Coproduction in Social Prescribing Initiatives: Protocol for a Scoping Review

• Published in: JMIR research protocols Vol. 13; p. e57062
• Main Authors: Dougherty, Madeline, Tompkins, Tamara, Zibrowski, Elaine, Cram, Jesse, Ashe, Maureen C, Bhaskar, Le-Tien, Card, Kiffer George, Godfrey, Christina, Hebert, Paul, Lacombe, Ron, Muhl, Caitlin, Mulligan, Kate, Mulvale, Gillian, Nelson, Michelle L A, Norman, Myrna, Symes, Bobbi, Teare, Gary, Welch, Vivian, Kothari, Anita
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Canada JMIR Publications 17.10.2024
• Subjects: Collaboration; Community; Community Health Services; Empowerment; Health disparities; Humans; Research Design; Scoping Reviews As Topic; Subject heading schemes; Systematic review; United Kingdom > UK; clinical setting; health education; nonmedical need; pilot-tested; codevelopment; social need; user involvement; social prescription; social prescribing; community programs; coproduction; health care system; policy
• ISSN: 1929-0748; 1929-0748
• DOI: 10.2196/57062

Social prescribing (SP) takes a holistic approach to health by linking clients from clinical settings to community programs to address their nonmedical needs. The emerging evidence base for SP demonstrates variability in the design and implementation of different SP initiatives. To effectively address these needs, coproduction among clients, communities, stakeholders, and policy makers is important for tailoring SP initiatives for optimal uptake. This study aims to explore the role of coproduction in SP initiatives. The research question is as follows: How and for what purpose has coproduction been incorporated across a range of SP initiatives for different clients? A review of international literature will be conducted following the JBI guidelines for scoping reviews. We will search multiple databases including Scopus, MEDLINE, and the PAIS Index, as well as gray literature, from 2000 to 2023. The primary studies included will describe a nonmedical need for clients, a nonmedical SP program or initiative, coproduction of the SP program, and any follow-up. Review articles and commentaries will be excluded. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles will be screened, and data will be extracted by at least 2 research team members using Covidence and a pilot-tested extraction template. Clients with lived experience will also participate in the research process. Findings will be descriptively summarized and thematically synthesized to answer the research question. The project was funded in 2023, and the results are expected to be submitted for publication in early 2025. Descriptions of what coproduction is meant to accomplish may differ from theoretical aspirations. Continued understanding of how coproduction has been designed and executed across varied international SP models is important for framing engagement in practice for future SP arrangements and their evaluation. We anticipate this review will guide clients, communities, stakeholders, and policy makers in further developing SP practice within health care systems. Open Science Framework Registries B8U4Z; https://osf.io/b8u4z. DERR1-10.2196/57062.