Resisting scientific extractivism: A post-extractivist policy of knowledge production with marginalised communities
This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups are subalternised, i.e. reduced to raw data appropriated by academics. What has been captured and assimilated is then largely reinjected int...
Saved in:
Published in | Gateways (Sydney, N.S.W.) Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 1 - 14 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Sydney
UTS ePress
01.01.2025
UTS ePRESS |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1836-3393 1836-3393 |
DOI | 10.5130/ijcre.v18i1.9326 |
Cover
Abstract | This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups are subalternised, i.e. reduced to raw data appropriated by academics. What has been captured and assimilated is then largely reinjected into closed circuits operating essentially between academics, from which marginalised communities are largely excluded. Ultimately, extractivism produces scientific careers and minefields; it confers disproportionate benefits to academics and little or no benefit on communities in material support, intellectual credit, or contribution to social struggles, which May lead them to turn away from academia. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups are subalternised, i.e. reduced to raw data appropriated by academics. What has been captured and assimilated is then largely reinjected into closed circuits operating essentially between academics, from which marginalised communities are largely excluded. Ultimately, extractivism produces scientific careers and minefields; it confers disproportionate benefits to academics and little or no benefit on communities in material support, intellectual credit, or contribution to social struggles, which May lead them to turn away from academia. This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups are subalternised, i.e. reduced to raw data appropriated by academics. What has been captured and assimilated is then largely reinjected into closed circuits operating essentially between academics, from which marginalised communities are largely excluded. Ultimately, extractivism produces scientific careers and minefields; it confers disproportionate benefits to academics and little or no benefit on communities in material support, intellectual credit, or contribution to social struggles, which may lead them to turn away from academia. This analysis then raises the importance of developing post-extractivist approaches in the social sciences, based on an ethics of knowledge production rooted in the concepts of epistemic justice, reciprocity and accountability. I introduce a set of post-extractivist research postures and practices: clarifying and negotiating expectations of research projects; promoting a relational ethics on issues of epistemic and social justice in the production of knowledge with communities; countering the subalternisation of knowledge by reconsidering the teaching of qualitative methodologies in the social sciences; valuing reciprocity and accountability towards communities; and reconsidering the logic of careers and the functioning of our academic institutions. This analysis is based on pioneering work on this subject, particularly in a context of the relationship between the Global North and the Global South, such as those of Rivera Cusicanqui (2010), Tuhiwai Smith (2012), Betasamosake Simpson (Klein 2013), Gudynas (2013) or Grosfoguel (2016a, 2016b). They are also informed by my experience in participatory research with community-based organisations that work with marginalised communities in the field of the fight against poverty, homelessness and mental health in Quebec (Canada). This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups are subalternised, i.e. reduced to raw data appropriated by academics. What has been captured and assimilated is then largely reinjected into closed circuits operating essentially between academics, from which marginalised communities are largely excluded. Ultimately, extractivism produces scientific careers and minefields; it confers disproportionate benefits to academics and little or no benefit on communities in material support, intellectual credit, or contribution to social struggles, which may lead them to turn away from academia. This analysis then raises the importance of developing post-extractivist approaches in the social sciences, based on an ethics of knowledge production rooted in the concepts of epistemic justice, reciprocity and accountability. I introduce a set of post-extractivist research postures and practices: clarifying and negotiating expectations of research projects; promoting a relational ethics on issues of epistemic and social justice in the production of knowledge with communities; countering the subalternisation of knowledge by reconsidering the teaching of qualitative methodologies in the social sciences; valuing reciprocity and accountability towards communities; and reconsidering the logic of careers and the functioning of our academic institutions. This analysis is based on pioneering work on this subject, particularly in a context of the relationship between the Global North and the Global South, such as those of Rivera Cusicanqui (2010), Tuhiwai Smith (2012), Betasamosake Simpson (Klein 2013), Gudynas (2013) or Grosfoguel (2016a, 2016b). They are also informed by my experience in participatory research with community-based organisations that work with marginalised communities in the field of the fight against poverty, homelessness and mental health in Quebec (Canada). |
Author | Baptiste Godrie |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Baptiste surname: Godrie fullname: Godrie, Baptiste |
BookMark | eNpNkUFr3DAQhU1JoWmae4_6A95KnrUt9RZCmwYChZCehSyNtrO1pUVSkubfR-stJXPR8HjvMej72JyFGLBpPgu-6QXwL7S3CTdPQpLYKOiGd825kDC0AArO3uwfmsuc97wOKAXDeN7ke8yUC4Udy5YwFPJkGf4tydhCT5SXr-yKHWIu7RuxVGUm-8KiZ39CfJ7R7ZAdUnSP1RADe6bymy0m7SiYmTI6ZuOyPAYqhPlT896bOePlv_ei-fX928P1j_bu583t9dVda2GQpQXlrOd8nPyIHEYvJyMt2okrmEYnxeCqbxS-l84ZC6rjnTNbgaLrpl5KDxfN7anXRbPXh0T1oBcdDelViGmnTSpkZ9TOWmfcJI3xuJ3kpEbsnNj2VoAXBlXt4qcum2LOCf3_PsH1kYFeGeiVgT4yqJGbUyQtVLSN84zr5-S9KfkYAxCDpuDjaij1_p53YjziGRQXUoHsq8jhFQ30mO4 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
DOI | 10.5130/ijcre.v18i1.9326 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Education |
EISSN | 1836-3393 |
EndPage | 14 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_dccdadb8aafe4b8b97e2d145c13f1ae9 10_5130_ijcre_v18i1_9326 10.3316/informit.T2025021700006901893852020 |
Genre | Research articles (Peer reviewed) |
GroupedDBID | 29H 5VS AAFWJ ABDBF ACGFO ACUHS ADBBV AFPKN AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BCNDV EAP ESX GROUPED_DOAJ KEL KQ8 M~E OK1 P2P TR2 TUS AAYXX CITATION |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-39dcf007bf7e037f8ba8cecb093b7d816dc3671f58ddac39202da41e122b588f3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1836-3393 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:30 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:39:44 EDT 2025 Sun Feb 23 12:20:11 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c368t-39dcf007bf7e037f8ba8cecb093b7d816dc3671f58ddac39202da41e122b588f3 |
Notes | Gateways, Vol. 18, No. 1, June 2025, 1-14 Informit, Melbourne (Vic) |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/dccdadb8aafe4b8b97e2d145c13f1ae9 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_dccdadb8aafe4b8b97e2d145c13f1ae9 crossref_primary_10_5130_ijcre_v18i1_9326 rmit_collectionsjats_10_3316_informit_t2025021700006901893852020 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2025 text: 2025-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Sydney |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Sydney |
PublicationTitle | Gateways (Sydney, N.S.W.) |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | UTS ePress UTS ePRESS |
Publisher_xml | – name: UTS ePress – name: UTS ePRESS |
SSID | ssj0000399367 |
Score | 2.2783546 |
Snippet | This article analyses scientific extractivism as a research process in which the experiences, discourses and knowledge of members of marginalised social groups... |
SourceID | doaj crossref rmit |
SourceType | Open Website Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 1 |
SubjectTerms | accountability Communities epistemic justice Evaluation marginalized communities Methodology post-extractivist knowledge policy relational ethics Responsibility Scientific extractivism Social groups |
Title | Resisting scientific extractivism: A post-extractivist policy of knowledge production with marginalised communities |
URI | http://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.T2025021700006901893852020 https://doaj.org/article/dccdadb8aafe4b8b97e2d145c13f1ae9 |
Volume | 18 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV09T-QwELUQ19Ag7gCxcCAXNBSB-Ct2qNi9Y4UoKBBIdJY_0SKRXZFAwa_HY--hpaK5LrIs23oTe16cmTcIHRvBmeFWVTEyUfHEqSvVOFfRkNxnGymJJUD2prm659cP4mGl1BfEhBV54ALcmXfOG2-VMTGkMW0rA_WEC0dYJCbk1L26rVc-pvIZDH63keW_pEjn9NnsKbGw0zeiZuQUOMsXP5Tl-r_k0Gf3Mt1Cm0teiMdlPT_RWuh-QUnlZfjFNupvQw_7sXvEJYkRYnxwOlpzmtPbrH8-x2O8mPdDtdI44EUW_sXziD-vz_CiyLymcTHcw-Jn85KrY83eg8eupIyA0OoOup9e3v25qpYVEyrHGjVUrPUuJq9voww1k1FZo1xwtm6ZlV6Rxqd-kkShvDcuUaOaesNJIJRaoVRku2i9m3dhD2EG8U-qpUbKhkt4qr2KLRVRCu54M0In__DTiyKModMHBWCtM9Y6Y60B6xGaAMCf_UDSOjckQ-ulofV3hh6hCzCPhv2Ro9S6_skMPUzKGGl0EZpNHQYKvI6C8GDWYSaJkimRGuv9_7GOA7QBE5RrmN9ofXh5DYeJmAz2CP0YT_5Opkf5XfwAttznQA |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resisting+scientific+extractivism%3A+A+post-extractivist+policy+of+knowledge+production+with+marginalised+communities&rft.jtitle=Gateways+%28Sydney%2C+N.S.W.%29&rft.au=Baptiste+Godrie&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.pub=UTS+ePress&rft.eissn=1836-3393&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=14&rft_id=info:doi/10.5130%2Fijcre.v18i1.9326&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10.3316%2Finformit.T2025021700006901893852020 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1836-3393&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1836-3393&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1836-3393&client=summon |