The self-thinning exponent in overcrowded stands of the mangrove, Kandelia obovata, on Okinawa Island, Japan

Weller’s allometric model assumes that the allometric relationships of mean area occupied by a tree , i.e., the reciprocal of population density , , mean tree height , and mean aboveground mass density to mean aboveground mass hold. Using the model, the self-thinning line of overcrowded Kandelia obo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of oceanography Vol. 68; no. 6; pp. 851 - 856
Main Authors Kamara, Mouctar, Deshar, Rashila, Sharma, Sahadev, Kamruzzaman, Md, Hagihara, Akio
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan Springer Japan 01.12.2012
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Weller’s allometric model assumes that the allometric relationships of mean area occupied by a tree , i.e., the reciprocal of population density , , mean tree height , and mean aboveground mass density to mean aboveground mass hold. Using the model, the self-thinning line of overcrowded Kandelia obovata stands in Okinawa, Japan, was studied over 8 years. Mean tree height increased with increasing . The values of the allometric constant and the multiplying factor are 0.3857 and 2.157 m kg −θ , respectively. The allometric constant and the multiplying factor are −0.01673 and 2.685 m −3  kg 1−δ , respectively. The value was not significantly different from zero, showing that remains constant regardless of any increase in . The average of , i.e., biomass density , was 2.641 ± 0.022 kg m −3 , which was considerably higher than 1.3–1.5 kg m −3 of most terrestrial forests. The self-thinning exponent and the multiplying factor were estimated to be 1.585 and 16.18 kg m −2α , respectively. The estimators and are dependent on each other. Therefore, the observed value of cannot be used for the test of the hypothesis that the expectation of the estimator equals 1/3, i.e., , or 1/4, i.e., . The value was 0.6310, which is the same as the reciprocal of the self-thinning exponent of 1.585, and was not significantly different from 2/3 ( t  = 1.860, df  = 191, p  = 0.06429), i.e., . Thus the self-thinning exponent is not significantly different from 3/2 based on the simple geometric model. On the other hand, the self-thinning exponent was significantly different from 3/4 ( t  = 6.213, df  = 191, p  = 3.182 × 10 −9 ), i.e., . Therefore, the self-thinning exponent is significantly different from 4/3 based on the metabolic model.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0916-8370
1573-868X
DOI:10.1007/s10872-012-0135-7