Examining the Effect of Interruptions at Different Breakpoints and Frequencies Within a Task

• Published in: Human factors Vol. 65; no. 1; pp. 22 - 36
• Main Authors: Powers, Sarah A., Scerbo, Mark W.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.02.2023; Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
• Subjects: Attention; Between-subjects design; Breakpoints; Frustration; Humans; Segmentation; Task analysis; Task Performance and Analysis; Workload; Workloads; memory for goals theory; performance; hierarchical task analysis; event segmentation theory; mental workload
• DOI: 10.1177/00187208211009010
• ISSN: 0018-7208; 1547-8181

Objective The purpose was to explore how event segmentation theory (EST) can be used to determine optimal moments for an interruption relying on hierarchical task analysis (HTA) to identify coarse and fine event boundaries. Background Research on the effects of interruptions shows that they can be either disruptive or beneficial, depending on which aspects of an interruption are manipulated. Two important aspects that contribute to these conflicting results concern when and how often interruptions occur. Method Undergraduates completed a trip planning task divided into three subtasks. The within-subjects factor was interruption timing with three levels: none, coarse breakpoints, and fine breakpoints. The between-subjects factor was interruption frequency with two levels: one and three. The dependent measures included resumption lag, number of errors, mental workload, and frustration. Results Participants took longer to resume the primary task and reported higher mental workload when interruptions occurred at fine breakpoints. The effect of interruptions at coarse breakpoints was similar to completing the task without interruption. Interruption frequency had no effect on performance; however, participants spent significantly longer attending to interruptions in the initial task, and within a task, the first and second interruptions were attended to significantly longer than the third interruption. Conclusion The disruptiveness of an interruption is tied to the point within the task hierarchy where it occurs. Application The performance cost associated with interruptions must be considered within the task structure. Interruptions occurring at coarse breakpoints may not be disruptive or have a negative effect on mental workload.