Post-mortem skeletal survey (PMSS) versus post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) for the detection of corner metaphyseal lesions (CML) in children
Objectives Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mort...
Saved in:
Published in | European radiology Vol. 34; no. 9; pp. 5561 - 5569 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Berlin/Heidelberg
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
01.09.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objectives
Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT).
Methods
A 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children’s hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities.
Results
Twenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4,
p
< 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640).
Conclusion
PMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs.
Clinical relevance statement
In order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired.
Key Points
•
Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown.
•
Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT.
•
Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT).OBJECTIVESCorner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT).A 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children's hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities.METHODSA 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children's hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities.Twenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640).RESULTSTwenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640).PMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs.CONCLUSIONPMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs.In order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired.CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENTIn order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired.• Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown. • Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT. • Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed.KEY POINTS• Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown. • Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT. • Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed. Objectives Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT). Methods A 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children’s hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities. Results Twenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640). Conclusion PMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs. Clinical relevance statement In order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired. Key Points • Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown. • Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT. • Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed. Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT). A 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children's hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities. Twenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640). PMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs. In order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired. • Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown. • Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT. • Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed. ObjectivesCorner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our aim was to compare diagnostic accuracy for CML detection on post-mortem skeletal surveys (PMSS, plain radiography) versus post-mortem CT (PMCT).MethodsA 10-year retrospective review was performed at a children’s hospital for patients having PMSS, PMCT and histopathological correlation (reference standard) for suspected CMLs. Twenty-four radiologists independently reported the presence or absence of CMLs in all cases in a blinded randomised cross-over design across two rounds. Logistic regression models were used to compare accuracy between modalities.ResultsTwenty CMLs were reviewed for each of the 10 subjects (200 metaphyses in all). Among them, 20 CMLs were confirmed by bone histopathology. Sensitivity for these CMLs was significantly higher for PMSS (69.6%, 95% CI 61.7 to 76.7) than PMCT (60.5%, 95% CI 51.9 to 68.6). Using PMSS for detection of CMLs would yield one extra correct diagnosis for every 11.1 (95% CI 6.6 to 37.0) fractured bones. In contrast, specificity was higher on PMCT (92.7%, 95% CI 90.3 to 94.5) than PMSS (90.5%, 95% CI 87.6 to 92.8) with an absolute difference of 2.2% (95% CI 1.0 to 3.4, p < 0.001). More fractures were reported collectively by readers on PMSS (785) than on PMCT (640).ConclusionPMSS remains preferable to PMCT for CML evaluation. Any investigation of suspected abuse or unexplained deaths should include radiographs of the limbs to exclude CMLs.Clinical relevance statementIn order to avoid missing evidence that could indicate child abuse as a contributory cause for death in children, radiographs of the limbs should be performed to exclude CMLs, even if a PMCT is being acquired.Key Points• Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are indicative for abuse, but challenging to detect. Skeletal surveys (i.e. radiographs) are standard practice; however, accuracy of CT is unknown.• Sensitivity for CML detection on radiographs is significantly higher than CT.• Investigation of unexplained paediatric deaths should include radiographs to exclude CMLs even if CT is also being performed. |
Author | Arthurs, Owen J. Palm, Liina Langan, Dean Mangham, Chas Shelmerdine, Susan Cheng Davendralingam, Natasha |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Susan Cheng orcidid: 0000-0001-6642-9967 surname: Shelmerdine fullname: Shelmerdine, Susan Cheng email: susan.shelmerdine@gosh.nhs.uk organization: Department of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre, Department of Clinical Radiology, St George’s Hospital – sequence: 2 givenname: Natasha surname: Davendralingam fullname: Davendralingam, Natasha organization: Department of Clinical Radiology, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust – sequence: 3 givenname: Dean surname: Langan fullname: Langan, Dean organization: UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children – sequence: 4 givenname: Liina surname: Palm fullname: Palm, Liina organization: Department of Histopathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children – sequence: 5 givenname: Chas surname: Mangham fullname: Mangham, Chas organization: University of Manchester – sequence: 6 givenname: Owen J. surname: Arthurs fullname: Arthurs, Owen J. organization: Department of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38459348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kctu1DAYhS1URC_wAiyQJTYzi4BvGdtLNCoFaSoqtawtJ_ndSUnsYDuV-ho8cT2dVlRddOXbd34fnXOMDnzwgNBHSr5QQuTXRAjnpCJMVJSspK7kG3REBWflqMTBs_0hOk7phhCiqZDv0CFXotZcqCP07yKkXI0hZhhx-gMDZDvgNMdbuMOLi_PLyyW-hZjmhKdnZBvGac7Q4RzGcB3ttH2g11dL7ELEeQu4gwxt7oPHwRU-eoh4LNMLmqD8MUAqjwkv1uebJe49brf90EXw79FbZ4cEHx7XE_T7--nV-ke1-XX2c_1tU7Vc1rnqwDFhNemc1FI0kq-aulGyE5Q65SyztJEr52zDa6Fq1TGlGFdaSlGuWif5CVrs504x_J0hZTP2qYVhsB7CnAzTtSh0iamgn1-gN2GOvrgznGilOaVMF-rTIzU3I3Rmiv1o4515SrsAag-0MaQUwZm2z3aXUY62HwwlZles2RdrSrHmoVizM8teSJ-mvyrie1EqsL-G-N_2K6p7Vu21bg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00414_025_03461_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00247_024_06014_3 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00247-020-04845-4 10.1007/s00247-003-0914-9 10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30274-8 10.1007/s00247-013-2813-z 10.2214/ajr.18.20534 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.013 10.1007/s00247-018-04340-x 10.1111/1754-9485.13271 10.1148/radiol.230344 10.1007/s00247-017-3921-y 10.2214/ajr.11.6540 10.1016/j.jofri.2013.11.004 10.1111/1556-4029.15217 10.1007/s12024-021-00416-7 10.1016/j.crad.2021.09.019 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160250089028 10.1007/s00247-022-05406-7 10.1007/s00247-016-3568-0 10.2214/ajr.14.13267 10.2214/ajr.22.27729 10.1007/s00247-007-0445-x 10.2214/ajr.14.13126 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Contributor | Reid, Catriona Meshaka, Riwa Hameed, Shema Eid, Hadeel Edwards, Harriet Laidlow-Singh, Harsimran Halliday, Katharine Sande, Joyce Choa-Go, Joanna Marie Dodd, Cassandra Lam, Christopher Z Spruce, Rebecca Barber, Joy Louise Gaunt, Trevor Davies, Thomas Kirkbride, Rachael R Young, Neil Bevan, Jonathan Dupre, Mhairi Savage, Thomas Colak, Edis McLoughlin, Emer Fagan, Aisling Terrazas, Estefania Schillizzi, Giuseppe Kirby, Andrew Verhagen, Martijn Vincent |
Contributor_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Joy Louise surname: Barber fullname: Barber, Joy Louise – sequence: 2 givenname: Jonathan surname: Bevan fullname: Bevan, Jonathan – sequence: 3 givenname: Joanna Marie surname: Choa-Go fullname: Choa-Go, Joanna Marie – sequence: 4 givenname: Edis surname: Colak fullname: Colak, Edis – sequence: 5 givenname: Thomas surname: Davies fullname: Davies, Thomas – sequence: 6 givenname: Cassandra surname: Dodd fullname: Dodd, Cassandra – sequence: 7 givenname: Mhairi surname: Dupre fullname: Dupre, Mhairi – sequence: 8 givenname: Harriet surname: Edwards fullname: Edwards, Harriet – sequence: 9 givenname: Hadeel surname: Eid fullname: Eid, Hadeel – sequence: 10 givenname: Aisling surname: Fagan fullname: Fagan, Aisling – sequence: 11 givenname: Trevor surname: Gaunt fullname: Gaunt, Trevor – sequence: 12 givenname: Katharine surname: Halliday fullname: Halliday, Katharine – sequence: 13 givenname: Shema surname: Hameed fullname: Hameed, Shema – sequence: 14 givenname: Andrew surname: Kirby fullname: Kirby, Andrew – sequence: 15 givenname: Rachael R surname: Kirkbride fullname: Kirkbride, Rachael R – sequence: 16 givenname: Harsimran surname: Laidlow-Singh fullname: Laidlow-Singh, Harsimran – sequence: 17 givenname: Christopher Z surname: Lam fullname: Lam, Christopher Z – sequence: 18 givenname: Riwa surname: Meshaka fullname: Meshaka, Riwa – sequence: 19 givenname: Emer surname: McLoughlin fullname: McLoughlin, Emer – sequence: 20 givenname: Catriona surname: Reid fullname: Reid, Catriona – sequence: 21 givenname: Joyce surname: Sande fullname: Sande, Joyce – sequence: 22 givenname: Thomas surname: Savage fullname: Savage, Thomas – sequence: 23 givenname: Giuseppe surname: Schillizzi fullname: Schillizzi, Giuseppe – sequence: 24 givenname: Rebecca surname: Spruce fullname: Spruce, Rebecca – sequence: 25 givenname: Estefania surname: Terrazas fullname: Terrazas, Estefania – sequence: 26 givenname: Martijn Vincent surname: Verhagen fullname: Verhagen, Martijn Vincent – sequence: 27 givenname: Neil surname: Young fullname: Young, Neil |
Copyright | The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. – notice: 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology. |
CorporateAuthor | CORNRD Study Collaborators |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: CORNRD Study Collaborators |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QO 7RV 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. KB0 LK8 M0S M1P M7P NAPCQ P5Z P62 P64 PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1007/s00330-024-10679-7 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Journals Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Biological Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Biological Science Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Central Student Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE ProQuest Central Student |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1432-1084 |
EndPage | 5569 |
ExternalDocumentID | 38459348 10_1007_s00330_024_10679_7 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre grantid: NIHR-301322; NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100019256 – fundername: NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre grantid: NIHR-301322 – fundername: NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre grantid: NIHR-CDF-2017-10-037 |
GroupedDBID | --- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 04C 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 1N0 1SB 2.D 203 28- 29G 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 36B 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5QI 5VS 67Z 6NX 6PF 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AACDK AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANXM AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAWTL AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABUWZ ABWNU ABXPI ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFO ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACIHN ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPIV ACPRK ACREN ACUDM ACZOJ ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADOJX ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADYOE ADZKW AEAQA AEBTG AEFIE AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFEXP AFJLC AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFYQB AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGDS AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGVAE AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARAPS ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BBNVY BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGLVJ BGNMA BHPHI BKEYQ BMSDO BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 EBD EBLON EBS ECF ECT EIHBH EIOEI EJD EMB EMOBN EN4 ESBYG EX3 F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GRRUI GXS H13 HCIFZ HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I-F I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ IWAJR IXC IXD IXE IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW KPH LAS LK8 LLZTM M1P M4Y M7P MA- N2Q N9A NAPCQ NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OVD P19 P2P P62 P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI RNS ROL RPX RRX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UDS UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WJK WK8 WOW YLTOR Z45 Z7R Z7U Z7X Z7Y Z7Z Z82 Z83 Z85 Z87 Z88 Z8M Z8O Z8R Z8S Z8T Z8V Z8W Z8Z Z91 Z92 ZMTXR ZOVNA ~EX AAPKM AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACMFV ACSTC ADKFA AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AHPBZ AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT ABRTQ ADHKG AGQPQ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB 7QO 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ K9. P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-def24a90df7974b736b5b87d411f8fa2a1b76ffab354858d2882389774ab3cf73 |
IEDL.DBID | U2A |
ISSN | 1432-1084 0938-7994 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 17:23:16 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 02 03:46:04 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:58:32 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:42:26 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:59:30 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:39:34 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 9 |
Keywords | Radiography Child abuse Fractures (bone) Autopsy Tomography (X-ray computed) |
Language | English |
License | 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c375t-def24a90df7974b736b5b87d411f8fa2a1b76ffab354858d2882389774ab3cf73 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-6642-9967 |
PMID | 38459348 |
PQID | 3098931129 |
PQPubID | 54162 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2954774348 proquest_journals_3098931129 pubmed_primary_38459348 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00330_024_10679_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_10679_7 springer_journals_10_1007_s00330_024_10679_7 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 20240900 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 9 year: 2024 text: 20240900 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Berlin/Heidelberg |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Berlin/Heidelberg – name: Germany – name: Heidelberg |
PublicationTitle | European radiology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Eur Radiol |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Eur Radiol |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | LoosMHJBakxRDuijstWHigh prevalence of non-accidental trauma among deceased children presenting at Level I trauma centers in the NetherlandsForensic Sci Med Pathol202110.1007/s12024-021-00416-7347735808629892 TsaiACoatsBKleinmanPKBiomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysisPediatr Radiol201710.1007/s00247-017-3921-y28721473 LathropSLWiestPWAndrewsSWCan computed tomography replace or supplement autopsy?J Forensic Sci202310.1111/1556-4029.1521736752321 Sieswerda-HoogendoornTvan RijnRRRobbenSGFClassic metaphyseal lesion following vaginal breech birth, a rare birth traumaJ Forensic Radiol Imaging201410.1016/j.jofri.2013.11.004 ThackerayJDWannemacherJAdlerBHLindbergDMThe classic metaphyseal lesion and traumatic injuryPediatr Radiol201610.1007/s00247-016-3568-026902299 (RCPath), RCoP (2016) Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) Guidelines for the Investigation of Sudden Unexplained Death in Infancy. Available via https://www.rcpath.org/discover-pathology/news/new-guidelines-for-the-investigation-of-sudden-unexpected-death-in-infancy-launched.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2018 Huda W, Abrahams RB (2015) X-ray-based medical imaging and resolution. AJR Am J Roentgenol. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.13126 KleinmanPKPerez-RosselloJMNewtonAWFeldmanHAKleinmanPLPrevalence of the classic metaphyseal lesion in infants at low versus high risk for abuseAJR Am J Roentgenol201110.2214/ajr.11.654021940592 AdamsbaumCDe BoissieuPTeglasJPRey-SalmonCClassic metaphyseal lesions among victims of abuseJ Pediatr201910.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.01331870606 LawsonMTullyJDitchfieldMKuganesanABadawyMKUsing Computed Tomography skeletal surveys to evaluate for occult bony injury in suspected non-accidental injury cases - a preliminary experienceJ Med Imaging Radiat Oncol202210.1111/1754-9485.1327134240551 LysackJTSoboleskiDClassic metaphyseal lesion following external cephalic version and cesarean sectionPediatr Radiol200310.1007/s00247-003-0914-912709748 Leventhal JM, Thomas SA, Rosenfield NS, Markowitz RI (1993) Fractures in young children. Distinguishing child abuse from unintentional injuries. Am J Dis Child. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160250089028 Bailey D, Osborn M, Roberts IR, Rutty G, Traill Z, Morgan B (2021) RCR/RCPath statement on standards for medico-legal post-mortem cross-sectional imaging in adults. . Royal College of Radiologists. Available via https://www.rcr.ac.uk/publication/rcrrcpath-statement-standards-medico-legal-post-mortem-cross-sectional-imaging-adults. Accessed 1 Oct 2023 TsaiAMcDonaldAGRosenbergAEGuptaRKleinmanPKHigh-resolution CT with histopathological correlates of the classic metaphyseal lesion of infant abusePediatr Radiol201410.1007/s00247-013-2813-z24898396 DemehriSBaffourFIKleinJGMusculoskeletal CT imaging: state-of-the-art advancements and future directionsRadiology202310.1148/radiol.2303443790854910613925 Royal College of Radiologists (2017) Royal College of Radiologists and The Society and College of Radiogaphers: The Radiological Investigation of Suspected Physical Abuse in Children. Available via https://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/bfcr174_suspected_physical_abuse.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2018 MeshakaRGarberaDMArthursOJShelmerdineSCValue of additional lateral radiographs in paediatric skeletal surveys for suspected physical abuseClin Radiol202210.1016/j.crad.2021.09.019355047578924471 BrownSDEthical challenges in child abuse: what is the harm of a misdiagnosis?Pediatr Radiol202110.1007/s00247-020-04845-434351495 KarmazynBMarineMBJonesRHRadiologists' diagnostic performance in differentiation of rickets and classic metaphyseal lesions on radiographs: a multicenter studyAJR Am J Roentgenol202210.2214/ajr.22.2772935792137 O'ConnellADonoghueVBCan classic metaphyseal lesions follow uncomplicated caesarean section?Pediatr Radiol200710.1007/s00247-007-0445-x17377786 Royal College of Paediatric and Child Health (2020) Child protection evidence: systematic review on fractures. Available via https://childprotection.rcpch.ac.uk/child-protection-evidence/fractures-systematic-review/. Accessed 02 Sep 2022 SpeelmanACEngel-HillsPCMartinLJvan RijnRROffiahACPostmortem computed tomography plus forensic autopsy for determining the cause of death in child fatalitiesPediatr Radiol202210.1007/s00247-022-05406-735941281 ShelmerdineSCDavendralingamNPalmLDiagnostic accuracy of postmortem CT of children: a retrospective single-center studyAJR Am J Roentgenol201910.2214/ajr.18.2053430917029 ShelmerdineSCLanganDHutchinsonJCChest radiographs versus CT for the detection of rib fractures in children (DRIFT): a diagnostic accuracy observational studyLancet Child Adolesc Health201810.1016/s2352-4642(18)30274-8302495416350458 ThompsonABertocciGKaczorKSmalleyCPierceMCBiomechanical investigation of the classic metaphyseal lesion using an immature porcine modelAJR Am J Roentgenol201510.2214/ajr.14.1326726102380 ShelmerdineSCGerrardCYRaoPJoint European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) and International Society for Forensic Radiology and Imaging (ISFRI) guidelines: paediatric postmortem computed tomography imaging protocolPediatr Radiol201910.1007/s00247-018-04340-x309117816459792 C Adamsbaum (10679_CR10) 2019 MHJ Loos (10679_CR17) 2021 T Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn (10679_CR20) 2014 A O'Connell (10679_CR19) 2007 B Karmazyn (10679_CR11) 2022 AC Speelman (10679_CR5) 2022 10679_CR6 10679_CR7 10679_CR12 SC Shelmerdine (10679_CR4) 2019 A Thompson (10679_CR21) 2015 SC Shelmerdine (10679_CR9) 2018 PK Kleinman (10679_CR13) 2011 10679_CR25 A Tsai (10679_CR22) 2014 R Meshaka (10679_CR15) 2022 M Lawson (10679_CR24) 2022 JD Thackeray (10679_CR14) 2016 SL Lathrop (10679_CR3) 2023 10679_CR1 10679_CR2 JT Lysack (10679_CR18) 2003 SC Shelmerdine (10679_CR8) 2019 SD Brown (10679_CR16) 2021 A Tsai (10679_CR23) 2017 S Demehri (10679_CR26) 2023 |
References_xml | – reference: SpeelmanACEngel-HillsPCMartinLJvan RijnRROffiahACPostmortem computed tomography plus forensic autopsy for determining the cause of death in child fatalitiesPediatr Radiol202210.1007/s00247-022-05406-735941281 – reference: ShelmerdineSCLanganDHutchinsonJCChest radiographs versus CT for the detection of rib fractures in children (DRIFT): a diagnostic accuracy observational studyLancet Child Adolesc Health201810.1016/s2352-4642(18)30274-8302495416350458 – reference: BrownSDEthical challenges in child abuse: what is the harm of a misdiagnosis?Pediatr Radiol202110.1007/s00247-020-04845-434351495 – reference: Sieswerda-HoogendoornTvan RijnRRRobbenSGFClassic metaphyseal lesion following vaginal breech birth, a rare birth traumaJ Forensic Radiol Imaging201410.1016/j.jofri.2013.11.004 – reference: O'ConnellADonoghueVBCan classic metaphyseal lesions follow uncomplicated caesarean section?Pediatr Radiol200710.1007/s00247-007-0445-x17377786 – reference: ThompsonABertocciGKaczorKSmalleyCPierceMCBiomechanical investigation of the classic metaphyseal lesion using an immature porcine modelAJR Am J Roentgenol201510.2214/ajr.14.1326726102380 – reference: Huda W, Abrahams RB (2015) X-ray-based medical imaging and resolution. AJR Am J Roentgenol. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.13126 – reference: KleinmanPKPerez-RosselloJMNewtonAWFeldmanHAKleinmanPLPrevalence of the classic metaphyseal lesion in infants at low versus high risk for abuseAJR Am J Roentgenol201110.2214/ajr.11.654021940592 – reference: KarmazynBMarineMBJonesRHRadiologists' diagnostic performance in differentiation of rickets and classic metaphyseal lesions on radiographs: a multicenter studyAJR Am J Roentgenol202210.2214/ajr.22.2772935792137 – reference: Royal College of Paediatric and Child Health (2020) Child protection evidence: systematic review on fractures. Available via https://childprotection.rcpch.ac.uk/child-protection-evidence/fractures-systematic-review/. Accessed 02 Sep 2022 – reference: LysackJTSoboleskiDClassic metaphyseal lesion following external cephalic version and cesarean sectionPediatr Radiol200310.1007/s00247-003-0914-912709748 – reference: TsaiAMcDonaldAGRosenbergAEGuptaRKleinmanPKHigh-resolution CT with histopathological correlates of the classic metaphyseal lesion of infant abusePediatr Radiol201410.1007/s00247-013-2813-z24898396 – reference: TsaiACoatsBKleinmanPKBiomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysisPediatr Radiol201710.1007/s00247-017-3921-y28721473 – reference: Bailey D, Osborn M, Roberts IR, Rutty G, Traill Z, Morgan B (2021) RCR/RCPath statement on standards for medico-legal post-mortem cross-sectional imaging in adults. . Royal College of Radiologists. Available via https://www.rcr.ac.uk/publication/rcrrcpath-statement-standards-medico-legal-post-mortem-cross-sectional-imaging-adults. Accessed 1 Oct 2023 – reference: AdamsbaumCDe BoissieuPTeglasJPRey-SalmonCClassic metaphyseal lesions among victims of abuseJ Pediatr201910.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.01331870606 – reference: Royal College of Radiologists (2017) Royal College of Radiologists and The Society and College of Radiogaphers: The Radiological Investigation of Suspected Physical Abuse in Children. Available via https://www.rcr.ac.uk/system/files/publication/field_publication_files/bfcr174_suspected_physical_abuse.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2018 – reference: ShelmerdineSCGerrardCYRaoPJoint European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) and International Society for Forensic Radiology and Imaging (ISFRI) guidelines: paediatric postmortem computed tomography imaging protocolPediatr Radiol201910.1007/s00247-018-04340-x309117816459792 – reference: DemehriSBaffourFIKleinJGMusculoskeletal CT imaging: state-of-the-art advancements and future directionsRadiology202310.1148/radiol.2303443790854910613925 – reference: MeshakaRGarberaDMArthursOJShelmerdineSCValue of additional lateral radiographs in paediatric skeletal surveys for suspected physical abuseClin Radiol202210.1016/j.crad.2021.09.019355047578924471 – reference: LoosMHJBakxRDuijstWHigh prevalence of non-accidental trauma among deceased children presenting at Level I trauma centers in the NetherlandsForensic Sci Med Pathol202110.1007/s12024-021-00416-7347735808629892 – reference: ShelmerdineSCDavendralingamNPalmLDiagnostic accuracy of postmortem CT of children: a retrospective single-center studyAJR Am J Roentgenol201910.2214/ajr.18.2053430917029 – reference: Leventhal JM, Thomas SA, Rosenfield NS, Markowitz RI (1993) Fractures in young children. Distinguishing child abuse from unintentional injuries. Am J Dis Child. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160250089028 – reference: LawsonMTullyJDitchfieldMKuganesanABadawyMKUsing Computed Tomography skeletal surveys to evaluate for occult bony injury in suspected non-accidental injury cases - a preliminary experienceJ Med Imaging Radiat Oncol202210.1111/1754-9485.1327134240551 – reference: LathropSLWiestPWAndrewsSWCan computed tomography replace or supplement autopsy?J Forensic Sci202310.1111/1556-4029.1521736752321 – reference: (RCPath), RCoP (2016) Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) Guidelines for the Investigation of Sudden Unexplained Death in Infancy. Available via https://www.rcpath.org/discover-pathology/news/new-guidelines-for-the-investigation-of-sudden-unexpected-death-in-infancy-launched.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2018 – reference: ThackerayJDWannemacherJAdlerBHLindbergDMThe classic metaphyseal lesion and traumatic injuryPediatr Radiol201610.1007/s00247-016-3568-026902299 – year: 2021 ident: 10679_CR16 publication-title: Pediatr Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04845-4 – year: 2003 ident: 10679_CR18 publication-title: Pediatr Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-0914-9 – year: 2018 ident: 10679_CR9 publication-title: Lancet Child Adolesc Health doi: 10.1016/s2352-4642(18)30274-8 – ident: 10679_CR2 – year: 2014 ident: 10679_CR22 publication-title: Pediatr Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00247-013-2813-z – ident: 10679_CR6 – year: 2019 ident: 10679_CR8 publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/ajr.18.20534 – year: 2019 ident: 10679_CR10 publication-title: J Pediatr doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.02.013 – year: 2019 ident: 10679_CR4 publication-title: Pediatr Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-04340-x – year: 2022 ident: 10679_CR24 publication-title: J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.13271 – year: 2023 ident: 10679_CR26 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.230344 – year: 2017 ident: 10679_CR23 publication-title: Pediatr Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3921-y – year: 2011 ident: 10679_CR13 publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/ajr.11.6540 – year: 2014 ident: 10679_CR20 publication-title: J Forensic Radiol Imaging doi: 10.1016/j.jofri.2013.11.004 – year: 2023 ident: 10679_CR3 publication-title: J Forensic Sci doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.15217 – year: 2021 ident: 10679_CR17 publication-title: Forensic Sci Med Pathol doi: 10.1007/s12024-021-00416-7 – ident: 10679_CR1 – year: 2022 ident: 10679_CR15 publication-title: Clin Radiol doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.09.019 – ident: 10679_CR12 doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160250089028 – year: 2022 ident: 10679_CR5 publication-title: Pediatr Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00247-022-05406-7 – ident: 10679_CR7 – year: 2016 ident: 10679_CR14 publication-title: Pediatr Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3568-0 – year: 2015 ident: 10679_CR21 publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/ajr.14.13267 – year: 2022 ident: 10679_CR11 publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/ajr.22.27729 – year: 2007 ident: 10679_CR19 publication-title: Pediatr Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00247-007-0445-x – ident: 10679_CR25 doi: 10.2214/ajr.14.13126 |
SSID | ssj0009147 |
Score | 2.4558275 |
Snippet | Objectives
Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is... Corner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is unknown. Our... ObjectivesCorner metaphyseal lesions (CMLs) are specific for child abuse but challenging to detect on radiographs. The accuracy of CT for CML detection is... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 5561 |
SubjectTerms | Accuracy Autopsy - methods Bones Child Child abuse & neglect Child Abuse - diagnosis Child, Preschool Children Computed tomography Cross-Over Studies Diagnostic Radiology Fatalities Female Fractures Fractures, Bone - diagnostic imaging Histopathology Humans Imaging Infant Internal Medicine Interventional Radiology Lesions Limbs Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Neuroradiology Paediatric Pediatrics Postmortem Imaging Radiographs Radiography Radiology Regression analysis Regression models Retrospective Studies Sensitivity Sensitivity and Specificity Surveys Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Ultrasound |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9swEBdbB2MvZd9L140b7KFhE4st2bKfSgkrZSxj0BbyZiRLgrHGzmKn0H9jf_HuFDnZKOurJcuyT_L97kO_Y-y91KkPlLOFVjmXiN9wz0nPdW6szYUva0sO_dm3_OxSfpln8-hw62Ja5fBPDD9q29bkI_8kJiWqVkIHx8tfnKpGUXQ1ltC4zx4QdRmldKm52pHuJqHAGBrtBVc4oXhoJhydoyJmE44aihOJWsnVv4rpFtq8FSkNCuj0MduPyBFONqJ-wu655il7OIux8WfsN9Xd5YuQPAvdT1QniKuhW6-u3Q0cfZ-dn4-BcjDWHSz_6llvyjpY6NtFpK-m3tOLMSCeBcSHYF0fErYaaD32XzVuBQscnbwiiDPhypHLrYOj6ezrGH40MJwQf84uTz9fTM94rLjAa6GynlvnU6nLifUK7QyjRG4yUygrk8QXXqc6MSr3XhuBhk5W2BTxOSIehJB4qfZKvGB7Tdu4VwycREPTFFZ7hzaczozQRJ2P8q_p7KwbsWT43FUd6cipKsZVtSVSDiKqUERVEFGlRuzD9p7lhozjzt6HgxSruDG7areMRuzdthm3FMVJdOPadVdR6BNfSchixF5upL99nChkVoaWj8Ny2A3-_7kc3D2X1-xRSksx5K4dsr1-tXZvEOz05m1Y0X8As-_5Lg priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Post-mortem skeletal survey (PMSS) versus post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) for the detection of corner metaphyseal lesions (CML) in children |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-024-10679-7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38459348 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3098931129 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2954774348 |
Volume | 34 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3da9swED_WFsZexrZ-LFsXVOhDwyaILdmyH5OQtGxNKG0D2ZORLAnGGqfEzmD_xv7inRTb3eg22IsF1slfJ_l-p_sCOOUytD7lbCJFTDniN1xz3FIZK61jZtNcuw396Sy-mPOPi2hRB4WVjbd7Y5L0f-o22M2VHetTlCnUpT1LqdiBvcjp7jiL5-HgIdVuwEUdHvPncb-LoEe48pFN1IuayQt4XmNEMtgy9SU8McUreDqtreD78MNV2KVL7yZLyq8oOBBBk3Kz_ma-k7Or6c1Njzhvi01J7n-hzLcFHDSpVss6UbWjHt32CCJXgkiQaFN516yCrCzSrwuzJku8utv_QERJ7ozbXCvJ2Wh62SNfCtLEgh_AfDK-HV3QurYCzZmIKqqNDblM-9oK1CiUYLGKVCI0DwKbWBnKQInYWqkYqjRRokNE4ohtECziqdwKdgi7xaowr4EYjiqlSrS0BrU1GSkmXZJ85HTuomRNB4Lmc2d5nXjc1b-4y9qUyZ5FGbIo8yzKRAfet2Put2k3_kl93HAxq5dgmbF-iljMwckOnLTduHicRUQWZrUpM2fkxFdiPOnA0Zb77e1YwqPU93xopsPDxf_-LG_-j_wtPAvd1PRea8ewW6035h3CnEp1YUcsBB6TyXkX9gaT4XDm2vPPn8bYDsezq-uun_k_AXD6-pM |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3dbtMwFLbGkICbiX8KA4wE0ipm0cROnFwghAqlY82EtE7aXXBiW0KsSdekoL3GHmTPyDlO0oImdrfb2HEcn2Ofz-eXkNdC-dalnI2UDJkA_AZ7TlimwkzrkNs416jQTw7C8ZH4ehwcb5CLLhYG3Sq7M9Ed1LrMUUf-jg9iEK2IDj7MTxlWjULraldCo2GLfXP2G65s1fu9T0DfN74_-jwdjllbVYDlXAY108b6QsUDbSVg6UzyMAuySGrheTayyldeJkNrVcYBzAeR9gGDglQHmASPcis5jHuD3BScx7ijotGXdZJfzxU0G8RwiEhYgDZIx4XqYdG0AQOJyDBpW8zkv4LwErq9ZJl1Am90l2y1SJV-bFjrHtkwxX1yK2lt8Q_IOdb5ZTPnrEurnyC-AMfTarn4Zc7ozrfk8LBP0edjWdH5Xz3zpoyEpnU5a9NlY-_htE8BP1PAo1Sb2jmIFbS00H9RmAWdweiohQFcS08MqvgqujNMJn36o6BdRPpDcnQttHhENouyME8INQIutlmklTVwZ1RBxhWm6gd-yzFW1_SI1y13mrfpz7EKx0m6StzsSJQCiVJHolT2yNvVO_Mm-ceVvbc7KqbtQVCla7btkVerZtjCaJdRhSmXVYqmVvglLqIeedxQf_U5Hokgdi27HTusB___XJ5ePZeX5PZ4mkzSyd7B_jNyx0e2dH5z22SzXizNcwBadfbCcTcl3697O_0BE_w2KQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9MwED-NIU28IP7TMcBIIK0Ca02cxMkDQqij2tg6Tdom9S1zYltCrEnXpKB9DT4On447J2lBE3vba-w4ju_O97PvH8DbQPnWpZyNlYx4gPgNZS6wXEWZ1pGwSa7pQn98FO2dBV8n4WQNfnexMORW2e2JbqPWZU535DtikKBqJXSwY1u3iOPd0afZJacKUmRp7cppNCxyYK5-4vGt-ri_i7R-5_ujL6fDPd5WGOC5kGHNtbF-oJKBthJxdSZFlIVZLHXgeTa2yldeJiNrVSYQ2Iex9hGPooZHyISPcisFjnsH7koReiRjciJXCX89V9xskOCGInEx2oAdF7ZHBdQGHLUjpwRuCZf_KsVrSPealdYpv9EDuN-iVva5YbOHsGaKR7Axbu3yj-EX1fzlU-e4y6rvqMoQ07NqMf9hrtj28fjkpM_I_2NRsdlfPfOmpIRmdTltU2dT7-FpnyGWZohNmTa1cxYrWGmx_7wwczbF0elGBjEuuzB03Vex7eH4sM--FayLTn8CZ7dCi6ewXpSFeQ7MBHjIzWKtrMHzowozoShtP_JeTnG7pgdet9xp3qZCp4ocF-kyibMjUYokSh2JUtmD98t3Zk0ikBt7b3VUTNtNoUpXLNyDN8tmFGey0ajClIsqJbMr_pII4h48a6i__JyIgzBxLR86dlgN_v-5bN48l9ewgYKUHu4fHbyAez5xpXOh24L1er4wLxFz1dkrx9wMzm9bmv4AivI6Vg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Post-mortem+skeletal+survey+%28PMSS%29+versus+post-mortem+computed+tomography+%28PMCT%29+for+the+detection+of+corner+metaphyseal+lesions+%28CML%29+in+children&rft.jtitle=European+radiology&rft.au=Shelmerdine%2C+Susan+Cheng&rft.au=Davendralingam%2C+Natasha&rft.au=Langan%2C+Dean&rft.au=Palm%2C+Liina&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.issn=1432-1084&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=5561&rft.epage=5569&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00330-024-10679-7&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s00330_024_10679_7 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1432-1084&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1432-1084&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1432-1084&client=summon |