Dynamic visual acuity in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

Background: Head motions cause transient vertigo in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and may reduce visual ability. Objectives: The aim is to investigate the clinical utility of dynamic visual acuity (DVA) test in those patients. Material and methods: Thirty patients, 11 wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa oto-laryngologica Vol. 138; no. 11; pp. 987 - 992
Main Authors Yetiser, Sertac, Ince, Dilay
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 02.11.2018
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0001-6489
1651-2251
1651-2251
DOI10.1080/00016489.2018.1498595

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background: Head motions cause transient vertigo in patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and may reduce visual ability. Objectives: The aim is to investigate the clinical utility of dynamic visual acuity (DVA) test in those patients. Material and methods: Thirty patients, 11 with lateral canal BPPV (6 geotropic and 5 ageotropic), and 19 with posterior canal BPPV, were evaluated with DVA test during rapid horizontal (left and right) and vertical (up and down) head movements. Patients were asked to identify the direction of the letter C, ranging from 1.0 to 0.0 logMAR, while moving their heads. The orientation of the optotype was randomly changed by a computer-generated program. Ten subjects were served as control. Data were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA. p Value <.01 was considered significant. Results: Patients with LC and PC BPPV had significant DVA loss as compared with control subjects (p < .01). However, no significant difference was found in vDVA between patients with LC and PC BPPV, or in hDVA between ipsilesional and contralesional head rotation in patients with LC or PC BPPV (LC: p = .755, PC: p = .765). Conclusions: Patients with BPPV may have impaired visual acuity, particularly during acute onset condition. Present study indicated that DVA test was not helpful for differentiation of the pathologic and normal ears.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0001-6489
1651-2251
1651-2251
DOI:10.1080/00016489.2018.1498595