Generational Differences in Work Ethic: An Examination of Measurement Equivalence Across Three Cohorts

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP). Design/Methodology/Approach Data were collected from multip...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of business and psychology Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 315 - 324
Main Authors Meriac, John P., Woehr, David J., Banister, Christina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer Science + Business Media, Inc 01.06.2010
Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP). Design/Methodology/Approach Data were collected from multiple samples and combined into a large database (N= 1860). Measurement equivalence was examined using Raju et al.' s (1995) differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) procedure. Findings Several dimensions of the MWEP were not equivalent across cohorts, indicating that item content may not operate in the same manner across groups. When equivalent, several significant mean differences were detected across cohorts, indicating that respondents do differ in important work-related attitudes and behaviors. Implications Despite several reviews of generational differences across cohorts, relatively few empirical examinations have been undertaken, and no studies have yet examined the measurement equivalence of constructs across generational cohorts. These findings provide evidence that differences do exist across cohorts on dimensions of work ethic, and some differences may be a result of respondents interpreting content in different ways. Managers of multigenerational employees should consider these differences in managing employees and conflict that may arise as a result. Originality/Value This is one of the first studies to provide empirical evidence of generational differences in the work ethic construct. In addition, this is the first study to evaluate the measurement equivalence of a work ethic inventory or any other work related individual difference construct across generational cohorts.
AbstractList Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP). Design/Methodology/Approach Data were collected from multiple samples and combined into a large database (N= 1860). Measurement equivalence was examined using Raju et al.' s (1995) differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) procedure. Findings Several dimensions of the MWEP were not equivalent across cohorts, indicating that item content may not operate in the same manner across groups. When equivalent, several significant mean differences were detected across cohorts, indicating that respondents do differ in important work-related attitudes and behaviors. Implications Despite several reviews of generational differences across cohorts, relatively few empirical examinations have been undertaken, and no studies have yet examined the measurement equivalence of constructs across generational cohorts. These findings provide evidence that differences do exist across cohorts on dimensions of work ethic, and some differences may be a result of respondents interpreting content in different ways. Managers of multigenerational employees should consider these differences in managing employees and conflict that may arise as a result. Originality/Value This is one of the first studies to provide empirical evidence of generational differences in the work ethic construct. In addition, this is the first study to evaluate the measurement equivalence of a work ethic inventory or any other work related individual difference construct across generational cohorts.
Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP). Design/Methodology/Approach Data were collected from multiple samples and combined into a large database ( N  = 1860). Measurement equivalence was examined using Raju et al.’s ( 1995 ) differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) procedure. Findings Several dimensions of the MWEP were not equivalent across cohorts, indicating that item content may not operate in the same manner across groups. When equivalent, several significant mean differences were detected across cohorts, indicating that respondents do differ in important work-related attitudes and behaviors. Implications Despite several reviews of generational differences across cohorts, relatively few empirical examinations have been undertaken, and no studies have yet examined the measurement equivalence of constructs across generational cohorts. These findings provide evidence that differences do exist across cohorts on dimensions of work ethic, and some differences may be a result of respondents interpreting content in different ways. Managers of multigenerational employees should consider these differences in managing employees and conflict that may arise as a result. Originality/Value This is one of the first studies to provide empirical evidence of generational differences in the work ethic construct. In addition, this is the first study to evaluate the measurement equivalence of a work ethic inventory or any other work related individual difference construct across generational cohorts.
The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the work ethic construct using the multidimensional work ethic profile (MWEP). Data were collected from multiple samples and combined into a large database (N = 1860). Measurement equivalence was examined using Raju et al.'s (1995) differential functioning of items and tests (DFIT) procedure. Several dimensions of the MWEP were not equivalent across cohorts, indicating that item content may not operate in the same manner across groups. When equivalent, several significant mean differences were detected across cohorts, indicating that respondents do differ in important work-related attitudes and behaviors. Despite several reviews of generational differences across cohorts, relatively few empirical examinations have been undertaken, and no studies have yet examined the measurement equivalence of constructs across generational cohorts. These findings provide evidence that differences do exist across cohorts on dimensions of work ethic, and some differences may be a result of respondents interpreting content in different ways. Managers of multigenerational employees should consider these differences in managing employees and conflict that may arise as a result. This is one of the first studies to provide empirical evidence of generational differences in the work ethic construct. In addition, this is the first study to evaluate the measurement equivalence of a work ethic inventory or any other work related individual difference construct across generational cohorts. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Author Woehr, David J.
Meriac, John P.
Banister, Christina
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: John P.
  surname: Meriac
  fullname: Meriac, John P.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: David J.
  surname: Woehr
  fullname: Woehr, David J.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Christina
  surname: Banister
  fullname: Banister, Christina
BookMark eNp9kE9PGzEUxK0KpCa0H6CHSlbvW57X63_copAGpKBeguBmOd63zYbEJvamgm_PJluhnji9y_xm3syYnIUYkJBvDH4yAHWZGWhpCmBQGCarQn0iIyYUL7jgj2dkBFqbgpdSfybjnDcAIJiEEWnmGDC5ro3Bbel12zSYMHjMtA30IaYnOuvWrb-ik0BnL27XhpOWxobeocuHhDsMHZ3tD-1ftz2SdOJTzJku1wmRTuM6pi5_IeeN22b8-u9ekPtfs-X0plj8nt9OJ4vCc6m7whnupZKudLXTq6pqxMp75PWqrnRfTZU1GvDCNGUpuFiV6EtdCV2DU7xGqPgF-TH4Pqe4P2Du7CYeUl8tW2akAaaY6UVsEJ0eTdjY59TuXHq1DOxxTTusaftIe1zTqp4pByb32vAH03_GH0DfB2iTu5jeUyqQIJQ2_A0PVYO2
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1177_1548051814529825
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4794830
crossref_primary_10_4102_sajhrm_v13i1_681
crossref_primary_10_1177_0972150914564417
crossref_primary_10_1002_hrdq_21374
crossref_primary_10_1080_00221309_2016_1258386
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2630650
crossref_primary_10_3390_su15097058
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sapharm_2014_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2021_e07698
crossref_primary_10_1080_13602381_2017_1281642
crossref_primary_10_1177_1094428116689708
crossref_primary_10_1111_jasp_12208
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lindif_2014_11_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_joss_12920
crossref_primary_10_1002_nha3_20061
crossref_primary_10_1080_15555240_2014_933961
crossref_primary_10_1108_IntR_03_2017_0135
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_609842
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_023_05038_6
crossref_primary_10_1177_0002716219829016
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10551_017_3725_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhm_2012_04_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procs_2021_09_114
crossref_primary_10_3923_rjbm_2012_52_60
crossref_primary_10_1108_CCM_12_2013_0190
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11036_020_01518_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40991_018_0037_0
crossref_primary_10_21511_ppm_18_1__2020_21
crossref_primary_10_1108_cpoib_01_2018_0012
crossref_primary_10_1177_0032885515618467
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11187_018_0079_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_riob_2015_10_003
crossref_primary_10_3390_jtaer19010023
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12062_019_09250_w
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare10081399
crossref_primary_10_1080_09585192_2011_654348
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijhm_2012_02_007
crossref_primary_10_1002_ca_22953
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lindif_2012_03_015
crossref_primary_10_3727_152599518X15403853721312
crossref_primary_10_4102_sajip_v45i0_1638
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_iimb_2012_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1177_10596011221146363
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijop_12480
crossref_primary_10_1108_IJSMS_09_2019_0094
crossref_primary_10_1097_NNA_0000000000000791
crossref_primary_10_1177_1548051812442747
crossref_primary_10_1111_jphs_12081
crossref_primary_10_1108_IJQSS_04_2013_0023
crossref_primary_10_1108_YC_10_2022_1625
crossref_primary_10_1080_10941665_2024_2351126
crossref_primary_10_3390_su13084207
crossref_primary_10_1108_TPM_06_2016_0027
crossref_primary_10_1108_JMP_03_2017_0115
crossref_primary_10_1108_IJOA_02_2019_1653
crossref_primary_10_1177_0020852312444854
crossref_primary_10_22495_jgr_v4_i1_p6
crossref_primary_10_1108_JGR_01_2023_0012
crossref_primary_10_1080_13678868_2016_1222486
crossref_primary_10_1002_soej_12350
crossref_primary_10_17645_mac_v8i2_2772
crossref_primary_10_3917_risa_783_0475
crossref_primary_10_1080_22243534_2018_1501957
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10869_023_09921_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_020_00854_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tourman_2018_05_011
crossref_primary_10_1108_17473611211203939
crossref_primary_10_1080_03075079_2016_1141403
crossref_primary_10_19181_4m_2021_52_2
crossref_primary_10_1142_S1363919619500452
crossref_primary_10_18394_iid_440968
crossref_primary_10_1108_IJWBR_06_2021_0033
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11192_020_03670_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ssresearch_2024_103038
crossref_primary_10_1108_PR_02_2018_0071
crossref_primary_10_4102_sajip_v43_1393
crossref_primary_10_1080_01443410_2014_895291
crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_01_2013_0027
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10551_014_2481_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10869_010_9177_2
crossref_primary_10_1108_MRR_05_2015_0118
crossref_primary_10_1108_YC_07_2019_1017
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20010492
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2016_03_014
crossref_primary_10_1080_09669582_2019_1632320
crossref_primary_10_3390_admsci13050136
crossref_primary_10_1097_TGR_0000000000000152
crossref_primary_10_48175_IJARSCT_14325
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvb_2021_103585
crossref_primary_10_1002_ca_23294
crossref_primary_10_6000_1929_4409_2020_09_161
crossref_primary_10_1080_17543266_2013_795611
crossref_primary_10_1111_caim_12243
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_paid_2022_112037
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jretconser_2017_01_010
crossref_primary_10_1108_JSIT_01_2020_0005
crossref_primary_10_1177_1056492615616692
crossref_primary_10_1111_1468_4446_12014
crossref_primary_10_1108_MD_09_2015_0387
crossref_primary_10_3390_su12114417
crossref_primary_10_1080_10439463_2015_1081388
crossref_primary_10_1080_01463373_2016_1259175
crossref_primary_10_1111_ijsa_12304
crossref_primary_10_1108_IHR_07_2020_0023
crossref_primary_10_2308_jfar_51931
crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_67_1_012027
crossref_primary_10_22495_jgr_v4_i1_c2_p6
crossref_primary_10_11118_actaun201967061627
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10551_023_05325_z
crossref_primary_10_1108_MRR_06_2017_0193
crossref_primary_10_1108_EDI_07_2016_0062
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10734_014_9825_y
crossref_primary_10_1097_01_JAA_0000435187_33277_a4
crossref_primary_10_1002_ase_1866
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10869_016_9460_y
crossref_primary_10_1108_EJM_04_2022_0267
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_techfore_2023_122801
crossref_primary_10_15388_omee_2019_10_12
crossref_primary_10_3390_su15065058
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joep_2013_07_010
crossref_primary_10_1177_0170840614550732
crossref_primary_10_3390_su10124737
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_emj_2013_12_002
crossref_primary_10_1108_IJCMA_08_2019_0124
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvb_2013_01_007
crossref_primary_10_1080_13632434_2013_869206
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10551_012_1450_z
crossref_primary_10_1108_PR_12_2022_0894
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_lindif_2011_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1080_10548408_2021_1921672
Cites_doi 10.1177/014662169501900405
10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.001
10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00044-1
10.1177/01466219922031437
10.1097/00126450-200019010-00011
10.1006/jvbe.2001.1838
10.1097/00005110-200411000-00005
10.1108/02683940810904358
10.2307/255750
10.1177/1094428104268027
10.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.003
10.1108/02683940810904367
10.1177/0013164406292036
10.1108/02683940810904385
10.1007/BF03372160
10.1002/job.147
10.1108/02683940810904376
10.3102/10769986004003207
10.1177/014662168300700208
10.1108/02683940810904394
10.1177/109442810031002
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2010 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC
Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010
Copyright_xml – notice: 2010 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC
– notice: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
0U~
1-H
3V.
7WY
7WZ
7XB
87Z
88C
88G
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8FL
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
CCPQU
DWQXO
FRNLG
FYUFA
F~G
GHDGH
GNUQQ
K60
K6~
L.-
L.0
M0C
M0T
M2M
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PSYQQ
Q9U
DOI 10.1007/s10869-010-9164-7
DatabaseName CrossRef
Global News & ABI/Inform Professional
Trade PRO
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ABI/INFORM Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)
Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Business Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Business Premium Collection (Alumni)
Health Research Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Business Collection
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ABI/INFORM Global
Healthcare Administration Database
Psychology Database
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Business (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
Trade PRO
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ABI/INFORM Complete
ProQuest Central
Global News & ABI/Inform Professional
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
Health Research Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ProQuest Central Korea
ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition)
Business Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global
ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health Management
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
ProQuest Business Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Business (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
Business Premium Collection (Alumni)
DatabaseTitleList

ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
Business
EISSN 1573-353X
EndPage 324
ExternalDocumentID 2033951261
10_1007_s10869_010_9164_7
40605789
GeographicLocations United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States--US
GroupedDBID -4V
-55
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
06D
0R~
0VY
199
1N0
203
29K
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2LR
2VQ
2~H
30V
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5GY
5VS
67Z
6NX
78A
7WY
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FL
8TC
8UJ
8VB
95-
95.
95~
96X
AABHQ
AACDK
AAHCP
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJBT
AAJKR
AANZL
AARHV
AARTL
AASML
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
AAYZH
ABAKF
ABBBX
ABBHK
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABECW
ABFTD
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABKVW
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABQSL
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTHY
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ABXSQ
ABYRZ
ABYYQ
ACAOD
ACBXY
ACDTI
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACNCT
ACNXV
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACREN
ACSNA
ACUHF
ACVFL
ACXJH
ACZOJ
ADACV
ADBBV
ADGDI
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADMHG
ADPTO
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADULT
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADYOE
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFQL
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AEMSY
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AETLH
AEUPB
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFGCZ
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFYQB
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAJD
AHBYD
AHEXP
AHKAY
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIGIU
AIIXL
AILAN
AITGF
AJBLW
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKVCP
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMTXH
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
APTMU
AQUVI
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AYQZM
AZFZN
AZQEC
AZRUE
B-.
BA0
BAPOH
BDATZ
BENPR
BEZIV
BGNMA
BHNFS
BPHCQ
BSONS
BVXVI
CAG
CBXGM
CCPQU
CHNMF
COF
CS3
CSCUP
D-I
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
DWQXO
EBLON
EBO
EBS
EBU
EHE
EIOEI
EJD
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRNLG
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNUQQ
GNWQR
GPZZG
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH
GXS
HECYW
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IJ-
IKXTQ
IPSME
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JAAYA
JAB
JBMMH
JBSCW
JBU
JCJTX
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLEZI
JLXEF
JPL
JPPEU
JSODD
JST
JZLTJ
K1G
K60
K6~
KDC
KOV
LAK
LLZTM
M0C
M0T
M2M
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
NB0
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
P19
P2P
P9L
PF-
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSYQQ
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QF4
QM6
QN7
QOK
QOS
QWB
R-Y
R89
R9I
RHV
RNS
ROL
RPX
RSV
S16
S27
S3B
SA0
SAP
SBS
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SZN
T13
TAE
TH9
TSG
TSK
TSV
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WIP
WK8
YLTOR
Z45
Z7X
Z81
Z83
Z86
Z88
Z8U
Z8W
Z92
ZCA
ZL0
ZMTXR
ZMU
ZOVNA
~8M
~A9
~EX
1SB
2.D
28-
2P1
5QI
8H~
AABYN
AAFGU
AANQY
AAYFA
ABFGW
ABKAS
ABPTK
ACBMV
ACBRV
ACBYP
ACDPM
ACIGE
ACIPQ
ACTTH
ACVWB
ACWMK
ACYUM
ADMDM
ADMHP
ADOXG
AEEQQ
AEFIE
AEFTE
AESTI
AEVTX
AFEXP
AFFNX
AFNRJ
AGGBP
AGGDS
AHAVH
AIMYW
AJDOV
AKQUC
AQQCX
BBWZM
CWXUR
CZBKB
IHE
IRVIT
KOW
NDZJH
O-J
OVD
R4E
RNI
RZC
RZD
RZK
S1Z
S26
S28
SBU
SCLPG
T16
TEORI
UNUBA
WK6
Z5O
Z7R
Z7Y
Z8M
Z8S
AAEOY
AAYXX
AFQWV
CITATION
H13
0U~
1-H
7XB
8FK
L.-
L.0
PQEST
PQUKI
Q9U
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-a93c676a2ada8b44f5bcce3dbd4801072de90c59f22535b2ec28458d0a73de043
IEDL.DBID BENPR
ISSN 0889-3268
IngestDate Thu Dec 05 17:02:12 EST 2024
Fri Dec 06 01:00:05 EST 2024
Sat Dec 16 12:03:55 EST 2023
Tue Dec 10 22:55:04 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Millennials
Generational cohorts
Baby Boomers
Work ethic
Generation X
Language English
License http://www.springer.com/tdm
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c368t-a93c676a2ada8b44f5bcce3dbd4801072de90c59f22535b2ec28458d0a73de043
PQID 196901719
PQPubID 38113
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_journals_196901719
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10869_010_9164_7
springer_journals_10_1007_s10869_010_9164_7
jstor_primary_40605789
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2010-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2010
  text: 2010-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Boston
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Boston
– name: New York
PublicationTitle Journal of business and psychology
PublicationTitleAbbrev J Bus Psychol
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher Springer Science + Business Media, Inc
Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – sequence: 0
  name: Springer Science + Business Media, Inc
– sequence: 0
  name: Springer Nature B.V
– name: Springer US
References PogsonCCoberADoverspikeDRogersJDifferences in self-reported work ethic across three career stagesJournal of Vocational Behavior20036218920110.1016/S0001-8791(02)00044-1
Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a pattern of graded scores [Monograph]. Psychometrika Supplement No. 17.
BakerFEQUATE 2.1: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory (version 2.1)1995MadisonLaboratory of Experimental Design, University of Wisconsin
MeriacJPPolingTLWoehrDJAre there gender differences in work ethic?: An examination of the measurement equivalence of the multidimensional work ethic profilePersonality and Individual Differences20094720921310.1016/j.paid.2009.03.001
Weber, M. (1958). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York, NY: Scribners. (Original work published 1904–1905).
DriesNPepermansRDe KerpelEExploring four generations’ beliefs about career: Is “satisfied” the new “successful”?Journal of Managerial Psychology20082390792810.1108/02683940810904394
FlowersCPOshimaTCRajuNSA description and demonstration of the polytomous-DFIT frameworkApplied Psychological Measurement19992330932610.1177/01466219922031437
RajuNSvan der LindenWFleerPAn IRT-based internal measure of test bias with implications for differential item functioningApplied Psychological Measurement19951935336810.1177/014662169501900405
SmolaKWSuttonCDGenerational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millenniumJournal of Organizational Behavior20022336338210.1002/job.147
KupperschmidtBMultigeneration employees: Strategies for effective managementHealth Care Manager200019657611183655
O’Connell, P. O. (2008, August 25). What’s eating gen X. Business Week, pp. 61–62.
ThissenDMULTILOG 7.03: A computer program for multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory2003ChicagoScientific Software, Inc.
RajuNSDFITPS6: A Fortran program for calculating polytomous DIF/DTF [Computer program]1999ChicagoIllinois Institute of Technology
LancasterLCStillmanDWhen generations collide: Who they are. Why they clash. How to solve the generational puzzle at work2002New York, NYHarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
TwengeJMCampbellSMGenerational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplaceJournal of Managerial Psychology20082386287710.1108/02683940810904367
VandenbergRJLanceCEA review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational researchOrganizational Research Methods2000346910.1177/109442810031002
ZemkeRRainesCFilipczakBGenerations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, xers and nexters in your workplace1999New York, NYAmacom
MeadeAWLautenschlagerGJA comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invarianceOrganizational Research Methods2004736138810.1177/1094428104268027
ZickarMBroadfootALanceCEVandenbergRJThe partial revival of a dead horse? Comparing classical test theory and item response theoryStatistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences2009New York, NYRoutledge3759
CennamoLGardnerDGenerational differences in work values, outcomes, and person-organization values fitJournal of Managerial Psychology20082389190610.1108/02683940810904385
EmbretsonSEReiseSPItem response theory for psychologists2000Mahwah, NJLawrence Erlbaum and Associates
MackyKGardnerDForsythSGenerational differences at work: Introduction and overviewJournal of Managerial Psychology20082385786110.1108/02683940810904358
MillerMJWoehrDJHudspethNThe meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventoryJournal of Vocational Behavior20026045148910.1006/jvbe.2001.1838
ReckaseMDUnifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implicationsJournal of Educational Statistics1979420723010.2307/1164671
WongMGardinerELangWCoulonLGenerational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace?Journal of Managerial Psychology20082387889010.1108/02683940810904376
WoehrDJArchinegaLLimDExamining work ethic across populations: A comparison of the multidimensional work ethic profile across three diverse culturesEducational and Psychological Measurement20076715416810.1177/0013164406292036
ter BogtTRaaijmakersQvan WelFSocialization and development of the work ethic among adolescents and young adultsJournal of Vocational Behavior20056642043710.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.003
CherringtonDJCondieSJEnglandJLAge and work valuesAcademy of Management Journal19792261762310.2307/255750
DuchscherJEBCowinLMultigenerational nurses in the workplaceJournal of Nursing Administration20043449350110.1097/00005110-200411000-00005
StockingMLLordFMDeveloping a common metric in item response theoryApplied Psychological Measurement1983720121010.1177/014662168300700208
Erickson, T. (2008, August 25). Don’t treat them like baby boomers. Business Week, p. 64.
Pham, V. H., Case, J., Miyake, L., & Gil, S. (2008). The gen Y perceptions study. Retrieved from Cal State Fullerton Career Center website http://campusapps2.fullerton.edu/career/pdf/Gen_Y.pdf.
R Zemke (9164_CR35) 1999
M Wong (9164_CR34) 2008; 23
SE Embretson (9164_CR9) 2000
JEB Duchscher (9164_CR8) 2004; 34
9164_CR24
KW Smola (9164_CR25) 2002; 23
JM Twenge (9164_CR30) 2008; 23
DJ Cherrington (9164_CR3) 1979; 22
ML Stocking (9164_CR26) 1983; 7
N Dries (9164_CR7) 2008; 23
LC Lancaster (9164_CR13) 2002
M Zickar (9164_CR36) 2009
NS Raju (9164_CR22) 1995; 19
MD Reckase (9164_CR23) 1979; 4
F Baker (9164_CR1) 1995
9164_CR19
L Cennamo (9164_CR2) 2008; 23
CP Flowers (9164_CR11) 1999; 23
JP Meriac (9164_CR16) 2009; 47
9164_CR18
NS Raju (9164_CR21) 1999
9164_CR10
K Macky (9164_CR14) 2008; 23
9164_CR32
T ter Bogt (9164_CR28) 2005; 66
DJ Woehr (9164_CR33) 2007; 67
AW Meade (9164_CR15) 2004; 7
RJ Vandenberg (9164_CR31) 2000; 3
B Kupperschmidt (9164_CR12) 2000; 19
C Pogson (9164_CR20) 2003; 62
D Thissen (9164_CR29) 2003
MJ Miller (9164_CR17) 2002; 60
References_xml – start-page: 37
  volume-title: Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences
  year: 2009
  ident: 9164_CR36
  contributor:
    fullname: M Zickar
– volume-title: EQUATE 2.1: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory (version 2.1)
  year: 1995
  ident: 9164_CR1
  contributor:
    fullname: F Baker
– volume-title: Item response theory for psychologists
  year: 2000
  ident: 9164_CR9
  contributor:
    fullname: SE Embretson
– volume: 19
  start-page: 353
  year: 1995
  ident: 9164_CR22
  publication-title: Applied Psychological Measurement
  doi: 10.1177/014662169501900405
  contributor:
    fullname: NS Raju
– volume: 47
  start-page: 209
  year: 2009
  ident: 9164_CR16
  publication-title: Personality and Individual Differences
  doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2009.03.001
  contributor:
    fullname: JP Meriac
– volume-title: MULTILOG 7.03: A computer program for multiple, categorical item analysis and test scoring using item response theory
  year: 2003
  ident: 9164_CR29
  contributor:
    fullname: D Thissen
– volume: 62
  start-page: 189
  year: 2003
  ident: 9164_CR20
  publication-title: Journal of Vocational Behavior
  doi: 10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00044-1
  contributor:
    fullname: C Pogson
– volume: 23
  start-page: 309
  year: 1999
  ident: 9164_CR11
  publication-title: Applied Psychological Measurement
  doi: 10.1177/01466219922031437
  contributor:
    fullname: CP Flowers
– volume: 19
  start-page: 65
  year: 2000
  ident: 9164_CR12
  publication-title: Health Care Manager
  doi: 10.1097/00126450-200019010-00011
  contributor:
    fullname: B Kupperschmidt
– volume: 60
  start-page: 451
  year: 2002
  ident: 9164_CR17
  publication-title: Journal of Vocational Behavior
  doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1838
  contributor:
    fullname: MJ Miller
– volume: 34
  start-page: 493
  year: 2004
  ident: 9164_CR8
  publication-title: Journal of Nursing Administration
  doi: 10.1097/00005110-200411000-00005
  contributor:
    fullname: JEB Duchscher
– volume: 23
  start-page: 857
  year: 2008
  ident: 9164_CR14
  publication-title: Journal of Managerial Psychology
  doi: 10.1108/02683940810904358
  contributor:
    fullname: K Macky
– ident: 9164_CR19
– ident: 9164_CR32
– volume-title: When generations collide: Who they are. Why they clash. How to solve the generational puzzle at work
  year: 2002
  ident: 9164_CR13
  contributor:
    fullname: LC Lancaster
– volume: 22
  start-page: 617
  year: 1979
  ident: 9164_CR3
  publication-title: Academy of Management Journal
  doi: 10.2307/255750
  contributor:
    fullname: DJ Cherrington
– volume: 7
  start-page: 361
  year: 2004
  ident: 9164_CR15
  publication-title: Organizational Research Methods
  doi: 10.1177/1094428104268027
  contributor:
    fullname: AW Meade
– volume: 66
  start-page: 420
  year: 2005
  ident: 9164_CR28
  publication-title: Journal of Vocational Behavior
  doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2003.12.003
  contributor:
    fullname: T ter Bogt
– volume-title: Generations at work: Managing the clash of veterans, boomers, xers and nexters in your workplace
  year: 1999
  ident: 9164_CR35
  contributor:
    fullname: R Zemke
– volume: 23
  start-page: 862
  year: 2008
  ident: 9164_CR30
  publication-title: Journal of Managerial Psychology
  doi: 10.1108/02683940810904367
  contributor:
    fullname: JM Twenge
– volume: 67
  start-page: 154
  year: 2007
  ident: 9164_CR33
  publication-title: Educational and Psychological Measurement
  doi: 10.1177/0013164406292036
  contributor:
    fullname: DJ Woehr
– volume: 23
  start-page: 891
  year: 2008
  ident: 9164_CR2
  publication-title: Journal of Managerial Psychology
  doi: 10.1108/02683940810904385
  contributor:
    fullname: L Cennamo
– ident: 9164_CR24
  doi: 10.1007/BF03372160
– volume: 23
  start-page: 363
  year: 2002
  ident: 9164_CR25
  publication-title: Journal of Organizational Behavior
  doi: 10.1002/job.147
  contributor:
    fullname: KW Smola
– volume: 23
  start-page: 878
  year: 2008
  ident: 9164_CR34
  publication-title: Journal of Managerial Psychology
  doi: 10.1108/02683940810904376
  contributor:
    fullname: M Wong
– volume: 4
  start-page: 207
  year: 1979
  ident: 9164_CR23
  publication-title: Journal of Educational Statistics
  doi: 10.3102/10769986004003207
  contributor:
    fullname: MD Reckase
– volume: 7
  start-page: 201
  year: 1983
  ident: 9164_CR26
  publication-title: Applied Psychological Measurement
  doi: 10.1177/014662168300700208
  contributor:
    fullname: ML Stocking
– volume: 23
  start-page: 907
  year: 2008
  ident: 9164_CR7
  publication-title: Journal of Managerial Psychology
  doi: 10.1108/02683940810904394
  contributor:
    fullname: N Dries
– ident: 9164_CR10
– volume: 3
  start-page: 4
  year: 2000
  ident: 9164_CR31
  publication-title: Organizational Research Methods
  doi: 10.1177/109442810031002
  contributor:
    fullname: RJ Vandenberg
– ident: 9164_CR18
– volume-title: DFITPS6: A Fortran program for calculating polytomous DIF/DTF [Computer program]
  year: 1999
  ident: 9164_CR21
  contributor:
    fullname: NS Raju
SSID ssj0005160
Score 2.3585484
Snippet Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions...
Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions...
The purpose of this study was to examine the differences across three generational cohorts (Millennials, Generation X, and Baby Boomers) on dimensions of the...
SourceID proquest
crossref
springer
jstor
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 315
SubjectTerms Age
Age differences
Attitudes
Baby Boom generation
Baby boomers
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Business and Management
Careers
Community and Environmental Psychology
Differences
Generation X
Generational differences
Gratification
Industrial and Organizational Psychology
Item response theory
Millennial generation
Millennials
Occupational psychology
Personality and Social Psychology
Psychological aspects
Psychology
Recreation
Social generations
Social Sciences
Studies
Values
Work ethic
Workplaces
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: SpringerLINK - Czech Republic Consortium
  dbid: AGYKE
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3JTsMwEB1BKyEuLAVEKSAfOIFcmcSJHW5VKVSgcqJSOUW24wiElLK0EvD1jLO0ZTtwthMrnvHMy_j5GeBImigUmknKExVQrlNJVWAE5ZHytGAa_4lcvWNwE_aH_GoUjJbAm5Uussd2tSOZB-qFs24ydNQehusz5FQsQx1Tj1uM9c7l3XVvTuw4zc8G5_wdBCey2sv87SVfslFBSPwCNb_tjuZJ52K9OAj4mmsVOq7JY3s60W3z8VPJ8R_fswFrJQYlncJpNmHJZg1YqSjwDVidRcX3LUgLYeqiZEjOy_tUMLqQh4y4UjvJKfNnpJOR3ptyzBrXl4xTMpjXH0nvefqATu2eJJ18MsgtupEl3fG927TYhuFF77bbp-XlDNT4oZxQFfkmFKHyVKKk5jwNtDHWT3TiBGmY8BIbMRNEKQYMP9CeNZgIA5kwJfzEMu7vQC0bZ3YXiI-_TDbCsBzYlDvEKlnKuD61CO0sU6YJx5WR4qdCgyOeqy27aYxxxNhNYyyasJObcdYTEQtiUhk1oVXZNS7X6WvsxIGcYhC2nlRmWmj9a5C9f_VuwWrBOXC1m32oTV6m9gChzEQflr77CUQx6HQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Generational Differences in Work Ethic: An Examination of Measurement Equivalence Across Three Cohorts
URI https://www.jstor.org/stable/40605789
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10869-010-9164-7
https://www.proquest.com/docview/196901719
Volume 25
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3dS8MwED_cBuKL-DWcHyMPPinBrE3b1BfptFMUh4gDfSpJmuJeuk0n6H9vrh-bCvrUhyZNuUsuv9z9cgdwJHToB4oJylPpUa4yQaWnA8pD6aiAKXsmQn_H3dC_HvGbJ--p4ua8VbTK2iYWhjqdaPSRn2IaF8ztEp5PZxSLRmFwtaqg0YCW03OFaEKrHw_vH5Ycj15xTbig8licIuqwZnl3TvhIFWJ2vfucBj82ppKb-AN1_gqUFvvPYAPWK-BIolLTm7Bi8i1YrXnrW7C2MGWf25CV2aRLPx-5rIqgWJNAxjlB_zgpeO5nJMpJ_CGRDoNtySQjd0unIYln72M7E7EniYrfJo9W94ZcTF4w0rADo0H8eHFNq4oKVLu-mFMZutoPfOnIVArFeeYprY2bqhSzyLDASU3ItBdmdpW7nnKMtruXJ1ImAzc1jLttaOaT3OwCce05x4TWlnom4wgzBcsYVz1j8ZhhUnfguBZnMi0TZyTLFMko-8SOmKDsk6AD7ULgi5YWZlggKcIO7NcaSKrF9ZYspkIHTmqlfHv71yB7_35rH9ZKYgA6WA6gOX99N4cWb8xVF1rRoN8f4vPq-TbuVrOsC42RE30BaXHVAA
link.rule.ids 314,780,784,21388,27924,27925,33744,41081,41523,42150,42592,43805,52111,52234,74302
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT8MwDLZgSLALggFiPHPgBIoIa9KmXNCATQO2CaEhcauSNBW7dMA2Cf49cR8bQ4Jz06ayHeeL_cUGOJEm9APNJOWxEpTrRFIlTEB5qBo6YNqdiTDe0ev7nWd-_yJeCm7OuKBVlj4xc9TxyGCM_BzLuGBtl_Dq7Z1i0yhMrhYdNJZhBQuniwqsXLf6j09zjsdFdk04o_I4nCLLtGZ-d076SBVibr37nAYLG1POTVxAnb8Spdn-096A9QI4kmau6U1YsmkNVkveeg2qM1f2tQVJXk06j_OR26IJinMJZJgSjI-TjOd-SZopaX0qpMPgWDJKSG8eNCSt9-nQWSK-SZrZb5OB070lN6NXzDRsw3O7Nbjp0KKjAjWeLydUhZ7xA181VKyk5jwR2hjrxTrGKjIsaMQ2ZEaEiVvlntANa9zuJWTMVODFlnFvByrpKLW7QDx3zrGh86XCJhxhpmQJ4_rCOjxmmTJ1OC3FGb3lhTOieYlklH3kZoxQ9lFQh51M4LORDmY4ICnDOuyXGoiKxTWOZqZQh7NSKT-e_jXJ3r_fOoa1zqDXjbp3_Yd9qOYkAQy2HEBl8jG1hw57TPRRYWHfL6PT7w
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT8MwDLZgSIgL4inGMwdOoIjQpm3KBQ3YxHNCCCRuVZKmYpeOx5Dg32O36QZIcG7aVI5jf7G_2AC7yqZxYoTiMtcRl6ZQXEc24TLVgUmEwTMRxTtu-vH5g7x8jB59SaE3T6tsbGJlqPOhpRj5AZVxodou6UHhWRG3Z73j5xdODaQo0eq7aUzDDDpFEbRg5qTbv72b8D0OqyvDFa0HMYtqUpz1PToVE21I4N6PJU9-OKmap_gDgf5Kmla-qLcA8x5Esk696osw5colmG047EswNzZrn8tQ1JWl65gfO_MNUdA8sEHJKFbOKs77EeuUrPuhiRpDY9mwYDeTACLrvrwPUCvpTdapfpvdox44djp8oqzDCjz0uven59x3V-A2jNWI6zS0cRLrQOdaGSmLyFjrwtzkVFFGJEHuUmGjtMAdH0YmcBY9WaRyoZMwd0KGq9Aqh6VbAxbimcelaFcjV0iCnEoUQppDh9jMCW3bsNeIM3uui2hkk3LJJPsMZ8xI9lnShtVK4OORCDkQVKq0DRvNCmR-o71lY7Vow36zKN-e_jXJ-r_f2oFZVK7s-qJ_tQFzNV-A4i6b0Bq9vrsthCEjs-0V7Ask0dgc
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Generational+Differences+in+Work+Ethic%3A+An+Examination+of+Measurement+Equivalence+Across+Three+Cohorts&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+business+and+psychology&rft.au=Meriac%2C+John+P.&rft.au=Woehr%2C+David+J.&rft.au=Banister%2C+Christina&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.pub=Springer+Science+%2B+Business+Media%2C+Inc&rft.issn=0889-3268&rft.eissn=1573-353X&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=315&rft.epage=324&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs10869-010-9164-7&rft.externalDocID=40605789
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0889-3268&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0889-3268&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0889-3268&client=summon