Molefe on Wiredu's Humanistic Interpretation of Akan (African) Ethics

In his 2015 Theoria article titled 'A Rejection of Humanism in African Moral Tradition', Motsamai Molefe argues that Kwasi Wiredu's humanistic interpretation of traditional Akan ethics cannot be the best account of African ethics because Wiredu overlooks the significant sentiment in t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTheoria (Pietermaritzburg) Vol. 70; no. 2; pp. 1 - 23
Main Author Agada, Ada
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Berghahn Books, Inc 01.06.2023
Subjects
Ethics
God
Humanism
Morality
Spirituality
Traditions
Worldview
United Kingdom
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:In his 2015 Theoria article titled 'A Rejection of Humanism in African Moral Tradition', Motsamai Molefe argues that Kwasi Wiredu's humanistic interpretation of traditional Akan ethics cannot be the best account of African ethics because Wiredu overlooks the significant sentiment in traditional African thought that regards reality as a holistic totality of spiritual, social and environmental components. I point out that Molefe's rejection of Wiredu's humanism follows from the latter's de-emphasising of supernaturalism. I argue that Molefe overlooks the fact that the displacement of God in this humanism is consistent with the limited God sentiment in traditional African thought, which confirms Wiredu's humanistic ethics as one rooted in traditional African worldviews. Adopting the method of philosophical exposition and analysis, I show how Wiredu's limited God framework motivates scepticism about the possibility of a supernaturalist ethics and renders a humanistic orientation a more attractive account of African moral tradition.
ISSN:0040-5817
1558-5816
DOI:10.3167/th.2023.7017502