Assessing the ecological and economic sustainability of energy crops
The production and use of biomass for energy has both positive and negative impacts on the environment. The environmental impacts of energy crops should be clarified before political choices concerning energy crops are made. An important aid to policy-making would be a systematic methodology to asse...
Saved in:
Published in | Biomass & bioenergy Vol. 15; no. 4; pp. 345 - 355 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
11.10.1998
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The production and use of biomass for energy has both positive and negative impacts on the environment. The environmental impacts of energy crops should be clarified before political choices concerning energy crops are made. An important aid to policy-making would be a systematic methodology to assess the environmental sustainability of energy crops. So far, most studies on the environmental aspects of energy crops deal mainly with the energy production of the crops and the possible consequences for CO
2 mitigation. The Dutch Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM) has developed a systematic methodology to assess the ecological and socio-economic sustainability of biomass crops. The method is best described as a multicriteria analysis of process chains and is very much related to Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Characteristics of our methodology are the use of:
•
definition of functional units;
•
analysis of the entire lifecycle;
•
definition of yield levels and corresponding agricultural practices;
•
analysis of both ecological and economic criteria;
•
definition of reference systems;
•
definition of procedures for normalisation and weighting.
CLM has applied the method to assess the sustainability of ten potentially interesting energy crops in four European regions. The results are used to outline the perspectives for large scale production of biomass crops with regard to the medium and long term land availability in Europe. For the crops considered, net energy budget ranges from 85 GJ net avoided fossil energy per ha for rape seed for fuel to 248 GJ net avoided fossil energy per ha for silage maize for electricity from gasification. The methodology of the tool and its results were discussed at the concerted action “Environmental aspects of biomass production and routes for European energy supply” (AIR3-94-2455), organised by CLM in 1996. Major conclusions of the research:
•
Multicriteria analysis of process lifecycles is at present the best available option to assess the ecological and economical sustainability of energy crops. However, it is recognised that further research and development activities in the field of LCA are necessary.
•
Use of crops for generation of electricity is preferred to use of crops for transport fuels since the latter score low on both ecological and socio-economical criteria.
•
Large scale use and production of energy crops requires (a) choices and goals from agricultural, environmental, and energy policies, and (b) policy instruments for financial incentives e.g. with payments or with tax rebates, preferably per kilogram avoided CO
2 emission. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The production and use of biomass for energy has both positive and negative impacts on the environment. The environmental impacts of energy crops should be clarified before political choices concerning energy crops are made. An important aid to policy-making would be a systematic methodology to assess the environmental sustainability of energy crops. So far, most studies on the environmental aspects of energy crops deal mainly with the energy production of the crops and the possible consequences for CO
2 mitigation. The Dutch Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM) has developed a systematic methodology to assess the ecological and socio-economic sustainability of biomass crops. The method is best described as a multicriteria analysis of process chains and is very much related to Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Characteristics of our methodology are the use of:
•
definition of functional units;
•
analysis of the entire lifecycle;
•
definition of yield levels and corresponding agricultural practices;
•
analysis of both ecological and economic criteria;
•
definition of reference systems;
•
definition of procedures for normalisation and weighting.
CLM has applied the method to assess the sustainability of ten potentially interesting energy crops in four European regions. The results are used to outline the perspectives for large scale production of biomass crops with regard to the medium and long term land availability in Europe. For the crops considered, net energy budget ranges from 85 GJ net avoided fossil energy per ha for rape seed for fuel to 248 GJ net avoided fossil energy per ha for silage maize for electricity from gasification. The methodology of the tool and its results were discussed at the concerted action “Environmental aspects of biomass production and routes for European energy supply” (AIR3-94-2455), organised by CLM in 1996. Major conclusions of the research:
•
Multicriteria analysis of process lifecycles is at present the best available option to assess the ecological and economical sustainability of energy crops. However, it is recognised that further research and development activities in the field of LCA are necessary.
•
Use of crops for generation of electricity is preferred to use of crops for transport fuels since the latter score low on both ecological and socio-economical criteria.
•
Large scale use and production of energy crops requires (a) choices and goals from agricultural, environmental, and energy policies, and (b) policy instruments for financial incentives e.g. with payments or with tax rebates, preferably per kilogram avoided CO
2 emission. |
Author | Biewinga, Edo E Hanegraaf, Marjoleine C van derBijl, Gert |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Marjoleine C surname: Hanegraaf fullname: Hanegraaf, Marjoleine C organization: Centre for Agriculture and Environment, P.O. Box 10015, 3505 AA Utrecht, The Netherlands – sequence: 2 givenname: Edo E surname: Biewinga fullname: Biewinga, Edo E organization: Centre for Agriculture and Environment, P.O. Box 10015, 3505 AA Utrecht, The Netherlands – sequence: 3 givenname: Gert surname: van derBijl fullname: van derBijl, Gert organization: Centre for Agriculture and Environment, P.O. Box 10015, 3505 AA Utrecht, The Netherlands |
BookMark | eNqFkEtLAzEUhYNUsK3-BGGWuhhNZjKTBBdS6hMKLtR1yOOmRqaZkkSh_95pKy7cdHXvhfOdyzkTNAp9AITOCb4imLTXr1i0pBRNTS8Ev8QY06pkR2hMOKvLSmAxQuM_yQmapPSJMaGYkjG6m6UEKfmwLPIHFGD6rl96o7pCBbs9Q7_ypkhfKSsflPadz5uidwUEiMtNYWK_Tqfo2KkuwdnvnKL3h_u3-VO5eHl8ns8WpalZnUvTUseUqiloxyljpHJaMS60rbVywCtLcKM1sU5zRXTDLadWMLANHjbd1lN0s_cdvqYUwUnjs8q-Dzkq30mC5bYQuStEbtNKweWuEMkGuvlHr6Nfqbg5yN3uORiifXuIMhkPwYD1EUyWtvcHHH4AuSF8LA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_ep_10047 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enpol_2008_10_032 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2006_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2009_11_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2011_06_031 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2015_06_048 crossref_primary_10_7745_KJSSF_2011_44_6_1195 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_022_23613_5 crossref_primary_10_1021_jf3000828 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2011_10_003 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1742170507002037 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2486_2008_01704_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2012_07_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2015_12_123 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2012_06_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1757_1707_2010_01073_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s12155_012_9207_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2010_01_001 crossref_primary_10_4081_ija_2009_s1_125 crossref_primary_10_1080_20426445_2020_1816766 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2016_11_029 crossref_primary_10_4141_cjss2013_058 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2020_123792 crossref_primary_10_1080_02508060_2014_959870 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_012_0493_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cnsns_2007_08_011 crossref_primary_10_3390_w13151994 crossref_primary_10_1080_07352689_2016_1257842 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2015_01_025 crossref_primary_10_3390_en14051415 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eja_2004_05_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_cli7120142 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvman_2009_01_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enpol_2004_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1080_07352680500316334 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10806_014_9510_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10098_014_0867_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2007_08_004 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10098_013_0675_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2014_04_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_indcrop_2014_08_011 crossref_primary_10_4236_nr_2014_57030 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecoleng_2015_04_068 crossref_primary_10_3390_app9245425 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2009_10_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0961_9534_01_00002_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10230_014_0304_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2014_05_054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2015_04_142 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0961_9534_02_00190_3 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1757_1707_2011_01130_x crossref_primary_10_1002_bbb_65 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_indcrop_2021_113999 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jclepro_2017_06_109 crossref_primary_10_5937_jaes0_30277 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_enpol_2005_02_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiotec_2012_07_190 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2005_03_022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2012_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2011_01_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_renene_2019_11_080 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy9020098 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_landusepol_2018_03_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2022_112154 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11027_007_9122_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2008_04_020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2015_12_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2011_08_016 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10668_023_04248_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2020_105903 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1757_1707_2012_01198_x crossref_primary_10_1300_J237v07n01_11 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2006_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2007_01_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2013_08_092 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10460_004_7230_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11027_010_9215_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biombioe_2011_11_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2016_09_096 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11367_010_0170_9 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION |
DOI | 10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00042-7 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering Ecology Environmental Sciences |
EISSN | 1873-2909 |
EndPage | 355 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1016_S0961_9534_98_00042_7 S0961953498000427 |
GroupedDBID | --K --M .~1 0R~ 1B1 1~. 1~5 23N 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ 9JM 9JN AABNK AABVA AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAHCO AAIAV AAIKJ AAKOC AALCJ AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQXK AARJD AATLK AAXUO ABFNM ABGRD ABJNI ABMAC ABXDB ABYKQ ACDAQ ACGFS ACRLP ADBBV ADEZE ADMUD ADQTV AEBSH AEKER AENEX AEQOU AFKWA AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGUBO AGYEJ AHEUO AHHHB AHIDL AHPOS AI. AIEXJ AIKHN AITUG AJBFU AJOXV AKIFW AKURH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMFUW AMRAJ ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BELTK BKOJK BLECG BLXMC CBWCG CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-2 G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W JARJE KOM LY6 M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- RIG ROL RPZ SAC SCC SDF SDG SES SEW SPC SPCBC SSA SSG SSJ SSR SSZ T5K VH1 WUQ ~G- ~KM AAHBH AATTM AAXKI AAYWO AAYXX ABWVN ACRPL ACVFH ADCNI ADNMO AEIPS AEUPX AFPUW AGCQF AGQPQ AGRNS AIIUN AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ANKPU CITATION SSH |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-c64f7aa34ebf847712fba789bd3bafe82d105bb1dfb8a1b58d84d97ed50d84b63 |
IEDL.DBID | AIKHN |
ISSN | 0961-9534 |
IngestDate | Thu Apr 24 22:55:47 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:49:14 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:20:48 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | greenhouse gases ecology environment chain analysis land-use incentives energy crops Biomass economy LCA sustainability |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c373t-c64f7aa34ebf847712fba789bd3bafe82d105bb1dfb8a1b58d84d97ed50d84b63 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_S0961_9534_98_00042_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0961_9534_98_00042_7 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_S0961_9534_98_00042_7 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 1900 |
PublicationDate | 1998-10-11 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 1998-10-11 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 1998 text: 1998-10-11 day: 11 |
PublicationDecade | 1990 |
PublicationTitle | Biomass & bioenergy |
PublicationYear | 1998 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Ltd |
References | Milieumeetlat voor bestrijdingsmiddelen—Werkboek [Yardstick for pesticides—Working book], Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Utrecht/Information and Knowledge Centre (IKC), Core Group Multi Year Plan for Crop Protection, Ede, 1995 Eurostat, Crop production—Quarterly statistics 1—1990 Grond voor Keuzen Taschner, K. Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, 1993 Gosse, G., Environmental aspects of a grain crop management: the rapeseed example. In Oegema, T. and Posma, G. ed. C. P. Mitchell and A. V. Bridgwater. Proceedings of Seminar in Snekkersten (Denmark), September 1993 CPL Press, Newbury, 1994, pp. 44–53 Kaltschmitt, M. and Reinhardt, G. A. Eurostat, Luxemburg, 1990 Bouwman, A. F. Gebruik van chemische bestrijdingsmiddelen [Use of chemical pesticides], Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), The Hague, 1992 Bilanzierung nachwachsender Rohstoffe. Grundlagen und Fallstudie [Energy and CO Sengers, H. H. W. J. M. and Meeusen-van, Onna M. J. G. Institut für Umweltforschung (Ifeu), Heidelberg/European Commission DG XI, Brussels, 1994 National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), Bilthoven, 1994 Institute for Environmental and System Analysis (IMSA), Amsterdam, 1994 Ökologische Bilanz von Rapsöl und Rapsölmethylester als Ersatz von Dieselkrafstoff (Ökobilanz Rapsöl) [Ecological balance of oilseed rape the methyl ester of oilseed as substitutes for diesel oil (Oilseed Rape Ecobalance)] TEXTE. 4/93. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin. 1993 European Environmental Bureau, Brussels, 1993 Biewinga, E. E. Van and der Bijl, G. van der Bijl, G. and Biewinga, E. E., Environmental impact of biomass for energy. Proceedings of a conference in Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. AIR 3-94-2455. Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Utrecht, 1996 Scharmer, K., Studie zur Energiebilanz, den Umweltauswirkungen und der Wirtschaftlichkeit zur Herstellung von Methylester aus Pflanzenölen in Europa als Alternative zur Verwendung von fossilem Dieselkraftstof [Study of the energy balance, environmental impacts and cost-effectiveness of the production of methyl ester from vegetable oil in Europe as an alternative to the use of fossil diesel oil]. GET, Gesellschaft für Entwichlungstechnologie, 1995 Eden, T. U., Höpfner, H. and Reinhardt, G. A. Eurostat Zeijts, H., Oosterveld, E. B. and Timmerman, E. A. Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1996 Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden/Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Utrecht/Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI-DLO), The Hague, 1996 Spirinckx, C. and Ceuterick, D. Comparative LCA of diesel and biodiesel. In: International Conference on Application of Life Cycle Assessment in Agriculture, Food and Non-Food Agro-Industry and Forestry—Achievements and Prospects. ed. Ceuterick D. Proc. of conference in Brussels (Belgium) Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO) 1996 Nonhebel, S., Harvesting the sun’s energy using agro-ecosystems Agricultural University, Department of Theoretical Production Ecology, Wageningen, 1995 Reinhardt, G., Energie- und CO Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Utrecht, 1996 Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Utrecht, 1994 balance of renewable raw materials–Principles and case study Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR), The Hague, 1992 Conversieroutes voor energiegewassen—Een overzicht van bestaande en mogelijke routes voor de produktie van elektriciteit en transportbrandstoffen [Conversion routes for energy crops—An overview of existing possible routes for the production of electricity transport fuels. Biomass Technology Group (BTG), Enschede, 1994 |
References_xml | – reference: , Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Utrecht, 1994 – reference: Eurostat, – reference: Ökologische Bilanz von Rapsöl und Rapsölmethylester als Ersatz von Dieselkrafstoff (Ökobilanz Rapsöl) [Ecological balance of oilseed rape the methyl ester of oilseed as substitutes for diesel oil (Oilseed Rape Ecobalance)] TEXTE. 4/93. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin. 1993 – reference: Zeijts, H., Oosterveld, E. B. and Timmerman, E. A., – reference: balance of renewable raw materials–Principles and case study], – reference: , ed. C. P. Mitchell and A. V. Bridgwater. Proceedings of Seminar in Snekkersten (Denmark), September 1993 CPL Press, Newbury, 1994, pp. 44–53 – reference: , Vieweg Verlag, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden, 1993 – reference: Gebruik van chemische bestrijdingsmiddelen [Use of chemical pesticides], Netherlands Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), The Hague, 1992 – reference: Eden, T. U., Höpfner, H. and Reinhardt, G. A., – reference: , Institute for Environmental and System Analysis (IMSA), Amsterdam, 1994 – reference: Sengers, H. H. W. J. M. and Meeusen-van, Onna M. J. G., – reference: Grond voor Keuzen, – reference: , Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden/Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Utrecht/Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI-DLO), The Hague, 1996 – reference: Reinhardt, G., Energie- und CO – reference: Taschner, K., – reference: , European Environmental Bureau, Brussels, 1993 – reference: Spirinckx, C. and Ceuterick, D. Comparative LCA of diesel and biodiesel. In: International Conference on Application of Life Cycle Assessment in Agriculture, Food and Non-Food Agro-Industry and Forestry—Achievements and Prospects. ed. Ceuterick D. Proc. of conference in Brussels (Belgium) Flemish Institute for Technological Research (VITO) 1996 – reference: Conversieroutes voor energiegewassen—Een overzicht van bestaande en mogelijke routes voor de produktie van elektriciteit en transportbrandstoffen [Conversion routes for energy crops—An overview of existing possible routes for the production of electricity transport fuels. Biomass Technology Group (BTG), Enschede, 1994 – reference: Kaltschmitt, M. and Reinhardt, G. A., – reference: , Eurostat, Luxemburg, 1990 – reference: -Bilanzierung nachwachsender Rohstoffe. Grundlagen und Fallstudie [Energy and CO – reference: , Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Utrecht, 1996 – reference: Nonhebel, S., Harvesting the sun’s energy using agro-ecosystems Agricultural University, Department of Theoretical Production Ecology, Wageningen, 1995 – reference: Oegema, T. and Posma, G., – reference: van der Bijl, G. and Biewinga, E. E., Environmental impact of biomass for energy. Proceedings of a conference in Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. AIR 3-94-2455. Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Utrecht, 1996 – reference: Biewinga, E. E. Van and der Bijl, G., – reference: , Vieweg Verlag, Wiesbaden, 1996 – reference: , Netherlands Scientific Council for Government Policy (WRR), The Hague, 1992 – reference: Bouwman, A. F., – reference: , Institut für Umweltforschung (Ifeu), Heidelberg/European Commission DG XI, Brussels, 1994 – reference: Milieumeetlat voor bestrijdingsmiddelen—Werkboek [Yardstick for pesticides—Working book], Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Utrecht/Information and Knowledge Centre (IKC), Core Group Multi Year Plan for Crop Protection, Ede, 1995 – reference: , National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), Bilthoven, 1994 – reference: Eurostat, Crop production—Quarterly statistics 1—1990, – reference: Gosse, G., Environmental aspects of a grain crop management: the rapeseed example. In – reference: Scharmer, K., Studie zur Energiebilanz, den Umweltauswirkungen und der Wirtschaftlichkeit zur Herstellung von Methylester aus Pflanzenölen in Europa als Alternative zur Verwendung von fossilem Dieselkraftstof [Study of the energy balance, environmental impacts and cost-effectiveness of the production of methyl ester from vegetable oil in Europe as an alternative to the use of fossil diesel oil]. GET, Gesellschaft für Entwichlungstechnologie, 1995 |
SSID | ssj0014041 |
Score | 1.9245127 |
Snippet | The production and use of biomass for energy has both positive and negative impacts on the environment. The environmental impacts of energy crops should be... |
SourceID | crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 345 |
SubjectTerms | Biomass chain analysis ecology economy energy crops environment greenhouse gases incentives land-use LCA sustainability |
Title | Assessing the ecological and economic sustainability of energy crops |
URI | https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00042-7 |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3PS8MwFH7MDUEPotPh_DFy8KCHbm2TJulxzI2puIsOditJk8JAtuHmYRf_dpO03SaIgodCG_JCeX1978F73_cAblImGRGh8jCX1COCCc9cvpcyEoW-FlQ4io3nER2OyeMkmlSgV2JhbFtl4ftzn-68dbHSKbTZWUynnRc7rCSOMIm57yZG7EEtxDE1pl3rPjwNR5tiAvHdAEu731YryRbIkx_iFm9jfufO8djPIWon7AyO4ajIF1E3f6UTqOhZHfb7jmt6XYfDHT7BOjT6W9iaESr-2-Up3Oe1XbMJmYQP6bR0eUjMlH104GS0LNFUtmF2jeYZ0g4aiOycr-UZjAf9197QK-YneClmeOWllGRMCEy0zEwQYkGYScF4LBWWItM8VCa5kjJQmeQikBFXnKiYaRX55k5S3IDqbD7T54BwRKRUzPKvS6J9bUnyLQY35ZT5NKNNIKXKkrQgF7czLt6SbReZ0XRiNZ3EPHGaTlgT2huxRc6u8ZcAL79H8s1MEhMBfhe9-L_oJRw4KKJtZAmuoLp6_9DXJhdZyRbstT-DVmFxX9vK2CQ |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NS8MwFH_MiagH0elwfubgQQ91_Uib9ChzY-q2ixvsFpImhYF0w83DLv7tJmm7TRAFD4U25IXwmvcBeb_fA7hJiCCY-9IJqIgczAl39OM6CcGh7yoecUux0R9E3RF-HofjCrRKLIwpqyx8f-7TrbcuRpqFNpuzyaT5apqVxGGAY-rajhFbsI21-RrrvP9c1XkY-hjbNk_PNneVeA3jyZewg7cxvbOrOOTnALURdDqHcFBki-gh39ARVFRWg522ZZpe1mB_g02wBvX2GrSmhQqrnR_DY36zqychne4hlZQOD_FMmk8LTUbzEktlymWXaJoiZYGByHT5mp_AqNMetrpO0T3BSQISLJwkwinhPMBKpDoEEc9PBSc0FjIQPFXUlzq1EsKTqaDcEyGVFMuYKBm6-k1EQR2q2TRTp4CCEAshiWFfF1i5ylDkGwRuQiPiRmnUAFyqjCUFtbjpcPHG1jVkWtPMaJrFlFlNM9KA-5XYLOfW-EuAlv-DfTskTPv_30XP_i96DbvdYb_Hek-Dl3PYs6BEU9LiXUB18f6hLnVWshBX9tR9AY-V2Og |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing+the+ecological+and+economic+sustainability+of+energy+crops&rft.jtitle=Biomass+%26+bioenergy&rft.au=Hanegraaf%2C+Marjoleine+C&rft.au=Biewinga%2C+Edo+E&rft.au=van+derBijl%2C+Gert&rft.date=1998-10-11&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=0961-9534&rft.eissn=1873-2909&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=355&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2FS0961-9534%2898%2900042-7&rft.externalDocID=S0961953498000427 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0961-9534&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0961-9534&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0961-9534&client=summon |