Post-mortem skeletal survey (PMSS) versus post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) for the detection of corner metaphyseal lesions (CML) in children

Objectives Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mort...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean radiology Vol. 34; no. 9; pp. 5561 - 5569
Main Authors Shelmerdine, Susan Cheng, Davendralingam, Natasha, Langan, Dean, Palm, Liina, Mangham, Chas, Arthurs, Owen J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.09.2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objectives Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT). Methods A 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children’s hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities. Results Twenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p  < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640). Conclusion PMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs. Clinical relevance statement In order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired. Key Points • Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown. • Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT. • Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed.
AbstractList Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT).OBJECTIVESCorner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT).A 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children's hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities.METHODSA 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children's hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities.Twenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640).RESULTSTwenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640).PMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs.CONCLUSIONPMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs.In order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired.CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENTIn order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired.• Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown. • Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT. • Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed.KEY POINTS• Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown. • Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT. • Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed.
Objectives Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT). Methods A 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children’s hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities. Results Twenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p  < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640). Conclusion PMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs. Clinical relevance statement In order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired. Key Points • Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown. • Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT. • Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed.
Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT). A 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children's hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities. Twenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640). PMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs. In order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired. • Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown. • Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT. • Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed.
ObjectivesCorner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT).MethodsA 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children’s hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities.ResultsTwenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640).ConclusionPMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs.Clinical relevance statementIn order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired.Key Points• Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown.• Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT.• Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed.
Author Arthurs, Owen J.
Palm, Liina
Langan, Dean
Mangham, Chas
Shelmerdine, Susan Cheng
Davendralingam, Natasha
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Susan Cheng
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6642-9967
  surname: Shelmerdine
  fullname: Shelmerdine, Susan Cheng
  email: susan.shelmerdine@gosh.nhs.uk
  organization: Department of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Clinical Radiology, St George’s Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Natasha
  surname: Davendralingam
  fullname: Davendralingam, Natasha
  organization: Department of Clinical Radiology, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Dean
  surname: Langan
  fullname: Langan, Dean
  organization: UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Liina
  surname: Palm
  fullname: Palm, Liina
  organization: Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Chas
  surname: Mangham
  fullname: Mangham, Chas
  organization: University of Manchester
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Owen J.
  surname: Arthurs
  fullname: Arthurs, Owen J.
  organization: Department of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38459348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kctu1DAYhS1URC_wAiyQJTYzi4BvGdtLNCoFaSoqtawtJ_ndSUnsYDuV-ho8cT2dVlRddOXbd34fnXOMDnzwgNBHSr5QQuTXRAjnpCJMVJSspK7kG3REBWflqMTBs_0hOk7phhCiqZDv0CFXotZcqCP07yKkXI0hZhhx-gMDZDvgNMdbuMOLi_PLyyW-hZjmhKdnZBvGac7Q4RzGcB3ttH2g11dL7ELEeQu4gwxt7oPHwRU-eoh4LNMLmqD8MUAqjwkv1uebJe49brf90EXw79FbZ4cEHx7XE_T7--nV-ke1-XX2c_1tU7Vc1rnqwDFhNemc1FI0kq-aulGyE5Q65SyztJEr52zDa6Fq1TGlGFdaSlGuWif5CVrs504x_J0hZTP2qYVhsB7CnAzTtSh0iamgn1-gN2GOvrgznGilOaVMF-rTIzU3I3Rmiv1o4515SrsAag-0MaQUwZm2z3aXUY62HwwlZles2RdrSrHmoVizM8teSJ-mvyrie1EqsL-G-N_2K6p7Vu21bg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_025_03461_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_024_06014_3
Cites_doi 10.1007/s00247-020-04845-4
10.1007/s00247-003-0914-9
10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30274-8
10.1007/s00247-013-2813-z
10.2214/ajr.18.20534
10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.013
10.1007/s00247-018-04340-x
10.1111/1754-9485.13271
10.1148/radiol.230344
10.1007/s00247-017-3921-y
10.2214/ajr.11.6540
10.1016/j.jofri.2013.11.004
10.1111/1556-4029.15217
10.1007/s12024-021-00416-7
10.1016/j.crad.2021.09.019
10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160250089028
10.1007/s00247-022-05406-7
10.1007/s00247-016-3568-0
10.2214/ajr.14.13267
10.2214/ajr.22.27729
10.1007/s00247-007-0445-x
10.2214/ajr.14.13126
ContentType Journal Article
Contributor Reid, Catriona
Meshaka, Riwa
Hameed, Shema
Eid, Hadeel
Edwards, Harriet
Laidlow-Singh, Harsimran
Halliday, Katharine
Sande, Joyce
Choa-Go, Joanna Marie
Dodd, Cassandra
Lam, Christopher Z
Spruce, Rebecca
Barber, Joy Louise
Gaunt, Trevor
Davies, Thomas
Kirkbride, Rachael R
Young, Neil
Bevan, Jonathan
Dupre, Mhairi
Savage, Thomas
Colak, Edis
McLoughlin, Emer
Fagan, Aisling
Terrazas, Estefania
Schillizzi, Giuseppe
Kirby, Andrew
Verhagen, Martijn Vincent
Contributor_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Joy Louise
  surname: Barber
  fullname: Barber, Joy Louise
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jonathan
  surname: Bevan
  fullname: Bevan, Jonathan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Joanna Marie
  surname: Choa-Go
  fullname: Choa-Go, Joanna Marie
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Edis
  surname: Colak
  fullname: Colak, Edis
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Thomas
  surname: Davies
  fullname: Davies, Thomas
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Cassandra
  surname: Dodd
  fullname: Dodd, Cassandra
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Mhairi
  surname: Dupre
  fullname: Dupre, Mhairi
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Harriet
  surname: Edwards
  fullname: Edwards, Harriet
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Hadeel
  surname: Eid
  fullname: Eid, Hadeel
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Aisling
  surname: Fagan
  fullname: Fagan, Aisling
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Trevor
  surname: Gaunt
  fullname: Gaunt, Trevor
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Katharine
  surname: Halliday
  fullname: Halliday, Katharine
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Shema
  surname: Hameed
  fullname: Hameed, Shema
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Andrew
  surname: Kirby
  fullname: Kirby, Andrew
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Rachael R
  surname: Kirkbride
  fullname: Kirkbride, Rachael R
– sequence: 16
  givenname: Harsimran
  surname: Laidlow-Singh
  fullname: Laidlow-Singh, Harsimran
– sequence: 17
  givenname: Christopher Z
  surname: Lam
  fullname: Lam, Christopher Z
– sequence: 18
  givenname: Riwa
  surname: Meshaka
  fullname: Meshaka, Riwa
– sequence: 19
  givenname: Emer
  surname: McLoughlin
  fullname: McLoughlin, Emer
– sequence: 20
  givenname: Catriona
  surname: Reid
  fullname: Reid, Catriona
– sequence: 21
  givenname: Joyce
  surname: Sande
  fullname: Sande, Joyce
– sequence: 22
  givenname: Thomas
  surname: Savage
  fullname: Savage, Thomas
– sequence: 23
  givenname: Giuseppe
  surname: Schillizzi
  fullname: Schillizzi, Giuseppe
– sequence: 24
  givenname: Rebecca
  surname: Spruce
  fullname: Spruce, Rebecca
– sequence: 25
  givenname: Estefania
  surname: Terrazas
  fullname: Terrazas, Estefania
– sequence: 26
  givenname: Martijn Vincent
  surname: Verhagen
  fullname: Verhagen, Martijn Vincent
– sequence: 27
  givenname: Neil
  surname: Young
  fullname: Young, Neil
Copyright The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
– notice: 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
CorporateAuthor CORNRD Study Collaborators
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: CORNRD Study Collaborators
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QO
7RV
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ARAPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7P
NAPCQ
P5Z
P62
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s00330-024-10679-7
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Journals
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Biological Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Biological Science Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
ProQuest Central Student
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1432-1084
EndPage 5569
ExternalDocumentID 38459348
10_1007_s00330_024_10679_7
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre
  grantid: NIHR-301322; NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100019256
– fundername: NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre
  grantid: NIHR-301322
– fundername: NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre
  grantid: NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
04C
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
1N0
1SB
2.D
203
28-
29G
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5QI
5VS
67Z
6NX
6PF
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABUWZ
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACREN
ACUDM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADOJX
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADYOE
ADZKW
AEAQA
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AFYQB
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGVAE
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARAPS
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBNVY
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGLVJ
BGNMA
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BMSDO
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECF
ECT
EIHBH
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
EX3
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GXS
H13
HCIFZ
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I-F
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
IWAJR
IXC
IXD
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
LAS
LK8
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
M7P
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NAPCQ
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P19
P2P
P62
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
RNS
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UDS
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
WOW
YLTOR
Z45
Z7R
Z7U
Z7X
Z7Y
Z7Z
Z82
Z83
Z85
Z87
Z88
Z8M
Z8O
Z8R
Z8S
Z8T
Z8V
Z8W
Z8Z
Z91
Z92
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACMFV
ACSTC
ADKFA
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
ABRTQ
ADHKG
AGQPQ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQGLB
7QO
7XB
8FD
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
K9.
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-def24a90df7974b736b5b87d411f8fa2a1b76ffab354858d2882389774ab3cf73
IEDL.DBID U2A
ISSN 1432-1084
0938-7994
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 17:23:16 EDT 2025
Tue Sep 02 03:46:04 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:58:32 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:42:26 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:59:30 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:39:34 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Keywords Radiography
Child abuse
Fractures (bone)
Autopsy
Tomography (X-ray computed)
Language English
License 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c375t-def24a90df7974b736b5b87d411f8fa2a1b76ffab354858d2882389774ab3cf73
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-6642-9967
PMID 38459348
PQID 3098931129
PQPubID 54162
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2954774348
proquest_journals_3098931129
pubmed_primary_38459348
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00330_024_10679_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_10679_7
springer_journals_10_1007_s00330_024_10679_7
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20240900
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 9
  year: 2024
  text: 20240900
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Berlin/Heidelberg
– name: Germany
– name: Heidelberg
PublicationTitle European radiology
PublicationTitleAbbrev Eur Radiol
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur Radiol
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References LoosMHJBakxRDuijstWHigh prevalence of non-accidental trauma among deceased children presenting at Level I trauma centers in the NetherlandsForensic Sci Med Pathol202110.1007/s12024-021-00416-7347735808629892
TsaiACoatsBKleinmanPKBiomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysisPediatr Radiol201710.1007/s00247-017-3921-y28721473
LathropSLWiestPWAndrewsSWCan computed tomography replace or supplement autopsy?J Forensic Sci202310.1111/1556-4029.1521736752321
Sieswerda-HoogendoornTvan RijnRRRobbenSGFClassic metaphyseal lesion following vaginal breech birth, a rare birth traumaJ Forensic Radiol Imaging201410.1016/j.jofri.2013.11.004
ThackerayJDWannemacherJAdlerBHLindbergDMThe classic metaphyseal lesion and traumatic injuryPediatr Radiol201610.1007/s00247-016-3568-026902299
(RCPath), RCoP (2016) Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) Guidelines for the Investigation of Sudden Unexplained Death in Infancy. Available via https://www.rcpath.org/discover-pathology/news/new-guidelines-for-the-investigation-of-sudden-unexpected-death-in-infancy-launched.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2018
Huda W, Abrahams RB (2015) X-ray-based medical imaging and resolution. AJR Am J Roentgenol. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.13126
KleinmanPKPerez-RosselloJMNewtonAWFeldmanHAKleinmanPLPrevalence of the classic metaphyseal lesion in infants at low versus high risk for abuseAJR Am J Roentgenol201110.2214/ajr.11.654021940592
AdamsbaumCDe BoissieuPTeglasJPRey-SalmonCClassic metaphyseal lesions among victims of abuseJ Pediatr201910.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.01331870606
LawsonMTullyJDitchfieldMKuganesanABadawyMKUsing Computed Tomography skeletal surveys to evaluate for occult bony injury in suspected non-accidental injury cases - a preliminary experienceJ Med Imaging Radiat Oncol202210.1111/1754-9485.1327134240551
LysackJTSoboleskiDClassic metaphyseal lesion following external cephalic version and cesarean sectionPediatr Radiol200310.1007/s00247-003-0914-912709748
Leventhal JM, Thomas SA, Rosenfield NS, Markowitz RI (1993) Fractures in young children. Distinguishing child abuse from unintentional injuries. Am J Dis Child. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160250089028
Bailey D, Osborn M, Roberts IR, Rutty G, Traill Z, Morgan B (2021) RCR/RCPath statement on standards for medico-legal post-mortem cross-sectional imaging in adults. . Royal College of Radiologists. Available via https://www.rcr.ac.uk/publication/rcrrcpath-statement-standards-medico-legal-post-mortem-cross-sectional-imaging-adults. Accessed 1 Oct 2023
TsaiAMcDonaldAGRosenbergAEGuptaRKleinmanPKHigh-resolution CT with histopathological correlates of the classic metaphyseal lesion of infant abusePediatr Radiol201410.1007/s00247-013-2813-z24898396
DemehriSBaffourFIKleinJGMusculoskeletal CT imaging: state-of-the-art advancements and future directionsRadiology202310.1148/radiol.2303443790854910613925
Royal College of Radiologists (2017) Royal College of Radiologists and The Society and College of Radiogaphers: The Radiological Investigation of Suspected Physical Abuse in Children. Available via https://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/bfcr174_suspected_physical_abuse.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2018
MeshakaRGarberaDMArthursOJShelmerdineSCValue of additional lateral radiographs in paediatric skeletal surveys for suspected physical abuseClin Radiol202210.1016/j.crad.2021.09.019355047578924471
BrownSDEthical challenges in child abuse: what is the harm of a misdiagnosis?Pediatr Radiol202110.1007/s00247-020-04845-434351495
KarmazynBMarineMBJonesRHRadiologists' diagnostic performance in differentiation of rickets and classic metaphyseal lesions on radiographs: a multicenter studyAJR Am J Roentgenol202210.2214/ajr.22.2772935792137
O'ConnellADonoghueVBCan classic metaphyseal lesions follow uncomplicated caesarean section?Pediatr Radiol200710.1007/s00247-007-0445-x17377786
Royal College of Paediatric and Child Health (2020) Child protection evidence: systematic review on fractures. Available via https://childprotection.rcpch.ac.uk/child-protection-evidence/fractures-systematic-review/. Accessed 02 Sep 2022
SpeelmanACEngel-HillsPCMartinLJvan RijnRROffiahACPostmortem computed tomography plus forensic autopsy for determining the cause of death in child fatalitiesPediatr Radiol202210.1007/s00247-022-05406-735941281
ShelmerdineSCDavendralingamNPalmLDiagnostic accuracy of postmortem CT of children: a retrospective single-center studyAJR Am J Roentgenol201910.2214/ajr.18.2053430917029
ShelmerdineSCLanganDHutchinsonJCChest radiographs versus CT for the detection of rib fractures in children (DRIFT): a diagnostic accuracy observational studyLancet Child Adolesc Health201810.1016/s2352-4642(18)30274-8302495416350458
ThompsonABertocciGKaczorKSmalleyCPierceMCBiomechanical investigation of the classic metaphyseal lesion using an immature porcine modelAJR Am J Roentgenol201510.2214/ajr.14.1326726102380
ShelmerdineSCGerrardCYRaoPJoint European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) and International Society for Forensic Radiology and Imaging (ISFRI) guidelines: paediatric postmortem computed tomography imaging protocolPediatr Radiol201910.1007/s00247-018-04340-x309117816459792
C Adamsbaum (10679_CR10) 2019
MHJ Loos (10679_CR17) 2021
T Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn (10679_CR20) 2014
A O'Connell (10679_CR19) 2007
B Karmazyn (10679_CR11) 2022
AC Speelman (10679_CR5) 2022
10679_CR6
10679_CR7
10679_CR12
SC Shelmerdine (10679_CR4) 2019
A Thompson (10679_CR21) 2015
SC Shelmerdine (10679_CR9) 2018
PK Kleinman (10679_CR13) 2011
10679_CR25
A Tsai (10679_CR22) 2014
R Meshaka (10679_CR15) 2022
M Lawson (10679_CR24) 2022
JD Thackeray (10679_CR14) 2016
SL Lathrop (10679_CR3) 2023
10679_CR1
10679_CR2
JT Lysack (10679_CR18) 2003
SC Shelmerdine (10679_CR8) 2019
SD Brown (10679_CR16) 2021
A Tsai (10679_CR23) 2017
S Demehri (10679_CR26) 2023
References_xml – reference: SpeelmanACEngel-HillsPCMartinLJvan RijnRROffiahACPostmortem computed tomography plus forensic autopsy for determining the cause of death in child fatalitiesPediatr Radiol202210.1007/s00247-022-05406-735941281
– reference: ShelmerdineSCLanganDHutchinsonJCChest radiographs versus CT for the detection of rib fractures in children (DRIFT): a diagnostic accuracy observational studyLancet Child Adolesc Health201810.1016/s2352-4642(18)30274-8302495416350458
– reference: BrownSDEthical challenges in child abuse: what is the harm of a misdiagnosis?Pediatr Radiol202110.1007/s00247-020-04845-434351495
– reference: Sieswerda-HoogendoornTvan RijnRRRobbenSGFClassic metaphyseal lesion following vaginal breech birth, a rare birth traumaJ Forensic Radiol Imaging201410.1016/j.jofri.2013.11.004
– reference: O'ConnellADonoghueVBCan classic metaphyseal lesions follow uncomplicated caesarean section?Pediatr Radiol200710.1007/s00247-007-0445-x17377786
– reference: ThompsonABertocciGKaczorKSmalleyCPierceMCBiomechanical investigation of the classic metaphyseal lesion using an immature porcine modelAJR Am J Roentgenol201510.2214/ajr.14.1326726102380
– reference: Huda W, Abrahams RB (2015) X-ray-based medical imaging and resolution. AJR Am J Roentgenol. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.13126
– reference: KleinmanPKPerez-RosselloJMNewtonAWFeldmanHAKleinmanPLPrevalence of the classic metaphyseal lesion in infants at low versus high risk for abuseAJR Am J Roentgenol201110.2214/ajr.11.654021940592
– reference: KarmazynBMarineMBJonesRHRadiologists' diagnostic performance in differentiation of rickets and classic metaphyseal lesions on radiographs: a multicenter studyAJR Am J Roentgenol202210.2214/ajr.22.2772935792137
– reference: Royal College of Paediatric and Child Health (2020) Child protection evidence: systematic review on fractures. Available via https://childprotection.rcpch.ac.uk/child-protection-evidence/fractures-systematic-review/. Accessed 02 Sep 2022
– reference: LysackJTSoboleskiDClassic metaphyseal lesion following external cephalic version and cesarean sectionPediatr Radiol200310.1007/s00247-003-0914-912709748
– reference: TsaiAMcDonaldAGRosenbergAEGuptaRKleinmanPKHigh-resolution CT with histopathological correlates of the classic metaphyseal lesion of infant abusePediatr Radiol201410.1007/s00247-013-2813-z24898396
– reference: TsaiACoatsBKleinmanPKBiomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysisPediatr Radiol201710.1007/s00247-017-3921-y28721473
– reference: Bailey D, Osborn M, Roberts IR, Rutty G, Traill Z, Morgan B (2021) RCR/RCPath statement on standards for medico-legal post-mortem cross-sectional imaging in adults. . Royal College of Radiologists. Available via https://www.rcr.ac.uk/publication/rcrrcpath-statement-standards-medico-legal-post-mortem-cross-sectional-imaging-adults. Accessed 1 Oct 2023
– reference: AdamsbaumCDe BoissieuPTeglasJPRey-SalmonCClassic metaphyseal lesions among victims of abuseJ Pediatr201910.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.01331870606
– reference: Royal College of Radiologists (2017) Royal College of Radiologists and The Society and College of Radiogaphers: The Radiological Investigation of Suspected Physical Abuse in Children. Available via https://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/bfcr174_suspected_physical_abuse.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2018
– reference: ShelmerdineSCGerrardCYRaoPJoint European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) and International Society for Forensic Radiology and Imaging (ISFRI) guidelines: paediatric postmortem computed tomography imaging protocolPediatr Radiol201910.1007/s00247-018-04340-x309117816459792
– reference: DemehriSBaffourFIKleinJGMusculoskeletal CT imaging: state-of-the-art advancements and future directionsRadiology202310.1148/radiol.2303443790854910613925
– reference: MeshakaRGarberaDMArthursOJShelmerdineSCValue of additional lateral radiographs in paediatric skeletal surveys for suspected physical abuseClin Radiol202210.1016/j.crad.2021.09.019355047578924471
– reference: LoosMHJBakxRDuijstWHigh prevalence of non-accidental trauma among deceased children presenting at Level I trauma centers in the NetherlandsForensic Sci Med Pathol202110.1007/s12024-021-00416-7347735808629892
– reference: ShelmerdineSCDavendralingamNPalmLDiagnostic accuracy of postmortem CT of children: a retrospective single-center studyAJR Am J Roentgenol201910.2214/ajr.18.2053430917029
– reference: Leventhal JM, Thomas SA, Rosenfield NS, Markowitz RI (1993) Fractures in young children. Distinguishing child abuse from unintentional injuries. Am J Dis Child. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160250089028
– reference: LawsonMTullyJDitchfieldMKuganesanABadawyMKUsing Computed Tomography skeletal surveys to evaluate for occult bony injury in suspected non-accidental injury cases - a preliminary experienceJ Med Imaging Radiat Oncol202210.1111/1754-9485.1327134240551
– reference: LathropSLWiestPWAndrewsSWCan computed tomography replace or supplement autopsy?J Forensic Sci202310.1111/1556-4029.1521736752321
– reference: (RCPath), RCoP (2016) Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) Guidelines for the Investigation of Sudden Unexplained Death in Infancy. Available via https://www.rcpath.org/discover-pathology/news/new-guidelines-for-the-investigation-of-sudden-unexpected-death-in-infancy-launched.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2018
– reference: ThackerayJDWannemacherJAdlerBHLindbergDMThe classic metaphyseal lesion and traumatic injuryPediatr Radiol201610.1007/s00247-016-3568-026902299
– year: 2021
  ident: 10679_CR16
  publication-title: Pediatr Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04845-4
– year: 2003
  ident: 10679_CR18
  publication-title: Pediatr Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-0914-9
– year: 2018
  ident: 10679_CR9
  publication-title: Lancet Child Adolesc Health
  doi: 10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30274-8
– ident: 10679_CR2
– year: 2014
  ident: 10679_CR22
  publication-title: Pediatr Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00247-013-2813-z
– ident: 10679_CR6
– year: 2019
  ident: 10679_CR8
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.18.20534
– year: 2019
  ident: 10679_CR10
  publication-title: J Pediatr
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.013
– year: 2019
  ident: 10679_CR4
  publication-title: Pediatr Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-04340-x
– year: 2022
  ident: 10679_CR24
  publication-title: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol
  doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13271
– year: 2023
  ident: 10679_CR26
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.230344
– year: 2017
  ident: 10679_CR23
  publication-title: Pediatr Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3921-y
– year: 2011
  ident: 10679_CR13
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.11.6540
– year: 2014
  ident: 10679_CR20
  publication-title: J Forensic Radiol Imaging
  doi: 10.1016/j.jofri.2013.11.004
– year: 2023
  ident: 10679_CR3
  publication-title: J Forensic Sci
  doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15217
– year: 2021
  ident: 10679_CR17
  publication-title: Forensic Sci Med Pathol
  doi: 10.1007/s12024-021-00416-7
– ident: 10679_CR1
– year: 2022
  ident: 10679_CR15
  publication-title: Clin Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.09.019
– ident: 10679_CR12
  doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160250089028
– year: 2022
  ident: 10679_CR5
  publication-title: Pediatr Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05406-7
– ident: 10679_CR7
– year: 2016
  ident: 10679_CR14
  publication-title: Pediatr Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3568-0
– year: 2015
  ident: 10679_CR21
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.14.13267
– year: 2022
  ident: 10679_CR11
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.22.27729
– year: 2007
  ident: 10679_CR19
  publication-title: Pediatr Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0445-x
– ident: 10679_CR25
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.14.13126
SSID ssj0009147
Score 2.4558275
Snippet Objectives Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is...
Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our...
ObjectivesCorner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 5561
SubjectTerms Accuracy
Autopsy - methods
Bones
Child
Child abuse & neglect
Child Abuse - diagnosis
Child, Preschool
Children
Computed tomography
Cross-Over Studies
Diagnostic Radiology
Fatalities
Female
Fractures
Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging
Histopathology
Humans
Imaging
Infant
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Lesions
Limbs
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neuroradiology
Paediatric
Pediatrics
Postmortem Imaging
Radiographs
Radiography
Radiology
Regression analysis
Regression models
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Surveys
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
Ultrasound
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9swEBdbB2MvZd9L140b7KFhE4st2bKfSgkrZSxj0BbyZiRLgrHGzmKn0H9jf_HuFDnZKOurJcuyT_L97kO_Y-y91KkPlLOFVjmXiN9wz0nPdW6szYUva0sO_dm3_OxSfpln8-hw62Ja5fBPDD9q29bkI_8kJiWqVkIHx8tfnKpGUXQ1ltC4zx4QdRmldKm52pHuJqHAGBrtBVc4oXhoJhydoyJmE44aihOJWsnVv4rpFtq8FSkNCuj0MduPyBFONqJ-wu655il7OIux8WfsN9Xd5YuQPAvdT1QniKuhW6-u3Q0cfZ-dn4-BcjDWHSz_6llvyjpY6NtFpK-m3tOLMSCeBcSHYF0fErYaaD32XzVuBQscnbwiiDPhypHLrYOj6ezrGH40MJwQf84uTz9fTM94rLjAa6GynlvnU6nLifUK7QyjRG4yUygrk8QXXqc6MSr3XhuBhk5W2BTxOSIehJB4qfZKvGB7Tdu4VwycREPTFFZ7hzaczozQRJ2P8q_p7KwbsWT43FUd6cipKsZVtSVSDiKqUERVEFGlRuzD9p7lhozjzt6HgxSruDG7areMRuzdthm3FMVJdOPadVdR6BNfSchixF5upL99nChkVoaWj8Ny2A3-_7kc3D2X1-xRSksx5K4dsr1-tXZvEOz05m1Y0X8As-_5Lg
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Post-mortem skeletal survey (PMSS) versus post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) for the detection of corner metaphyseal lesions (CML) in children
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-024-10679-7
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38459348
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3098931129
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2954774348
Volume 34
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3da9swED_WFsZexrZ-LFsXVOhDwyaILdmyH5OQtGxNKG0D2ZORLAnGGqfEzmD_xv7inRTb3eg22IsF1slfJ_l-p_sCOOUytD7lbCJFTDniN1xz3FIZK61jZtNcuw396Sy-mPOPi2hRB4WVjbd7Y5L0f-o22M2VHetTlCnUpT1LqdiBvcjp7jiL5-HgIdVuwEUdHvPncb-LoEe48pFN1IuayQt4XmNEMtgy9SU8McUreDqtreD78MNV2KVL7yZLyq8oOBBBk3Kz_ma-k7Or6c1Njzhvi01J7n-hzLcFHDSpVss6UbWjHt32CCJXgkiQaFN516yCrCzSrwuzJku8utv_QERJ7ozbXCvJ2Wh62SNfCtLEgh_AfDK-HV3QurYCzZmIKqqNDblM-9oK1CiUYLGKVCI0DwKbWBnKQInYWqkYqjRRokNE4ohtECziqdwKdgi7xaowr4EYjiqlSrS0BrU1GSkmXZJ85HTuomRNB4Lmc2d5nXjc1b-4y9qUyZ5FGbIo8yzKRAfet2Put2k3_kl93HAxq5dgmbF-iljMwckOnLTduHicRUQWZrUpM2fkxFdiPOnA0Zb77e1YwqPU93xopsPDxf_-LG_-j_wtPAvd1PRea8ewW6035h3CnEp1YUcsBB6TyXkX9gaT4XDm2vPPn8bYDsezq-uun_k_AXD6-pM
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3dbtMwFLbGkICbiX8KA4wE0ipm0cROnFwghAqlY82EtE7aXXBiW0KsSdekoL3GHmTPyDlO0oImdrfb2HEcn2Ofz-eXkNdC-dalnI2UDJkA_AZ7TlimwkzrkNs416jQTw7C8ZH4ehwcb5CLLhYG3Sq7M9Ed1LrMUUf-jg9iEK2IDj7MTxlWjULraldCo2GLfXP2G65s1fu9T0DfN74_-jwdjllbVYDlXAY108b6QsUDbSVg6UzyMAuySGrheTayyldeJkNrVcYBzAeR9gGDglQHmASPcis5jHuD3BScx7ijotGXdZJfzxU0G8RwiEhYgDZIx4XqYdG0AQOJyDBpW8zkv4LwErq9ZJl1Am90l2y1SJV-bFjrHtkwxX1yK2lt8Q_IOdb5ZTPnrEurnyC-AMfTarn4Zc7ozrfk8LBP0edjWdH5Xz3zpoyEpnU5a9NlY-_htE8BP1PAo1Sb2jmIFbS00H9RmAWdweiohQFcS08MqvgqujNMJn36o6BdRPpDcnQttHhENouyME8INQIutlmklTVwZ1RBxhWm6gd-yzFW1_SI1y13mrfpz7EKx0m6StzsSJQCiVJHolT2yNvVO_Mm-ceVvbc7KqbtQVCla7btkVerZtjCaJdRhSmXVYqmVvglLqIeedxQf_U5Hokgdi27HTusB___XJ5ePZeX5PZ4mkzSyd7B_jNyx0e2dH5z22SzXizNcwBadfbCcTcl3697O_0BE_w2KQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9MwED-NIU28IP7TMcBIIK0Ca02cxMkDQqij2tg6Tdom9S1zYltCrEnXpKB9DT4On447J2lBE3vba-w4ju_O97PvH8DbQPnWpZyNlYx4gPgNZS6wXEWZ1pGwSa7pQn98FO2dBV8n4WQNfnexMORW2e2JbqPWZU535DtikKBqJXSwY1u3iOPd0afZJacKUmRp7cppNCxyYK5-4vGt-ri_i7R-5_ujL6fDPd5WGOC5kGHNtbF-oJKBthJxdSZFlIVZLHXgeTa2yldeJiNrVSYQ2Iex9hGPooZHyISPcisFjnsH7koReiRjciJXCX89V9xskOCGInEx2oAdF7ZHBdQGHLUjpwRuCZf_KsVrSPealdYpv9EDuN-iVva5YbOHsGaKR7Axbu3yj-EX1fzlU-e4y6rvqMoQ07NqMf9hrtj28fjkpM_I_2NRsdlfPfOmpIRmdTltU2dT7-FpnyGWZohNmTa1cxYrWGmx_7wwczbF0elGBjEuuzB03Vex7eH4sM--FayLTn8CZ7dCi6ewXpSFeQ7MBHjIzWKtrMHzowozoShtP_JeTnG7pgdet9xp3qZCp4ocF-kyibMjUYokSh2JUtmD98t3Zk0ikBt7b3VUTNtNoUpXLNyDN8tmFGey0ajClIsqJbMr_pII4h48a6i__JyIgzBxLR86dlgN_v-5bN48l9ewgYKUHu4fHbyAez5xpXOh24L1er4wLxFz1dkrx9wMzm9bmv4AivI6Vg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Post-mortem+skeletal+survey+%28PMSS%29+versus+post-mortem+computed+tomography+%28PMCT%29+for+the+detection+of+corner+metaphyseal+lesions+%28CML%29+in+children&rft.jtitle=European+radiology&rft.au=Shelmerdine%2C+Susan+Cheng&rft.au=Davendralingam%2C+Natasha&rft.au=Langan%2C+Dean&rft.au=Palm%2C+Liina&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.issn=1432-1084&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=5561&rft.epage=5569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00330-024-10679-7&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s00330_024_10679_7
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1432-1084&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1432-1084&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1432-1084&client=summon