Clinical effectiveness of contrast medium injection protocols for 80-kV coronary and craniocervical CT angiography—a prospective multicenter observational study

Background and objective Decreasing X-ray tube voltage is an effective way to reduce radiation and contrast dose, especially in non-obese patients. The current study focuses on CTA in non-obese patients to evaluate image quality and feasibility of 80-kV acquisition protocols with varying iodine deli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean radiology Vol. 32; no. 6; pp. 3808 - 3818
Main Authors Wang, Yining, Chen, Yu, Liu, Peijun, Lv, Wan, Wu, Jianlin, Wei, Mengqi, Shi, Dapeng, Wu, Xianheng, Liu, Wenya, Tao, Xiaofeng, Hu, Hongjie, Ma, Xiangxing, Yang, Xiaozheng, Xue, Huadan, Jin, Zhengyu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.06.2022
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background and objective Decreasing X-ray tube voltage is an effective way to reduce radiation and contrast dose, especially in non-obese patients. The current study focuses on CTA in non-obese patients to evaluate image quality and feasibility of 80-kV acquisition protocols with varying iodine delivery rates (IDR) and contrast concentrations in routine clinical practice. Methods A prospective observational study in patients ≥ 18 years and ≤ 90 kg referred for coronary or craniocervical CTA at 10 centers in China (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02840903). Patients were divided into four groups: a standard 100-kV protocol (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.48 gI/s), and three 80-kV protocols (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 0.96gI/s). The primary outcome was contrast opacification of target vascular segments. Secondary outcomes were image quality (contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, visual image quality, and diagnostic confidence assessment), radiation, and iodine dose. Results From July 2016 to July 2017, 1213 patients were enrolled: 614 coronary and 599 craniocervical CTA. The mean contrast opacification was ≥ 300 HU for 80-kV 1.2 gI/s IDR scanned segments; IDR 0.96 gI/s led to lower opacification. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were fair to excellent (≥ 98% of images), despite lower contrast-to-noise ratios and signal-to-noise ratios in 80-kV images. Compared to the standard protocol, 80-kV protocols led to 44–52% radiation dose reductions ( p  < 0.001) and 19% iodine dose reductions ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion Eighty-kilovolt 1.2 gI/s IDR protocols can be recommended for coronary and craniocervical CTA in non-obese patients, reducing radiation and iodine dose without compromising image quality. Key Points • Using low-voltage scanning CTA protocols, in which tube voltage and iodine delivery rate are reduced proportionally (voltage: 80 kV, IDR: 1.2 gI/s), reduces radiation and contrast dose without compromising image quality in routine clinical practice . • Reducing iodine delivery rate beyond direct proportionality to tube voltage is not beneficial .
AbstractList Background and objectiveDecreasing X-ray tube voltage is an effective way to reduce radiation and contrast dose, especially in non-obese patients. The current study focuses on CTA in non-obese patients to evaluate image quality and feasibility of 80-kV acquisition protocols with varying iodine delivery rates (IDR) and contrast concentrations in routine clinical practice.MethodsA prospective observational study in patients ≥ 18 years and ≤ 90 kg referred for coronary or craniocervical CTA at 10 centers in China (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02840903). Patients were divided into four groups: a standard 100-kV protocol (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.48 gI/s), and three 80-kV protocols (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 0.96gI/s). The primary outcome was contrast opacification of target vascular segments. Secondary outcomes were image quality (contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, visual image quality, and diagnostic confidence assessment), radiation, and iodine dose.ResultsFrom July 2016 to July 2017, 1213 patients were enrolled: 614 coronary and 599 craniocervical CTA. The mean contrast opacification was ≥ 300 HU for 80-kV 1.2 gI/s IDR scanned segments; IDR 0.96 gI/s led to lower opacification. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were fair to excellent (≥ 98% of images), despite lower contrast-to-noise ratios and signal-to-noise ratios in 80-kV images. Compared to the standard protocol, 80-kV protocols led to 44–52% radiation dose reductions (p < 0.001) and 19% iodine dose reductions (p < 0.001).ConclusionEighty-kilovolt 1.2 gI/s IDR protocols can be recommended for coronary and craniocervical CTA in non-obese patients, reducing radiation and iodine dose without compromising image quality.Key Points• Using low-voltage scanning CTA protocols, in which tube voltage and iodine delivery rate are reduced proportionally (voltage: 80 kV, IDR: 1.2 gI/s), reduces radiation and contrast dose without compromising image quality in routine clinical practice.• Reducing iodine delivery rate beyond direct proportionality to tube voltage is not beneficial.
Decreasing X-ray tube voltage is an effective way to reduce radiation and contrast dose, especially in non-obese patients. The current study focuses on CTA in non-obese patients to evaluate image quality and feasibility of 80-kV acquisition protocols with varying iodine delivery rates (IDR) and contrast concentrations in routine clinical practice.BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVEDecreasing X-ray tube voltage is an effective way to reduce radiation and contrast dose, especially in non-obese patients. The current study focuses on CTA in non-obese patients to evaluate image quality and feasibility of 80-kV acquisition protocols with varying iodine delivery rates (IDR) and contrast concentrations in routine clinical practice.A prospective observational study in patients ≥ 18 years and ≤ 90 kg referred for coronary or craniocervical CTA at 10 centers in China (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02840903). Patients were divided into four groups: a standard 100-kV protocol (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.48 gI/s), and three 80-kV protocols (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 0.96gI/s). The primary outcome was contrast opacification of target vascular segments. Secondary outcomes were image quality (contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, visual image quality, and diagnostic confidence assessment), radiation, and iodine dose.METHODSA prospective observational study in patients ≥ 18 years and ≤ 90 kg referred for coronary or craniocervical CTA at 10 centers in China (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02840903). Patients were divided into four groups: a standard 100-kV protocol (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.48 gI/s), and three 80-kV protocols (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 0.96gI/s). The primary outcome was contrast opacification of target vascular segments. Secondary outcomes were image quality (contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, visual image quality, and diagnostic confidence assessment), radiation, and iodine dose.From July 2016 to July 2017, 1213 patients were enrolled: 614 coronary and 599 craniocervical CTA. The mean contrast opacification was ≥ 300 HU for 80-kV 1.2 gI/s IDR scanned segments; IDR 0.96 gI/s led to lower opacification. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were fair to excellent (≥ 98% of images), despite lower contrast-to-noise ratios and signal-to-noise ratios in 80-kV images. Compared to the standard protocol, 80-kV protocols led to 44-52% radiation dose reductions (p < 0.001) and 19% iodine dose reductions (p < 0.001).RESULTSFrom July 2016 to July 2017, 1213 patients were enrolled: 614 coronary and 599 craniocervical CTA. The mean contrast opacification was ≥ 300 HU for 80-kV 1.2 gI/s IDR scanned segments; IDR 0.96 gI/s led to lower opacification. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were fair to excellent (≥ 98% of images), despite lower contrast-to-noise ratios and signal-to-noise ratios in 80-kV images. Compared to the standard protocol, 80-kV protocols led to 44-52% radiation dose reductions (p < 0.001) and 19% iodine dose reductions (p < 0.001).Eighty-kilovolt 1.2 gI/s IDR protocols can be recommended for coronary and craniocervical CTA in non-obese patients, reducing radiation and iodine dose without compromising image quality.CONCLUSIONEighty-kilovolt 1.2 gI/s IDR protocols can be recommended for coronary and craniocervical CTA in non-obese patients, reducing radiation and iodine dose without compromising image quality.• Using low-voltage scanning CTA protocols, in which tube voltage and iodine delivery rate are reduced proportionally (voltage: 80 kV, IDR: 1.2 gI/s), reduces radiation and contrast dose without compromising image quality in routine clinical practice. • Reducing iodine delivery rate beyond direct proportionality to tube voltage is not beneficial.KEY POINTS• Using low-voltage scanning CTA protocols, in which tube voltage and iodine delivery rate are reduced proportionally (voltage: 80 kV, IDR: 1.2 gI/s), reduces radiation and contrast dose without compromising image quality in routine clinical practice. • Reducing iodine delivery rate beyond direct proportionality to tube voltage is not beneficial.
Background and objective Decreasing X-ray tube voltage is an effective way to reduce radiation and contrast dose, especially in non-obese patients. The current study focuses on CTA in non-obese patients to evaluate image quality and feasibility of 80-kV acquisition protocols with varying iodine delivery rates (IDR) and contrast concentrations in routine clinical practice. Methods A prospective observational study in patients ≥ 18 years and ≤ 90 kg referred for coronary or craniocervical CTA at 10 centers in China (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02840903). Patients were divided into four groups: a standard 100-kV protocol (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.48 gI/s), and three 80-kV protocols (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 0.96gI/s). The primary outcome was contrast opacification of target vascular segments. Secondary outcomes were image quality (contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, visual image quality, and diagnostic confidence assessment), radiation, and iodine dose. Results From July 2016 to July 2017, 1213 patients were enrolled: 614 coronary and 599 craniocervical CTA. The mean contrast opacification was ≥ 300 HU for 80-kV 1.2 gI/s IDR scanned segments; IDR 0.96 gI/s led to lower opacification. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were fair to excellent (≥ 98% of images), despite lower contrast-to-noise ratios and signal-to-noise ratios in 80-kV images. Compared to the standard protocol, 80-kV protocols led to 44–52% radiation dose reductions ( p  < 0.001) and 19% iodine dose reductions ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion Eighty-kilovolt 1.2 gI/s IDR protocols can be recommended for coronary and craniocervical CTA in non-obese patients, reducing radiation and iodine dose without compromising image quality. Key Points • Using low-voltage scanning CTA protocols, in which tube voltage and iodine delivery rate are reduced proportionally (voltage: 80 kV, IDR: 1.2 gI/s), reduces radiation and contrast dose without compromising image quality in routine clinical practice . • Reducing iodine delivery rate beyond direct proportionality to tube voltage is not beneficial .
Decreasing X-ray tube voltage is an effective way to reduce radiation and contrast dose, especially in non-obese patients. The current study focuses on CTA in non-obese patients to evaluate image quality and feasibility of 80-kV acquisition protocols with varying iodine delivery rates (IDR) and contrast concentrations in routine clinical practice. A prospective observational study in patients ≥ 18 years and ≤ 90 kg referred for coronary or craniocervical CTA at 10 centers in China (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02840903). Patients were divided into four groups: a standard 100-kV protocol (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.48 gI/s), and three 80-kV protocols (370 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 1.2 gI/s; 300 mgI/ml, IDR 0.96gI/s). The primary outcome was contrast opacification of target vascular segments. Secondary outcomes were image quality (contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio, visual image quality, and diagnostic confidence assessment), radiation, and iodine dose. From July 2016 to July 2017, 1213 patients were enrolled: 614 coronary and 599 craniocervical CTA. The mean contrast opacification was ≥ 300 HU for 80-kV 1.2 gI/s IDR scanned segments; IDR 0.96 gI/s led to lower opacification. Image quality and diagnostic confidence were fair to excellent (≥ 98% of images), despite lower contrast-to-noise ratios and signal-to-noise ratios in 80-kV images. Compared to the standard protocol, 80-kV protocols led to 44-52% radiation dose reductions (p < 0.001) and 19% iodine dose reductions (p < 0.001). Eighty-kilovolt 1.2 gI/s IDR protocols can be recommended for coronary and craniocervical CTA in non-obese patients, reducing radiation and iodine dose without compromising image quality. • Using low-voltage scanning CTA protocols, in which tube voltage and iodine delivery rate are reduced proportionally (voltage: 80 kV, IDR: 1.2 gI/s), reduces radiation and contrast dose without compromising image quality in routine clinical practice. • Reducing iodine delivery rate beyond direct proportionality to tube voltage is not beneficial.
Author Tao, Xiaofeng
Jin, Zhengyu
Wu, Jianlin
Ma, Xiangxing
Wang, Yining
Wu, Xianheng
Chen, Yu
Shi, Dapeng
Liu, Peijun
Hu, Hongjie
Liu, Wenya
Lv, Wan
Yang, Xiaozheng
Xue, Huadan
Wei, Mengqi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yining
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Yining
  organization: Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyan Wangfujing District
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yu
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Yu
  organization: Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyan Wangfujing District
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Peijun
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Peijun
  organization: Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyan Wangfujing District
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Wan
  surname: Lv
  fullname: Lv, Wan
  organization: The First People’s Hospital of Yulin
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jianlin
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Jianlin
  organization: Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Mengqi
  surname: Wei
  fullname: Wei, Mengqi
  organization: The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Dapeng
  surname: Shi
  fullname: Shi, Dapeng
  organization: Henan Provincial People’s Hospital
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Xianheng
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Xianheng
  organization: The Second People’s Hospital of Shantou
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Wenya
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Wenya
  organization: The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Xiaofeng
  surname: Tao
  fullname: Tao, Xiaofeng
  organization: Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Hongjie
  surname: Hu
  fullname: Hu, Hongjie
  organization: Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Xiangxing
  surname: Ma
  fullname: Ma, Xiangxing
  organization: Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (Qingdao), North District
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Xiaozheng
  surname: Yang
  fullname: Yang, Xiaozheng
  organization: Medical Affairs, Bayer Healthcare Co. Ltd
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Huadan
  surname: Xue
  fullname: Xue, Huadan
  organization: Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyan Wangfujing District
– sequence: 15
  givenname: Zhengyu
  surname: Jin
  fullname: Jin, Zhengyu
  email: jinzy@pumch.cn
  organization: Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Shuaifuyan Wangfujing District
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35103828$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kc1u3CAUhVGVqPnrC3RRIXWTjdsLGMwsq1H_pEjdJNlaGPCUqQ1TwJFm14foE-TR-iTF4_RHWWQFgu_cc3XOGTrywVuEXhJ4QwCatwmAMaiAkgokB17xZ-iU1IxWBGR99N_9BJ2ltAWAFamb5-iEcQJMUnmK7teD806rAdu-tzq7O-ttSjj0WAefo0oZj9a4acTOb2cgeLyLIQcdhoT7ELGE6tttoWPwKu6x8gbrqLwL2sa7w-j1dXnduLCJavd1_-vHTzWPSLvFD4_TkJ22PtuIQ5eKSs02RZjyZPYX6LhXQ7IvHs5zdPPh_fX6U3X15ePn9burSrOG52pFBdhaUCMMV1QrwbgQpqOSd8Y0lpQPywFIpxRYaZjQoDtGJRjZEw09O0eXy9yy2_fJptyOLmk7DMrbMKWWCloLzkrkBX39CN2GKZaNZ0o0IKloVoV69UBNXcmw3UU3loTaP-kXgC6ALmmkaPu_CIF2rrhdKm5Lxe2h4pYXkXwk0i4fAittueFpKVukqfj4jY3_1n5C9RuSgr7a
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_024_01234_3
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1965_5970
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semvascsurg_2023_04_009
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_024_10648_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40278_022_22622_2
crossref_primary_10_2174_0115734056287292240206115534
crossref_primary_10_3348_kjr_2023_1078
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2160_3154
Cites_doi 10.2214/AJR.14.13957
10.2214/AJR.08.1025
10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.099
10.1007/s00330-019-06196-7
10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840031
10.1148/radiol.2017162779
10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.031
10.18632/oncotarget.16295
10.1111/j.1617-0830.2007.00109.x
10.1007/s00234-014-1393-4
10.1055/s-0042-121609
10.1148/radiol.10090908
10.1016/j.diii.2016.06.005
10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.016
10.1007/s00234-017-1901-4
10.1177/0284185113504753
10.1148/rg.2015150118
10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.012
10.1148/rg.2017170100
10.1056/NEJMoa0901249
10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.022
10.37549/AR2447
10.1186/1475-9276-12-39
10.1007/s10554-010-9754-5
10.21037/cdt.2017.06.07
10.1007/s00330-014-3184-z
10.1097/RLI.0b013e31829979e8
10.1259/bjr.20160567
10.1007/s00330-017-5150-z
10.1258/ar.2011.110359
10.1097/RLI.0000000000000284
10.2214/AJR.11.6787
10.1371/journal.pone.0081486
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022
2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022
– notice: 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
– notice: The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology 2022.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QO
7RV
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ARAPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7P
NAPCQ
P5Z
P62
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s00330-021-08505-5
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
Proquest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Biological Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Biological Science Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Central Student
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1432-1084
EndPage 3818
ExternalDocumentID 35103828
10_1007_s00330_021_08505_5
Genre Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Bayer
  grantid: This study was sponsored by Bayer as a phase IV study.
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004326
– fundername: Bayer
  grantid: This study was sponsored by Bayer as a phase IV study.
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
04C
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
1N0
1SB
2.D
203
28-
29G
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5QI
5VS
67Z
6NX
6PF
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABUWZ
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACIHN
ACIWK
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPIV
ACPRK
ACREN
ACUDM
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADOJX
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADYOE
ADZKW
AEAQA
AEBTG
AEFIE
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFEXP
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AFYQB
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGVAE
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARAPS
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBNVY
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGLVJ
BGNMA
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BMSDO
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECF
ECT
EIHBH
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
EX3
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GXS
H13
HCIFZ
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I-F
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
IWAJR
IXC
IXD
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
LAS
LK8
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
M7P
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NAPCQ
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P19
P2P
P62
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
RNS
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UDS
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
WOW
YLTOR
Z45
Z7R
Z7U
Z7X
Z7Y
Z7Z
Z82
Z83
Z85
Z87
Z88
Z8M
Z8O
Z8R
Z8S
Z8T
Z8V
Z8W
Z8Z
Z91
Z92
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
AAPKM
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACMFV
ACSTC
ADHKG
ADKFA
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AGQPQ
AHPBZ
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
7XB
8FD
8FK
ABRTQ
AZQEC
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
K9.
P64
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-9260e462d6d5a2ca63566db285bdd7e12d6e5001baa0e8d36c0cb3280d8f1c0f3
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1432-1084
0938-7994
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 17:35:17 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 18:59:43 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:04:03 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:56 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:08:29 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:45:29 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Computed tomography angiography
Signal-to-noise ratio
Radiation dosage
Contrast media
Language English
License 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c375t-9260e462d6d5a2ca63566db285bdd7e12d6e5001baa0e8d36c0cb3280d8f1c0f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 35103828
PQID 2667082679
PQPubID 54162
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2624653330
proquest_journals_2667082679
pubmed_primary_35103828
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_021_08505_5
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s00330_021_08505_5
springer_journals_10_1007_s00330_021_08505_5
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20220600
2022-06-00
2022-Jun
20220601
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 6
  year: 2022
  text: 20220600
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Berlin/Heidelberg
– name: Germany
– name: Heidelberg
PublicationTitle European radiology
PublicationTitleAbbrev Eur Radiol
PublicationTitleAlternate Eur Radiol
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Ghekiere, Salgado, Buls (CR11) 2017; 90
He, Yu, Chen (CR37) 2013; 12
Trattner, Pearson, Chin (CR9) 2014; 11
Mortele, Oliva, Ondategui, Ros, Silverman (CR24) 2005; 184
Mihl, Wildberger, Jurencak (CR32) 2013; 48
Cai, Hu, Hu (CR5) 2018; 73
Luo, Zhang, Meinel (CR20) 2014; 24
CR38
Feuchtner, Jodocy, Klauser (CR29) 2010; 75
Kok, Mihl, Hendriks (CR33) 2016; 51
Chen, Chen, Zhou, Liu, Huang (CR36) 2017; 8
Kalra, Sodickson, Mayo-Smith (CR10) 2015; 35
Albrecht, Nance, Schoepf (CR8) 2018; 28
May, Kramer, Eller (CR21) 2014; 56
Kalisz, Halliburton, Abbara (CR3) 2017; 37
Palkowitsch, Bostelmann, Lengsfeld (CR26) 2014; 55
Kok, Mihl, Hendriks (CR18) 2016; 85
Pflederer, Rudofsky, Ropers (CR28) 2009; 192
Fazel, Krumholz, Wang (CR7) 2009; 361
Xin, Shao, Wang (CR35) 2018; 21
Bae (CR1) 2010; 256
Zhang, Zhang, Yan, Xu, Yu, Wang (CR30) 2011; 27
CR27
Wei, Li, Gao, Liu, Ma (CR19) 2016; 71
Chen, Zhang, Xue (CR6) 2017; 59
Mihl, Kok, Wildberger (CR14) 2015; 84
Mihl, Maas, Turek (CR15) 2017; 189
CR23
CR22
Palkowitsch, Lengsfeld, Stauch (CR25) 2012; 53
Kayan, Demirtas, Türker (CR31) 2016; 97
Kok, Mihl, Seehofnerova (CR13) 2015; 205
De Cecco, Schoepf (CR17) 2018; 47
Lubbers, Kock, Niezen (CR4) 2018; 286
Scholtz, Ghoshhajra (CR16) 2017; 7
Alkadhi, Schindera (CR12) 2011; 80
Wildberger, Mahnken, Seidensticker (CR2) 2008; 11
Rengo, Dharampal, Lubbers (CR34) 2019; 29
8505_CR22
8505_CR23
M Kok (8505_CR18) 2016; 85
S Trattner (8505_CR9) 2014; 11
CN De Cecco (8505_CR17) 2018; 47
O Ghekiere (8505_CR11) 2017; 90
KT Bae (8505_CR1) 2010; 256
C Zhang (8505_CR30) 2011; 27
L Wei (8505_CR19) 2016; 71
MS May (8505_CR21) 2014; 56
GM Feuchtner (8505_CR29) 2010; 75
C Mihl (8505_CR32) 2013; 48
C Mihl (8505_CR14) 2015; 84
M Rengo (8505_CR34) 2019; 29
S Luo (8505_CR20) 2014; 24
M Kok (8505_CR13) 2015; 205
M Kok (8505_CR33) 2016; 51
PK Palkowitsch (8505_CR26) 2014; 55
8505_CR27
MH Albrecht (8505_CR8) 2018; 28
Y Chen (8505_CR6) 2017; 59
W Cai (8505_CR5) 2018; 73
MK Kalra (8505_CR10) 2015; 35
T Pflederer (8505_CR28) 2009; 192
K Kalisz (8505_CR3) 2017; 37
M Kayan (8505_CR31) 2016; 97
Y Chen (8505_CR36) 2017; 8
MM Lubbers (8505_CR4) 2018; 286
KJ Mortele (8505_CR24) 2005; 184
C Mihl (8505_CR15) 2017; 189
D He (8505_CR37) 2013; 12
WC Xin (8505_CR35) 2018; 21
P Palkowitsch (8505_CR25) 2012; 53
R Fazel (8505_CR7) 2009; 361
H Alkadhi (8505_CR12) 2011; 80
JE Scholtz (8505_CR16) 2017; 7
JE Wildberger (8505_CR2) 2008; 11
8505_CR38
References_xml – ident: CR22
– volume: 205
  start-page: 1332
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1338
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Automated tube voltage selection for radiation dose reduction in CT angiography using different contrast media concentrations and a constant iodine delivery rate
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13957
– volume: 192
  start-page: 1045
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1050
  ident: CR28
  article-title: Image quality in a low radiation exposure protocol for retrospectively ECG-gated coronary CT angiography
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1025
– volume: 80
  start-page: 36
  year: 2011
  end-page: 40
  ident: CR12
  article-title: State of the art low-dose CT angiography of the body
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.099
– volume: 29
  start-page: 6109
  year: 2019
  end-page: 6118
  ident: CR34
  article-title: Impact of iodine concentration and iodine delivery rate on contrast enhancement in coronary CT angiography: a randomized multicenter trial (CT-CON)
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06196-7
– volume: 184
  start-page: 31
  year: 2005
  end-page: 34
  ident: CR24
  article-title: Universal use of nonionic iodinated contrast medium for CT: evaluation of safety in a large urban teaching hospital
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840031
– volume: 286
  start-page: 71
  year: 2018
  end-page: 80
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Iodixanol versus iopromide at coronary CT angiography: lumen opacification and effect on heart rhythm-the Randomized IsoCOR Trial
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162779
– volume: 73
  start-page: e211
  issue: 217
  year: 2018
  end-page: e217 e216
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Feasibility study of iterative model reconstruction combined with low tube voltage, low iodine load, and low iodine delivery rate in craniocervical CT angiography
  publication-title: Clin Radiol
– volume: 21
  start-page: 48
  year: 2018
  end-page: 54
  ident: CR35
  article-title: Is there an incremental value to use myocardial perfusion imaging with or without CT attenuation for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease? A study in Chinese patients
  publication-title: Hell J Nucl Med
– volume: 84
  start-page: 2155
  year: 2015
  end-page: 2160
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Coronary CT angiography using low concentrated contrast media injected with high flow rates: feasible in clinical practice
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.031
– volume: 8
  start-page: 64417
  year: 2017
  end-page: 64426
  ident: CR36
  article-title: Report on the development and application of PET/CT in mainland China
  publication-title: Oncotarget
  doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16295
– volume: 11
  start-page: 8
  year: 2008
  end-page: 12
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Aorto-peripheral MDCT angiography: implications for contrast medium delivery
  publication-title: Imaging Decisions MRI
  doi: 10.1111/j.1617-0830.2007.00109.x
– volume: 56
  start-page: 797
  year: 2014
  end-page: 803
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Automated tube voltage adaptation in head and neck computed tomography between 120 and 100 kV: effects on image quality and radiation dose
  publication-title: Neuroradiology
  doi: 10.1007/s00234-014-1393-4
– volume: 189
  start-page: 312
  year: 2017
  end-page: 325
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Contrast media administration in coronary computed tomography angiography - a systematic review
  publication-title: Rofo
  doi: 10.1055/s-0042-121609
– volume: 256
  start-page: 32
  year: 2010
  end-page: 61
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090908
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1173
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1179
  ident: CR31
  article-title: Carotid and cerebral CT angiography using low volume of iodinated contrast material and low tube voltage
  publication-title: Diagn Interv Imaging
  doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.06.005
– volume: 11
  start-page: 271
  year: 2014
  end-page: 278
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Standardization and optimization of CT protocols to achieve low dose
  publication-title: J Am Coll Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.016
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1071
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1081
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Head and neck angiography at 70 kVp with a third-generation dual-source CT system in patients: comparison with 100 kVp
  publication-title: Neuroradiology
  doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1901-4
– volume: 55
  start-page: 707
  year: 2014
  end-page: 714
  ident: CR26
  article-title: Safety and tolerability of iopromide intravascular use: a pooled analysis of three non-interventional studies in 132,012 patients
  publication-title: Acta Radiol
  doi: 10.1177/0284185113504753
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1706
  year: 2015
  end-page: 1721
  ident: CR10
  article-title: CT radiation: key concepts for gentle and wide use
  publication-title: Radiographics
  doi: 10.1148/rg.2015150118
– ident: CR27
– volume: 75
  start-page: e51
  year: 2010
  end-page: 56
  ident: CR29
  article-title: Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.012
– ident: CR23
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1955
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1974
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Update on cardiovascular applications of multienergy CT
  publication-title: Radiographics
  doi: 10.1148/rg.2017170100
– volume: 361
  start-page: 849
  year: 2009
  end-page: 857
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901249
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1068
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1074
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Optimizing contrast media application in coronary CT angiography at lower tube voltage: evaluation in a circulation phantom and sixty patients
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.022
– volume: 47
  start-page: 7
  year: 2018
  end-page: 11
  ident: CR17
  article-title: New contrast injection strategies for low kV and keV imaging
  publication-title: Appl Radiol
  doi: 10.37549/AR2447
– ident: CR38
– volume: 12
  start-page: 39
  year: 2013
  ident: CR37
  article-title: Equity in the distribution of CT and MRI in China: a panel analysis
  publication-title: Int J Equity Health
  doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-39
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1059
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1068
  ident: CR30
  article-title: 320-row CT coronary angiography: effect of 100-kV tube voltages on image quality, contrast volume, and radiation dose
  publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9754-5
– volume: 7
  start-page: 439
  year: 2017
  end-page: 451
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Advances in cardiac CT contrast injection and acquisition protocols
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther
  doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.06.07
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1677
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1685
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Low tube voltage and low contrast material volume cerebral CT angiography
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3184-z
– volume: 48
  start-page: 813
  year: 2013
  end-page: 818
  ident: CR32
  article-title: Intravascular enhancement with identical iodine delivery rate using different iodine contrast media in a circulation phantom
  publication-title: Invest Radiol
  doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31829979e8
– volume: 90
  start-page: 20160567
  year: 2017
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Image quality in coronary CT angiography: challenges and technical solutions
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
  doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160567
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2134
  year: 2018
  end-page: 2142
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of low and high tube voltage coronary CT angiography using an X-ray tube potential-tailored contrast medium injection protocol
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5150-z
– volume: 71
  start-page: e1315
  issue: 1313
  year: 2016
  end-page: 1313.e1310
  ident: CR19
  article-title: Use of low tube voltage and low contrast agent concentration yields good image quality for aortic CT angiography
  publication-title: Clin Radiol
– volume: 53
  start-page: 179
  year: 2012
  end-page: 186
  ident: CR25
  article-title: Safety and diagnostic image quality of iopromide: results of a large non-interventional observational study of European and Asian patients (IMAGE)
  publication-title: Acta Radiol
  doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110359
– volume: 51
  start-page: 810
  year: 2016
  end-page: 815
  ident: CR33
  article-title: Patient comfort during contrast media injection in coronary computed tomographic angiography using varying contrast media concentrations and flow rates: results from the EICAR Trial
  publication-title: Invest Radiol
  doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000284
– volume: 90
  start-page: 20160567
  year: 2017
  ident: 8505_CR11
  publication-title: Br J Radiol
  doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160567
– volume: 27
  start-page: 1059
  year: 2011
  ident: 8505_CR30
  publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9754-5
– volume: 48
  start-page: 813
  year: 2013
  ident: 8505_CR32
  publication-title: Invest Radiol
  doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31829979e8
– volume: 47
  start-page: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: 8505_CR17
  publication-title: Appl Radiol
  doi: 10.37549/AR2447
– volume: 71
  start-page: e1315
  issue: 1313
  year: 2016
  ident: 8505_CR19
  publication-title: Clin Radiol
– volume: 51
  start-page: 810
  year: 2016
  ident: 8505_CR33
  publication-title: Invest Radiol
  doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000284
– ident: 8505_CR23
– volume: 55
  start-page: 707
  year: 2014
  ident: 8505_CR26
  publication-title: Acta Radiol
  doi: 10.1177/0284185113504753
– ident: 8505_CR27
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.6787
– volume: 361
  start-page: 849
  year: 2009
  ident: 8505_CR7
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901249
– volume: 53
  start-page: 179
  year: 2012
  ident: 8505_CR25
  publication-title: Acta Radiol
  doi: 10.1258/ar.2011.110359
– volume: 286
  start-page: 71
  year: 2018
  ident: 8505_CR4
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162779
– volume: 189
  start-page: 312
  year: 2017
  ident: 8505_CR15
  publication-title: Rofo
  doi: 10.1055/s-0042-121609
– volume: 75
  start-page: e51
  year: 2010
  ident: 8505_CR29
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.012
– volume: 11
  start-page: 271
  year: 2014
  ident: 8505_CR9
  publication-title: J Am Coll Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.016
– volume: 84
  start-page: 2155
  year: 2015
  ident: 8505_CR14
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.06.031
– volume: 192
  start-page: 1045
  year: 2009
  ident: 8505_CR28
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1025
– volume: 256
  start-page: 32
  year: 2010
  ident: 8505_CR1
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.10090908
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1071
  year: 2017
  ident: 8505_CR6
  publication-title: Neuroradiology
  doi: 10.1007/s00234-017-1901-4
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1677
  year: 2014
  ident: 8505_CR20
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3184-z
– volume: 11
  start-page: 8
  year: 2008
  ident: 8505_CR2
  publication-title: Imaging Decisions MRI
  doi: 10.1111/j.1617-0830.2007.00109.x
– volume: 35
  start-page: 1706
  year: 2015
  ident: 8505_CR10
  publication-title: Radiographics
  doi: 10.1148/rg.2015150118
– volume: 184
  start-page: 31
  year: 2005
  ident: 8505_CR24
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840031
– ident: 8505_CR22
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081486
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1173
  year: 2016
  ident: 8505_CR31
  publication-title: Diagn Interv Imaging
  doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.06.005
– volume: 21
  start-page: 48
  year: 2018
  ident: 8505_CR35
  publication-title: Hell J Nucl Med
– volume: 12
  start-page: 39
  year: 2013
  ident: 8505_CR37
  publication-title: Int J Equity Health
  doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-39
– volume: 205
  start-page: 1332
  year: 2015
  ident: 8505_CR13
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13957
– volume: 73
  start-page: e211
  issue: 217
  year: 2018
  ident: 8505_CR5
  publication-title: Clin Radiol
– volume: 56
  start-page: 797
  year: 2014
  ident: 8505_CR21
  publication-title: Neuroradiology
  doi: 10.1007/s00234-014-1393-4
– volume: 80
  start-page: 36
  year: 2011
  ident: 8505_CR12
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.12.099
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1068
  year: 2016
  ident: 8505_CR18
  publication-title: Eur J Radiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.03.022
– ident: 8505_CR38
– volume: 8
  start-page: 64417
  year: 2017
  ident: 8505_CR36
  publication-title: Oncotarget
  doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16295
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2134
  year: 2018
  ident: 8505_CR8
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5150-z
– volume: 29
  start-page: 6109
  year: 2019
  ident: 8505_CR34
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06196-7
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1955
  year: 2017
  ident: 8505_CR3
  publication-title: Radiographics
  doi: 10.1148/rg.2017170100
– volume: 7
  start-page: 439
  year: 2017
  ident: 8505_CR16
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther
  doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.06.07
SSID ssj0009147
Score 2.4003065
Snippet Background and objective Decreasing X-ray tube voltage is an effective way to reduce radiation and contrast dose, especially in non-obese patients. The current...
Decreasing X-ray tube voltage is an effective way to reduce radiation and contrast dose, especially in non-obese patients. The current study focuses on CTA in...
Background and objectiveDecreasing X-ray tube voltage is an effective way to reduce radiation and contrast dose, especially in non-obese patients. The current...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 3808
SubjectTerms Angiography
Clinical medicine
Computed Tomography
Computed Tomography Angiography - methods
Contrast Media
Coronary Angiography - methods
Diagnostic Radiology
Diagnostic systems
Electric potential
Humans
Image acquisition
Image contrast
Image quality
Imaging
Internal Medicine
Interventional Radiology
Iodine
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neuroradiology
Noise
Noise standards
Observational studies
Patients
Prospective Studies
Quality assessment
Radiation
Radiation Dosage
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiology
Segments
Signal quality
Signal to noise ratio
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasound
Visual signals
Voltage
X ray tubes
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM)
  dbid: U2A
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3NjtMwEB5BkVZcVsACm92CjMRtsZQ_O8mxqqgqJDi1qLfIsZ1VoSSrNr3vQ_AEPBpPwozrpEIFJK7x2IkytmfG881ngLc1Lr7ISMNtUksMUIqcq9hoXiVSq0yklakdQPaTnC_TDyux8kVhux7t3qck3U49FLvRtWMhJ0gB0awJLh7CI4GxOwG5lvHkSLUbpZkvj_lzv99N0IlfeZITdaZm9gTOvY_IJgelPoUHtnkGZx99FvwCfngyzw07oDH8hsXamjnkudp1jHLm-29s3XxxWKuGESFDi1rfMXRTWR7yr59RettSOS5TjWEardYarRntHTj0dIFPb9ee0frn_XdFQ_SFmcwBEQnZabesrYajXezoCGufw3L2fjGdc3_XAtdJJjpeYFxjUxmj2oSKtSLaOrpqKheVMZmNsMEKNGmVUqHNDWoy1FUS56HJ60iHdfICRk3b2EtgaVSJIhc2riVlVZNCG53WRorMKnQuZQBR__tL7YnI6T6MTTlQKDuVlaiy0qmsFAHcDH3uDjQc_5Qe91ot_ZLcleiJZOjvyKwI4M3QjIuJMiSqse2eZGLim8PhAnh5mA3D6xLiHsT4NIB3_fQ4Dv73b7n6P_FreBxTgYU75xnDqNvu7St0e7rqtZvlvwCUwf2v
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Clinical effectiveness of contrast medium injection protocols for 80-kV coronary and craniocervical CT angiography—a prospective multicenter observational study
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00330-021-08505-5
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35103828
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2667082679
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2624653330
Volume 32
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELaglRCXivIMlMpI3MAiLz9yqnar3VYgVgh10XKKHNupFkrS7uPOj-gv4KfxS5jxOllVFb3EUvyIlRl7xp6Zbwh5W8PiS6ywzGW1gANKoZhOrWFVJoyWPK9s7R1kJ-J0mn-c8Vm4cFsGt8puT_QbtW0N3pF_AEEiQVwJWRxdXjHMGoXW1ZBC4z7ZRegy5Go5k1vQ3cQnGINDu2KyKPIQNOND5zCJWczQQQFB2zjjNwXTLW3zlqXUC6DxI7IXNEc62JB6n9xzzWPy4HOwjT8hfwLE5wXd-GiEbYy2NfX-6Hq5omhJX_-i8-aH98BqKMI0tMALSwrKK1Ux-_kNWi9aDNKlurHUgCybg4zDHQWGPj6Dt-fzgHP99_e1xiG6cE3q3RPR39MtaFv1F77Q0cPYPiXT8ejs-JSFDAzMZJKvWAGnHZeLFIjJdWo0gtlhAirFK2ulS6DCcRB0ldaxUxboG5sqS1VsVZ2YuM6ekZ2mbdwLQvOk4oXiLq0F2lqzwliT11Zw6TSonCIiSff7SxPgyTFLxkXZAyt7kpVAstKTrOQRedf3udyAc9zZ-qCjahkW6rLcslVE3vTVsMTQbqIb166xTYoodDBcRJ5vuKH_XIaIhHBqjcj7jj22g_9_Li_vnssr8jDFMAt_23NAdlaLtXsNys-qOvQcDk81Pjkku4PxcDjB8uT7pxGUw9Hky1eonaaDf7OgCW0
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NbtQwEB6VIgEXxD-BAkaCE1hNnNhJDgihwrKlP6ct6i04toO2LUnZHyFuPARPwAPwUDwJM87PClX01mtiT6zMeGbsmfkG4FmFmy-yynIXVwoPKHnGtbCGl7EyOpVJaSufILuvxgfJh0N5uAa_-1oYSqvsdaJX1LYxdEe-iYYkRXOl0vz16VdOXaMoutq30GjFYsd9_4ZHtvmr7bfI3-dCjN5Ntsa86yrATZzKBc_Rg3eJErhAqYXRBNBGTZUyWVqbughfOInKu9Q6dJnFNYemjEUW2qyKTFjFSPcSXE5itORUmT56vwL5jXxDszBHJZLmedIV6fhSPWqaFnJKiCCQOMnlv4bwjHd7JjLrDd7oBlzvPFX2phWtm7Dm6ltwZa-Lxd-GXx2k6Alrc0I6tcmaivn8dz1fMIrcL7-waX3kM75qRrAQDcrenKGzzLKQH3_E0bOGioKZri0zaDunaFNJgyHprQk-_TztcLX__PipiURfHsp8OiTll7oZa8rhghknetjcO3BwIby5C-t1U7v7wJKolHkmnagUxXbj3FiTVFbJ1Gl0cVUAUf_7C9PBoVNXjpNiAHL2LCuQZYVnWSEDeDHMOW3BQM4dvdFztegUw7xYiXEAT4fXuKUpTqNr1yxpjCDUOyQXwL1WGobPxYSAiKfkAF724rEi_v-1PDh_LU_g6niyt1vsbu_vPIRrgko8_E3TBqwvZkv3CB2vRfnYSzuDTxe9vf4CBNFAKA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NbtQwEB6VrVRxQZTfQAtGghNYzZ_zc0AVtF21FFYValFvwbEdtFCSsj9C3PoQPAGPwePwJMw4TlZV1d56TeyJlRnPjD0z3wA8r3DzBTrR3ERVggeUPOMy1IqXUaJkKuJSVzZBdpTsHsXvjsXxEvztamEorbLTiVZR60bRHfkGGpIUzVWS5huVS4s42B5unv7g1EGKIq1dO41WRPbNr594fJu-3ttGXr8Iw-HO4dYudx0GuIpSMeM5evMmTkJcrJChkgTWRg2WMlFqnZoAXxiBiryU0jeZxvX7qozCzNdZFSi_ipDuDVhO6VQ0gOW3O6ODjwvI38C2N_NzVClpnseuZMcW7lELNZ9TegRBxgkuzpvFC77uhTitNX_D23DL-a3sTStoq7Bk6juw8sFF5u_CHwcwesLaDBGnRFlTMZsNL6czRnH8-Xc2rr_a_K-aEUhEg5I4Zeg6s8zn3z7h6ElDJcJM1poptKRjtLCkz5D01iE-_TJ2KNv_zn5LItEVizKbHEnZpmbCmrK_bsaJFkT3HhxdC3fuw6BuavMQWByUIs-ECauEIr1RrrSKK52I1Eh0eBMPgu73F8qBo1OPjpOih3W2LCuQZYVlWSE8eNnPOW2hQa4cvdZxtXBqYloshNqDZ_1r3OAUtZG1aeY0JiQMPCTnwYNWGvrPRYSHiGdmD1514rEgfvlaHl29lqewglureL832n8MN0Oq97DXTmswmE3mZh29sFn5xIk7g8_XvcP-A0BARbo
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+effectiveness+of+contrast+medium+injection+protocols+for+80-kV+coronary+and+craniocervical+CT+angiography-a+prospective+multicenter+observational+study&rft.jtitle=European+radiology&rft.au=Wang%2C+Yining&rft.au=Chen%2C+Yu&rft.au=Liu%2C+Peijun&rft.au=Lv%2C+Wan&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=3808&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00330-021-08505-5&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F35103828&rft.externalDocID=35103828
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1432-1084&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1432-1084&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1432-1084&client=summon