Comparison of plastic stent versus metal stent in preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic head cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Background While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences Vol. 28; no. 10; pp. 856 - 863 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japan
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01.10.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent type is unclear. We compared plastic stents (PS) and metal stents (MS) in these situations.
Methods
We retrospectively studied 43 patients who successfully underwent preoperative EBD prior to NACRT for pancreatic head cancer at a single institution. We divided patients into PS (n = 22) and MS (n = 21) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of re‐interventional drainage rate before surgery. Secondary outcomes were rates of EBD‐associated and postoperative complications and total costs in the pre‐ and perioperative periods.
Results
The re‐intervention rate was significantly greater in the PS group than in the MS group (95% vs 4.8%, respectively, P < 0.05). EBD‐associated and postoperative complications were significantly less common in the MS group (P < 0.05). The average total preoperative medical costs were significantly lower in the MS group (PS vs MS: 528,597 vs 395,891 JPY, P = 0.004).
Conclusions
MS can be the first choice for EBD in patients undergoing NACRT for pancreatic head cancer. MS may be less costly overall.
Highlight
Retrospectively comparing the efficacy and cost‐benefit of plastic stents versus metal stents in preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for pancreatic head cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, Kobayashi and colleagues concluded that metal stents can be the first choice. Metal stents were also found to be more cost‐beneficial in the preoperative period. |
---|---|
AbstractList | BackgroundWhile neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent type is unclear. We compared plastic stents (PS) and metal stents (MS) in these situations.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 43 patients who successfully underwent preoperative EBD prior to NACRT for pancreatic head cancer at a single institution. We divided patients into PS (n = 22) and MS (n = 21) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of re‐interventional drainage rate before surgery. Secondary outcomes were rates of EBD‐associated and postoperative complications and total costs in the pre‐ and perioperative periods.ResultsThe re‐intervention rate was significantly greater in the PS group than in the MS group (95% vs 4.8%, respectively, P < 0.05). EBD‐associated and postoperative complications were significantly less common in the MS group (P < 0.05). The average total preoperative medical costs were significantly lower in the MS group (PS vs MS: 528,597 vs 395,891 JPY, P = 0.004).ConclusionsMS can be the first choice for EBD in patients undergoing NACRT for pancreatic head cancer. MS may be less costly overall. Abstract Background While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent type is unclear. We compared plastic stents (PS) and metal stents (MS) in these situations. Methods We retrospectively studied 43 patients who successfully underwent preoperative EBD prior to NACRT for pancreatic head cancer at a single institution. We divided patients into PS (n = 22) and MS (n = 21) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of re‐interventional drainage rate before surgery. Secondary outcomes were rates of EBD‐associated and postoperative complications and total costs in the pre‐ and perioperative periods. Results The re‐intervention rate was significantly greater in the PS group than in the MS group (95% vs 4.8%, respectively, P < 0.05). EBD‐associated and postoperative complications were significantly less common in the MS group ( P < 0.05). The average total preoperative medical costs were significantly lower in the MS group (PS vs MS: 528,597 vs 395,891 JPY, P = 0.004). Conclusions MS can be the first choice for EBD in patients undergoing NACRT for pancreatic head cancer. MS may be less costly overall. Background While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent type is unclear. We compared plastic stents (PS) and metal stents (MS) in these situations. Methods We retrospectively studied 43 patients who successfully underwent preoperative EBD prior to NACRT for pancreatic head cancer at a single institution. We divided patients into PS (n = 22) and MS (n = 21) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of re‐interventional drainage rate before surgery. Secondary outcomes were rates of EBD‐associated and postoperative complications and total costs in the pre‐ and perioperative periods. Results The re‐intervention rate was significantly greater in the PS group than in the MS group (95% vs 4.8%, respectively, P < 0.05). EBD‐associated and postoperative complications were significantly less common in the MS group (P < 0.05). The average total preoperative medical costs were significantly lower in the MS group (PS vs MS: 528,597 vs 395,891 JPY, P = 0.004). Conclusions MS can be the first choice for EBD in patients undergoing NACRT for pancreatic head cancer. MS may be less costly overall. Highlight Retrospectively comparing the efficacy and cost‐benefit of plastic stents versus metal stents in preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for pancreatic head cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, Kobayashi and colleagues concluded that metal stents can be the first choice. Metal stents were also found to be more cost‐beneficial in the preoperative period. While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is necessary for managing obstructive jaundice and cholangitis during the preoperative waiting period. Nevertheless, ideal choice of stent type is unclear. We compared plastic stents (PS) and metal stents (MS) in these situations. We retrospectively studied 43 patients who successfully underwent preoperative EBD prior to NACRT for pancreatic head cancer at a single institution. We divided patients into PS (n = 22) and MS (n = 21) groups. The primary outcome was the rate of re-interventional drainage rate before surgery. Secondary outcomes were rates of EBD-associated and postoperative complications and total costs in the pre- and perioperative periods. The re-intervention rate was significantly greater in the PS group than in the MS group (95% vs 4.8%, respectively, P < 0.05). EBD-associated and postoperative complications were significantly less common in the MS group (P < 0.05). The average total preoperative medical costs were significantly lower in the MS group (PS vs MS: 528,597 vs 395,891 JPY, P = 0.004). MS can be the first choice for EBD in patients undergoing NACRT for pancreatic head cancer. MS may be less costly overall. |
Author | Kobara, Hideki Yamana, Hiroki Namima, Daisuke Kobayashi, Kiyoyuki Masaki, Tsutomu Kohno, Toshiaki Fujita, Naoki Fujihara, Shintaro Kamada, Hideki Okano, Keiichi |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Kiyoyuki orcidid: 0000-0002-1793-1587 surname: Kobayashi fullname: Kobayashi, Kiyoyuki email: koba0415@med.kagawa-u.ac.jp organization: Kagawa University – sequence: 2 givenname: Hideki surname: Kobara fullname: Kobara, Hideki organization: Kagawa University – sequence: 3 givenname: Hideki orcidid: 0000-0002-0715-645X surname: Kamada fullname: Kamada, Hideki organization: Kagawa University – sequence: 4 givenname: Toshiaki surname: Kohno fullname: Kohno, Toshiaki organization: Kagawa University – sequence: 5 givenname: Daisuke surname: Namima fullname: Namima, Daisuke organization: Kagawa University – sequence: 6 givenname: Naoki surname: Fujita fullname: Fujita, Naoki organization: Kagawa University – sequence: 7 givenname: Hiroki surname: Yamana fullname: Yamana, Hiroki organization: Kagawa University – sequence: 8 givenname: Shintaro surname: Fujihara fullname: Fujihara, Shintaro organization: Kagawa University – sequence: 9 givenname: Keiichi surname: Okano fullname: Okano, Keiichi organization: Kagawa University – sequence: 10 givenname: Tsutomu surname: Masaki fullname: Masaki, Tsutomu organization: Kagawa University |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp1kc9u1DAQhy1UREupxBMgS1y4pPhfEvsIq0JBleAAZ2vWmRCvEjvYyVb7ELwzXnUpEhK-jD3-9Gns33NyFmJAQl5yds0ZE293w3a-NsI8IRdcN7pqjBZnj_tWnZOrnHesLMmlkewZOZeyUapgF-TXJk4zJJ9joLGn8wh58Y7mBcNC95jymumEC4ynlg90ThhnTLD4PdKtHz2kA-0S-AA_kPYx0RmCSwhH0YDQUVfOmOi9XwYaMEK3W_dQZG7AKSbofFyGIpwPL8jTHsaMV6d6Sb5_uPm2ua3uvnz8tHl3VznZSlMJIZmoG6G6tgGpGG-U04Y709eMNaDRmPJUbLEGJ6RxTgJq3HLOe1HuanlJ3jx45xR_rpgXO_nscByhjLdmK5RRWrfMqIK-_gfdxTWFMp0VtW5qw3kr_wpdijkn7O2c_FQ-xnJmjynZY0q2pFTQVyfhup2wewT_ZFKA6gG49yMe_iuyn2_ffz0KfwO3Fp9k |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1239 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12196245 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1090 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_1240 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12876_023_02874_5 crossref_primary_10_1002_deo2_263 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gie_2023_10_023 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_875504 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_023_14523_y |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.42031.x 10.1038/ajg.2013.93 10.1002/jhbp.640 10.1007/s00268-018-4820-6 10.1007/s00066-014-0737-7 10.1002/jhbp.631 10.21873/invivo.11700 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.006 10.1002/jhbp.609 10.1155/2016/7968201 10.1007/s00535-016-1217-x 10.1056/NEJMoa0903230 10.1002/jhbp.652 10.1002/jhbp.778 10.5009/gnl18573 10.1111/den.12049 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308762 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002705 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.044 10.1111/den.12894 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.012 10.1007/s00280-016-3199-z 10.1136/gut.46.5.725 10.1002/jhbp.671 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00127-3 10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816539 10.1055/s-2007-1010294 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.047 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92752-2 10.1002/cncr.26594 10.1002/jhbp.693 10.1245/s10434-017-5921-4 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. Copyright © 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery – notice: 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. – notice: Copyright © 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Surgery |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION K9. 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1002/jhbp.929 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
EISSN | 1868-6982 |
EndPage | 863 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1002_jhbp_929 33644982 JHBP929 |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -5E -5G -BR -Y2 0R~ 0VY 1OC 2JY 2~H 30V 33P 3SF 4.4 52U 52V 53G 5VS 8-1 8TC 8UJ 95. AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAIAL AANLZ AANXM AAONW AARHV AARTL AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCUV ABJNI ABJOX ABQWH ABTEG ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACBXY ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACOMO ACPOU ACREN ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADINQ ADIZJ ADKPE ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADQRH ADRFC ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGNC AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUYR AFBBN AFBPY AFEXP AFFPM AFGKR AFLOW AFPWT AFWTZ AGJBK AHBTC AHBYD AHKAY AHMBA AHSBF AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMKLP AMTXH AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BGNMA BHBCM BMXJE BRXPI C45 CSCUP DCZOG DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD EMOBN EN4 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S GODZA GQ6 GQ8 H.X HF~ HGLYW HMJXF HVGLF HZ~ IZIGR JBSCW KBYEO LATKE LEEKS LITHE LOXES LUTES LYRES M4Y MA- MEWTI MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM MY~ N2Q NF~ NU0 O66 O9- O93 O9I OVD P2W P9S PQQKQ Q.N QB0 QOS R89 ROL RSV S37 S3B SDE SMD SOJ SUPJJ SV3 SZN TEORI TSV TUC VC2 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WK8 WOHZO WVDHM WXSBR Z45 Z7U Z82 Z87 Z8V ~EX NPM AAYXX CITATION K9. 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3739-223025624d76a340164c891c9f5006a8e99313e7e5ac239cc3ae8eb111f2e9953 |
ISSN | 1868-6974 |
IngestDate | Fri Aug 16 02:08:36 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 17:26:38 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 02:01:57 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:25:31 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:59:09 EDT 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 10 |
Keywords | obstructive jaundice pancreatic neoplasms cholangitis neoadjuvant therapy stents |
Language | English |
License | 2021 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3739-223025624d76a340164c891c9f5006a8e99313e7e5ac239cc3ae8eb111f2e9953 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-0715-645X 0000-0002-1793-1587 |
PMID | 33644982 |
PQID | 2586591173 |
PQPubID | 2034613 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2494887094 proquest_journals_2586591173 crossref_primary_10_1002_jhbp_929 pubmed_primary_33644982 wiley_primary_10_1002_jhbp_929_JHBP929 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | October 2021 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2021 text: October 2021 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Japan |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Japan – name: Tokyo |
PublicationTitle | Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | 1993; 25 2010; 57 1992; 340 2013; 108 2015; 149 2019; 33 2000; 46 2004; 8 2017; 24 2018; 268 2010; 362 2020; 14 2016; 2016 1996; 201 2003; 196 2017; 52 2015; 191 2012; 3 2005; 100 2019; 43 2005; 9 2017; 79 2019; 26 2015; 65 2020; 27 2016; 84 2018; 30 2014; 6 2012; 118 e_1_2_6_32_1 e_1_2_6_10_1 e_1_2_6_31_1 Adams MA (e_1_2_6_30_1) 2012; 3 e_1_2_6_19_1 e_1_2_6_13_1 e_1_2_6_36_1 e_1_2_6_14_1 e_1_2_6_35_1 e_1_2_6_11_1 Lin SC (e_1_2_6_22_1) 2010; 57 e_1_2_6_34_1 e_1_2_6_12_1 e_1_2_6_33_1 e_1_2_6_17_1 e_1_2_6_18_1 e_1_2_6_15_1 e_1_2_6_16_1 e_1_2_6_21_1 e_1_2_6_20_1 e_1_2_6_9_1 e_1_2_6_8_1 e_1_2_6_5_1 e_1_2_6_4_1 e_1_2_6_7_1 e_1_2_6_6_1 e_1_2_6_25_1 e_1_2_6_24_1 e_1_2_6_3_1 e_1_2_6_23_1 e_1_2_6_2_1 e_1_2_6_29_1 e_1_2_6_28_1 e_1_2_6_27_1 e_1_2_6_26_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 100 start-page: 2056 year: 2005 end-page: 61 article-title: Use of expandable metallic stents in resectable pancreatic cancer publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – volume: 79 start-page: 37 year: 2017 end-page: 47 article-title: Survival impact of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S‐1 chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma with arterial contact publication-title: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol – volume: 26 start-page: 524 year: 2019 end-page: 33 article-title: Upfront pancreaticoduodenectomy in severely jaundiced patients: is it safe? publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci – volume: 108 start-page: 1168 year: 2013 end-page: 73 article-title: Biliary self‐expandable metal stents do not adversely affect pancreaticoduodenectomy publication-title: AM. J. Gastroenterol – volume: 362 start-page: 129 year: 2010 end-page: 37 article-title: Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 30 start-page: 90 year: 2018 end-page: 7 article-title: Influence of cholangitis after preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage on postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with middle and lower malignant biliary strictures publication-title: Dig Endosc – volume: 26 start-page: 341 year: 2019 end-page: 7 article-title: Preoperative course of patients undergoing endoscopic nasobiliary drainage during the management of resectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci – volume: 2016 start-page: 7968201 year: 2016 article-title: Preoperative biliary drainage of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery publication-title: Gastroenterol Res Pract – volume: 65 start-page: 1981 year: 2015 end-page: 7 article-title: Metal or plastic stents for preoperative biliary drainage in resectable pancreatic cancer publication-title: Gut – volume: 84 start-page: 460 year: 2016 end-page: 6 article-title: Cost‐effectiveness and clinical efficacy of biliary stents in patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 33 start-page: 2027 year: 2019 end-page: 35 article-title: Clinical significance of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus S‐1 for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma publication-title: Vivo – volume: 196 start-page: 859 year: 2003 end-page: 65 article-title: Factors influencing delayed gastric emptying after pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy publication-title: J Am Coll Surg – volume: 3 start-page: 309 year: 2012 end-page: 13 article-title: Self‐expanding metal stents (SEMS) provide superior outcomes compared to plastic stents for pancreatic cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy publication-title: J Gastrointest Oncol – volume: 26 start-page: 249 year: 2019 end-page: 69 article-title: Clinical practice guidelines for safe performance of endoscopic ultrasound/ultrasonography‐guided biliary drainage: 2018 publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci – volume: 43 start-page: 642 year: 2019 end-page: 8 article-title: A comparison between plastic and metallic biliary stent placement in patients receiving preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer publication-title: World J Surg – volume: 27 start-page: 149 year: 2020 end-page: 50 article-title: A novel integrated inside biliary stent and nasobiliary drainage catheter system for biliary drainage (with video) publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci – volume: 201 start-page: 167 year: 1996 end-page: 72 article-title: Common bile duct obstruction due to malignancy: treatment with plastic versus metal stents publication-title: Radiology – volume: 57 start-page: 698 year: 2010 end-page: 705 article-title: Adequate preoperative biliary drainage is determinative to decrease postoperative infectious complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy publication-title: Hepatogastroenterology – volume: 9 start-page: 1094 year: 2005 end-page: 104 article-title: Pancreaticoduodenectomy after placement of endobiliary metal stents publication-title: J Gatrointest Surg – volume: 46 start-page: 725 year: 2000 end-page: 31 article-title: Endotoxin, cytokines, and endotoxin binding proteins in obstructive jaundice and after preoperative biliary drainage publication-title: Gut – volume: 26 start-page: E3 year: 2019 end-page: E4 article-title: Novel fine gauge electrocautery dilator for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided hepaticogastrostomy (with video) publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci – volume: 268 start-page: 215 year: 2018 end-page: 22 article-title: Oncological benefits of neoadjuvant chemoradiation with gemcitabine versus upfront surgery in patients with borderline Resectable pancreatic Cancer: a prospective, randomized, open‐label, multicenter phase 2/3 trial publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 25 start-page: 207 year: 1993 end-page: 12 article-title: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of metal stents for malignant obstruction of the common bile duct publication-title: Endoscopy – volume: 14 start-page: 269 year: 2020 end-page: 73 article-title: Clinical outcomes of biliary drainage during a neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer: metal versus plastic stents publication-title: Gut Liv – volume: 6 start-page: 77 year: 2014 end-page: 86 article-title: Covered self‐expandable metal stent deployment promises safe neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer publication-title: Dig Endosc – volume: 118 start-page: 2813 year: 2012 end-page: 9 article-title: Real‐time detection of hepatic micrometastases from pancreatic cancer by intraoperative fluorescence imaging: preliminary results of a prospective study publication-title: Cancer – volume: 149 start-page: 130 year: 2015 end-page: 8 article-title: Cost efficacy of metal stents for palliation of extrahepatic bile duct obstruction in a randomized controlled trial publication-title: Gastroenterology – volume: 340 start-page: 1488 year: 1992 end-page: 92 article-title: Randomised trial of self‐expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction publication-title: Lancet – volume: 8 start-page: 951 year: 2004 end-page: 9 article-title: Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula publication-title: J Gastrointest Surg – volume: 191 start-page: 7 year: 2015 end-page: 16 article-title: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy with gemcitabine/cisplatin and surgery versus immediate surgery in resectable pancreatic cancer: results of the first prospective randomized phase II trial publication-title: Strahlenther Onkol – volume: 26 start-page: 449 year: 2019 end-page: 58 article-title: Optimal timing of pancreaticoduodenectomy following preoperative biliary drainage considering major morbidity and postoperative survival publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci – volume: 52 start-page: 81 year: 2017 end-page: 93 article-title: Clinical benefits of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: an observational study using inverse probability of treatment weighting publication-title: J Gastroenterol – volume: 24 start-page: 2777 year: 2017 end-page: 84 article-title: A prospective phase II trial of neoadjuvant S‐1 with concurrent hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol – volume: 27 start-page: 851 year: 2020 end-page: 9 article-title: Risk factors for dysfunction of preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage for malignant hilar biliary obstruction publication-title: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci – ident: e_1_2_6_29_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.42031.x – ident: e_1_2_6_31_1 doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.93 – ident: e_1_2_6_18_1 doi: 10.1002/jhbp.640 – ident: e_1_2_6_8_1 doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4820-6 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_1 doi: 10.1007/s00066-014-0737-7 – ident: e_1_2_6_35_1 doi: 10.1002/jhbp.631 – ident: e_1_2_6_24_1 doi: 10.21873/invivo.11700 – ident: e_1_2_6_28_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.006 – ident: e_1_2_6_36_1 doi: 10.1002/jhbp.609 – ident: e_1_2_6_6_1 doi: 10.1155/2016/7968201 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_1 doi: 10.1007/s00535-016-1217-x – volume: 3 start-page: 309 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_6_30_1 article-title: Self‐expanding metal stents (SEMS) provide superior outcomes compared to plastic stents for pancreatic cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy publication-title: J Gastrointest Oncol contributor: fullname: Adams MA – ident: e_1_2_6_2_1 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903230 – ident: e_1_2_6_25_1 doi: 10.1002/jhbp.652 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_1 doi: 10.1002/jhbp.778 – ident: e_1_2_6_7_1 doi: 10.5009/gnl18573 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_1 doi: 10.1111/den.12049 – ident: e_1_2_6_5_1 doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308762 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_1 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002705 – ident: e_1_2_6_32_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.09.044 – ident: e_1_2_6_20_1 doi: 10.1111/den.12894 – ident: e_1_2_6_34_1 doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.012 – ident: e_1_2_6_15_1 doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3199-z – ident: e_1_2_6_21_1 doi: 10.1136/gut.46.5.725 – volume: 57 start-page: 698 year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_6_22_1 article-title: Adequate preoperative biliary drainage is determinative to decrease postoperative infectious complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy publication-title: Hepatogastroenterology contributor: fullname: Lin SC – ident: e_1_2_6_19_1 doi: 10.1002/jhbp.671 – ident: e_1_2_6_33_1 doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00127-3 – ident: e_1_2_6_3_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_27_1 doi: 10.1148/radiology.201.1.8816539 – ident: e_1_2_6_26_1 doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1010294 – ident: e_1_2_6_23_1 doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.047 – ident: e_1_2_6_4_1 doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92752-2 – ident: e_1_2_6_11_1 doi: 10.1002/cncr.26594 – ident: e_1_2_6_16_1 doi: 10.1002/jhbp.693 – ident: e_1_2_6_10_1 doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5921-4 |
SSID | ssj0000313930 |
Score | 2.4092844 |
Snippet | Background
While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage... While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD) is... Abstract Background While neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary... BackgroundWhile neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD)... BACKGROUNDWhile neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for pancreatic head cancer are effective, preoperative endoscopic biliary drainage (EBD)... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed wiley |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 856 |
SubjectTerms | Chemotherapy cholangitis neoadjuvant therapy obstructive jaundice Pancreatic cancer pancreatic neoplasms Radiation therapy Stents |
Title | Comparison of plastic stent versus metal stent in preoperative biliary drainage for pancreatic head cancer with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy |
URI | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fjhbp.929 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33644982 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2586591173 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2494887094 |
Volume | 28 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3NjtMwELbK7oULAvFXWJCREJcqpYmT1DluV1tVq6VwaKXeIid21SzapOomh_IOPCBvw0zspI66oIVLWo0rO_V8mfnsjGcI-egmXILjCBwlhXB8GYQOuBEXHjyVgjuUSaBwofhlHs6W_tUqWPV6v6yopapMhumPe8-V_I9WQQZ6xVOy_6DZtlMQwHfQL1xBw3B9kI4v7CKCWBAaky4PQG95OcBwi-oOK0TXJ0JQhAHjO1Vslcn2jXGxGDQnsUwExu5gyCFYB00k69zXEqPCUrXT-7W5KoS8qYB8lwNQ9i3AR2bmCFfn9bBFczfg78rCMWM5VvfG-R7eJoFp2WNtp9r4ZPtiX33P7Ma6JNJglkllycWtkPfJi01dVHywKKBHYRrM9obntoFyDzWilvHmIXfCSFf9GSpbxjsW3-M2skeW_eZBaFMBbXuPvIzOWnuzSbbDyOzXdBJ5z7_G0-X1dby4XC0ekVMPbCAY39Pz6WQybzcAMWlmVNfCae-7SY488j43nXfp0tEaqLukqjnR4il5YrRMzzUyn5Geyp-TnwdU0mJNDSppDUGqUUlrVBpRllMbldQghTaopIBKeoANRVRSjUqKqKQWKukRKl-Q5fRycTFzTNEPJ2VjFjlAV5GGe74ch4L5mAEu5ZGbRusAHITgCiyIy9RYBSL1WJSmTCgOhMN11x60BewlOcmLXL0mNPHXAoviRmPu-0C8-UgxIVwRpknIknDUJx-auY23OrdLrLN4ezHOfwzz3ydnzaTH5sm_i72AhwGwhDGDLtpmsMv4sk3Av67gN5h3CZxh5PfJK62sdhDGYBUCmOyTT7X2_jh6fDWbfIPPN3-_i7fk8eHROSMn5a5S74Arl8l7g7rfyzPLOw |
link.rule.ids | 315,783,787,27936,27937 |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison+of+plastic+stent+versus+metal+stent+in+preoperative+biliary+drainage+for+pancreatic+head+cancer+with+neoadjuvant+chemoradiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+hepato-biliary-pancreatic+sciences&rft.au=Kobayashi%2C+Kiyoyuki&rft.au=Kobara%2C+Hideki&rft.au=Kamada%2C+Hideki&rft.au=Kohno%2C+Toshiaki&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc&rft.issn=1868-6974&rft.eissn=1868-6982&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=856&rft.epage=863&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fjhbp.929&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1868-6974&client=summon |