Robotic surgery in gynecology: is the future already here?

Robotic-assisted surgery has gained widespread acceptance in the surgical community and appears to be the most rapidly developing sector of minimally invasive surgery. However, robotic surgery has been viewed as a development of, or alternative to, laparoscopic surgery and not necessarily as a super...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMinimally invasive therapy and allied technologies Vol. 31; no. 6; pp. 815 - 824
Main Authors Gitas, Georgios, Hanker, Lars, Rody, Achim, Ackermann, Johannes, Alkatout, Ibrahim
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Taylor & Francis 01.08.2022
Subjects
gynecology
laparoscopy
oncological outcome
Robotic surgery
Robotic surgery
gynecology
laparoscopy
oncological outcome
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract Robotic-assisted surgery has gained widespread acceptance in the surgical community and appears to be the most rapidly developing sector of minimally invasive surgery. However, robotic surgery has been viewed as a development of, or alternative to, laparoscopic surgery and not necessarily as a superior technology. The advantages of MIS over open surgery apply to robotic-assisted surgery as well. Nevertheless, conflicting data have been published about the advantages and disadvantages of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery. In the last few years, robotic-assisted surgery has been used for various gynecological procedures such as hysterectomy, lymphadenectomy, myomectomy, sacrocolpopexy or endometriosis operations. In the present review, we analyze the current use of robotic-assisted surgery and its efficiency in gynecology. Patient-based outcomes, such as quality of life and outcomes in morbidly obese patients are also addressed. The potential benefits of single-port robotic-assisted surgery are discussed. Most of the studies published so far state that robotic-assisted surgery does not essentially improve the surgical outcome compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, randomized studies are scarce. Ongoing technological progress over the next few years may improve robotic-assisted techniques and thus optimize the patient's treatment.
AbstractList Robotic-assisted surgery has gained widespread acceptance in the surgical community and appears to be the most rapidly developing sector of minimally invasive surgery. However, robotic surgery has been viewed as a development of, or alternative to, laparoscopic surgery and not necessarily as a superior technology. The advantages of MIS over open surgery apply to robotic-assisted surgery as well. Nevertheless, conflicting data have been published about the advantages and disadvantages of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery. In the last few years, robotic-assisted surgery has been used for various gynecological procedures such as hysterectomy, lymphadenectomy, myomectomy, sacrocolpopexy or endometriosis operations. In the present review, we analyze the current use of robotic-assisted surgery and its efficiency in gynecology. Patient-based outcomes, such as quality of life and outcomes in morbidly obese patients are also addressed. The potential benefits of single-port robotic-assisted surgery are discussed. Most of the studies published so far state that robotic-assisted surgery does not essentially improve the surgical outcome compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, randomized studies are scarce. Ongoing technological progress over the next few years may improve robotic-assisted techniques and thus optimize the patient's treatment.Robotic-assisted surgery has gained widespread acceptance in the surgical community and appears to be the most rapidly developing sector of minimally invasive surgery. However, robotic surgery has been viewed as a development of, or alternative to, laparoscopic surgery and not necessarily as a superior technology. The advantages of MIS over open surgery apply to robotic-assisted surgery as well. Nevertheless, conflicting data have been published about the advantages and disadvantages of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery. In the last few years, robotic-assisted surgery has been used for various gynecological procedures such as hysterectomy, lymphadenectomy, myomectomy, sacrocolpopexy or endometriosis operations. In the present review, we analyze the current use of robotic-assisted surgery and its efficiency in gynecology. Patient-based outcomes, such as quality of life and outcomes in morbidly obese patients are also addressed. The potential benefits of single-port robotic-assisted surgery are discussed. Most of the studies published so far state that robotic-assisted surgery does not essentially improve the surgical outcome compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, randomized studies are scarce. Ongoing technological progress over the next few years may improve robotic-assisted techniques and thus optimize the patient's treatment.
Robotic-assisted surgery has gained widespread acceptance in the surgical community and appears to be the most rapidly developing sector of minimally invasive surgery. However, robotic surgery has been viewed as a development of, or alternative to, laparoscopic surgery and not necessarily as a superior technology. The advantages of MIS over open surgery apply to robotic-assisted surgery as well. Nevertheless, conflicting data have been published about the advantages and disadvantages of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery. In the last few years, robotic-assisted surgery has been used for various gynecological procedures such as hysterectomy, lymphadenectomy, myomectomy, sacrocolpopexy or endometriosis operations. In the present review, we analyze the current use of robotic-assisted surgery and its efficiency in gynecology. Patient-based outcomes, such as quality of life and outcomes in morbidly obese patients are also addressed. The potential benefits of single-port robotic-assisted surgery are discussed. Most of the studies published so far state that robotic-assisted surgery does not essentially improve the surgical outcome compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, randomized studies are scarce. Ongoing technological progress over the next few years may improve robotic-assisted techniques and thus optimize the patient's treatment.
Author Gitas, Georgios
Hanker, Lars
Ackermann, Johannes
Rody, Achim
Alkatout, Ibrahim
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Georgios
  orcidid: 0000-0002-9242-8041
  surname: Gitas
  fullname: Gitas, Georgios
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Lars
  surname: Hanker
  fullname: Hanker, Lars
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Achim
  surname: Rody
  fullname: Rody, Achim
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Johannes
  surname: Ackermann
  fullname: Ackermann, Johannes
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ibrahim
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7194-6034
  surname: Alkatout
  fullname: Alkatout, Ibrahim
  organization: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig Holstein
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34989636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EorTwE0A5cknxI7WTcgBU8ZIqISE4W7azaY3SuNiOUP49KS0cOMBld7T6ZqSdIdpvXAMInRI8JjjHF4TxbCIwH1NMST8IFpztoaP-Pklpwcj-l87SDTRAwxDecE9OWH6IBiwr8oIzfoSmz067aE0SWr8A3yW2SRZdA8bVbtFNExuSuISkamPrIVG1B1V2yRI8XB2jg0rVAU52e4Re725fZg_p_On-cXYzTw3jPKaUmiIHnPNSCJNBbnCvmAEjQGOjWVYZpRlnghdFpommleCKUkU1ZFqZko3Q-TZ37d17CyHKlQ0G6lo14NogKSeCioII3KNnO7TVKyjl2tuV8p38_rcHJlvAeBeCh-oHIVhuepXfvcpNr3LXa--7_OUzNqpoXRO9svW_7uut2zaV8yv14Xxdyqi62vnKq8bYINnfEZ8TPo-u
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2024_2417403
crossref_primary_10_3390_s23208644
crossref_primary_10_17650_1994_4098_2024_20_1_104_113
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_911553
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2022_070218
crossref_primary_10_1007_s43681_023_00361_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2024_1308489
crossref_primary_10_52054_FVVO_16_4_047
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2023_04_026
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina60010053
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isurg_2025_02_001
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_999749
crossref_primary_10_36637_grs_2023_00150
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isurg_2023_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1177_15533506241238038
crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2024_2376837
crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2022_2056707
crossref_primary_10_1177_17455057241302581
crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2024_2323100
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13123576
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00772_023_01076_3
crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2024_2407845
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.024
10.1001/jama.2013.186
10.1097/AOG.0000000000002103
10.3802/jgo.2011.22.4.253
10.1136/ijgc-2018-000019
10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e2
10.1007/s11684-020-0781-x
10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.160
10.1016/j.jmig.2014.04.011
10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f74153
10.1080/13645706.2020.1868009
10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022
10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.014
10.4274/jtgga.2018.0026
10.1002/rcs.1707
10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.038
10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.006
10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265b61a
10.1007/s00464-015-4292-9
10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.007
10.1097/SPV.0000000000000397
10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.012
10.1001/jama.2017.2068
10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.010
10.1097/AOG.0000000000000006
10.1097/AOG.0b013e318280da64
10.1097/AOG.0b013e318231537c
10.5152/jtgga.2016.16187
10.1097/SPV.0000000000000368
10.1097/GCO.0b013e328216f90b
10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8645
10.1111/1471-0528.14640
10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008
10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.017
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.052
10.1007/s11701-020-01061-y
10.1007/s00404-016-4061-6
10.1097/IGC.0000000000001130
10.1089/gyn.2012.0142
10.1056/NEJMoa1806395
10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.038
10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.012
10.12891/ceog3133.2016
10.3390/jcm9092849
10.1038/ijo.2012.159
10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.011
10.3802/jgo.2013.24.1.21
10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.005
10.1002/rcs.2225
10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.030
10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.008
10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.883
10.1007/s11701-010-0170-6
10.1007/s00404-019-05158-0
10.1080/13645706.2020.1802292
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 Society of Medical Innovation and Technology 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 Society of Medical Innovation and Technology 2022
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1080/13645706.2021.2010763
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic

PubMed
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1365-2931
EndPage 824
ExternalDocumentID 34989636
10_1080_13645706_2021_2010763
2010763
Genre Review Article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
00X
03L
04C
0BK
0R~
123
29M
36B
4.4
6PF
AALUX
AAMIU
AAPUL
AAQRR
AAWTL
ABBKH
ABDBF
ABEIZ
ABJNI
ABLIJ
ABLKL
ABUPF
ABXYU
ACENM
ACGEJ
ACGFS
ACIEZ
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADCVX
ADOJX
ADRBQ
ADXPE
AECIN
AENEX
AEOZL
AFKVX
AGDLA
AGFJD
AGRBW
AGYJP
AIJEM
AIRBT
AJWEG
AKBVH
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALQZU
ALYBC
AMDAE
BABNJ
BLEHA
BMSDO
BOHLJ
CCCUG
CS3
DKSSO
DU5
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
ECT
EIHBH
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
EPL
ESX
F5P
H13
HZ~
KRBQP
KSSTO
KWAYT
KYCEM
LJTGL
M4Z
O9-
RNANH
RVRKI
SV3
TBQAZ
TDBHL
TERGH
TFDNU
TFL
TFW
TUROJ
TUS
UEQFS
V1S
~1N
AAGDL
AAYXX
ABWVI
ADYSH
AFRVT
AMPGV
CITATION
NPM
TASJS
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-22c98e086d77c4e8c06d73cec7eb0cb34fcab36376994b1b2f76a22a2be4bacd3
ISSN 1364-5706
1365-2931
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 22:18:12 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:24:04 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:37:37 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:28 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 25 09:05:50 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords Robotic surgery
gynecology
laparoscopy
oncological outcome
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c366t-22c98e086d77c4e8c06d73cec7eb0cb34fcab36376994b1b2f76a22a2be4bacd3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-9242-8041
0000-0002-7194-6034
PMID 34989636
PQID 2617279170
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs informaworld_taylorfrancis_310_1080_13645706_2021_2010763
crossref_citationtrail_10_1080_13645706_2021_2010763
crossref_primary_10_1080_13645706_2021_2010763
proquest_miscellaneous_2617279170
pubmed_primary_34989636
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Minimally invasive therapy and allied technologies
PublicationTitleAlternate Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Publisher_xml – name: Taylor & Francis
References CIT0030
Galaal K (CIT0029) 2012; 9
CIT0032
CIT0031
CIT0034
CIT0033
Bartos P (CIT0020) 2007; 72
CIT0036
CIT0035
CIT0038
CIT0037
CIT0039
Shashoua AR (CIT0017) 2009; 13
CIT0041
CIT0040
CIT0043
CIT0042
CIT0001
CIT0045
CIT0044
Nezhat C (CIT0018) 2009; 13
CIT0003
CIT0047
CIT0002
CIT0046
CIT0005
CIT0049
CIT0004
CIT0048
CIT0007
CIT0006
CIT0008
CIT0050
CIT0052
CIT0051
CIT0010
CIT0054
CIT0053
CIT0012
CIT0056
CIT0011
CIT0055
Galaal K (CIT0027) 2018; 10
CIT0014
CIT0058
CIT0013
CIT0057
CIT0016
CIT0015
CIT0059
CIT0019
CIT0061
CIT0060
CIT0021
CIT0023
CIT0022
Lawrie TA (CIT0009) 2019; 4
CIT0025
CIT0024
CIT0026
CIT0028
References_xml – volume: 13
  start-page: 125
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: CIT0018
  publication-title: JSLS
– ident: CIT0011
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.024
– volume: 10
  start-page: CD006655
  year: 2018
  ident: CIT0027
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– ident: CIT0058
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.186
– ident: CIT0004
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002103
– ident: CIT0012
  doi: 10.3802/jgo.2011.22.4.253
– ident: CIT0019
  doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000019
– ident: CIT0053
  doi: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e2
– ident: CIT0060
  doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0781-x
– volume: 4
  start-page: CD011422
  year: 2019
  ident: CIT0009
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– ident: CIT0059
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.09.160
– ident: CIT0046
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.04.011
– ident: CIT0024
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f74153
– ident: CIT0026
  doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1868009
– ident: CIT0008
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.022
– ident: CIT0051
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.08.014
– volume: 9
  start-page: CD006655
  year: 2012
  ident: CIT0029
  publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev
– ident: CIT0034
  doi: 10.4274/jtgga.2018.0026
– ident: CIT0057
  doi: 10.1002/rcs.1707
– ident: CIT0042
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.038
– ident: CIT0047
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.07.006
– ident: CIT0044
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318265b61a
– ident: CIT0052
  doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4292-9
– ident: CIT0054
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.007
– ident: CIT0055
  doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000397
– ident: CIT0041
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.10.012
– ident: CIT0031
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.2068
– ident: CIT0014
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.05.010
– ident: CIT0033
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000006
– ident: CIT0043
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318280da64
– ident: CIT0032
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318231537c
– ident: CIT0002
  doi: 10.5152/jtgga.2016.16187
– ident: CIT0030
  doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000368
– ident: CIT0001
  doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328216f90b
– ident: CIT0028
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8645
– ident: CIT0037
  doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14640
– ident: CIT0015
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008
– ident: CIT0016
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.11.017
– ident: CIT0025
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.052
– ident: CIT0036
  doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01061-y
– volume: 13
  start-page: 364
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: CIT0017
  publication-title: JSLS
– volume: 72
  start-page: 354
  year: 2007
  ident: CIT0020
  publication-title: Ceska Gynekol
– ident: CIT0038
  doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4061-6
– ident: CIT0056
  doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001130
– ident: CIT0040
  doi: 10.1089/gyn.2012.0142
– ident: CIT0005
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395
– ident: CIT0013
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.038
– ident: CIT0022
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.012
– ident: CIT0035
  doi: 10.12891/ceog3133.2016
– ident: CIT0048
  doi: 10.3390/jcm9092849
– ident: CIT0039
  doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.159
– ident: CIT0061
  doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.01.011
– ident: CIT0010
  doi: 10.3802/jgo.2013.24.1.21
– ident: CIT0021
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.005
– ident: CIT0006
  doi: 10.1002/rcs.2225
– ident: CIT0023
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.030
– ident: CIT0045
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.02.008
– ident: CIT0050
  doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.883
– ident: CIT0049
  doi: 10.1007/s11701-010-0170-6
– ident: CIT0003
  doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05158-0
– ident: CIT0007
  doi: 10.1080/13645706.2020.1802292
SSID ssj0021538
Score 2.3852136
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Robotic-assisted surgery has gained widespread acceptance in the surgical community and appears to be the most rapidly developing sector of minimally invasive...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
informaworld
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 815
SubjectTerms gynecology
laparoscopy
oncological outcome
Robotic surgery
Title Robotic surgery in gynecology: is the future already here?
URI https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13645706.2021.2010763
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34989636
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2617279170
Volume 31
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwELaWrYS4IN4sLxmJG8qSOI7j9IK2QKkQy6HaSr1FtuO0kXYT1GSRypFfzjh2slm2qDwukePIsTXzZR7OzBihV1KCHZH7OXCAZh5lIfW4jjh4KUYbE54nbS7M_As7OqGfTqPT0ejHIGpp3cip-n5lXsm_cBX6gK8mS_YvONu_FDqgDfyFK3AYrn_E4-NKVqbgam1zm83exdllqZXNQAFfv6hbw9IWDnltao-K7BKMwwv9S0DfvCiLlVguzTu-iTak3WZm2fJM8MSYqk23Dz-IPPxYNGKzu15U9UamlS5i47PY_DI6rqxUn6nzYtWjzcR2rLrjmqtzaOmt_QhwZbtoOIugxc7RIAPpGjLqRbHval93fZEHNkcwFMnurtiRr9zmfnaq2qZf72gBGzZpZjOTTWGVQRvE18nS7QLb7skNtEfA1SBjtDc7eH9w2LvtRifY7D27-C4PjPtvrpxiy8LZqn_7ey-mtWYWd9Bt54bgmcXUXTTS5T10c-4CLe6jfQct7KCFixJvoLWPixoDPrAFFnbAwgZYbx-gk8MPi3dHnjtmw1MhY41HiEq4Btc2i2NFNVc-tEKlVaylr2RIcyVkyEATJQmVgSR5zAQhgkhNpVBZ-BCNy6rUjxGOdExUwONMsZzGTPGMwciI-8zXoDn4BNGONKlyNejNUSjLNHClajuKpoaiqaPoBE37YV9tEZbrBiRDuqdNC8rc4jENrxn7smNSCqLW_D8Tpa7WdUpaaz8JYn-CHlnu9csJacJBl7En_zHzU3Rr80E9Q-PmYq2fg8nbyBcOkz8BRt-h-g
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic+surgery+in+gynecology%3A+is+the+future+already+here%3F&rft.jtitle=Minimally+invasive+therapy+and+allied+technologies&rft.au=Gitas%2C+Georgios&rft.au=Hanker%2C+Lars&rft.au=Rody%2C+Achim&rft.au=Ackermann%2C+Johannes&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.pub=Taylor+%26+Francis&rft.issn=1364-5706&rft.eissn=1365-2931&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=815&rft.epage=824&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080%2F13645706.2021.2010763&rft.externalDocID=2010763
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1364-5706&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1364-5706&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1364-5706&client=summon