Silage fermentation profile, chemical composition and economic evaluation of millet and soya bean grown in monocultures and as intercrops
In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops, such as millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude...
Saved in:
Published in | Grass and forage science Vol. 71; no. 4; pp. 584 - 594 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops, such as millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude protein content for dairy cows. A field experiment was conducted in 2 years to evaluate (i) whether intercropping millet with a relatively drought‐tolerant soya bean cultivar (Glycine max Merr, cv. Williams) could improve silage quality with minimum yield penalty, and (ii) if the application of molasses could further enhance the nutritive value of silage of millet–soya bean intercrops. There were three intercropping ratios (60% millet with 40% soya bean, 50% millet with 50% soya bean, 40% millet with 60% soya bean) and monocultures of millet and soya bean. Mixed forages were treated with three levels of molasses: M0 (without molasses), M1, and M2 (2·5 and 5% fresh matter respectively). Inclusion of soya bean in millet crops resulted in decreased silage yield compared with millet alone. The highest yield was obtained from the ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean. Molasses‐treated silage had higher lactic acid, lower pH, and lower acid detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF). Silage produced from millet–soya bean intercrops exhibited enhanced fermentation, indicated by lower pH (3·64) and higher lactic acid (16·63 g kg−1 DM) than silage from monocultures. Intercropping ratios had lower water‐soluble carbohydrate, ADF and NDF than millet monoculture. Overall, an intercropping ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean was advantageous over other ratios in terms of higher yield, nutritive value and economic value. |
---|---|
AbstractList | In recent years, dairy farmers in semi-arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought-tolerant crops, such as millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude protein content for dairy cows. A field experiment was conducted in 2 years to evaluate (i) whether intercropping millet with a relatively drought-tolerant soya bean cultivar (Glycine max Merr, cv. Williams) could improve silage quality with minimum yield penalty, and (ii) if the application of molasses could further enhance the nutritive value of silage of millet-soya bean intercrops. There were three intercropping ratios (60% millet with 40% soya bean, 50% millet with 50% soya bean, 40% millet with 60% soya bean) and monocultures of millet and soya bean. Mixed forages were treated with three levels of molasses: M sub(0) (without molasses), M sub(1), and M sub(2) (2.5 and 5% fresh matter respectively). Inclusion of soya bean in millet crops resulted in decreased silage yield compared with millet alone. The highest yield was obtained from the ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean. Molasses-treated silage had higher lactic acid, lower pH, and lower acid detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF). Silage produced from millet-soya bean intercrops exhibited enhanced fermentation, indicated by lower pH (3.64) and higher lactic acid (16.63 g kg super(-1) DM) than silage from monocultures. Intercropping ratios had lower water-soluble carbohydrate, ADF and NDF than millet monoculture. Overall, an intercropping ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean was advantageous over other ratios in terms of higher yield, nutritive value and economic value. In recent years, dairy farmers in semi-arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought-tolerant crops, such as millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude protein content for dairy cows. A field experiment was conducted in 2 years to evaluate (i) whether intercropping millet with a relatively drought-tolerant soya bean cultivar (Glycine max Merr, cv. Williams) could improve silage quality with minimum yield penalty, and (ii) if the application of molasses could further enhance the nutritive value of silage of millet-soya bean intercrops. There were three intercropping ratios (60% millet with 40% soya bean, 50% millet with 50% soya bean, 40% millet with 60% soya bean) and monocultures of millet and soya bean. Mixed forages were treated with three levels of molasses: M0 (without molasses), M1, and M2 (2·5 and 5% fresh matter respectively). Inclusion of soya bean in millet crops resulted in decreased silage yield compared with millet alone. The highest yield was obtained from the ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean. Molasses-treated silage had higher lactic acid, lower pH, and lower acid detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF). Silage produced from millet-soya bean intercrops exhibited enhanced fermentation, indicated by lower pH (3·64) and higher lactic acid (16·63 g kg-1 DM) than silage from monocultures. Intercropping ratios had lower water-soluble carbohydrate, ADF and NDF than millet monoculture. Overall, an intercropping ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean was advantageous over other ratios in terms of higher yield, nutritive value and economic value. In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops, such as millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude protein content for dairy cows. A field experiment was conducted in 2 years to evaluate (i) whether intercropping millet with a relatively drought‐tolerant soya bean cultivar (Glycine max Merr, cv. Williams) could improve silage quality with minimum yield penalty, and (ii) if the application of molasses could further enhance the nutritive value of silage of millet–soya bean intercrops. There were three intercropping ratios (60% millet with 40% soya bean, 50% millet with 50% soya bean, 40% millet with 60% soya bean) and monocultures of millet and soya bean. Mixed forages were treated with three levels of molasses: M0 (without molasses), M1, and M2 (2·5 and 5% fresh matter respectively). Inclusion of soya bean in millet crops resulted in decreased silage yield compared with millet alone. The highest yield was obtained from the ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean. Molasses‐treated silage had higher lactic acid, lower pH, and lower acid detergent fibre (ADF) and neutral detergent fibre (NDF). Silage produced from millet–soya bean intercrops exhibited enhanced fermentation, indicated by lower pH (3·64) and higher lactic acid (16·63 g kg−1 DM) than silage from monocultures. Intercropping ratios had lower water‐soluble carbohydrate, ADF and NDF than millet monoculture. Overall, an intercropping ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean was advantageous over other ratios in terms of higher yield, nutritive value and economic value. Abstract In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize ( Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops, such as millet ( Pennisetum glaucum L.), due to lack of water for irrigation. However, millet alone may not provide feed of sufficient quality and crude protein content for dairy cows. A field experiment was conducted in 2 years to evaluate (i) whether intercropping millet with a relatively drought‐tolerant soya bean cultivar ( Glycine max Merr, cv. Williams) could improve silage quality with minimum yield penalty, and (ii) if the application of molasses could further enhance the nutritive value of silage of millet–soya bean intercrops. There were three intercropping ratios (60% millet with 40% soya bean, 50% millet with 50% soya bean, 40% millet with 60% soya bean) and monocultures of millet and soya bean. Mixed forages were treated with three levels of molasses: M 0 (without molasses), M 1 , and M 2 (2·5 and 5% fresh matter respectively). Inclusion of soya bean in millet crops resulted in decreased silage yield compared with millet alone. The highest yield was obtained from the ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean. Molasses‐treated silage had higher lactic acid, lower pH, and lower acid detergent fibre ( ADF ) and neutral detergent fibre ( NDF ). Silage produced from millet–soya bean intercrops exhibited enhanced fermentation, indicated by lower pH (3·64) and higher lactic acid (16·63 g kg −1 DM) than silage from monocultures. Intercropping ratios had lower water‐soluble carbohydrate, ADF and NDF than millet monoculture. Overall, an intercropping ratio of 60% millet with 40% soya bean was advantageous over other ratios in terms of higher yield, nutritive value and economic value. |
Author | Sadeghpour, A. Jahanzad, E. Keshavarz Afshar, R. Hashemi, M. Hosseini, M. B. Barker, A. V. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: E. surname: Jahanzad fullname: Jahanzad, E. email: ejahanzad@psis.umass.edu, E. Jahanzad, Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, Bowditch Hall, Amherst, MA 01003, USA., ejahanzad@psis.umass.edu organization: Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, MA, Amherst, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: A. surname: Sadeghpour fullname: Sadeghpour, A. organization: Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, NY, Ithaca, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: M. surname: Hashemi fullname: Hashemi, M. organization: Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, MA, Amherst, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: R. surname: Keshavarz Afshar fullname: Keshavarz Afshar, R. organization: Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, MA, Amherst, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: M. B. surname: Hosseini fullname: Hosseini, M. B. organization: Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, University of Tehran, Karaj, Tehran, Iran – sequence: 6 givenname: A. V. surname: Barker fullname: Barker, A. V. organization: Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts, MA, Amherst, USA |
BookMark | eNp1kd9qFDEUh4NUcLv1wjcIeKPgtPkzk0wuZWlXYWmRtgjehDRzZk3NJGsyY91H8K1Nd9QLocnFgZzvCzn5HaOjEAMg9IqSU1rW2bbPp5QxKp6hBeWiqVit6iO0ILRmVcNq9gId53xPCJGK8wX6de282QLuIQ0QRjO6GPAuxd55eIftVxicNR7bOOxidoeuCR0GG0MsLQw_jJ9mK_Z4cN7DeCBy3Bt8BybgbYoPAbuAh-LYyY9TgnxgTC7HIySb4i6foOe98Rle_qlLdHtxfrP6UG2u1h9X7zeV5aIVlSFKtS2jrRTGmI5QRSzhStUdLQDwhkhC-64xpOFNeyek6jpietaDJPxxL9Gb-d4y5fcJ8qgHly14bwLEKWva1qKmTEpe0Nf_ofdxSqG8rlBcCEKbUpfo7UyVMXJO0OtdcoNJe02JfgxFl1D0IZTCns3sQ_nf_dOgXl9c_zWq2XB5hJ__DJO-aSG5bPTny7XeqC-Xn24Y1yv-G6yXn88 |
CODEN | GFSCDW |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_jam_14636 crossref_primary_10_1111_jam_14896 crossref_primary_10_3390_fermentation8120696 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2017_04_055 crossref_primary_10_29312_remexca_v15i2_3648 crossref_primary_10_3390_fermentation8040174 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2020_123773 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2018_05_097 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2020_123371 crossref_primary_10_5433_1679_0359_2019v40n5Supl1p2397 crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_8478cr20210482 crossref_primary_10_1080_09712119_2023_2165087 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13040764 crossref_primary_10_1111_gfs_12475 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anifeedsci_2023_115779 crossref_primary_10_5713_ajas_18_0886 crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture11050452 crossref_primary_10_3390_fermentation8040140 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2020_123655 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00203_021_02658_z crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_78217_1 crossref_primary_10_5713_ajas_20_0079 crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_387_1_012017 crossref_primary_10_1111_grs_12289 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1247254 |
Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00783.x 10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.11.001 10.1111/nph.13132 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1995.tb02320.x 10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00049-7 10.2527/1991.69114588x 10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.015 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00890.x 10.1007/s12155-014-9485-x 10.2134/agronj13.0589 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.021 10.1016/S0377-8401(97)81640-9 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 10.1201/9781420005271 10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c37 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79677-0 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60936-0 10.1021/ac60302a043 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.027 10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.077 10.1002/jsfa.2740350307 10.1002/jpln.201200062 10.2135/cropsci2015.02.0130 10.2134/agronj13.0542 10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900020014x 10.1111/gfs.12076 10.1021/jf60107a021 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.05.014 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd – notice: Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION 7QR 7ST 7TM 8FD C1K FR3 M7N P64 RC3 SOI |
DOI | 10.1111/gfs.12216 |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Chemoreception Abstracts Environment Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Environment Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Nucleic Acids Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Engineering Research Database Environment Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management |
DatabaseTitleList | Environment Abstracts Genetics Abstracts CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Agriculture |
EISSN | 1365-2494 |
EndPage | 594 |
ExternalDocumentID | 4240718051 10_1111_gfs_12216 GFS12216 ark_67375_WNG_L9ZNQT23_C |
Genre | article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Forage Program of University of Tehran – fundername: Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts |
GroupedDBID | ..I .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OB 1OC 29I 31~ 33P 3SF 4.4 4P2 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABHUG ABJNI ABPTK ABPVW ABWRO ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACIWK ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACSMX ACXBN ACXME ACXQS ADAWD ADBBV ADDAD ADEOM ADIZJ ADMGS ADOZA ADXAS ADZOD AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFPWT AFRAH AFVGU AFZJQ AGJLS AHBTC AHEFC AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CAG COF CS3 D-E D-F DC6 DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DROCM DRSTM DU5 EAD EAP EBD EBS ECGQY EDH EJD EMK EST ESX F00 F01 F04 FEDTE FZ0 G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- P2P P2W P2X P4D PALCI Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TUS UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WIH WIK WOHZO WQJ WRC WUPDE WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XOL ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~WT AAHBH AITYG HGLYW OIG AAYXX CITATION 7QR 7ST 7TM 8FD C1K FR3 M7N P64 RC3 SOI |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c3686-a0998821876aaad0190c03994d1c36e350701fd5a05358b679dd0af2fe7030303 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0142-5242 |
IngestDate | Sat Aug 17 02:39:58 EDT 2024 Fri Sep 13 05:31:33 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 01:27:26 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 01:10:29 EDT 2024 Wed Jan 17 04:59:47 EST 2024 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3686-a0998821876aaad0190c03994d1c36e350701fd5a05358b679dd0af2fe7030303 |
Notes | istex:59EBBC6B7B11FA0905229DAC1D9E1BEFFE5EBF41 ArticleID:GFS12216 Forage Program of University of Tehran ark:/67375/WNG-L9ZNQT23-C Stockbridge School of Agriculture, University of Massachusetts ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 1836601518 |
PQPubID | 1066342 |
PageCount | 11 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1846412773 proquest_journals_1836601518 crossref_primary_10_1111_gfs_12216 wiley_primary_10_1111_gfs_12216_GFS12216 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_L9ZNQT23_C |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2016-12 December 2016 2016-12-00 20161201 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2016-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2016 text: 2016-12 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford |
PublicationTitle | Grass and forage science |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Grass Forage Sci |
PublicationYear | 2016 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc |
References | Denek N., Can A., Avci M., Aksu T. and Durmaz A. (2011) The effect of molasses-based pre-fermented juice on the fermentation quality of first-cut lucerne silage. Grass and Forage Science, 66, 243-250. McDonald P., Henderson A.R. and Heron S.J.E. (1991) The biochemistry of silage, 2nd edn, pp. 167-183. Kent, UK: Chalcombe Publications. Esmaeili A., Sadeghpour A., Hosseini S.M.B., Jahanzad E., Chaichi M.R. and Hashemi M. (2011) Evaluation of seed yield and competition indices for intercropped annual medic-barley. International Journal of Plant Production, 4, 395-404. Alli I., Fairbairn R., Noroozi E. and Baker B.B. (1984) The effects of molasses on the fermentation of chopped whole-plant leucaena. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 35, 285-289. Baytok E., Aksu T., Karsli M.A. and Muruz H. (2005) The effects of formic acid, molasses and inoculant as silage additives on corn silage composition and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 29, 469-474. Umana R., Staples C.R., Bates D.B., Wilcox C.J. and Mahanna W.C. (1991) Effects of a microbial inoculant and (or) sugarcane molasses on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and digestibility of bermuda grass ensiled at two moisture contents. Journal of Animal Science, 69, 4588-4601. Fisher D.S. and Burns J.C. (1987) Quality analysis of summer annual forages. II. Effects of forage carbohydrate constituents on silage fermentation. Agronomy Journal, 79, 242-248. Eslamizadeh A., Kashani A., Siyadat S.A.A., Modhej A. and Lak S. (2015) Study of soybean forage at different planting dates intercropped with corn. Journal of Walia, 31, 108-112. Ghanbarzadeh S., Chaichi M.R., Hosseini S.M.B. and Sadeghpour A. (2010) Evaluation of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density on chemical analysis of corn forage and weed population in an agro-forestry system. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 22, 2387-2397. Hashemi M., Farsad A., Sadeghpour A., Weis S. and Herbert S.J. (2013) Cover crop seeding date influence on fall nitrogen recovery. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 176, 69-75. Zandvakili O.R., Allahdadi I., Mazaheri D., Akbari G.A., Jahanzad E. and Mirshekari M. (2013) Effect of different planting proportions and nitrogen fertilizer in intercropping forage sorghum and lima bean. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8, 6488-6498. Jahanzad E., Jorat M., Moghadam M., Sadeghpour A., Chaichi M.R. and Dashtaki M. (2013) Response of a new and a commonly grown forage sorghum cultivar to limited irrigation and planting density. Agricultural Water Management, 117, 62-69. Keshavarz Afshar R., Ansari Jovini M., Chaichi M.R. and Hashemi M. (2014) Grain sorghum response to Arbuscular mycorrhiza and phosphorus fertilizer under deficit irrigation. Agronomy Journal, 106, 1212-1218. Cherney R.F., Merry R.J., Williams A.P. and Tweed K.S. (1995) The effect of additives on the ensilage of forage of differing perennial ryegrass and white clover content. Grass and Forage Science, 50, 249-258. Lima-Orozco R.A., Castro-Algeria A. and Fievez V. (2012) Ensiled sorghum and soybean as ruminant feed in the tropics, with emphasis on Cuba. Grass and Forage Science, 68, 20-32. van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B. and Lewis B.A. (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 3583-3597. Restelatto R., Pavinato P. S., Sartor L. R. and Paixão S. J. (2014) Production and nutritional value of sorghum and black oat forages under nitrogen fertilization. Grass and Forage Science, 69, 693-704. SAS Institute (2003) SAS/STAT user's guide, version 9.1. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institute. Brooker R.W., Bennett A.E., Cong W.-F., Daniell T.J., George T.S., Hallett P.D., Hawes C., Pietro P.M., Iannetta P.P.M., Hamlyn G., Jones H.G., Karley A.J., Li L., McKenzie B.M., Pakeman R.J., Paterson E., Schöb C., Shen J., Squire G., Watson C.A., Zhang C., Zhang F., Zhang J. and White P.J. (2015) Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytologist, 206, 107-117. Sadeghpour A., Hashemi M., Dacosta M., Jahanzad E. and Herbert S.J. (2014a) Switchgrass establishment influenced by cover crop, tillage systems and weed control. BioEnergy Research, 7, 1402-1410. Tabatabaie S. M. H., Rafiee S., Keyhani A. and Heidari M. D. (2013) Energy use pattern and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and input costs for pear production in Iran. Renewable Energy, 51, 7-12. Titterton M. and Maasdorp B.V. (1997) Nutritional improvement of maize silage for dairying: mixed crop silages from sole and intercropped legumes and a long season variety of maize. 2. Ensilage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 69, 263-270. Rostamza M., Chaichi M.R., Jahansouz M.R. and Alimadadi A. (2011) Forage quality, water use and nitrogen utilization efficiencies of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) grown under different soil moisture and nitrogen levels. Agricultural Water Management, 98, 1607-1614. Sadeghpour A., Jahanzad E., Hashemi M., Esmaeili A. and Herbert S.J. (2013b) Intercropping annual medic with barley may improve total forage and crude protein yield in semi-arid conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 7, 1822-1828. Leibensperger R.Y. and Pitt R.E. (1988) Modelling the effects of formic acid and molasses on ensilage. Journal of Dairy Science, 71, 1220-1231. Sadeghpour A., Jahanzad E., Esmaeili A., Hosseini S.M.B. and Hashemi H. (2013a) Forage yield, quality and economic benefit of intercropped barley and annual medic in semi-arid conditions: additive series. Field Crops Research, 148, 43-48. Sadeghpour A., Hashemi M., Dacosta M., Gorlitsky E., Jahanzad E. and Herbert S.J. (2014b) Assessing winter cereals as cover crops for weed control in reduced-tillage switchgrass establishment. Industrial Crops and Products, 62, 522-525. AOAC (1990) Association of official analytical chemists, official methods of analysis, 15th edn. Arlington, VA, USA: AOAC. Jahanzad E., Sadeghpour A., Hosseini M.B., Barker A.V., Hashemi M. and Keshavarz Afshar R. (2015) Competition, nitrogen use efficiency, and productivity of millet-soybean intercropping in semi-arid conditions. Crop Science, 55, 2842-2851. Sadeghpour A. and Jahanzad E. (2012) Seed yield and yield components of intercropped barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and annual medic (Medicago scutellata L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 3, 47-50. Rafiee S., Avval S.H.M. and Mohammadi A. (2010) Modelling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran. Energy, 35, 3301-3306. Carter M.R. and Gregorich E.G. (2007) Soil sampling and methods of analysis, 2nd edn, pp. 1262. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. Sibanda S., Jingura R.M. and Topps J.H. (1997) The effect of level of inclusion of the legume Desmodium uncinatum and the use of molasses or ground maize as additives on the chemical composition of grass- and maize-legume silages. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 68, 295-305. Okalebo J.R., Gathua K.W. and Woomer P. L. (1993) Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis. A working manual, pp. 116-124. Nairobi, Kenya: Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme (TSBF). Amanloo A. and Mobtaker H.G. (2013) Energy balance and sensitivity analysis of inputs for forage maize production in Iran. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 5, 377-384. Jahanzad E., Sadeghpour A., Hosseini M.B., Barker A.V., Hashemi M. and Zandvakili O.R. (2014) Silage yield and nutritive value of millet-soybean intercrops as influenced by nitrogen application. Agronomy Journal, 106, 1993-2000. Ottenstein D.M. and Bartley D.A. (1971) Improved gas chromatography separation of free acids C2-C5 in dilute solution. Analytical Chemistry, 43, 952-955. Wiseman H.G., Mallack J.C. and Jacobson W.C. (1960) Silage analysis. Determination of sugar in silages and forages. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 8, 78-80. Fehr W.R., Caviness C.E., Burmood D.T. and Pennington J.S. (1971) Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merr. Crop Science, 11, 929-931. Zandvakili O.R., Allahdadi I., Mazaheri D., Akbari G.A., Jahanzad E. and Mirshekari M. (2012) Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of forage sorghum and lima bean under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes in additive-replacement series. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6, 223-235. Andrews D.J. and Kumar K.A. (1992) Pearl millet for food, feed, and forage. Advances in Agronomy, 48, 89-139. BOSTID (Board on Science and Technology for International Development) (1996) Lost crops of Africa grains. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy of Science. 1987; 79 2014b; 62 1995; 50 1971; 43 2010; 35 2015; 31 1991; 74 1997; 69 2015; 55 1997; 68 1996 2007 2014; 69 2011; 98 1994 1960; 8 1993 2015; 206 2003 2013a; 148 1991 2011; 4 2013; 8 2013; 5 2005; 29 1988; 71 2010; 22 1971; 11 2014; 106 2012; 3 1991; 69 1990 2013; 51 1984; 35 2013; 117 2013b; 7 2011; 66 1992; 48 2013; 176 2012; 6 2012; 68 2014a; 7 e_1_2_7_4_1 SAS Institute (e_1_2_7_38_1) 2003 e_1_2_7_9_1 Amanloo A. (e_1_2_7_3_1) 2013; 5 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_40_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_43_1 Zandvakili O.R. (e_1_2_7_45_1) 2012; 6 e_1_2_7_12_1 Okalebo J.R. (e_1_2_7_27_1) 1993 e_1_2_7_44_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 Paterson J.A. (e_1_2_7_29_1) 1994 McDonald P. (e_1_2_7_25_1) 1991 Ghanbarzadeh S. (e_1_2_7_17_1) 2010; 22 Esmaeili A. (e_1_2_7_14_1) 2011; 4 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 AOAC (e_1_2_7_5_1) 1990 e_1_2_7_39_1 Sadeghpour A. (e_1_2_7_33_1) 2012; 3 Sadeghpour A. (e_1_2_7_35_1) 2013; 7 Zandvakili O.R. (e_1_2_7_46_1) 2013; 8 Baytok E. (e_1_2_7_6_1) 2005; 29 Eslamizadeh A. (e_1_2_7_13_1) 2015; 31 Muck R.E. (e_1_2_7_26_1) 2003 BOSTID (Board on Science and Technology for International Development) (e_1_2_7_7_1) 1996 |
References_xml | – volume: 69 start-page: 693 year: 2014 end-page: 704 article-title: Production and nutritional value of sorghum and black oat forages under nitrogen fertilization publication-title: Grass and Forage Science – volume: 79 start-page: 242 year: 1987 end-page: 248 article-title: Quality analysis of summer annual forages. II. Effects of forage carbohydrate constituents on silage fermentation publication-title: Agronomy Journal – volume: 22 start-page: 2387 year: 2010 end-page: 2397 article-title: Evaluation of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density on chemical analysis of corn forage and weed population in an agro‐forestry system publication-title: Asian Journal of Chemistry – volume: 68 start-page: 295 year: 1997 end-page: 305 article-title: The effect of level of inclusion of the legume and the use of molasses or ground maize as additives on the chemical composition of grass‐ and maize‐legume silages publication-title: Animal Feed Science and Technology – volume: 11 start-page: 929 year: 1971 end-page: 931 article-title: Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, (L.) Merr publication-title: Crop Science – volume: 29 start-page: 469 year: 2005 end-page: 474 article-title: The effects of formic acid, molasses and inoculant as silage additives on corn silage composition and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep publication-title: Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences – year: 2007 – volume: 3 start-page: 47 year: 2012 end-page: 50 article-title: Seed yield and yield components of intercropped barley ( L.) and annual medic ( L.) publication-title: Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering – volume: 66 start-page: 243 year: 2011 end-page: 250 article-title: The effect of molasses‐based pre‐fermented juice on the fermentation quality of first‐cut lucerne silage publication-title: Grass and Forage Science – start-page: 1085 year: 1996 end-page: 1121 – year: 2003 – year: 1996 – start-page: 167 year: 1991 end-page: 183 – volume: 117 start-page: 62 year: 2013 end-page: 69 article-title: Response of a new and a commonly grown forage sorghum cultivar to limited irrigation and planting density publication-title: Agricultural Water Management – volume: 68 start-page: 20 year: 2012 end-page: 32 article-title: Ensiled sorghum and soybean as ruminant feed in the tropics, with emphasis on Cuba publication-title: Grass and Forage Science – volume: 7 start-page: 1402 year: 2014a end-page: 1410 article-title: Switchgrass establishment influenced by cover crop, tillage systems and weed control publication-title: BioEnergy Research – start-page: 251 year: 2003 end-page: 304 – year: 1990 – volume: 5 start-page: 377 year: 2013 end-page: 384 article-title: Energy balance and sensitivity analysis of inputs for forage maize production in Iran publication-title: International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences – volume: 62 start-page: 522 year: 2014b end-page: 525 article-title: Assessing winter cereals as cover crops for weed control in reduced‐tillage switchgrass establishment publication-title: Industrial Crops and Products – volume: 48 start-page: 89 year: 1992 end-page: 139 article-title: Pearl millet for food, feed, and forage publication-title: Advances in Agronomy – volume: 106 start-page: 1212 year: 2014 end-page: 1218 article-title: Grain sorghum response to and phosphorus fertilizer under deficit irrigation publication-title: Agronomy Journal – volume: 74 start-page: 3583 year: 1991 end-page: 3597 article-title: Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non‐starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – volume: 98 start-page: 1607 year: 2011 end-page: 1614 article-title: Forage quality, water use and nitrogen utilization efficiencies of pearl millet ( L.) grown under different soil moisture and nitrogen levels publication-title: Agricultural Water Management – volume: 71 start-page: 1220 year: 1988 end-page: 1231 article-title: Modelling the effects of formic acid and molasses on ensilage publication-title: Journal of Dairy Science – volume: 69 start-page: 263 year: 1997 end-page: 270 article-title: Nutritional improvement of maize silage for dairying: mixed crop silages from sole and intercropped legumes and a long season variety of maize. 2. Ensilage publication-title: Animal Feed Science and Technology – start-page: 9 year: 1994 end-page: 11 – volume: 106 start-page: 1993 year: 2014 end-page: 2000 article-title: Silage yield and nutritive value of millet–soybean intercrops as influenced by nitrogen application publication-title: Agronomy Journal – volume: 51 start-page: 7 year: 2013 end-page: 12 article-title: Energy use pattern and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs and input costs for pear production in Iran publication-title: Renewable Energy – volume: 69 start-page: 4588 year: 1991 end-page: 4601 article-title: Effects of a microbial inoculant and (or) sugarcane molasses on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and digestibility of bermuda grass ensiled at two moisture contents publication-title: Journal of Animal Science – volume: 8 start-page: 78 year: 1960 end-page: 80 article-title: Silage analysis. Determination of sugar in silages and forages publication-title: Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry – volume: 50 start-page: 249 year: 1995 end-page: 258 article-title: The effect of additives on the ensilage of forage of differing perennial ryegrass and white clover content publication-title: Grass and Forage Science – volume: 6 start-page: 223 year: 2012 end-page: 235 article-title: Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of forage sorghum and lima bean under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes in additive‐replacement series publication-title: Journal of Agricultural Science – volume: 31 start-page: 108 year: 2015 end-page: 112 article-title: Study of soybean forage at different planting dates intercropped with corn publication-title: Journal of Walia – volume: 148 start-page: 43 year: 2013a end-page: 48 article-title: Forage yield, quality and economic benefit of intercropped barley and annual medic in semi‐arid conditions: additive series publication-title: Field Crops Research – volume: 206 start-page: 107 year: 2015 end-page: 117 article-title: Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology publication-title: New Phytologist – volume: 35 start-page: 3301 year: 2010 end-page: 3306 article-title: Modelling and sensitivity analysis of energy inputs for apple production in Iran publication-title: Energy – start-page: 116 year: 1993 end-page: 124 – volume: 35 start-page: 285 year: 1984 end-page: 289 article-title: The effects of molasses on the fermentation of chopped whole‐plant leucaena publication-title: Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture – volume: 8 start-page: 6488 year: 2013 end-page: 6498 article-title: Effect of different planting proportions and nitrogen fertilizer in intercropping forage sorghum and lima bean publication-title: African Journal of Agricultural Research – volume: 176 start-page: 69 year: 2013 end-page: 75 article-title: Cover crop seeding date influence on fall nitrogen recovery publication-title: Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science – volume: 7 start-page: 1822 year: 2013b end-page: 1828 article-title: Intercropping annual medic with barley may improve total forage and crude protein yield in semi‐arid conditions publication-title: Australian Journal of Crop Science – volume: 43 start-page: 952 year: 1971 end-page: 955 article-title: Improved gas chromatography separation of free acids C2–C5 in dilute solution publication-title: Analytical Chemistry – volume: 4 start-page: 395 year: 2011 end-page: 404 article-title: Evaluation of seed yield and competition indices for intercropped annual medic–barley publication-title: International Journal of Plant Production – volume: 55 start-page: 2842 year: 2015 end-page: 2851 article-title: Competition, nitrogen use efficiency, and productivity of millet‐soybean intercropping in semi‐arid conditions publication-title: Crop Science – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00783.x – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.11.001 – volume: 3 start-page: 47 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 article-title: Seed yield and yield components of intercropped barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and annual medic (Medicago scutellata L.) publication-title: Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering contributor: fullname: Sadeghpour A. – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1111/nph.13132 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.1995.tb02320.x – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00049-7 – volume-title: SAS/STAT user's guide, version 9.1 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 contributor: fullname: SAS Institute – ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 doi: 10.2527/1991.69114588x – volume-title: Association of official analytical chemists, official methods of analysis year: 1990 ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 contributor: fullname: AOAC – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.04.015 – volume: 5 start-page: 377 year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 article-title: Energy balance and sensitivity analysis of inputs for forage maize production in Iran publication-title: International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences contributor: fullname: Amanloo A. – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2012.00890.x – volume-title: Lost crops of Africa grains year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 contributor: fullname: BOSTID (Board on Science and Technology for International Development) – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.1007/s12155-014-9485-x – start-page: 9 volume-title: Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 contributor: fullname: Paterson J.A. – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj13.0589 – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.03.021 – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(97)81640-9 – ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1201/9781420005271 – volume: 7 start-page: 1822 year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 article-title: Intercropping annual medic with barley may improve total forage and crude protein yield in semi‐arid conditions publication-title: Australian Journal of Crop Science contributor: fullname: Sadeghpour A. – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c37 – start-page: 251 volume-title: Silage science and technology year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 contributor: fullname: Muck R.E. – start-page: 167 volume-title: The biochemistry of silage year: 1991 ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 contributor: fullname: McDonald P. – start-page: 116 volume-title: Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis. A working manual year: 1993 ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 contributor: fullname: Okalebo J.R. – volume: 29 start-page: 469 year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 article-title: The effects of formic acid, molasses and inoculant as silage additives on corn silage composition and ruminal fermentation characteristics in sheep publication-title: Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences contributor: fullname: Baytok E. – volume: 22 start-page: 2387 year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 article-title: Evaluation of nitrogen fertilizer and plant density on chemical analysis of corn forage and weed population in an agro‐forestry system publication-title: Asian Journal of Chemistry contributor: fullname: Ghanbarzadeh S. – volume: 4 start-page: 395 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 article-title: Evaluation of seed yield and competition indices for intercropped annual medic–barley publication-title: International Journal of Plant Production contributor: fullname: Esmaeili A. – volume: 6 start-page: 223 year: 2012 ident: e_1_2_7_45_1 article-title: Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative traits of forage sorghum and lima bean under different nitrogen fertilizer regimes in additive‐replacement series publication-title: Journal of Agricultural Science contributor: fullname: Zandvakili O.R. – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79677-0 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60936-0 – volume: 31 start-page: 108 year: 2015 ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 article-title: Study of soybean forage at different planting dates intercropped with corn publication-title: Journal of Walia contributor: fullname: Eslamizadeh A. – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.1021/ac60302a043 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.09.027 – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.08.077 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740350307 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1002/jpln.201200062 – volume: 8 start-page: 6488 year: 2013 ident: e_1_2_7_46_1 article-title: Effect of different planting proportions and nitrogen fertilizer in intercropping forage sorghum and lima bean publication-title: African Journal of Agricultural Research contributor: fullname: Zandvakili O.R. – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.02.0130 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj13.0542 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.2134/agronj1987.00021962007900020014x – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 doi: 10.1111/gfs.12076 – ident: e_1_2_7_44_1 doi: 10.1021/jf60107a021 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.05.014 |
SSID | ssj0007933 |
Score | 2.2790794 |
Snippet | In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops, such as... Abstract In recent years, dairy farmers in semi‐arid regions have shifted from maize ( Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought‐tolerant crops,... In recent years, dairy farmers in semi-arid regions have shifted from maize (Zea mays L.) as their primary source of feed to drought-tolerant crops, such as... |
SourceID | proquest crossref wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Publisher |
StartPage | 584 |
SubjectTerms | Glycine max intercropping millet molasses nutritive value Pennisetum glaucum silage soya bean Zea mays |
Title | Silage fermentation profile, chemical composition and economic evaluation of millet and soya bean grown in monocultures and as intercrops |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-L9ZNQT23-C/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fgfs.12216 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1836601518/abstract/ https://search.proquest.com/docview/1846412773 |
Volume | 71 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Ra9RAEB5KfakPVlvF1LZsRcQHc2Q3e0kOn0rxWooe1LZYRAi72d2jtCRyuQPtP-i_dmazubaCIJKXQCbJZndn9pvNzDcAb_KRSexIuxihhIslrpixdskoVjihDS6fjmv6o_t5kh2dy-OL4cUKfOhzYTp-iOWGG2mGt9ek4Eq395R86toBF4IT3TYR6REg-nJHHZWHMvJckrMlRWAVoiie5Z0P1qJH1K0_HwDN-3DVrzfjdfjet7QLM7kaLOZ6UN38QeL4n5_yFJ4EHMr2u4nzDFZsvQGP96ezwMVhN-H29PIarQ1zaLxDhlLNQo3v96wKTAOMgtJD5BdTtWE2pDqzOyJx1jhG5Y3s3Eu0zS_FtFU1m9ImALusGSpDE17cehnVMmKymFGFsfY5nI8_nh0cxaFyQ1ylWZHFCnEnQneOplYpZShfvUoQCknDUcCmCEIT7sxQEbtMoTOcMSZRTjhLBgiPF7BaN7V9CawQ2lpeVU67Qgr0ZzJtRK4F-nXSpkZH8Lofw_JHR9BR9o4N9mvp-zWCt350lxJqdkURbfmw_Do5LD-Nvk1OzkRaHkSw3Q9_GZQZH1GkGfqtQ15EsLe8jGpI_1ZUbZsFychMcpHnaQTv_Fj_vTXl4fjUn2z9u-grWEOolnWBNNuwOp8t7A7Cobne9fP-N6D6Bxw |
link.rule.ids | 315,786,790,1382,27957,27958,46329,46753 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3di9QwEB_Ouwf1wW-xemoUER_s0qTpx4Ivx-HeqnsLent4HEhImmQ57miP7S6o_4H_tZM03bsTBJG-FDpt0yQz-U068xuAV8VQJ2aobIxQwsYcV8xY2WQYS5zQGpdPS5X7o7s_zceH_ONRdrQB7_pcmI4fYr3h5jTD22un4G5D-pKWz207oIzR_Bpsobpn3qH6ckEeVYRC8pQ7d4uzwCvk4njWt15ZjbZcx36_AjUvA1a_4oxuw7e-rV2gyelgtVSD6ucfNI7_-zF34FaAomSnmzt3YcPU9-DmznwR6DjMffh1cHKGBodYtN8hSakmocz3W1IFsgHi4tJD8BeRtSYmZDuTCy5x0ljiKhyZpZdomx-SKCNrMnf7AOSkJqgPTXhx62VkSxyZxcIVGWsfwOHo_Wx3HIfiDXGV5mUeS4SeiN4pWlsppXYp61WCaIhrigImRRyaUKsz6QhmSpXjpNGJtMwaZ4PweAibdVObR0BKpoyhVWWVLTlDlyZXmhWKoWvHTapVBC_7QRTnHUeH6H0b7Ffh-zWC13541xJyceqC2opMfJ3uicnwePp5xlKxG8F2P_4i6DM-okxzdF0zWkbwYn0ZNdH9XpG1aVZOhuecsqJII3jjB_vvrRF7owN_8vjfRZ_D9fFsfyImH6afnsANRG55F1ezDZvLxco8RXS0VM-8EvwGFQwLPg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3_a9QwFH_MDcT94HdZdWoUEX-wR5Pm0h7-NDZvU-ehbsMhQkia5BiTdlzvQP0P_K99SdPbJggi_aXQ1zZN8l4-L33v8wCeFSOT2ZF2KUIJl3JcMVPtslGqcEIbXD4d1f6P7vuJ2Dvib4-Hxyvwqs-F6fghlhtuXjOCvfYKfmbcBSWfunZAGaPiCqxxkTM_pXc-nXNHFbGOPOXe2-Is0gr5MJ7lrZcWozXfr98vIc2LeDUsOOMb8LVvahdncjpYzPWg-vkHi-N_fstNuB6BKNnqZs4tWLH1bVjfms4iGYe9A78OTr6huSEOrXdMUapJLPL9klSRaoD4qPQY-kVUbYiNuc7knEmcNI74-kZ2HiTa5oci2qqaTP0uADmpCWpDE1_cBhnVEk9lMfMlxtq7cDR-fbi9l8bSDWmVi1KkCoEnYneKtlYpZXzCepUhFuKGooDNEYVm1Jmh8vQypRY4ZUymHHPWWyA87sFq3dR2A0jJtLW0qpx2JWfo0AhtWKEZOnbc5kYn8LQfQ3nWMXTI3rPBfpWhXxN4HkZ3KaFmpz6krRjKz5NduT_6Mvl4yHK5ncBmP_wyajM-oswFOq5DWibwZHkZ9dD_XFG1bRZehgtOWVHkCbwIY_331sjd8UE4uf_voo_h6oedsdx_M3n3AK4hbBNdUM0mrM5nC_sQodFcPwoq8BvzFgnt |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Silage+fermentation+profile%2C+chemical+composition+and+economic+evaluation+of+millet+and+soya+bean+grown+in+monocultures+and+as+intercrops&rft.jtitle=Grass+and+forage+science&rft.au=Jahanzad%2C+E.&rft.au=Sadeghpour%2C+A.&rft.au=Hashemi%2C+M.&rft.au=Keshavarz+Afshar%2C+R.&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.issn=0142-5242&rft.eissn=1365-2494&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=584&rft.epage=594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fgfs.12216&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fgfs.12216&rft.externalDocID=GFS12216 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0142-5242&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0142-5242&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0142-5242&client=summon |