Tata group and business response to disability (1951 to 1992) medical interventions, rehabilitation, and livelihood

Purpose This paper aims to trace Tata Group’s role in responding to disability in the decades immediately following India’s independence until the preliberalization period of the Indian economy, i.e. from the 1950s to the 1990s. Design/methodology/approach This study’s methodology entailed a histori...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of management history (2006) Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 116 - 139
Main Authors Choudhury Kaul, Sanjukta, Ghosh, Nandini
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Emerald Publishing Limited 11.01.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Purpose This paper aims to trace Tata Group’s role in responding to disability in the decades immediately following India’s independence until the preliberalization period of the Indian economy, i.e. from the 1950s to the 1990s. Design/methodology/approach This study’s methodology entailed a historiographical approach and archival engagement at Tata Archives (Pune, India) of the company documents. Materials and records of the Tata Company between 1942 and 1992. Findings Adopting the corporate culture lens, the study findings show that Tata Group demonstrated an active prosocial corporate approach toward disability. In a period governed by the ideology of a state-dominated developmental approach, Tata Group’s initiatives were related to medical interventions for a wide spectrum of disabilities, rehabilitation and efforts to ensure persons with disabilities (PWDS)’ livelihood. Originality/value Disability, in the neoliberalized economic landscape of India, is an emergent business issue for companies espousing workplace diversity. The historical understanding of business engagement with disability from postindependence to liberalization in India remains, however, limited. In postindependence India, the passive business response to disability emerged within an ethical and discretionary framework, with charity and philanthropy as the main modes of engagement. In this background, this paper explores Tata’s response to disability and PWDs, which was distinct.
ISSN:1751-1348
1758-7751
1751-1348
DOI:10.1108/JMH-12-2022-0078