Silage fermentation profile, chemical composition and economic evaluation of millet and soya bean grown in monocultures and as intercrops

In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops, such as millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGrass and forage science Vol. 71; no. 4; pp. 584 - 594
Main Authors Jahanzad, E., Sadeghpour, A., Hashemi, M., Keshavarz Afshar, R., Hosseini, M. B., Barker, A. V.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops, such as millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude protein content for dairy cows. A field experiment was conducted in 2 years to evaluate (i) whether intercropping millet with a relatively drought‐tolerant soya bean cultivar (Glycine max Merr, cv. Williams) could improve silage quality with minimum yield penalty, and (ii) if the application of molasses could further enhance the nutritive value of silage of millet–soya bean intercrops. There were three intercropping ratios (60% millet with 40% soya bean, 50% millet with 50% soya bean, 40% millet with 60% soya bean) and monocultures of millet and soya bean. Mixed forages were treated with three levels of molasses: M0 (without molasses), M1, and M2 (2·5 and 5% fresh matter respectively). Inclusion of soya bean in millet crops resulted in decreased silage yield compared with millet alone. The highest yield was obtained from the ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean. Molasses‐treated silage had higher lactic acid, lower pH, and lower acid detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF). Silage produced from millet–soya bean intercrops exhibited enhanced fermentation, indicated by lower pH (3·64) and higher lactic acid (16·63 g kg−1 DM) than silage from monocultures. Intercropping ratios had lower water‐soluble carbohydrate, ADF and NDF than millet monoculture. Overall, an intercropping ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean was advantageous over other ratios in terms of higher yield, nutritive value and economic value.
AbstractList In recent years, dairy farmers in semi-arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought-tolerant crops, such as millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude protein content for dairy cows. A field experiment was conducted in 2 years to evaluate (i) whether intercropping millet with a relatively drought-tolerant soya bean cultivar (Glycine max Merr, cv. Williams) could improve silage quality with minimum yield penalty, and (ii) if the application of molasses could further enhance the nutritive value of silage of millet-soya bean intercrops. There were three intercropping ratios (60% millet with 40% soya bean, 50% millet with 50% soya bean, 40% millet with 60% soya bean) and monocultures of millet and soya bean. Mixed forages were treated with three levels of molasses: M sub(0) (without molasses), M sub(1), and M sub(2) (2.5 and 5% fresh matter respectively). Inclusion of soya bean in millet crops resulted in decreased silage yield compared with millet alone. The highest yield was obtained from the ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean. Molasses-treated silage had higher lactic acid, lower pH, and lower acid detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF). Silage produced from millet-soya bean intercrops exhibited enhanced fermentation, indicated by lower pH (3.64) and higher lactic acid (16.63 g kg super(-1) DM) than silage from monocultures. Intercropping ratios had lower water-soluble carbohydrate, ADF and NDF than millet monoculture. Overall, an intercropping ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean was advantageous over other ratios in terms of higher yield, nutritive value and economic value.
In recent years, dairy farmers in semi-arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought-tolerant crops, such as millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude protein content for dairy cows. A field experiment was conducted in 2 years to evaluate (i) whether intercropping millet with a relatively drought-tolerant soya bean cultivar (Glycine max Merr, cv. Williams) could improve silage quality with minimum yield penalty, and (ii) if the application of molasses could further enhance the nutritive value of silage of millet-soya bean intercrops. There were three intercropping ratios (60% millet with 40% soya bean, 50% millet with 50% soya bean, 40% millet with 60% soya bean) and monocultures of millet and soya bean. Mixed forages were treated with three levels of molasses: M0 (without molasses), M1, and M2 (2·5 and 5% fresh matter respectively). Inclusion of soya bean in millet crops resulted in decreased silage yield compared with millet alone. The highest yield was obtained from the ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean. Molasses-treated silage had higher lactic acid, lower pH, and lower acid detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF). Silage produced from millet-soya bean intercrops exhibited enhanced fermentation, indicated by lower pH (3·64) and higher lactic acid (16·63 g kg-1 DM) than silage from monocultures. Intercropping ratios had lower water-soluble carbohydrate, ADF and NDF than millet monoculture. Overall, an intercropping ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean was advantageous over other ratios in terms of higher yield, nutritive value and economic value.
In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops, such as millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude protein content for dairy cows. A field experiment was conducted in 2 years to evaluate (i) whether intercropping millet with a relatively drought‐tolerant soya bean cultivar (Glycine max Merr, cv. Williams) could improve silage quality with minimum yield penalty, and (ii) if the application of molasses could further enhance the nutritive value of silage of millet–soya bean intercrops. There were three intercropping ratios (60% millet with 40% soya bean, 50% millet with 50% soya bean, 40% millet with 60% soya bean) and monocultures of millet and soya bean. Mixed forages were treated with three levels of molasses: M0 (without molasses), M1, and M2 (2·5 and 5% fresh matter respectively). Inclusion of soya bean in millet crops resulted in decreased silage yield compared with millet alone. The highest yield was obtained from the ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean. Molasses‐treated silage had higher lactic acid, lower pH, and lower acid detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF). Silage produced from millet–soya bean intercrops exhibited enhanced fermentation, indicated by lower pH (3·64) and higher lactic acid (16·63 g kg−1 DM) than silage from monocultures. Intercropping ratios had lower water‐soluble carbohydrate, ADF and NDF than millet monoculture. Overall, an intercropping ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean was advantageous over other ratios in terms of higher yield, nutritive value and economic value.
Abstract In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize ( Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops, such as millet ( Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude protein content for dairy cows. A field experiment was conducted in 2 years to evaluate (i) whether intercropping millet with a relatively drought‐tolerant soya bean cultivar ( Glycine max Merr, cv. Williams) could improve silage quality with minimum yield penalty, and (ii) if the application of molasses could further enhance the nutritive value of silage of millet–soya bean intercrops. There were three intercropping ratios (60% millet with 40% soya bean, 50% millet with 50% soya bean, 40% millet with 60% soya bean) and monocultures of millet and soya bean. Mixed forages were treated with three levels of molasses: M 0 (without molasses), M 1 , and M 2 (2·5 and 5% fresh matter respectively). Inclusion of soya bean in millet crops resulted in decreased silage yield compared with millet alone. The highest yield was obtained from the ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean. Molasses‐treated silage had higher lactic acid, lower pH, and lower acid detergent fibre ( ADF ) and neutral detergent fibre ( NDF ). Silage produced from millet–soya bean intercrops exhibited enhanced fermentation, indicated by lower pH (3·64) and higher lactic acid (16·63 g kg −1 DM) than silage from monocultures. Intercropping ratios had lower water‐soluble carbohydrate, ADF and NDF than millet monoculture. Overall, an intercropping ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean was advantageous over other ratios in terms of higher yield, nutritive value and economic value.
Author Sadeghpour, A.
Jahanzad, E.
Keshavarz Afshar, R.
Hashemi, M.
Hosseini, M. B.
Barker, A. V.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: E.
  surname: Jahanzad
  fullname: Jahanzad, E.
  email: ejahanzad@psis.umass.edu, E. Jahanzad, Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Bowditch Hall, Amherst, MA 01003, USA., ejahanzad@psis.umass.edu
  organization: Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, MA, Amherst, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: A.
  surname: Sadeghpour
  fullname: Sadeghpour, A.
  organization: Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, NY, Ithaca, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: M.
  surname: Hashemi
  fullname: Hashemi, M.
  organization: Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, MA, Amherst, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: R.
  surname: Keshavarz Afshar
  fullname: Keshavarz Afshar, R.
  organization: Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, MA, Amherst, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: M. B.
  surname: Hosseini
  fullname: Hosseini, M. B.
  organization: Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, Karaj, Tehran, Iran
– sequence: 6
  givenname: A. V.
  surname: Barker
  fullname: Barker, A. V.
  organization: Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, MA, Amherst, USA
BookMark eNp1kd9qFDEUh4NUcLv1wjcIeKPgtPkzk0wuZWlXYWmRtgjehDRzZk3NJGsyY91H8K1Nd9QLocnFgZzvCzn5HaOjEAMg9IqSU1rW2bbPp5QxKp6hBeWiqVit6iO0ILRmVcNq9gId53xPCJGK8wX6de282QLuIQ0QRjO6GPAuxd55eIftVxicNR7bOOxidoeuCR0GG0MsLQw_jJ9mK_Z4cN7DeCBy3Bt8BybgbYoPAbuAh-LYyY9TgnxgTC7HIySb4i6foOe98Rle_qlLdHtxfrP6UG2u1h9X7zeV5aIVlSFKtS2jrRTGmI5QRSzhStUdLQDwhkhC-64xpOFNeyek6jpietaDJPxxL9Gb-d4y5fcJ8qgHly14bwLEKWva1qKmTEpe0Nf_ofdxSqG8rlBcCEKbUpfo7UyVMXJO0OtdcoNJe02JfgxFl1D0IZTCns3sQ_nf_dOgXl9c_zWq2XB5hJ__DJO-aSG5bPTny7XeqC-Xn24Y1yv-G6yXn88
CODEN GFSCDW
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1111_jam_14636
crossref_primary_10_1111_jam_14896
crossref_primary_10_3390_fermentation8120696
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2017_04_055
crossref_primary_10_29312_remexca_v15i2_3648
crossref_primary_10_3390_fermentation8040174
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2020_123773
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2018_05_097
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2020_123371
crossref_primary_10_5433_1679_0359_2019v40n5Supl1p2397
crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_8478cr20210482
crossref_primary_10_1080_09712119_2023_2165087
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13040764
crossref_primary_10_1111_gfs_12475
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anifeedsci_2023_115779
crossref_primary_10_5713_ajas_18_0886
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture11050452
crossref_primary_10_3390_fermentation8040140
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2020_123655
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00203_021_02658_z
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_78217_1
crossref_primary_10_5713_ajas_20_0079
crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_387_1_012017
crossref_primary_10_1111_grs_12289
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1247254
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00783.x
10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x
10.1016/j.agwat.2012.11.001
10.1111/nph.13132
10.1111/j.1365-2494.1995.tb02320.x
10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00049-7
10.2527/1991.69114588x
10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.015
10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00890.x
10.1007/s12155-014-9485-x
10.2134/agronj13.0589
10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.021
10.1016/S0377-8401(97)81640-9
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
10.1201/9781420005271
10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c37
10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79677-0
10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60936-0
10.1021/ac60302a043
10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.027
10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.077
10.1002/jsfa.2740350307
10.1002/jpln.201200062
10.2135/cropsci2015.02.0130
10.2134/agronj13.0542
10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900020014x
10.1111/gfs.12076
10.1021/jf60107a021
10.1016/j.agwat.2011.05.014
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
– notice: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
7QR
7ST
7TM
8FD
C1K
FR3
M7N
P64
RC3
SOI
DOI 10.1111/gfs.12216
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Chemoreception Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Engineering Research Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Genetics Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
Chemoreception Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Environment Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList Environment Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts

CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1365-2494
EndPage 594
ExternalDocumentID 4240718051
10_1111_gfs_12216
GFS12216
ark_67375_WNG_L9ZNQT23_C
Genre article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Forage Program of University of Tehran
– fundername: Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts
GroupedDBID ..I
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29I
31~
33P
3SF
4.4
4P2
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
5GY
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABHUG
ABJNI
ABPTK
ABPVW
ABWRO
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACSCC
ACSMX
ACXBN
ACXME
ACXQS
ADAWD
ADBBV
ADDAD
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFPWT
AFRAH
AFVGU
AFZJQ
AGJLS
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AUFTA
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
CAG
COF
CS3
D-E
D-F
DC6
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DROCM
DRSTM
DU5
EAD
EAP
EBD
EBS
ECGQY
EDH
EJD
EMK
EST
ESX
F00
F01
F04
FEDTE
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.T
H.X
HF~
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TUS
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WIH
WIK
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WUPDE
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
XOL
ZZTAW
~IA
~KM
~WT
AAHBH
AITYG
HGLYW
OIG
AAYXX
CITATION
7QR
7ST
7TM
8FD
C1K
FR3
M7N
P64
RC3
SOI
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3686-a0998821876aaad0190c03994d1c36e350701fd5a05358b679dd0af2fe7030303
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0142-5242
IngestDate Sat Aug 17 02:39:58 EDT 2024
Fri Sep 13 05:31:33 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 01:27:26 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 01:10:29 EDT 2024
Wed Jan 17 04:59:47 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3686-a0998821876aaad0190c03994d1c36e350701fd5a05358b679dd0af2fe7030303
Notes istex:59EBBC6B7B11FA0905229DAC1D9E1BEFFE5EBF41
ArticleID:GFS12216
Forage Program of University of Tehran
ark:/67375/WNG-L9ZNQT23-C
Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 1836601518
PQPubID 1066342
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1846412773
proquest_journals_1836601518
crossref_primary_10_1111_gfs_12216
wiley_primary_10_1111_gfs_12216_GFS12216
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_L9ZNQT23_C
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-12
December 2016
2016-12-00
20161201
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-12
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Oxford
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford
PublicationTitle Grass and forage science
PublicationTitleAlternate Grass Forage Sci
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References Denek N., Can A., Avci M., Aksu T. and Durmaz A. (2011) The effect of molasses-based pre-fermented juice on the fermentation quality of first-cut lucerne silage. Grass and Forage Science, 66, 243-250.
McDonald P., Henderson A.R. and Heron S.J.E. (1991) The biochemistry of silage, 2nd edn, pp. 167-183. Kent, UK: Chalcombe Publications.
Esmaeili A., Sadeghpour A., Hosseini S.M.B., Jahanzad E., Chaichi M.R. and Hashemi M. (2011) Evaluation of seed yield and competition indices for intercropped annual medic-barley. International Journal of Plant Production, 4, 395-404.
Alli I., Fairbairn R., Noroozi E. and Baker B.B. (1984) The effects of molasses on the fermentation of chopped whole-plant leucaena. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 35, 285-289.
Baytok E., Aksu T., Karsli M.A. and Muruz H. (2005) The effects of formic acid, molasses and inoculant as silage additives on corn silage composition and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 29, 469-474.
Umana R., Staples C.R., Bates D.B., Wilcox C.J. and Mahanna W.C. (1991) Effects of a microbial inoculant and (or) sugarcane molasses on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and digestibility of bermuda grass ensiled at two moisture contents. Journal of Animal Science, 69, 4588-4601.
Fisher D.S. and Burns J.C. (1987) Quality analysis of summer annual forages. II. Effects of forage carbohydrate constituents on silage fermentation. Agronomy Journal, 79, 242-248.
Eslamizadeh A., Kashani A., Siyadat S.A.A., Modhej A. and Lak S. (2015) Study of soybean forage at different planting dates intercropped with corn. Journal of Walia, 31, 108-112.
Ghanbarzadeh S., Chaichi M.R., Hosseini S.M.B. and Sadeghpour A. (2010) Evaluation of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density on chemical analysis of corn forage and weed population in an agro-forestry system. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 22, 2387-2397.
Hashemi M., Farsad A., Sadeghpour A., Weis S. and Herbert S.J. (2013) Cover crop seeding date influence on fall nitrogen recovery. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 176, 69-75.
Zandvakili O.R., Allahdadi I., Mazaheri D., Akbari G.A., Jahanzad E. and Mirshekari M. (2013) Effect of different planting proportions and nitrogen fertilizer in intercropping forage sorghum and lima bean. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8, 6488-6498.
Jahanzad E., Jorat M., Moghadam M., Sadeghpour A., Chaichi M.R. and Dashtaki M. (2013) Response of a new and a commonly grown forage sorghum cultivar to limited irrigation and planting density. Agricultural Water Management, 117, 62-69.
Keshavarz Afshar R., Ansari Jovini M., Chaichi M.R. and Hashemi M. (2014) Grain sorghum response to Arbuscular mycorrhiza and phosphorus fertilizer under deficit irrigation. Agronomy Journal, 106, 1212-1218.
Cherney R.F., Merry R.J., Williams A.P. and Tweed K.S. (1995) The effect of additives on the ensilage of forage of differing perennial ryegrass and white clover content. Grass and Forage Science, 50, 249-258.
Lima-Orozco R.A., Castro-Algeria A. and Fievez V. (2012) Ensiled sorghum and soybean as ruminant feed in the tropics, with emphasis on Cuba. Grass and Forage Science, 68, 20-32.
van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B. and Lewis B.A. (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583-3597.
Restelatto R., Pavinato P. S., Sartor L. R. and Paixão S. J. (2014) Production and nutritional value of sorghum and black oat forages under nitrogen fertilization. Grass and Forage Science, 69, 693-704.
SAS Institute (2003) SAS/STAT user's guide, version 9.1. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute.
Brooker R.W., Bennett A.E., Cong W.-F., Daniell T.J., George T.S., Hallett P.D., Hawes C., Pietro P.M., Iannetta P.P.M., Hamlyn G., Jones H.G., Karley A.J., Li L., McKenzie B.M., Pakeman R.J., Paterson E., Schöb C., Shen J., Squire G., Watson C.A., Zhang C., Zhang F., Zhang J. and White P.J. (2015) Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytologist, 206, 107-117.
Sadeghpour A., Hashemi M., Dacosta M., Jahanzad E. and Herbert S.J. (2014a) Switchgrass establishment influenced by cover crop, tillage systems and weed control. BioEnergy Research, 7, 1402-1410.
Tabatabaie S. M. H., Rafiee S., Keyhani A. and Heidari M. D. (2013) Energy use pattern and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and input costs for pear production in Iran. Renewable Energy, 51, 7-12.
Titterton M. and Maasdorp B.V. (1997) Nutritional improvement of maize silage for dairying: mixed crop silages from sole and intercropped legumes and a long season variety of maize. 2. Ensilage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 69, 263-270.
Rostamza M., Chaichi M.R., Jahansouz M.R. and Alimadadi A. (2011) Forage quality, water use and nitrogen utilization efficiencies of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) grown under different soil moisture and nitrogen levels. Agricultural Water Management, 98, 1607-1614.
Sadeghpour A., Jahanzad E., Hashemi M., Esmaeili A. and Herbert S.J. (2013b) Intercropping annual medic with barley may improve total forage and crude protein yield in semi-arid conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 7, 1822-1828.
Leibensperger R.Y. and Pitt R.E. (1988) Modelling the effects of formic acid and molasses on ensilage. Journal of Dairy Science, 71, 1220-1231.
Sadeghpour A., Jahanzad E., Esmaeili A., Hosseini S.M.B. and Hashemi H. (2013a) Forage yield, quality and economic benefit of intercropped barley and annual medic in semi-arid conditions: additive series. Field Crops Research, 148, 43-48.
Sadeghpour A., Hashemi M., Dacosta M., Gorlitsky E., Jahanzad E. and Herbert S.J. (2014b) Assessing winter cereals as cover crops for weed control in reduced-tillage switchgrass establishment. Industrial Crops and Products, 62, 522-525.
AOAC (1990) Association of official analytical chemists, official methods of analysis, 15th edn. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC.
Jahanzad E., Sadeghpour A., Hosseini M.B., Barker A.V., Hashemi M. and Keshavarz Afshar R. (2015) Competition, nitrogen use efficiency, and productivity of millet-soybean intercropping in semi-arid conditions. Crop Science, 55, 2842-2851.
Sadeghpour A. and Jahanzad E. (2012) Seed yield and yield components of intercropped barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and annual medic (Medicago scutellata L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 3, 47-50.
Rafiee S., Avval S.H.M. and Mohammadi A. (2010) Modelling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 35, 3301-3306.
Carter M.R. and Gregorich E.G. (2007) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn, pp. 1262. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
Sibanda S., Jingura R.M. and Topps J.H. (1997) The effect of level of inclusion of the legume Desmodium uncinatum and the use of molasses or ground maize as additives on the chemical composition of grass- and maize-legume silages. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 68, 295-305.
Okalebo J.R., Gathua K.W. and Woomer P. L. (1993) Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis. A working manual, pp. 116-124. Nairobi, Kenya: Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme (TSBF).
Amanloo A. and Mobtaker H.G. (2013) Energy balance and sensitivity analysis of inputs for forage maize production in Iran. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 5, 377-384.
Jahanzad E., Sadeghpour A., Hosseini M.B., Barker A.V., Hashemi M. and Zandvakili O.R. (2014) Silage yield and nutritive value of millet-soybean intercrops as influenced by nitrogen application. Agronomy Journal, 106, 1993-2000.
Ottenstein D.M. and Bartley D.A. (1971) Improved gas chromatography separation of free acids C2-C5 in dilute solution. Analytical Chemistry, 43, 952-955.
Wiseman H.G., Mallack J.C. and Jacobson W.C. (1960) Silage analysis. Determination of sugar in silages and forages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 8, 78-80.
Fehr W.R., Caviness C.E., Burmood D.T. and Pennington J.S. (1971) Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merr. Crop Science, 11, 929-931.
Zandvakili O.R., Allahdadi I., Mazaheri D., Akbari G.A., Jahanzad E. and Mirshekari M. (2012) Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of forage sorghum and lima bean under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes in additive-replacement series. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6, 223-235.
Andrews D.J. and Kumar K.A. (1992) Pearl millet for food, feed, and forage. Advances in Agronomy, 48, 89-139.
BOSTID (Board on Science and Technology for International Development) (1996) Lost crops of Africa grains. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy of Science.
1987; 79
2014b; 62
1995; 50
1971; 43
2010; 35
2015; 31
1991; 74
1997; 69
2015; 55
1997; 68
1996
2007
2014; 69
2011; 98
1994
1960; 8
1993
2015; 206
2003
2013a; 148
1991
2011; 4
2013; 8
2013; 5
2005; 29
1988; 71
2010; 22
1971; 11
2014; 106
2012; 3
1991; 69
1990
2013; 51
1984; 35
2013; 117
2013b; 7
2011; 66
1992; 48
2013; 176
2012; 6
2012; 68
2014a; 7
e_1_2_7_4_1
SAS Institute (e_1_2_7_38_1) 2003
e_1_2_7_9_1
Amanloo A. (e_1_2_7_3_1) 2013; 5
e_1_2_7_8_1
e_1_2_7_19_1
e_1_2_7_18_1
e_1_2_7_16_1
e_1_2_7_40_1
e_1_2_7_2_1
e_1_2_7_15_1
e_1_2_7_41_1
e_1_2_7_42_1
e_1_2_7_43_1
Zandvakili O.R. (e_1_2_7_45_1) 2012; 6
e_1_2_7_12_1
Okalebo J.R. (e_1_2_7_27_1) 1993
e_1_2_7_44_1
e_1_2_7_11_1
e_1_2_7_10_1
e_1_2_7_28_1
Paterson J.A. (e_1_2_7_29_1) 1994
McDonald P. (e_1_2_7_25_1) 1991
Ghanbarzadeh S. (e_1_2_7_17_1) 2010; 22
Esmaeili A. (e_1_2_7_14_1) 2011; 4
e_1_2_7_30_1
e_1_2_7_31_1
e_1_2_7_24_1
e_1_2_7_32_1
e_1_2_7_23_1
e_1_2_7_22_1
e_1_2_7_34_1
e_1_2_7_21_1
e_1_2_7_20_1
e_1_2_7_36_1
e_1_2_7_37_1
AOAC (e_1_2_7_5_1) 1990
e_1_2_7_39_1
Sadeghpour A. (e_1_2_7_33_1) 2012; 3
Sadeghpour A. (e_1_2_7_35_1) 2013; 7
Zandvakili O.R. (e_1_2_7_46_1) 2013; 8
Baytok E. (e_1_2_7_6_1) 2005; 29
Eslamizadeh A. (e_1_2_7_13_1) 2015; 31
Muck R.E. (e_1_2_7_26_1) 2003
BOSTID (Board on Science and Technology for International Development) (e_1_2_7_7_1) 1996
References_xml – volume: 69
  start-page: 693
  year: 2014
  end-page: 704
  article-title: Production and nutritional value of sorghum and black oat forages under nitrogen fertilization
  publication-title: Grass and Forage Science
– volume: 79
  start-page: 242
  year: 1987
  end-page: 248
  article-title: Quality analysis of summer annual forages. II. Effects of forage carbohydrate constituents on silage fermentation
  publication-title: Agronomy Journal
– volume: 22
  start-page: 2387
  year: 2010
  end-page: 2397
  article-title: Evaluation of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density on chemical analysis of corn forage and weed population in an agro‐forestry system
  publication-title: Asian Journal of Chemistry
– volume: 68
  start-page: 295
  year: 1997
  end-page: 305
  article-title: The effect of level of inclusion of the legume and the use of molasses or ground maize as additives on the chemical composition of grass‐ and maize‐legume silages
  publication-title: Animal Feed Science and Technology
– volume: 11
  start-page: 929
  year: 1971
  end-page: 931
  article-title: Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, (L.) Merr
  publication-title: Crop Science
– volume: 29
  start-page: 469
  year: 2005
  end-page: 474
  article-title: The effects of formic acid, molasses and inoculant as silage additives on corn silage composition and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep
  publication-title: Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences
– year: 2007
– volume: 3
  start-page: 47
  year: 2012
  end-page: 50
  article-title: Seed yield and yield components of intercropped barley ( L.) and annual medic ( L.)
  publication-title: Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering
– volume: 66
  start-page: 243
  year: 2011
  end-page: 250
  article-title: The effect of molasses‐based pre‐fermented juice on the fermentation quality of first‐cut lucerne silage
  publication-title: Grass and Forage Science
– start-page: 1085
  year: 1996
  end-page: 1121
– year: 2003
– year: 1996
– start-page: 167
  year: 1991
  end-page: 183
– volume: 117
  start-page: 62
  year: 2013
  end-page: 69
  article-title: Response of a new and a commonly grown forage sorghum cultivar to limited irrigation and planting density
  publication-title: Agricultural Water Management
– volume: 68
  start-page: 20
  year: 2012
  end-page: 32
  article-title: Ensiled sorghum and soybean as ruminant feed in the tropics, with emphasis on Cuba
  publication-title: Grass and Forage Science
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1402
  year: 2014a
  end-page: 1410
  article-title: Switchgrass establishment influenced by cover crop, tillage systems and weed control
  publication-title: BioEnergy Research
– start-page: 251
  year: 2003
  end-page: 304
– year: 1990
– volume: 5
  start-page: 377
  year: 2013
  end-page: 384
  article-title: Energy balance and sensitivity analysis of inputs for forage maize production in Iran
  publication-title: International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences
– volume: 62
  start-page: 522
  year: 2014b
  end-page: 525
  article-title: Assessing winter cereals as cover crops for weed control in reduced‐tillage switchgrass establishment
  publication-title: Industrial Crops and Products
– volume: 48
  start-page: 89
  year: 1992
  end-page: 139
  article-title: Pearl millet for food, feed, and forage
  publication-title: Advances in Agronomy
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1212
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1218
  article-title: Grain sorghum response to and phosphorus fertilizer under deficit irrigation
  publication-title: Agronomy Journal
– volume: 74
  start-page: 3583
  year: 1991
  end-page: 3597
  article-title: Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non‐starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition
  publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science
– volume: 98
  start-page: 1607
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1614
  article-title: Forage quality, water use and nitrogen utilization efficiencies of pearl millet ( L.) grown under different soil moisture and nitrogen levels
  publication-title: Agricultural Water Management
– volume: 71
  start-page: 1220
  year: 1988
  end-page: 1231
  article-title: Modelling the effects of formic acid and molasses on ensilage
  publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science
– volume: 69
  start-page: 263
  year: 1997
  end-page: 270
  article-title: Nutritional improvement of maize silage for dairying: mixed crop silages from sole and intercropped legumes and a long season variety of maize. 2. Ensilage
  publication-title: Animal Feed Science and Technology
– start-page: 9
  year: 1994
  end-page: 11
– volume: 106
  start-page: 1993
  year: 2014
  end-page: 2000
  article-title: Silage yield and nutritive value of millet–soybean intercrops as influenced by nitrogen application
  publication-title: Agronomy Journal
– volume: 51
  start-page: 7
  year: 2013
  end-page: 12
  article-title: Energy use pattern and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and input costs for pear production in Iran
  publication-title: Renewable Energy
– volume: 69
  start-page: 4588
  year: 1991
  end-page: 4601
  article-title: Effects of a microbial inoculant and (or) sugarcane molasses on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and digestibility of bermuda grass ensiled at two moisture contents
  publication-title: Journal of Animal Science
– volume: 8
  start-page: 78
  year: 1960
  end-page: 80
  article-title: Silage analysis. Determination of sugar in silages and forages
  publication-title: Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
– volume: 50
  start-page: 249
  year: 1995
  end-page: 258
  article-title: The effect of additives on the ensilage of forage of differing perennial ryegrass and white clover content
  publication-title: Grass and Forage Science
– volume: 6
  start-page: 223
  year: 2012
  end-page: 235
  article-title: Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of forage sorghum and lima bean under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes in additive‐replacement series
  publication-title: Journal of Agricultural Science
– volume: 31
  start-page: 108
  year: 2015
  end-page: 112
  article-title: Study of soybean forage at different planting dates intercropped with corn
  publication-title: Journal of Walia
– volume: 148
  start-page: 43
  year: 2013a
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Forage yield, quality and economic benefit of intercropped barley and annual medic in semi‐arid conditions: additive series
  publication-title: Field Crops Research
– volume: 206
  start-page: 107
  year: 2015
  end-page: 117
  article-title: Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology
  publication-title: New Phytologist
– volume: 35
  start-page: 3301
  year: 2010
  end-page: 3306
  article-title: Modelling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran
  publication-title: Energy
– start-page: 116
  year: 1993
  end-page: 124
– volume: 35
  start-page: 285
  year: 1984
  end-page: 289
  article-title: The effects of molasses on the fermentation of chopped whole‐plant leucaena
  publication-title: Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
– volume: 8
  start-page: 6488
  year: 2013
  end-page: 6498
  article-title: Effect of different planting proportions and nitrogen fertilizer in intercropping forage sorghum and lima bean
  publication-title: African Journal of Agricultural Research
– volume: 176
  start-page: 69
  year: 2013
  end-page: 75
  article-title: Cover crop seeding date influence on fall nitrogen recovery
  publication-title: Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1822
  year: 2013b
  end-page: 1828
  article-title: Intercropping annual medic with barley may improve total forage and crude protein yield in semi‐arid conditions
  publication-title: Australian Journal of Crop Science
– volume: 43
  start-page: 952
  year: 1971
  end-page: 955
  article-title: Improved gas chromatography separation of free acids C2–C5 in dilute solution
  publication-title: Analytical Chemistry
– volume: 4
  start-page: 395
  year: 2011
  end-page: 404
  article-title: Evaluation of seed yield and competition indices for intercropped annual medic–barley
  publication-title: International Journal of Plant Production
– volume: 55
  start-page: 2842
  year: 2015
  end-page: 2851
  article-title: Competition, nitrogen use efficiency, and productivity of millet‐soybean intercropping in semi‐arid conditions
  publication-title: Crop Science
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00783.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.11.001
– volume: 3
  start-page: 47
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_7_33_1
  article-title: Seed yield and yield components of intercropped barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and annual medic (Medicago scutellata L.)
  publication-title: Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering
  contributor:
    fullname: Sadeghpour A.
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_1
  doi: 10.1111/nph.13132
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1995.tb02320.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_39_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00049-7
– volume-title: SAS/STAT user's guide, version 9.1
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_7_38_1
  contributor:
    fullname: SAS Institute
– ident: e_1_2_7_43_1
  doi: 10.2527/1991.69114588x
– volume-title: Association of official analytical chemists, official methods of analysis
  year: 1990
  ident: e_1_2_7_5_1
  contributor:
    fullname: AOAC
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.015
– volume: 5
  start-page: 377
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_7_3_1
  article-title: Energy balance and sensitivity analysis of inputs for forage maize production in Iran
  publication-title: International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences
  contributor:
    fullname: Amanloo A.
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00890.x
– volume-title: Lost crops of Africa grains
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_7_7_1
  contributor:
    fullname: BOSTID (Board on Science and Technology for International Development)
– ident: e_1_2_7_36_1
  doi: 10.1007/s12155-014-9485-x
– start-page: 9
  volume-title: Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization
  year: 1994
  ident: e_1_2_7_29_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Paterson J.A.
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj13.0589
– ident: e_1_2_7_34_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.021
– ident: e_1_2_7_42_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(97)81640-9
– ident: e_1_2_7_40_1
  doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_1
  doi: 10.1201/9781420005271
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1822
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_7_35_1
  article-title: Intercropping annual medic with barley may improve total forage and crude protein yield in semi‐arid conditions
  publication-title: Australian Journal of Crop Science
  contributor:
    fullname: Sadeghpour A.
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_1
  doi: 10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c37
– start-page: 251
  volume-title: Silage science and technology
  year: 2003
  ident: e_1_2_7_26_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Muck R.E.
– start-page: 167
  volume-title: The biochemistry of silage
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_7_25_1
  contributor:
    fullname: McDonald P.
– start-page: 116
  volume-title: Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis. A working manual
  year: 1993
  ident: e_1_2_7_27_1
  contributor:
    fullname: Okalebo J.R.
– volume: 29
  start-page: 469
  year: 2005
  ident: e_1_2_7_6_1
  article-title: The effects of formic acid, molasses and inoculant as silage additives on corn silage composition and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep
  publication-title: Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences
  contributor:
    fullname: Baytok E.
– volume: 22
  start-page: 2387
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_7_17_1
  article-title: Evaluation of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density on chemical analysis of corn forage and weed population in an agro‐forestry system
  publication-title: Asian Journal of Chemistry
  contributor:
    fullname: Ghanbarzadeh S.
– volume: 4
  start-page: 395
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_7_14_1
  article-title: Evaluation of seed yield and competition indices for intercropped annual medic–barley
  publication-title: International Journal of Plant Production
  contributor:
    fullname: Esmaeili A.
– volume: 6
  start-page: 223
  year: 2012
  ident: e_1_2_7_45_1
  article-title: Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of forage sorghum and lima bean under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes in additive‐replacement series
  publication-title: Journal of Agricultural Science
  contributor:
    fullname: Zandvakili O.R.
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_1
  doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79677-0
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60936-0
– volume: 31
  start-page: 108
  year: 2015
  ident: e_1_2_7_13_1
  article-title: Study of soybean forage at different planting dates intercropped with corn
  publication-title: Journal of Walia
  contributor:
    fullname: Eslamizadeh A.
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_1
  doi: 10.1021/ac60302a043
– ident: e_1_2_7_37_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.027
– ident: e_1_2_7_41_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.077
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_1
  doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740350307
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_1
  doi: 10.1002/jpln.201200062
– volume: 8
  start-page: 6488
  year: 2013
  ident: e_1_2_7_46_1
  article-title: Effect of different planting proportions and nitrogen fertilizer in intercropping forage sorghum and lima bean
  publication-title: African Journal of Agricultural Research
  contributor:
    fullname: Zandvakili O.R.
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_1
  doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.02.0130
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj13.0542
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_1
  doi: 10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900020014x
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_1
  doi: 10.1111/gfs.12076
– ident: e_1_2_7_44_1
  doi: 10.1021/jf60107a021
– ident: e_1_2_7_32_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.05.014
SSID ssj0007933
Score 2.2790794
Snippet In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops, such as...
Abstract In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize ( Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops,...
In recent years, dairy farmers in semi-arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought-tolerant crops, such as...
SourceID proquest
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 584
SubjectTerms Glycine max
intercropping
millet
molasses
nutritive value
Pennisetum glaucum
silage
soya bean
Zea mays
Title Silage fermentation profile, chemical composition and economic evaluation of millet and soya bean grown in monocultures and as intercrops
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-L9ZNQT23-C/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fgfs.12216
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1836601518/abstract/
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1846412773
Volume 71
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Ra9RAEB5KfakPVlvF1LZsRcQHc2Q3e0kOn0rxWooe1LZYRAi72d2jtCRyuQPtP-i_dmazubaCIJKXQCbJZndn9pvNzDcAb_KRSexIuxihhIslrpixdskoVjihDS6fjmv6o_t5kh2dy-OL4cUKfOhzYTp-iOWGG2mGt9ek4Eq395R86toBF4IT3TYR6REg-nJHHZWHMvJckrMlRWAVoiie5Z0P1qJH1K0_HwDN-3DVrzfjdfjet7QLM7kaLOZ6UN38QeL4n5_yFJ4EHMr2u4nzDFZsvQGP96ezwMVhN-H29PIarQ1zaLxDhlLNQo3v96wKTAOMgtJD5BdTtWE2pDqzOyJx1jhG5Y3s3Eu0zS_FtFU1m9ImALusGSpDE17cehnVMmKymFGFsfY5nI8_nh0cxaFyQ1ylWZHFCnEnQneOplYpZShfvUoQCknDUcCmCEIT7sxQEbtMoTOcMSZRTjhLBgiPF7BaN7V9CawQ2lpeVU67Qgr0ZzJtRK4F-nXSpkZH8Lofw_JHR9BR9o4N9mvp-zWCt350lxJqdkURbfmw_Do5LD-Nvk1OzkRaHkSw3Q9_GZQZH1GkGfqtQ15EsLe8jGpI_1ZUbZsFychMcpHnaQTv_Fj_vTXl4fjUn2z9u-grWEOolnWBNNuwOp8t7A7Cobne9fP-N6D6Bxw
link.rule.ids 315,786,790,1382,27957,27958,46329,46753
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3di9QwEB_Ouwf1wW-xemoUER_s0qTpx4Ivx-HeqnsLent4HEhImmQ57miP7S6o_4H_tZM03bsTBJG-FDpt0yQz-U068xuAV8VQJ2aobIxQwsYcV8xY2WQYS5zQGpdPS5X7o7s_zceH_ONRdrQB7_pcmI4fYr3h5jTD22un4G5D-pKWz207oIzR_Bpsobpn3qH6ckEeVYRC8pQ7d4uzwCvk4njWt15ZjbZcx36_AjUvA1a_4oxuw7e-rV2gyelgtVSD6ucfNI7_-zF34FaAomSnmzt3YcPU9-DmznwR6DjMffh1cHKGBodYtN8hSakmocz3W1IFsgHi4tJD8BeRtSYmZDuTCy5x0ljiKhyZpZdomx-SKCNrMnf7AOSkJqgPTXhx62VkSxyZxcIVGWsfwOHo_Wx3HIfiDXGV5mUeS4SeiN4pWlsppXYp61WCaIhrigImRRyaUKsz6QhmSpXjpNGJtMwaZ4PweAibdVObR0BKpoyhVWWVLTlDlyZXmhWKoWvHTapVBC_7QRTnHUeH6H0b7Ffh-zWC13541xJyceqC2opMfJ3uicnwePp5xlKxG8F2P_4i6DM-okxzdF0zWkbwYn0ZNdH9XpG1aVZOhuecsqJII3jjB_vvrRF7owN_8vjfRZ_D9fFsfyImH6afnsANRG55F1ezDZvLxco8RXS0VM-8EvwGFQwLPg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3_a9QwFH_MDcT94HdZdWoUEX-wR5Pm0h7-NDZvU-ehbsMhQkia5BiTdlzvQP0P_K99SdPbJggi_aXQ1zZN8l4-L33v8wCeFSOT2ZF2KUIJl3JcMVPtslGqcEIbXD4d1f6P7vuJ2Dvib4-Hxyvwqs-F6fghlhtuXjOCvfYKfmbcBSWfunZAGaPiCqxxkTM_pXc-nXNHFbGOPOXe2-Is0gr5MJ7lrZcWozXfr98vIc2LeDUsOOMb8LVvahdncjpYzPWg-vkHi-N_fstNuB6BKNnqZs4tWLH1bVjfms4iGYe9A78OTr6huSEOrXdMUapJLPL9klSRaoD4qPQY-kVUbYiNuc7knEmcNI74-kZ2HiTa5oci2qqaTP0uADmpCWpDE1_cBhnVEk9lMfMlxtq7cDR-fbi9l8bSDWmVi1KkCoEnYneKtlYpZXzCepUhFuKGooDNEYVm1Jmh8vQypRY4ZUymHHPWWyA87sFq3dR2A0jJtLW0qpx2JWfo0AhtWKEZOnbc5kYn8LQfQ3nWMXTI3rPBfpWhXxN4HkZ3KaFmpz6krRjKz5NduT_6Mvl4yHK5ncBmP_wyajM-oswFOq5DWibwZHkZ9dD_XFG1bRZehgtOWVHkCbwIY_331sjd8UE4uf_voo_h6oedsdx_M3n3AK4hbBNdUM0mrM5nC_sQodFcPwoq8BvzFgnt
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Silage+fermentation+profile%2C+chemical+composition+and+economic+evaluation+of+millet+and+soya+bean+grown+in+monocultures+and+as+intercrops&rft.jtitle=Grass+and+forage+science&rft.au=Jahanzad%2C+E.&rft.au=Sadeghpour%2C+A.&rft.au=Hashemi%2C+M.&rft.au=Keshavarz+Afshar%2C+R.&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.issn=0142-5242&rft.eissn=1365-2494&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=584&rft.epage=594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fgfs.12216&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fgfs.12216&rft.externalDocID=GFS12216
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0142-5242&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0142-5242&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0142-5242&client=summon