Epidemiology of snakebites from a general hospital in Singapore: a 5-year retrospective review (2004-2008)
This is a retrospective study on the epidemiology of snakebites that were presented to an emergency department (ED) between 2004 and 2008. Snakebite cases were identified from International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code E905 and E906, as well as cases referred for eye injury from snake spit...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore Vol. 39; no. 8; pp. 640 - 647 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Singapore
01.08.2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | This is a retrospective study on the epidemiology of snakebites that were presented to an emergency department (ED) between 2004 and 2008.
Snakebite cases were identified from International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code E905 and E906, as well as cases referred for eye injury from snake spit and records of antivenom use.
Fifty-two cases were identified: 13 patients witnessed the snake biting or spitting at them, 22 patients had fang marks and/or clinical features of envenomations and a snake was seen and the remaining 17 patients did not see any snake but had fang marks suggestive of snakebite. Most of the patients were young (mean age 33) and male (83%). The three most commonly identified snakes were cobras (7), pythons (4) and vipers (3). One third of cases occurred during work. Half of the bites were on the upper limbs and about half were on the lower limbs. One patient was spat in the eye by a cobra. Most of the patients (83%) arrived at the ED within 4 hours of the bite. Pain and swelling were the most common presentations. There were no significant systemic effects reported. Two patients had infection and 5 patients had elevated creatine kinase (>600U/L). Two thirds of the patients were admitted. One patient received antivenom therapy and 5 patients had some form of surgical intervention, of which 2 had residual disability. One patient had heparin instilled in the eye for eye injury from cobra spit.
Snakebite infrequently presents to the ED. Most of the patients developed local effects that do well with supportive treatment. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This is a retrospective study on the epidemiology of snakebites that were presented to an emergency department (ED) between 2004 and 2008.
Snakebite cases were identified from International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code E905 and E906, as well as cases referred for eye injury from snake spit and records of antivenom use.
Fifty-two cases were identified: 13 patients witnessed the snake biting or spitting at them, 22 patients had fang marks and/or clinical features of envenomations and a snake was seen and the remaining 17 patients did not see any snake but had fang marks suggestive of snakebite. Most of the patients were young (mean age 33) and male (83%). The three most commonly identified snakes were cobras (7), pythons (4) and vipers (3). One third of cases occurred during work. Half of the bites were on the upper limbs and about half were on the lower limbs. One patient was spat in the eye by a cobra. Most of the patients (83%) arrived at the ED within 4 hours of the bite. Pain and swelling were the most common presentations. There were no significant systemic effects reported. Two patients had infection and 5 patients had elevated creatine kinase (>600U/L). Two thirds of the patients were admitted. One patient received antivenom therapy and 5 patients had some form of surgical intervention, of which 2 had residual disability. One patient had heparin instilled in the eye for eye injury from cobra spit.
Snakebite infrequently presents to the ED. Most of the patients developed local effects that do well with supportive treatment. Introduction: This is a retrospective study on the epidemiology of snakebites that were presented to an emergency department (ED) between 2004 and 2008. Materials and Methods: Snakebite cases were identified from International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code E905 and E906, as well as cases referred for eye injury from snake spit and records of antivenom use. Results: Fifty-two cases were identified: 13 patients witnessed the snake biting or spitting at them, 22 patients had fang marks and/or clinical features of envenomations and a snake was seen and the remaining 17 patients did not see any snake but had fang marks suggestive of snakebite. Most of the patients were young (mean age 33) and male (83%). The three most commonly identified snakes were cobras (7), pythons (4) and vipers (3). One third of cases occurred during work. Half of the bites were on the upper limbs and about half were on the lower limbs. One patient was spat in the eye by a cobra. Most of the patients (83%) arrived at the ED within 4 hours of the bite. Pain and swelling were the most common presentations. There were no significant systemic effects reported. Two patients had infection and 5 patients had elevated creatine kinase (>600U/L). Two thirds of the patients were admitted. One patient received antivenom therapy and 5 patients had some form of surgical intervention, of which 2 had residual disability. One patient had heparin instilled in the eye for eye injury from cobra spit. Conclusions: Snakebite infrequently presents to the ED. Most of the patients developed local effects that do well with supportive treatment. Key words: Antivenom, Cobra, Envenomomation, Spit, Viper INTRODUCTIONThis is a retrospective study on the epidemiology of snakebites that were presented to an emergency department (ED) between 2004 and 2008. MATERIALS AND METHODSSnakebite cases were identified from International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code E905 and E906, as well as cases referred for eye injury from snake spit and records of antivenom use. RESULTSFifty-two cases were identified: 13 patients witnessed the snake biting or spitting at them, 22 patients had fang marks and/or clinical features of envenomations and a snake was seen and the remaining 17 patients did not see any snake but had fang marks suggestive of snakebite. Most of the patients were young (mean age 33) and male (83%). The three most commonly identified snakes were cobras (7), pythons (4) and vipers (3). One third of cases occurred during work. Half of the bites were on the upper limbs and about half were on the lower limbs. One patient was spat in the eye by a cobra. Most of the patients (83%) arrived at the ED within 4 hours of the bite. Pain and swelling were the most common presentations. There were no significant systemic effects reported. Two patients had infection and 5 patients had elevated creatine kinase (>600U/L). Two thirds of the patients were admitted. One patient received antivenom therapy and 5 patients had some form of surgical intervention, of which 2 had residual disability. One patient had heparin instilled in the eye for eye injury from cobra spit. CONCLUSIONSSnakebite infrequently presents to the ED. Most of the patients developed local effects that do well with supportive treatment. |
Author | Tan, Hock Heng |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Hock Heng surname: Tan fullname: Tan, Hock Heng email: hock_heng_tan@cgh.com.sg organization: Department of Emergency Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore. hock_heng_tan@cgh.com.sg |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20838707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpNkMtOwzAQRS1UBC3wC8gSC2ARcGwndmCFqvKQKljw2EZOMi6GxA52CurfY1Go2MxDc2fu6EzQyDoLCB2l5IyLlNBzZa1qQ6Jq1XTQhMXZCyvuZZ9zsoXGhBGe8JzQ0b96F01CeCOEC0LzHbRLiWRSEDFGb7PeNNAZ17rFCjuNg1XvUJkBAtbedVjhBVjwqsWvLvRmiIWx-NHYheqdh4soyJIVKI89DD5KoB7MJ8Tu08AXPqHRNYlBnu6jbR3_hoPfvIeer2dP09tk_nBzN72aJzUTbEhSxpQsVCFYlmtGpWpkkTdKaM0ppRxyWdQ0A6mVqEgmWV1nPBeN1hVPSVFlbA8dr-_23n0sIQxlZ0INbassuGUoRZalokg5i8rLtbKOjwcPuuy96ZRflSkpf1iXa9blhnW5YR23D399llWcbXb_4LJv_I-BZg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wem_2016_01_001 crossref_primary_10_18410_jebmh_2019_256 crossref_primary_10_11646_zootaxa_5287_1_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wem_2014_10_007 crossref_primary_10_1097_GOX_0000000000003778 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2022_816795 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12593_013_0102_6 crossref_primary_10_1177_0748233712472522 crossref_primary_10_7705_biomedica_v32i3_591 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jprot_2019_103418 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jflm_2016_01_013 crossref_primary_10_1155_2013_247645 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2023_105024 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0229989 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jemrpt_2024_100074 |
Cites_doi | 10.1590/s0036-46651992000600002 10.1016/s1607-551x(08)70009-3 10.1081/clt-120028743 10.1580/08-weme-or-219.1 10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.02.010 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb122122.x 10.1016/0041-0101(95)00139-5 10.1007/bf02725623 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90463-m 10.1016/b978-044481557-6/50035-6 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050218 10.1067/mem.2001.113373 10.1580/07-weme-ed-099r.1 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.11.011 10.1080/15563650600584451 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V34N5p356 10.1580/06-weme-co-023r1.1 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
DOI | 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V39N8p640 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 0304-4602 |
EndPage | 647 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_47102_annals_acadmedsg_V39N8p640 20838707 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | Singapore |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Singapore |
GroupedDBID | --- .GJ 2WC 53G ABDBF ACGFO ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 NPM OK1 P2P P6G SJN TR2 AAYXX CITATION 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-133a89a97356f328ad896da7ff42224e689c25e8fa7b0583cc5467dffb4109b53 |
ISSN | 0304-4602 |
IngestDate | Fri Jun 28 16:17:46 EDT 2024 Fri Dec 06 03:53:59 EST 2024 Thu May 23 23:15:29 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c373t-133a89a97356f328ad896da7ff42224e689c25e8fa7b0583cc5467dffb4109b53 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v39n8p640 |
PMID | 20838707 |
PQID | 755179143 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_755179143 crossref_primary_10_47102_annals_acadmedsg_V39N8p640 pubmed_primary_20838707 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2010-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2010 text: 2010-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Singapore |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Singapore |
PublicationTitle | Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ann Acad Med Singapore |
PublicationYear | 2010 |
References | ref13 ref12 ref15 ref14 ref11 ref10 ref0 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 ref28 ref27 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 |
References_xml | – ident: ref1 – ident: ref3 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1590/s0036-46651992000600002 – ident: ref20 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.1016/s1607-551x(08)70009-3 – ident: ref22 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1081/clt-120028743 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1580/08-weme-or-219.1 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.02.010 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1996.tb122122.x – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1016/0041-0101(95)00139-5 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1007/bf02725623 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90463-m – ident: ref15 – ident: ref0 doi: 10.1016/b978-044481557-6/50035-6 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050218 – ident: ref4 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.113373 – ident: ref6 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.1580/07-weme-ed-099r.1 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.11.011 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1080/15563650600584451 – ident: ref27 doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V34N5p356 – ident: ref28 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1580/06-weme-co-023r1.1 – ident: ref8 – ident: ref10 – ident: ref12 – ident: ref14 |
SSID | ssj0047026 |
Score | 2.0145323 |
Snippet | This is a retrospective study on the epidemiology of snakebites that were presented to an emergency department (ED) between 2004 and 2008.
Snakebite cases were... Introduction: This is a retrospective study on the epidemiology of snakebites that were presented to an emergency department (ED) between 2004 and 2008.... INTRODUCTIONThis is a retrospective study on the epidemiology of snakebites that were presented to an emergency department (ED) between 2004 and 2008.... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 640 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Aged Animals Antivenins - therapeutic use Elapidae Female Hospitals, General - statistics & numerical data Humans Male Middle Aged Retrospective Studies Saliva Singapore - epidemiology Snake Bites - drug therapy Snake Bites - epidemiology Time Factors Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
Title | Epidemiology of snakebites from a general hospital in Singapore: a 5-year retrospective review (2004-2008) |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20838707 https://search.proquest.com/docview/755179143 |
Volume | 39 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELaWIlVcKt4sL1mCAxxSsvEz3FaosEJqD7RFe4ucxEYFKbtqs4dy538zfiYtrVR6iVbe1Tj2zM7LM58ReisVz1sFkWrTSJbRRreZNJxmTa4kgy9pYWy-Y_-AL47p1yVbTiZ_RlVLm77ebX5f2VdyG67CGPDVdsn-B2cTURiAz8BfeAKH4XkjHu8N17u6g_LDTv3S9YlNpbq2kXlElU7Xg9j0xqG9BXtt62tdVzrLzi2Yzzfdn65i32XE2wf309WQ2PKFmDP4B3nZNacMjSn74bTe5VXjVEOCwGm5BWhhsHjBaoakw6jkLTVbwdyU516R6ivGgnL1SEVBiORIU3KP0hSMLvewm5f1ObX-j0cyhiVlCtYCPsLZj93vpDyQ60RjjKJ9ybqlmkOIdhy5yhOrErEqEbuD7lo8RXsFw5dlqhSiIi_8kXdY3zZ6E9_tw_VvdtHRuSZ6cV7M0X20E8IPPPey9ABNdPcQbUeWPUI_xyKFVwYPIoWtSOE5DiKFo0jhkw4nPn-EH3iBwhcECnuBwu-SOL1_jI4_7x19WmThOo6sIYL02YwQJUtVCsK4IYVUrSx5q4QxNo1INZdlUzAtjRJ1ziRpGgZWuDWmprO8rBl5gra6VaefIWxq0RClZjMiDLVnzVzUNvI1CvxJUBJTROPeVWuPulLdgH9ThOM-V6Al7dGX6vRqc1YJZqHoIDaYoqd-_xPdAoIQMFri-e3mfIHuDX-Ql2irP93oV-Cn9vVrJ0V_Aa9zkbY |
link.rule.ids | 314,780,784,27924,27925 |
linkProvider | Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiology+of+Snakebites+from+A+General+Hospital+in+Singapore%3A+A+5-year+Retrospective+Review+%282004-2008%29&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+the+Academy+of+Medicine%2C+Singapore&rft.au=Tan%2C+Hock+Heng&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.issn=0304-4602&rft.eissn=0304-4602&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=640&rft.epage=647&rft_id=info:doi/10.47102%2Fannals-acadmedsg.V39N8p640&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_47102_annals_acadmedsg_V39N8p640 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0304-4602&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0304-4602&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0304-4602&client=summon |