Revealing static and dynamic biomarkers from postprandial metabolomics data through coupled matrix and tensor factorizations
Introduction Longitudinal metabolomics data from a meal challenge test contains both fasting and dynamic signals, that may be related to metabolic health and diseases. Recent work has explored the multiway structure of time-resolved metabolomics data by arranging it as a three-way array with modes:...
Saved in:
Published in | Metabolomics Vol. 20; no. 4; p. 86 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Springer US
27.07.2024
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Introduction
Longitudinal metabolomics data from a meal challenge test contains both
fasting
and
dynamic
signals, that may be related to metabolic health and diseases. Recent work has explored the multiway structure of time-resolved metabolomics data by arranging it as a three-way array with modes:
subjects
,
metabolites
, and
time
. The analysis of such dynamic data (where the fasting data is subtracted from postprandial states) reveals dynamic markers of various phenotypes, and differences between fasting and dynamic states. However, there is still limited success in terms of extracting static and dynamic biomarkers for the same subject stratifications.
Objectives
Through joint analysis of fasting and dynamic metabolomics data, our goal is to capture static and dynamic biomarkers of a phenotype for the same subject stratifications providing a complete picture, that will be more effective for precision health.
Methods
We jointly analyze fasting and dynamic metabolomics data collected during a meal challenge test from the COPSAC
2000
cohort using coupled matrix and tensor factorizations (CMTF), where the dynamic data (
subjects
by
metabolites
by
time
) is coupled with the fasting data (
subjects
by
metabolites
) in the
subjects
mode.
Results
The proposed data fusion approach extracts shared subject stratifications in terms of BMI (body mass index) from fasting and dynamic signals as well as the static and dynamic metabolic biomarker patterns corresponding to those stratifications. Specifically, we observe a subject stratification showing the positive association with all fasting VLDLs and higher BMI. For the same subject stratification, a subset of dynamic VLDLs (mainly the smaller sizes) correlates negatively with higher BMI. Higher correlations of the subject quantifications with the phenotype of interest are observed using such a data fusion approach compared to individual analyses of the fasting and postprandial state.
Conclusion
The CMTF-based approach provides a complete picture of static and dynamic biomarkers for the same subject stratifications—when markers are present in both fasting and dynamic states. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1573-3890 1573-3882 1573-3890 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11306-024-02128-9 |