Grade 6 Research Process Instruction: An Observation Study

Current literacy standards include students' abilities to conduct research as an inquiry process and to gather, evaluate, and synthesize information from multiple sources. Observation data from 19 grade 6 classrooms were analyzed to describe research process instruction. Results showed that mos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlberta journal of educational research Vol. 47; no. 2; pp. 123 - 140
Main Author Asselin, Marlene
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Edmonton, AB University of Alberta 01.07.2001
University of Alberta, Faculty of Education
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-4805
1923-1857
DOI10.55016/ojs/ajer.v47i2.54853

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Current literacy standards include students' abilities to conduct research as an inquiry process and to gather, evaluate, and synthesize information from multiple sources. Observation data from 19 grade 6 classrooms were analyzed to describe research process instruction. Results showed that most of the teachers used traditional approaches to research tasks, monitored and supported students' procedural work through research projects, and that students used reference and textbooks far more than trade books and other types of texts. Findings suggest that students acquire topic-driven conceptions of the research process, encounter limited points of view about their research topic, and lack sufficient instruction on the cognitive processes of research. Implications for teacher educators and teacher-librarians are offered.
AbstractList Observation data from 19 self-contained sixth-grade Canadian classrooms were analyzed to describe research process instruction. Most teachers used traditional approaches to research tasks. Findings suggest that students acquire topic-driven conceptions of the research process, encounter limited points of view about their research topic, and lack sufficient instruction on cognitive processes of research. (Contains 45 references.) (Author/SV)
Current literacy standards include students' abilities to conduct research as an inquiry process and to gather, evaluate, and synthesize information from multiple sources. Observation data from 19 grade 6 classrooms were analyzed to describe research process instruction. Results showed that most of the teachers used traditional approaches to research tasks, monitored and supported students' procedural work through research projects, and that students used reference and textbooks far more than trade books and other types of texts. Findings suggest that students acquire topic-driven conceptions of the research process, encounter limited points of view about their research topic, and lack sufficient instruction on the cognitive processes of research. Implications for teacher educators and teacher-librarians are offered.
A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning underlies current educational reform. Based on cognitive psychology and social interactionism, constructivism views learning as an active process of solving problems and making meaning that takes place in and is influenced by social contexts (Tharp & Gallimore, 1988). A constructivist approach to teaching is represented by the notion of scaffolding, a term that originally referred to interaction between a child and parent where the parent supported the child "in achieving an intended outcome" (Bruner, 1975, p. 12). Teachers scaffold students' learning in a variety of ways. Forms of instruction include direct instruction, modeling, and providing opportunities for guided practice. Scaffolded instruction is focused on cognitive processes, particularly metacognition, not only on procedures or products of learning. Although the goal of instruction is always independence, the teacher also continually assesses for new needs. Finally, constructivist teaching uses social contexts, such as small groups, to promote learning. Constructivist classrooms feature a language-rich environment, the teacher as coach, and opportunities for higher level thinking, social interaction, and exploration of problems (Brooks & Brooks, 1993). Findings from this study also provide information on the degree and types of constructivist teaching that occur when students are learning research process skills. Although teachers in this study worked in a provincial constructivist curriculum, eight of the 19 who were observed during research project instruction used traditional approaches to learning tasks. Eight of the 11 constructivist teachers used scaffolding strategies, whereas the other three in this group tended to use traditional instruction during research projects. Eight teachers scaffolded students' abilities during both whole-class instruction and independent work times. In contrast, other teachers predominantly gave directions, monitored, and encouraged during research activities. It appears that teachers who provide constructivist learning activities in the language arts may not necessarily transfer this way of teaching to research assignments. Teachers may be more influenced by their own past experiences with research as a series of steps to get through rather than a process requiring specific instructional support. In addition, teachers may not do much research themselves, which would inhibit a process-based understanding. When Tower (2000) drew on her recent personal experience with the research process to help her students, they were able to replicate the process for themselves. Results of this study concur with others (Pitts, 1995) by suggesting that most teachers either assume that students do not require careful scaffolded instruction to proceed through research assignments or are unsure how best to support students. Both literacy and school library programs aim to support students' development of an inquiry-based conception of research and the processes necessary to learn from a variety of sources. Results of this study suggest there is much work to be done in effective classroom instruction of the research process. The research activities that were observed were largely topic- and teacher-driven, and students appeared to be implicitly expected to gather important information about the topic from limited sources. Results of this study suggest students are forming product-based views of the research process that consist of assimilation or transfer of information in contrast to issue-driven inquiries supported by a process-based view of research. However, data for this study are drawn from an investigation designed to capture the scope and breadth of language arts instruction. Results represent a wide-angle rather than in-depth view of some major aspects of research process instruction. Examining products of students' research activities would help illuminate the link between research process instruction and student outcome. Similarly, case studies involving observations of and interviews with teachers, teacher-librarians, and students would enlighten understanding about cognitive processes of research tasks and their instruction and students' resultant conceptions of the research process. Finally, action research focused on both instruction and student work would help teachers and teacher-librarians reflect on how the multiple aspects of teaching research are based in meaningful inquiries and cognitive processes. In sum, findings from this study serve as a starting point for ongoing investigations in explicit and systematic planning of students' inquiry-based learning, how to address metacognition, the teaching and monitoring of students' concept development and making of meaning, the place of language discourse and instructional conversation in promoting independent and interdependent learning, and the importance of authentic topics and tasks for student inquiry.
Author Asselin, Marlene
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Marlene
  surname: Asselin
  fullname: Asselin, Marlene
BackLink http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ631506$$DView record in ERIC
http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1164931$$DView record in Pascal Francis
BookMark eNqFkNtKw0AQhhepYFt9A4Ug3qbdzR6S1KtSaq0UKh6ul8keMKEmdTcp9O1N06LgjVfD8H__DHwD1Cur0iB0Q_CIc0zEuCr8GArjRjsW59GIs4TTM9QnaURDkvC4h_oY4yhkCeYXaOB9gTFhWIg-miwcaBOI4MV4A059BM-uUsb7YFn62jWqzqtyEkzLYJ1543Zw2IPXutH7S3RuYePN1WkO0fvD_G32GK7Wi-VsugoVjXkdZgSYAsh0akiqgUc6yYhNlaZgNSNpZhWk3GAeA44tF3HEiU4YTw2z1EBMh-j2eHfrqq_G-FoWVePK9qWMokSQJMa8he5OEHgFG-ugVLmXW5d_gttLQgRLKWmx6yNmXK5-0vmToIRj0cb8GCtXee-M_T2AZedatq7lwbXsXMvOddu7_9NTed2pqh3km3_a30SViac
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_15332276_2007_11673502
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2001 INIST-CNRS
Copyright University of Alberta, Faculty of Education Summer 2001
Copyright_xml – notice: 2001 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright University of Alberta, Faculty of Education Summer 2001
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7SW
BJH
BNH
BNI
BNJ
BNO
ERI
PET
REK
WWN
IQODW
0-V
3V.
7XB
88B
8FK
8FQ
8FV
ABUWG
AFKRA
AIMQZ
ALSLI
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
CJNVE
DWQXO
GNUQQ
LIQON
M0P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PKEHL
PMKZF
PQEDU
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
DOI 10.55016/ojs/ajer.v47i2.54853
DatabaseName CrossRef
ERIC
ERIC (Ovid)
ERIC
ERIC
ERIC (Legacy Platform)
ERIC( SilverPlatter )
ERIC
ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)
Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)
ERIC
Pascal-Francis
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Education Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database
Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest One Literature
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Education Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Literature
Education Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Digital Collections
ProQuest One Education
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central Basic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ERIC
ProQuest One Education
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
CBCA Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
CBCA Complete
ProQuest Central (New)
Social Science Premium Collection
ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only
Education Collection
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Literature
ProQuest Education Journals
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Digital Collections
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Education Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
DatabaseTitleList ERIC
CrossRef
ProQuest One Education
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ERI
  name: ERIC
  url: https://eric.ed.gov/
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
Psychology
EISSN 1923-1857
ERIC EJ631506
EndPage 140
ExternalDocumentID 347111611
1164931
EJ631506
10_55016_ojs_ajer_v47i2_54853
GeographicLocations Canada
United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Canada
– name: United States--US
GroupedDBID 0-V
1VT
23M
5GY
8FQ
8R4
8R5
AAFWJ
AAOTV
AAYJJ
AAYXX
ABIVO
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACNCT
ADUKH
AEGXH
AFKRA
AIAGR
AIMQZ
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
ARALO
AZQEC
BENPR
BPHCQ
CCPQU
CITATION
CJNVE
DWQXO
EBS
EJD
FRE
FRJ
FRS
GNUQQ
HF~
KWQ
LIQON
M0P
M3F
OHT
P2P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PMKZF
PQEDU
PQQKQ
PROAC
Q2X
SJN
TN5
VJK
WH7
ZCA
-W8
.GO
7SW
AAHSB
AAWJA
AENDU
AFFNX
AI.
BJH
BNH
BNI
BNJ
BNO
EBDIV
EDJ
EFTRF
ERI
HER
H~9
LPU
PET
PUEGO
REK
VH1
WWN
3V.
ABSRN
ERYXR
IQODW
7XB
8FK
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-b1a4caabd9e19da52d8b1f9cd3afd419bfca95e057a07f567251d8459e4f3ea73
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0002-4805
IngestDate Mon Jun 30 05:32:09 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 17 07:08:03 EDT 2024
Tue Sep 02 19:22:38 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:45 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:43:33 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Observation
Teaching method
Research Project
Research Method
Lower Secondary
Information Seeking Behaviour
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c375t-b1a4caabd9e19da52d8b1f9cd3afd419bfca95e057a07f567251d8459e4f3ea73
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
OpenAccessLink https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/ajer/article/download/54853/41910
PQID 228618705
PQPubID 34114
PageCount 18
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_228618705
pascalfrancis_primary_1164931
eric_primary_EJ631506
crossref_primary_10_55016_ojs_ajer_v47i2_54853
crossref_citationtrail_10_55016_ojs_ajer_v47i2_54853
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20010701
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2001-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2001
  text: 20010701
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Edmonton, AB
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Edmonton, AB
– name: Edmonton
PublicationTitle Alberta journal of educational research
PublicationYear 2001
Publisher University of Alberta
University of Alberta, Faculty of Education
Publisher_xml – name: University of Alberta
– name: University of Alberta, Faculty of Education
SSID ssj0014066
Score 1.4983597
Snippet Current literacy standards include students' abilities to conduct research as an inquiry process and to gather, evaluate, and synthesize information from...
Observation data from 19 self-contained sixth-grade Canadian classrooms were analyzed to describe research process instruction. Most teachers used traditional...
A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning underlies current educational reform. Based on cognitive psychology and social interactionism,...
SourceID proquest
pascalfrancis
eric
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 123
SubjectTerms Action research
Canada
Classroom communication
Cognition
Conversation
Curriculum subjects: programmes and methods
Education policy
Educational activities
Educational Change
Educational sciences
Educational Strategies
Elementary School Students
Foreign Countries
Grade 6
Information Literacy
Information Sources
Inquiry method
Intermediate Grades
Intermediate level
Language acquisition
Language arts
Language teaching methods
Learning Strategies
Literacy
Literacy Education
Metacognition
Parent-child relations
Psychology
Research Skills
Scaffolding
Skills
Student Research
Teacher Educators
Teachers
Teaching
Teaching methods
Topics
Working methods
Title Grade 6 Research Process Instruction: An Observation Study
URI http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ631506
https://www.proquest.com/docview/228618705
Volume 47
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3PS8MwFA66XQYiOifWudGD125rfvTHLqKyOQYOEQe7lTRNcUPaug7B_96XNu0Ygp7b5PC95OW95HvfQ-iWKFUnQoRFCKMWxRy2lBcSC1PXCyEN8plU9c7PC2e2pPMVW2luTq5plZVPLBx1lAp1Rz7E2HNsWFzsLvu0VNMo9biqO2gcoyZ4YA9yr-bDZPHyWj8jwGnlVPEv9UasLOGBoNx2hukmH_KN3A6-qLvGA4jcGTk4nDT_-STjOcAVl30ufrns4hyanqFTHUCa96XFz9GRTNqq97LmabRRq_Zp3xdo_LTlkTQdU4v6vJtZWRlgrvfSsWOTJ2Ya1vezZqE520HL6eTtcWbpdgmWIC7bWaHNqeA8jHxp-xFnOPJCO_ZFRHgcUdsPY8EBegjQ-MiNmeNCaBN5lPmSxkRyl1yiRpIm8krxnTCWkgmYSlIqwBPFru-NXMEw55BRG4hWOAVCa4mrlhYfAeQUBbwBwBsoeIMC3qCA10CDelhWimn8N6CjjFD_PJk7REkiGqh3YJX9bJD9-cQ2ULeyUqD3ZB7UK-j6z69d1Cp5ZoqSe4MaYAvZg8BjF_b18uoXSfYPN63YHQ
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ZSwMxEB60fVAQ8cRajzzo47bdHHsIIh7VehURBd9iNptFRdraiuKP8j862UtE0Kc-7yYsM7Mz8yUz3wBsMcvqxJh2GBPc4VThLxVEzKHcDyKEQaEwtt_5sut1bvnZnbibgM-iF8aWVRY-MXXUcV_bM_ImpYHnonGJvcGLY4dG2cvVYoJGZhXn5uMdEdto9_QI1btN6XH75rDj5EMFHM188epEruJaqSgOjRvGStA4iNwk1DFTSczdMEq0wg_ENEa1_ER4PiYAccBFaHjCjPIZ7jsJVc4QyVSgetDuXl2X1xYYHb0i3-ZBS2QtQwgCXK_Zfxo11ZMZNt64_0gbiBQE-xEM83rrmYEaoXqSbK7GrxCRxr3jOZjNE1ayn1nYPEyY3oKd9ZzXhSzAdOlDPxZh52SoYkM8kpMIPZBB1olAHr-paneI6pF-VJ4Hk5TjdgluxyLJZaj0-j2zYuurKDVGaNzKcK7R8yV-GLR8LahSiOBrwAs5SZ1zl9sRGs8SMUwqXonilVa8MhWvTMVbg0a5bJCRd_y3YMkqoXy5feYxS8FYg_UfWvneDdFmyNwa1AstydwHjGRpsat_Pt2Eqc7N5YW8OO2e12E6q3Gz5cBrUEG9mHVMel6jjdzUCNyP27q_AEs2Fho
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grade+6+research+process+instruction%3A+an+observation+study&rft.jtitle=Alberta+journal+of+educational+research&rft.au=Asselin%2C+Marlene&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.pub=University+of+Alberta%2C+Faculty+of+Education&rft.issn=0002-4805&rft.eissn=1923-1857&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=123&rft_id=info:doi/10.55016%2Fojs%2Fajer.v47i2.54853&rft.externalDocID=347111611
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0002-4805&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0002-4805&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0002-4805&client=summon