A retrospective observational study of telehealth utilisation for mental health consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australian general practice

Objectives and importance of study: Despite the abundance of mental health research during the pandemic, there is limited evidence exploring mental health presentations to Australian general practice. This study examined the utilisation of telehealth for mental health consultations in Australian gen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPublic Health Research & Practice Vol. 33; no. 3
Main Authors Thomas, Judith, Sezgin, Gorkem, McGuire, Precious, Hardie, Rae-anne, Franco, Guilherme, Williamson, Margaret, Georgiou, Andrew
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sax Institute 01.09.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objectives and importance of study: Despite the abundance of mental health research during the pandemic, there is limited evidence exploring mental health presentations to Australian general practice. This study examined the utilisation of telehealth for mental health consultations in Australian general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were to: 1) determine the proportion of mental health services delivered via telehealth between March 2020 and November 2021; 2) determine the types of mental health consultations most frequently delivered via telehealth; and 3) model the sociodemographic characteristics of patients using telehealth mental health consultations, including consultation type.Objectives and importance of study: Despite the abundance of mental health research during the pandemic, there is limited evidence exploring mental health presentations to Australian general practice. This study examined the utilisation of telehealth for mental health consultations in Australian general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were to: 1) determine the proportion of mental health services delivered via telehealth between March 2020 and November 2021; 2) determine the types of mental health consultations most frequently delivered via telehealth; and 3) model the sociodemographic characteristics of patients using telehealth mental health consultations, including consultation type.Retrospective observational study.STUDY TYPERetrospective observational study.We used Medicare Benefits Schedule service item numbers to distinguish mental health consultations in de-identified electronic general practice data. We stratified the proportions of face-to-face, video, and telephone mental health consultations by state and consultation type. We used two mixed-effects logistic models to assess the variation in the likelihood of i) a telehealth (video/telephone) compared to a face-to-face consultation and ii) a video compared to telephone consultation; by sociodemographic characteristics.METHODSWe used Medicare Benefits Schedule service item numbers to distinguish mental health consultations in de-identified electronic general practice data. We stratified the proportions of face-to-face, video, and telephone mental health consultations by state and consultation type. We used two mixed-effects logistic models to assess the variation in the likelihood of i) a telehealth (video/telephone) compared to a face-to-face consultation and ii) a video compared to telephone consultation; by sociodemographic characteristics.The study comprised 874 249 mental health consultations. Telehealth use peaked in Victoria (61.6%) during July 2020 and in NSW during August 2021 (52.5%). Telehealth use continued throughout 2021 with an increase in video consultations from July 2021 onwards in both states. Proportions of mental health treatment plan consultations via telephone decreased from July 2021 with a concomitant increase in video. Telehealth was more likely to be used by females, in Victoria, in regional/remote regions and during 2020. Video was more likely to be used than telephone for mental health treatment plans/reviews compared with mental health consultations. Compared with people aged 25-29, video was most likely to be used by ages 20-24 and least by those aged 80 and over. There was no evidence for sex differences when comparing telephone and video.RESULTSThe study comprised 874 249 mental health consultations. Telehealth use peaked in Victoria (61.6%) during July 2020 and in NSW during August 2021 (52.5%). Telehealth use continued throughout 2021 with an increase in video consultations from July 2021 onwards in both states. Proportions of mental health treatment plan consultations via telephone decreased from July 2021 with a concomitant increase in video. Telehealth was more likely to be used by females, in Victoria, in regional/remote regions and during 2020. Video was more likely to be used than telephone for mental health treatment plans/reviews compared with mental health consultations. Compared with people aged 25-29, video was most likely to be used by ages 20-24 and least by those aged 80 and over. There was no evidence for sex differences when comparing telephone and video.This study presents a comprehensive understanding of the important role telehealth played in the delivery of mental health consultations during the first 21 months of the pandemic, including sociodemographics of patients utilising telehealth. The findings can assist general practices with future planning for the delivery of mental health services via telehealth.CONCLUSIONSThis study presents a comprehensive understanding of the important role telehealth played in the delivery of mental health consultations during the first 21 months of the pandemic, including sociodemographics of patients utilising telehealth. The findings can assist general practices with future planning for the delivery of mental health services via telehealth.
AbstractList Objectives and importance of study: Despite the abundance of mental health research during the pandemic, there is limited evidence exploring mental health presentations to Australian general practice. This study examined the utilisation of telehealth for mental health consultations in Australian general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were to: 1) determine the proportion of mental health services delivered via telehealth between March 2020 and November 2021; 2) determine the types of mental health consultations most frequently delivered via telehealth; and 3) model the sociodemographic characteristics of patients using telehealth mental health consultations, including consultation type.Objectives and importance of study: Despite the abundance of mental health research during the pandemic, there is limited evidence exploring mental health presentations to Australian general practice. This study examined the utilisation of telehealth for mental health consultations in Australian general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were to: 1) determine the proportion of mental health services delivered via telehealth between March 2020 and November 2021; 2) determine the types of mental health consultations most frequently delivered via telehealth; and 3) model the sociodemographic characteristics of patients using telehealth mental health consultations, including consultation type.Retrospective observational study.STUDY TYPERetrospective observational study.We used Medicare Benefits Schedule service item numbers to distinguish mental health consultations in de-identified electronic general practice data. We stratified the proportions of face-to-face, video, and telephone mental health consultations by state and consultation type. We used two mixed-effects logistic models to assess the variation in the likelihood of i) a telehealth (video/telephone) compared to a face-to-face consultation and ii) a video compared to telephone consultation; by sociodemographic characteristics.METHODSWe used Medicare Benefits Schedule service item numbers to distinguish mental health consultations in de-identified electronic general practice data. We stratified the proportions of face-to-face, video, and telephone mental health consultations by state and consultation type. We used two mixed-effects logistic models to assess the variation in the likelihood of i) a telehealth (video/telephone) compared to a face-to-face consultation and ii) a video compared to telephone consultation; by sociodemographic characteristics.The study comprised 874 249 mental health consultations. Telehealth use peaked in Victoria (61.6%) during July 2020 and in NSW during August 2021 (52.5%). Telehealth use continued throughout 2021 with an increase in video consultations from July 2021 onwards in both states. Proportions of mental health treatment plan consultations via telephone decreased from July 2021 with a concomitant increase in video. Telehealth was more likely to be used by females, in Victoria, in regional/remote regions and during 2020. Video was more likely to be used than telephone for mental health treatment plans/reviews compared with mental health consultations. Compared with people aged 25-29, video was most likely to be used by ages 20-24 and least by those aged 80 and over. There was no evidence for sex differences when comparing telephone and video.RESULTSThe study comprised 874 249 mental health consultations. Telehealth use peaked in Victoria (61.6%) during July 2020 and in NSW during August 2021 (52.5%). Telehealth use continued throughout 2021 with an increase in video consultations from July 2021 onwards in both states. Proportions of mental health treatment plan consultations via telephone decreased from July 2021 with a concomitant increase in video. Telehealth was more likely to be used by females, in Victoria, in regional/remote regions and during 2020. Video was more likely to be used than telephone for mental health treatment plans/reviews compared with mental health consultations. Compared with people aged 25-29, video was most likely to be used by ages 20-24 and least by those aged 80 and over. There was no evidence for sex differences when comparing telephone and video.This study presents a comprehensive understanding of the important role telehealth played in the delivery of mental health consultations during the first 21 months of the pandemic, including sociodemographics of patients utilising telehealth. The findings can assist general practices with future planning for the delivery of mental health services via telehealth.CONCLUSIONSThis study presents a comprehensive understanding of the important role telehealth played in the delivery of mental health consultations during the first 21 months of the pandemic, including sociodemographics of patients utilising telehealth. The findings can assist general practices with future planning for the delivery of mental health services via telehealth.
Objectives and importance of study: Despite the abundance of mental health research during the pandemic, there is limited evidence exploring mental health presentations to Australian general practice. This study examined the utilisation of telehealth for mental health consultations in Australian general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were to: 1) determine the proportion of mental health services delivered via telehealth between March 2020 and November 2021; 2) determine the types of mental health consultations most frequently delivered via telehealth; and 3) model the sociodemographic characteristics of patients using telehealth mental health consultations, including consultation type. Study type: Retrospective observational study. Methods: We used Medicare Benefits Schedule service item numbers to distinguish mental health consultations in de-identified electronic general practice data. We stratified the proportions of face-to-face, video, and telephone mental health consultations by state and consultation type. We used two mixed-effects logistic models to assess the variation in the likelihood of i) a telehealth (video/telephone) compared to a face-to-face consultation and ii) a video compared to telephone consultation; by sociodemographic characteristics. Results: The study comprised 874 249 mental health consultations. Telehealth use peaked in Victoria (61.6%) during July 2020 and in NSW during August 2021 (52.5%). Telehealth use continued throughout 2021 with an increase in video consultations from July 2021 onwards in both states. Proportions of mental health treatment plan consultations via telephone decreased from July 2021 with a concomitant increase in video. Telehealth was more likely to be used by females, in Victoria, in regional/remote regions and during 2020. Video was more likely to be used than telephone for mental health treatment plans/reviews compared with mental health consultations. Compared with people aged 25–29, video was most likely to be used by ages 20–24 and least by those aged 80 and over. There was no evidence for sex differences when comparing telephone and video. Conclusions: This study presents a comprehensive understanding of the important role telehealth played in the delivery of mental health consultations during the first 21 months of the pandemic, including sociodemographics of patients utilising telehealth. The findings can assist general practices with future planning for the delivery of mental health services via telehealth.
Author Sezgin, Gorkem
Thomas, Judith
Williamson, Margaret
Hardie, Rae-anne
McGuire, Precious
Georgiou, Andrew
Franco, Guilherme
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Judith
  surname: Thomas
  fullname: Thomas, Judith
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Gorkem
  surname: Sezgin
  fullname: Sezgin, Gorkem
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Precious
  surname: McGuire
  fullname: McGuire, Precious
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Rae-anne
  surname: Hardie
  fullname: Hardie, Rae-anne
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Guilherme
  surname: Franco
  fullname: Franco, Guilherme
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Margaret
  surname: Williamson
  fullname: Williamson, Margaret
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Andrew
  surname: Georgiou
  fullname: Georgiou, Andrew
BookMark eNptkctuHCEQRVHkSHEc7_IBLLNIJzy6aViOJq-RLHmTZIswFDNYDHSAtuRPyd8GzViRFWVFqe7hVunWa3SRcgKE3lLygc5E0I_LoSycc8YZe4EuGSPjwIiiF8_qV-i61ntCCBVMCMUv0e8NLtBKrgvYFh4A57sK5cG0kJOJuLbVPeLscYMIBzCxHfDaQgz1RGCfCz5Cah19Um1OdY3tJFfs1hLSHrcD4O3tz92ngSq8mOTgGCwOCW_W2oqJwSS8hwS9xEsxfRMLb9BLb2KF66f3Cv348vn79ttwc_t1t93cDJbPrA3CT0xJP09KcQcCZuL86KnwUo2Kj5xP1AgHjFBmu0wn6ybaid6kEhznV2h39nXZ3OulhKMpjzqboE-NXPbalL5QBG2k4krdKS45jLOUZhqJEfMkrKQeZt-93p29lpJ_rVCbPoZqIUaTIK9VMylGQRWZRUffn1Hbw68F_N_RlOjTQfWzg3ac_YPbcA655xfi_z_9AfwyqK8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_hcs2_112
crossref_primary_10_1080_10503307_2023_2292743
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
DOA
DOI 10.17061/phrp3332322
DatabaseName CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
EISSN 2204-2091
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_a89399b9383e4788a540a6756c81fe7f
10_17061_phrp3332322
GroupedDBID 44B
5VS
AAYXX
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
CITATION
EMOBN
GROUPED_DOAJ
KQ8
M~E
OK1
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-6f5298f75993de6e70df4f16f8949343351a6de2012ce6e15cd51f4fa6d18ed33
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2204-2091
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:01:58 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 06:37:17 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:07:52 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:04:33 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c372t-6f5298f75993de6e70df4f16f8949343351a6de2012ce6e15cd51f4fa6d18ed33
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/a89399b9383e4788a540a6756c81fe7f
PQID 2864619076
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a89399b9383e4788a540a6756c81fe7f
proquest_miscellaneous_2864619076
crossref_primary_10_17061_phrp3332322
crossref_citationtrail_10_17061_phrp3332322
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationTitle Public Health Research & Practice
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher Sax Institute
Publisher_xml – name: Sax Institute
SSID ssj0001626693
Score 2.30199
Snippet Objectives and importance of study: Despite the abundance of mental health research during the pandemic, there is limited evidence exploring mental health...
SourceID doaj
proquest
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
SubjectTerms telehealth
Title A retrospective observational study of telehealth utilisation for mental health consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australian general practice
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2864619076
https://doaj.org/article/a89399b9383e4788a540a6756c81fe7f
Volume 33
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LS8QwEA7iSRDxieuLEfQkxaZJ0-Soq6KCenHFW0mbRIS1XXbrj_HfOmm664qIF6_JlJbMNPNlMvMNIUexQ5SvTRpppmTEC2WjIslclDBjuCxk4trQxd29uB7w2-f0ea7Vl88JC_TAYeFONTpUpQqFJynrqd41QgyNKFeUkjqbOb_7os-bO0y10RXE6UKxLtM9Q6d1imszYowhgki--aCWqv_HTty6l6tVstLhQjgL37NGFmy1TpZDUA1CrdAG-TiDsW3G9bQ8EupiFlTFh1uqWKgdNOhLQoEjoF0Nu4wdQHwKgcsfutnSF2AOw238BELJIiAkhP7D081FRBWMfJD5Db_htYKvuAi8BLZqmBZZbZLB1eVj_zrqeitEJcuSJhIuTZR0WYr4xFhhs9g47qhwUnHFOGMp1cJYhAdJidM0LU1KUQIHqbSGsS2yWNWV3SbArGA6NtLZmHMtqS6UNNzQONbc4D7cIyfT1c7Ljnjc978Y5v4A4nWTz-mmR45n0qNAuPGL3LlX3EzG02S3A2g8eWc8-V_G0yOHU7Xn-Fv5uxJd2fp9kidScDxbxpnY-Y8X7ZIl36c-JKftkcVm_G73Ec00xUFruJ80MPTx
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A+retrospective+observational+study+of+telehealth+utilisation+for+mental+health+consultations+during+the+COVID-19+pandemic+in+Australian+general+practice&rft.jtitle=Public+Health+Research+%26+Practice&rft.au=Thomas%2C+Judith&rft.au=Sezgin%2C+Gorkem&rft.au=McGuire%2C+Precious&rft.au=Hardie%2C+Rae-anne&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.issn=2204-2091&rft.eissn=2204-2091&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft_id=info:doi/10.17061%2Fphrp3332322&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_17061_phrp3332322
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2204-2091&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2204-2091&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2204-2091&client=summon