Reducing veal calves' reactivity to people by providing additional human contact

• Published in: Journal of animal science Vol. 78; no. 5; pp. 1213 - 1218
• Main Authors: Lensink, B. J, Boivin, X, Pradel, P, Le Neindre, P, Veissier, I
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Savoy, IL Am Soc Animal Sci 01.05.2000; American Society of Animal Science; Oxford University Press
• Subjects: Animal behavior; Animal Husbandry - methods; Animal productions; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Cattle; Cattle - psychology; Cattle industry; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Handling (Psychology); Humans; Social Behavior; Terrestrial animal productions; Vertebrates; Ethology; Farming animal; Ruminant animal; Experimental study; Young animal; Contact; Man animal relation; Fear; Vertebrata; Mammalia; Beef cattle; Artiodactyla; Farmer; Animal handling; Ungulata
• DOI: 10.2527/2000.7851213x
• ISSN: 0021-8812

We studied the importance of the stockperson's behavior on veal calf behavior using 22 veal calves housed in individual crates. Eleven calves received minimal contact from the stockperson, and the other 11 calves were stroked and allowed to suck the stockperson's fingers after each meal during the entire fattening period (21 wk). The effects of this additional contact with the stockperson on the calves' responses to people was studied, when in their home environment (crate) or outside their home environment (singly in a novel arena). When tested in their home environment, the calves receiving additional contact withdrew less from the approach of humans (familiar or unfamiliar) (P < .05) compared with control calves. When tested outside the home environment with a human (familiar or unfamiliar) standing motionless, calves that had received additional contact interacted more frequently and for a longer time with the humans and defecated less often compared with control calves (P < .05). In conclusion, being stroked and sucking the stockperson's fingers seemed to be experienced as positive by the calf, because they reduced withdrawal from and increased approaches to familiar and unfamiliar humans in familiar and unfamiliar environments. Such a lower reactivity to people could improve ease of handling, animal performance, and animal welfare.