwrklvFT6iLaluY2kHjUuFD_ihCU2SoV7EpYNOB6eq2S-4cnXiosxvt-xC93t-9zB7Hi6eH-ex2MTasLNsxUd5I5bkVlDhpJfVeVtaC9Jx6IyQDqwwzleSiPxtSuZKCV1QwN-VWYTZE852vjbDU6xRWkLY6QtA_i5jeNaQ29IE15bSSAhTnWHLSm9q-lFMWhHfYQO91tfNap7jpXG71Mnap6eNryqZccKwY76nJjjIp5pyc1ya00IbYtAlCrQnW36_Wh1f3gus_gkPMf9DLHbrMbUy_HJXTklPC2Bdh5IlP |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3390_fishes7050220 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738967 crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12625 crossref_primary_10_3390_fishes8090455 crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines9080819 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2024_106405 crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_15482 crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12589 crossref_primary_10_3354_aei00385 crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12620 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2024_741901 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2024_741267 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpara_2019_12_005 crossref_primary_10_3390_genes14101870 crossref_primary_10_3354_aei00348 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmars_2021_701793 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2020_735623 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738817 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cbd_2025_101433 crossref_primary_10_1111_cobi_14065 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2021_737066 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2021_105459 crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_15352 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prevetmed_2025_106512 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2023_739557 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolecon_2024_108359 crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12470 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_93874_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_fishes9090336 crossref_primary_10_3389_fvets_2021_768558 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_epidem_2021_100508 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738544 crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12528 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2023_739240 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12639_024_01775_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2023_739884 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2022_110149 crossref_primary_10_1111_jwas_13089 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2023_740274 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2021_105275 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2021_737202 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4100988 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2022_738556 crossref_primary_10_1111_jfb_14761 crossref_primary_10_1111_jiec_13118 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2020_736212 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_17149 crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12456 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_7618 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpara_2020_05_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpara_2024_04_003 crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12498 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aquaculture_2020_735160 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aqrep_2023_101661 crossref_primary_10_1111_are_14805 crossref_primary_10_3354_aei00439 crossref_primary_10_1093_conphys_coae068 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygeno_2023_110721 crossref_primary_10_3390_fishes8020083 crossref_primary_10_3354_aei00436 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/jwas.12099 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.03.032 10.1098/rspb.2012.2359 10.1098/rsos.171752 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00004.x 10.1080/17451000.2016.1262042 10.1111/raq.12299 10.1111/raq.12194 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.02.014 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1983.tb02921.x 10.1016/0044-8486(94)00331-H 10.1016/j.seares.2013.02.009 10.3989/scimar.2011.75n4759 10.3354/dao060123 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.11.020 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01083.x 10.1242/bio.036079 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734224 10.7717/peerj.4837 10.1371/journal.pone.0073539 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.10.048 10.1242/bio.036301 10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001 10.1016/0044-8486(95)01245-1 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.05.024 10.1016/0044-8486(94)90337-9 10.1017/CBO9780511806384 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2000.00225.x 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0169 10.1111/jfd.12937 10.1139/z83-105 10.1080/17451000.2013.810760 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.069 10.1016/j.pt.2014.12.006 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.08.015 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.002 10.1002/ps.3692 10.1016/j.pt.2006.08.006 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2008.01011.x 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.06.003 10.1007/s10164-014-0397-1 10.1371/journal.pone.0119645 10.1093/icesjms/fsx090 10.1002/ps.4560 10.1007/s12562-017-1110-4 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.01.026 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.02.045 10.1111/jfd.12017 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.05.007 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.06.008 10.1111/faf.12198 10.1136/vr.104966 10.1242/jeb.151183 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.02.037 10.1002/ps.509 10.1371/journal.pone.0163052 10.1111/1749-4877.12186 10.1111/jfd.12731 10.1242/jeb.154021 10.1111/jfd.12061 10.2307/2389612 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.02.001 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The authors 2020 Copyright Ecology Institute 2020 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The authors 2020 – notice: Copyright Ecology Institute 2020 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7QG 7SN 7SS 7ST 7TN C1K F1W H9R SOI DOA |
DOI | 10.3354/aei00345 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Animal Behavior Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Environment Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Illustrata: Natural Sciences Environment Abstracts DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Entomology Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Animal Behavior Abstracts ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts ProQuest Illustrata: Natural Sciences Ecology Abstracts Environment Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitleList | Entomology Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture Economics |
EISSN | 1869-7534 |
EndPage | 44 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_242b65a84406413cbdbdb8e8da5fe0ca 10_3354_aei00345 26974213 |
GroupedDBID | 5VS AAEFR AAFWJ ABBHK ABXSQ ACPRK ADBBV ADULT AEKFB AENEX AEUPB AFPKN AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BCNDV EBS EJD GROUPED_DOAJ IZHOT JENOY JPL JST KQ8 OK1 PX8 RIR SA0 SWMRO TR2 AAYXX CITATION 7QG 7SN 7SS 7ST 7TN C1K F1W H9R SOI |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-18fc68f4d521e6d62ff6bdda6f42fc563ad8c3cb645e6dc1be72af8253e94d803 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1869-215X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:50 EDT 2025 Fri Aug 29 17:08:59 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:23 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:40:58 EDT 2025 Thu May 29 13:18:41 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c377t-18fc68f4d521e6d62ff6bdda6f42fc563ad8c3cb645e6dc1be72af8253e94d803 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/242b65a84406413cbdbdb8e8da5fe0ca |
PQID | 2394540834 |
PQPubID | 2048275 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_242b65a84406413cbdbdb8e8da5fe0ca proquest_journals_2394540834 crossref_citationtrail_10_3354_aei00345 crossref_primary_10_3354_aei00345 jstor_primary_26974213 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2020 text: 2020-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Oldendorf |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oldendorf |
PublicationTitle | Aquaculture Environment Interactions |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | Inter-Research Science Center Inter-Research |
Publisher_xml | – name: Inter-Research Science Center – name: Inter-Research |
References | Ref9 Ref43 Ref44 Ref7 Ref41 Ref8 Ref42 Ref5 Ref47 Ref6 Ref48 Ref3 Ref45 Ref4 Ref46 Ref49 Ref40 Ref32 Ref33 Ref30 Ref74 Ref31 Ref36 Ref37 Ref34 Ref35 Ref38 Ref39 Ref1 Ref2 Ref72 Ref73 Ref70 Ref71 Ref21 Ref65 Ref22 Ref66 Ref63 Ref20 Ref64 Ref25 Ref69 Ref26 Ref23 Ref67 Ref24 Ref68 Ref29 Ref27 Ref28 Ref61 Ref62 Ref60 Ref10 Ref54 Ref11 Ref55 Ref52 Ref53 Ref14 Ref58 Ref15 Ref59 Ref12 Ref56 Ref13 Ref57 Ref18 Ref19 Ref16 Ref17 Ref50 Ref51 |
References_xml | – ident: Ref67 doi: 10.1111/jwas.12099 – ident: Ref39 – ident: Ref54 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.03.032 – ident: Ref16 – ident: Ref35 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2359 – ident: Ref41 – ident: Ref2 – ident: Ref14 doi: 10.1098/rsos.171752 – ident: Ref53 doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb00004.x – ident: Ref22 doi: 10.1080/17451000.2016.1262042 – ident: Ref48 doi: 10.1111/raq.12299 – ident: Ref50 doi: 10.1111/raq.12194 – ident: Ref60 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.02.014 – ident: Ref3 doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1983.tb02921.x – ident: Ref12 doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(94)00331-H – ident: Ref70 doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2013.02.009 – ident: Ref49 doi: 10.3989/scimar.2011.75n4759 – ident: Ref19 doi: 10.3354/dao060123 – ident: Ref45 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.11.020 – ident: Ref59 doi: 10.1111/j.1753-5131.2012.01083.x – ident: Ref25 doi: 10.1242/bio.036079 – ident: Ref32 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734224 – ident: Ref34 doi: 10.7717/peerj.4837 – ident: Ref23 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073539 – ident: Ref29 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.10.048 – ident: Ref31 doi: 10.1242/bio.036301 – ident: Ref40 – ident: Ref8 doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.03.001 – ident: Ref44 – ident: Ref68 doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(95)01245-1 – ident: Ref37 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.05.024 – ident: Ref64 doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(94)90337-9 – ident: Ref51 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511806384 – ident: Ref5 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2761.2000.00225.x – ident: Ref26 – ident: Ref33 doi: 10.1139/cjfas-2014-0169 – ident: Ref58 doi: 10.1111/jfd.12937 – ident: Ref66 – ident: Ref11 doi: 10.1139/z83-105 – ident: Ref55 doi: 10.1080/17451000.2013.810760 – ident: Ref43 – ident: Ref21 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.06.069 – ident: Ref1 doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2014.12.006 – ident: Ref30 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.08.015 – ident: Ref73 doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.03.002 – ident: Ref36 doi: 10.1002/ps.3692 – ident: Ref9 doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2006.08.006 – ident: Ref57 – ident: Ref10 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2008.01011.x – ident: Ref15 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.06.003 – ident: Ref27 doi: 10.1007/s10164-014-0397-1 – ident: Ref62 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119645 – ident: Ref71 doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsx090 – ident: Ref47 doi: 10.1002/ps.4560 – ident: Ref17 doi: 10.1007/s12562-017-1110-4 – ident: Ref13 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.01.026 – ident: Ref61 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.02.045 – ident: Ref20 doi: 10.1111/jfd.12017 – ident: Ref38 – ident: Ref74 doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.05.007 – ident: Ref28 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.06.008 – ident: Ref69 doi: 10.1111/faf.12198 – ident: Ref6 doi: 10.1136/vr.104966 – ident: Ref7 doi: 10.1242/jeb.151183 – ident: Ref46 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.02.037 – ident: Ref65 doi: 10.1002/ps.509 – ident: Ref18 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163052 – ident: Ref52 doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12186 – ident: Ref4 doi: 10.1111/jfd.12731 – ident: Ref24 doi: 10.1242/jeb.154021 – ident: Ref63 doi: 10.1111/jfd.12061 – ident: Ref56 – ident: Ref72 doi: 10.2307/2389612 – ident: Ref42 doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2013.02.001 |
SSID | ssj0001255778 |
Score | 2.407745 |
Snippet | Stocking cleaner fish to control sea lice infestations in Atlantic salmon farms is widespread and is viewed as a salmon welfare-friendly alternative to current... |
SourceID | doaj proquest crossref jstor |
SourceType | Open Website Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 31 |
SubjectTerms | Aquaculture Cages Crustaceans Design of experiments Economics Experimental design Farms Fish Fish culture Fish stocking Freshwater fishes Lice Marine fishes Removal Restocking Salmo salar Salmon Species Tanks |
Subtitle | a review of the evidence base |
Title | Sea lice removal by cleaner fish in salmon aquaculture |
URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26974213 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2394540834 https://doaj.org/article/242b65a84406413cbdbdb8e8da5fe0ca |
Volume | 12 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA7Skx7EV7G-iCB4WtzmtVlvKpYi6EULvS2TlxbqVvs4-O-d7G6LouBF9raZfTCT5JsJyfcRcpZFOVtr84QFJhMRMpMYrMAS7hSk0BVOp_Gg8P2D6g_E3VAOv0h9xT1hNT1w7bgLhBCjJGiByIMTrjUOL-21Axl8aqvUCDHvSzFVr65ImVXTcJRcShDXhjXzLOdSXIAfRV4W-Q2LKsr-5a7EHzNzBTe9LbLZ5In0qv6_bbLmyx2ycfU8bbgy_C4ZPHqgYxzodOpfJ9hjqPmgaAyln9Iwmr3QUUlnMMaORuF9Ac2DlxRofWCFTgLF_I_6RlmURkjbI4Pe7dNNP2lUEhLLs2yedHWwSgfhEIi9coqFoIxzoIJgwUrFwWmLflNCYrPtGp8xCFgYcp_HUPA2aZWT0u8TKnKeq-BACIdj2VswLs0hZU5lNtNgOuR86a_CNhTiUcliXGApET1bLD3bIacry7eaNuMXm-vo8lV7JLqubmD4iyb8xV_h75B2FbDVW5jCCol1eYccLSNYNMNyVkQdeExRNRcH__HxQ7LOYvldrcgckdZ8uvDHmKPMzUnVHT8B-GjkcQ |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sea+lice+removal+by+cleaner+fish+in+salmon+aquaculture%3A+a+review+of+the+evidence+base&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture+Environment+Interactions&rft.au=Overton%2C+K&rft.au=Barrett%2C+LT&rft.au=Oppedal%2C+F&rft.au=Kristiansen%2C+TS&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.issn=1869-215X&rft.eissn=1869-7534&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=44&rft_id=info:doi/10.3354%2Faei00345&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_3354_aei00345 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1869-215X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1869-215X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1869-215X&client=summon |