Comparison of plastic stent versus metal stent in preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic head cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences Vol. 28; no. 10; pp. 856 - 863
Main Authors Kobayashi, Kiyoyuki, Kobara, Hideki, Kamada, Hideki, Kohno, Toshiaki, Namima, Daisuke, Fujita, Naoki, Yamana, Hiroki, Fujihara, Shintaro, Okano, Keiichi, Masaki, Tsutomu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.10.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent type is unclear. We compared plastic stents (PS) and metal stents (MS) in these situations. Methods We retrospectively studied 43 patients who successfully underwent preoperative EBD prior to NACRT for pancreatic head cancer at a single institution. We divided patients into PS (n = 22) and MS (n = 21) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of re‐interventional drainage rate before surgery. Secondary outcomes were rates of EBD‐associated and postoperative complications and total costs in the pre‐ and perioperative periods. Results The re‐intervention rate was significantly greater in the PS group than in the MS group (95% vs 4.8%, respectively, P < 0.05). EBD‐associated and postoperative complications were significantly less common in the MS group (P < 0.05). The average total preoperative medical costs were significantly lower in the MS group (PS vs MS: 528,597 vs 395,891 JPY, P = 0.004). Conclusions MS can be the first choice for EBD in patients undergoing NACRT for pancreatic head cancer. MS may be less costly overall. Highlight Retrospectively comparing the efficacy and cost‐benefit of plastic stents versus metal stents in preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for pancreatic head cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, Kobayashi and colleagues concluded that metal stents can be the first choice. Metal stents were also found to be more cost‐beneficial in the preoperative period.
AbstractList BackgroundWhile neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent type is unclear. We compared plastic stents (PS) and metal stents (MS) in these situations.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 43 patients who successfully underwent preoperative EBD prior to NACRT for pancreatic head cancer at a single institution. We divided patients into PS (n = 22) and MS (n = 21) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of re‐interventional drainage rate before surgery. Secondary outcomes were rates of EBD‐associated and postoperative complications and total costs in the pre‐ and perioperative periods.ResultsThe re‐intervention rate was significantly greater in the PS group than in the MS group (95% vs 4.8%, respectively, P < 0.05). EBD‐associated and postoperative complications were significantly less common in the MS group (P < 0.05). The average total preoperative medical costs were significantly lower in the MS group (PS vs MS: 528,597 vs 395,891 JPY, P = 0.004).ConclusionsMS can be the first choice for EBD in patients undergoing NACRT for pancreatic head cancer. MS may be less costly overall.
Abstract Background While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent type is unclear. We compared plastic stents (PS) and metal stents (MS) in these situations. Methods We retrospectively studied 43 patients who successfully underwent preoperative EBD prior to NACRT for pancreatic head cancer at a single institution. We divided patients into PS (n = 22) and MS (n = 21) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of re‐interventional drainage rate before surgery. Secondary outcomes were rates of EBD‐associated and postoperative complications and total costs in the pre‐ and perioperative periods. Results The re‐intervention rate was significantly greater in the PS group than in the MS group (95% vs 4.8%, respectively, P  < 0.05). EBD‐associated and postoperative complications were significantly less common in the MS group ( P  < 0.05). The average total preoperative medical costs were significantly lower in the MS group (PS vs MS: 528,597 vs 395,891 JPY, P  = 0.004). Conclusions MS can be the first choice for EBD in patients undergoing NACRT for pancreatic head cancer. MS may be less costly overall.
Background While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent type is unclear. We compared plastic stents (PS) and metal stents (MS) in these situations. Methods We retrospectively studied 43 patients who successfully underwent preoperative EBD prior to NACRT for pancreatic head cancer at a single institution. We divided patients into PS (n = 22) and MS (n = 21) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of re‐interventional drainage rate before surgery. Secondary outcomes were rates of EBD‐associated and postoperative complications and total costs in the pre‐ and perioperative periods. Results The re‐intervention rate was significantly greater in the PS group than in the MS group (95% vs 4.8%, respectively, P < 0.05). EBD‐associated and postoperative complications were significantly less common in the MS group (P < 0.05). The average total preoperative medical costs were significantly lower in the MS group (PS vs MS: 528,597 vs 395,891 JPY, P = 0.004). Conclusions MS can be the first choice for EBD in patients undergoing NACRT for pancreatic head cancer. MS may be less costly overall. Highlight Retrospectively comparing the efficacy and cost‐benefit of plastic stents versus metal stents in preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for pancreatic head cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, Kobayashi and colleagues concluded that metal stents can be the first choice. Metal stents were also found to be more cost‐beneficial in the preoperative period.
While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent type is unclear. We compared plastic stents (PS) and metal stents (MS) in these situations. We retrospectively studied 43 patients who successfully underwent preoperative EBD prior to NACRT for pancreatic head cancer at a single institution. We divided patients into PS (n = 22) and MS (n = 21) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of re-interventional drainage rate before surgery. Secondary outcomes were rates of EBD-associated and postoperative complications and total costs in the pre- and perioperative periods. The re-intervention rate was significantly greater in the PS group than in the MS group (95% vs 4.8%, respectively, P < 0.05). EBD-associated and postoperative complications were significantly less common in the MS group (P < 0.05). The average total preoperative medical costs were significantly lower in the MS group (PS vs MS: 528,597 vs 395,891 JPY, P = 0.004). MS can be the first choice for EBD in patients undergoing NACRT for pancreatic head cancer. MS may be less costly overall.
Author Kobara, Hideki
Yamana, Hiroki
Namima, Daisuke
Kobayashi, Kiyoyuki
Masaki, Tsutomu
Kohno, Toshiaki
Fujita, Naoki
Fujihara, Shintaro
Kamada, Hideki
Okano, Keiichi
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Kiyoyuki
  orcidid: 0000-0002-1793-1587
  surname: Kobayashi
  fullname: Kobayashi, Kiyoyuki
  email: koba0415@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp
  organization: Kagawa University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hideki
  surname: Kobara
  fullname: Kobara, Hideki
  organization: Kagawa University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hideki
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0715-645X
  surname: Kamada
  fullname: Kamada, Hideki
  organization: Kagawa University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Toshiaki
  surname: Kohno
  fullname: Kohno, Toshiaki
  organization: Kagawa University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Daisuke
  surname: Namima
  fullname: Namima, Daisuke
  organization: Kagawa University
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Naoki
  surname: Fujita
  fullname: Fujita, Naoki
  organization: Kagawa University
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Hiroki
  surname: Yamana
  fullname: Yamana, Hiroki
  organization: Kagawa University
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Shintaro
  surname: Fujihara
  fullname: Fujihara, Shintaro
  organization: Kagawa University
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Keiichi
  surname: Okano
  fullname: Okano, Keiichi
  organization: Kagawa University
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Tsutomu
  surname: Masaki
  fullname: Masaki, Tsutomu
  organization: Kagawa University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kc9u1DAQhy1UREupxBMgS1y4pPhfEvsIq0JBleAAZ2vWmRCvEjvYyVb7ELwzXnUpEhK-jD3-9Gns33NyFmJAQl5yds0ZE293w3a-NsI8IRdcN7pqjBZnj_tWnZOrnHesLMmlkewZOZeyUapgF-TXJk4zJJ9joLGn8wh58Y7mBcNC95jymumEC4ynlg90ThhnTLD4PdKtHz2kA-0S-AA_kPYx0RmCSwhH0YDQUVfOmOi9XwYaMEK3W_dQZG7AKSbofFyGIpwPL8jTHsaMV6d6Sb5_uPm2ua3uvnz8tHl3VznZSlMJIZmoG6G6tgGpGG-U04Y709eMNaDRmPJUbLEGJ6RxTgJq3HLOe1HuanlJ3jx45xR_rpgXO_nscByhjLdmK5RRWrfMqIK-_gfdxTWFMp0VtW5qw3kr_wpdijkn7O2c_FQ-xnJmjynZY0q2pFTQVyfhup2wewT_ZFKA6gG49yMe_iuyn2_ffz0KfwO3Fp9k
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1239
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12196245
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1090
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1240
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_023_02874_5
crossref_primary_10_1002_deo2_263
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2023_10_023
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_875504
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_023_14523_y
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.42031.x
10.1038/ajg.2013.93
10.1002/jhbp.640
10.1007/s00268-018-4820-6
10.1007/s00066-014-0737-7
10.1002/jhbp.631
10.21873/invivo.11700
10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.006
10.1002/jhbp.609
10.1155/2016/7968201
10.1007/s00535-016-1217-x
10.1056/NEJMoa0903230
10.1002/jhbp.652
10.1002/jhbp.778
10.5009/gnl18573
10.1111/den.12049
10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308762
10.1097/SLA.0000000000002705
10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.044
10.1111/den.12894
10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.012
10.1007/s00280-016-3199-z
10.1136/gut.46.5.725
10.1002/jhbp.671
10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00127-3
10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816539
10.1055/s-2007-1010294
10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.047
10.1016/0140-6736(92)92752-2
10.1002/cncr.26594
10.1002/jhbp.693
10.1245/s10434-017-5921-4
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery
2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
Copyright © 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery
– notice: 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
– notice: Copyright © 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery
DBID NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
K9.
7X8
DOI 10.1002/jhbp.929
DatabaseName PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1868-6982
EndPage 863
ExternalDocumentID 10_1002_jhbp_929
33644982
JHBP929
Genre article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-5E
-5G
-BR
-Y2
0R~
0VY
1OC
2JY
2~H
30V
33P
3SF
4.4
52U
52V
53G
5VS
8-1
8TC
8UJ
95.
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAIAL
AANLZ
AANXM
AAONW
AARHV
AARTL
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCUV
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABQWH
ABTEG
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACBXY
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACOMO
ACPOU
ACREN
ACXBN
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADINQ
ADIZJ
ADKPE
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADQRH
ADRFC
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEGNC
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AFBBN
AFBPY
AFEXP
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFLOW
AFPWT
AFWTZ
AGJBK
AHBTC
AHBYD
AHKAY
AHMBA
AHSBF
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BGNMA
BHBCM
BMXJE
BRXPI
C45
CSCUP
DCZOG
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
EN4
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
GODZA
GQ6
GQ8
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HMJXF
HVGLF
HZ~
IZIGR
JBSCW
KBYEO
LATKE
LEEKS
LITHE
LOXES
LUTES
LYRES
M4Y
MA-
MEWTI
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
MY~
N2Q
NF~
NU0
O66
O9-
O93
O9I
OVD
P2W
P9S
PQQKQ
Q.N
QB0
QOS
R89
ROL
RSV
S37
S3B
SDE
SMD
SOJ
SUPJJ
SV3
SZN
TEORI
TSV
TUC
VC2
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WK8
WOHZO
WVDHM
WXSBR
Z45
Z7U
Z82
Z87
Z8V
~EX
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
K9.
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3739-223025624d76a340164c891c9f5006a8e99313e7e5ac239cc3ae8eb111f2e9953
ISSN 1868-6974
IngestDate Fri Aug 16 02:08:36 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 17:26:38 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 02:01:57 EDT 2024
Sat Sep 28 08:25:31 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 00:59:09 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Keywords obstructive jaundice
pancreatic neoplasms
cholangitis
neoadjuvant therapy
stents
Language English
License 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3739-223025624d76a340164c891c9f5006a8e99313e7e5ac239cc3ae8eb111f2e9953
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-0715-645X
0000-0002-1793-1587
PMID 33644982
PQID 2586591173
PQPubID 2034613
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_2494887094
proquest_journals_2586591173
crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_929
pubmed_primary_33644982
wiley_primary_10_1002_jhbp_929_JHBP929
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate October 2021
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2021
  text: October 2021
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
– name: Tokyo
PublicationTitle Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences
PublicationTitleAlternate J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 1993; 25
2010; 57
1992; 340
2013; 108
2015; 149
2019; 33
2000; 46
2004; 8
2017; 24
2018; 268
2010; 362
2020; 14
2016; 2016
1996; 201
2003; 196
2017; 52
2015; 191
2012; 3
2005; 100
2019; 43
2005; 9
2017; 79
2019; 26
2015; 65
2020; 27
2016; 84
2018; 30
2014; 6
2012; 118
e_1_2_6_32_1
e_1_2_6_10_1
e_1_2_6_31_1
Adams MA (e_1_2_6_30_1) 2012; 3
e_1_2_6_19_1
e_1_2_6_13_1
e_1_2_6_36_1
e_1_2_6_14_1
e_1_2_6_35_1
e_1_2_6_11_1
Lin SC (e_1_2_6_22_1) 2010; 57
e_1_2_6_34_1
e_1_2_6_12_1
e_1_2_6_33_1
e_1_2_6_17_1
e_1_2_6_18_1
e_1_2_6_15_1
e_1_2_6_16_1
e_1_2_6_21_1
e_1_2_6_20_1
e_1_2_6_9_1
e_1_2_6_8_1
e_1_2_6_5_1
e_1_2_6_4_1
e_1_2_6_7_1
e_1_2_6_6_1
e_1_2_6_25_1
e_1_2_6_24_1
e_1_2_6_3_1
e_1_2_6_23_1
e_1_2_6_2_1
e_1_2_6_29_1
e_1_2_6_28_1
e_1_2_6_27_1
e_1_2_6_26_1
References_xml – volume: 100
  start-page: 2056
  year: 2005
  end-page: 61
  article-title: Use of expandable metallic stents in resectable pancreatic cancer
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– volume: 79
  start-page: 37
  year: 2017
  end-page: 47
  article-title: Survival impact of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S‐1 chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma with arterial contact
  publication-title: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 524
  year: 2019
  end-page: 33
  article-title: Upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy in severely jaundiced patients: is it safe?
  publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
– volume: 108
  start-page: 1168
  year: 2013
  end-page: 73
  article-title: Biliary self‐expandable metal stents do not adversely affect pancreaticoduodenectomy
  publication-title: AM. J. Gastroenterol
– volume: 362
  start-page: 129
  year: 2010
  end-page: 37
  article-title: Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 30
  start-page: 90
  year: 2018
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Influence of cholangitis after preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage on postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with middle and lower malignant biliary strictures
  publication-title: Dig Endosc
– volume: 26
  start-page: 341
  year: 2019
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Preoperative course of patients undergoing endoscopic nasobiliary drainage during the management of resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
  publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
– volume: 2016
  start-page: 7968201
  year: 2016
  article-title: Preoperative biliary drainage of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery
  publication-title: Gastroenterol Res Pract
– volume: 65
  start-page: 1981
  year: 2015
  end-page: 7
  article-title: Metal or plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 84
  start-page: 460
  year: 2016
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Cost‐effectiveness and clinical efficacy of biliary stents in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 33
  start-page: 2027
  year: 2019
  end-page: 35
  article-title: Clinical significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S‐1 for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  publication-title: Vivo
– volume: 196
  start-page: 859
  year: 2003
  end-page: 65
  article-title: Factors influencing delayed gastric emptying after pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
– volume: 3
  start-page: 309
  year: 2012
  end-page: 13
  article-title: Self‐expanding metal stents (SEMS) provide superior outcomes compared to plastic stents for pancreatic cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Oncol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 249
  year: 2019
  end-page: 69
  article-title: Clinical practice guidelines for safe performance of endoscopic ultrasound/ultrasonography‐guided biliary drainage: 2018
  publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
– volume: 43
  start-page: 642
  year: 2019
  end-page: 8
  article-title: A comparison between plastic and metallic biliary stent placement in patients receiving preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer
  publication-title: World J Surg
– volume: 27
  start-page: 149
  year: 2020
  end-page: 50
  article-title: A novel integrated inside biliary stent and nasobiliary drainage catheter system for biliary drainage (with video)
  publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
– volume: 201
  start-page: 167
  year: 1996
  end-page: 72
  article-title: Common bile duct obstruction due to malignancy: treatment with plastic versus metal stents
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 57
  start-page: 698
  year: 2010
  end-page: 705
  article-title: Adequate preoperative biliary drainage is determinative to decrease postoperative infectious complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy
  publication-title: Hepatogastroenterology
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1094
  year: 2005
  end-page: 104
  article-title: Pancreaticoduodenectomy after placement of endobiliary metal stents
  publication-title: J Gatrointest Surg
– volume: 46
  start-page: 725
  year: 2000
  end-page: 31
  article-title: Endotoxin, cytokines, and endotoxin binding proteins in obstructive jaundice and after preoperative biliary drainage
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 26
  start-page: E3
  year: 2019
  end-page: E4
  article-title: Novel fine gauge electrocautery dilator for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video)
  publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
– volume: 268
  start-page: 215
  year: 2018
  end-page: 22
  article-title: Oncological benefits of neoadjuvant chemoradiation with gemcitabine versus upfront surgery in patients with borderline Resectable pancreatic Cancer: a prospective, randomized, open‐label, multicenter phase 2/3 trial
  publication-title: Ann Surg
– volume: 25
  start-page: 207
  year: 1993
  end-page: 12
  article-title: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of metal stents for malignant obstruction of the common bile duct
  publication-title: Endoscopy
– volume: 14
  start-page: 269
  year: 2020
  end-page: 73
  article-title: Clinical outcomes of biliary drainage during a neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: metal versus plastic stents
  publication-title: Gut Liv
– volume: 6
  start-page: 77
  year: 2014
  end-page: 86
  article-title: Covered self‐expandable metal stent deployment promises safe neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer
  publication-title: Dig Endosc
– volume: 118
  start-page: 2813
  year: 2012
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Real‐time detection of hepatic micrometastases from pancreatic cancer by intraoperative fluorescence imaging: preliminary results of a prospective study
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 149
  start-page: 130
  year: 2015
  end-page: 8
  article-title: Cost efficacy of metal stents for palliation of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction in a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
– volume: 340
  start-page: 1488
  year: 1992
  end-page: 92
  article-title: Randomised trial of self‐expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 8
  start-page: 951
  year: 2004
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg
– volume: 191
  start-page: 7
  year: 2015
  end-page: 16
  article-title: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin and surgery versus immediate surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: results of the first prospective randomized phase II trial
  publication-title: Strahlenther Onkol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 449
  year: 2019
  end-page: 58
  article-title: Optimal timing of pancreaticoduodenectomy following preoperative biliary drainage considering major morbidity and postoperative survival
  publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
– volume: 52
  start-page: 81
  year: 2017
  end-page: 93
  article-title: Clinical benefits of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: an observational study using inverse probability of treatment weighting
  publication-title: J Gastroenterol
– volume: 24
  start-page: 2777
  year: 2017
  end-page: 84
  article-title: A prospective phase II trial of neoadjuvant S‐1 with concurrent hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol
– volume: 27
  start-page: 851
  year: 2020
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Risk factors for dysfunction of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction
  publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci
– ident: e_1_2_6_29_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.42031.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_31_1
  doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.93
– ident: e_1_2_6_18_1
  doi: 10.1002/jhbp.640
– ident: e_1_2_6_8_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4820-6
– ident: e_1_2_6_13_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00066-014-0737-7
– ident: e_1_2_6_35_1
  doi: 10.1002/jhbp.631
– ident: e_1_2_6_24_1
  doi: 10.21873/invivo.11700
– ident: e_1_2_6_28_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.006
– ident: e_1_2_6_36_1
  doi: 10.1002/jhbp.609
– ident: e_1_2_6_6_1
  doi: 10.1155/2016/7968201
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1217-x
– volume: 3
  start-page: 309
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_6_30_1
  article-title: Self‐expanding metal stents (SEMS) provide superior outcomes compared to plastic stents for pancreatic cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy
  publication-title: J Gastrointest Oncol
  contributor:
    fullname: Adams MA
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_1
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903230
– ident: e_1_2_6_25_1
  doi: 10.1002/jhbp.652
– ident: e_1_2_6_17_1
  doi: 10.1002/jhbp.778
– ident: e_1_2_6_7_1
  doi: 10.5009/gnl18573
– ident: e_1_2_6_9_1
  doi: 10.1111/den.12049
– ident: e_1_2_6_5_1
  doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308762
– ident: e_1_2_6_12_1
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002705
– ident: e_1_2_6_32_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.044
– ident: e_1_2_6_20_1
  doi: 10.1111/den.12894
– ident: e_1_2_6_34_1
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.012
– ident: e_1_2_6_15_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3199-z
– ident: e_1_2_6_21_1
  doi: 10.1136/gut.46.5.725
– volume: 57
  start-page: 698
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_6_22_1
  article-title: Adequate preoperative biliary drainage is determinative to decrease postoperative infectious complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy
  publication-title: Hepatogastroenterology
  contributor:
    fullname: Lin SC
– ident: e_1_2_6_19_1
  doi: 10.1002/jhbp.671
– ident: e_1_2_6_33_1
  doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00127-3
– ident: e_1_2_6_3_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_27_1
  doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816539
– ident: e_1_2_6_26_1
  doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010294
– ident: e_1_2_6_23_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.047
– ident: e_1_2_6_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92752-2
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_1
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.26594
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_1
  doi: 10.1002/jhbp.693
– ident: e_1_2_6_10_1
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5921-4
SSID ssj0000313930
Score 2.4092844
Snippet Background While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage...
While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is...
Abstract Background While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary...
BackgroundWhile neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD)...
BACKGROUNDWhile neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD)...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 856
SubjectTerms Chemotherapy
cholangitis
neoadjuvant therapy
obstructive jaundice
Pancreatic cancer
pancreatic neoplasms
Radiation therapy
Stents
Title Comparison of plastic stent versus metal stent in preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic head cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjhbp.929
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644982
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2586591173
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2494887094
Volume 28
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NjtMwELbK7oULAvFXWJCREJcqpYmT1DluV1tVq6VwaKXeIid21SzapOomh_IOPCBvw0zspI66oIVLWo0rO_V8mfnsjGcI-egmXILjCBwlhXB8GYQOuBEXHjyVgjuUSaBwofhlHs6W_tUqWPV6v6yopapMhumPe8-V_I9WQQZ6xVOy_6DZtlMQwHfQL1xBw3B9kI4v7CKCWBAaky4PQG95OcBwi-oOK0TXJ0JQhAHjO1Vslcn2jXGxGDQnsUwExu5gyCFYB00k69zXEqPCUrXT-7W5KoS8qYB8lwNQ9i3AR2bmCFfn9bBFczfg78rCMWM5VvfG-R7eJoFp2WNtp9r4ZPtiX33P7Ma6JNJglkllycWtkPfJi01dVHywKKBHYRrM9obntoFyDzWilvHmIXfCSFf9GSpbxjsW3-M2skeW_eZBaFMBbXuPvIzOWnuzSbbDyOzXdBJ5z7_G0-X1dby4XC0ekVMPbCAY39Pz6WQybzcAMWlmVNfCae-7SY488j43nXfp0tEaqLukqjnR4il5YrRMzzUyn5Geyp-TnwdU0mJNDSppDUGqUUlrVBpRllMbldQghTaopIBKeoANRVRSjUqKqKQWKukRKl-Q5fRycTFzTNEPJ2VjFjlAV5GGe74ch4L5mAEu5ZGbRusAHITgCiyIy9RYBSL1WJSmTCgOhMN11x60BewlOcmLXL0mNPHXAoviRmPu-0C8-UgxIVwRpknIknDUJx-auY23OrdLrLN4ezHOfwzz3ydnzaTH5sm_i72AhwGwhDGDLtpmsMv4sk3Av67gN5h3CZxh5PfJK62sdhDGYBUCmOyTT7X2_jh6fDWbfIPPN3-_i7fk8eHROSMn5a5S74Arl8l7g7rfyzPLOw
link.rule.ids 315,783,787,27936,27937
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+plastic+stent+versus+metal+stent+in+preoperative+biliary+drainage+for+pancreatic+head+cancer+with+neoadjuvant+chemoradiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+hepato-biliary-pancreatic+sciences&rft.au=Kobayashi%2C+Kiyoyuki&rft.au=Kobara%2C+Hideki&rft.au=Kamada%2C+Hideki&rft.au=Kohno%2C+Toshiaki&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1868-6974&rft.eissn=1868-6982&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=856&rft.epage=863&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjhbp.929&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon