Value modelling for multi-stakeholder and multi-objective optimisation in engineering design
The work presented culminates in the development of a value model used in the conceptual phase of engineering design, with the preferences of more than one stakeholder addressed in the multi-stakeholder and multi-objective optimisation. The 'value' of proposed solutions is assessed in an o...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of engineering design Vol. 27; no. 10; pp. 697 - 724 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Abingdon
Taylor & Francis
02.10.2016
Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The work presented culminates in the development of a value model used in the conceptual phase of engineering design, with the preferences of more than one stakeholder addressed in the multi-stakeholder and multi-objective optimisation. The 'value' of proposed solutions is assessed in an objective way from both performance and economic perspectives, while the optimal solution is identified based on the needs of the user and manufacturer, as major stakeholders. This novel value model for consistent value assessment synthesises the multi-attribute value/utility analysis with Game Theory and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) assessment methodologies. During the multi-criteria decision analysis, the deficiencies, introduced by the arbitrary numerical scales used in the AHP to convert the linguistic preferences of the user between the various attributes to numerical values, are resolved. The preferences of a group of experts/decision-makers are synthesised in the group value model through the extraction of weighting factors from the individuals' AHP pairwise comparison matrices. Moreover, Game Theory is used in a hybrid cooperative/bargaining, non-cooperative non-zero sum game between the stakeholders as players, identifying the optimal design through the simultaneous employment of the Nash bargaining solution and the Nash equilibrium. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The work presented culminates in the development of a value model used in the conceptual phase of engineering design, with the preferences of more than one stakeholder addressed in the multi-stakeholder and multi-objective optimisation. The 'value' of proposed solutions is assessed in an objective way from both performance and economic perspectives, while the optimal solution is identified based on the needs of the user and manufacturer, as major stakeholders. This novel value model for consistent value assessment synthesises the multi-attribute value/utility analysis with Game Theory and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) assessment methodologies. During the multi-criteria decision analysis, the deficiencies, introduced by the arbitrary numerical scales used in the AHP to convert the linguistic preferences of the user between the various attributes to numerical values, are resolved. The preferences of a group of experts/decision-makers are synthesised in the group value model through the extraction of weighting factors from the individuals' AHP pairwise comparison matrices. Moreover, Game Theory is used in a hybrid cooperative/bargaining, non-cooperative non-zero sum game between the stakeholders as players, identifying the optimal design through the simultaneous employment of the Nash bargaining solution and the Nash equilibrium. |
Author | Eres, Murat Hakki Scanlan, James Papageorgiou, Evangelos |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Evangelos orcidid: 0000-0003-3337-911X surname: Papageorgiou fullname: Papageorgiou, Evangelos email: ecpapage@gmail.com organization: Computational Engineering and Design Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton – sequence: 2 givenname: Murat Hakki surname: Eres fullname: Eres, Murat Hakki organization: Computational Engineering and Design Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton – sequence: 3 givenname: James surname: Scanlan fullname: Scanlan, James organization: Computational Engineering and Design Research Group, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton |
BookMark | eNqFkU9LHDEYh0NR6Kr9CIWBXnqZNX9mNgm9VEStIPRSeyqEZOadbbaZZE0yit_eTHe97EFPL4Tn-fG-v5ygIx88IPSZ4CXBAp9j2TaNoGJJMVktCSXNSrIPaFHmqiaC8SO0mJl6hj6ik5Q2GBeRtgv057d2E1Rj6ME569fVEGI1Ti7bOmX9D_4G10OstO_3r8FsoMv2EaqwzXa0SWcbfGV9BX5tPUCcU3pIdu3P0PGgXYJP-3mK7q-vfl3-qO9-3txeXtzVHeMk17w1QpBGG-CSDbJtMcgVbbBm1HAhMZdD25heSCI6oXkHBnMwlJm2l4YSzE7R113uNoaHCVJWZa-uHKQ9hCkpIiQrNpO8oF8O0E2Yoi_bFYoy2jDCZurbjupiSCnCoDqb_x-ao7ZOEazm5tVr82puXu2bL3Z7YG-jHXV8ftf7vvOsL78w6qcQXa-yfnYhDlH7zibF3o54ASd6nHI |
CODEN | JEDSEW |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4064694 crossref_primary_10_1080_09544828_2020_1871470 crossref_primary_10_1017_dsi_2019_247 crossref_primary_10_1002_j_2334_5837_2018_00466_x crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4049315 crossref_primary_10_1080_09544828_2021_1880557 crossref_primary_10_1002_inst_12215 crossref_primary_10_1080_09544828_2021_1915966 crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4048115 crossref_primary_10_18698_0536_1044_2019_8_34_44 crossref_primary_10_1080_09544828_2024_2335137 crossref_primary_10_3103_S1068798X24701557 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00158_020_02836_5 crossref_primary_10_1109_EMR_2020_2985373 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cie_2019_106122 crossref_primary_10_1017_dsj_2019_23 crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_cs_2195 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.09.006 10.1007/s00170-003-1891-8 10.1016/j.omega.2013.07.003 10.2514/1.12594 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.016 10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.12.006 10.1002/dac.1305 10.1016/j.ress.2010.02.013 10.1287/inte.1050.0152 10.1007/s10845-011-0606-5 10.1007/s10726-005-7443-x 10.1287/opre.27.4.810 10.1016/S0899-8256(05)80018-1 10.1016/j.anucene.2008.11.034 10.1287/mnsc.47.6.800.9812 10.1007/BF00134132 10.1080/03052150902822141 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.055 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00226-0 10.1006/obhd.1993.1019 10.1109/90.879352 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.03.007 10.1080/03052150701515037 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.043 10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<309::AID-MCDA163>3.0.CO;2-2 10.4135/9781412985161 10.1016/S0306-4549(00)00076-1 10.1287/mnsc.41.6.1091 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.10.010 10.1108/01443570710830629 10.1287/mnsc.36.3.249 10.1002/nme.1093 10.1007/s10589-011-9395-1 10.1108/09699981011038079 10.1007/s10100-011-0212-9 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00084-4 10.4324/9780203489291 10.2307/j.ctv322v4g7 10.1049/iet-com.2010.0304 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.047 10.1016/S1000-9361(09)60204-1 10.1287/mnsc.18.5.80 10.1007/s00163-005-0007-x 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.022 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.06.006 10.2514/1.C000311 10.21236/AD0708563 10.1006/obhd.1998.2791 10.2307/1907266 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.026 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00467-1 10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00032-9 10.1006/obhd.1994.1087 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000324 10.1080/03052150902890064 10.1016/j.tust.2013.02.004 10.1080/09544828.2014.903387 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2016 – notice: 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 7TB 8FD FR3 |
DOI | 10.1080/09544828.2016.1214693 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Technology Research Database Engineering Research Database |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Technology Research Database Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Engineering Research Database |
DatabaseTitleList | Technology Research Database Technology Research Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Engineering Economics |
EISSN | 1466-1837 |
EndPage | 724 |
ExternalDocumentID | 4194654961 10_1080_09544828_2016_1214693 1214693 |
Genre | Article Feature |
GroupedDBID | -~X .7F .QJ 0BK 0R~ 29K 2DF 30N 4.4 5GY 5VS 8VB AAENE AAJMT AALDU AAMIU AAPUL AAQRR ABCCY ABDBF ABFIM ABHAV ABLIJ ABPAQ ABPEM ABTAI ABXUL ABXYU ACGEJ ACGFO ACGFS ACGOD ACIWK ACTIO ACUHS ADCVX ADGTB ADXPE AEGXH AEISY AEMOZ AENEX AEOZL AEPSL AEYOC AFKVX AGDLA AGMYJ AHDZW AHQJS AIAGR AIJEM AJWEG AKBVH AKOOK AKVCP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALQZU AQRUH AVBZW AWYRJ BLEHA CCCUG CE4 CS3 D-I DGEBU DKSSO DU5 EAP EAS EBE EBR EBS EBU EJD EMI EMK EPL EST ESX E~A E~B GTTXZ H13 HF~ HZ~ H~P I-F IPNFZ J.P K1G KYCEM M4Z MK~ NA5 NX~ O9- P2P QWB RIG RNANH ROSJB RTWRZ S-T SNACF TBQAZ TDBHL TEN TFL TFT TFW TH9 TNC TTHFI TUROJ TUS TWF UT5 UU3 ZGOLN ZL0 ~S~ AAGDL AAHIA AAYXX ABJNI ADMLS ADYSH AFRVT AIYEW AMPGV CITATION 7TB 8FD FR3 TASJS |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-75b8814abe793f9550e96240a32b789079f54bd8918c8a7ceb07eb23b5d9b2103 |
ISSN | 0954-4828 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 03:07:55 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 13 06:10:47 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:27:46 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:00:26 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 25 09:04:36 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 10 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c371t-75b8814abe793f9550e96240a32b789079f54bd8918c8a7ceb07eb23b5d9b2103 |
Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-3337-911X |
PQID | 1823243137 |
PQPubID | 33068 |
PageCount | 28 |
ParticipantIDs | informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_09544828_2016_1214693 proquest_journals_1823243137 proquest_miscellaneous_1893891397 crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_09544828_2016_1214693 crossref_primary_10_1080_09544828_2016_1214693 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-10-02 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-10-02 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2016 text: 2016-10-02 day: 02 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Abingdon |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Abingdon |
PublicationTitle | Journal of engineering design |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Taylor & Francis Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: Taylor & Francis – name: Taylor & Francis Ltd |
References | CIT0072 CIT0071 Von Neumann J. (CIT0069) 1953 CIT0073 Dyer R. F. (CIT0019) 1992; 52 CIT0032 Arrow K. J. (CIT0004) 1963 CIT0031 CIT0034 CIT0033 Fishburn P. C. (CIT0026) 1970 Hargreaves Heap S. P. (CIT0030) 2004 Edwards W. (CIT0021) 2009 CIT0070 CIT0035 CIT0037 CIT0041 CIT0040 CIT0043 CIT0042 CIT0001 CIT0045 Saaty T. L. (CIT0058) 2000 CIT0003 CIT0047 CIT0046 CIT0005 CIT0048 CIT0007 CIT0006 CIT0009 CIT0008 CIT0052 CIT0051 CIT0010 CIT0056 CIT0011 CIT0055 Keeney R. L. (CIT0038) 1996 CIT0014 CIT0013 CIT0016 CIT0015 CIT0059 CIT0018 CIT0017 Keeney R. L. (CIT0039) 1976 CIT0061 CIT0060 CIT0063 CIT0062 CIT0065 CIT0020 CIT0064 CIT0023 CIT0067 CIT0022 CIT0066 Alexander A. J. (CIT0002) 1988 Saaty T. L. (CIT0057) 1980 Ross A. M. (CIT0054) 2010 CIT0025 CIT0024 CIT0068 CIT0027 CIT0029 Roozenburg N. F. M. (CIT0053) 1995 CIT0028 |
References_xml | – volume-title: The Analytic Hierarch Process year: 1980 ident: CIT0057 – ident: CIT0006 doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.09.006 – ident: CIT0064 doi: 10.1007/s00170-003-1891-8 – ident: CIT0025 doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2013.07.003 – volume-title: Social Choice and Individual Values year: 1963 ident: CIT0004 – volume-title: How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decision Making year: 2009 ident: CIT0021 – ident: CIT0017 doi: 10.2514/1.12594 – volume-title: Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods year: 1995 ident: CIT0053 – ident: CIT0068 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.016 – ident: CIT0009 doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.12.006 – ident: CIT0045 doi: 10.1002/dac.1305 – ident: CIT0023 doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.02.013 – ident: CIT0027 doi: 10.1287/inte.1050.0152 – ident: CIT0067 doi: 10.1007/s10845-011-0606-5 – ident: CIT0046 doi: 10.1007/s10726-005-7443-x – ident: CIT0020 doi: 10.1287/opre.27.4.810 – ident: CIT0031 doi: 10.1016/S0899-8256(05)80018-1 – ident: CIT0040 doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2008.11.034 – ident: CIT0008 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.47.6.800.9812 – ident: CIT0055 doi: 10.1007/BF00134132 – ident: CIT0003 doi: 10.1080/03052150902822141 – ident: CIT0062 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.055 – ident: CIT0035 doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00226-0 – volume-title: Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with the Analytic Hierarchy Process year: 2000 ident: CIT0058 – ident: CIT0041 doi: 10.1006/obhd.1993.1019 – ident: CIT0072 doi: 10.1109/90.879352 – ident: CIT0043 doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.03.007 – ident: CIT0028 doi: 10.1080/03052150701515037 – ident: CIT0034 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.02.043 – volume-title: Decisions with Multiple Objectives year: 1976 ident: CIT0039 – ident: CIT0059 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1 – ident: CIT0060 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<309::AID-MCDA163>3.0.CO;2-2 – ident: CIT0073 doi: 10.4135/9781412985161 – ident: CIT0065 doi: 10.1016/S0306-4549(00)00076-1 – ident: CIT0051 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.41.6.1091 – volume-title: Aligning Perspectives and Methods for Value-Driven Design. AIAA Space. year: 2010 ident: CIT0054 – ident: CIT0005 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.10.010 – ident: CIT0011 doi: 10.1108/01443570710830629 – ident: CIT0018 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.36.3.249 – volume-title: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior year: 1953 ident: CIT0069 – ident: CIT0029 doi: 10.1002/nme.1093 – ident: CIT0015 doi: 10.1007/s10589-011-9395-1 – ident: CIT0001 doi: 10.1108/09699981011038079 – ident: CIT0016 doi: 10.1007/s10100-011-0212-9 – volume-title: The Cost and Benefits of Reliability in Military Equipment year: 1988 ident: CIT0002 – ident: CIT0042 doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00084-4 – volume-title: Game Theory: A Critical Text year: 2004 ident: CIT0030 doi: 10.4324/9780203489291 – volume-title: Value-focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making year: 1996 ident: CIT0038 doi: 10.2307/j.ctv322v4g7 – ident: CIT0037 doi: 10.1049/iet-com.2010.0304 – ident: CIT0070 doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.09.047 – ident: CIT0056 doi: 10.1016/S1000-9361(09)60204-1 – volume: 52 start-page: 237 issue: 2 year: 1992 ident: CIT0019 publication-title: Decision Support Systems – ident: CIT0032 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.18.5.80 – ident: CIT0071 doi: 10.1007/s00163-005-0007-x – ident: CIT0014 doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.022 – ident: CIT0063 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.06.006 – ident: CIT0013 doi: 10.2514/1.C000311 – volume-title: Utility Theory for Decision Making year: 1970 ident: CIT0026 doi: 10.21236/AD0708563 – ident: CIT0047 doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2791 – ident: CIT0048 doi: 10.2307/1907266 – ident: CIT0061 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.026 – ident: CIT0052 doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00467-1 – ident: CIT0010 doi: 10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00032-9 – ident: CIT0022 doi: 10.1006/obhd.1994.1087 – ident: CIT0007 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000324 – ident: CIT0033 doi: 10.1080/03052150902890064 – ident: CIT0066 doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2013.02.004 – ident: CIT0024 doi: 10.1080/09544828.2014.903387 |
SSID | ssj0008025 |
Score | 2.178432 |
Snippet | The work presented culminates in the development of a value model used in the conceptual phase of engineering design, with the preferences of more than one... |
SourceID | proquest crossref informaworld |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 697 |
SubjectTerms | Analytic hierarchy process analytic hierarchy process (AHP) Assessments Bargaining Decision analysis Design engineering Economic models Economics Engineering design Game theory Mathematical models multi-attribute utility theory (MAUT) Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) Multiple objective analysis Nash bargaining solution (NBS) Nash equilibrium Optimization Stakeholders |
Title | Value modelling for multi-stakeholder and multi-objective optimisation in engineering design |
URI | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09544828.2016.1214693 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1823243137 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1893891397 |
Volume | 27 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Jb9QwFLaG6QUOiFUMLchI3EapkthJ7GPFohGiXJiiHpAiO3HQMGmChoQDl_51npcs0xSV5RKNnDiO_L55fra_9xmhl8IvfJbFysuChHg0L3wPoqLQyyXnUa4SIaVOTj79EK_O6Lvz6Hw2uxyxltpGHmc_r80r-RerQhnYVWfJ_oVl-5dCAfwG-8IVLAzXP7LxJ1G2yh5mU3aMSMMQ9CDm2yq9s6QsR9KW1vKr9W_LGjzFhWPyGNWQQZZwmQ-kjmnU-psHzSaU9k317sumbo2H_aHzFsp6CNp31iWBbUWzXIntdjPaBqpKuxRraLvjtYggNqy2Yea6nhwLsrfeSD3KXCa4st6WxvAKZlVfOndspQI62Pkj5xpbJq8bpxObez0ZAhxnEprTrWnyXqwlNGhsT2K8oq7t7txCByHMM8I5Ojh5ffr-Yz-YM9-c29t_fZcEpuXZr2tiL7zZE7-dDPYmglnfQ3edEfGJxdF9NFPVA3RnJEj5EH02iMI9ojC8GE8QhQFR-Aqi8BhReFPhEVCwBcojdPb2zfrVynPnb3gZSYLGSyLJWECFVODECw5zWcVjiAAFCaXOn054EVGZMx6wjIkkU9JPlAyJjHIuw8Anj9G8qiv1BOFChZSERcZ0-JrHMRNc6hx-waIwIzlZINp1W5o5cXp9RkqZBp2GrevtVPd26np7gY77at-sOstNFfjYJmljEFtYsKbkhrpHnQFT5wS-pzA9hykJCUiyQC_629Ddet9NVKpu9TPcsAF48vQ_mj9Et4e_3BGaN7tWPYOAuJHPHWh_AaZrskU |
linkProvider | EBSCOhost |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT9wwEB5ROLQcWvpStwVqJK7eJnES28cKgZbXngBxqGTZjiO10GwF2Ut_fWecZFmoEAeuccZx_Bh_Y38zA7BrkzpRvgzcp1LwvKoTjqgo45XTuqiCtM6Rc_LptJyc50eXxeWSLwzRKsmGrrtAEVFX0-Kmw-iBEvcNYQFaFVlkZpUUHwFtPPEC1gpdSspiIJLpQhurJCZeJRFOMoMXz2PV3Nuf7kUv_U9bxy3o4A34ofEd8-RqPG_d2P99ENfxeX-3Aa97hMq-d1PqLayE5h2sL8UtfA8_Luz1PLCYRYfc2Rk2n0VqIkeweRXoSivcMGxC_3TmfnWKlc1QRf3uKUTsZ8PCXb2simySD3B-sH-2N-F9mgbuhUxbLgunVJpbF3Ct1xpNnqBLBApWZI7cbKWui9xVSqfKKyt9cIlEe164otIOLU7xEVabWRM-AatDlous9opQTlWWympHrt5WFZkXlRhBPgyO8X0Mc0qlcW3SIdRp33mGOs_0nTeC8ULsTxfE4ykBvTzypo2nJ3WX6sSIJ2Q3h2lien1wa9CKQ-QqUiFHsLMoxu6m6xnbhNmc3tHx0ljLz8_4_Fd4OTk7PTEnh9PjL_CKiiL3MNuE1fZmHrYQQ7VuOy6SfwY9DU0 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB5BkRAcKI8ilrbUSFy9TeIkto8V7apQWHGgiAOS5acELdmqzV749XgcZ2mpqh56jTOOM7YnM_E33wC800UohG09tSVntHahoNErqqgzUjbOc20MJid_nreHx_XH782IJrzIsEqMocNAFJFsNW7uMxdGRNxu9ApiUFElYFaL9AgxxGP34UGL5OGYxVHMV8ZYFKnuKopQlBmTeG7q5srn6Qp56TVjnb5As3Uw49gH4MnJdNmbqf3zH63jnV7uKTzJ_inZGxbUM7jnu-fw-BJr4Qv48U2fLj1JNXQwmZ3E0ZMETKTR1TzxeKDlz0kcQb66ML8Gs0oW0UD9zgAi8rMj_l-_xCUsyQYczw6-vj-kuUgDtYyXPeWNEaKstfFxpwcZAx4v2-gmaFYZTLLlMjS1cUKWwgrNrTcFj9E8M42TJsab7CWsdYvOvwISfFWzKliBPo5rW6GlwURvLZrKMscmUI9zo2xmMMdCGqeqHIlOs_IUKk9l5U1guhI7Gyg8bhOQlyde9enfSRgKnSh2i-zWuEpUtgYXKsZw0W9lJeMTeLtqjurGwxnd-cUS75HpyFjy13d4_A48_LI_U58-zI824RG2JOBhtQVr_fnSb0cHqjdv0hb5C56UC_E |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value+modelling+for+multi-stakeholder+and+multi-objective+optimisation+in+engineering+design&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+engineering+design&rft.au=Papageorgiou%2C+Evangelos&rft.au=Eres%2C+Murat+Hakki&rft.au=Scanlan%2C+James&rft.date=2016-10-02&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis&rft.issn=0954-4828&rft.eissn=1466-1837&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=697&rft.epage=724&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F09544828.2016.1214693&rft.externalDocID=1214693 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0954-4828&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0954-4828&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0954-4828&client=summon |