Resisting scientific extractivism: A post-extractivist policy of knowledge production with marginalised communities

This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups are subalternised, i.e. reduced to raw data appropriated by academics. What has been captured and assimilated is then largely reinjected int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGateways (Sydney, N.S.W.) Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 1 - 14
Main Author Godrie, Baptiste
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sydney UTS ePress 01.01.2025
UTS ePRESS
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1836-3393
1836-3393
DOI10.5130/ijcre.v18i1.9326

Cover

Abstract This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups are subalternised, i.e. reduced to raw data appropriated by academics. What has been captured and assimilated is then largely reinjected into closed circuits operating essentially between academics, from which marginalised communities are largely excluded. Ultimately, extractivism produces scientific careers and minefields; it confers disproportionate benefits to academics and little or no benefit on communities in material support, intellectual credit, or contribution to social struggles, which May lead them to turn away from academia.
AbstractList This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups are subalternised, i.e. reduced to raw data appropriated by academics. What has been captured and assimilated is then largely reinjected into closed circuits operating essentially between academics, from which marginalised communities are largely excluded. Ultimately, extractivism produces scientific careers and minefields; it confers disproportionate benefits to academics and little or no benefit on communities in material support, intellectual credit, or contribution to social struggles, which May lead them to turn away from academia.
This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups are subalternised, i.e. reduced to raw data appropriated by academics. What has been captured and assimilated is then largely reinjected into closed circuits operating essentially between academics, from which marginalised communities are largely excluded. Ultimately, extractivism produces scientific careers and minefields; it confers disproportionate benefits to academics and little or no benefit on communities in material support, intellectual credit, or contribution to social struggles, which may lead them to turn away from academia. This analysis then raises the importance of developing post-extractivist approaches in the social sciences, based on an ethics of knowledge production rooted in the concepts of epistemic justice, reciprocity and accountability. I introduce a set of post-extractivist research postures and practices: clarifying and negotiating expectations of research projects; promoting a relational ethics on issues of epistemic and social justice in the production of knowledge with communities; countering the subalternisation of knowledge by reconsidering the teaching of qualitative methodologies in the social sciences; valuing reciprocity and accountability towards communities; and reconsidering the logic of careers and the functioning of our academic institutions. This analysis is based on pioneering work on this subject, particularly in a context of the relationship between the Global North and the Global South, such as those of Rivera Cusicanqui (2010), Tuhiwai Smith (2012), Betasamosake Simpson (Klein 2013), Gudynas (2013) or Grosfoguel (2016a, 2016b). They are also informed by my experience in participatory research with community-based organisations that work with marginalised communities in the field of the fight against poverty, homelessness and mental health in Quebec (Canada).
This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups are subalternised, i.e. reduced to raw data appropriated by academics. What has been captured and assimilated is then largely reinjected into closed circuits operating essentially between academics, from which marginalised communities are largely excluded. Ultimately, extractivism produces scientific careers and minefields; it confers disproportionate benefits to academics and little or no benefit on communities in material support, intellectual credit, or contribution to social struggles, which may lead them to turn away from academia. This analysis then raises the importance of developing post-extractivist approaches in the social sciences, based on an ethics of knowledge production rooted in the concepts of epistemic justice, reciprocity and accountability. I introduce a set of post-extractivist research postures and practices: clarifying and negotiating expectations of research projects; promoting a relational ethics on issues of epistemic and social justice in the production of knowledge with communities; countering the subalternisation of knowledge by reconsidering the teaching of qualitative methodologies in the social sciences; valuing reciprocity and accountability towards communities; and reconsidering the logic of careers and the functioning of our academic institutions. This analysis is based on pioneering work on this subject, particularly in a context of the relationship between the Global North and the Global South, such as those of Rivera Cusicanqui (2010), Tuhiwai Smith (2012), Betasamosake Simpson (Klein 2013), Gudynas (2013) or Grosfoguel (2016a, 2016b). They are also informed by my experience in participatory research with community-based organisations that work with marginalised communities in the field of the fight against poverty, homelessness and mental health in Quebec (Canada).
Author Baptiste Godrie
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Baptiste
  surname: Godrie
  fullname: Godrie, Baptiste
BookMark eNpNkUFr3DAQhU1JoWmae4_6A95KnrUt9RZCmwYChZCehSyNtrO1pUVSkubfR-stJXPR8HjvMej72JyFGLBpPgu-6QXwL7S3CTdPQpLYKOiGd825kDC0AArO3uwfmsuc97wOKAXDeN7ke8yUC4Udy5YwFPJkGf4tydhCT5SXr-yKHWIu7RuxVGUm-8KiZ39CfJ7R7ZAdUnSP1RADe6bymy0m7SiYmTI6ZuOyPAYqhPlT896bOePlv_ei-fX928P1j_bu583t9dVda2GQpQXlrOd8nPyIHEYvJyMt2okrmEYnxeCqbxS-l84ZC6rjnTNbgaLrpl5KDxfN7anXRbPXh0T1oBcdDelViGmnTSpkZ9TOWmfcJI3xuJ3kpEbsnNj2VoAXBlXt4qcum2LOCf3_PsH1kYFeGeiVgT4yqJGbUyQtVLSN84zr5-S9KfkYAxCDpuDjaij1_p53YjziGRQXUoHsq8jhFQ30mO4
ContentType Journal Article
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.5130/ijcre.v18i1.9326
DatabaseName CrossRef
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList

CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Education
EISSN 1836-3393
EndPage 14
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_dccdadb8aafe4b8b97e2d145c13f1ae9
10_5130_ijcre_v18i1_9326
10.3316/informit.T2025021700006901893852020
Genre Research articles (Peer reviewed)
GroupedDBID 29H
5VS
AAFWJ
ABDBF
ACGFO
ACUHS
ADBBV
AFPKN
AIAGR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
EAP
ESX
GROUPED_DOAJ
KEL
KQ8
M~E
OK1
P2P
TR2
TUS
AAYXX
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-39dcf007bf7e037f8ba8cecb093b7d816dc3671f58ddac39202da41e122b588f3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1836-3393
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:31:30 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:39:44 EDT 2025
Sun Feb 23 12:20:11 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c368t-39dcf007bf7e037f8ba8cecb093b7d816dc3671f58ddac39202da41e122b588f3
Notes Gateways, Vol. 18, No. 1, June 2025, 1-14
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/dccdadb8aafe4b8b97e2d145c13f1ae9
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dccdadb8aafe4b8b97e2d145c13f1ae9
crossref_primary_10_5130_ijcre_v18i1_9326
rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_t2025021700006901893852020
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Sydney
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Sydney
PublicationTitle Gateways (Sydney, N.S.W.)
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher UTS ePress
UTS ePRESS
Publisher_xml – name: UTS ePress
– name: UTS ePRESS
SSID ssj0000399367
Score 2.2783546
Snippet This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups...
SourceID doaj
crossref
rmit
SourceType Open Website
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1
SubjectTerms accountability
Communities
epistemic justice
Evaluation
marginalized communities
Methodology
post-extractivist knowledge policy
relational ethics
Responsibility
Scientific extractivism
Social groups
Title Resisting scientific extractivism: A post-extractivist policy of knowledge production with marginalised communities
URI http://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.T2025021700006901893852020
https://doaj.org/article/dccdadb8aafe4b8b97e2d145c13f1ae9
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV09T-QwELUQ19Ag7gCxcCAXNBSB-Ct2qNi9Y4UoKBBIdJY_0SKRXZFAwa_HY--hpaK5LrIs23oTe16cmTcIHRvBmeFWVTEyUfHEqSvVOFfRkNxnGymJJUD2prm659cP4mGl1BfEhBV54ALcmXfOG2-VMTGkMW0rA_WEC0dYJCbk1L26rVc-pvIZDH63keW_pEjn9NnsKbGw0zeiZuQUOMsXP5Tl-r_k0Gf3Mt1Cm0teiMdlPT_RWuh-QUnlZfjFNupvQw_7sXvEJYkRYnxwOlpzmtPbrH8-x2O8mPdDtdI44EUW_sXziD-vz_CiyLymcTHcw-Jn85KrY83eg8eupIyA0OoOup9e3v25qpYVEyrHGjVUrPUuJq9voww1k1FZo1xwtm6ZlV6Rxqd-kkShvDcuUaOaesNJIJRaoVRku2i9m3dhD2EG8U-qpUbKhkt4qr2KLRVRCu54M0In__DTiyKModMHBWCtM9Y6Y60B6xGaAMCf_UDSOjckQ-ulofV3hh6hCzCPhv2Ro9S6_skMPUzKGGl0EZpNHQYKvI6C8GDWYSaJkimRGuv9_7GOA7QBE5RrmN9ofXh5DYeJmAz2CP0YT_5Opkf5XfwAttznQA
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resisting+scientific+extractivism%3A+A+post-extractivist+policy+of+knowledge+production+with+marginalised+communities&rft.jtitle=Gateways+%28Sydney%2C+N.S.W.%29&rft.au=Baptiste+Godrie&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.pub=UTS+ePress&rft.eissn=1836-3393&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft_id=info:doi/10.5130%2Fijcre.v18i1.9326&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10.3316%2Finformit.T2025021700006901893852020
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1836-3393&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1836-3393&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1836-3393&client=summon