Comparison of cognitive functions among frail and prefrail older adults: a clinical perspective

ABSTRACTObjective:To compare cognitive function among frail and prefrail older adults. Cross-sectional clinical study. Fifty-one non-institutionalized older individuals participated in this study. Cognitive functions were evaluated through Mini-Mental State Examination (Global Cognition), Digit Span...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational psychogeriatrics Vol. 31; no. 2; pp. 297 - 301
Main Authors da Silva Alves, Bárbara Bispo, de Oliveira Barbosa, Elizabete, de Moraes Pimentel, Daniel, Carneiro, Lara S. F., Rodrigues, Ana Carolina M. A., Deslandes, Andréa Camaz, Alves, Mariana Rocha, Rodrigues, Vinícius Dias, Pereira, Ester Liberato, de Paula, Alfredo Maurício Batista, Pupe, Camila Castelo Branco, Monteiro-Junior, Renato Sobral
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.02.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACTObjective:To compare cognitive function among frail and prefrail older adults. Cross-sectional clinical study. Fifty-one non-institutionalized older individuals participated in this study. Cognitive functions were evaluated through Mini-Mental State Examination (Global Cognition), Digit Span Forward (short-term memory), Digit Span Backward (working memory), Verbal Fluency Test (semantic memory/executive function). Data were compared using parametric and non-parametric bivariate tests. Binary logistic regression was used to test a frailty prediction model. Statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.01 to compare groups. In the regression model, the p value was set to be ≤0.05. Statistically significant differences were observed in global cognition, and short-term memory between frail and prefrail individuals (p ≤ 0.01). Global cognition explained 14-19% of frailty's model. According to our findings, the evaluation of cognitive functions among older persons with frailty and prefrailty provides important complementary information to better manage frailty and its progression.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1041-6102
1741-203X
DOI:10.1017/S1041610218000765