Generational Differences in Work Ethic: An Examination of Measurement Equivalence Across Three Cohorts
Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP). Design/Methodology/Approach Data were collected from multip...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of business and psychology Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 315 - 324 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Boston
Springer Science + Business Media, Inc
01.06.2010
Springer US Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP). Design/Methodology/Approach Data were collected from multiple samples and combined into a large database (N= 1860). Measurement equivalence was examined using Raju et al.' s (1995) differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) procedure. Findings Several dimensions of the MWEP were not equivalent across cohorts, indicating that item content may not operate in the same manner across groups. When equivalent, several significant mean differences were detected across cohorts, indicating that respondents do differ in important work-related attitudes and behaviors. Implications Despite several reviews of generational differences across cohorts, relatively few empirical examinations have been undertaken, and no studies have yet examined the measurement equivalence of constructs across generational cohorts. These findings provide evidence that differences do exist across cohorts on dimensions of work ethic, and some differences may be a result of respondents interpreting content in different ways. Managers of multigenerational employees should consider these differences in managing employees and conflict that may arise as a result. Originality/Value This is one of the first studies to provide empirical evidence of generational differences in the work ethic construct. In addition, this is the first study to evaluate the measurement equivalence of a work ethic inventory or any other work related individual difference construct across generational cohorts. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP). Design/Methodology/Approach Data were collected from multiple samples and combined into a large database (N= 1860). Measurement equivalence was examined using Raju et al.' s (1995) differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) procedure. Findings Several dimensions of the MWEP were not equivalent across cohorts, indicating that item content may not operate in the same manner across groups. When equivalent, several significant mean differences were detected across cohorts, indicating that respondents do differ in important work-related attitudes and behaviors. Implications Despite several reviews of generational differences across cohorts, relatively few empirical examinations have been undertaken, and no studies have yet examined the measurement equivalence of constructs across generational cohorts. These findings provide evidence that differences do exist across cohorts on dimensions of work ethic, and some differences may be a result of respondents interpreting content in different ways. Managers of multigenerational employees should consider these differences in managing employees and conflict that may arise as a result. Originality/Value This is one of the first studies to provide empirical evidence of generational differences in the work ethic construct. In addition, this is the first study to evaluate the measurement equivalence of a work ethic inventory or any other work related individual difference construct across generational cohorts. Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP). Design/Methodology/Approach Data were collected from multiple samples and combined into a large database ( N = 1860). Measurement equivalence was examined using Raju et al.’s ( 1995 ) differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) procedure. Findings Several dimensions of the MWEP were not equivalent across cohorts, indicating that item content may not operate in the same manner across groups. When equivalent, several significant mean differences were detected across cohorts, indicating that respondents do differ in important work-related attitudes and behaviors. Implications Despite several reviews of generational differences across cohorts, relatively few empirical examinations have been undertaken, and no studies have yet examined the measurement equivalence of constructs across generational cohorts. These findings provide evidence that differences do exist across cohorts on dimensions of work ethic, and some differences may be a result of respondents interpreting content in different ways. Managers of multigenerational employees should consider these differences in managing employees and conflict that may arise as a result. Originality/Value This is one of the first studies to provide empirical evidence of generational differences in the work ethic construct. In addition, this is the first study to evaluate the measurement equivalence of a work ethic inventory or any other work related individual difference construct across generational cohorts. The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP). Data were collected from multiple samples and combined into a large database (N = 1860). Measurement equivalence was examined using Raju et al.'s (1995) differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) procedure. Several dimensions of the MWEP were not equivalent across cohorts, indicating that item content may not operate in the same manner across groups. When equivalent, several significant mean differences were detected across cohorts, indicating that respondents do differ in important work-related attitudes and behaviors. Despite several reviews of generational differences across cohorts, relatively few empirical examinations have been undertaken, and no studies have yet examined the measurement equivalence of constructs across generational cohorts. These findings provide evidence that differences do exist across cohorts on dimensions of work ethic, and some differences may be a result of respondents interpreting content in different ways. Managers of multigenerational employees should consider these differences in managing employees and conflict that may arise as a result. This is one of the first studies to provide empirical evidence of generational differences in the work ethic construct. In addition, this is the first study to evaluate the measurement equivalence of a work ethic inventory or any other work related individual difference construct across generational cohorts. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
Author | Woehr, David J. Meriac, John P. Banister, Christina |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: John P. surname: Meriac fullname: Meriac, John P. – sequence: 2 givenname: David J. surname: Woehr fullname: Woehr, David J. – sequence: 3 givenname: Christina surname: Banister fullname: Banister, Christina |
BookMark | eNp9kE9PGzEUxK0KpCa0H6CHSlbvW57X63_copAGpKBeguBmOd63zYbEJvamgm_PJluhnji9y_xm3syYnIUYkJBvDH4yAHWZGWhpCmBQGCarQn0iIyYUL7jgj2dkBFqbgpdSfybjnDcAIJiEEWnmGDC5ro3Bbel12zSYMHjMtA30IaYnOuvWrb-ik0BnL27XhpOWxobeocuHhDsMHZ3tD-1ftz2SdOJTzJku1wmRTuM6pi5_IeeN22b8-u9ekPtfs-X0plj8nt9OJ4vCc6m7whnupZKudLXTq6pqxMp75PWqrnRfTZU1GvDCNGUpuFiV6EtdCV2DU7xGqPgF-TH4Pqe4P2Du7CYeUl8tW2akAaaY6UVsEJ0eTdjY59TuXHq1DOxxTTusaftIe1zTqp4pByb32vAH03_GH0DfB2iTu5jeUyqQIJQ2_A0PVYO2 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_1548051814529825 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4794830 crossref_primary_10_4102_sajhrm_v13i1_681 crossref_primary_10_1177_0972150914564417 crossref_primary_10_1002_hrdq_21374 crossref_primary_10_1080_00221309_2016_1258386 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2630650 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15097058 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sapharm_2014_08_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2021_e07698 crossref_primary_10_1080_13602381_2017_1281642 crossref_primary_10_1177_1094428116689708 crossref_primary_10_1111_jasp_12208 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lindif_2014_11_006 crossref_primary_10_1111_joss_12920 crossref_primary_10_1002_nha3_20061 crossref_primary_10_1080_15555240_2014_933961 crossref_primary_10_1108_IntR_03_2017_0135 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_609842 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_023_05038_6 crossref_primary_10_1177_0002716219829016 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10551_017_3725_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhm_2012_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procs_2021_09_114 crossref_primary_10_3923_rjbm_2012_52_60 crossref_primary_10_1108_CCM_12_2013_0190 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11036_020_01518_2 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40991_018_0037_0 crossref_primary_10_21511_ppm_18_1__2020_21 crossref_primary_10_1108_cpoib_01_2018_0012 crossref_primary_10_1177_0032885515618467 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11187_018_0079_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_riob_2015_10_003 crossref_primary_10_3390_jtaer19010023 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12062_019_09250_w crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare10081399 crossref_primary_10_1080_09585192_2011_654348 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhm_2012_02_007 crossref_primary_10_1002_ca_22953 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lindif_2012_03_015 crossref_primary_10_3727_152599518X15403853721312 crossref_primary_10_4102_sajip_v45i0_1638 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iimb_2012_01_004 crossref_primary_10_1177_10596011221146363 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijop_12480 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJSMS_09_2019_0094 crossref_primary_10_1097_NNA_0000000000000791 crossref_primary_10_1177_1548051812442747 crossref_primary_10_1111_jphs_12081 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJQSS_04_2013_0023 crossref_primary_10_1108_YC_10_2022_1625 crossref_primary_10_1080_10941665_2024_2351126 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13084207 crossref_primary_10_1108_TPM_06_2016_0027 crossref_primary_10_1108_JMP_03_2017_0115 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJOA_02_2019_1653 crossref_primary_10_1177_0020852312444854 crossref_primary_10_22495_jgr_v4_i1_p6 crossref_primary_10_1108_JGR_01_2023_0012 crossref_primary_10_1080_13678868_2016_1222486 crossref_primary_10_1002_soej_12350 crossref_primary_10_17645_mac_v8i2_2772 crossref_primary_10_3917_risa_783_0475 crossref_primary_10_1080_22243534_2018_1501957 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10869_023_09921_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_020_00854_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tourman_2018_05_011 crossref_primary_10_1108_17473611211203939 crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2016_1141403 crossref_primary_10_19181_4m_2021_52_2 crossref_primary_10_1142_S1363919619500452 crossref_primary_10_18394_iid_440968 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJWBR_06_2021_0033 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03670_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssresearch_2024_103038 crossref_primary_10_1108_PR_02_2018_0071 crossref_primary_10_4102_sajip_v43_1393 crossref_primary_10_1080_01443410_2014_895291 crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_01_2013_0027 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10551_014_2481_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10869_010_9177_2 crossref_primary_10_1108_MRR_05_2015_0118 crossref_primary_10_1108_YC_07_2019_1017 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20010492 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2016_03_014 crossref_primary_10_1080_09669582_2019_1632320 crossref_primary_10_3390_admsci13050136 crossref_primary_10_1097_TGR_0000000000000152 crossref_primary_10_48175_IJARSCT_14325 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvb_2021_103585 crossref_primary_10_1002_ca_23294 crossref_primary_10_6000_1929_4409_2020_09_161 crossref_primary_10_1080_17543266_2013_795611 crossref_primary_10_1111_caim_12243 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2022_112037 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jretconser_2017_01_010 crossref_primary_10_1108_JSIT_01_2020_0005 crossref_primary_10_1177_1056492615616692 crossref_primary_10_1111_1468_4446_12014 crossref_primary_10_1108_MD_09_2015_0387 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12114417 crossref_primary_10_1080_10439463_2015_1081388 crossref_primary_10_1080_01463373_2016_1259175 crossref_primary_10_1111_ijsa_12304 crossref_primary_10_1108_IHR_07_2020_0023 crossref_primary_10_2308_jfar_51931 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_67_1_012027 crossref_primary_10_22495_jgr_v4_i1_c2_p6 crossref_primary_10_11118_actaun201967061627 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10551_023_05325_z crossref_primary_10_1108_MRR_06_2017_0193 crossref_primary_10_1108_EDI_07_2016_0062 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10734_014_9825_y crossref_primary_10_1097_01_JAA_0000435187_33277_a4 crossref_primary_10_1002_ase_1866 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10869_016_9460_y crossref_primary_10_1108_EJM_04_2022_0267 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techfore_2023_122801 crossref_primary_10_15388_omee_2019_10_12 crossref_primary_10_3390_su15065058 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joep_2013_07_010 crossref_primary_10_1177_0170840614550732 crossref_primary_10_3390_su10124737 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_emj_2013_12_002 crossref_primary_10_1108_IJCMA_08_2019_0124 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvb_2013_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1080_13632434_2013_869206 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10551_012_1450_z crossref_primary_10_1108_PR_12_2022_0894 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lindif_2011_04_003 crossref_primary_10_1080_10548408_2021_1921672 |
Cites_doi | 10.1177/014662169501900405 10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.001 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00044-1 10.1177/01466219922031437 10.1097/00126450-200019010-00011 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1838 10.1097/00005110-200411000-00005 10.1108/02683940810904358 10.2307/255750 10.1177/1094428104268027 10.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.003 10.1108/02683940810904367 10.1177/0013164406292036 10.1108/02683940810904385 10.1007/BF03372160 10.1002/job.147 10.1108/02683940810904376 10.3102/10769986004003207 10.1177/014662168300700208 10.1108/02683940810904394 10.1177/109442810031002 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2010 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2010 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC – notice: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION 0U~ 1-H 3V. 7WY 7WZ 7XB 87Z 88C 88G 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8FL ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR BEZIV CCPQU DWQXO FRNLG FYUFA F~G GHDGH GNUQQ K60 K6~ L.- L.0 M0C M0T M2M PQBIZ PQBZA PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PSYQQ Q9U |
DOI | 10.1007/s10869-010-9164-7 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Global News & ABI/Inform Professional Trade PRO ProQuest Central (Corporate) ABI/INFORM Collection ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition) Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Psychology Database (Alumni) ProQuest Pharma Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Business Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Business Premium Collection (Alumni) Health Research Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Business Collection ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Professional Standard ABI/INFORM Global Healthcare Administration Database Psychology Database ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College Trade PRO ProQuest Pharma Collection ABI/INFORM Complete ProQuest Central Global News & ABI/Inform Professional ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced Health Research Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Professional Standard ProQuest Central Korea ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition) Business Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health Management ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) Business Premium Collection (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Psychology Business |
EISSN | 1573-353X |
EndPage | 324 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2033951261 10_1007_s10869_010_9164_7 40605789 |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | -4V -55 -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .86 .VR 06D 0R~ 0VY 199 1N0 203 29K 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2LR 2VQ 2~H 30V 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5GY 5VS 67Z 6NX 78A 7WY 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FL 8TC 8UJ 8VB 95- 95. 95~ 96X AABHQ AACDK AAHCP AAHNG AAIAL AAJBT AAJKR AANZL AARHV AARTL AASML AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO AAYZH ABAKF ABBBX ABBHK ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABECW ABFTD ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIVO ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKTR ABKVW ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABPLI ABQBU ABQSL ABSXP ABTEG ABTHY ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ABXSQ ABYRZ ABYYQ ACAOD ACBXY ACDTI ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACHSB ACHXU ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACNCT ACNXV ACOKC ACOMO ACREN ACSNA ACUHF ACVFL ACXJH ACZOJ ADACV ADBBV ADGDI ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADKNI ADKPE ADMHG ADPTO ADRFC ADTPH ADULT ADURQ ADYFF ADYOE ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AEMSY AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AETLH AEUPB AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFGCZ AFKRA AFLOW AFQWF AFWTZ AFYQB AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGJBK AGMZJ AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAJD AHBYD AHEXP AHKAY AHSBF AHYZX AIAKS AIGIU AIIXL AILAN AITGF AJBLW AJRNO AJZVZ AKVCP ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMTXH AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG APTMU AQUVI ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AYQZM AZFZN AZQEC AZRUE B-. BA0 BAPOH BDATZ BENPR BEZIV BGNMA BHNFS BPHCQ BSONS BVXVI CAG CBXGM CCPQU CHNMF COF CS3 CSCUP D-I DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 DWQXO EBLON EBO EBS EBU EHE EIOEI EJD ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRNLG FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNUQQ GNWQR GPZZG GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH GXS HECYW HF~ HG5 HG6 HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IJ- IKXTQ IPSME ITM IWAJR IXC IXE IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z JAAYA JAB JBMMH JBSCW JBU JCJTX JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLXEF JPL JPPEU JSODD JST JZLTJ K1G K60 K6~ KDC KOV LAK LLZTM M0C M0T M2M M4Y MA- N2Q NB0 NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM P19 P2P P9L PF- PQBIZ PQBZA PQQKQ PROAC PSYQQ PT4 PT5 Q2X QF4 QM6 QN7 QOK QOS QWB R-Y R89 R9I RHV RNS ROL RPX RSV S16 S27 S3B SA0 SAP SBS SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SZN T13 TAE TH9 TSG TSK TSV TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WIP WK8 YLTOR Z45 Z7X Z81 Z83 Z86 Z88 Z8U Z8W Z92 ZCA ZL0 ZMTXR ZMU ZOVNA ~8M ~A9 ~EX 1SB 2.D 28- 2P1 5QI 8H~ AABYN AAFGU AANQY AAYFA ABFGW ABKAS ABPTK ACBMV ACBRV ACBYP ACDPM ACIGE ACIPQ ACTTH ACVWB ACWMK ACYUM ADMDM ADMHP ADOXG AEEQQ AEFIE AEFTE AESTI AEVTX AFEXP AFFNX AFNRJ AGGBP AGGDS AHAVH AIMYW AJDOV AKQUC AQQCX BBWZM CWXUR CZBKB IHE IRVIT KOW NDZJH O-J OVD R4E RNI RZC RZD RZK S1Z S26 S28 SBU SCLPG T16 TEORI UNUBA WK6 Z5O Z7R Z7Y Z8M Z8S AAEOY AAYXX AFQWV CITATION H13 0U~ 1-H 7XB 8FK L.- L.0 PQEST PQUKI Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a93c676a2ada8b44f5bcce3dbd4801072de90c59f22535b2ec28458d0a73de043 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 0889-3268 |
IngestDate | Thu Dec 05 17:02:12 EST 2024 Fri Dec 06 01:00:05 EST 2024 Sat Dec 16 12:03:55 EST 2023 Tue Dec 10 22:55:04 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Millennials Generational cohorts Baby Boomers Work ethic Generation X |
Language | English |
License | http://www.springer.com/tdm |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c368t-a93c676a2ada8b44f5bcce3dbd4801072de90c59f22535b2ec28458d0a73de043 |
PQID | 196901719 |
PQPubID | 38113 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_196901719 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10869_010_9164_7 springer_journals_10_1007_s10869_010_9164_7 jstor_primary_40605789 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2010-06-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2010 text: 2010-06-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Boston |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Boston – name: New York |
PublicationTitle | Journal of business and psychology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | J Bus Psychol |
PublicationYear | 2010 |
Publisher | Springer Science + Business Media, Inc Springer US Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – sequence: 0 name: Springer Science + Business Media, Inc – sequence: 0 name: Springer Nature B.V – name: Springer US |
References | PogsonCCoberADoverspikeDRogersJDifferences in self-reported work ethic across three career stagesJournal of Vocational Behavior20036218920110.1016/S0001-8791(02)00044-1 Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a pattern of graded scores [Monograph]. Psychometrika Supplement No. 17. BakerFEQUATE 2.1: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory (version 2.1)1995MadisonLaboratory of Experimental Design, University of Wisconsin MeriacJPPolingTLWoehrDJAre there gender differences in work ethic?: An examination of the measurement equivalence of the multidimensional work ethic profilePersonality and Individual Differences20094720921310.1016/j.paid.2009.03.001 Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York, NY: Scribners. (Original work published 1904–1905). DriesNPepermansRDe KerpelEExploring four generations’ beliefs about career: Is “satisfied” the new “successful”?Journal of Managerial Psychology20082390792810.1108/02683940810904394 FlowersCPOshimaTCRajuNSA description and demonstration of the polytomous-DFIT frameworkApplied Psychological Measurement19992330932610.1177/01466219922031437 RajuNSvan der LindenWFleerPAn IRT-based internal measure of test bias with implications for differential item functioningApplied Psychological Measurement19951935336810.1177/014662169501900405 SmolaKWSuttonCDGenerational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millenniumJournal of Organizational Behavior20022336338210.1002/job.147 KupperschmidtBMultigeneration employees: Strategies for effective managementHealth Care Manager200019657611183655 O’Connell, P. O. (2008, August 25). What’s eating gen X. Business Week, pp. 61–62. ThissenDMULTILOG 7.03: A computer program for multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory2003ChicagoScientific Software, Inc. RajuNSDFITPS6: A Fortran program for calculating polytomous DIF/DTF [Computer program]1999ChicagoIllinois Institute of Technology LancasterLCStillmanDWhen generations collide: Who they are. Why they clash. How to solve the generational puzzle at work2002New York, NYHarperCollins Publishers, Inc. TwengeJMCampbellSMGenerational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplaceJournal of Managerial Psychology20082386287710.1108/02683940810904367 VandenbergRJLanceCEA review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational researchOrganizational Research Methods2000346910.1177/109442810031002 ZemkeRRainesCFilipczakBGenerations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, xers and nexters in your workplace1999New York, NYAmacom MeadeAWLautenschlagerGJA comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invarianceOrganizational Research Methods2004736138810.1177/1094428104268027 ZickarMBroadfootALanceCEVandenbergRJThe partial revival of a dead horse? Comparing classical test theory and item response theoryStatistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences2009New York, NYRoutledge3759 CennamoLGardnerDGenerational differences in work values, outcomes, and person-organization values fitJournal of Managerial Psychology20082389190610.1108/02683940810904385 EmbretsonSEReiseSPItem response theory for psychologists2000Mahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum and Associates MackyKGardnerDForsythSGenerational differences at work: Introduction and overviewJournal of Managerial Psychology20082385786110.1108/02683940810904358 MillerMJWoehrDJHudspethNThe meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventoryJournal of Vocational Behavior20026045148910.1006/jvbe.2001.1838 ReckaseMDUnifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implicationsJournal of Educational Statistics1979420723010.2307/1164671 WongMGardinerELangWCoulonLGenerational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace?Journal of Managerial Psychology20082387889010.1108/02683940810904376 WoehrDJArchinegaLLimDExamining work ethic across populations: A comparison of the multidimensional work ethic profile across three diverse culturesEducational and Psychological Measurement20076715416810.1177/0013164406292036 ter BogtTRaaijmakersQvan WelFSocialization and development of the work ethic among adolescents and young adultsJournal of Vocational Behavior20056642043710.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.003 CherringtonDJCondieSJEnglandJLAge and work valuesAcademy of Management Journal19792261762310.2307/255750 DuchscherJEBCowinLMultigenerational nurses in the workplaceJournal of Nursing Administration20043449350110.1097/00005110-200411000-00005 StockingMLLordFMDeveloping a common metric in item response theoryApplied Psychological Measurement1983720121010.1177/014662168300700208 Erickson, T. (2008, August 25). Don’t treat them like baby boomers. Business Week, p. 64. Pham, V. H., Case, J., Miyake, L., & Gil, S. (2008). The gen Y perceptions study. Retrieved from Cal State Fullerton Career Center website http://campusapps2.fullerton.edu/career/pdf/Gen_Y.pdf. R Zemke (9164_CR35) 1999 M Wong (9164_CR34) 2008; 23 SE Embretson (9164_CR9) 2000 JEB Duchscher (9164_CR8) 2004; 34 9164_CR24 KW Smola (9164_CR25) 2002; 23 JM Twenge (9164_CR30) 2008; 23 DJ Cherrington (9164_CR3) 1979; 22 ML Stocking (9164_CR26) 1983; 7 N Dries (9164_CR7) 2008; 23 LC Lancaster (9164_CR13) 2002 M Zickar (9164_CR36) 2009 NS Raju (9164_CR22) 1995; 19 MD Reckase (9164_CR23) 1979; 4 F Baker (9164_CR1) 1995 9164_CR19 L Cennamo (9164_CR2) 2008; 23 CP Flowers (9164_CR11) 1999; 23 JP Meriac (9164_CR16) 2009; 47 9164_CR18 NS Raju (9164_CR21) 1999 9164_CR10 K Macky (9164_CR14) 2008; 23 9164_CR32 T ter Bogt (9164_CR28) 2005; 66 DJ Woehr (9164_CR33) 2007; 67 AW Meade (9164_CR15) 2004; 7 RJ Vandenberg (9164_CR31) 2000; 3 B Kupperschmidt (9164_CR12) 2000; 19 C Pogson (9164_CR20) 2003; 62 D Thissen (9164_CR29) 2003 MJ Miller (9164_CR17) 2002; 60 |
References_xml | – start-page: 37 volume-title: Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences year: 2009 ident: 9164_CR36 contributor: fullname: M Zickar – volume-title: EQUATE 2.1: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory (version 2.1) year: 1995 ident: 9164_CR1 contributor: fullname: F Baker – volume-title: Item response theory for psychologists year: 2000 ident: 9164_CR9 contributor: fullname: SE Embretson – volume: 19 start-page: 353 year: 1995 ident: 9164_CR22 publication-title: Applied Psychological Measurement doi: 10.1177/014662169501900405 contributor: fullname: NS Raju – volume: 47 start-page: 209 year: 2009 ident: 9164_CR16 publication-title: Personality and Individual Differences doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.001 contributor: fullname: JP Meriac – volume-title: MULTILOG 7.03: A computer program for multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory year: 2003 ident: 9164_CR29 contributor: fullname: D Thissen – volume: 62 start-page: 189 year: 2003 ident: 9164_CR20 publication-title: Journal of Vocational Behavior doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00044-1 contributor: fullname: C Pogson – volume: 23 start-page: 309 year: 1999 ident: 9164_CR11 publication-title: Applied Psychological Measurement doi: 10.1177/01466219922031437 contributor: fullname: CP Flowers – volume: 19 start-page: 65 year: 2000 ident: 9164_CR12 publication-title: Health Care Manager doi: 10.1097/00126450-200019010-00011 contributor: fullname: B Kupperschmidt – volume: 60 start-page: 451 year: 2002 ident: 9164_CR17 publication-title: Journal of Vocational Behavior doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1838 contributor: fullname: MJ Miller – volume: 34 start-page: 493 year: 2004 ident: 9164_CR8 publication-title: Journal of Nursing Administration doi: 10.1097/00005110-200411000-00005 contributor: fullname: JEB Duchscher – volume: 23 start-page: 857 year: 2008 ident: 9164_CR14 publication-title: Journal of Managerial Psychology doi: 10.1108/02683940810904358 contributor: fullname: K Macky – ident: 9164_CR19 – ident: 9164_CR32 – volume-title: When generations collide: Who they are. Why they clash. How to solve the generational puzzle at work year: 2002 ident: 9164_CR13 contributor: fullname: LC Lancaster – volume: 22 start-page: 617 year: 1979 ident: 9164_CR3 publication-title: Academy of Management Journal doi: 10.2307/255750 contributor: fullname: DJ Cherrington – volume: 7 start-page: 361 year: 2004 ident: 9164_CR15 publication-title: Organizational Research Methods doi: 10.1177/1094428104268027 contributor: fullname: AW Meade – volume: 66 start-page: 420 year: 2005 ident: 9164_CR28 publication-title: Journal of Vocational Behavior doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.003 contributor: fullname: T ter Bogt – volume-title: Generations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, xers and nexters in your workplace year: 1999 ident: 9164_CR35 contributor: fullname: R Zemke – volume: 23 start-page: 862 year: 2008 ident: 9164_CR30 publication-title: Journal of Managerial Psychology doi: 10.1108/02683940810904367 contributor: fullname: JM Twenge – volume: 67 start-page: 154 year: 2007 ident: 9164_CR33 publication-title: Educational and Psychological Measurement doi: 10.1177/0013164406292036 contributor: fullname: DJ Woehr – volume: 23 start-page: 891 year: 2008 ident: 9164_CR2 publication-title: Journal of Managerial Psychology doi: 10.1108/02683940810904385 contributor: fullname: L Cennamo – ident: 9164_CR24 doi: 10.1007/BF03372160 – volume: 23 start-page: 363 year: 2002 ident: 9164_CR25 publication-title: Journal of Organizational Behavior doi: 10.1002/job.147 contributor: fullname: KW Smola – volume: 23 start-page: 878 year: 2008 ident: 9164_CR34 publication-title: Journal of Managerial Psychology doi: 10.1108/02683940810904376 contributor: fullname: M Wong – volume: 4 start-page: 207 year: 1979 ident: 9164_CR23 publication-title: Journal of Educational Statistics doi: 10.3102/10769986004003207 contributor: fullname: MD Reckase – volume: 7 start-page: 201 year: 1983 ident: 9164_CR26 publication-title: Applied Psychological Measurement doi: 10.1177/014662168300700208 contributor: fullname: ML Stocking – volume: 23 start-page: 907 year: 2008 ident: 9164_CR7 publication-title: Journal of Managerial Psychology doi: 10.1108/02683940810904394 contributor: fullname: N Dries – ident: 9164_CR10 – volume: 3 start-page: 4 year: 2000 ident: 9164_CR31 publication-title: Organizational Research Methods doi: 10.1177/109442810031002 contributor: fullname: RJ Vandenberg – ident: 9164_CR18 – volume-title: DFITPS6: A Fortran program for calculating polytomous DIF/DTF [Computer program] year: 1999 ident: 9164_CR21 contributor: fullname: NS Raju |
SSID | ssj0005160 |
Score | 2.3585484 |
Snippet | Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions... Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions... The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the... |
SourceID | proquest crossref springer jstor |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 315 |
SubjectTerms | Age Age differences Attitudes Baby Boom generation Baby boomers Behavioral Science and Psychology Business and Management Careers Community and Environmental Psychology Differences Generation X Generational differences Gratification Industrial and Organizational Psychology Item response theory Millennial generation Millennials Occupational psychology Personality and Social Psychology Psychological aspects Psychology Recreation Social generations Social Sciences Studies Values Work ethic Workplaces |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium dbid: AGYKE link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3JTsMwEB1BKyEuLAVEKSAfOIFcmcSJHW5VKVSgcqJSOUW24wiElLK0EvD1jLO0ZTtwthMrnvHMy_j5GeBImigUmknKExVQrlNJVWAE5ZHytGAa_4lcvWNwE_aH_GoUjJbAm5Uussd2tSOZB-qFs24ydNQehusz5FQsQx1Tj1uM9c7l3XVvTuw4zc8G5_wdBCey2sv87SVfslFBSPwCNb_tjuZJ52K9OAj4mmsVOq7JY3s60W3z8VPJ8R_fswFrJQYlncJpNmHJZg1YqSjwDVidRcX3LUgLYeqiZEjOy_tUMLqQh4y4UjvJKfNnpJOR3ptyzBrXl4xTMpjXH0nvefqATu2eJJ18MsgtupEl3fG927TYhuFF77bbp-XlDNT4oZxQFfkmFKHyVKKk5jwNtDHWT3TiBGmY8BIbMRNEKQYMP9CeNZgIA5kwJfzEMu7vQC0bZ3YXiI-_TDbCsBzYlDvEKlnKuD61CO0sU6YJx5WR4qdCgyOeqy27aYxxxNhNYyyasJObcdYTEQtiUhk1oVXZNS7X6WvsxIGcYhC2nlRmWmj9a5C9f_VuwWrBOXC1m32oTV6m9gChzEQflr77CUQx6HQ priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | Generational Differences in Work Ethic: An Examination of Measurement Equivalence Across Three Cohorts |
URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/40605789 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10869-010-9164-7 https://www.proquest.com/docview/196901719 |
Volume | 25 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3dS8MwED_cBuKL-DWcHyMPPinBrE3b1BfptFMUh4gDfSpJmuJeuk0n6H9vrh-bCvrUhyZNuUsuv9z9cgdwJHToB4oJylPpUa4yQaWnA8pD6aiAKXsmQn_H3dC_HvGbJ--p4ua8VbTK2iYWhjqdaPSRn2IaF8ztEp5PZxSLRmFwtaqg0YCW03OFaEKrHw_vH5Ycj15xTbig8licIuqwZnl3TvhIFWJ2vfucBj82ppKb-AN1_gqUFvvPYAPWK-BIolLTm7Bi8i1YrXnrW7C2MGWf25CV2aRLPx-5rIqgWJNAxjlB_zgpeO5nJMpJ_CGRDoNtySQjd0unIYln72M7E7EniYrfJo9W94ZcTF4w0rADo0H8eHFNq4oKVLu-mFMZutoPfOnIVArFeeYprY2bqhSzyLDASU3ItBdmdpW7nnKMtruXJ1ImAzc1jLttaOaT3OwCce05x4TWlnom4wgzBcsYVz1j8ZhhUnfguBZnMi0TZyTLFMko-8SOmKDsk6AD7ULgi5YWZlggKcIO7NcaSKrF9ZYspkIHTmqlfHv71yB7_35rH9ZKYgA6WA6gOX99N4cWb8xVF1rRoN8f4vPq-TbuVrOsC42RE30BaXHVAA |
link.rule.ids | 314,780,784,21388,27924,27925,33744,41081,41523,42150,42592,43805,52111,52234,74302 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT8MwDLZgSLALggFiPHPgBIoIa9KmXNCATQO2CaEhcauSNBW7dMA2Cf49cR8bQ4Jz06ayHeeL_cUGOJEm9APNJOWxEpTrRFIlTEB5qBo6YNqdiTDe0ev7nWd-_yJeCm7OuKBVlj4xc9TxyGCM_BzLuGBtl_Dq7Z1i0yhMrhYdNJZhBQuniwqsXLf6j09zjsdFdk04o_I4nCLLtGZ-d076SBVibr37nAYLG1POTVxAnb8Spdn-096A9QI4kmau6U1YsmkNVkveeg2qM1f2tQVJXk06j_OR26IJinMJZJgSjI-TjOd-SZopaX0qpMPgWDJKSG8eNCSt9-nQWSK-SZrZb5OB070lN6NXzDRsw3O7Nbjp0KKjAjWeLydUhZ7xA181VKyk5jwR2hjrxTrGKjIsaMQ2ZEaEiVvlntANa9zuJWTMVODFlnFvByrpKLW7QDx3zrGh86XCJhxhpmQJ4_rCOjxmmTJ1OC3FGb3lhTOieYlklH3kZoxQ9lFQh51M4LORDmY4ICnDOuyXGoiKxTWOZqZQh7NSKT-e_jXJ3r_fOoa1zqDXjbp3_Yd9qOYkAQy2HEBl8jG1hw57TPRRYWHfL6PT7w |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT8MwDLZgSIgL4inGMwdOoIjQpm3KBQ3YxHNCCCRuVZKmYpeOx5Dg32O36QZIcG7aVI5jf7G_2AC7yqZxYoTiMtcRl6ZQXEc24TLVgUmEwTMRxTtu-vH5g7x8jB59SaE3T6tsbGJlqPOhpRj5AZVxodou6UHhWRG3Z73j5xdODaQo0eq7aUzDDDpFEbRg5qTbv72b8D0OqyvDFa0HMYtqUpz1PToVE21I4N6PJU9-OKmap_gDgf5Kmla-qLcA8x5Esk696osw5colmG047EswNzZrn8tQ1JWl65gfO_MNUdA8sEHJKFbOKs77EeuUrPuhiRpDY9mwYDeTACLrvrwPUCvpTdapfpvdox44djp8oqzDCjz0uven59x3V-A2jNWI6zS0cRLrQOdaGSmLyFjrwtzkVFFGJEHuUmGjtMAdH0YmcBY9WaRyoZMwd0KGq9Aqh6VbAxbimcelaFcjV0iCnEoUQppDh9jMCW3bsNeIM3uui2hkk3LJJPsMZ8xI9lnShtVK4OORCDkQVKq0DRvNCmR-o71lY7Vow36zKN-e_jXJ-r_f2oFZVK7s-qJ_tQFzNV-A4i6b0Bq9vrsthCEjs-0V7Ask0dgc |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Generational+Differences+in+Work+Ethic%3A+An+Examination+of+Measurement+Equivalence+Across+Three+Cohorts&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+business+and+psychology&rft.au=Meriac%2C+John+P.&rft.au=Woehr%2C+David+J.&rft.au=Banister%2C+Christina&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.pub=Springer+Science+%2B+Business+Media%2C+Inc&rft.issn=0889-3268&rft.eissn=1573-353X&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=324&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs10869-010-9164-7&rft.externalDocID=40605789 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0889-3268&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0889-3268&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0889-3268&client=summon |