Knowing what you don’t know: a tertiary study on knowledge management

• Published in: Journal of knowledge management Vol. 27; no. 9; pp. 2548 - 2578
• Main Authors: Cerchione, Roberto, Centobelli, Piera, Oropallo, Eugenio, Magni, Domitilla, Borin, Elena
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kempston Emerald Publishing Limited 20.10.2023; Emerald Group Publishing Limited
• Subjects: Bibliometrics; Clusters; Cocitation; COVID-19; Evolution; Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Literature reviews; Medical research; Research methodology; Small & medium sized enterprises-SME; State-of-the-art reviews; Taxonomy; Trends; Work environment; Tertiary literature review; Knowledge management; Tertiary review methodology; Tertiary study
• ISSN: 1367-3270; 1758-7484; 1367-3270
• DOI: 10.1108/JKM-07-2022-0589

Purpose This paper aims to conduct a tertiary review to analyse the state of the art of literature reviews on knowledge management (KM) published in academic journals and provide an overview of their evolution. From 2000 to 2022, about 500 reviews have been published in the KM field, with most systematic studies compared to bibliometric or meta-analytic studies, and an absence of previous tertiary studies. Therefore, given the lack of previous tertiary research, this paper provides a complete picture of the evolution of review topics in the past and presents implications for both researchers and practitioners. Design/methodology/approach A classification scheme was defined to cluster and evaluate the literature reviews, both in terms of methodological approach and content. Regarding the content, the various secondary papers were classified according to the purpose of the research (state of the art, taxonomy, research agenda and research framework), the unit of analysis (small and medium enterprise, large company, start-up and university), the KM models adopted and the thematic areas addressed. Furthermore, a tertiary review methodology was identified integrating two main approaches: a bibliometric approach for cluster identification and a systematic approach for the discussion. Findings Two categories of contributions emerge from the results: those concerning research topics that have found a continuous interest over time and those that have not yet found a constant research interest. This latter aspect is relevant to help researchers conduct future literature analysis in KM research to bridge existing research gaps. Research limitations/implications This paper provides a unique compendium of search directions to offer a comprehensive overview of the scientific debate about KM. This overview can also be used as a managerial panacea to identify best KM practice guidelines from existing reviews. Originality/value This is a unique attempt to conduct a tertiary study on KM for more than two decades by providing insights into the structural body of knowledge through academic progress in the subject of KM. Thus, this study expands the field of KM and provides original approaches for research in the field.