Non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring patients with acoustic neuroma

To assess the feasibility of non-contrast T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as compared to T1-weighted post-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for detecting acoustic neuroma growth. Adult patients with acoustic neuroma who underwent at least three magnetic resonance imaging scans of the intern...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of laryngology and otology Vol. 132; no. 9; pp. 780 - 785
Main Authors Forgues, M, Mehta, R, Anderson, D, Morel, C, Miller, L, Sevy, A, Son, L, Arriaga, M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press 01.09.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To assess the feasibility of non-contrast T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as compared to T1-weighted post-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for detecting acoustic neuroma growth. Adult patients with acoustic neuroma who underwent at least three magnetic resonance imaging scans of the internal auditory canals with and without contrast in the past nine years were identified. T1- and T2-weighted images were reviewed by three neuroradiologists, and tumour size was measured. Accuracy of the measurements on T2-weighted images was defined as a difference of less than or equal to 2 mm from the measurement on T1-weighted images. A total of 107 magnetic resonance imaging scans of 26 patients were reviewed. Measurements on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans were 88 per cent accurate. Measurements on T2-weighted images differed from measurements on T1-weighted images by an average of 1.27 mm, or 10.4 per cent of the total size. The specificity of T2-weighted images was 88.2 per cent and the sensitivity was 77.8 per cent. The T2-weighted sequences are fairly accurate in measuring acoustic neuroma size and identifying growth if one keeps in mind the caveats associated with the tumour characteristics or location.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0022-2151
1748-5460
DOI:10.1017/S0022215118001342