Baseline Stimulability Predicts Patterns of Response to Traditional and Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment for Residual Speech Sound Disorder
Purpose: This study aimed to identify predictors of response to treatment for residual speech sound disorder (RSSD) affecting English rhotics. Progress was tracked during an initial phase of traditional motor-based treatment and a longer phase of treatment incorporating ultrasound biofeedback. Based...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research Vol. 65; no. 8; pp. 2860 - 2880 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
01.08.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose: This study aimed to identify predictors of response to treatment for residual speech sound disorder (RSSD) affecting English rhotics. Progress was tracked during an initial phase of traditional motor-based treatment and a longer phase of treatment incorporating ultrasound biofeedback. Based on previous literature, we focused on baseline stimulability and sensory acuity as predictors of interest. Method: Thirty-three individuals aged 9-15 years with residual distortions of [voiced alveolar approximant] received a course of individual intervention comprising 1 week of intensive traditional treatment and 9 weeks of ultrasound biofeedback treatment. Stimulability for [voiced alveolar approximant] was probed prior to treatment, after the traditional treatment phase, and after the end of all treatment. Accuracy of [voiced alveolar approximant] production in each probe was assessed with an acoustic measure: normalized third formant (F3)-second formant (F2) distance. Model-based clustering analysis was applied to these acoustic measures to identify different average trajectories of progress over the course of treatment. The resulting clusters were compared with respect to acuity in auditory and somatosensory domains. Results: All but four individuals were judged to exhibit a clinically significant response to the combined course of treatment. Two major clusters were identified. The "low stimulability" cluster was characterized by very low accuracy at baseline, minimal response to traditional treatment, and strong response to ultrasound biofeedback. The "high stimulability" group was more accurate at baseline and made significant gains in both traditional and ultrasound biofeedback phases of treatment. The clusters did not differ with respect to sensory acuity. Conclusions: This research accords with clinical intuition in finding that individuals who are more stimulable at baseline are more likely to respond to traditional intervention, whereas less stimulable individuals may derive greater relative benefit from biofeedback. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This study aimed to identify predictors of response to treatment for residual speech sound disorder (RSSD) affecting English rhotics. Progress was tracked during an initial phase of traditional motor-based treatment and a longer phase of treatment incorporating ultrasound biofeedback. Based on previous literature, we focused on baseline stimulability and sensory acuity as predictors of interest.
Thirty-three individuals aged 9-15 years with residual distortions of /ɹ/ received a course of individual intervention comprising 1 week of intensive traditional treatment and 9 weeks of ultrasound biofeedback treatment. Stimulability for /ɹ/ was probed prior to treatment, after the traditional treatment phase, and after the end of all treatment. Accuracy of /ɹ/ production in each probe was assessed with an acoustic measure: normalized third formant (F3)-second formant (F2) distance. Model-based clustering analysis was applied to these acoustic measures to identify different average trajectories of progress over the course of treatment. The resulting clusters were compared with respect to acuity in auditory and somatosensory domains.
All but four individuals were judged to exhibit a clinically significant response to the combined course of treatment. Two major clusters were identified. The "low stimulability" cluster was characterized by very low accuracy at baseline, minimal response to traditional treatment, and strong response to ultrasound biofeedback. The "high stimulability" group was more accurate at baseline and made significant gains in both traditional and ultrasound biofeedback phases of treatment. The clusters did not differ with respect to sensory acuity.
This research accords with clinical intuition in finding that individuals who are more stimulable at baseline are more likely to respond to traditional intervention, whereas less stimulable individuals may derive greater relative benefit from biofeedback.
https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.20422236. Purpose: This study aimed to identify predictors of response to treatment for residual speech sound disorder (RSSD) affecting English rhotics. Progress was tracked during an initial phase of traditional motor-based treatment and a longer phase of treatment incorporating ultrasound biofeedback. Based on previous literature, we focused on baseline stimulability and sensory acuity as predictors of interest. Method: Thirty-three individuals aged 9-15 years with residual distortions of [voiced alveolar approximant] received a course of individual intervention comprising 1 week of intensive traditional treatment and 9 weeks of ultrasound biofeedback treatment. Stimulability for [voiced alveolar approximant] was probed prior to treatment, after the traditional treatment phase, and after the end of all treatment. Accuracy of [voiced alveolar approximant] production in each probe was assessed with an acoustic measure: normalized third formant (F3)-second formant (F2) distance. Model-based clustering analysis was applied to these acoustic measures to identify different average trajectories of progress over the course of treatment. The resulting clusters were compared with respect to acuity in auditory and somatosensory domains. Results: All but four individuals were judged to exhibit a clinically significant response to the combined course of treatment. Two major clusters were identified. The "low stimulability" cluster was characterized by very low accuracy at baseline, minimal response to traditional treatment, and strong response to ultrasound biofeedback. The "high stimulability" group was more accurate at baseline and made significant gains in both traditional and ultrasound biofeedback phases of treatment. The clusters did not differ with respect to sensory acuity. Conclusions: This research accords with clinical intuition in finding that individuals who are more stimulable at baseline are more likely to respond to traditional intervention, whereas less stimulable individuals may derive greater relative benefit from biofeedback. Purpose: This study aimed to identify predictors of response to treatment for residual speech sound disorder (RSSD) affecting English rhotics. Progress was tracked during an initial phase of traditional motor-based treatment and a longer phase of treatment incorporating ultrasound biofeedback. Based on previous literature, we focused on baseline stimulability and sensory acuity as predictors of interest. Method: Thirty-three individuals aged 9-15 years with residual distortions of /.I/ received a course of individual intervention comprising 1 week of intensive traditional treatment and 9 weeks of ultrasound biofeedback treatment. Stimulability for /.I/ was probed prior to treatment, after the traditional treatment phase, and after the end of all treatment. Accuracy of /.I/ production in each probe was assessed with an acoustic measure: normalized third formant (F3)-second formant (F2) distance. Model-based clustering analysis was applied to these acoustic measures to identify different average trajectories of progress over the course of treatment. The resulting clusters were compared with respect to acuity in auditory and somatosensory domains. Results: All but four individuals were judged to exhibit a clinically significant response to the combined course of treatment. Two major clusters were identified. The "low stimulability" cluster was characterized by very low accuracy at baseline, minimal response to traditional treatment, and strong response to ultrasound biofeedback. The "high stimulability" group was more accurate at baseline and made significant gains in both traditional and ultrasound biofeedback phases of treatment. The clusters did not differ with respect to sensory acuity. Conclusions: This research accords with clinical intuition in finding that individuals who are more stimulable at baseline are more likely to respond to traditional intervention, whereas less stimulable individuals may derive greater relative benefit from biofeedback. Purpose: This study aimed to identify predictors of response to treatment for residual speech sound disorder (RSSD) affecting English rhotics. Progress was tracked during an initial phase of traditional motor-based treatment and a longer phase of treatment incorporating ultrasound biofeedback. Based on previous literature, we focused on baseline stimulability and sensory acuity as predictors of interest. Method: Thirty-three individuals aged 9–15 years with residual distortions of /ɹ/ received a course of individual intervention comprising 1 week of intensive traditional treatment and 9 weeks of ultrasound biofeedback treatment. Stimulability for /ɹ/ was probed prior to treatment, after the traditional treatment phase, and after the end of all treatment. Accuracy of /ɹ/ production in each probe was assessed with an acoustic measure: normalized third formant (F3)–second formant (F2) distance. Model-based clustering analysis was applied to these acoustic measures to identify different average trajectories of progress over the course of treatment. The resulting clusters were compared with respect to acuity in auditory and somatosensory domains. Results: All but four individuals were judged to exhibit a clinically significant response to the combined course of treatment. Two major clusters were identified. The “low stimulability” cluster was characterized by very low accuracy at baseline, minimal response to traditional treatment, and strong response to ultrasound biofeedback. The “high stimulability” group was more accurate at baseline and made significant gains in both traditional and ultrasound biofeedback phases of treatment. The clusters did not differ with respect to sensory acuity. Conclusions: This research accords with clinical intuition in finding that individuals who are more stimulable at baseline are more likely to respond to traditional intervention, whereas less stimulable individuals may derive greater relative benefit from biofeedback. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.20422236 |
Author | McAllister, Tara Boyce, Suzanne Kabakoff, Heather Scott, Marc Preston, Jonathan L Whalen, D. H Eads, Amanda |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: McAllister, Tara – sequence: 2 fullname: Eads, Amanda – sequence: 3 fullname: Kabakoff, Heather – sequence: 4 fullname: Scott, Marc – sequence: 5 fullname: Boyce, Suzanne – sequence: 6 fullname: Whalen, D. H – sequence: 7 fullname: Preston, Jonathan L |
BackLink | http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1361204$$DView record in ERIC https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35944047$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpFkd1OFTEUhRuDkR99AqNp4vXI7u_MXAqiSE4i4cD1pNPuxuKc6bHtXPAMvDSFg7Bv9kr6rZXsrkOyN8cZCfnI4CsDKY85cD5crFfnVw3nDQDT7A05YEp1Tc-A71UNPW-k6Lp9cpjzLdRhUr8j-0L1UoJsD8j9ick4hRnpuoTNMpkxTKHc0cuELtiS6aUpBdOcafT0CvM2zhlpifQ6GRdKiLOZqJkdvZlKMjkuVZ6E6BHdaOzfiqEpG5wL9TE9BgS3VMd6i2j_0PUT_z3kmBym9-StN1PGD8_7iNz8OLs-PW9Wv3_-Ov22aqzQbWmcFCNzGhmiMlr7TrXcMtnpUXovsPegpVCj5kp56K3vVWV6C5pjZwBbcUS-7HK3Kf5bMJfhNi6pHpIH3oLudKs5VErsKJtizgn9sE1hY9LdwGB4LGB4LWCo4qmA6vr8nL2MG3Qvnv8_XoFPOwBTsC_PZxdMaMZBigc7OI7Y |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_02699206_2023_2186765 crossref_primary_10_1044_2022_AJSLP_22_00144 crossref_primary_10_1044_2023_JSLHR_22_00658 crossref_primary_10_1044_2023_JSLHR_22_00622 |
Cites_doi | 10.1044/jshr.1501.179 10.1016/0021-9924(96)00012-3 10.1044/1058-0360.0701.81 10.1044/jslhr.4104.941 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00084 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0248 10.1080/17549507.2017.1359334 10.1038/nrn3158 10.1044/jshr.2004.694 10.1121/1.2773966 10.1515/ling.1968.6.44.29 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0256) 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0232 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00108 10.1121/1.3493430 10.1044/jshd.4404.504 10.1016/0021-9924(74)90038-0 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00216 10.32614/RJ-2016-021 10.1121/1.4784878 10.1044/jslhr.4206.1461 10.1371/journal.pone.0172022 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 10.1111/1460-6984.12259 10.1121/1.426686 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00444 10.1006/jpho.2000.0121 10.1055/s-0035-1562905 10.1093/comjnl/41.8.578 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00437 10.1044/0161-1461.2201.334 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025) 10.1044/jshr.1003.428 10.1044/jshd.5402.193 10.1044/jshd.4001.92 10.7551/mitpress/10471.001.0001 10.1177/001440296603200705 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104365 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.032 10.2466/pms.1974.38.1.11 10.1044/jshd.5101.03 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0103) 10.1080/02699206.2018.1477834 10.1055/s-0039-1677761 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00012 10.1111/1460-6984.12478 10.1080/02699200110069410 10.1016/0021-9924(87)90027-X 10.1111/1460-6984.12610 10.1055/s-0035-1562909 10.1080/02699206.2020.1739749 10.1044/2021_PERSP-20-00218 10.2307/2532201 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.03.007 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.11.003 10.1007/s11749-009-0138-x 10.1016/0021-9924(95)00058-X 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0441 10.1121/1.3593366 10.1055/s-0035-1562911 10.3109/13682826809011454 10.1080/02701367.2001.10608943 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0257) 10.2466/pms.1971.33.3.831 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/017) 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0261 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007321 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224 10.3109/02699206.2012.682695 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/095) 10.1044/1058-0360.0804.347 10.1080/00222895.1990.10735527 10.1044/2020_PERSP-20-00191 10.1121/1.1567280 10.1214/aos/1176344136 10.3390/foods9111594 10.1186/s12887-020-1941-5 10.1111/jtxs.12076 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0034 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00162 10.1007/s007840050035 10.2466/pms.1971.33.3.711 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0083) 10.1044/jshr.3406.1318 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00060 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.10.002 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0519 10.3109/02699209508985321 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0031 10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00058-2 10.1044/jshd.2302.124 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0122 10.1080/026992099299211 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Aug 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Aug 2022 |
DBID | 7SW BJH BNH BNI BNJ BNO ERI PET REK WWN CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 0-V 3V. 7RV 7T9 7X7 7XB 88B 88E 88G 88I 88J 8A4 8AF 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AFKRA ALSLI AZQEC BENPR CCPQU CJNVE CPGLG CRLPW DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH HCIFZ K9. KB0 M0P M0S M1P M2M M2O M2P M2R MBDVC NAPCQ PQEDU PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PSYQQ Q9U S0X |
DOI | 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00161 |
DatabaseName | ERIC ERIC (Ovid) ERIC ERIC ERIC (Legacy Platform) ERIC( SilverPlatter ) ERIC ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform) Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) ERIC Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】 ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Education Database (Alumni Edition) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database (Alumni) Science Database (Alumni Edition) Social Science Database (Alumni Edition) Education Periodicals STEM Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) ProQuest Central Essentials AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Education Collection Linguistics Collection Linguistics Database ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student Research Library Prep SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Education Journals Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Psychology Journals (ProQuest) ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Science Journals Social Science Database (ProQuest) Research Library (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest One Education ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic SIRS Editorial |
DatabaseTitle | ERIC MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef ProQuest One Education ProQuest One Psychology Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials SIRS Editorial ProQuest Social Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest AP Science ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Linguistics Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Social Science Premium Collection Education Collection ProQuest Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Education Journals ProQuest Science Journals ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) ProQuest Professional Education ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Social Science Journals ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Linguistics Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Education Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE ERIC ProQuest One Education CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: ERI name: ERIC url: https://eric.ed.gov/ sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Languages & Literatures Social Welfare & Social Work |
EISSN | 1558-9102 |
ERIC | EJ1361204 |
EndPage | 2880 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1044_2022_JSLHR_22_00161 35944047 EJ1361204 |
Genre | Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GeographicLocations | New York (New York) |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: New York (New York) |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS grantid: F31 DC018197 – fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS grantid: R01 DC013668 – fundername: NIDCD NIH HHS grantid: R01 DC017476 |
GroupedDBID | --- --Z -W8 -~X .GJ .GO 0-V 04C 0R~ 186 18M 1HT 29L 36B 3EH 3V. 4.4 53G 5GY 6NX 6PF 7RV 7SW 7X7 85S 88E 88I 8A4 8AF 8FI 8FJ 8G5 8R4 8R5 AAHSB AAWTL AAYRB ABDBF ABIVO ABOPQ ABPPZ ABTAH ABUWG ABWJO ABZEH ACGFO ACGOD ACHQT ACNCT ACUXI ADBBV ADOJX AENEX AERSA AFKRA AGHSJ AHMBA AI. AIKWM ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI ARALO AZQEC B-7 BCR BENPR BJH BKEYQ BLC BMSDO BNH BNI BNJ BNO BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU CJNVE CPGLG CRLPW CS3 DU5 DWQXO EAD EAP EAS EBD EBO EBS ECE ECF ECT EDJ EIHBH EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ERI ESX EX3 F5P F9R FJW FYUFA G8K GNUQQ GUQSH H13 HCIFZ HMCUK HZ~ H~9 I-F IAO ICO IEA IER IHR IHW IN- INH INIJC INR IOF IPO IPY ITC M0P M1P M2M M2O M2P M2Q M2R MLAFT MVM NAPCQ O9- OHT P-O P2P PADUT PCD PEA PET PQEDU PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PSYQQ Q2X QF4 QM7 QN7 QO4 QO5 REK RWL S0X S10 SJA SV3 TAE TH9 TN5 TUS TWZ UHB UKHRP UPT VH1 VJK VQA WH7 WOW WQ9 WWN YCJ YQT ZCA ZCG ZHY ZXP ZY4 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7T9 7XB 8FK K9. MBDVC PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-d43b1d6e1ee5a66f8572c1486b4ff3e9f06435b6255f09cf956f89c062e8a0e73 |
IEDL.DBID | BENPR |
ISSN | 1092-4388 |
IngestDate | Thu Oct 10 19:52:29 EDT 2024 Fri Aug 23 02:44:19 EDT 2024 Sat Sep 28 08:22:01 EDT 2024 Fri Sep 06 12:28:13 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c367t-d43b1d6e1ee5a66f8572c1486b4ff3e9f06435b6255f09cf956f89c062e8a0e73 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-9971-6321 0000-0003-2230-2897 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911120 |
PMID | 35944047 |
PQID | 2706867620 |
PQPubID | 135351 |
PageCount | 21 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_journals_2706867620 crossref_primary_10_1044_2022_JSLHR_22_00161 pubmed_primary_35944047 eric_primary_EJ1361204 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2022 text: 2022-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Rockville |
PublicationTitle | Journal of speech, language, and hearing research |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Speech Lang Hear Res |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | American Speech-Language-Hearing Association |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association |
References | e_1_3_2_28_1 e_1_3_2_20_1 e_1_3_2_66_1 e_1_3_2_43_1 e_1_3_2_85_1 e_1_3_2_24_1 e_1_3_2_47_1 e_1_3_2_100_1 e_1_3_2_62_1 e_1_3_2_81_1 e_1_3_2_16_1 e_1_3_2_39_1 e_1_3_2_7_1 e_1_3_2_31_1 e_1_3_2_77_1 e_1_3_2_12_1 e_1_3_2_35_1 e_1_3_2_58_1 e_1_3_2_96_1 e_1_3_2_3_1 e_1_3_2_92_1 Milisen R. L. (e_1_3_2_64_1) 1954 e_1_3_2_50_1 e_1_3_2_73_1 e_1_3_2_44_1 e_1_3_2_63_1 e_1_3_2_86_1 e_1_3_2_25_1 e_1_3_2_48_1 e_1_3_2_67_1 McAllister Byun T. (e_1_3_2_54_1) 2016; 10 e_1_3_2_40_1 e_1_3_2_103_1 e_1_3_2_17_1 e_1_3_2_2_1 e_1_3_2_55_1 e_1_3_2_32_1 e_1_3_2_74_1 e_1_3_2_6_1 e_1_3_2_13_1 e_1_3_2_59_1 e_1_3_2_97_1 e_1_3_2_36_1 e_1_3_2_78_1 e_1_3_2_93_1 e_1_3_2_51_1 e_1_3_2_70_1 e_1_3_2_49_1 Dunn L. M. (e_1_3_2_21_1) 2007 e_1_3_2_41_1 e_1_3_2_87_1 e_1_3_2_22_1 e_1_3_2_45_1 Goldman R. (e_1_3_2_29_1) 2000 e_1_3_2_26_1 e_1_3_2_68_1 e_1_3_2_83_1 e_1_3_2_60_1 e_1_3_2_102_1 e_1_3_2_106_1 e_1_3_2_9_1 Davis S. M. (e_1_3_2_18_1) 1980 e_1_3_2_10_1 e_1_3_2_33_1 e_1_3_2_52_1 e_1_3_2_75_1 e_1_3_2_5_1 e_1_3_2_14_1 e_1_3_2_37_1 e_1_3_2_56_1 e_1_3_2_79_1 e_1_3_2_98_1 e_1_3_2_94_1 e_1_3_2_71_1 e_1_3_2_90_1 R Core Team (e_1_3_2_82_1) 2019 e_1_3_2_27_1 e_1_3_2_42_1 e_1_3_2_65_1 e_1_3_2_88_1 e_1_3_2_23_1 e_1_3_2_46_1 e_1_3_2_69_1 e_1_3_2_80_1 e_1_3_2_61_1 e_1_3_2_84_1 e_1_3_2_105_1 Van Riper C. (e_1_3_2_101_1) 1996 Semel E. (e_1_3_2_89_1) 2003 Wagner R. K. (e_1_3_2_104_1) 2013 e_1_3_2_38_1 e_1_3_2_8_1 e_1_3_2_19_1 e_1_3_2_30_1 e_1_3_2_76_1 e_1_3_2_11_1 e_1_3_2_53_1 e_1_3_2_34_1 e_1_3_2_4_1 e_1_3_2_15_1 e_1_3_2_57_1 e_1_3_2_99_1 e_1_3_2_95_1 e_1_3_2_72_1 e_1_3_2_91_1 |
References_xml | – volume-title: Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing–Second Edition (CTOPP-2) year: 2013 ident: e_1_3_2_104_1 contributor: fullname: Wagner R. K. – ident: e_1_3_2_26_1 doi: 10.1044/jshr.1501.179 – volume-title: Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals–Fourth Edition year: 2003 ident: e_1_3_2_89_1 contributor: fullname: Semel E. – ident: e_1_3_2_74_1 doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(96)00012-3 – ident: e_1_3_2_103_1 doi: 10.1044/1058-0360.0701.81 – ident: e_1_3_2_93_1 doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4104.941 – ident: e_1_3_2_72_1 doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00084 – ident: e_1_3_2_55_1 doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-16-0248 – ident: e_1_3_2_13_1 doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1359334 – ident: e_1_3_2_35_1 doi: 10.1038/nrn3158 – ident: e_1_3_2_60_1 doi: 10.1044/jshr.2004.694 – ident: e_1_3_2_102_1 doi: 10.1121/1.2773966 – ident: e_1_3_2_19_1 doi: 10.1515/ling.1968.6.44.29 – ident: e_1_3_2_11_1 doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0256) – ident: e_1_3_2_77_1 doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0232 – ident: e_1_3_2_97_1 doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00108 – ident: e_1_3_2_28_1 doi: 10.1121/1.3493430 – ident: e_1_3_2_85_1 doi: 10.1044/jshd.4404.504 – ident: e_1_3_2_9_1 – ident: e_1_3_2_65_1 doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(74)90038-0 – ident: e_1_3_2_8_1 doi: 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00216 – ident: e_1_3_2_88_1 doi: 10.32614/RJ-2016-021 – ident: e_1_3_2_99_1 doi: 10.1121/1.4784878 – ident: e_1_3_2_92_1 doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4206.1461 – ident: e_1_3_2_59_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172022 – ident: e_1_3_2_43_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 – ident: e_1_3_2_78_1 doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12259 – volume-title: Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test–Fourth Edition year: 2007 ident: e_1_3_2_21_1 contributor: fullname: Dunn L. M. – ident: e_1_3_2_45_1 doi: 10.1121/1.426686 – ident: e_1_3_2_100_1 doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00444 – ident: e_1_3_2_33_1 doi: 10.1006/jpho.2000.0121 – ident: e_1_3_2_23_1 doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562905 – ident: e_1_3_2_25_1 doi: 10.1093/comjnl/41.8.578 – ident: e_1_3_2_51_1 doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00437 – ident: e_1_3_2_16_1 doi: 10.1044/0161-1461.2201.334 – ident: e_1_3_2_49_1 doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/025) – ident: e_1_3_2_94_1 doi: 10.1044/jshr.1003.428 – ident: e_1_3_2_86_1 doi: 10.1044/jshd.5402.193 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 issue: 567 year: 2016 ident: e_1_3_2_54_1 article-title: Differential effects of visual-acoustic biofeedback intervention for residual speech errors publication-title: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience contributor: fullname: McAllister Byun T. – ident: e_1_3_2_91_1 doi: 10.1044/jshd.4001.92 – ident: e_1_3_2_32_1 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/10471.001.0001 – ident: e_1_3_2_40_1 doi: 10.1177/001440296603200705 – ident: e_1_3_2_44_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104365 – volume-title: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Programming language] year: 2019 ident: e_1_3_2_82_1 contributor: fullname: R Core Team – ident: e_1_3_2_90_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.06.032 – ident: e_1_3_2_47_1 doi: 10.2466/pms.1974.38.1.11 – ident: e_1_3_2_17_1 doi: 10.1044/jshd.5101.03 – ident: e_1_3_2_12_1 doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0103) – start-page: 283 volume-title: Speech and language: Advances in basic research and practice year: 1980 ident: e_1_3_2_18_1 contributor: fullname: Davis S. M. – ident: e_1_3_2_20_1 doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1477834 – ident: e_1_3_2_22_1 doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677761 – ident: e_1_3_2_75_1 doi: 10.1044/2020_LSHSS-20-00012 – ident: e_1_3_2_96_1 doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12478 – ident: e_1_3_2_24_1 doi: 10.1080/02699200110069410 – ident: e_1_3_2_5_1 doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(87)90027-X – ident: e_1_3_2_61_1 doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12610 – ident: e_1_3_2_10_1 doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562909 – ident: e_1_3_2_15_1 doi: 10.1080/02699206.2020.1739749 – ident: e_1_3_2_30_1 doi: 10.1044/2021_PERSP-20-00218 – ident: e_1_3_2_7_1 doi: 10.2307/2532201 – ident: e_1_3_2_48_1 doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.03.007 – ident: e_1_3_2_56_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2014.11.003 – ident: e_1_3_2_39_1 doi: 10.1007/s11749-009-0138-x – ident: e_1_3_2_84_1 doi: 10.1016/0021-9924(95)00058-X – volume-title: Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation–Second Edition year: 2000 ident: e_1_3_2_29_1 contributor: fullname: Goldman R. – ident: e_1_3_2_79_1 doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0441 – ident: e_1_3_2_71_1 doi: 10.1121/1.3593366 – ident: e_1_3_2_36_1 doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1562911 – ident: e_1_3_2_83_1 doi: 10.3109/13682826809011454 – ident: e_1_3_2_38_1 doi: 10.1080/02701367.2001.10608943 – ident: e_1_3_2_6_1 doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0257) – ident: e_1_3_2_50_1 doi: 10.2466/pms.1971.33.3.831 – ident: e_1_3_2_3_1 – ident: e_1_3_2_2_1 doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2007/017) – ident: e_1_3_2_80_1 doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0261 – ident: e_1_3_2_69_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007321 – ident: e_1_3_2_31_1 doi: 10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224 – ident: e_1_3_2_42_1 doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.682695 – ident: e_1_3_2_70_1 doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/095) – ident: e_1_3_2_63_1 doi: 10.1044/1058-0360.0804.347 – ident: e_1_3_2_66_1 doi: 10.1080/00222895.1990.10735527 – ident: e_1_3_2_52_1 doi: 10.1044/2020_PERSP-20-00191 – ident: e_1_3_2_67_1 doi: 10.1121/1.1567280 – ident: e_1_3_2_87_1 doi: 10.1214/aos/1176344136 – ident: e_1_3_2_4_1 doi: 10.3390/foods9111594 – ident: e_1_3_2_53_1 doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1941-5 – year: 1954 ident: e_1_3_2_64_1 article-title: The disorder of articulation: A systematic clinical and experimental approach publication-title: Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders (Monograph Supplement 4) contributor: fullname: Milisen R. L. – ident: e_1_3_2_95_1 doi: 10.1111/jtxs.12076 – ident: e_1_3_2_58_1 doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0034 – ident: e_1_3_2_68_1 doi: 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-19-00162 – ident: e_1_3_2_46_1 – ident: e_1_3_2_41_1 doi: 10.1007/s007840050035 – ident: e_1_3_2_27_1 doi: 10.2466/pms.1971.33.3.711 – ident: e_1_3_2_57_1 doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0083) – volume-title: Speech correction: An introduction to speech pathology and audiology year: 1996 ident: e_1_3_2_101_1 contributor: fullname: Van Riper C. – ident: e_1_3_2_73_1 doi: 10.1044/jshr.3406.1318 – ident: e_1_3_2_76_1 doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00060 – ident: e_1_3_2_106_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.10.002 – ident: e_1_3_2_34_1 doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0519 – ident: e_1_3_2_62_1 doi: 10.3109/02699209508985321 – ident: e_1_3_2_81_1 doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0031 – ident: e_1_3_2_105_1 doi: 10.1016/S0167-6393(98)00058-2 – ident: e_1_3_2_14_1 doi: 10.1044/jshd.2302.124 – ident: e_1_3_2_37_1 doi: 10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0122 – ident: e_1_3_2_98_1 doi: 10.1080/026992099299211 |
SSID | ssj0000146 |
Score | 2.4432533 |
Snippet | Purpose: This study aimed to identify predictors of response to treatment for residual speech sound disorder (RSSD) affecting English rhotics. Progress was... This study aimed to identify predictors of response to treatment for residual speech sound disorder (RSSD) affecting English rhotics. Progress was tracked... Purpose: This study aimed to identify predictors of response to treatment for residual speech sound disorder (RSSD) affecting English rhotics. Progress was... |
SourceID | proquest crossref pubmed eric |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 2860 |
SubjectTerms | Accuracy Acoustics Adolescents Apraxias Articulation (Speech) Auditory Perception Biofeedback Biofeedback, Psychology - methods Case Studies Children Children & youth Clinical significance Comparative Analysis English English language Error Correction Feedback Feedback (Response) Humans Intelligence Tests Intervention Language Language Processing Language Tests Measurement North American English Outcomes of Treatment Personalized learning Phonology Predictor Variables Rhotics Scores Sensory Experience Sound Speech - physiology Speech disorders Speech Impairments Speech Language Pathology Speech Sound Disorder - diagnostic imaging Speech Sound Disorder - therapy Speech Tests Speech Therapy Speech Therapy - methods Ultrasonic imaging Verbal Ability Vocabulary Voice Disorders Young Children |
Title | Baseline Stimulability Predicts Patterns of Response to Traditional and Ultrasound Biofeedback Treatment for Residual Speech Sound Disorder |
URI | http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1361204 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35944047 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2706867620 |
Volume | 65 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwED-xTUK8IChsFErlB8QTEflw7OQJrVOnquqmqqWib5E_RbWSlCR74G_gn8Z2nI4JibcoOluWzvb97nz3O4AP5siEkZYykBJLW5JDAx4zA-S4xBTjlGnHpXdzS2YbPN-mWx9wa3xaZX8nuotaVsLGyD_H1BYzmKMbfjn8DGzXKPu66ltonMBZHGH7THs2md4uV38RSGHScw1hbD39uJivF7NVYHwwB3ce2aPHKc__YE1nc65fwHMPFtFlp92X8ESVA7hY-BBjgz6ixZEVuRnA0xv_UD6AUVd2i76pvWa1MpL9j6q-ewW_J8wVoiu0bnc_7vcdWfcvtKztDG2Dlo52s2xQpdGqS6NVqK2QMW1y14UPESsl2uzbmjW2NROa7CptTCFn4s6I-fR1ZDCxncCVfKH1QSnx3SzFyve8n69hcz39ejULfFuGQCSEtoHECY8kUZFSKSNEZymNhfGqCMdaJyrXFuWk3DhWqQ5zoY0HprNchCRWGQsVTc7htKxK9QZQqEWkBWY4jjmWUmQG7-lcpglXMo8yMoRPvXKKQ8e-UbhXc4yLB10W5sPpcgjnVoFH0ek8SgyCC_EQRr1KC39Gm-JhRw3holPzcWSS5pY4kb79_8B38Mwuo0sIHMFpW9-r9waktHwMJ3RLx34_jp1b_gd9w-lI |
link.rule.ids | 220,315,786,790,12083,21416,27955,27956,31752,33777,43343,43838,74100,74657 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lj9MwEB5BVwIuCAq7FAr4gDgRkYfjJCdEUVelpFXVbsXeIj-11ZakJNkDv4E_je04XVZI3KJobFka2_PNeOYbgHf6yPiBEsITAgtTkpN4LKQayDGBE4xjqiyX3mJJZls8v4wvXcCtcWmV_Z1oL2pRcRMj_xgmpphBH13_0-GnZ7pGmddV10LjPpwYys10ACeT6XK1_otACpOeawhj4-mHxXyTz9ae9sEs3Lljj-6mPP-DNa3NOX8Cjx1YRJ877T6Fe7IcwlnuQowNeo_yIytyM4QHC_dQPoRxV3aLvsu9orXUkv2Pqr5-Br8n1BaiS7Rpdz9u9h1Z9y-0qs0MbYNWlnazbFCl0LpLo5WorZA2bWLXhQ8RLQXa7tuaNqY1E5rsKqVNIaP8Wou59HWkMbGZwJZ8oc1BSn6ll2Lke97P57A9n158mXmuLYPHI5K0nsARCwSRgZQxJUSlcRJy7VURhpWKZKYMyomZdqxi5WdcaQ9MpRn3SShT6sskOoVBWZXyBSBf8UBxTHEYMiwETzXeU5mIIyZFFqRkBB965RSHjn2jsK_mGBe3uiz0h9XlCE6NAo-i03kQaQTn4xGMe5UW7ow2xe2OGsFZp-bjyCjODHFi8vL_A9_Cw9nFIi_yr8tvr-CRWVKXHDiGQVvfyNcasLTsjduVfwC01-pW |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwED_BkCZeECtsK3TgB8QT0fLhOMkTYh9VKd1UrVT0LXL8IaqVpCTZA38D_zRnx-mYkHiLorNl6c6-39l3vwN4h1vGD7SUnpRUmpKcxCtCjkCukDShNObaculdXbPJkk5X8crlPzUurbI_E-1BLSth7shPw8QUM-DW9U-1S4uYX4w_bn96poOUeWl17TQewxP0kr5p45Cskr-opCjrWYcoNTF_mE8Xs8mNh9GYBT4PPNPD5Od_UKf1PuPn8MzBRvKp0_MBPFLlAI5m7rKxIe_JbMeP3Axg_8o9mQ9g1BXgkm9qo3mtULL_UdW3L-D3Gbcl6Yos2vWPu01H2_2LzGszQ9uQuSXgLBtSaXLTJdQq0lYEnZxcdxeJhJeSLDdtzRvTpImcrSuNTrHg4hbFXCI7QXRsJrDFX2SxVUp8x6UY-Z4B9CUsx5dfzyeea9DgiYglrSdpVASSqUCpmDOm0zgJBcZXrKBaRyrTBu_EBYZYsfYzoTEW02kmfBaqlPsqiQ5hr6xKdQzE1yLQgnIahgWVUqSI_HQm46hQMgtSNoQPvXLybcfDkdv3c0rze13m-GF1OYRDo8Cd6OU0iBDL-XQIo16ludutTX5vW0M46tS8GxnFmaFQTF79f-Bb2EdzzGefr7-8hqdmRV2W4Aj22vpOnSByaYs31iT_AHEC7RM |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Baseline+Stimulability+Predicts+Patterns+of+Response+to+Traditional+and+Ultrasound+Biofeedback+Treatment+for+Residual+Speech+Sound+Disorder&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+speech%2C+language%2C+and+hearing+research&rft.au=McAllister%2C+Tara&rft.au=Eads%2C+Amanda&rft.au=Kabakoff%2C+Heather&rft.au=Scott%2C+Marc&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.issn=1092-4388&rft.eissn=1558-9102&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2860&rft.epage=2880&rft_id=info:doi/10.1044%2F2022_JSLHR-22-00161&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1044_2022_JSLHR_22_00161 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1092-4388&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1092-4388&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1092-4388&client=summon |