Comparison of perioperative outcomes among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy
Objectives It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among pati...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of urology Vol. 29; no. 9; pp. 1026 - 1030 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Australia
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.09.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objectives
It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy.
Methods
This study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the ‘E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared.
Results
Of 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups.
Conclusions
This study suggests that robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long‐term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required. |
---|---|
AbstractList | It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.OBJECTIVESIt has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.This study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the 'E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared.METHODSThis study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the 'E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared.Of 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups.RESULTSOf 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups.This study suggests that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long-term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required.CONCLUSIONSThis study suggests that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long-term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required. It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. This study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the 'E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared. Of 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups. This study suggests that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long-term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required. ObjectivesIt has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy.MethodsThis study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the ‘E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared.ResultsOf 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups.ConclusionsThis study suggests that robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long‐term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required. Objectives It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical difficulties even with the assistance of a robotic surgical system. This study aimed to compare perioperative variables among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy. Methods This study retrospectively included 265 consecutive patients with localized small renal masses undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy at our institution. In this study, completely endophytic tumor was defined as the mass totally covered by renal healthy parenchyma, and according to the points for the ‘E' domain of RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative computed tomography, subjects were classified into three groups as follows: exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, and perioperative outcomes among these groups were compared. Results Of 265 patients, 127, 112, and 26 were classified into the exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic tumor groups, respectively. A significantly smaller tumor diameter was observed in the endophytic group than in the other groups (P < 0.001), whereas the RENAL nephrometry score was significantly higher (P < 0.001). In addition, the warm ischemia time in the endophytic tumor group was significantly longer than that in other groups (P = 0.009); however, no significant difference in the trifecta achievement was noted among the three groups. Conclusions This study suggests that robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy for patients with completely endophytic tumors can be regarded as a feasible approach without marked impairment of perioperative outcomes; however, further investigation of the long‐term functional and oncological outcomes in these patients is required. |
Author | Miyake, Hideaki Motoyama, Daisuke Otsuka, Atsushi Ito, Toshiki Sugiyama, Takayuki |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Daisuke orcidid: 0000-0002-5315-3874 surname: Motoyama fullname: Motoyama, Daisuke email: urom1124@yahoo.co.jp organization: Hamamatsu University School of Medicine – sequence: 2 givenname: Toshiki surname: Ito fullname: Ito, Toshiki organization: Hamamatsu University School of Medicine – sequence: 3 givenname: Takayuki surname: Sugiyama fullname: Sugiyama, Takayuki organization: Hamamatsu University School of Medicine – sequence: 4 givenname: Atsushi orcidid: 0000-0001-6472-0988 surname: Otsuka fullname: Otsuka, Atsushi organization: Hamamatsu University School of Medicine – sequence: 5 givenname: Hideaki surname: Miyake fullname: Miyake, Hideaki organization: Hamamatsu University School of Medicine |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35669994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kc1u1DAUhS3Uik4LC14AWWJTJNL6L068RCN-iiqxoWvLE990PErsYDsts-sjsOfteBJMZ9pFBV5c21ffOdK95xgd-OABoVeUnNFyzt1mPqNCCfkMLagQrGJEsAO0IIqqqqUNO0LHKW0IoZzR9jk64rWUSimxQL-WYZxMdCl4HHo8QXShFJPdDeAw5y6MkLAZg7_GU-mCzwnfurzG8CNM62123TtckMe38RaDt_s_juDNgPM8hpjw7C3E6-CKVwyrkH_f_TQpuZTBFvOYXUE9TOsIXQ7j9gU67M2Q4OX-PkFXHz98W36uLr9-uli-v6w63jSykpyplQQJ0Jsyd1eDabllsq97ZogifdtYZVrRSzCqNrZulOgtEEssSMM5P0GnO98phu8zpKxHlzoYBuMhzEkz2QhCGn6PvnmCbsIcy4iFaqhgXDAiC_V6T82rEayeohtN3OqHtRfgfAd0MaQUodedy2W7wedo3KAp0X-D1SVYfR9sUbx9ongw_Re7d791A2z_D-qLL1c7xR9bnbfe |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2022_0775 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_025_04431_3 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1105877 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1178592 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2023_1118971 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajur_2023_06_001 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1444477 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2024_10_032 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2023_0608 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_023_01614_x |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae 10.1056/NEJMcp0910041 10.1111/bju.14250 10.1111/iju.14763 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.012 10.1111/iju.12902 10.1111/iju.13901 10.1111/iju.13580 10.1089/end.2016.0351 10.1111/iju.14079 10.1089/end.2008.0601 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.012 10.1111/ases.12683 10.1007/s11934-019-0864-x 10.1111/iju.12462 10.1007/s11701-019-00924-3 10.1159/000499300 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035 10.1111/bju.12455 10.1002/rcs.1574 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022 The Japanese Urological Association. 2022 The Japanese Urological Association |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 The Japanese Urological Association. – notice: 2022 The Japanese Urological Association |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7QP K9. 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/iju.14946 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1442-2042 |
EndPage | 1030 |
ExternalDocumentID | 35669994 10_1111_iju_14946 IJU14946 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .55 .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29J 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN ADZOD AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFWVQ AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AIACR AIAGR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EAD EAP EAS EBC EBD EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN EPT ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 Q~Q R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 V8K W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQJ WRC WUP WVDHM WXI WXSBR X7M XG1 YFH YUY ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAYXX AGHNM AGQPQ AGYGG CITATION NPM 7QP AAMMB AEFGJ AGXDD AIDQK AIDYY K9. 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3776-6329b6e6eefa042c5ea83d26f5f2a090f87d9a84f6ea95ad5794fde0d0de6a333 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0919-8172 1442-2042 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 22:23:52 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:08:08 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:08:27 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:02:09 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:50:14 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:24:18 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Keywords | mesophytic tumor exophytic tumor endophytic tumor robot-assisted partial nephrectomy |
Language | English |
License | 2022 The Japanese Urological Association. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3776-6329b6e6eefa042c5ea83d26f5f2a090f87d9a84f6ea95ad5794fde0d0de6a333 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-6472-0988 0000-0002-5315-3874 |
PMID | 35669994 |
PQID | 2714234206 |
PQPubID | 2045142 |
PageCount | 1030 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2674007333 proquest_journals_2714234206 pubmed_primary_35669994 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_iju_14946 crossref_primary_10_1111_iju_14946 wiley_primary_10_1111_iju_14946_IJU14946 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | September 2022 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2022 text: September 2022 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Australia |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Australia – name: Hoboken |
PublicationTitle | International journal of urology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Int J Urol |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 2021; 47 2017; 31 2018; 122 2010; 24 2019; 20 2009; 182 2019; 13 2004; 240 2015; 22 2019; 26 2010; 362 2020; 14 2020; 13 2014; 84 2014; 21 2014; 10 2018; 25 2022; 29 2014; 113 e_1_2_12_4_1 e_1_2_12_3_1 e_1_2_12_6_1 e_1_2_12_5_1 e_1_2_12_19_1 e_1_2_12_18_1 e_1_2_12_2_1 e_1_2_12_17_1 e_1_2_12_16_1 e_1_2_12_20_1 e_1_2_12_21_1 e_1_2_12_15_1 e_1_2_12_14_1 e_1_2_12_13_1 e_1_2_12_12_1 e_1_2_12_8_1 e_1_2_12_11_1 e_1_2_12_7_1 e_1_2_12_10_1 e_1_2_12_9_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 122 start-page: 618 year: 2018 end-page: 26 article-title: Functional and oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicentre comparative matched‐pair analyses with a median of 5 years' follow‐up publication-title: BJU Int – volume: 14 start-page: 47 year: 2020 end-page: 53 article-title: Improved perioperative outcomes by early unclamping prior to renorrhaphy compared with conventional clamping during robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis publication-title: J. Robot. Surg – volume: 47 start-page: 1179 year: 2021 end-page: 86 article-title: Outcomes of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: a multicenter analysis publication-title: Eur. J. Surg. Oncol – volume: 25 start-page: 606 year: 2018 end-page: 14 article-title: Purely off‐clamp robotic partial nephrectomy: preliminary 3‐year oncological and functional outcomes publication-title: Int. J. Urol – volume: 26 start-page: 985 year: 2019 end-page: 91 article-title: On‐clamp versus off‐clamp partial nephrectomy: propensity score‐matched comparison of long‐term functional outcomes publication-title: Int. J. Urol – volume: 13 start-page: 59 year: 2020 end-page: 64 article-title: Initial learning curve for robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy performed by a single experienced robotics surgeon publication-title: Asian J. Endosc. Surg – volume: 10 start-page: 385 year: 2014 end-page: 90 article-title: Console‐integrated real‐time three‐dimensional image overlay navigation for robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy with selective arterial clamping: early single‐centre experience with 17 cases publication-title: Int. J. Med. Robot – volume: 22 start-page: 1096 year: 2015 end-page: 102 article-title: Early unclamping might reduce the risk of renal artery pseudoaneurysm after robot‐assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy publication-title: Int. J. Urol – volume: 24 start-page: 57 year: 2010 end-page: 61 article-title: Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy: evaluation of learning curve for an experienced renal surgeon publication-title: J. Endourol – volume: 84 start-page: 1367 year: 2014 end-page: 73 article-title: Robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: complications and functional and oncologic outcomes during a 4‐year median period of follow‐up publication-title: Urology – volume: 20 start-page: 3 year: 2019 article-title: Surgical treatment of completely endophytic renal tumor: a systematic review publication-title: Curr. Urol. Rep – volume: 26 start-page: 446 year: 2019 end-page: 50 article-title: Peritumoral pseudocapsule status according to pathological characteristics from robot‐assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma publication-title: Int. J. Urol – volume: 182 start-page: 844 year: 2009 end-page: 53 article-title: The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth publication-title: J. Urol – volume: 113 start-page: 762 year: 2014 end-page: 8 article-title: Robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for completely endophytic renal masses: a single institution experience publication-title: BJU Int – volume: 21 start-page: 880 year: 2014 end-page: 5 article-title: Enhanced computed tomography after partial nephrectomy in early postoperative period to detect asymptomatic renal artery pseudoaneurysm publication-title: Int. J. Urol – volume: 240 start-page: 205 year: 2004 end-page: 13 article-title: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey publication-title: Ann. Surg – volume: 13 start-page: 13 year: 2019 end-page: 8 article-title: Early single‐center experience with robotic partial nephrectomy using the da Vinci xi: comparative assessment with conventional open partial nephrectomy publication-title: Current Urol – volume: 362 start-page: 624 year: 2010 end-page: 34 article-title: Clinical practice. Small renal mass publication-title: N. Engl. J. Med – volume: 31 start-page: 893 year: 2017 end-page: 909 article-title: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of comparative studies reporting perioperative outcomes of robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy publication-title: J. Endourol – volume: 29 start-page: 282 year: 2022 end-page: 8 article-title: Expanding the limits of nephron‐sparing surgery: surgical technique and mid‐term outcomes of purely off‐clamp robotic partial nephrectomy for totally endophytic renal tumors publication-title: Int. J. Urol – ident: e_1_2_12_13_1 doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae – ident: e_1_2_12_2_1 doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp0910041 – ident: e_1_2_12_4_1 doi: 10.1111/bju.14250 – ident: e_1_2_12_21_1 doi: 10.1111/iju.14763 – ident: e_1_2_12_12_1 doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.012 – ident: e_1_2_12_16_1 doi: 10.1111/iju.12902 – ident: e_1_2_12_18_1 doi: 10.1111/iju.13901 – ident: e_1_2_12_19_1 doi: 10.1111/iju.13580 – ident: e_1_2_12_3_1 doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0351 – ident: e_1_2_12_20_1 doi: 10.1111/iju.14079 – ident: e_1_2_12_6_1 doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0601 – ident: e_1_2_12_10_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.012 – ident: e_1_2_12_7_1 doi: 10.1111/ases.12683 – ident: e_1_2_12_9_1 doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0864-x – ident: e_1_2_12_14_1 doi: 10.1111/iju.12462 – ident: e_1_2_12_17_1 doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00924-3 – ident: e_1_2_12_5_1 doi: 10.1159/000499300 – ident: e_1_2_12_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035 – ident: e_1_2_12_11_1 doi: 10.1111/bju.12455 – ident: e_1_2_12_15_1 doi: 10.1002/rcs.1574 |
SSID | ssj0013218 |
Score | 2.3842087 |
Snippet | Objectives
It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several... It has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several technical... ObjectivesIt has been well documented that partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors is a highly challenging procedure accompanied by several... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1026 |
SubjectTerms | Computed tomography Endophytes endophytic tumor exophytic tumor Ischemia Kidneys mesophytic tumor Nephrectomy Parenchyma Robotic surgery Robots robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy Tumors |
Title | Comparison of perioperative outcomes among patients with exophytic, mesophytic, and endophytic renal tumors undergoing robot‐assisted partial nephrectomy |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fiju.14946 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35669994 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2714234206 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2674007333 |
Volume | 29 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JbtYwELaqHhAX9uWnBRnEgQOpUttxEnFCFVWpVA6IX-oBKbLjMWJpXGWRKCcegTtvx5Mw4yxqWSTEzVEmsWPPeL6M7W8Ye-wNcYhAnaSwKxIlPCTWZiLR6L2U2HVGAcU7jl7pg7U6PM6ON9iz-SzMyA-xBNzIMuJ8TQZubHfOyN9_GNDMS0V027RXiwDRa3FuBSHG9tAdUpgrFxOrEO3iWZ686It-A5gX8Wp0OPtX2du5qeM-k487Q2936i-_sDj-57dcY1cmIMqfj5pznW1Ac4NdOpqW2m-y73tLhkIePCdC5HAKI084D0OPVUDHY64iPpGzdpyiuhw-Bxw7fO1TjiJL2TSOQ-Oma94CVd8PJ6HtOJ1ka98FdKO8DTb0P75-Q1BPGujw5dhEFG2A9K7uw8nZLbbef_Fm7yCZMjkktcxznWgpSqtBA3iDs0SdgSmkE9pnXpi0TH2Ru9IUymswZWZchrOEd5C61IE2UsrbbLMJDdxlXCHCzR1Y4VOjCshR3NLSry4KxKpCrNiTeUyreqI5p2wbn6r5dwc7u4qdvWKPFtHTkdvjT0Lbs2JUk3l3lchRkaUSKd5-uNxGw6TVFtNAGFAG1T2mxJQrdmdUqKUWiSAakbnCxka1-Hv11cvDdSzc-3fRLXZZ0CGNuBNum2327QD3ETr19kG0kZ_ERxno |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3LbtUwEB2VIgEb3o8LBQxiwYJUqe04icQGVVS3pbcL1Ct1gyInHiMejavcRAJWfAJ7_o4vYew81PKQELtEmcSOPeM5HttnAJ5Y7TlEsIpi3OKR5Bajskx4pMh7Sb5ltEQf71gcqPlS7h0lR2vwfDwL0_NDTAE3bxlhvPYG7gPSp6z83fuO7DyX6hyc9xm9w4TqNT-1hhCie-QQfaAr5QOvkN_HM7161hv9BjHPItbgcnauwJuxsv1Okw-bXVtuVl9-4XH837-5CpcHLMpe9MpzDdawvg4XFsNq-w34vj0lKWTOMs-J7E6wpwpnrmupDFyxkK6IDfysK-YDuww_Oeo--uwzRiLTta4Nw9oM96xBX3zbHbtmxfxhtuatI0_KGle69sfXb4TrvRIa-jhVkURr9KpXte74801Y7rw83J5HQzKHqBJpqiIleF4qVIhW00BRJagzYbiyieU6zmObpSbXmbQKdZ5ok9BAYQ3GJjaotBDiFqzXrsY7wCSB3NRgyW2sZYYpiZd-9VdlGcFVzmfwdOzUohqYzn3CjY_FOOOhxi5CY8_g8SR60tN7_EloY9SMYrDwVcFT0mUheUyPH02PyTb9gouu0XUkQxofsmKKGdzuNWoqRRCOJnAuqbJBL_5efLG7twwXd_9d9CFcnB8u9ov93YNX9-AS92c2wsa4DVhvmw7vE5JqywfBYH4COS0eAw |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwEB6VIlVcWp5laQGDOHAgVeo4TiJOqGXVFlohxEo9IEVOPEZQGq-yidRy4idw59_xSxg7D7U8JMQtUSaxN_nG8-3Y_gbgiVFOQwTLIMRtHghuMCiKmAeSopfg21oJdPmOwyO5NxMHx_HxEjwf9sJ0-hBjws15hh-vnYPPtbng5B8_teTmmZBX4KqQYeogvfuWX5hC8Mk9iocuz5XwXlbILeMZb70cjH5jmJcJq4840zV4P_S1W2hystU2xVb55RcZx__8MddhtWei7EUHnRuwhNVNWDns59pvwfedsUQhs4Y5RWQ7x04onNm2oSZwwXyxItarsy6YS-syPLP08eixzxiZjMeq0gwr3Z-zGl3zTXtq6wVzW9nqD5biKKttYZsfX78Rq3cQ1PRw6iKZVuiAVzb29Pw2zKYv3-3sBX0ph6CMkkQGMuJZIVEiGkXDRBmjSiPNpYkNV2EWmjTRmUqFkaiyWOmYhgmjMdShRqmiKLoDy5Wt8C4wQRQ30VhwEyqRYkLmhZv7lWlKZJXzCTwdvmle9jrnrtzG53z4v0MvO_cvewKPR9N5J-7xJ6PNARh579-LnCeE5EjwkC4_Gi-TZ7rpFlWhbcmG8O5rYkYTWO8ANbYSEYsmai6osx4Wf28-3z-Y-YN7_276EFbe7E7z1_tHrzbgGncbNvyquE1YbuoW7xONaooH3l1-AvcmHLs |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+perioperative+outcomes+among+patients+with+exophytic%2C+mesophytic%2C+and+endophytic+renal+tumors+undergoing+robot-assisted+partial+nephrectomy&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+urology&rft.au=Motoyama%2C+Daisuke&rft.au=Ito%2C+Toshiki&rft.au=Sugiyama%2C+Takayuki&rft.au=Otsuka%2C+Atsushi&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.eissn=1442-2042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fiju.14946&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35669994&rft.externalDocID=35669994 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0919-8172&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0919-8172&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0919-8172&client=summon |