Comparison of perioperative outcomes among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy

Objectives It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among pati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of urology Vol. 29; no. 9; pp. 1026 - 1030
Main Authors Motoyama, Daisuke, Ito, Toshiki, Sugiyama, Takayuki, Otsuka, Atsushi, Miyake, Hideaki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Australia Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.09.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objectives It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy. Methods This study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the ‘E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared. Results Of 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups. Conclusions This study suggests that robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long‐term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required.
AbstractList It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.OBJECTIVESIt has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.This study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the 'E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared.METHODSThis study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the 'E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared.Of 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups.RESULTSOf 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups.This study suggests that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long-term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required.CONCLUSIONSThis study suggests that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long-term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required.
It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. This study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the 'E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared. Of 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups. This study suggests that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long-term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required.
ObjectivesIt has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy.MethodsThis study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the ‘E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared.ResultsOf 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups.ConclusionsThis study suggests that robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long‐term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required.
Objectives It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy. Methods This study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the ‘E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared. Results Of 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups. Conclusions This study suggests that robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long‐term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required.
Author Miyake, Hideaki
Motoyama, Daisuke
Otsuka, Atsushi
Ito, Toshiki
Sugiyama, Takayuki
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Daisuke
  orcidid: 0000-0002-5315-3874
  surname: Motoyama
  fullname: Motoyama, Daisuke
  email: urom1124@yahoo.co.jp
  organization: Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Toshiki
  surname: Ito
  fullname: Ito, Toshiki
  organization: Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Takayuki
  surname: Sugiyama
  fullname: Sugiyama, Takayuki
  organization: Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Atsushi
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6472-0988
  surname: Otsuka
  fullname: Otsuka, Atsushi
  organization: Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Hideaki
  surname: Miyake
  fullname: Miyake, Hideaki
  organization: Hamamatsu University School of Medicine
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35669994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kc1u1DAUhS3Uik4LC14AWWJTJNL6L068RCN-iiqxoWvLE990PErsYDsts-sjsOfteBJMZ9pFBV5c21ffOdK95xgd-OABoVeUnNFyzt1mPqNCCfkMLagQrGJEsAO0IIqqqqUNO0LHKW0IoZzR9jk64rWUSimxQL-WYZxMdCl4HHo8QXShFJPdDeAw5y6MkLAZg7_GU-mCzwnfurzG8CNM62123TtckMe38RaDt_s_juDNgPM8hpjw7C3E6-CKVwyrkH_f_TQpuZTBFvOYXUE9TOsIXQ7j9gU67M2Q4OX-PkFXHz98W36uLr9-uli-v6w63jSykpyplQQJ0Jsyd1eDabllsq97ZogifdtYZVrRSzCqNrZulOgtEEssSMM5P0GnO98phu8zpKxHlzoYBuMhzEkz2QhCGn6PvnmCbsIcy4iFaqhgXDAiC_V6T82rEayeohtN3OqHtRfgfAd0MaQUodedy2W7wedo3KAp0X-D1SVYfR9sUbx9ongw_Re7d791A2z_D-qLL1c7xR9bnbfe
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2022_0775
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_025_04431_3
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1105877
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1178592
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2023_1118971
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajur_2023_06_001
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1444477
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2024_10_032
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2023_0608
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_023_01614_x
Cites_doi 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
10.1056/NEJMcp0910041
10.1111/bju.14250
10.1111/iju.14763
10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.012
10.1111/iju.12902
10.1111/iju.13901
10.1111/iju.13580
10.1089/end.2016.0351
10.1111/iju.14079
10.1089/end.2008.0601
10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.012
10.1111/ases.12683
10.1007/s11934-019-0864-x
10.1111/iju.12462
10.1007/s11701-019-00924-3
10.1159/000499300
10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035
10.1111/bju.12455
10.1002/rcs.1574
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 The Japanese Urological Association.
2022 The Japanese Urological Association
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 The Japanese Urological Association.
– notice: 2022 The Japanese Urological Association
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7QP
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1111/iju.14946
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1442-2042
EndPage 1030
ExternalDocumentID 35669994
10_1111_iju_14946
IJU14946
Genre article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.55
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29J
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIACR
AIAGR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBC
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPT
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
Q~Q
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
V8K
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WRC
WUP
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
X7M
XG1
YFH
YUY
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAYXX
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
CITATION
NPM
7QP
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3776-6329b6e6eefa042c5ea83d26f5f2a090f87d9a84f6ea95ad5794fde0d0de6a333
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0919-8172
1442-2042
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 22:23:52 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:08:08 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:08:27 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:09 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:50:14 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:24:18 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Keywords mesophytic tumor
exophytic tumor
endophytic tumor
robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
Language English
License 2022 The Japanese Urological Association.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3776-6329b6e6eefa042c5ea83d26f5f2a090f87d9a84f6ea95ad5794fde0d0de6a333
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-6472-0988
0000-0002-5315-3874
PMID 35669994
PQID 2714234206
PQPubID 2045142
PageCount 1030
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2674007333
proquest_journals_2714234206
pubmed_primary_35669994
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_iju_14946
crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_14946
wiley_primary_10_1111_iju_14946_IJU14946
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate September 2022
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2022
  text: September 2022
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Australia
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Australia
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle International journal of urology
PublicationTitleAlternate Int J Urol
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 2021; 47
2017; 31
2018; 122
2010; 24
2019; 20
2009; 182
2019; 13
2004; 240
2015; 22
2019; 26
2010; 362
2020; 14
2020; 13
2014; 84
2014; 21
2014; 10
2018; 25
2022; 29
2014; 113
e_1_2_12_4_1
e_1_2_12_3_1
e_1_2_12_6_1
e_1_2_12_5_1
e_1_2_12_19_1
e_1_2_12_18_1
e_1_2_12_2_1
e_1_2_12_17_1
e_1_2_12_16_1
e_1_2_12_20_1
e_1_2_12_21_1
e_1_2_12_15_1
e_1_2_12_14_1
e_1_2_12_13_1
e_1_2_12_12_1
e_1_2_12_8_1
e_1_2_12_11_1
e_1_2_12_7_1
e_1_2_12_10_1
e_1_2_12_9_1
References_xml – volume: 122
  start-page: 618
  year: 2018
  end-page: 26
  article-title: Functional and oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre comparative matched‐pair analyses with a median of 5 years' follow‐up
  publication-title: BJU Int
– volume: 14
  start-page: 47
  year: 2020
  end-page: 53
  article-title: Improved perioperative outcomes by early unclamping prior to renorrhaphy compared with conventional clamping during robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis
  publication-title: J. Robot. Surg
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1179
  year: 2021
  end-page: 86
  article-title: Outcomes of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: a multicenter analysis
  publication-title: Eur. J. Surg. Oncol
– volume: 25
  start-page: 606
  year: 2018
  end-page: 14
  article-title: Purely off‐clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: preliminary 3‐year oncological and functional outcomes
  publication-title: Int. J. Urol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 985
  year: 2019
  end-page: 91
  article-title: On‐clamp versus off‐clamp partial nephrectomy: propensity score‐matched comparison of long‐term functional outcomes
  publication-title: Int. J. Urol
– volume: 13
  start-page: 59
  year: 2020
  end-page: 64
  article-title: Initial learning curve for robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy performed by a single experienced robotics surgeon
  publication-title: Asian J. Endosc. Surg
– volume: 10
  start-page: 385
  year: 2014
  end-page: 90
  article-title: Console‐integrated real‐time three‐dimensional image overlay navigation for robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy with selective arterial clamping: early single‐centre experience with 17 cases
  publication-title: Int. J. Med. Robot
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1096
  year: 2015
  end-page: 102
  article-title: Early unclamping might reduce the risk of renal artery pseudoaneurysm after robot‐assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
  publication-title: Int. J. Urol
– volume: 24
  start-page: 57
  year: 2010
  end-page: 61
  article-title: Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy: evaluation of learning curve for an experienced renal surgeon
  publication-title: J. Endourol
– volume: 84
  start-page: 1367
  year: 2014
  end-page: 73
  article-title: Robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: complications and functional and oncologic outcomes during a 4‐year median period of follow‐up
  publication-title: Urology
– volume: 20
  start-page: 3
  year: 2019
  article-title: Surgical treatment of completely endophytic renal tumor: a systematic review
  publication-title: Curr. Urol. Rep
– volume: 26
  start-page: 446
  year: 2019
  end-page: 50
  article-title: Peritumoral pseudocapsule status according to pathological characteristics from robot‐assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma
  publication-title: Int. J. Urol
– volume: 182
  start-page: 844
  year: 2009
  end-page: 53
  article-title: The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth
  publication-title: J. Urol
– volume: 113
  start-page: 762
  year: 2014
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for completely endophytic renal masses: a single institution experience
  publication-title: BJU Int
– volume: 21
  start-page: 880
  year: 2014
  end-page: 5
  article-title: Enhanced computed tomography after partial nephrectomy in early postoperative period to detect asymptomatic renal artery pseudoaneurysm
  publication-title: Int. J. Urol
– volume: 240
  start-page: 205
  year: 2004
  end-page: 13
  article-title: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
  publication-title: Ann. Surg
– volume: 13
  start-page: 13
  year: 2019
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Early single‐center experience with robotic partial nephrectomy using the da Vinci xi: comparative assessment with conventional open partial nephrectomy
  publication-title: Current Urol
– volume: 362
  start-page: 624
  year: 2010
  end-page: 34
  article-title: Clinical practice. Small renal mass
  publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med
– volume: 31
  start-page: 893
  year: 2017
  end-page: 909
  article-title: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative studies reporting perioperative outcomes of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy
  publication-title: J. Endourol
– volume: 29
  start-page: 282
  year: 2022
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Expanding the limits of nephron‐sparing surgery: surgical technique and mid‐term outcomes of purely off‐clamp robotic partial nephrectomy for totally endophytic renal tumors
  publication-title: Int. J. Urol
– ident: e_1_2_12_13_1
  doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
– ident: e_1_2_12_2_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0910041
– ident: e_1_2_12_4_1
  doi: 10.1111/bju.14250
– ident: e_1_2_12_21_1
  doi: 10.1111/iju.14763
– ident: e_1_2_12_12_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.012
– ident: e_1_2_12_16_1
  doi: 10.1111/iju.12902
– ident: e_1_2_12_18_1
  doi: 10.1111/iju.13901
– ident: e_1_2_12_19_1
  doi: 10.1111/iju.13580
– ident: e_1_2_12_3_1
  doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0351
– ident: e_1_2_12_20_1
  doi: 10.1111/iju.14079
– ident: e_1_2_12_6_1
  doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0601
– ident: e_1_2_12_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.012
– ident: e_1_2_12_7_1
  doi: 10.1111/ases.12683
– ident: e_1_2_12_9_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0864-x
– ident: e_1_2_12_14_1
  doi: 10.1111/iju.12462
– ident: e_1_2_12_17_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00924-3
– ident: e_1_2_12_5_1
  doi: 10.1159/000499300
– ident: e_1_2_12_8_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035
– ident: e_1_2_12_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/bju.12455
– ident: e_1_2_12_15_1
  doi: 10.1002/rcs.1574
SSID ssj0013218
Score 2.3842087
Snippet Objectives It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several...
It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical...
ObjectivesIt has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1026
SubjectTerms Computed tomography
Endophytes
endophytic tumor
exophytic tumor
Ischemia
Kidneys
mesophytic tumor
Nephrectomy
Parenchyma
Robotic surgery
Robots
robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy
Tumors
Title Comparison of perioperative outcomes among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fiju.14946
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35669994
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2714234206
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2674007333
Volume 29
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JbtYwELaqHhAX9uWnBRnEgQOpUttxEnFCFVWpVA6IX-oBKbLjMWJpXGWRKCcegTtvx5Mw4yxqWSTEzVEmsWPPeL6M7W8Ye-wNcYhAnaSwKxIlPCTWZiLR6L2U2HVGAcU7jl7pg7U6PM6ON9iz-SzMyA-xBNzIMuJ8TQZubHfOyN9_GNDMS0V027RXiwDRa3FuBSHG9tAdUpgrFxOrEO3iWZ686It-A5gX8Wp0OPtX2du5qeM-k487Q2936i-_sDj-57dcY1cmIMqfj5pznW1Ac4NdOpqW2m-y73tLhkIePCdC5HAKI084D0OPVUDHY64iPpGzdpyiuhw-Bxw7fO1TjiJL2TSOQ-Oma94CVd8PJ6HtOJ1ka98FdKO8DTb0P75-Q1BPGujw5dhEFG2A9K7uw8nZLbbef_Fm7yCZMjkktcxznWgpSqtBA3iDs0SdgSmkE9pnXpi0TH2Ru9IUymswZWZchrOEd5C61IE2UsrbbLMJDdxlXCHCzR1Y4VOjCshR3NLSry4KxKpCrNiTeUyreqI5p2wbn6r5dwc7u4qdvWKPFtHTkdvjT0Lbs2JUk3l3lchRkaUSKd5-uNxGw6TVFtNAGFAG1T2mxJQrdmdUqKUWiSAakbnCxka1-Hv11cvDdSzc-3fRLXZZ0CGNuBNum2327QD3ETr19kG0kZ_ERxno
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtUwEB2VIgEb3o8LBQxiwYJUqe04icQGVVS3pbcL1Ct1gyInHiMejavcRAJWfAJ7_o4vYew81PKQELtEmcSOPeM5HttnAJ5Y7TlEsIpi3OKR5Bajskx4pMh7Sb5ltEQf71gcqPlS7h0lR2vwfDwL0_NDTAE3bxlhvPYG7gPSp6z83fuO7DyX6hyc9xm9w4TqNT-1hhCie-QQfaAr5QOvkN_HM7161hv9BjHPItbgcnauwJuxsv1Okw-bXVtuVl9-4XH837-5CpcHLMpe9MpzDdawvg4XFsNq-w34vj0lKWTOMs-J7E6wpwpnrmupDFyxkK6IDfysK-YDuww_Oeo--uwzRiLTta4Nw9oM96xBX3zbHbtmxfxhtuatI0_KGle69sfXb4TrvRIa-jhVkURr9KpXte74801Y7rw83J5HQzKHqBJpqiIleF4qVIhW00BRJagzYbiyieU6zmObpSbXmbQKdZ5ok9BAYQ3GJjaotBDiFqzXrsY7wCSB3NRgyW2sZYYpiZd-9VdlGcFVzmfwdOzUohqYzn3CjY_FOOOhxi5CY8_g8SR60tN7_EloY9SMYrDwVcFT0mUheUyPH02PyTb9gouu0XUkQxofsmKKGdzuNWoqRRCOJnAuqbJBL_5efLG7twwXd_9d9CFcnB8u9ov93YNX9-AS92c2wsa4DVhvmw7vE5JqywfBYH4COS0eAw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VIlVcWp5laQGDOHAgVeo4TiJOqGXVFlohxEo9IEVOPEZQGq-yidRy4idw59_xSxg7D7U8JMQtUSaxN_nG8-3Y_gbgiVFOQwTLIMRtHghuMCiKmAeSopfg21oJdPmOwyO5NxMHx_HxEjwf9sJ0-hBjws15hh-vnYPPtbng5B8_teTmmZBX4KqQYeogvfuWX5hC8Mk9iocuz5XwXlbILeMZb70cjH5jmJcJq4840zV4P_S1W2hystU2xVb55RcZx__8MddhtWei7EUHnRuwhNVNWDns59pvwfedsUQhs4Y5RWQ7x04onNm2oSZwwXyxItarsy6YS-syPLP08eixzxiZjMeq0gwr3Z-zGl3zTXtq6wVzW9nqD5biKKttYZsfX78Rq3cQ1PRw6iKZVuiAVzb29Pw2zKYv3-3sBX0ph6CMkkQGMuJZIVEiGkXDRBmjSiPNpYkNV2EWmjTRmUqFkaiyWOmYhgmjMdShRqmiKLoDy5Wt8C4wQRQ30VhwEyqRYkLmhZv7lWlKZJXzCTwdvmle9jrnrtzG53z4v0MvO_cvewKPR9N5J-7xJ6PNARh579-LnCeE5EjwkC4_Gi-TZ7rpFlWhbcmG8O5rYkYTWO8ANbYSEYsmai6osx4Wf28-3z-Y-YN7_276EFbe7E7z1_tHrzbgGncbNvyquE1YbuoW7xONaooH3l1-AvcmHLs
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+perioperative+outcomes+among+patients+with+exophytic%2C+mesophytic%2C+and+endophytic+renal+tumors+undergoing+robot-assisted+partial+nephrectomy&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+urology&rft.au=Motoyama%2C+Daisuke&rft.au=Ito%2C+Toshiki&rft.au=Sugiyama%2C+Takayuki&rft.au=Otsuka%2C+Atsushi&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.eissn=1442-2042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fiju.14946&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35669994&rft.externalDocID=35669994
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0919-8172&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0919-8172&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0919-8172&client=summon