International gestational surrogacy in the United States, 2014–2020

To describe characteristics, trends, and outcomes of international gestational surrogacy cycles in the United States (US). Retrospective cohort study. All assisted reproductive technology cycles in the US reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting Systems t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFertility and sterility Vol. 121; no. 4; pp. 622 - 630
Main Authors Herweck, Alexandra, DeSantis, Carol, Shandley, Lisa M., Kawwass, Jennifer F., Hipp, Heather S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.04.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To describe characteristics, trends, and outcomes of international gestational surrogacy cycles in the United States (US). Retrospective cohort study. All assisted reproductive technology cycles in the US reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting Systems that included an embryo transfer to a gestational carrier from 2014 to 2020. International vs. US intended parents. Cycle characteristics, geographic distributions, and obstetrical outcomes. Of 40,177 embryo transfers to a gestational carrier from 2014 to 2020, 32% were for international intended parents. The number and percent of international intended parents’ gestational carrier cycles increased each year from 2014 (n = 2758, 22.0%) to 2019 (n = 4905, 39.8%) with a decrease in 2020 (n = 4713, 31.8%). Compared with cycles for US intended parents, there was a larger decrease in gestational carrier cycles between 2019 and 2020 for international intended parents (3.9% vs. 32.2%). International intended parents were more likely to be male sex (41.3% vs. 19.6%), older than 42 years (33.9% vs. 26.2%) and identify as Asian race (65.6% vs. 16.5%). International intended parents were largely from China (41.7%), followed by France (9.2%) and Spain (8.5%). Gestational carriers for international intended parents were more commonly younger than 30 years (42.8% vs. 29.1%) and identified as Hispanic race (28.6% vs. 11.7%) compared with gestational carriers for US intended parents. Cycles with international intended parents were more likely to use donor eggs (67.1% vs. 43.5%), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (72.8% vs. 55.4%), and preimplantation genetic testing (79.0% vs. 55.8%). Cycles with international and US intended parents had similar obstetrical outcomes, including live birth (adjusted risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00–1.03) and multiple pregnancy (adjusted risk ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.94–1.06) rates. An increasing number of international intended parents are utilizing gestational surrogacy in the US and more frequently using cost-enhancing specialized treatment techniques. This increase is potentially because of restrictive international commercial surrogacy laws and the increased availability of reproductive medical expertise. Given this growing demographic, continued examination of the volume of cross-border reproductive treatment, as well as the legal and ethical considerations, is warranted. Gestación subrogada internacional en los Estados Unidos entre 2014 y 2020. Describir las características, tendencias y resultados de los ciclos de gestación subrogada de extranjeros en los Estados Unidos (EE. UU.) Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo Todos los ciclos de tecnología de reproducción asistida en los Estados Unidos reportados al Sistema de Informes de Resultados de Clínicas de Tecnología de Reproducción Asistida que incluyen una transferencia de embrión a una gestante subrogada desde 2014 hasta 2020 Internacionales vs padres designados a EEUU Características del ciclo, distribuciones geográficas y resultados obstétricos. De 40,177 transferencias de embriones a una gestante subrogada realizadas entre 2014 y 2020, el 32% correspondió a padres designados extranjeros. El número y el porcentaje de ciclos de gestantes subrogadas para padres designados extranjeros aumentaron cada año desde 2014 (n = 2758, 22.0%) hasta 2019 (n = 4905, 39.8%), con una disminución en 2020 (n = 4713, 31.8%). En comparación con los ciclos para padres designados de los Estados Unidos, hubo una disminución más significativa en los ciclos de gestantes subrogadas entre 2019 y 2020 para los padres designados extranjeros (3.9% vs. 32.2%). Los padres designados extranjeros tenían más probabilidades de ser de sexo masculino (41.3% vs. 19.6%), mayores de 42 años (33.9% vs. 26.2%) e identificarse como de raza asiática (65.6% vs. 16.5%). Los padres designados extranjeros eran en su mayoría de China (41.7%), seguidos por Francia (9.2%) y España (8.5%). Las gestantes subrogadas para padres designados extranjeros eran más comúnmente menores de 30 años (42.8% vs. 29.1%) e identificadas como de raza hispana (28.6% vs. 11.7%) en comparación con las gestantes subrogadas para padres designados de los Estados Unidos. Los ciclos con padres designados extranjeros tenían más probabilidades de utilizar óvulos de donante (67.1% vs. 43.5%), inyección intracitoplasmática de espermatozoides (72.8% vs. 55.4%) y pruebas genéticas preimplantatorias (79.0% vs. 55.8%). Los ciclos con padres designados extranjeros y de los Estados Unidos tuvieron resultados obstétricos similares, incluyendo tasas de nacimientos vivos (cociente de riesgos ajustado 1.01, intervalo de confianza del 95% 1.00–1.03) y de embarazos múltiples (cociente de riesgos ajustado 1.00, intervalo de confianza del 95% 0.94–1.06). Un número creciente de padres designados extranjeros están utilizando la gestación subrogada en los Estados Unidos y, con mayor frecuencia, recurren a técnicas de tratamiento especializadas que aumentan los costos. Este incremento se debe posiblemente a leyes restrictivas de gestación subrogada comercial a nivel internacional y a la mayor disponibilidad de experiencia médica en reproducción. Dada esta creciente demografía, se justifica continuar examinando el volumen de tratamientos reproductivos transfronterizos, así como las consideraciones legales y éticas asociadas.
AbstractList To describe characteristics, trends, and outcomes of international gestational surrogacy cycles in the United States (US). Retrospective cohort study. All assisted reproductive technology cycles in the US reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting Systems that included an embryo transfer to a gestational carrier from 2014 to 2020. International vs. US intended parents. Cycle characteristics, geographic distributions, and obstetrical outcomes. Of 40,177 embryo transfers to a gestational carrier from 2014 to 2020, 32% were for international intended parents. The number and percent of international intended parents' gestational carrier cycles increased each year from 2014 (n = 2758, 22.0%) to 2019 (n = 4905, 39.8%) with a decrease in 2020 (n = 4713, 31.8%). Compared with cycles for US intended parents, there was a larger decrease in gestational carrier cycles between 2019 and 2020 for international intended parents (3.9% vs. 32.2%). International intended parents were more likely to be male sex (41.3% vs. 19.6%), older than 42 years (33.9% vs. 26.2%) and identify as Asian race (65.6% vs. 16.5%). International intended parents were largely from China (41.7%), followed by France (9.2%) and Spain (8.5%). Gestational carriers for international intended parents were more commonly younger than 30 years (42.8% vs. 29.1%) and identified as Hispanic race (28.6% vs. 11.7%) compared with gestational carriers for US intended parents. Cycles with international intended parents were more likely to use donor eggs (67.1% vs. 43.5%), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (72.8% vs. 55.4%), and preimplantation genetic testing (79.0% vs. 55.8%). Cycles with international and US intended parents had similar obstetrical outcomes, including live birth (adjusted risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.03) and multiple pregnancy (adjusted risk ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.06) rates. An increasing number of international intended parents are utilizing gestational surrogacy in the US and more frequently using cost-enhancing specialized treatment techniques. This increase is potentially because of restrictive international commercial surrogacy laws and the increased availability of reproductive medical expertise. Given this growing demographic, continued examination of the volume of cross-border reproductive treatment, as well as the legal and ethical considerations, is warranted.
To describe characteristics, trends, and outcomes of international gestational surrogacy cycles in the United States (US). Retrospective cohort study. All assisted reproductive technology cycles in the US reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting Systems that included an embryo transfer to a gestational carrier from 2014 to 2020. International vs. US intended parents. Cycle characteristics, geographic distributions, and obstetrical outcomes. Of 40,177 embryo transfers to a gestational carrier from 2014 to 2020, 32% were for international intended parents. The number and percent of international intended parents’ gestational carrier cycles increased each year from 2014 (n = 2758, 22.0%) to 2019 (n = 4905, 39.8%) with a decrease in 2020 (n = 4713, 31.8%). Compared with cycles for US intended parents, there was a larger decrease in gestational carrier cycles between 2019 and 2020 for international intended parents (3.9% vs. 32.2%). International intended parents were more likely to be male sex (41.3% vs. 19.6%), older than 42 years (33.9% vs. 26.2%) and identify as Asian race (65.6% vs. 16.5%). International intended parents were largely from China (41.7%), followed by France (9.2%) and Spain (8.5%). Gestational carriers for international intended parents were more commonly younger than 30 years (42.8% vs. 29.1%) and identified as Hispanic race (28.6% vs. 11.7%) compared with gestational carriers for US intended parents. Cycles with international intended parents were more likely to use donor eggs (67.1% vs. 43.5%), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (72.8% vs. 55.4%), and preimplantation genetic testing (79.0% vs. 55.8%). Cycles with international and US intended parents had similar obstetrical outcomes, including live birth (adjusted risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00–1.03) and multiple pregnancy (adjusted risk ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.94–1.06) rates. An increasing number of international intended parents are utilizing gestational surrogacy in the US and more frequently using cost-enhancing specialized treatment techniques. This increase is potentially because of restrictive international commercial surrogacy laws and the increased availability of reproductive medical expertise. Given this growing demographic, continued examination of the volume of cross-border reproductive treatment, as well as the legal and ethical considerations, is warranted. Gestación subrogada internacional en los Estados Unidos entre 2014 y 2020. Describir las características, tendencias y resultados de los ciclos de gestación subrogada de extranjeros en los Estados Unidos (EE. UU.) Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo Todos los ciclos de tecnología de reproducción asistida en los Estados Unidos reportados al Sistema de Informes de Resultados de Clínicas de Tecnología de Reproducción Asistida que incluyen una transferencia de embrión a una gestante subrogada desde 2014 hasta 2020 Internacionales vs padres designados a EEUU Características del ciclo, distribuciones geográficas y resultados obstétricos. De 40,177 transferencias de embriones a una gestante subrogada realizadas entre 2014 y 2020, el 32% correspondió a padres designados extranjeros. El número y el porcentaje de ciclos de gestantes subrogadas para padres designados extranjeros aumentaron cada año desde 2014 (n = 2758, 22.0%) hasta 2019 (n = 4905, 39.8%), con una disminución en 2020 (n = 4713, 31.8%). En comparación con los ciclos para padres designados de los Estados Unidos, hubo una disminución más significativa en los ciclos de gestantes subrogadas entre 2019 y 2020 para los padres designados extranjeros (3.9% vs. 32.2%). Los padres designados extranjeros tenían más probabilidades de ser de sexo masculino (41.3% vs. 19.6%), mayores de 42 años (33.9% vs. 26.2%) e identificarse como de raza asiática (65.6% vs. 16.5%). Los padres designados extranjeros eran en su mayoría de China (41.7%), seguidos por Francia (9.2%) y España (8.5%). Las gestantes subrogadas para padres designados extranjeros eran más comúnmente menores de 30 años (42.8% vs. 29.1%) e identificadas como de raza hispana (28.6% vs. 11.7%) en comparación con las gestantes subrogadas para padres designados de los Estados Unidos. Los ciclos con padres designados extranjeros tenían más probabilidades de utilizar óvulos de donante (67.1% vs. 43.5%), inyección intracitoplasmática de espermatozoides (72.8% vs. 55.4%) y pruebas genéticas preimplantatorias (79.0% vs. 55.8%). Los ciclos con padres designados extranjeros y de los Estados Unidos tuvieron resultados obstétricos similares, incluyendo tasas de nacimientos vivos (cociente de riesgos ajustado 1.01, intervalo de confianza del 95% 1.00–1.03) y de embarazos múltiples (cociente de riesgos ajustado 1.00, intervalo de confianza del 95% 0.94–1.06). Un número creciente de padres designados extranjeros están utilizando la gestación subrogada en los Estados Unidos y, con mayor frecuencia, recurren a técnicas de tratamiento especializadas que aumentan los costos. Este incremento se debe posiblemente a leyes restrictivas de gestación subrogada comercial a nivel internacional y a la mayor disponibilidad de experiencia médica en reproducción. Dada esta creciente demografía, se justifica continuar examinando el volumen de tratamientos reproductivos transfronterizos, así como las consideraciones legales y éticas asociadas.
OBJECTIVETo describe characteristics, trends, and outcomes of international gestational surrogacy cycles in the United States (US).DESIGNRetrospective cohort study.SETTINGAll assisted reproductive technology cycles in the US reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting Systems that included an embryo transfer to a gestational carrier from 2014 to 2020.PATIENTSInternational vs. US intended parents.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESCycle characteristics, geographic distributions, and obstetrical outcomes.RESULTSOf 40,177 embryo transfers to a gestational carrier from 2014 to 2020, 32% were for international intended parents. The number and percent of international intended parents' gestational carrier cycles increased each year from 2014 (n = 2758, 22.0%) to 2019 (n = 4905, 39.8%) with a decrease in 2020 (n = 4713, 31.8%). Compared with cycles for US intended parents, there was a larger decrease in gestational carrier cycles between 2019 and 2020 for international intended parents (3.9% vs. 32.2%). International intended parents were more likely to be male sex (41.3% vs. 19.6%), older than 42 years (33.9% vs. 26.2%) and identify as Asian race (65.6% vs. 16.5%). International intended parents were largely from China (41.7%), followed by France (9.2%) and Spain (8.5%). Gestational carriers for international intended parents were more commonly younger than 30 years (42.8% vs. 29.1%) and identified as Hispanic race (28.6% vs. 11.7%) compared with gestational carriers for US intended parents. Cycles with international intended parents were more likely to use donor eggs (67.1% vs. 43.5%), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (72.8% vs. 55.4%), and preimplantation genetic testing (79.0% vs. 55.8%). Cycles with international and US intended parents had similar obstetrical outcomes, including live birth (adjusted risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.03) and multiple pregnancy (adjusted risk ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.06) rates.CONCLUSIONAn increasing number of international intended parents are utilizing gestational surrogacy in the US and more frequently using cost-enhancing specialized treatment techniques. This increase is potentially because of restrictive international commercial surrogacy laws and the increased availability of reproductive medical expertise. Given this growing demographic, continued examination of the volume of cross-border reproductive treatment, as well as the legal and ethical considerations, is warranted.
Author Shandley, Lisa M.
Kawwass, Jennifer F.
Herweck, Alexandra
DeSantis, Carol
Hipp, Heather S.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Alexandra
  orcidid: 0000-0002-6552-0993
  surname: Herweck
  fullname: Herweck, Alexandra
  email: aherwec@emory.edu
  organization: Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Carol
  surname: DeSantis
  fullname: DeSantis, Carol
  organization: Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Lisa M.
  surname: Shandley
  fullname: Shandley, Lisa M.
  organization: Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory Reproductive Center, Atlanta, Georgia
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jennifer F.
  surname: Kawwass
  fullname: Kawwass, Jennifer F.
  organization: Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory Reproductive Center, Atlanta, Georgia
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Heather S.
  surname: Hipp
  fullname: Hipp, Heather S.
  organization: Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory Reproductive Center, Atlanta, Georgia
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38176517$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkEtOwzAQhi1URMvjCihLFiSMHdtJloDKQ6rEAlhbjj0BV60DdorUHXfghpwEo1JYshnP4pv5x98-GfneIyEZhYIClWfzosMw-DikWjBgZUFZAWWzQyZUCJkLKcoRmQBQkQOr2ZjsxzgHAEkrtkfGZU0rKWg1IdNbn5Z4Pbje60X2hHHY9nEVQv-kzTpzPhueMXv0bkCb3ScC42nGgPLP948UD4dkt9OLiEc_7wF5vJo-XN7ks7vr28vzWW7Kig95WWnJGtkB6M5CzS3Ylje0LYUxnHYcO2oYr0WDlkltai3aRkguESQTnNvygJxs9r6E_nWVblVLFw0uFtpjv4qKNaxumBSSJbTeoCb0MQbs1EtwSx3WioL6lqjm6k-i-paoKFNJYho9_klZtUu0v4Nbawm42ACY_vrmMKhoHHqD1gU0g7K9-z_lC6gziZw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2024_07_008
Cites_doi 10.1080/09649069.2012.750478
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.008
10.1037/dev0000372
10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.003
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.042
10.1177/00258172211060192
10.1001/jama.2022.1892
10.2147/RMHP.S63862
10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.03.010
10.1093/humrep/den184
10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.019
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.046
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346
10.1177/0020872820940008
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.032
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.1168
10.3390/medicina57010047
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.050
10.1080/14647273.2018.1540801
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.012
10.1097/AOG.0000000000004712
10.1097/AOG.0000000000003698
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.007
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2024 American Society for Reproductive Medicine
Copyright © 2024 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2024 American Society for Reproductive Medicine
– notice: Copyright © 2024 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039
DatabaseName PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1556-5653
EndPage 630
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_039
38176517
S0015028223021428
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Institutes of Health
  funderid: https://doi.org/10.13039/100000002
GroupedDBID ---
--K
-~X
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
0R~
1B1
1P~
1~5
29H
34R
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
85S
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIAV
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQXK
AAXUO
ABCQX
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ACGFO
ACIUM
ADBBV
ADMUD
ADPAM
AEFWE
AENEX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGZHU
AI.
AITUG
AJUYK
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALXNB
AMRAJ
AQVPL
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BELOY
C5W
CS3
DU5
EBS
EFJIC
EJD
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
J5H
K-O
KOM
L7B
M41
MO0
N9A
NQ-
O9-
OK1
OQ.
P2P
PH~
R2-
RIG
ROL
RPZ
SDP
SEL
SES
SEW
SSZ
UNMZH
UV1
VH1
W2D
X7M
XH2
XJT
XPP
YOC
YZZ
Z5R
ZA5
ZGI
ZXP
~S-
AFCTW
AFJKZ
NPM
AAYXX
ACRPL
ADNMO
ADVLN
CITATION
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-37a6296f00afd084d0db491b35cc41f4ef1c24859ed26ac8a5b95646e062544d3
ISSN 0015-0282
IngestDate Fri Dec 06 00:19:29 EST 2024
Fri Dec 06 00:39:26 EST 2024
Sat Nov 02 12:26:25 EDT 2024
Sat Apr 06 16:23:47 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords third party reproduction
preimplantation genetic testing
cross-border reproductive care
Gestational carrier
in vitro fertilization
surrogacy
Language English
License Copyright © 2024 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c374t-37a6296f00afd084d0db491b35cc41f4ef1c24859ed26ac8a5b95646e062544d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-6552-0993
PMID 38176517
PQID 2928926562
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2928926562
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_039
pubmed_primary_38176517
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2023_12_039
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Fertility and sterility
PublicationTitleAlternate Fertil Steril
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Mohapatra (bib2) 2012; 21
Hughes, DeJean (bib9) 2010; 94
Munné, Kaplan, Frattarelli, Child, Nakhuda, Shamma (bib30) 2019; 112
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (bib13) 2022; 117
Department of Health and Social Care (bib22) 2021
Gloria Guzman (bib28) 2022
Piersanti, Consalvo, Signore, Del Rio, Zaami (bib20) 2021; 57
Perkins, Boulet, Jamieson, Kissin (bib3) 2016; 106
(bib16) 2020
Golombok, Ilioi, Blake, Roman, Jadva (bib24) 2017; 53
Jadva, Prosser, Gamble (bib11) 2021; 24
Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (bib32) 2020; 114
Jacobson (bib7) 2020; 11
Pennings, de Wert, Shenfield, Cohen, Tarlatzis, Devroey (bib10) 2008; 23
Blyth (bib8) 2010; 94
Haan (bib29)
(bib19) 2023
Martin (bib12) 2014
Hudson, Culley, Blyth, Norton, Rapport, Pacey (bib14) 2011; 22
(bib23) 2022
Bedrick, Tipping, Nickel, Riley, Jain, Jungheim (bib1) 2022; 139
Swiderski (bib25) 2022
Levine, Boulet, Berry, Jamieson, Alberta-Sherer, Kissin (bib15) 2017; 108
Tsai, Shaia, Woodward, Sun, Muasher (bib33) 2020; 135
Shanyun (bib21) 2022; 90
(bib26) 2019
Hipp, Crawford, Boulet, Toner, Sparks, Kawwass (bib31) 2022; 327
Fronek, Rotabi (bib18) 2020; 63
Crawshaw, Blyth, van den Akker (bib6) 2012; 34
Deonandan (bib5) 2015; 8
Jacobson (bib27) 2018; 7
(bib17) 2017; 107
(bib4) 2013; 99
Golombok (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib24) 2017; 53
Tsai (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib33) 2020; 135
Blyth (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib8) 2010; 94
Levine (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib15) 2017; 108
Hughes (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib9) 2010; 94
Swiderski (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib25) 2022
Haan (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib29)
Jadva (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib11) 2021; 24
Martin (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib12) 2014
(10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib17) 2017; 107
Crawshaw (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib6) 2012; 34
Gloria Guzman (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib28)
Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib32) 2020; 114
Perkins (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib3) 2016; 106
Fronek (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib18) 2020; 63
Piersanti (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib20) 2021; 57
Pennings (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib10) 2008; 23
Jacobson (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib27) 2018; 7
Bedrick (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib1) 2022; 139
Mohapatra (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib2) 2012; 21
Hudson (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib14) 2011; 22
Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib13) 2022; 117
(10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib16) 2020
Department of Health and Social Care (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib22)
(10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib4) 2013; 99
Munné (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib30) 2019; 112
Shanyun (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib21) 2022; 90
Jacobson (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib7) 2020; 11
Deonandan (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib5) 2015; 8
Hipp (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib31) 2022; 327
References_xml – ident: bib29
  article-title: Average salary by age in 2024. Forbes
  contributor:
    fullname: Haan
– volume: 8
  start-page: 111
  year: 2015
  end-page: 119
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Recent trends in reproductive tourism and international surrogacy: ethical considerations and challenges for policy
  publication-title: Risk Manag Healthc Policy
  contributor:
    fullname: Deonandan
– volume: 11
  start-page: 42
  year: 2020
  end-page: 47
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Cross-border reproductive care in the USA: who comes, why do they come, what do they purchase?
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Soc Online
  contributor:
    fullname: Jacobson
– volume: 108
  start-page: 815
  year: 2017
  end-page: 821
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Assessing the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States by non-United States residents
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  contributor:
    fullname: Kissin
– volume: 107
  start-page: e3
  year: 2017
  end-page: e10
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
– volume: 24
  start-page: 93
  year: 2021
  end-page: 104
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Cross-border and domestic surrogacy in the UK context: an exploration of practical and legal decision-making
  publication-title: Hum Fertil (Camb)
  contributor:
    fullname: Gamble
– year: 2021
  ident: bib22
  article-title: The surrogacy pathway: surrogacy and the legal process for intended parents and surrogates in England and Wales
  contributor:
    fullname: Department of Health and Social Care
– volume: 7
  start-page: 14
  year: 2018
  end-page: 23
  ident: bib27
  article-title: A limited market: the recruitment of gay men as surrogacy clients by the infertility industry in the USA
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Soc Online
  contributor:
    fullname: Jacobson
– volume: 106
  start-page: 435
  year: 2016
  ident: bib3
  article-title: National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System (NASS) Group. Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  contributor:
    fullname: Kissin
– year: 2023
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Coronavirus:Timeline
– volume: 135
  start-page: 717
  year: 2020
  end-page: 722
  ident: bib33
  article-title: Surrogacy laws in the United States: what obstetrician-gynecologists need to know
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Muasher
– volume: 139
  start-page: 500
  year: 2022
  end-page: 508
  ident: bib1
  article-title: State-mandated insurance coverage and preimplantation genetic testing in the United States
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  contributor:
    fullname: Jungheim
– volume: 23
  start-page: 2182
  year: 2008
  end-page: 2184
  ident: bib10
  article-title: ESHRE task force on ethics and law 15: cross-border reproductive care
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  contributor:
    fullname: Devroey
– volume: 21
  start-page: 191
  year: 2012
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Achieving reproductive justice in the international surrogacy market
  publication-title: Ann Health L
  contributor:
    fullname: Mohapatra
– volume: 53
  start-page: 1966
  year: 2017
  end-page: 1977
  ident: bib24
  article-title: A longitudinal study of families formed through reproductive donation: parent-adolescent relationships and adolescent adjustment at age 14
  publication-title: Dev Psychol
  contributor:
    fullname: Jadva
– volume: 112
  start-page: 1071
  year: 2019
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  contributor:
    fullname: Shamma
– year: 2014
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Reproductive tourism in the United States: creating family in the mother country
  contributor:
    fullname: Martin
– year: 2019
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Simple Surrogacy, State-by-State Laws on Surrogacy for Gay Parents
– volume: 114
  start-page: 239
  year: 2020
  end-page: 245
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor indications: a committee opinion
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  contributor:
    fullname: Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
– volume: 94
  start-page: e16
  year: 2010
  end-page: e19
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providers
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  contributor:
    fullname: DeJean
– volume: 327
  start-page: 1288
  year: 2022
  end-page: 1290
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Trends and outcomes for preimplantation genetic testing in the United States, 2014-2018
  publication-title: JAMA
  contributor:
    fullname: Kawwass
– volume: 22
  start-page: 673
  year: 2011
  end-page: 685
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Cross-border reproductive care: a review of the literature
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
  contributor:
    fullname: Pacey
– volume: 57
  start-page: 47
  year: 2021
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Surrogacy and "Procreative Tourism". What does the future hold from the ethical and legal perspectives?
  publication-title: Medicina (Kaunas)
  contributor:
    fullname: Zaami
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1838
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1841
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Consideration of the gestational carrier: a committee opinion
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
– volume: 34
  start-page: 267
  year: 2012
  end-page: 277
  ident: bib6
  article-title: The changing profile of surrogacy in the UK – implications for national and international policy and practice
  publication-title: J Soc Welf Fam Law
  contributor:
    fullname: van den Akker
– volume: 63
  start-page: 665
  year: 2020
  end-page: 670
  ident: bib18
  article-title: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intercountry adoption and international commercial surrogacy
  publication-title: Int Soc Work
  contributor:
    fullname: Rotabi
– year: 2022
  ident: bib25
  article-title: LGBT surrogacy laws around the world: international surrogacy for gay intended parents
  contributor:
    fullname: Swiderski
– volume: 90
  start-page: 41
  year: 2022
  end-page: 44
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Uterus rental: regulating surrogacy in China
  publication-title: Med Leg J
  contributor:
    fullname: Shanyun
– year: 2022
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Income in the United States
  contributor:
    fullname: Gloria Guzman
– year: 2020
  ident: bib16
  article-title: 2020 Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Fertility Clinic and National Summary Report
– volume: 117
  start-page: 954
  year: 2022
  end-page: 962
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Cross-border reproductive care: an Ethics Committee opinion
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  contributor:
    fullname: Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
– volume: 94
  start-page: e11
  year: 2010
  end-page: e15
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Fertility patients’ experiences of cross-border reproductive care
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  contributor:
    fullname: Blyth
– year: 2022
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Rules around releasing donor information
– volume: 34
  start-page: 267
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib6
  article-title: The changing profile of surrogacy in the UK – implications for national and international policy and practice
  publication-title: J Soc Welf Fam Law
  doi: 10.1080/09649069.2012.750478
  contributor:
    fullname: Crawshaw
– volume: 94
  start-page: e16
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib9
  article-title: Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providers
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.12.008
  contributor:
    fullname: Hughes
– volume: 53
  start-page: 1966
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib24
  article-title: A longitudinal study of families formed through reproductive donation: parent-adolescent relationships and adolescent adjustment at age 14
  publication-title: Dev Psychol
  doi: 10.1037/dev0000372
  contributor:
    fullname: Golombok
– year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib25
  contributor:
    fullname: Swiderski
– volume: 11
  start-page: 42
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib7
  article-title: Cross-border reproductive care in the USA: who comes, why do they come, what do they purchase?
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Soc Online
  doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.003
  contributor:
    fullname: Jacobson
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1838
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib4
  article-title: Consideration of the gestational carrier: a committee opinion
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.042
– volume: 90
  start-page: 41
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib21
  article-title: Uterus rental: regulating surrogacy in China
  publication-title: Med Leg J
  doi: 10.1177/00258172211060192
  contributor:
    fullname: Shanyun
– volume: 327
  start-page: 1288
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib31
  article-title: Trends and outcomes for preimplantation genetic testing in the United States, 2014-2018
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1892
  contributor:
    fullname: Hipp
– volume: 8
  start-page: 111
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib5
  article-title: Recent trends in reproductive tourism and international surrogacy: ethical considerations and challenges for policy
  publication-title: Risk Manag Healthc Policy
  doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S63862
  contributor:
    fullname: Deonandan
– ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib29
  contributor:
    fullname: Haan
– volume: 22
  start-page: 673
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib14
  article-title: Cross-border reproductive care: a review of the literature
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Online
  doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.03.010
  contributor:
    fullname: Hudson
– ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib22
  contributor:
    fullname: Department of Health and Social Care
– year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib12
  contributor:
    fullname: Martin
– year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib16
– volume: 23
  start-page: 2182
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib10
  article-title: ESHRE task force on ethics and law 15: cross-border reproductive care
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/den184
  contributor:
    fullname: Pennings
– volume: 7
  start-page: 14
  year: 2018
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib27
  article-title: A limited market: the recruitment of gay men as surrogacy clients by the infertility industry in the USA
  publication-title: Reprod Biomed Soc Online
  doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.019
  contributor:
    fullname: Jacobson
– volume: 21
  start-page: 191
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib2
  article-title: Achieving reproductive justice in the international surrogacy market
  publication-title: Ann Health L
  contributor:
    fullname: Mohapatra
– volume: 94
  start-page: e11
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib8
  article-title: Fertility patients’ experiences of cross-border reproductive care
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.01.046
  contributor:
    fullname: Blyth
– volume: 112
  start-page: 1071
  year: 2019
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib30
  article-title: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346
  contributor:
    fullname: Munné
– ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib28
  contributor:
    fullname: Gloria Guzman
– volume: 63
  start-page: 665
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib18
  article-title: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intercountry adoption and international commercial surrogacy
  publication-title: Int Soc Work
  doi: 10.1177/0020872820940008
  contributor:
    fullname: Fronek
– volume: 114
  start-page: 239
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib32
  article-title: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor indications: a committee opinion
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.05.032
  contributor:
    fullname: Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
– volume: 108
  start-page: 815
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib15
  article-title: Assessing the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States by non-United States residents
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.07.1168
  contributor:
    fullname: Levine
– volume: 57
  start-page: 47
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib20
  article-title: Surrogacy and "Procreative Tourism". What does the future hold from the ethical and legal perspectives?
  publication-title: Medicina (Kaunas)
  doi: 10.3390/medicina57010047
  contributor:
    fullname: Piersanti
– volume: 106
  start-page: 435
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib3
  article-title: National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System (NASS) Group. Trends and outcomes of gestational surrogacy in the United States
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.050
  contributor:
    fullname: Perkins
– volume: 24
  start-page: 93
  year: 2021
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib11
  article-title: Cross-border and domestic surrogacy in the UK context: an exploration of practical and legal decision-making
  publication-title: Hum Fertil (Camb)
  doi: 10.1080/14647273.2018.1540801
  contributor:
    fullname: Jadva
– volume: 117
  start-page: 954
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib13
  article-title: Cross-border reproductive care: an Ethics Committee opinion
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.012
  contributor:
    fullname: Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
– volume: 139
  start-page: 500
  year: 2022
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib1
  article-title: State-mandated insurance coverage and preimplantation genetic testing in the United States
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004712
  contributor:
    fullname: Bedrick
– volume: 135
  start-page: 717
  year: 2020
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib33
  article-title: Surrogacy laws in the United States: what obstetrician-gynecologists need to know
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003698
  contributor:
    fullname: Tsai
– volume: 107
  start-page: e3
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039_bib17
  article-title: Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion
  publication-title: Fertil Steril
  doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.007
SSID ssj0006172
Score 2.5037637
Snippet To describe characteristics, trends, and outcomes of international gestational surrogacy cycles in the United States (US). Retrospective cohort study. All...
OBJECTIVETo describe characteristics, trends, and outcomes of international gestational surrogacy cycles in the United States (US).DESIGNRetrospective cohort...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 622
SubjectTerms cross-border reproductive care
Gestational carrier
in vitro fertilization
preimplantation genetic testing
surrogacy
third party reproduction
Title International gestational surrogacy in the United States, 2014–2020
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38176517
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2928926562
Volume 121
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9NAEF6FVEJcUMszvGQkbsWWvbve2Oqp0IYKES5tUW-rtb2L2oOD7ESROHHnyD_sL-mMd-3Y0EoFLpZjKbEzM575ZnbmW0LeQJDLjClS32Q89XnBch_CgvJVXkR8yowOU5x3nn8WR6f841l8Nhr97HUtrZZZkH-_dq7kX7QK10CvOCX7F5rtfhQuwDnoF46gYTjeSsfDch6uFLXn9aqqFl9xK3fXxzjAlihXCMm87XTA3c3DPkydYbd1A9CbujryOeOnTeG0WmvrR92ATNV59wN9DMpyzAWum8SRQDaEDrZCfl6r3XnQeXu1Xqu67nfb7M6CfkGC9vtYmipZOykzaOREbOZjfmfjjnO2sfABULKBN7YD087seM-3Ckp7YVrY5Zw_IoAtRlwE8KTIwQvHAHeIb2q-ljbpN37t44ZlEbtpmeWfu0O2kFWRj8nWh3efvux3gR3Bng3s9q-4xjDbLnj9_W5COzdlMw2qOdkm91064u1b29ohI10-IHfnruHiITkcmJjXMzGvMzHvvPTAxDxrYp41sbceGtjlj19oWo_I6ezw5P2R73be8HM25UuIOkrQVJgwVKYIE16EBbzKUcbiPOeR4dpEOXLhpbqgQuWJijPIs7nQoUDKu4I9JuNyUeqnxNPThDHIucOMGi7CIgFwYDLNFeQNArDqhESthOQ3S7Ai287DC7mRqkSpyohKkOqE7LWilA4oWgAowQpu8e3XrfQl-FJcIFOlXqxqSVOapBQyHDohT6xaumdCJksRR9Nn_3Xv5-Te5pV5QcbLaqVfAqpdZq-ctV0BoOmhRA
link.rule.ids 314,780,784,27924,27925
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=International+gestational+surrogacy+in+the+United+States%2C+2014%E2%80%932020&rft.jtitle=Fertility+and+sterility&rft.au=Herweck%2C+Alexandra&rft.au=DeSantis%2C+Carol&rft.au=Shandley%2C+Lisa+M.&rft.au=Kawwass%2C+Jennifer+F.&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=0015-0282&rft.eissn=1556-5653&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=622&rft.epage=630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.fertnstert.2023.12.039&rft.externalDocID=S0015028223021428
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0015-0282&client=summon