Towards organisational learning enhancement: assessing software engineering practice
Purpose Issues surrounding knowledge management, knowledge transfer and learning within organisations challenge continuity and resilience in the face of changing environments. While initiatives are principally applied within large organisations, there is scope to assess how the processes are handled...
Saved in:
Published in | The learning organization Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 44 - 59 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bradford
Emerald Publishing Limited
08.02.2019
Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose
Issues surrounding knowledge management, knowledge transfer and learning within organisations challenge continuity and resilience in the face of changing environments. While initiatives are principally applied within large organisations, there is scope to assess how the processes are handled within small and medium enterprises and consider how they might be enhanced. This paper aims to present an evaluation of practice within an evolving software development unit to determine what has been learned and how the knowledge acquired has been used to further organisational development. These results provide the basis for the design and implementation of a proposed support tool to enhance professional practice.
Design/methodology/approach
A small software development unit which has successfully delivered bespoke systems since its establishment a number of years ago was selected for analysis. In-depth interviews were carried out with each member of the unit to elicit an understanding of individual and collective development. Interview data were recorded and transcribed and subjected to qualitative analysis to identify key themes underpinning knowledge acquisition and utilisation. Samples of project documentation were scrutinised to corroborate interview data. After analysing the data, a focus-group meeting was held to validate the results and to generate further insights into learning within the unit.
Findings
Qualitative analysis of the data revealed key changes in thinking and practice within the unit, as well as insight into the development of individual and collective contextual knowledge, tacit understanding and learning. This analysis informed the proposal of a bespoke, lightweight, Web-based system to support knowledge capture and organisational learning. This approach has the potential to promote resilience and enhance practice in similar small or start-up enterprises.
Research limitations/implications
Purposeful sampling was used in selecting a small software development unit. This enabled in-depth interviewing of all six members of the organisation. This offered a rich environment from which to derive awareness and understanding of individual and collective knowledge acquisition and learning. Focussing on a single small enterprise limits the extent to which the findings can be generalised. However, the research provides evidence of effective practice and learning and has identified themes for the development of a support tool. This approach can be extended to similar domains to advance research into their learning and development.
Practical implications
Results of the work undertaken so far have generated promising foundations for the proposed support tool. This offers software developers a potentially useful system within which they can reflect upon, and record, key learning events affecting technical, managerial and professional practice.
Originality/value
Small enterprises have limited resources to support organisational learning. The qualitative research undertaken so far has yielded valuable insight into the successful development of a single software development unit. The construction of a support tool to enhance knowledge acquisition and learning has the capacity to consolidate valuable, and potentially scarce, expertise. It also has the potential to facilitate further research to determine how the prototype might be extended or revised to improve its contribution to the unit’s development. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose
Issues surrounding knowledge management, knowledge transfer and learning within organisations challenge continuity and resilience in the face of changing environments. While initiatives are principally applied within large organisations, there is scope to assess how the processes are handled within small and medium enterprises and consider how they might be enhanced. This paper aims to present an evaluation of practice within an evolving software development unit to determine what has been learned and how the knowledge acquired has been used to further organisational development. These results provide the basis for the design and implementation of a proposed support tool to enhance professional practice.
Design/methodology/approach
A small software development unit which has successfully delivered bespoke systems since its establishment a number of years ago was selected for analysis. In-depth interviews were carried out with each member of the unit to elicit an understanding of individual and collective development. Interview data were recorded and transcribed and subjected to qualitative analysis to identify key themes underpinning knowledge acquisition and utilisation. Samples of project documentation were scrutinised to corroborate interview data. After analysing the data, a focus-group meeting was held to validate the results and to generate further insights into learning within the unit.
Findings
Qualitative analysis of the data revealed key changes in thinking and practice within the unit, as well as insight into the development of individual and collective contextual knowledge, tacit understanding and learning. This analysis informed the proposal of a bespoke, lightweight, Web-based system to support knowledge capture and organisational learning. This approach has the potential to promote resilience and enhance practice in similar small or start-up enterprises.
Research limitations/implications
Purposeful sampling was used in selecting a small software development unit. This enabled in-depth interviewing of all six members of the organisation. This offered a rich environment from which to derive awareness and understanding of individual and collective knowledge acquisition and learning. Focussing on a single small enterprise limits the extent to which the findings can be generalised. However, the research provides evidence of effective practice and learning and has identified themes for the development of a support tool. This approach can be extended to similar domains to advance research into their learning and development.
Practical implications
Results of the work undertaken so far have generated promising foundations for the proposed support tool. This offers software developers a potentially useful system within which they can reflect upon, and record, key learning events affecting technical, managerial and professional practice.
Originality/value
Small enterprises have limited resources to support organisational learning. The qualitative research undertaken so far has yielded valuable insight into the successful development of a single software development unit. The construction of a support tool to enhance knowledge acquisition and learning has the capacity to consolidate valuable, and potentially scarce, expertise. It also has the potential to facilitate further research to determine how the prototype might be extended or revised to improve its contribution to the unit’s development. PurposeIssues surrounding knowledge management, knowledge transfer and learning within organisations challenge continuity and resilience in the face of changing environments. While initiatives are principally applied within large organisations, there is scope to assess how the processes are handled within small and medium enterprises and consider how they might be enhanced. This paper aims to present an evaluation of practice within an evolving software development unit to determine what has been learned and how the knowledge acquired has been used to further organisational development. These results provide the basis for the design and implementation of a proposed support tool to enhance professional practice.Design/methodology/approachA small software development unit which has successfully delivered bespoke systems since its establishment a number of years ago was selected for analysis. In-depth interviews were carried out with each member of the unit to elicit an understanding of individual and collective development. Interview data were recorded and transcribed and subjected to qualitative analysis to identify key themes underpinning knowledge acquisition and utilisation. Samples of project documentation were scrutinised to corroborate interview data. After analysing the data, a focus-group meeting was held to validate the results and to generate further insights into learning within the unit.FindingsQualitative analysis of the data revealed key changes in thinking and practice within the unit, as well as insight into the development of individual and collective contextual knowledge, tacit understanding and learning. This analysis informed the proposal of a bespoke, lightweight, Web-based system to support knowledge capture and organisational learning. This approach has the potential to promote resilience and enhance practice in similar small or start-up enterprises.Research limitations/implicationsPurposeful sampling was used in selecting a small software development unit. This enabled in-depth interviewing of all six members of the organisation. This offered a rich environment from which to derive awareness and understanding of individual and collective knowledge acquisition and learning. Focussing on a single small enterprise limits the extent to which the findings can be generalised. However, the research provides evidence of effective practice and learning and has identified themes for the development of a support tool. This approach can be extended to similar domains to advance research into their learning and development.Practical implicationsResults of the work undertaken so far have generated promising foundations for the proposed support tool. This offers software developers a potentially useful system within which they can reflect upon, and record, key learning events affecting technical, managerial and professional practice.Originality/valueSmall enterprises have limited resources to support organisational learning. The qualitative research undertaken so far has yielded valuable insight into the successful development of a single software development unit. The construction of a support tool to enhance knowledge acquisition and learning has the capacity to consolidate valuable, and potentially scarce, expertise. It also has the potential to facilitate further research to determine how the prototype might be extended or revised to improve its contribution to the unit’s development. Purpose: Issues surrounding knowledge management, knowledge transfer and learning within organisations challenge continuity and resilience in the face of changing environments. While initiatives are principally applied within large organisations, there is scope to assess how the processes are handled within small and medium enterprises and consider how they might be enhanced. This paper aims to present an evaluation of practice within an evolving software development unit to determine what has been learned and how the knowledge acquired has been used to further organisational development. These results provide the basis for the design and implementation of a proposed support tool to enhance professional practice. Design/methodology/approach: A small software development unit which has successfully delivered bespoke systems since its establishment a number of years ago was selected for analysis. In-depth interviews were carried out with each member of the unit to elicit an understanding of individual and collective development. Interview data were recorded and transcribed and subjected to qualitative analysis to identify key themes underpinning knowledge acquisition and utilisation. Samples of project documentation were scrutinised to corroborate interview data. After analysing the data, a focus-group meeting was held to validate the results and to generate further insights into learning within the unit. Findings: Qualitative analysis of the data revealed key changes in thinking and practice within the unit, as well as insight into the development of individual and collective contextual knowledge, tacit understanding and learning. This analysis informed the proposal of a bespoke, lightweight, Web-based system to support knowledge capture and organisational learning. This approach has the potential to promote resilience and enhance practice in similar small or start-up enterprises. Research limitations/implications: Purposeful sampling was used in selecting a small software development unit. This enabled in-depth interviewing of all six members of the organisation. This offered a rich environment from which to derive awareness and understanding of individual and collective knowledge acquisition and learning. Focussing on a single small enterprise limits the extent to which the findings can be generalised. However, the research provides evidence of effective practice and learning and has identified themes for the development of a support tool. This approach can be extended to similar domains to advance research into their learning and development. Practical implications: Results of the work undertaken so far have generated promising foundations for the proposed support tool. This offers software developers a potentially useful system within which they can reflect upon, and record, key learning events affecting technical, managerial and professional practice. Originality/value: Small enterprises have limited resources to support organisational learning. The qualitative research undertaken so far has yielded valuable insight into the successful development of a single software development unit. The construction of a support tool to enhance knowledge acquisition and learning has the capacity to consolidate valuable, and potentially scarce, expertise. It also has the potential to facilitate further research to determine how the prototype might be extended or revised to improve its contribution to the unit's development. |
Audience | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
Author | Kerins, John Fannoun, Sufian |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Sufian surname: Fannoun fullname: Fannoun, Sufian email: s.fannoun@chester.ac.uk – sequence: 2 givenname: John surname: Kerins fullname: Kerins, John email: j.kerins@chester.ac.uk |
BackLink | http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1205308$$DView record in ERIC |
BookMark | eNptUUtLAzEQDqJgW717EQqe185kk03iTUp9UehlPYdsNlu3tNmabBH_vVlaBMHTMPM9mPlmTM595x0hNwj3iCBn5XKVgcoooMwAmTojIxRcZkIBPycjUIXKCibYJRnHuAEApBxHpCy7LxPqOO3C2vg2mr7tvNlOt84E3_r11PkP463bOd8_TE2MLsZhHLumT0KX8HXrnQvDcB-M7VvrrshFY7bRXZ_qhLw_Lcr5S7ZcPb_OH5eZzQXvswZYJaRl3AhHUdYSgFpqOZqmQFbRppJV6m2TM4kVWmXBMlVwXufO1IzmE3J39N2H7vPgYq833SGk9aOmKASyQokiseDIsqGLMbhG70O7M-FbI-ghO52y06D0kJ0eskuS26Mk3WV_6Ys3pMBzkAmfnfCdC2Zb_-f45xv5D4XqfJs |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1108_VJIKMS_04_2019_0053 crossref_primary_10_1002_smr_2607 crossref_primary_10_1108_TLO_01_2019_171 crossref_primary_10_1108_TLO_05_2022_0066 crossref_primary_10_1108_TLO_11_2019_0166 crossref_primary_10_1108_CRR_05_2020_0012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e27092 crossref_primary_10_1177_20438869211028855 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcomm_2022_837386 |
Cites_doi | 10.1521/soco.1995.13.3.319 10.1108/13673271211276173 10.4135/9781412984447.n2 10.1109/MS.2002.1003450 10.1108/TLO-07-2015-0035 10.2307/2233763 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033 10.1108/09696470710749263 10.1147/sj.404.01002 10.1080/08109028.2011.565693 10.1177/a014106 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.005 10.1017/S0269888914000198 10.1108/09696470310457469 10.1080/09585192.2010.509625 10.1177/1350507606063441 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.01.008 10.1108/09696471211201506 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.07.008 10.1108/09696470410548836 10.2307/2393553 10.5465/amr.1999.2202135 10.1145/1060710.1060712 10.1142/S0218194011005414 10.1108/00220410610642075 10.1108/09696470610645476 10.1177/0170840600213001 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.025 10.1002/hfm.20300 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y 10.1016/j.jobe.2014.12.001 10.1016/j.omega.2006.06.006 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Emerald Publishing Limited Emerald Publishing Limited 2018 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Emerald Publishing Limited – notice: Emerald Publishing Limited 2018 |
DBID | 7SW BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO ERI PET REK WWN AAYXX CITATION 0-V 0U~ 1-H 7WY 7WZ 7XB 8AO 8FI ABUWG AFKRA ALSLI AZQEC BENPR BEZIV CCPQU CJNVE CNYFK DWQXO E3H F2A FYUFA F~G GNUQQ K6~ L.- L.0 M0C M0P M0T M1O PQBIZ PQEDU PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U |
DOI | 10.1108/TLO-09-2018-0149 |
DatabaseName | ERIC ERIC (Ovid) ERIC ERIC ERIC (Legacy Platform) ERIC( SilverPlatter ) ERIC ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform) Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) ERIC CrossRef ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】 Global News & ABI/Inform Professional Trade PRO ABI/INFORM Collection ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Pharma Collection Hospital Premium Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Business Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Education Collection Library & Information Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Library & Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA) Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA) Health Research Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Business Collection ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Professional Standard ABI/INFORM Global Education Database Healthcare Administration Database Library Science Database One Business ProQuest One Education ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic |
DatabaseTitle | ERIC CrossRef ProQuest One Education ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest One Business ProQuest Central Student Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College Trade PRO ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ABI/INFORM Complete ProQuest Central Global News & ABI/Inform Professional ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ProQuest Library Science Health Research Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Professional Standard ProQuest Central Korea Library & Information Science Collection Business Premium Collection Social Science Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global Education Collection ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Education Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health Management ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest One Education CrossRef ERIC |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: ERI name: ERIC url: https://eric.ed.gov/ sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Business Engineering |
EISSN | 1758-7905 |
ERIC | EJ1205308 |
EndPage | 59 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1108_TLO_09_2018_0149 EJ1205308 10.1108/TLO-09-2018-0149 |
GroupedDBID | 0-V 0R 123 29L 3FY 4.4 5VS 70U 77K 7WY 8AO 8FI 8FW 8R4 8R5 9E0 9F- AADTA AADXL AAGBP AAMCF AAUDR ABIJV ABSDC ABUWG ACGFS ACMTK ADBBV ADOMW AEBZA AEDOK AEUCW AFKRA AIUCU AJEBP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AMPDF APPLU AQUVI ARALO ASMFL ATGMP AUCOK AVELQ AZQEC BBAFP BENPR BEZIV BLEHN BPHCQ BUONS BVXVI CAG CJNVE CNYFK CS3 DWQXO EBS EJD FNNZZ FYUFA GEA GEB GEC GEI GMM GMN GMX GNUQQ GQ. GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE H13 HZ IPNFZ J1Y JI- JL0 K6 M0C M0P M0T M1O MS O9- PQBIZ PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PROAC Q2X Q3A RIG TEM TET TFF TGG TMD TMF TMT V1G VP9 WT Z11 Z12 Z21 ZYZAG .WT 0R~ 1WG 3V. 7SW AAKOT AAPSD ABEAN ABYQI ACDYV ACTSA ADQHX AEMMR AETHF AEZCW AFJGD AFNZV AGTVX AGZLY AIAFM AJFKA ALIPV AMLIN AODMV ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BFQZO BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO BTXLY CCPQU COF EOXHF ERI HZ~ K6~ M42 MORNK MS~ PET PQEDU REK ROL SCAQC SDURG UKHRP WS6 WWN AAYXX CITATION 0U~ 1-H 7XB E3H F2A L.- L.0 Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-f04b78c45a7e218d8002c2c51af614b2fb8bc2ccf3481b1c9c0c49655d3ead423 |
IEDL.DBID | ZYZAG |
ISSN | 0969-6474 |
IngestDate | Thu Oct 10 20:43:58 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 26 16:08:16 EDT 2024 Fri Sep 06 12:39:22 EDT 2024 Tue Oct 26 21:39:52 EDT 2021 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Knowledge engineering Knowledge management Learning organisations Software development Small and medium enterprises SMEs Software engineering |
Language | English |
License | Licensed re-use rights only |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c375t-f04b78c45a7e218d8002c2c51af614b2fb8bc2ccf3481b1c9c0c49655d3ead423 |
OpenAccessLink | https://chesterrep.openrepository.com/bitstream/10034/621763/1/Chester%20Rep-Sufian.pdf |
PQID | 2177146976 |
PQPubID | 25905 |
PageCount | 16 |
ParticipantIDs | emerald_primary_10_1108_TLO-09-2018-0149 eric_primary_EJ1205308 crossref_primary_10_1108_TLO_09_2018_0149 proquest_journals_2177146976 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-02-08 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-02-08 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2019 text: 2019-02-08 day: 08 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Bradford |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Bradford |
PublicationTitle | The learning organization |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
Publisher_xml | – name: Emerald Publishing Limited – name: Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
References | (key2020092514050264300_ref030) 2002 (key2020092514050264300_ref046) 1986 (key2020092514050264300_ref047) 1995; 13 (key2020092514050264300_ref055) 2004; 11 (key2020092514050264300_ref041) 2011 (key2020092514050264300_ref042) 2010; 28 key2020092514050264300_ref060 (key2020092514050264300_ref034) 1997 (key2020092514050264300_ref059) 2014; 29 (key2020092514050264300_ref005) 2011 (key2020092514050264300_ref063) 2008; 36 (key2020092514050264300_ref027) 1995 (key2020092514050264300_ref038) 2016 (key2020092514050264300_ref007) 1997 (key2020092514050264300_ref013) 2014; 16 (key2020092514050264300_ref035) 2007; 14 (key2020092514050264300_ref058) 2011 (key2020092514050264300_ref014) 2006; 13 (key2020092514050264300_ref003) 1978 (key2020092514050264300_ref032) 2016; 1 (key2020092514050264300_ref037) 1983 (key2020092514050264300_ref040) 2011 (key2020092514050264300_ref048) 2014; 56 (key2020092514050264300_ref051) 2012; 16 (key2020092514050264300_ref020) 2015 (key2020092514050264300_ref019) 2000; 21 (key2020092514050264300_ref036) 1994 (key2020092514050264300_ref010) 1990; 35 (key2020092514050264300_ref031) 1975 (key2020092514050264300_ref021) 2015; 58 (key2020092514050264300_ref011) 1999; 24 (key2020092514050264300_ref039) 2013 (key2020092514050264300_ref061) 2006; 62 (key2020092514050264300_ref004) 2015 (key2020092514050264300_ref008) 1996 (key2020092514050264300_ref025) 2006; 37 (key2020092514050264300_ref029) 2011; 21 (key2020092514050264300_ref044) 2011 (key2020092514050264300_ref056) 2011; 38 (key2020092514050264300_ref022) 1994 (key2020092514050264300_ref002) 2006 (key2020092514050264300_ref026) 2017 (key2020092514050264300_ref001) 1999; 1 (key2020092514050264300_ref057) 2016; 23 (key2020092514050264300_ref006) 2012 (key2020092514050264300_ref043) 2011 (key2020092514050264300_ref028) 2015; 42 (key2020092514050264300_ref009) 1989; 99 (key2020092514050264300_ref062) 2001; 40 (key2020092514050264300_ref023) 2005; 48 (key2020092514050264300_ref012) 2012; 85 (key2020092514050264300_ref016) 2015; 1 (key2020092514050264300_ref045) 2003; 10 (key2020092514050264300_ref033) 2002; 19 (key2020092514050264300_ref052) 2011; 29 (key2020092514050264300_ref053) 2010; 21 (key2020092514050264300_ref015) 2003 (key2020092514050264300_ref024) 2000; 53 (key2020092514050264300_ref050) 2013; 4 (key2020092514050264300_ref017) 2018 (key2020092514050264300_ref054) 2011 (key2020092514050264300_ref049) 2013; 23 (key2020092514050264300_ref018) 2012; 19 |
References_xml | – volume-title: Meaning year: 1975 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref031 – volume: 13 start-page: 319 issue: 3 year: 1995 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref047 article-title: A computer network model of human transactive memory publication-title: Social Cognition doi: 10.1521/soco.1995.13.3.319 – volume: 16 start-page: 26 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref013 article-title: Managing knowledge in global software development projects publication-title: IT Professional – volume: 16 start-page: 879 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref051 article-title: Knowledge management in SMEs: a literature review publication-title: Journal of Knowledge Management doi: 10.1108/13673271211276173 – volume-title: Qualitative Data Analysis year: 1994 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref022 – start-page: 21 volume-title: How to Design Survey Studies year: 2003 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref015 doi: 10.4135/9781412984447.n2 – volume: 19 start-page: 26 issue: 3 year: 2002 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref033 article-title: Knowledge management in software engineering publication-title: IEEE Software doi: 10.1109/MS.2002.1003450 – volume: 23 start-page: 202 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref057 article-title: Accelerating tacit knowledge building of client facing consultants: can organizations better support these learning processes? publication-title: The Learning Organization doi: 10.1108/TLO-07-2015-0035 – volume-title: Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management year: 2011 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref044 article-title: A framework for integrating organizational learning, knowledge, capabilities, and absorptive capacity – volume: 99 start-page: 569 issue: 397 year: 1989 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref009 article-title: Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D publication-title: The Economic Journal doi: 10.2307/2233763 – volume: 85 start-page: 1213 issue: 6 year: 2012 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref012 article-title: A decade of agile methodologies: towards explaining agile software development publication-title: Journal of Systems and Software doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033 – volume: 14 start-page: 321 issue: 4 year: 2007 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref035 article-title: Using meta‐abilities and tacit knowledge for developing learning based systems: a case study approach publication-title: The Learning Organization doi: 10.1108/09696470710749263 – volume: 40 start-page: 1002 issue: 4 year: 2001 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref062 article-title: Where did knowledge management come from? publication-title: IBM Systems Journal doi: 10.1147/sj.404.01002 – volume: 29 start-page: 23 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref052 article-title: Knowledge management in practice: insights into a medium-sized enterprise’s exposure to knowledge loss publication-title: Prometheus doi: 10.1080/08109028.2011.565693 – volume-title: Organizational Learning year: 1996 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref008 – volume: 53 start-page: 1287 issue: 10 year: 2000 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref024 article-title: Trust and inter-organizational networking publication-title: Human Relations doi: 10.1177/a014106 – volume-title: The 7th International Conference on Information Technology and Applications year: 2011 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref058 article-title: Towards a semantic social collaborative environment for organizational learning – volume: 28 start-page: 744 issue: 8 year: 2010 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref042 article-title: Project management in small to medium-sized enterprises: matching processes to the nature of the firm publication-title: International Journal of Project Management doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.005 – start-page: 21 volume-title: The Reflective Practitioner How Professionals Think in Action year: 1983 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref037 article-title: From technical rationality to reflection-in-action – volume-title: Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook year: 2013 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref039 – volume: 29 start-page: 496 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref059 article-title: Conceptual modeling for knowledge management to support agile software development publication-title: The Knowledge Engineering Review doi: 10.1017/S0269888914000198 – volume: 10 start-page: 8 issue: 1 year: 2003 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref045 article-title: Organisational learning: a critical review publication-title: The Learning Organization doi: 10.1108/09696470310457469 – volume: 21 start-page: 2218 issue: 12 year: 2010 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref053 article-title: Employee participation in decision making, psychological ownership and knowledge sharing: mediating role of organizational commitment in Taiwanese high-tech organizations publication-title: The International Journal of Human Resource Management doi: 10.1080/09585192.2010.509625 – volume: 37 start-page: 167 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref025 article-title: Sharing knowledge across projects: limits to ICT-led project review practices publication-title: Management Learning doi: 10.1177/1350507606063441 – volume-title: Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management year: 2011 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref043 article-title: Absorptive capacity taking stock of its progress and prospects – volume-title: Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management year: 2011 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref054 article-title: Information technology and the possibilities for knowledge sharing – volume: 56 start-page: 545 issue: 6 year: 2014 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref048 article-title: Knowledge-based approaches in software documentation: a systematic literature review publication-title: Information and Software Technology doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.01.008 – volume-title: The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of a Learning Organization year: 1994 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref036 – volume: 19 start-page: 148 issue: 2 year: 2012 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref018 article-title: New tools for learning: a case of organizational problem analysis derived from debriefing records in a medical center publication-title: The Learning Organization doi: 10.1108/09696471211201506 – volume: 58 start-page: 289 year: 2015 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref021 article-title: Old” theories, “new” technologies: understanding knowledge sharing and learning in Brazilian software development companies publication-title: Information and Software Technology doi: 10.1016/j.infsof.2014.07.008 – volume: 11 start-page: 478 issue: 6 year: 2004 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref055 article-title: An inquiry into the foundations of organizational learning and the learning organization publication-title: The Learning Organization doi: 10.1108/09696470410548836 – volume-title: The Knowledge-Creating Company year: 1995 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref027 – volume-title: Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods year: 2002 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref030 – volume: 35 start-page: 128 issue: 1 year: 1990 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref010 article-title: Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation publication-title: Administrative Science Quarterly doi: 10.2307/2393553 – year: 1986 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref046 article-title: Transactive memory: a contemporary analysis of the group mind – volume: 24 start-page: 522 issue: 3 year: 1999 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref011 article-title: An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution publication-title: Academy of Management Review doi: 10.5465/amr.1999.2202135 – volume-title: Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective year: 1978 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref003 – start-page: 307 year: 2017 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref026 article-title: A study of the scrum master’s role – volume-title: Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning: A Reader year: 2006 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref002 article-title: Organizational memory – volume-title: Developing Business through Developing Individuals year: 1997 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref007 – volume-title: Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management year: 2011 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref041 article-title: How should we understand tacit knowledge? A Phenomenological view – volume: 1 start-page: 1 issue: 7 year: 1999 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref001 article-title: Knowledge management systems: issues, challenges, and benefits publication-title: Communications of the AIS – volume: 48 start-page: 72 issue: 5 year: 2005 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref023 article-title: Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies publication-title: Communications of the ACM doi: 10.1145/1060710.1060712 – volume: 21 start-page: 693 issue: 5 year: 2011 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref029 article-title: Leveraging software reuse with knowledge management in software development publication-title: International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering doi: 10.1142/S0218194011005414 – start-page: 185 volume-title: Theories of Group Behavior ident: key2020092514050264300_ref060 – volume-title: Knowledge Management in Organizations year: 2018 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref017 – start-page: 311 volume-title: International Conference on Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management and Organisational Learning year: 2016 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref038 article-title: Knowledge management in software development: a literature review – volume: 1 start-page: 40 year: 2016 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref032 article-title: Embracing agile publication-title: Harvard Business Review – volume-title: Critical Knowledge Transfer: tools for Managing Your Company’s Deep Smarts year: 2015 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref020 – volume: 62 start-page: 101 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref061 article-title: Knowledge management issues in knowledge‐intensive SMEs publication-title: Journal of Documentation doi: 10.1108/00220410610642075 – volume: 13 start-page: 140 issue: 2 year: 2006 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref014 article-title: Organizational learning, tacit information, and e‐learning: a review publication-title: The Learning Organization doi: 10.1108/09696470610645476 – volume: 21 start-page: 487 issue: 3 year: 2000 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref019 article-title: Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: an integrated framework publication-title: Organization Studies doi: 10.1177/0170840600213001 – volume: 38 start-page: 729 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref056 article-title: Toward a unified knowledge management model for SMEs publication-title: Expert Systems with Applications doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.025 – volume: 23 start-page: 95 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref049 article-title: Critical human factor evaluation of knowledge sharing intention in Taiwanese enterprises’, human publication-title: Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing and Service Industries doi: 10.1002/hfm.20300 – volume: 4 start-page: 167 issue: 8 year: 2013 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref050 article-title: Knowledge management strategyfor SMEs publication-title: International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA) – volume: 42 start-page: 533 issue: 5 year: 2015 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref028 article-title: Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research publication-title: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y – volume-title: Business Object Design and Implementation year: 1997 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref034 article-title: SCRUM development process – volume: 1 start-page: 2 year: 2015 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref016 article-title: How many interviews are enough? Do qualitative interviews in building energy consumption research produce reliable knowledge? publication-title: Journal of Building Engineering doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2014.12.001 – volume: 36 start-page: 221 issue: 2 year: 2008 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref063 article-title: The influence of organizational identification on organizational knowledge management (KM) publication-title: Omega doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.06.006 – volume-title: Social Research Methods Bryman year: 2012 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref006 – volume-title: Knowledge Management Systems and Processes year: 2015 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref004 – volume-title: Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management year: 2011 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref040 article-title: Knowledge assets, capabilities and the theory of the firm – volume-title: Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management year: 2011 ident: key2020092514050264300_ref005 article-title: Dominant logic, knowledge creation, and managerial choice |
SSID | ssj0001251 |
Score | 2.284448 |
Snippet | Purpose
Issues surrounding knowledge management, knowledge transfer and learning within organisations challenge continuity and resilience in the face of... Purpose: Issues surrounding knowledge management, knowledge transfer and learning within organisations challenge continuity and resilience in the face of... PurposeIssues surrounding knowledge management, knowledge transfer and learning within organisations challenge continuity and resilience in the face of... |
SourceID | proquest crossref eric emerald |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 44 |
SubjectTerms | Archives & records Business Collaboration College Faculty College Students Computer Software Data Analysis Engineering Evidence Explicit knowledge Innovations Interpersonal Communication Interviews Job Skills Knowledge acquisition Knowledge Management Management Systems Meetings Organizational learning Professional Development Qualitative research Quality Assurance Quality control Research methodology Sampling Small & medium sized enterprises-SME Small Businesses Software development Software engineering Success Systems development Tacit knowledge Teamwork Workplace Learning |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Library Science Database dbid: M1O link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV07T8MwED5BkRAMPAoV5aUMDDCkTVoncVkQQq2qitIllbpZiWODhJQWki78eu5Spw-EGBgTO06i73x3vifAjVZMacl9OuRENku0Y3OPx7aX6IhL7kglyd4xfPH7YzaYeBNjcMtMWGXJEwtGnUwl2cibqDoHuKtRej7MPmzqGkXeVdNCYxt2qHQZbcyhO1pyYhLeRa09v2P7LGClm9LhzfB5RF5_FH8Uy0WVNNfE0io3dzMGumTThezpHYIov3oRcvLemOdxQ379KOj4_986ggOjllqPCzo6hi2VVmG3jIqvwv5a3cITCMMi2DazFj2hMmNQtEwLildLpW9ETWR5vLeiwq9MtzPk-figwvHlalaZp3UK4143fOrbpj2DLduBl9vaYXHAJfOiQKGikJDqKVvScyONMj9u6ZjHeC015frGruxIR1J1ei9pI_miGleDSjpN1RlYnMtAozRl7aRNqbO4rnJlwHAuSliP1eGuREfMFlU4RHF6cbhAJIXTEYSkICTrcGvg-23qBuh1qBG-y3ndgdtCpuTwOlyWaAmzpzOxgur87-EL2MNXdIrYbn4Jlfxzrq5Qdcnj64I-vwHZMOu9 priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Towards organisational learning enhancement: assessing software engineering practice |
URI | https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/TLO-09-2018-0149/full/html http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1205308 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2177146976 |
Volume | 26 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LT8JAEJ4gJMaLbyKKpAcPeii0sKVbb2hAYxSNgQS5NO12V4xaja0Xf70z2xaD4WLipelju-nOTuebnZ0HwJGSTCrBu7TICUwWKcvkDg9NJ1IBF9wSUpC942bYvRyzq4kzKcGwiIXRbpWZOUbL6ac4oUVqixy3UQrPEw5Q9ZrR9S3t3COEkT8W81pksW7N0teXFahQ4aV2GSrTh2nvYi6bCc519r2uZ3aZy4qNyyW9LQDVT7Tuold0Ibg1Gg024K0YR-aE8tz8TMOm-PqV4vH_BroJ67niavQyTtuCkoy3YbXwm9-B0Ug74CZGVicqyY2MRl6W4tGQ8Yw4jKyRp0ag95rpdoI4gC9KfD7PjGgUsVu7MB70R-eXZl6ywRQd10lNZbHQ5YI5gStReYhIHRVt4diBQj0gbKuQh3gtFMX_hrbwhCUoY70TdZClUbWrQjl-i-UeGJwLVyHCsk7UoXBa7FfawmXYFlHXYTU4KebHf88yc_h6RWNxHwnmW55PBPOJYDU4zmm9rOkCbWtQpRmet-tf2W0UVBavQb2Ycz__zxMfucxFrEGdbv8Pn3MAa3juaedvXody-vEpD1G3ScMGVM76w7v7hl7H4_HGvm3kTPwNgUH2Bg |
link.rule.ids | 220,315,783,787,11951,21401,21722,27937,27938,33757,36188,43818,44399,53278 |
linkProvider | Emerald |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT8JAEJ4oJj4OPlAiPnvwoIdCC1u6eDHGQBB5XErCbdNudzUxAbRw8dc7U7Y8jPHgsd3tts03OzM7T4AbrZjSktfokBPaLNaOzT0e2V6sQy65I5Uke0e3V2sNWHvoDY3BLTFhlRlPTBl1PJZkIy-j6uzjrkbp-TD5sKlrFHlXTQuNTdhipFhT6J7bX3BiEt5prb1a3a4xn2VuSoeXg06fvP4o_iiWiypproilZW7uegx0xqZT2dM8AJF99Tzk5L00m0Yl-fWjoOP_f-sQ9o1aaj3O6egINtQoD9tZVHwe9lbqFh5DEKTBtok17wmVGIOiZVpQvFpq9EbURJbHeytM_cp0O0Gejw8qHF-sZmV5WicwaDaCp5Zt2jPYsup7U1s7LPK5ZF7oK1QUYlI9ZUV6bqhR5kcVHfEIr6WmXN_IlXXpSKpO78VVJF9U4wqQG41H6hQszqWvUZqyalyl1FlcV7nSZzgXJazHinCXoSMm8yocIj29OFwgksKpC0JSEJJFuDXw_TZ1DfQiFAjfxbxG260gU3J4ES4ytITZ04lYQnX29_A17LSCbkd0nnsv57CLr6uncd78AnLTz5m6RDVmGl2ltPoNKG_usw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards+organisational+learning+enhancement%3A+assessing+software+engineering+practice&rft.jtitle=The+learning+organization&rft.au=Fannoun%2C+Sufian&rft.au=Kerins%2C+John&rft.date=2019-02-08&rft.issn=0969-6474&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=59&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108%2FTLO-09-2018-0149&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1108_TLO_09_2018_0149 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0969-6474&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0969-6474&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0969-6474&client=summon |